Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “transcript”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 685 records · Page 38Linked to original sources
PubMed1994

A glutamine-rich hydrophobic patch in transcription factor Sp1 contacts the dTAFII110 component of the Drosophila TFIID complex and mediates transcriptional activation.

Activation of transcription by the promoter-specific factor Sp1 requires coactivators that are tightly associated with the TATA-box-binding protein (TBP) in the TFIID complex. Recent work has shown that the two glutamine-rich activation domains of Sp1, A and B, can interact with at least one component of this complex, the TBP-associated factor dTAFII110. Here we report the mapping of a region of Sp1 with alternating glutamine and hydrophobic residues which is required for the interaction with dTAFII110 and is important for mediating transcriptional activation. Substitution of bulky hydrophobic residues within this region decreased both interaction with dTAFII110 and transcriptional activation in Drosophila cells. In contrast, mutation of glutamine residues in this region had no effect. Thus, the strength of the Sp1-TAF interaction correlates with the potency of Sp1 as a transcriptional activator, indicating that this activator-TAF interaction is an important part of the mechanism of transcriptional activation. Sequence comparison of three activation domains shown to bind dTAFII110 suggests that different activators that utilize dTAFII110 as a coactivator may share common sequence features that we have determined to be important for the Sp1-dTAFII110 interaction.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1997

Synergistic and promoter-selective activation of transcription by recruitment of transcription factors TFIID and TFIIB.

Eukaryotic transcriptional activators may function by stimulating formation of RNA polymerase II preinitiation complexes at the core promoter of genes. In this case, their mode of action will intrinsically depend on how these complexes assemble on promoters in living cells, an issue that remains largely unexplored. Here we show that in yeast the basal transcription machinery is brought to the promoter in the form of at least two subcomplexes, TFIID and a complex comprising TFIIB and other essential components. Individual recruitment of either complex by artificial contact with a transcriptionally inactive, sequence-specific DNA-binding protein suffices to trigger transcriptional activation from a wild-type core promoter bearing the appropriate binding site. In contrast, activation from a promoter containing a weakened TATA element is only observed upon recruitment of TFIID. Tethering TFIIB on that promoter remains without effect, but the simultaneous recruitment of both components leads to strong synergistic activation. These findings suggest a simple mechanism whereby two activators that contact distinct subcomplexes of the basal machinery may stimulate transcription synergistically and differentially depending on the nature of the promoter.

Promoter Regions, Genetic↗
PubMed1996

A splice variant of the ITF-2 transcript encodes a transcription factor that inhibits MyoD activity.

Proteins of the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) family are transcription factors that bind DNA containing the E box motif (CANNTG) found in the promoters of many muscle-specific genes. ITF-2 is a bHLH protein with widespread expression that is thought to form active heterodimers with MyoD, a muscle-specific bHLH transcription factor. We have isolated cDNAs derived from two alternatively spliced forms of mouse ITF-2, termed MITF-2A and -2B. These proteins differ in their N termini. Neither MITF-2A nor -2B transactivated the cardiac alpha-actin promoter, which contains an E box, when transfected into nonmuscle cells. In fact, MITF-2B inhibited MyoD activation of the cardiac alpha-actin promoter. This inhibitory activity required the N-terminal 83 amino acids since MITF-2A showed no inhibitory activity, and a mutant MITF-2B with deletion of the N-terminal 83 amino acids failed to inhibit MyoD-mediated transcriptional activation. MyoD activity was also inhibited by Id, a HLH protein, and this inhibition was reversed by the addition of excess E12 or MITF-2A. However, the inhibition of MyoD activity by MITF-2B was not reversed with E12 or MITF-2A. While Id is thought to inhibit MyoD by binding and sequestering potential dimerization partners, MITF-2B appears to inhibit MyoD activity by forming an inactive heterodimer with MyoD. Thus, differentially spliced transcripts of mouse ITF-2 encode different proteins that appear to dimerize with MyoD and activate or repress transcription.

Actins↗
PubMed1997

Characterization of the transcriptional regulator YY1. The bipartite transactivation domain is independent of interaction with the TATA box-binding protein, transcription factor IIB, TAFII55, or cAMP-responsive element-binding protein (CPB)-binding protein.

YY1 is a multifunctional transcription factor implicated in both positive and negative regulation of gene expression as well as in initiation of transcription. We show that YY1 is ubiquitously expressed in growing, differentiated, and growth-arrested cells. The protein is phosphorylated and has a half-life of 3.5 h. To define functional domains, we have generated a large panel of YY1 mutant proteins. These were used to define precisely the DNA-binding domain, the region responsible for nuclear localization, and the transactivation domain. The two acidic domains at the N terminus each provide about half of the transcriptional activating activity. Furthermore, the spacer region between the Gly/Ala-rich and zinc finger domains has accessory function in transactivation. YY1 has been shown previously to bind to TAFII55, TATA box-binding protein, transcription factor IIB, and p300. In addition, we identified cAMP-responsive element-binding protein (CBP)-binding protein as a YY1 binding partner. Surprisingly, these proteins did not bind to the domains involved in transactivation, but rather to the zinc finger and Gly/Ala-rich domains of YY1. Thus, these proteins do not explain the transcriptional activating activity of YY1, but rather may be involved in repression or in initiation.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed2003

The HBZ factor of human T-cell leukemia virus type I dimerizes with transcription factors JunB and c-Jun and modulates their transcriptional activity.

The human T-cell leukemia virus type I (HTLV-I)-encoded Tax protein activates transcription from the viral promoter via association with the cellular basic leucine zipper factor cAMP-response element-binding protein-2. Tax is also able to induce cellular transformation of T lymphocytes probably by modulating transcriptional activity of cellular factors, including nuclear factor-kappaB, E2F, activator protein-1 (AP-1), and p53. Recently, we characterized in HTLV-I-infected cells the presence of a novel viral protein, HBZ, encoded by the complementary strand of the HTLV-I RNA genome (Gaudray, G., Gachon, F., Basbous, J., Biard-Piechaczyk, M., Devaux, C., and Mesnard, J.-M. (2002) J. Virol. 76, 12813-12822). HBZ is a nuclear basic leucine zipper protein that down-regulates Tax-dependent viral transcription by inhibiting the binding of cAMP-response element-binding protein-2 to the HTLV-I promoter. In searching for other cellular targets of HBZ, we identified two members of the Jun family, JunB and c-Jun. Co-immunoprecipitation and cellular colocalization confirmed that HBZ interacts in vivo with JunB and c-Jun. When transiently introduced into CEM cells with a reporter gene containing the AP-1 site from the collagenase promoter, HBZ suppressed transactivation by c-Jun. On the other hand, the combination of HBZ with Jun-B had higher transcriptional activity than JunB alone. Consistent with the structure of its basic domain, we demonstrate that HBZ decreases the DNA-binding activity of c-Jun and JunB. Last, we show that c-Jun is no longer capable of activating the basal expression of the HTLV-I promoter in the presence of HBZ in vivo. Our results support the hypothesis that HBZ could be a negative modulator of the Tax effect by controlling Tax expression at the transcriptional level and by attenuating activation of AP-1 by Tax.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

A tissue-restricted cAMP transcriptional response: SOX10 modulates alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone-triggered expression of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor in melanocytes.

alpha-Melanocyte-stimulating hormone (MSH) utilizes cAMP to trigger pigmentation of melanocytes via activation of melanocyte-restricted microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (M-MITF) expression. M-MITF is a melanocyte-restricted helix-loop-helix transcription factor capable of transactivating promoters for multiple genes whose products modulate pigmentation. Although M-MITF promoter activation by MSH is known to occur through a conserved cAMP-response element (CRE), it remains unclear how this CRE exhibits such exquisitely tissue-restricted responsiveness. Here we show that cAMP-mediated CRE-binding protein activation of the M-MITF promoter requires a second DNA element located approximately 100 bp upstream, a site that is bound and activated by SOX10. Mutations in the SOX10 transcription factor, like MITF, results in a disorder known as Waardenburg Syndrome. The cAMP response of the M-MITF promoter was analyzed in melanoma and neuroblastoma cells (which are neural crest-derived but lack both M-MITF and SOX10 expression). M-MITF promoter responsiveness to cAMP was found to depend upon SOX10, and reciprocally, SOX10 transactivation was dependent upon the CRE. Ectopic SOX10 expression, in cooperation with cAMP signaling, activated the M-MITF promoter function and the expression of measurable endogenous M-MITF transcripts in neuroblastoma cells. SOX10dom, a mutant allele, failed to cooperate with cAMP in neuroblastoma cells and attenuated the cAMP responsiveness of the M-MITF promoter in melanoma cells. These observations demonstrate a means whereby the ubiquitous cAMP signaling machinery is harnessed to produce a highly tissue-restricted transcriptional response by cooperating with architectural factors, in this case SOX10.

Alleles↗
PubMed1996

The major transcriptional transactivation domain of simian virus 40 large T antigen associates nonconcurrently with multiple components of the transcriptional preinitiation complex.

Simian virus 40 (SV40) large T antigen (Tag) is a promiscuous transcriptional transactivator; however, its mechanism of transactivation remains unknown. Recent studies have suggested the possible involvement of protein-protein interactions with TBP, the TATA box-binding protein of TFIID, and TEF-1, an enhancer-binding factor. We show here that (i) the Tag domain containing amino acids 133 to 249 directly interacts with the general transcription factor TFIIB, the activator protein Sp1, and the 140-kDa subunit of RNA polymerase II, as well as with TBP and TEF-1; (ii) these interactions can also occur when these transcription factors are present in their functional states in cellular extracts; (iii) binding of Tag to TBP is eliminated by preincubation of TBP either at 48 degrees C or with the adenovirus 13S E1a protein; (iv) this domain of Tag cannot bind concurrently to more than one of these transcription factors; and (v) the substitution of Tag amino acid residues 173 and 174 inactivates the ability of this Tag domain both to associate with any of these transcription factors and to transactivate the SV40 late promoter. Thus, we conclude that SV40 Tag probably does not transactivate via the concurrent interaction with multiple components of the preinitiation complex. Rather, we hypothesize that transactivation by Tag may primarily occur by removing or preventing the binding of factors that inhibit the formation of preinitiation complexes.

Antigens, Polyomavirus Transforming↗
PubMed1994

Identical components of yeast transcription factor IIIB are required and sufficient for transcription of TATA box-containing and TATA-less genes.

Specific transcription by RNA polymerase III requires recognition of the promoter-bound transcription factor IIIB (TFIIIB), of which the TATA-binding protein (TBP) is a subunit. The recruitment of TFIIIB to TATA-less genes is mediated by protein-protein interactions with transcription factor IIIC (TFIIIC) bound to the box A and box B elements. Here we examine interactions involved in the recruitment of TFIIIB to the TATA element-containing yeast U6 small nuclear RNA gene SNR6. TFIIIC is not required for the formation of TFIIIB-SNR6 gene complexes with purified components. The same three components of TFIIIB that are necessary for TFIIIC-dependent transcription of tRNA genes (recombinant TBP and Brf and the denaturing-gel-purified 90-kDa subunit) are required and sufficient for TATA box-directed U6 transcription. Despite its TFIIIC-independent, DNA sequence-dependent assembly, the TFIIIB-SNR6 complex shares important features with tDNA- and 5S rDNA-TFIIIB complexes, such as extent and location of footprint, stability, and resistance to heparin. These properties are clearly distinct from those of a TBP-SNR6 complex. In the SNR6 gene, box B, the primary binding site for TFIIIC, is suboptimally spaced relative to box A. At limiting TBP concentrations and on bare DNA, TFIIIC stimulates the formation of TFIIIB complexes with SNR6 but contributes poorly, at best, to the formation of properly placed complexes.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1995

The yeast TFB1 and SSL1 genes, which encode subunits of transcription factor IIH, are required for nucleotide excision repair and RNA polymerase II transcription.

The essential TFB1 and SSL1 genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae encode two subunits of the RNA polymerase II transcription factor TFIIH (factor b). Here we show that extracts of temperature-sensitive mutants carrying mutations in both genes (tfb1-101 and ssl1-1) are defective in nucleotide excision repair (NER) and RNA polymerase II transcription but are proficient for base excision repair. RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription at the CYC1 promoter was normal at permissive temperatures but defective in extracts preincubated at a restrictive temperature. In contrast, defective NER was observed at temperatures that are permissive for growth. Additionally, both mutants manifested increased sensitivity to UV radiation at permissive temperatures. The extent of this sensitivity was not increased in a tfb1-101 strain and was only slightly increased in a ssl1-1 strain at temperatures that are semipermissive for growth. Purified factor TFIIH complemented defective NER in both tfb1-101 and ssl1-1 mutant extracts. These results define TFB1 and SSL1 as bona fide NER genes and indicate that, as is the case with the yeast Rad3 and Ss12 (Rad25) proteins, Tfb1 and Ssl1 are required for both RNA polymerase II basal transcription and NER. Our results also suggest that the repair and transcription functions of Tfb1 and Ssl1 are separable.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1998

Transcription factor Pip can enhance DNA binding by E47, leading to transcriptional synergy involving multiple protein domains.

The transcription factors E2A (E12/E47) and Pip are both required for normal B-cell development. Each protein binds to regulatory sequences within various immunoglobulin enhancer elements. Activity of E2A proteins can be regulated by interactions with other proteins which influence their DNA binding or activation potential. Similarly, Pip function can be influenced by interaction with the protein PU.1, which can recruit Pip to bind to DNA. We show here that a previously unidentified Pip binding site resides adjacent to the E2A binding site within the immunoglobulin kappa 3' enhancer. Both of these binding sites are crucial for high-level enhancer activity. We found that E47 and Pip can functionally interact to generate a very potent 100-fold transcriptional synergy. Through a series of mutagenesis experiments, we identified the Pip sequences necessary for transcriptional activation and for synergy with E47. Two synergy domains (residues 140 to 207 and 300 to 420) in addition to the Pip DNA binding domain (residues 1 to 134) are required for maximal synergy with E47. We also identified a Pip domain (residues 207 to 300) that appears to mask Pip transactivation potential. Part of the synergy mechanism between E47 and Pip appears to involve the ability of Pip to increase DNA binding by E47, perhaps by inducing a conformational change in the E47 protein. E47 may also induce a conformational change in Pip which unmasks sequences important for transcriptional activity. Based upon our results, we propose a model for E47-Pip transcriptional synergy.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed2002

Regulation of E2F1-dependent gene transcription and apoptosis by the ETS-related transcription factor GABPgamma1.

The E2F family of transcription factors comprises six related members which are involved in the control of the coordinated progression through the G(1)/S-phase transition of cell cycle or in cell fate decision. Their activity is regulated by pocket proteins, including pRb, p107, and p130. Here we show that E2F1 directly interacts with the ETS-related transcription factor GABPgamma1 in vitro and in vivo. The binding domain interacting with GABPgamma1 was mapped to the C-terminal amino acids 310 to 437 of E2F1, which include its transactivation and pRb binding domain. Among the E2F family of transcription factors, the interaction with GABPgamma1 is restricted to E2F1. DNA-binding E2F1 complexes containing GABPgamma1 are characterized by enhanced E2F1-dependent transcriptional activity. Moreover, GABPgamma1 suppresses E2F1-dependent apoptosis by mechanisms other than the inhibition of the transactivation capacity of E2F1. In summary, our results provide evidence for a novel pRb-independent mechanism regulating E2F1-dependent transcription and apoptosis.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Transcriptional down-regulation of CXC chemokine receptor 4 induced by impaired association of transcription regulator YY1 with c-Myc in human herpesvirus 6-infected cells.

We have recently reported that down-regulation of CXC chemokine receptor (CXCR) 4 in CD4(+) T lymphocytes is induced by human herpesvirus (HHV) 6 infection. In this study, we further studied the mechanisms of HHV-6-induced CXCR4 down-regulation, focusing on the regulation of CXCR4 transcription. Down-regulation of CXCR4 transcription was detected in HHV-6A-infected JJHAN and HHV-6B-infected MT-4 cell lines, as we had previously reported for HHV-6-infected peripheral blood CD4(+) T lymphocytes. Luciferase assays revealed that a YY1-binding site around -320 relative to the transcription start site is important for down-regulation of CXCR4 transcription in HHV-6-infected cells. The binding activity of YY1, which is a repressor of CXCR4 transcription, to the CXCR4 promoter appeared to significantly increase in HHV-6-infected cells compared with the binding activity in mock-infected cells. Immunoprecipitation assays showed that in HHV-6-infected cells association of c-Myc with YY1 was decreased and that of Max with c-Myc was increased, whereas association of Mad with Max appeared to be decreased. The amounts of each of YY1, c-Myc, Max, and Mad proteins synthesized in cells were not altered by HHV-6 infection. These data indicate that the decreased association of YY1 with c-Myc that is caused by impaired interaction in the c-Myc/Max/Mad network results in increased binding activity of YY1 to the CXCR4 promoter, mediating down-regulation of CXCR4 production in HHV-6-infected cells.

Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcriptio↗
PubMed1999

Transcriptional regulation of the heat shock protein genes by STAT family transcription factors.

We have previously demonstrated that interleukin-6 (IL-6) increases the levels of the heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) and activates the Hsp90beta promoter via the IL-6-activated transcription factors NF-IL6 and STAT-3. In addition, interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) treatment increases the levels of Hsp70 and Hsp90 and also enhances the activity of the Hsp70 and Hsp90beta promoters with these effects being dependent on activation of the STAT-1 transcription factor by IFN-gamma. The effect of IL-6/STAT-3 and IFN-gamma/STAT-1 was mediated via a short region of the Hsp70/Hsp90 promoters, which also mediates the effects of NF-IL6. This region also contains a binding site for the stress-activated transcription factor HSF-1. Furthermore, STAT-1 and HSF-1 interact with one another via a protein-protein interaction and produce a strong activation of transcription. In contrast, STAT-3 and HSF-1 antagonize one another and reduce the activation of both the Hsp70 and Hsp90 promoters. Thus, STAT-1 or STAT-3 activation alone or together results in the activation of Hsp promoters. However, STAT-1 or STAT-3 interact differently with HSF-1 to regulate Hsp promoter activity. These results indicate that STATs are able to moduate the Hsp70 and Hsp90 gene promoters and that these transcription factors are likely to play a very important role in Hsp gene activation by nonstressful stimuli and the integration of these responses with the stress response of these genes.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Specificity of transcriptional regulation by the zinc finger transcription factors Sp1, Sp3, and Egr-1.

The transcription factors Sp1, Sp3, and Egr-1 bind with their zinc finger DNA-binding domains to GC-rich sequences in the regulatory regions of their target genes. The similarity of the DNA-binding sites of Sp1, Sp3, and Egr-1 has triggered the hypothesis that they compete for the same DNA-binding site. We have investigated the specificity of transcriptional regulation by Sp1, Sp3, and Egr-1 using dominant-negative mutants that block the DNA-binding site of Sp1, Sp3, or Egr-1, respectively. The results show that constitutive transcription of Sp1 regulated reporter genes, containing Sp1 sites derived from the aldolase C and p21WAF1/Cip1 genes, or the long terminal repeat of HIV-1, was impaired by dominant-negative mutants of Sp1 and Sp3, but not by a dominant-negative Egr-1. Transcription mediated by Egr-1 was induced by transfection of expression vectors encoding wild-type or mutated Egr-1 or by stimulation of the extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase pathway via an inducible B-Raf-estrogen receptor fusion protein. In all cases transcription of Egr-1-regulated reporter genes, containing Egr-1 binding sites derived from the Egr-1 or the synapsin I gene was impaired by a dominant-negative Egr-1, but not by dominant-negative Sp1 or Sp3 mutants. These results show that there are genuine Sp1/Sp3 or Egr-1 controlled genes showing no cross-regulation of Sp1/Sp3 and Egr-1 through the same DNA-binding site. This does not exclude the existence of composite Sp1/Sp3/Egr-1 binding sites, where competition for a common DNA-binding site occurs.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2005

Regulation of GTP cyclohydrolase I gene transcription by basic region leucine zipper transcription factors.

Tetrahydrobiopterin is an essential cofactor for the phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan hydroxylases, and the family of nitric oxide synthases. The initial and rate-limiting enzyme in the biosynthesis of tetrahydrobiopterin is GTP cyclohydrolase I. The proximal promoter of the human GTP cyclohydrolase I gene contains the sequence motif 5'-TGACGCGA-3', resembling a cAMP response element (CRE). The objective of this study was to analyze the regulation of GTP cyclohydrolase I gene transcription by basic region leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factors. A constitutively active mutant of the cAMP response element binding (CREB) protein strongly stimulated GTP cyclohydrolase I promoter activity, indicating that the CRE in the context of the GTP cyclohydrolase I gene is functional. Likewise, GTP cyclohydrolase I promoter/luciferase gene transcription was stimulated following nuclear expression of the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Constitutively active mutants of activating transcription factor 2 (ATF2) and c-Jun additionally stimulated GTP cyclohydrolase I promoter activity, but to a lesser extent than the constitutively active CREB mutant. The fact that stress-activated protein kinases target the GTP cyclohydrolase I gene was corroborated by expression experiments involving p38 and MEKK1 protein kinases. We conclude that signaling pathways involving either the cAMP-dependent protein kinase or stress-activated protein kinases converge to the GTP cyclohydrolase I gene. Hence, enzymatic reactions that require tetrahydrobiopterin as cofactor are therefore indirectly controlled by signaling cascades involving the signal-responsive transcription factors CREB, c-Jun, and ATF2.

Activating Transcription Factor 2↗
PubMed2000

Transcriptional control of the neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor gene cluster by the beta43' enhancer, Sp1, SCIP and ETS transcription factors.

Receptors assembled from the products of a neuronal beta4alpha3alpha5 NAChR gene cluster depend on these genes being coordinately regulated in particular populations of neurons. Little is known, however, about the transcriptional mechanisms that are likely to underlie their co-expression in correct neuronal cell types. We have identified several regulatory elements and transcription factors that influence transcription of the alpha3 and beta4 genes. The promoters of these genes appear to contain a common cis element that binds Sp1 transcription factors. They can be activated by the POU-domain factor SCIP and activation does not require SCIP binding sites. Between these two promoters is a cell type specific enhancer called beta43'. This enhancer has little activity in non-neuronal cells and is preferentially active in particular populations of central neurons. The clustered genes are potential targets of ETS factors as the ETS domain factor, Pet-1 can activate beta43'-dependent transcription. The neuron-selective properties of beta43' and its location suggest that it is a component of the cis regulatory information required to control expression of the beta4 and alpha3 genes in specific populations of neurons.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Interaction between a transcriptional activator and transcription factor IIB in vivo.

Transcription of messenger RNA-encoding genes in vitro requires many protein factors. Transcription factor IID, possibly with the cooperation of TFIIA, binds to the TATA element of the promoter, forming a complex that can bind TFIIB (refs 6, 7) followed by RNA polymerase II (refs 6, 8) and other factors. One or more of these steps is thought to be facilitated by gene-specific transcriptional activation proteins; this seems to require TFIID-associated auxiliary factors and may involve direct contact between the activator and TFIID and/or TFIIB. If such contact is necessary in vivo, activation might conceivably be blocked by a TFIIB derivative containing the sequences necessary for this interaction, but lacking those necessary for binding to the rest of the transcriptional apparatus, an effect similar to that referred to as squelching or transcriptional interference. Here we show that the activity of the glutamine-rich fushi tarazu activation domain is indeed blocked by truncated TFIIB derivatives in Drosophila Schneider L2 cells, suggesting that it is mediated by interactions with TFIIB.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Transcriptional regulation of the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) gene by the Sp family of transcription factors.

In this study, we have localized an enhancer element in the 5'-flanking region of the HGF gene promoter and have identified its functional transcriptional factors. Through transient transfection of NIH3T3 fibroblast cells and gel mobility shift assays, the functional binding site was localized to a short region (-318 to -303 bp from the transcription start site) which has a CTCCC sequence. This motif is also conserved in the human HGF promoter and acts as a binding site for the Sp family of transcription factors. In the presence of NIH3T3 nuclear protein extracts, this enhancer region formed specific DNA-protein complexes which were totally abrogated by excess amounts of consensus Sp1 oligonucleotide. In gel mobility supershift assays, anti-Sp1 and anti-Sp3 antibodies specifically recognized these complexes as was evident by their slower migration. Site-specific mutation of this binding motif resulted in total loss of Sp1 and Sp3 binding and a concomitant loss of enhancer function within the context of the HGF promoter. Furthermore, in transient cotransfection assays, overexpression of Sp1 and/or Sp3 stimulated HGF promoter activity independently and additively through binding to the Sp1 binding site in the HGF gene promoter region. DNaseI hypersensitive analysis of freshly isolated nuclei from NIH3T3 cells revealed that five hypersensitive sites (HSS) are present within the 2 kb region immediately upstream of the HGF promoter. One of these sites was mapped to position -0.3 kb from the transcription start site. These data show that both Sp1 and Sp3 transcription factors upregulate HGF promoter activity by binding to the Sp1 binding site at position -318 to -303 bp in the HGF gene promoter.

3T3 Cells↗