Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Simvastatin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 685 records · Page 38Linked to original sources
PubMed1990

Bezafibrate and simvastatin (MK-733) in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia.

Simvastatin, a new 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl co-enzyme A reductase inhibitor, was compared to bezafibrate, a fibric acid derivative, in an open cross-over placebo-controlled study. Bezafibrate was administered as a 200 mg dose 3 times daily, while simvastatin dosage ranged from 10 mg to 40 mg once daily at night. Bezafibrate produced a non-significant 13.1% (P = 0.113) decrease in total cholesterol (TC), a 20.7% (P less than 0.05) decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), an increase of 26.5% (P less than 0.01) in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and an improvement in the HDL:LDL ratio of 77.3% (P less than 0.01). Simvastatin 10 mg and 20 mg daily reduced TC by 18.6% and 22.6%, respectively, and LDL-C by 23.9% and 28.6% respectively (P less than 0.01), while no significant increase was noted in HDL-C. Simvastatin 40 mg daily reduced TC and LDL-C by 27.1% and 37.6%, respectively (P less than 0.01), increased HDL-C by 32.0% (P less than 0.05) and improved on the HDL:LDL ratio by 130.8% (P less than 0.01). This showed improvements over bezafibrate of 13.5% for TC, 18.9% for LDL-C, 6.0% for HDL-C and 55.8% for HDL:LDL ratio. It was concluded that simvastatin was well tolerated and had significant hypocholesterolaemic effects when taken once daily.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Comparison of simvastatin and cholestyramine in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia.

The effects of simvastatin, a competitive inhibitor of the enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase, on plasma lipid levels were compared with those of the bile acid sequestrant cholestyramine in a randomized parallel study of 60 subjects with primary hypercholesterolaemia. After a 12-week direct comparison period 37 subjects with inadequate cholesterol reduction received a combination of both drugs and all subjects were followed for a further 40 weeks. Simvastatin was more effective than cholestyramine in lowering total and LDL cholesterol levels and the LDL/HDL ratio (-31.7% v. -19.7% [P less than 0.01], -41.0% v. -31.8% [P less than 0.05] and -46.7% v. -33.6% [P less than 0.01], respectively at Week 12). Only simvastatin significantly increased the HDL cholesterol concentration (+13.3% [P less than 0.01] v. +6.4%). Cholestyramine increased plasma triglyceride levels by 37.5% (P less than 0.01) whereas simvastatin caused a slight non-significant reduction. Combined therapy produced a further decrease in total and LDL cholesterol levels, and in the LDL/HDL ratio, which was sustained for the duration of the study. Simvastatin was better tolerated than cholestyramine (P less than 0.01), and combining the two drugs enhanced efficacy without increasing the frequency of side effects.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

[Simvastatin versus gemfibrozil in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia in hypertensive patients treated with hydrochlorothiazide].

Recent pharmacological studies confirmed the role of hypercholesterolemia in the pathogenesis of coronary atherosclerosis. A 10% reduction in cholesterol levels can reduce the risk of coronary heart disease by 15%. However many hypercholesterolemic patients often suffer from arterial hypertension and drugs such as thiazide diuretics cause an imbalance in lipid metabolism. The efficacy and the tolerability of simvastatin (a inhibitor of HGM-CoA reductase) with that of gemfibrozil (a fibric acid derivative, which can reduce the VLDL level) were compared in a placebo-controlled study in 2 groups of patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and mild-to-moderate essential hypertension treated with hydrochlorothiazide. After 10 weeks standard hypolipidemic diet and hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg od) therapy, 30 patients whose cholesterol levels were still greater than or equal to 250 mg/100 ml and whose diastolic blood pressure was less than 95 mmHg were randomized to one of the following treatments: simvastatin, 20 mg od, gemfibrozil, 600 mg bid or placebo, while continuing dietetic and diuretic treatment. After 24 weeks treatment, simvastatin induced a 37% reduction in cholesterol plasma levels, a 9% increase of HDL and a 16% reduction of LDL. APO-A1 showed a 4% increase, while APO-B showed a 3% reduction. Gemfibrozil induced a 20% reduction in plasma triglycerides and a 13% decrease in plasma cholesterol, with a significant 19% increase in HDL and a 11% reduction in LDL. No significant variations in any of the lipid parameters monitored were observed in the placebo group. Treatment with simvastatin or gemfibrozil in hypertensive patients in hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy can reduce total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol plasma levels, while significantly increasing HDL plasma levels compared to placebo. Simvastatin, however, resulted more efficient than gemfibrozil on total cholesterol or cholesterol fractions.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

[The Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study: the clinical consequences].

In the recently reported Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S), 4,444 men and women between 35 and 70 years of age who had coronary heart disease and plasma total cholesterol concentrations of 212 to 310 mg per deciliter (5.5 to 8.0 mmol/l) received simvastatin or placebo for 5.4 years; in the treatment group, mortality from coronary heart disease was 42 percent lower and mortality from all causes was 30 percent lower. Further analysis of the relation between the risk of major coronary events and baseline cholesterol levels in patients randomised to placebo or simvastatin therapy in the study showed that simvastatin significantly reduced the risk of major coronary events in all quartiles of baseline total, high-density-lipoprotein, and low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol, by a similar amount in each quartile. Clearly, cholesterol-modifying interventions can substantially improve the outlook for patients with coronary heart disease and should be considered in identification and treatment of patients with established coronary heart disease. The available data from secondary intervention trials indicates that all patients with documented ischemic heart disease should be offered a reliable assessment of plasma total cholesterol. However, since the impact of simvastatin on CHD seems to begin after about one year of therapy it would be reasonable to exclude very old persons and patients with serious disease with a limited life-expectancy. As a consequence of the 4S data it should be recommended that all the patients in question, who after lifestyle modifications and non-pharmacological risk factor modification still have total cholesterol levels above 200 mg per deciliter (5.2 mmol) should be offered treatment with a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Combined bezafibrate and simvastatin treatment for mixed hyperlipidaemia.

The safety and efficacy of combined bezafibrate-simvastatin therapy was evaluated in 49 patients with diet-resistant mixed hyperlipidaemia (type IIb). After a two-month placebo phase, patients were randomized to receive either Bezafibrate Slow Release (SR) 400 mg mane or simvastatin 20 mg nocte followed by three months combination therapy. Total cholesterol, triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol were measured at monthly intervals. Apolipoproteins (apo) A1 and B, lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] and fibrinogen were measured before and after each treatment. Simvastatin was more effective than Bezafibrate SR in reducing total cholesterol (2.0 vs. 1.1 mmol/l, p = 0.003) and lowering LDL cholesterol (1.7 vs. 0.4 mmol/l, p = 0.0001) whereas Bezafibrate SR was more effective in reducing triglycerides (by 41% vs. 17%, p = 0.001) and fibrinogen (by 23% vs. 3%, p = 0.004). Compared with simvastatin monotherapy, combined drug therapy induced further reductions in triglycerides (by 26%, p = 0.0003) and apoB (by 11 mg/dl, p = 0.03) and an increase in apoA1 (by 21 mg/dl, p = 0.0008). Symptomatic and biochemical adverse events did not occur more frequently on combined drug therapy than on monotherapy. The combination of bezafibrate and simvastatin was more effective in controlling mixed hyperlipidaemia than either drug alone and did not provoke more adverse events.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

[Therapy of hypercholesterolemia after heart transplantation with the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin in long-term follow-up].

The problem of hypercholesterolemia following heart transplantation (HTx) is often underestimated. Up to now there is no concept of therapy allowing an optimal adjustment of lipid parameters. Therapeutical trials using ion exchange resins, derivates of nicotinic acids and fibrates were not successful due to Cyclosporin A interaction, hepatotoxicity and limited efficacy of the applied substances. In a prospective, randomized and controlled trial, we investigated the effects of monotherapy with the HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitor Simvastatin in heart transplant recipients. The study included 70 patients (Simvastatin n = 37, control group n = 33). Eight patients died within the first 3 month postoperatively following HTx. Purpose of the study was adjustment of LDL-cholesterol-values in the Simvastatin-treated group to < 110 mg/dl. Following 24 months of treatment a mean LDL-cholesterol-plasma level of 110 mg/dl was obtained. The corresponding mean value of the control group was 150 mg/dl. The difference between both groups was significant (p < .001). In the same period the mean HDL-cholesterol values increased by approximately 15% in both groups. The ratio of LDL-/HDL-cholesterol was significantly lower in the Simvastatin treated group (2.28) than in the control group (2.94) (p < .01). There was no significant difference in Lp(a)-values. No adverse effects were observed within the following period of 24 months, particularly no increase in the frequency of rejection episodes. The drug induced hypercholesterolemia following HTx could be treated safely and effectively by low-dose Simvastatin.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effects of simvastatin, a cholesterol synthesis inhibitor, on phosphatidylcholine synthesis in HepG2 cells.

The effects of the addition of a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, simvastatin, to the medium on sterol synthesis and phosphatidylcholine (PC) synthesis were studied in HepG2 cells. The cells were cultured with simvastatin at concentrations of 10(-7) and 10(-6) mol/L for 6 hours, and radioactive lipid precursors were added 1 hour before harvesting. Simvastatin inhibited cholesterol synthesis from [14C]acetate in a dose-dependent manner. It also decreased the incorporation of [14C]choline into PC by 30%; this decrease was accompanied by a decrease in phosphocholine cytidylyltransferase activity in cell homogenates. Simvastatin had no significant effects on the incorporation of [3H]glycerol into phospholipids. These data indicate that simvastatin has two different functions: inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase and depression of de novo synthesis of PC via the cytidine diphosphate-choline pathway, which, in turn, may result in a decrease in plasma lipid levels.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗
PubMed1993

Pravastatin and simvastatin differently inhibit cholesterol biosynthesis in human lens.

PURPOSE: In the current study, the hypocholesterolemic drugs pravastatin and simvastatin were compared for their influence on cholesterol biosynthesis in the human lens. METHODS: For measurements of cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis rates, human lenses were incubated for 20 hr in the presence of [14C]-acetate, and pravastatin or simvastatin. Radiolabeled [14C]-cholesterol and [14C]-fatty acids were determined. To avoid the influence of individual differences, one lens from each donor was incubated without drug (control) and the other lens was incubated in the presence of drug. For each lens pair, the percentage inhibition of the cholesterol synthesis caused by the drug was calculated. Fatty acid synthesis was not influenced by the drugs. By comparing the fatty acid synthesis rate of the drug-incubated with the control lens of a pair, a predefined exclusion criterion was used to eliminate lens pairs in which the lenses had no comparable biosynthetic capacities. RESULTS: Using various concentrations of the drugs, a dose-response curve was constructed for the inhibition of the cholesterol synthesis. The IC50 values (drug concentration give 50% inhibition) were 0.5 mumol/l and 0.004 mumol/l for pravastatin and simvastatin, respectively. 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase activity in microsomal membranes from human lens cortex was inhibited by simvastatin and pravastatin to the same extent. CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions used in this study, cholesterol synthesis in human lenses is inhibited by simvastatin 100-fold more effectively than by pravastatin. This difference was likely due to differences in the intracellular exposure of the reductase to the drugs in intact human lenses.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

The effects of simvastatin and pravastatin on objective and subjective measures of nocturnal sleep: a comparison of two structurally different HMG CoA reductase inhibitors in patients with primary moderate hypercholesterolaemia.

1. It has been suggested that HMG CoA reductase inhibitors which are administered as inactive, lipophilic lactones (e.g. simvastatin) have a greater propensity to evoke nocturnal sleep disturbances than pravastatin, an inhibitor given in the active, hydrophilic, open-acid form. 2. The effects of 4 weeks treatment with equipotent doses of simvastatin (20 mg day-1) and pravastatin (40 mg day-1) have been compared using polysomnography and subjective sleep assessments in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period, incomplete block design study involving 24 male patients with primary moderate hypercholesterolaemia (mean LDL cholesterol 5.11 mmol l-1). 3. Analysis of sleep EEG measures relevant to insomnia provided no evidence of significant differences between pravastatin, simvastatin and placebo, except in terms of entries and latency to stage I sleep. The number of entries to stage I sleep was significantly greater after simvastatin treatment than after either pravastatin or placebo (P < 0.05), but by contrast the latency to stage I sleep was significantly prolonged only in the pravastatin group (P < 0.05 vs placebo). 4. Subjective ratings of sleep initiation, maintenance and quality made during and after therapy were not significantly different between the three treatment groups. 5. It appears that the inherent hydrophobicity of simvastatin does not increase the occurrence of sleep disturbances in this patient population at a dose shown to elicit a characteristic hypolipidaemic response.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

[Effectiveness, tolerance and safety of simvastatin in comparison with bezafibrate in treatment of hypercholesterolemia].

The efficacy, tolerability and safety of simvastatin was compared to that of bezafibrate in a randomized placebo controlled double-blind trial including 64 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia with total cholesterol levels above 240 mg/dl and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol above 195 mg/dl. During a placebo period of four weeks patients were counselled for a diet low in cholesterol (< 300 mg/day) and saturated fat (< 10% of calories). This period was also used for randomization of the individuals into the bezafibrate and simvastatin group, respectively. Patients assigned to bezafibrate treatment took bezafibrate at 600 mg/day throughout the entire 12 weeks of active treatment. Patients assigned to simvastatin took simvastatin at 10 mg/day when LDL-cholesterol was below 195 mg/dl, and at 20 mg/day when LDL-cholesterol was above 195 mg. To compare the lipid lowering effect of both substances total cholesterol, LDL- and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol were measured as well as triglycerides, very low density lipoprotein (VLDL)-cholesterol and the concentrations of apolipoproteins (apo)-AI, apo-AII and apo-B, respectively. These variables were compared between the two study groups with respect to the percentage change from baseline levels obtained during the placebo period. After a 12 week treatment period mean percent reduction of total cholesterol in the simvastatin group was 24% and that of LDL-cholesterol was 36%, both more pronounced than the respective reductions (14% and 17%) observed in the bezafibrate group. The mean percent increase in HDL-cholesterol was similar in both treatment groups (simvastation by 20% vs. bezafibrate by 17%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1996

[Long term treatment of moderate to severe hypercholesterolemia with low dose statin. Comparison of simvastatin and pravastatin].

Sixty-seven subjects with primary hypercholesterolemia were enrolled in an open study with "low dosages" of inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3methylglutaril coenzyme A reductase. Patients were randomized in comparative and parallel study with simvastatin 10 mg (30 subjects) and pravastatin 20 mg (27 subjects) once in the evening for a treatment period of 12 months. At the end of the treatment the plasma concentrations of total and LDL cholesterol were reduced respectively by 21% (p < 0.001) and 29% (p < 0.001), plasma triglyceride concentration was reduced by 16%, high density lipoprotein (HDL) was increased by 2.9%. The efficacy of drugs was increasing during the study: at the third month 63% of subjects and at the twelfth month 89% of subjects showed a LDL < 160 mg/dL. In this study the drugs were well-tolerated, but 11 subjects showed a slight and transitory increase of CK. A treated group with simvastatin showed a similar decrease of the total cholesterol and LDL as that one treated with pravastatin. Pravastatin in comparison with simvastatin reduced significantly plasma triglycerides. There was no significant difference between the groups in the frequency of drug-related adverse effects. In conclusion "low dosages" of simvastatin and pravastatin in long term treatment were very efficacious in the reduction of total and LDL cholesterol. In our study, the decrease of total and LDL cholesterol was time-dependent, with the greatest reduction after sixth months. There were no significant differences between 10 mg of simvastatin and 20 mg of pravastatin on reduction of total and LDL cholesterol levels. Triglycerides decreased significantly only with pravastatin.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

A Randomized Multicenter Trial Comparing and Efficacy of Simvastatin and Fluvastatin.

BACKGROUND: Inhibitors of hydroxymethylglutaryl co-enzyme A reductase are widely used for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Physicians and third-party payers need an accurate measure of their relative potency and hypolipidemic efficacy. We have therefore compared simvastatin against fluvastatin, the newest member of this class. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred fifty-eight hypercholesterolemic patients in seven United States lipid clinics participated in this balanced double-blind incomplete block study. After a placebo-diet run-in period, patients received treatment with active drug for three consecutive 5-week periods, with measurement of lipids in a NHLBI-CDC standardized central laboratory at the end of each period. Each patient was randomly assigned to three of the following five treatments: simvastatin 5 mg, 10 mg, and 20 mg and fluvastatin 20 mg and 40 mg. The mean percent reductions in low density lipoprotein cholesterol from baseline were 21, 27, 32, 16, and 23 respectively. The simvastatin/fluvastatin milligram potency ratio was 6.8 (95% CI, 5.3-9.3). At the same 20 mg dose, simvastatin produced an effect on LDL cholesterol approximately double that of fluvastatin and resulted in 46% of patients achieving their National Cholesterol Education Program low density lipoprotein cholesterol target levels, compared to 12% for fluvastatin. CONCLUSIONS: Fluvastatin at its maximal dose of 40 mg daily is approximately equivalent to simvastatin 5 mg daily. Higher doses of simvastatin are considerably more effective in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2001

Simvastatin and atorvastatin enhance hypotensive effect of diltiazem in rats.

Effects of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, simvastatin and atorvastatin, on diltiazem-induced hypotension were examined in anaesthetized rats and compared to that of pravastatin. Vehicle, 2 mg/kg/day simvastatin, 2 mg/kg/day atorvastatin, or 4 mg/kg/day pravastatin was administered orally for 4 days. Diltiazem at 3 mg/kg was given orally 2 hours after the final administration of the inhibitors. Arterial blood pressure was measured via a cannula introduced into the left carotid artery, and heart rate was counted from the pulse pressure. In all groups, diltiazem significantly decreased the mean arterial blood pressure without any changes in heart rate. Pretreatment with simvastatin and atorvastatin significantly enhanced the hypotensive effect of diltiazem, while that with pravastatin did not. Heart rate was not modified by pretreatment with the inhibitors. The results indicate that concomitant use of diltiazem with simvastatin or atorvastatin enhances diltiazem-induced hypotension, probably by competitive inhibition of diltiazem metabolism with simvastatin and atorvastatin metabolisms.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Lipid-altering efficacy and safety of simvastatin 80 mg/day: worldwide long-term experience in patients with hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Clinical data suggesting that larger decreases in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) result in greater reductions in coronary heart disease events have led to the establishment of aggressive LDL-C targets for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. In view of this, the efficacy and safety of a new maximum dose of simvastatin, 80 mg, were evaluated in 9 studies involving 2819 hypercholesterolemic patients. This report focuses on the combined results from the 4 main or Pivotal studies in which a total of 1936 patients received simvastatin 40 or 80 mg for 36 to 48 weeks. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Pivotal studies had similar randomized, multicenter, controlled, double-blind, parallel-group designs. Their combined results demonstrated a significant advantage in the LDL-C-lowering effect for the 80 mg dose. At week 24, the mean percentage reductions (95% confidence intervals) from baseline in LDL-C for the 40 and 80 mg groups were -39.8% (-40.9, -38.7) and -45.7% (-46.5, -45.0) respectively (p < 0.001, between groups), and larger reductions in total cholesterol and triglycerides were also observed in the 80 mg group. Both doses were well tolerated. No new or unexpected adverse events were observed and the overall clinical event profiles were similar in the two groups. Clinically significant hepatic transaminase increases (> 3 times the upper limit of normal/ULN) and myopathy (muscle symptoms plus creatine kinase increase > 10 times ULN) occurred infrequently with both doses. Simvastatin 80 mg had a comparable efficacy and safety profile in women and men as well as in non-elderly and elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin 80 mg provides additional LDL-C and triglyceride reductions compared to the 40 mg dose and has an excellent safety and tolerability profile.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Regression of carotid and femoral artery intima-media thickness in familial hypercholesterolemia: treatment with simvastatin.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether high-dose simvastatin therapy could reduce carotid and femoral artery intima-media thickness (IMT) in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) to prevent cardiovascular disease. BACKGROUND: Imaging of arterial walls with B-mode ultrasonography is increasingly used as a noninvasive surrogate marker of cardiovascular disease. Intervention trials using this modality have shown that by reducing risk factors, progression of atherosclerosis was inhibited. METHODS: After a washout period of 6 weeks, all patients with FH started monotherapy with simvastatin, 80 mg/d, for 2 years. The primary end point was the change (in millimeters) of the mean combined far-wall IMT of predefined carotid and femoral arterial segments at 2 years. RESULTS: We included a total of 153 patients with FH. Mean +/- SD combined baseline IMT was 1.07 +/- 0.23 mm. After treatment with simvastatin for 2 years, this IMT decreased by a mean of 0.081 mm (95% confidence interval, -0.109 to -0.053; P<.001), with its largest reduction in the femoral artery (-0.283 mm; P<.001). An actual decrease of combined IMT was seen in 69.8% of all patients. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose simvastatin therapy reduces arterial wall IMT in more than two thirds of the patients, with its largest effect on the femoral artery. Furthermore, patients with FH who were treated with both statin and antihypertensive medication experienced a significantly greater benefit in terms of IMT reduction.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Human lens cholesterol concentrations in patients who used lovastatin or simvastatin.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether long-term therapeutic use of the hypocholesterolemic drugs lovastatin and simvastatin significantly alters the distribution and concentration of cholesterol in the human lens. Such changes might precede observable alterations in lens structure. METHODS: Pairs of lenses (9-13 pairs) from patients (age range, 46-81 years) who had been taking lovastatin or simvastatin before their death (estimated for the previous 2-4 years) and lenses from similarly aged control subjects were divided into outer cortex and inner cortex plus nucleus by dissolution in a detergent-containing buffer. Ten minutes of dissolution removed 17% to 19% of the lens total volume, which accounted for about 20% of the width of the equatorial cortex and 75% of the width of the sagittal cortex. This fraction plus the residual lens was homogenized, saponified, and assayed for cholesterol by gas-liquid chromatography. RESULTS: The cortex of adult control lenses contained about 4 microg of cholesterol per cubic millimeter of volume. This concentration increased to 10 to 15 microg/mm3 in the adult nucleus and decreased to about 6 microg/mm3 in the juvenile and fetal nucleus. Treatment with neither lovastatin nor simvastatin significantly altered the concentration of cholesterol in either the cortex or nuclear fractions. CONCLUSIONS: Variations in concentration of cholesterol along the radii of the lens reflect differences in the density or packing of fiber cell membranes. The observed distribution of cholesterol supports the recent model of the adult lens structure, which, from surface to center, is the cortex, adult nucleus,juvenile nucleus, fetal nucleus, and embryonic nucleus. Finding no significant changes in concentration of cholesterol in the cortex formed during treatment with lovastatin or simvastatin reinforces the results of clinical studies that indicate a high lenticular safety of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors. Nevertheless, caution is encouraged in assuming a similar ocular safety in newer drugs that inhibit cholesterol synthesis at later metabolic steps. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Does clinical use of hypocholesterolemic drugs alter lens cholesterol?

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Pregnancy outcomes after maternal exposure to simvastatin and lovastatin.

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to determine the frequency of adverse outcomes after maternal exposure to simvastatin and/or lovastatin during pregnancy in postmarketing experience. METHODS: We reviewed the Merck & Co., Inc. (West Point, PA) pharmacovigilance database for reports of exposure to simvastatin or lovastatin during pregnancy. The reports were classified as prospective (reported prior to pregnancy outcome) or retrospective (reported after pregnancy outcome) and were evaluated for timing of exposure, outcome, congenital anomalies, and other events. Outcome rates were calculated for prospective pregnancies. RESULTS: We identified 477 reports (386 prospective and 91 retrospective) with 225 prospective outcomes reported: 154 live born infants, 49 elective abortions, 18 spontaneous abortions, and 4 fetal deaths. Six congenital anomalies were reported: chromosomal translocation, trisomy 18, hypospadias, duodenal atresia, cleft lip, and skin tag. The rate of congenital anomalies (congenital anomalies/live births plus fetal deaths) was 3.8%, which is similar to the background population rate (3.2%; relative ratio, 1.21; 95% 1-sided upper confidence interval [CI], 2.02). There were 13 retrospective reports describing a range of congenital anomalies. No specific pattern of anomalies was identified in either the prospective or retrospective reports. Rates for other outcomes were similar to background rates. CONCLUSIONS: Although the number of reports was relatively small, there was no evidence of a notable increase in congenital anomalies in women exposed to simvastatin or lovastatin versus the general population. Greater reporting of congenital abnormalities in the retrospective cohort is not unexpected and may reflect a reporting bias. Drugs should be used during pregnancy only if the benefits outweigh the risks. Simvastatin and lovastatin remain contraindicated during pregnancy.

Abnormalities, Drug-Induced↗
PubMed1990

A selected ion monitoring method for quantifying simvastatin and its acid form in human plasma, using the ferroceneboronate derivative.

Simvastatin, a pro-drug lactone, forms the open carboxylic acid as a major metabolite that inhibits the activity of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase. Simvastatin and the acid in plasma were quantified by a gas chromatography/mass spectrometry/selected ion monitoring (GC/MS/SIM) method. These drugs were separated by solid-phase extraction and independently converted into a 1,3-diol-type compound. This compound reacted with ferroceneboronic acid to yield the cyclic boronate that gave satisfactory mass spectra for GC/MS/SIM measurements. The serum was dominated by the molecular ion appearing as the base peak, thereby leading to a sensitive and selective assay. The calibration curves for simvastatin and the acid were linear in their concentration range of 0.1-10 ng ml-1, where the values of coefficient of variation for both drugs were below 8%, except for the value of 11% for simvastatin at a concentration of 0.1 ng ml-1. The quantification limit for both drugs was 0.1 ng ml-1 on the basis of a signal-to-noise ratio of 4:1.

Ferrous Compounds↗