Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “SEER Program”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 685 records · Page 38Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

A decision aid to assist in adjuvant therapy choices for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Decision aids are tools that help patients make specific and deliberative choices among options. This study was a group randomized controlled trial of a novel decision aid to help patients with breast cancer make adjuvant therapy (AT) decisions. METHODS: Fourteen oncology practices (n=58 physicians) were randomized to receive the decision aid or a control pamphlet. Complete data were obtained from 405 patient-oncologist pairs. Eligible patients had stage I-III disease and had completed their primary treatment. The decision aid is a simple to use computer program, titled Adjuvant!, that provides estimates of outcome with and without AT. Graphical representations of outcome are shared with patients. Consultations were audiotaped, patients interviewed, and physicians completed a self-administered survey. RESULTS: In a multivariable model, the 54 patients (13.3%) who took no AT were more likely to have received the decision aid (p=0.02). A differential effect of the Adjuvant! Decision Guide was noted between node negative and positive patients. It was stated by 86.2% of patients that the decision aid was influential when making their treatment decision. Over 95% of patients reported that the Adjuvant Decision Guide was easy to understand and 75% of physicians believed that it helped them understand their patient's treatment preferences and 81.4% reported the information as useful for themselves. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that a decision aid made a difference in the choice of whether or not to take AT. The decision aid allowed patients and physicians to consider the benefits of AT in an easy to understand format. Treatment decisions were more individualized for patients in the intervention than in the control group. The use of the decision aid was acceptable to both patients and physicians.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Differences in screening mammography outcomes among White, Chinese, and Filipino women.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of screening mammography among Asian women in the United States has received little attention. We determined whether the accuracy of screening mammography for Chinese and Filipino women differs from that of white women. METHODS: We examined a cohort of white, Chinese, and Filipino women 40 years and older who underwent 200,402, 72,604, and 19,087 screening examinations, respectively, between January 1986 and December 2001 in San Francisco County, California, of whom 2177 were diagnosed with breast cancer within 12 months of a screening examination. By linking screening examinations to the regional Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program and the California Cancer Registry, we identified the occurrence of any invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ and then calculated the rate of cancer per 1000 screenings and the sensitivity of mammography. RESULTS: The rate of invasive breast cancer per 1000 screenings was 45% lower for Chinese than for white women aged 50 to 69 years (3.8 vs 6.9; P<.001) and 29% lower for Filipino than for white women (4.9 vs 6.9; P = .03). Rates of ductal carcinoma in situ were similar across all ethnic groups (1.6-1.7 per 1000 screenings; P>or=.60). The sensitivity of mammography was similar for white, Chinese, and Filipino women (81.6%-84.3%; P>.30). CONCLUSIONS: Screening mammography has similar accuracy among white, Chinese, and Filipino women, although the absolute benefit of screening, in terms of breast cancer deaths averted, is likely to be less among Asian women because the rates of invasive cancer are lower compared with white women of similar age. Overdiagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ with screening mammography among Asian women is likely to be comparable to that of white women because the rate of ductal carcinoma in situ was similar in all the examined ethnic groups.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Are increasing 5-year survival rates evidence of success against cancer?

CONTEXT: Increased 5-year survival for cancer patients is generally inferred to mean that cancer treatment has improved and that fewer patients die of cancer. Increased 5-year survival, however, may also reflect changes in diagnosis: finding more people with early-stage cancer, including some who would never have become symptomatic from their cancer. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship over time between 5-year cancer survival and 2 other measures of cancer burden, mortality and incidence. DESIGN AND SETTING: Using population-based statistics reported by the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, we calculated the change in 5-year survival from 1950 to 1995 for the 20 most common solid tumor types. Using the tumor as the unit of analysis, we correlated changes in 5-year survival with changes in mortality and incidence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The association between changes in 5-year survival and changes in mortality and incidence measured using simple correlation coefficients (Pearson and Spearman). RESULTS: From 1950 to 1995, there was an increase in 5-year survival for each of the 20 tumor types. The absolute increase in 5-year survival ranged from 3% (pancreatic cancer) to 50% (prostate cancer). During the same period, mortality rates declined for 12 types of cancer and increased for the remaining 8 types. There was little correlation between the change in 5-year survival for a specific tumor and the change in tumor-related mortality (Pearson r=.00; Spearman r=-.07). On the other hand, the change in 5-year survival was positively correlated with the change in the tumor incidence rate (Pearson r=+. 49; Spearman r=+.37). CONCLUSION: Although 5-year survival is a valid measure for comparing cancer therapies in a randomized trial, our analysis shows that changes in 5-year survival over time bear little relationship to changes in cancer mortality. Instead, they appear primarily related to changing patterns of diagnosis. JAMA. 2000.

Cost of Illness↗
PubMed2004

Survival among women with borderline ovarian tumors and ovarian carcinoma: a population-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: Serous and mucinous ovarian tumors of low malignant potential (LMP-S and LMP-M, respectively) are noninvasive tumors that portend excellent survival when confined to the ovary. Comparison of the survival for women with LMP tumors staged as distant with women who have carcinoma may have important implications for diagnostic terminology and clinical management. METHODS: The authors compared relative survival rates among patients diagnosed with ovarian tumors during the period 1988-1999 (with follow-up through 2000) by histologic type, disease stage, tumor grade (for carcinomas), and patient age, using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. RESULTS: The overall relative survival rate at 10 years (+/- 1.96 standard errors) was 96.9% +/- 2.3% for women with LMP-S tumors, 30.4% +/- 1.7% for women with serous carcinoma (CA-S); 94.0% +/- 3.1% for women with LMP-M tumors, and 64.7% +/- 3.4% for women with mucinous carcinoma (CA-M). The survival rate at 10 years for women with distant-stage LMP-S tumors was 89.9% +/- 5.3%, compared with 96.1% +/- 8.6% for women with well differentiated, localized CA-S. The survival rate for women with distant-stage LMP-M tumors at 5 years was 85.5% +/- 9.0%, compared with 95.5% +/- 3.4% for women with well differentiated, localized CA-M (data for 10 years were limited). Mucinous ovarian neoplasms were associated with an excess of second malignancies of the digestive tract. CONCLUSIONS: Relative survival among women with distant-stage LMP tumors was not 100% and resembled the survival of women who had carcinoma exhibiting favorable prognostic features (localized stage). Future studies of women with high-stage LMP tumors are required to clarify the pathogenesis of extraovarian lesions and their implications for management and prognosis.

Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous↗
PubMed2001

Antidepressant use and the risk of breast cancer: a non-association.

OBJECTIVE: Animal studies have suggested that some antidepressant medications may act as breast tumor promoters and recent epidemiologic studies of antidepressant use and breast cancer outcomes in humans have also reported such associations. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. STUDY POPULATION: 38,273 women who filled a prescription for any of a number of antidepressants and 32,949 who filled a prescription for any other medication during 1989-1991; all were > or =20, enrolled in Medicare, Medicaid or the Pharmaceutical Assistance to the Aged and Disabled (PAAD) programs of New Jersey, and free of evidence of breast cancer. DATA COLLECTION: Antidepressant use was assessed over a period lasting up to 24 months. Subjects were followed for a maximum of 7.5 years; those who had a first diagnosis of breast cancer in the New Jersey Cancer Registry at least 3 months after their index date were considered incident breast cancer cases. Other covariates, including demographic, clinical, and health care utilization variables were also assessed. MAIN OUTCOME OF INTEREST: Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of developing breast cancer, based on multivariable proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Use of antidepressants was unrelated to the development of breast cancer (adjusted HR = 1.04; 95% CI 0.87-1.25). No elevated risks were found for specific antidepressants, including agents found to be breast tumor promoters in animal studies, as well as drugs thought to be associated with breast cancer in prior epidemiologic studies. There was no suggestion that breast cancer risks were increased with more intensive use of antidepressants or that antidepressant use is associated with a more severe stage of cancer at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Despite recent reports from much smaller epidemiologic studies or laboratory animals, these results provide reassurance that antidepressant use is not associated with the development of breast cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Influenza vaccination in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To examine influenza vaccination use in patients undergoing chemotherapy for advanced cancer. METHODS: All Medicare patients treated for stage IV colorectal cancer between 1993 and 1998 while living in one of the regions monitored by the Survival, Epidemiology, and End Results Program who were alive in the fall months and who survived at least 4 months with their cancer were considered eligible to have received vaccination. Their medical bills were analyzed to determine receipt of influenza vaccination and subsequent outcomes. RESULTS: Eligibility criteria were met by 1,225 patients who were undergoing chemotherapy during 1,577 person-years of observation. Overall, 39.7% of patients received influenza vaccination, increasing from 26% in 1993 to 43% in 1998. When vaccination was administered, it was provided by primary care physicians 68% of the time. Vaccinated patients were more likely to be white, of higher socioeconomic status, and to have more comorbidity. Fewer diagnoses of influenza and pneumonia infections were made in vaccinated patients while undergoing treatment. Those patients who were immunized also had fewer chemotherapy interruptions and were more likely to survive through to the beginning of the next fall (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 0.99). There was a trend toward decreased resource use among immunized patients. CONCLUSION: This study observed outcomes associated with influenza vaccination that are similar to those reported for patients without cancer. However, rates of immunization are relatively low, and disparities exist for vulnerable populations. As part of delivering high-quality care, oncologists should promote influenza vaccination for their patients who are undergoing treatment for advanced cancer.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1995

Liver, gallbladder, extrahepatic bile ducts, and pancreas.

BACKGROUND: The liver, gallbladder, bile ducts, and pancreas have a common embryologic origin; cancers that arise from these sites therefore are expected to share a similar spectrum of histologic types. These cancers are known for their extremely poor prognoses. METHODS: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program regarding the incidence, distribution of histologic types, stage of disease, and survival for cancers of the gallbladder (n = 4412), extrahepatic bile ducts (n = 3486), pancreas (n = 23,116), and liver (n = 6,391) were reviewed. The most common histologic types are discussed, and the frequency of rare types is reported. RESULTS: The incidence of biliary cancer decreased, while the incidence of hepatic and pancreatic cancer rose slightly over the 15-year period from 1973 to 1987. Age and sex distributions varied by histologic type. Greater than 98% of pancreatic and biliary cancers were carcinomas, and adenocarcinoma (not otherwise specified) was the most common histologic type recorded. In the liver, hepatocellular carcinoma was the most common type, followed by intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The overall 5-year relative survival rates for these cancers were very low: gallbladder, 12.3%; extrahepatic bile duct, 12.7%; liver 3.1%; and pancreas 2.5% (all stages combined, 1978-1986). CONCLUSIONS: This review confirmed that these carcinomas are associated with a very poor outcome; however, survival was influenced by stage of disease and histologic type. In the gallbladder and extrahepatic bile ducts, papillary adenocarcinoma was associated with the best outcome of all histologic types, and in the exocrine pancreas, mucinous cystadenocarcinoma was associated with the best prognosis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Survival differences among Asian subpopulations in the United States after prostate, colorectal, breast, and cervical carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: Information is limited for Asian subgroups regarding survival after diagnosis of the common cancers amenable to routine screening. The authors examined survival after carcinomas of the prostate, colon/rectum, breast, and cervix separately for Chinese, Japanese, Filipinos, and non-Hispanic whites in the United States. METHODS: Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, the authors compared the distributions of stage at diagnosis and computed 5-year cause specific survival probabilities, overall and by stage of disease, for cancer patients whose diagnosis was in 1988-1994 and who were observed through 1997. RESULTS: Among males, Filipinos were more likely to be diagnosed with advanced stage colorectal and prostate carcinomas than other Asians and non-Hispanic whites; they also experienced worse survival after these cancers. This survival deficit occurred across all stages of colorectal carcinoma and remained apparent within distant stage prostate carcinoma. Among females, Chinese were less likely to receive diagnoses of early stage colorectal carcinoma than Japanese and Filipinas. In addition, their survival was consistently lower across more advanced stages of disease. Chinese also experienced somewhat worse survival after diagnosis of early stage cervical carcinoma. Japanese were more likely to be diagnosed with early stage carcinomas but also tended to experience better survival after prostate, colorectal, and breast carcinomas regardless of stage. CONCLUSIONS: Chinese, Japanese, and Filipinos experienced unequal survival after these screenable carcinomas, indicating that certain groups may benefit from more aggressive screening efforts. The heterogeneity of cancer outcomes observed within the community classified as Asian reinforces the need for cancer statistics to be reported for disaggregated subgroups.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Racial/ethnic patterns in lifetime and age-conditional risk estimates for selected cancers.

BACKGROUND: Estimates of the probability of developing or dying from cancer, either over a lifetime or over a specified number of years, are useful summary measures of the burden of cancer in a population. METHODS: The authors used publicly available DevCan software and new, detailed, racial/ethnic data bases that were developed in the Surveillance Research Program of the National Cancer Institute to produce risk estimates for selected major cancers among American Indian/Aleut/Eskimo, black, Chinese, Filipino, native Hawaiian, Japanese, white (total, non-Hispanic), and Hispanic populations. RESULTS: Japanese and non-Hispanic white men had the highest lifetime risk for developing cancer (47.94% and 47.41%, respectively), and the American Indian/Eskimo/Aleut population (excluding Alaska) had the lowest lifetime risk among men (24.30%). Among women, white and American Indian/Eskimo/Aleut (in Alaska) populations had higher lifetime risks than Japanese women, whereas American Indian/Eskimo/Aleut (excluding Alaska) women had the lowest risk. The age-conditional probabilities of developing cancer within the next 10 years among men and women age 60 years and the lifetime probabilities of dying from cancer also were reported by racial/ethnic group. CONCLUSIONS: Racial/ethnic disparities in the lifetime risk of cancer may be because of differences in cancer incidence rates, but they also may reflect differential mortality rates from causes other than the cancer of interest. Furthermore, because cross-sectional incidence and mortality rates are used in calculating the DevCan lifetime risk estimates, results must be interpreted with caution when events, such as the widespread and rapid implementation of a new screening test, are known to have influenced disease rates.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Effect of axillary lymphadenectomy on breast carcinoma survival.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of axillary lymphadenectomy on breast carcinoma survival, and to determine racial and age differences in the extent of axillary lymphadenectomy. METHODS: Cases were 257,157 women diagnosed with breast carcinoma in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program from 1988 through 2000. Variables included number of lymph nodes removed, number of positive lymph nodes, ratio of positive nodes to number of nodes removed, use of radiation therapy, surgery (breast conserving surgery versus mastectomy), stage, age, race, and hormone receptor status. Correlation statistics were used to determine associations between survival and lymph node variables for all cases and when stratified by stage. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to compare survival by lymph node categories overall and stratified by stage. Cox regression analyses were used to determine factors associated with survival. RESULTS: Older women were significantly less likely to have lymph nodes examined and lymph node involvement compared to younger women, and black women were significantly less likely to have lymph nodes examined, but were significantly more likely to have lymph node involvement compared to white women. Risk of death was significantly reduced for cases who had lymphadenectomy compared to those who did not. For cases diagnosed at stage IIA or higher, risk of death increased significantly with increased number of positive nodes and increased ratio of positive to total nodes removed. CONCLUSIONS: Improved survival in node negative cases of breast carcinoma may be due to removal of undetected micrometastases. Women diagnosed at more advanced stages as well as black women may also benefit from more extensive lymphadenectomy.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Cancer surveillance series: recent trends in childhood cancer incidence and mortality in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Public concern about possible increases in childhood cancer incidence in the United States led us to examine recent incidence and mortality patterns. METHODS: Cancers diagnosed in 14540 children under age 15 years from 1975 through 1995 and reported to nine population-based registries in the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program were investigated. Age-adjusted incidence was analyzed according to anatomic site and histologic categories of the International Classification of Childhood Cancer. Age-adjusted U.S. mortality rates were calculated. Trends in rates were evaluated by use of standard regression methods. RESULTS: A modest rise in the incidence of leukemia, the most common childhood cancer, was largely due to an abrupt increase from 1983 to 1984; rates have decreased slightly since 1989. For brain and other central nervous system (CNS) cancers, incidence rose modestly, although statistically significantly (two-sided P = .020), largely from 1983 through 1986. A few rare childhood cancers demonstrated upward trends (e.g., the 40% of skin cancers designated as dermatofibrosarcomas, adrenal neuroblastomas, and retinoblastomas, the latter two in infants only). In contrast, incidence decreased modestly but statistically significantly for Hodgkin's disease (two-sided P = .037). Mortality rates declined steadily for all major childhood cancer categories, although less rapidly for brain/CNS cancers. CONCLUSIONS: There was no substantial change in incidence for the major pediatric cancers, and rates have remained relatively stable since the mid-1980s. The modest increases that were observed for brain/CNS cancers, leukemia, and infant neuroblastoma were confined to the mid-1980s. The patterns suggest that the increases likely reflected diagnostic improvements or reporting changes. Dramatic declines in childhood cancer mortality represent treatment-related improvements in survival.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Second primary ovarian cancer among women diagnosed previously with cancer.

This study assessed the risk of second primary ovarian cancer among United States women diagnosed previously with invasive cancer. We analyzed data from cancer registries participating in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program for women diagnosed with invasive cancer between 1973 and 1996. We calculated the risk [observed (O)/expected numbers (E)] of second primary ovarian cancer by cancer site and age at diagnosis of first primary cancer (<50 years and > or =50 years), race (all, white, and black), and years since first cancer (0-4, 5-9, 10-14, and 15-24 years). Statistical tests and 95% confidence intervals (CI) assumed a Poisson distribution. A significantly increased risk of ovarian cancer was found for women who were aged <50 years at diagnosis with melanoma (O/E = 3.5, 95% CI = 2.1-5.5) or cancer of the breast (O/E = 6.0, 95% CI = 4.9-7.2), cervix (O/E = 4.2, 95% CI = 2.6-6.3), corpus uteri (O/E = 11.9, 95% CI = 7.3-18.4), colon (O/E = 17.9, 95% CI = 11.1-27.3), or ovary (O/E = 4.9, 95% CI = 2.7-8.2). No increased risk was found for women aged > or =50 years. Ovarian cancer risk remained elevated after these first primary cancers 5-9 years after diagnosis; for breast and colon cancer, risk remained elevated 15-24 years after diagnosis. Women > or =50 years at diagnosis with melanoma or cancer of the cervix, corpus uteri, ovary, rectum, or lung and bronchus were at a decreased risk for second primary ovarian cancer. Ovarian cancer risk is higher than expected for women who were diagnosed with certain types of cancer at <50 years of age.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1996

Post-irradiation malignant mesothelioma.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 30 patients with malignant mesothelioma following radiotherapy have been described. Population-based studies of this occurrence have not been reported. METHODS: Patients with malignant mesothelioma of the pleura were collected. All of the patients had a prior cancer and had received radiotherapy to the region in which the malignant mesothelioma developed. Data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program and the Connecticut Tumor Registry were evaluated for cases of malignant mesothelioma of the pleura occurring in patients with a previous cancer. The literature on post-irradiation malignant mesotheliomas was reviewed. RESULTS: Eight patients (4 men, 4 women) with malignant mesothelioma occurring in sites of radiotherapy for a prior tumor were identified. The mean age at diagnosis of mesothelioma was 45 years (range: 22-78 years), and the average interval between radiotherapy and the mesothelioma was 21 years (range: 11-29 years). Three of the patients had also received chemotherapy. Histologically, the mesotheliomas were epithelial in five cases, biphasic in one, and sarcomatous in one. One hundred forty-two patients were identified in the epidemiologic survey. The majority were men (89%), with a mean age for all patients of 68.5 years (range: 35-86 years) and a median latency between first cancer and mesothelioma of 4.3 years (range: 2 months-29.9 years). CONCLUSIONS: Mesotheliomas rarely develop as second malignant neoplasms. Within a large, population-based survey of patients with cancer, temporal patterns and demographic features of most second primary mesotheliomas were similar to asbestos-related tumors, although the late effects of cancer treatment might have contributed to the occurrence of cancer in some patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Trends in breast conserving surgery among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, 1992-2000.

BACKGROUND: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) has been the recommended treatment for early-stage breast cancer since 1990 yet many women still do not receive this procedure. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between birthplace and use of BCS in Asian-American and Pacific-Islander (AAPI) women, and to determine whether disparities between white and AAPI women persist over time. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Women with newly diagnosed stage I or II breast cancer from 1992 to 2000 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. OUTCOME: Receipt of breast -conserving surgery for initial treatment of stage I or II breast cancer. MAIN RESULTS: Overall, AAPI women had lower rates of BCS than white women (47% vs 59%; P<.01). Foreign-born AAPI women had lower rates of BCS than U.S.-born AAPI and white women (43% vs 56% vs 59%; P<.01). After adjustment for age, marital status, tumor registry, year of diagnosis, stage at diagnosis, tumor size, histology, grade, and hormone receptor status, foreign-born AAPI women (adjusted OR [aOR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.76) and U.S.-born AAPI women (aOR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.95) had lower odds of receiving BCS than white women. Use of BCS increased over time for each racial/ethnic group; however, foreign-born AAPI women had persistently lower rates of BCS than non-Hispanic white women. CONCLUSIONS: AAPI women, especially those who are foreign born, are less likely to receive BCS than non-Hispanic white women. Of particular concern, differences in BCS use among foreign-born and U.S.-born AAPI women and non-Hispanic white women have persisted over time. These differences may reflect inequities in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer for AAPI women, particularly those born abroad.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Regional differences in the incidence and treatment of carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Greater use of mammography in the United States in recent years has increased the detection of early neoplasms of the breast, including carcinoma in situ. However, the occurrence and treatment of diagnosed carcinoma in situ of the breast has not been fully described. Our goal was to examine temporal, geographic, and demographic patterns in the incidence and treatment of in situ breast cancer. The study included data from all women with in situ breast cancer that had been detected in the nine Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results areas of the United States from 1975 through 1990 (Surveillance Program, Cancer Statistics Branch, Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, November, 1993). We calculated age-adjusted incidence rates (1970 United States standard) using data on histology and treatment from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data tape. We assessed predictors of treatment by mastectomy using multiple logistic regression. From 1975-1979 to 1986-1990, the age-adjusted incidence rate of in situ breast cancer increased from 4.7 to 16.9/100,000 women. The increase occurred in all age groups and among both white and black women. However, there was nearly a 2-fold difference in incidence rates across geographic areas in 1986-1990, ranging from < 12/100,000 in Iowa and New Mexico to > 20/100,000 in San Francisco and Seattle. Geographic variability in treatment was also evident, with mastectomy, rather than breast-conserving therapy, performed on 46% of the women with in situ breast cancer in San Francisco and on 66% of those in Iowa. The incidence of diagnosed in situ breast cancer increased markedly during the 1980s, and there was substantial geographic variability in the rates of detection of these tumors and in the type of therapy received. Although mastectomy became a less common treatment over time, it was still performed on a high proportion of women with in situ breast cancer during the latter part of the decade.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Rates of colon and rectal cancers are increasing in young adults.

Incidence rates for colorectal cancer are decreasing in the United States, possibly due to preventative cancer screening. Because these programs target older patients, their beneficial effects may not apply to young patients. The purpose of this study was to compare incidence rates and tumor characteristics of colon and rectal cancers for young versus older patients using a population-based cancer registry. Colon and rectal cancer patients reported in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry (1973-1999) were separately analyzed. Incidence rates over time, stage, and grade were compared for two age groups: young patients (20-40 years, n = 5383) and older patients (60+ years, n = 256,401). For older patients, colon cancer incidence remained stable while rectal cancer incidence decreased 11 per cent to 72.1/100,000 persons (P < 0.05). For the young, colon cancer incidence increased 17 per cent to 2.1 (P < 0.05), and rectal incidence rose 75 per cent to 1.4 (P < 0.05). Young patients had less localized tumors than older patients: colon (25.8% vs. 35.3%, P < 0.001); rectal (38.4% vs. 41.7%, P = 0.005). Young patients also had more poorly differentiated tumors: colon (22.2% vs. 14.7%, P < 0.001); rectal (16.4% vs. 12.3%, P < 0.001). Incidence rates for colon and rectal cancers in young patients are rising, and they have more advanced disease. Although the overall prevalence is low in this population, the increasing incidence suggests health-care providers should have heightened awareness when caring for this population.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Long-term cancer patient survival in the United States.

Although survival rates are useful for monitoring progress in the early detection and treatment of cancer and are of particular interest to patients with new diagnoses, there are limited population-based estimates of long-term survival rates. We used data collected by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program for cases diagnosed during 1974-1991 and followed through 1992 to estimate relative survival at 5, 10, and 15 years after diagnosis of cancer of the breast, prostate, colon and rectum, and lung. Relative survival after diagnosis of breast and prostate cancer continued to decline up through 15 years after diagnosis, whereas survival after diagnosis of lung and colon or rectal cancer remained approximately constant after 5 and 10 years, respectively. Age-specific patterns of survival varied by site, stage, and demographics. Among patients with localized breast and prostate cancer, women who were younger than age 45 at breast cancer diagnosis and men who were 75 years and older at prostate cancer diagnosis had the poorest relative survival. Relative survival among lung cancer patients decreased with age at diagnosis, regardless of stage or demographics, and age-specific patterns of relative survival for patients with cancer of the colon and rectum differed according to race. Among white patients diagnosed with cancers of the colon and rectum, relative survival did not vary by age at diagnosis; among black patients older than 45 at diagnosis, relative survival decreased with age. This study provides population-based estimates of long-term survival and confirms black/white, male/female, and stage- and age-specific differences for the major cancers.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Survival variability by race and ethnicity in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

CONTEXT: The role of race/ethnicity in survival of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is unclear, with some studies reporting poorer survival among minority children and others reporting equivalent survival across race/ethnicity in the modern, risk-stratified treatment era. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relation between race/ethnicity and survival in a large, population-based analysis of incident ALL cases in the United States. DESIGN, POPULATION, AND SETTING: This study included 4952 individuals diagnosed with ALL between 1973 and 1999 at age 19 years or younger. ALL cases were identified from 9 population-based registries of the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival probabilities were compared among white, black, Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaskan Native children. Kaplan-Meier curves and proportional hazard ratios from Cox regression analysis were calculated, accounting for treatment era (1973-1982, 1983-1989, and 1990-1999), age at diagnosis (<1, 1-9, and 10-19 years), and sex. RESULTS: Although overall 5-year survival probabilities improved with each successive treatment era, differences according to race/ethnicity persisted. For 1990-1999, 5-year survival was 84% for white children, 81% for Asian/Pacific Islander children, 75% for black children, and 72% for both American Indian/Alaskan Native children and Hispanic children. The largest difference by race/ethnicity was observed among children diagnosed between ages 1 and 9 years. Compared with white children, after adjusting for treatment era, age at diagnosis, and sex, children of black, Hispanic, and American Indian/Alaskan Native descent had hazard ratios of 1.50 (95% CI, 1.0-2.2; P =.03), 1.83 (95% CI, 1.4-2.4; P<.001), and 1.90 (95% CI, 0.8-4.6; P =.16). CONCLUSIONS: Black, Hispanic, and American Indian/Alaskan Native children with ALL have worse survival than white and Asian/Pacific Islander children, even in the contemporary treatment era. Future work must delineate the social and biological factors, including any differences in pharmacokinetics associated with chemotherapeutic agents, that account for disparities in outcome.

Adolescent↗