Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Repression domains”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 685 records · Page 38Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Selective repression of transcriptional activators by Pbx1 does not require the homeodomain.

PBX1 is a homeobox-containing gene identified as the chromosome 1 participant of the t(1;19) chromosomal translocation of childhood pre-B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. This translocation produces a fusion gene encoding the chimeric oncoprotein E2A-Pbx1, which can induce both acute myeloid and T-lymphoid leukemia in mice. The binding of Pbx1 to DNA is weak; however, both Pbx1 and E2A-Pbx1 exhibit tight binding to specific DNA motifs in conjunction with certain other homeodomain proteins, and E2A-Pbx1 activates transcription through these motifs, whereas Pbx1 does not. In this report, we investigate potential transcriptional functions of Pbx1, using transient expression assays. While no segments of Pbx1 activated transcription, an internal domain of Pbx1 repressed transcription induced by the activation domain of Sp1, but not by the activation domains of VP16 or p53. This Pbx1 domain, which lies upstream of the homeodomain and is highly conserved among Pbx proteins, is thus predicted to bind a specific transcription factor. Surprisingly, the repression activity of Pbx1 did not require homeodomain-dependent DNA binding. Thus, Pbx1 may be able to alter gene transcription by both DNA-binding-dependent and DNA-binding-independent mechanisms.

Cells, Cultured↗
PubMed2003

Fusion protein of retinoic acid receptor alpha with promyelocytic leukemia protein or promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger protein recruits N-CoR-TBLR1 corepressor complex to repress transcription in vivo.

Fusion proteins of retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARalpha) with promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML-RARalpha) or with promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger protein (PLZF-RARalpha) are associated with and likely responsible for the development of acute promyelocytic leukemia. These oncoproteins retain the ability to bind DNA and retinoic acid through the RARalpha moiety. This enables them to repress RARalpha target genes in the absence of retinoic acid, but the underlying mechanisms remain to be investigated. Here we use the frog oocyte system to study transcriptional regulation by PML-RARalpha and PLZF-RARalpha in the context of chromatin. We first show that the endogenous corepressor N-CoR forms a complex with TBLR1 (transducin beta-like protein 1-related protein) and that both N-CoR and TBLR1 can interact with unliganded PML-RARalpha and PLZF-RARalpha in vivo. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation, we demonstrate that both oncoproteins recruit TBLR1, as well as N-CoR, to its target promoter, leading to histone deacetylation and transcriptional repression. Furthermore, expression of a dominant negative N-CoR that contains the TBLR1-interacting domain blocks transcription repression by unliganded PML-RARalpha and PLZF-RARalpha. Thus, our studies provide in vivo evidence for targeted recruitment of N-CoR-TBLR1 complexes by PML-RARalpha and PLZF-RARalpha in transcriptional repression in the context of chromatin.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2001

Differential control of gene activity by isoforms A, B1 and B2 of the Drosophila ecdysone receptor.

The steroid hormone ecdysone initiates molting and metamorphosis in Drosophila via a heterodimeric receptor consisting of EcR that binds hormone, and USP, a homolog of the vertebrate RXR receptor. EcR exists in three isoforms EcRA, EcRB1 and EcRB2 that are thought to direct specific physiological responses to ecdysone. These three isoforms differ only in their N-terminal A/B domain that implies that sequences responsible for the differential physiological effects lie within the A/B domains of the EcR isoforms. In the present study, we set out to determine the capability of the three isoforms and their A/B domains to control gene transcription. When full-length EcR plasmids were cotransfected into mammalian cells with a USP expressing and a cognate reporter plasmid, the three EcR isoforms showed striking differences in their ability to control gene transcription, both in the presence and in the absence of hormone. Furthermore, the A/B domains of EcRB1 and of EcRB2 when fused to the GAL4 DNA binding domain are sufficient to activate transcription of a reporter gene, in yeast as well as in mammalian cells. In contrast, a fusion construct containing the A/B domain of EcRA represses basal transcription of the reporter gene. All these findings emphasize the importance of the A/B domains of the three EcR isoforms for differentially controlling gene transcription. Furthermore, they provide evidence for the existence of an autonomous ligand-independent activation function (AF1) in the A/B domains of EcRB1 and EcRB2 and of an inhibitory function (IF) in the A/B domain of EcRA.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1992

Identification of a non-basic domain in the histone H4 N-terminus required for repression of the yeast silent mating loci.

We have shown previously that a stretch of four charged residues (16-19) at the histone H4 N-terminus is involved in repression of the yeast silent mating loci. One of these residues, Lys16, is a site for acetylation, which may prevent repression of the silent mating loci. In this paper we ask whether other sequences in histone H4, possibly in conjunction with H3 residues, are required for repression. We find that even in combination, the other seven acetylatable lysines in H3 and H4 do not function in repression. In contrast, we have found that an adjacent relatively uncharged domain (residues 21-29) is required for repression and that single amino acid insertions and deletions in this region are extremely detrimental. We propose that the basic and non-basic domains together form a DNA (or protein) induced amphipathic alpha-helix required in the formation of a repressive chromatin structure.

Acetylation↗
PubMed1992

Hormonal regulation of the nuclear localization signals of the human glucocorticosteroid receptor.

Nuclear localization of the rat glucocorticosteroid receptor (rGR) transiently expressed in COS-7 cells appears to be mediated by two nuclear localization signals, NL1 and NL2, in a hormone-dependent mechanism. We investigated the intracellular distribution of the human GR (hGR) expressed in COS-7 cells, by a different immunohistochemical technique involving immunostaining of cell pellet sections, thus avoiding the use of cell permeabilizing agents and allowing rigorous comparison between successive experiments. With a large set of hGR mutants, we could define determinants of the hGR nuclear localization and compare them with those previously reported for rGR. Our study demonstrated two hormone-dependent nuclear localization signals. NL1 activity, overlapping the DNA-binding domain (DBD)-hinge boundary, was repressed by the unliganded ligand-binding domain (LBD), even if the repressed NL1 retained a residual potency to target hGR in the nucleus. Structure/function analysis suggested a bipartite structure of NL1, analogous to that of other nuclear targeting signals (the carboxy-terminal part of DBD between amino acids 478 and 487 and the beginning of the hinge region which includes a basic amino acid stretch between 491 and 498). Upon hormone binding, NL2, located in the LBD, was activated, but was unable by itself to sustain full nuclear localization, which required the derepressed NL1 activity. Only two sequences in the LBD, localized between amino acids 600 and 626 and from amino acid 696 up to the carboxyl-terminal amino acid 777, respectively, were found to inhibit NL1 activity. As previously reported, efficient nuclear retention, mandatory for gene expression, did not required DNA-binding activity. The controversial intracellular localization of the unliganded form of hGR and the role of hsp90 in cytoplasmic localization are further discussed.

Cell Line↗
PubMed2003

Expression of a truncated Sall1 transcriptional repressor is responsible for Townes-Brocks syndrome birth defects.

Townes-Brocks syndrome (TBS, OMIM #107480) is an autosomal dominant disorder that causes multiple birth defects including renal, ear, anal and limb malformations. Mutations in SALL1 have been postulated to cause TBS by haploinsufficiency; however, a mouse model carrying a sall1-null allele does not mimic the human syndrome. Since the mutations that cause TBS could express a truncated SALL1 protein containing the domain necessary for transcriptional repression but lacking the complete DNA binding domain, we hypothesized that TBS is due to dominant-negative or gain-of-function activity of a mutant protein. To test this hypothesis, we have created a mutant allele, sall1-DeltaZn2-10, that produces a truncated protein and recapitulates the abnormalities found in human TBS. Heterozygous mice mimic TBS patients by displaying high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss, renal cystic hypoplasia and wrist bone abnormalities. Homozygous sall1-DeltaZn2-10 mutant mice exhibit more severe defects than sall1-null mice including complete renal agenesis, exencephaly, limb and anal deformities. We demonstrate that truncated Sall1 mediates interaction with all Sall family members and could interfere with the normal function of all Sall proteins. These data support a model for the pathogenesis of TBS in which expression of a truncated SALL1 protein causes abnormal development of multiple organs.

Abnormalities, Multiple↗
PubMed1996

Repression of human heat shock factor 1 activity at control temperature by phosphorylation.

Human heat shock transcription factor 1 (HSF1) is responsible for stress-induced transcription of heat shock protein genes. The activity of the HSF1 transcriptional activation domains is modulated by a separate regulatory domain, which confers repression at control temperature and heat inducibility. We show here that two specific proline-directed serine motifs are important for function of the regulatory domain: Mutation of these serines to alanine derepresses HSF1 activity at control temperature, and mutation to glutamic acid, mimicking a phosphorylated serine, results in normal repression at control temperature and normal heat shock inducibility. Tryptic mapping shows that these serines are the major phosphorylation sites of HSF1 at control temperature in vivo. Stimulation of the Raf/ERK pathway in vivo results in an increased level of phosphorylation of these major sites and the regulatory domain is an excellent substrate in vitro for the mitogen-activated MAPK/ERK. We conclude that phosphorylation of the regulatory domain of HSF1 decreases the activity of HSF1 at control temperature, and propose a mechanism for modification of HSF1 activity by growth control signals.

Calcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinases↗
PubMed2004

Activated p53 suppresses the histone methyltransferase EZH2 gene.

Replicative senescence is an irreversible cell cycle arrest that limits the proliferation of damaged cells and may be an important tumor suppression mechanism in vivo. This process is regulated at critical steps by the tumor suppressor p53. To identify genes that may regulate the senescence process, we performed cDNA microarray analysis of gene expression in senescent, young proliferating, and hTERT-immortalized primary human fibroblasts. The histone methyltransferase (HMTase), EZH2, was specifically downregulated in senescent cells. Activated p53 suppressed EZH2 gene expression through repression of the EZH2 gene promoter. This activity of p53 requires intact p53 transactivation and DNA binding domains. Furthermore, the repression of EZH2 promoter by p53 is dependent on p53 transcriptional target p21(Waf1) inactivating RB/E2F pathways. In addition, the knockdown of EZH2 expression retards cell proliferation and induces G2/M arrest. We suggest that the p53-dependent suppression of EZH2 expression is a novel pathway that contributes to p53-mediated G2/M arrest. EZH2 associated complex possesses HMTase activity and is involved in epigenetic regulation. Activated p53 suppresses EZH2 expression, suggesting a further role for p53 in epigenetic regulation and in the maintenance of genetic stability. Suppression of EZH2 expression in tumors by p53 may lead to novel approaches to control cancer progression.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2003

Nlz belongs to a family of zinc-finger-containing repressors and controls segmental gene expression in the zebrafish hindbrain.

The zebrafish nlz gene has a rostral expression limit at the presumptive rhombomere (r) 3/r4 boundary during gastrula stages, and its expression progressively expands rostrally to encompass both r3 and r2 by segmentation stages, suggesting a role for nlz in hindbrain development. We find that Nlz is a nuclear protein that associates with the corepressor Groucho, suggesting that Nlz acts to repress transcription. Consistent with a role as a repressor, misexpression of nlz causes a loss of gene expression in the rostral hindbrain, likely due to ectopic nlz acting prematurely in this domain, and this repression is accompanied by a partial expansion in the expression domains of r4-specific genes. To interfere with endogenous nlz function, we generated a form of nlz that lacks the Groucho binding site and demonstrate that this construct has a dominant negative effect. We find that interfering with endogenous Nlz function promotes the expansion of r5 and, to a lesser extent, r3 gene expression into r4, leading to a reduction in the size of r4. We conclude that Nlz is a transcriptional repressor that controls segmental gene expression in the hindbrain. Lastly, we identify additional nlz-related genes, suggesting that Nlz belongs to a family of zinc-finger proteins.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Temporal recruitment of the mSin3A-histone deacetylase corepressor complex to the ETS domain transcription factor Elk-1.

The transcriptional status of eukaryotic genes is determined by a balance between activation and repression mechanisms. The nuclear hormone receptors represent classical examples of transcription factors that can regulate this balance by recruiting corepressor and coactivator complexes in a ligand-dependent manner. Here, we demonstrate that the equilibrium between activation and repression via a single transcription factor, Elk-1, is altered following activation of the Erk mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. In addition to its C-terminal transcriptional activation domain, Elk-1 contains an N-terminal transcriptional repression domain that can recruit the mSin3A-histone deacetylase 1 corepressor complex. Recruitment of this corepressor is enhanced in response to activation of the Erk pathway in vivo, and this recruitment correlates kinetically with the shutoff of one of its target promoters, c-fos. Elk-1 therefore undergoes temporal activator-repressor switching and contributes to both the activation and repression of target genes following growth factor stimulation.

Biological Transport, Active↗
PubMed2006

Positive regulatory domain I-binding factor 1 mediates repression of the MHC class II transactivator (CIITA) type IV promoter.

MHC class II transactivator (CIITA), a co-activator that controls MHC class II (MHC II) transcription, functions as the master regulator of MHC II expression. Persistent activity of the CIITA type III promoter (pIII), one of the four potential promoters of this gene, is responsible for constitutive expression of MHC II by B lymphocytes. In addition, IFN-gamma induces expression of CIITA in these cells through the type IV promoter (pIV). Positive regulatory domain 1-binding factor 1 (PRDI-BF1), called B lymphocyte-induced maturation protein 1 (Blimp-1) in mice, represses the expression of CIITA pIII in plasma and multiple myeloma cells. To investigate regulation of CIITA pIV expression by PRDI-BF1 in the B lymphocyte lineage, protein/DNA-binding studies, and functional promoter analyses were performed. PRDI-BF1 bound to the IFN regulatory factor-element (IRF-E) site in CIITA pIV. Ectopic expression of either PRDI-BF1 or Blimp-1 repressed this promoter in B lymphocytes. In vitro binding and functional analyses of CIITA pIV demonstrated that the IRF-E is the target of this repression. In vivo genomic footprint analysis demonstrated protein binding at the IRF-E site of CIITA pIV in U266 myeloma cells, which express PRDI-BF1. PRDI-BF1beta, a truncated form of PRDI-BF1 that is co-expressed in myeloma cells, also bound to the IRF-E site and repressed CIITA pIV. These findings demonstrate for the first time that, in addition to silencing expression of CIITA pIII in B lymphocytes, PRDI-BF1 is capable of binding and suppressing CIITA pIV.

B-Lymphocytes↗
PubMed1994

c-Jun represses transcription of the human chorionic gonadotropin alpha and beta genes through distinct types of CREs.

Chorionic gonadotropin (CG) is a heterodimeric placental hormone encoded by separate alpha and beta subunit genes that is essential for the maintenance of pregnancy. The production of CG is stimulated by DNA synthesis inhibitors and by cAMP. The present study demonstrates that the proto-oncogene c-jun represses transcription of the human CG alpha and CG beta promoters. c-Jun repressed the CG alpha promoter through a canonical cAMP response element (CRE) that is known to bind c-Jun and other members of the B-Zip transcription factor family. In the CG beta promoter, two adjacent sites, CRE1 (-299 to -289) and CRE2 (-240 to -219), conveyed cAMP responsiveness via sequences that are distinct from the canonical element, TGACGTCA. Mutations within CG beta CRE1 or CRE2 reduced or abolished, respectively, c-Jun-mediated repression. Although the CG beta CREs do not contain consensus sequences previously described to bind c-Jun, CRE2 bound c-Jun and c-Fos in electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Supershift assays, using anti-JUN antibody, demonstrated that Jun formed part of the native complex that binds the CRE2 in JEG-3 cells. A series of c-Jun mutants were used to analyze the transcription factor domains required for repression of the CG subunit promoters. The DNA binding and leucine zipper domains of c-Jun as well as the amino terminus, were required for repression of both subunit promoters. Thus, both the CG alpha and CG beta genes are repressed by c-Jun through promoter regions that convey cAMP-induced transcription, although these DNA sequences are unrelated.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2001

Repression of activator protein-1-mediated transcriptional activation by the Notch-1 intracellular domain.

Developmental decisions that control cell fate are commonly regulated by the Notch signaling pathway. Activation of transmembrane Notch receptors results in proteolytic liberation of the intracellular domain of Notch, which translocates into the nucleus, binds a repressor (C promoter binding factor 1/RBP-Jkappa, Su(H), and Lag-1 (CSL)), and induces target genes. We found that the intracellular domain of human Notch-1 (NIC-1) represses activator protein-1 (AP-1)-mediated transactivation. Because numerous genes that control immune and inflammatory responses are AP-1-dependent and Notch regulates immune cell function, we investigated the underlying molecular mechanisms. Repression of AP-1 by NIC-1 did not represent a general inhibitory effect on transcription because nuclear factor kappaB-dependent transcription and transcription driven by a constitutive promoter and enhancer were not affected by NIC-1. The physiological relevance of the repression was supported by the facts that repression was apparent in multiple cell lines, endogenous AP-1 target genes were repressed, and similar concentrations of NIC-1 were required for CSL-dependent activation and AP-1 repression. The RBP-Jkappa-associated molecule domain of NIC-1 that mediates CSL binding and distinct sequences necessary for transactivation were required for repression. However, there was not a strict correlation between the sequence requirements for CSL-dependent activation and AP-1 repression. Repression correlated with predominant nuclear localization of NIC-1 and was not accompanied by disruption of c-Jun amino-terminal kinase-dependent signaling events required for AP-1 activation or by defective AP-1 DNA binding activity. These results provide evidence for negative cross-talk between Notch and AP-1, which may have important consequences for controlling diverse biological processes.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1993

Deletion of the SH3 domain of Src interferes with regulation by the phosphorylated carboxyl-terminal tyrosine.

A current model for the regulation of the Src protein-tyrosine kinase proposes that the COOH-terminal phosphotyrosine, Tyr-527, binds to the Src homology 2 (SH2) region in an intramolecular interaction that represses the kinase domain. This model is consistent with the activation of Src by mutations in the SH2 domain or COOH terminus. Mutations in the SH3 domain also activate Src, although this region is not thought to bind phosphotyrosine. Seidel-Dugan et al. (Seidel-Dugan, C., Meyer, B. E., Thomas, S. M., and Brugge, J. S. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 1835-1845) have shown that Src mutants with deletions in the SH2 or SH3 domain transform chicken embryo fibroblasts and have increased kinase activity. These mutant proteins are underphosphorylated at Tyr-527, a change that could in itself activate the mutants. Therefore, it is not possible to distinguish whether the SH2 and SH3 domains are needed for phosphorylation of Tyr-527 or for Src to adopt or maintain the repressed state. We have artificially increased the level of Tyr-527 phosphorylation of SH2 and SH3 deletion mutants by coexpressing them with the Tyr-527 kinase, Csk, in yeast cells. We find that both the SH2 and SH3 domains are needed for inhibition of Src by Csk. The SH2 domain is needed for efficient phosphorylation by Csk, both in yeast cells and in vitro. The SH3 domain is needed for Src to be inhibited when Tyr-527 is phosphorylated by Csk. This suggests that the SH3 domain cooperates with the SH2 domain and phosphorylated Tyr-527 to inhibit the kinase domain. Dephosphorylation of SH3 domain mutants at Tyr-527 in fibroblasts could be a consequence of a failure of the proposed SH2/phosphotyrosine interaction.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Krüppel-associated box-mediated repression of RNA polymerase II promoters is influenced by the arrangement of basal promoter elements.

The evolutionarily conserved Krüppel-associated box (KRAB) is present in the N-terminal regions of more than one-third of all Krüppel-class zinc finger proteins. Recent experiments have demonstrated that the KRAB-A domain tethered to a promoter DNA by connecting to heterologous DNA-binding protein domain or targeted to a promoter-proximal RNA sequence acts as a transcriptional silencing of RNA polymerase II promoters. Here we show that expression of KRAB domain suppresses in vivo the activating function of various defined activating transcription factors, and we demonstrate that the KRAB domain specifically silences the activity of promoters whose initiation is dependent on the presence of a TATA box. Promoters whose accurate transcription initiation is directed by a pyrimidine-rich initiator element, however, are relatively unaffected. We also report in vitro transcription experiments indicating that the KRAB domain is able to repress both activated and basal promoter activity. Thus, the KRAB domain appears to repress the activity of certain promoters through direct communication with TATA box-dependent basal transcription machinery.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2001

Dual mechanisms for repression of the monomeric orphan receptor liver receptor homologous protein-1 by the orphan small heterodimer partner.

The orphan nuclear hormone receptor liver receptor homologous protein-1 (LRH-1; NR5A2, also known as FTF), an unusual receptor that binds DNA as a monomer, is an essential regulator of expression of a rate-limiting enzyme in bile acid formation, cholesterol 7-alpha-hydroxylase. In a classic negative feedback loop that is a crucial component of the complex regulation of cholesterol metabolism, cholesterol 7-alpha-hydroxylase expression is decreased when bile acid levels are high. This repression is thought to be based on the bile acid-dependent induction of expression of the orphan receptor small heterodimer partner (SHP) NR0B2, which inhibits the activity of LRH-1. We have explored the molecular basis for this important regulatory effect by characterizing the mechanisms by which mouse and human SHP inhibit LRH-1-mediated transactivation. Both SHP proteins specifically interact with the AF-2 transactivation domain of LRH-1 both in vivo and in vitro. This domain is a common target for coactivator interaction, and the SHP proteins can compete with p160 coactivators for binding to LRH-1. In addition to the N-terminal receptor interaction domain, SHP includes a C-terminal domain with autonomous repression function. Neither a deletion nor a point mutation specifically affecting this domain blocked the ability to interact with LRH-1 to compete for coactivator binding or to repress LRH-1 transactivation. However, the relative ability of these mutants to inhibit LRH-1-mediated transactivation was markedly decreased. We conclude that the proposed central role of SHP in cholesterol metabolism is based on a two-step mechanism that is dependent on both coactivator competition and direct transcriptional repression.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Regulatory domain of human heat shock transcription factor-2 is not regulated by hemin or heat shock.

Heat shock transcription factor 2 (HSF-2) activates transcription of heat shock proteins in response to hemin in the human erythroleukemia cell line, K562. To understand the regulation of HSF-2 activation, a series of deletion mutants of HSF-2 fused to the GAL-4 DNA binding domain were generated. We have found that human HSF-2 has a regulatory domain located in the carboxyl-terminal portion of the protein which represses the activity of its activation domain under normal physiological conditions. The repressive effects of this domain can be eliminated by its deletion in GAL4-HSF-2 fusion constructs. The regulatory domain of HSF-2 can also repress a heterologous chimeric activator that contains a portion of the VP16 activation domain. The activation domain of HSF-2 is a segment of approximately 77 amino acids located proximal to the carboxyl-terminal hydrophobic heptad repeat (leucine zipper 4) of the molecule. Interestingly, the GAL4-HSF-2 fusion protein and the 77 amino acids activation domain are inactive and are not activated by pretreatment of cells with either hemin or elevated temperature. Our data suggest that regulation of HSF-2 differs from HSF-1 in that its regulatory domain is not responsive to hemin or heat directly.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2000

Transcriptional activation by the Ewing's sarcoma (EWS) oncogene can be cis-repressed by the EWS RNA-binding domain.

The Ewing's sarcoma (EWS) oncogene contains an N-terminal transcriptional activation domain (EWS activation domain, EAD) and a C-terminal RNA-binding domain (RBD). Although it has been established that the EAD is a potent trans-activation domain that is required for the oncogenic activity of several EWS fusion proteins (EFPs), the precise function of the RBD and the normal role of intact EWS are poorly characterized. Here we show that a cis-linked RBD can strongly and specifically repress trans-activation by the EAD. Fusion proteins containing the RBD are expressed at normal levels, are nuclear-localized, and can bind to DNA both in vitro and in vivo, demonstrating that the RBD represses trans-activation directly at the promoter. The RNA recognition motif within the RBD is not required for repression, whereas regions of the RBD containing multiple RGG motifs play a critical role. The finding that the RBD can antagonize transcriptional activation by EWS provides the first direct evidence of a role for the RBD in transcription. Further studies of the repression phenomenon should illuminate key molecular interactions that distinguish EWS from EFPs and provide insights into the normal cellular function of EWS.

Cell Line↗