Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Perforations”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 685 records · Page 38Linked to original sources

Costs of treating bleeding and perforated peptic ulcers in The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: Gastrointestinal toxicity of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs includes perforations and bleeds. Several preventive strategies are being tested for cost-effectiveness, but little is known about the costs of the complications they are trying to prevent. We estimated the direct costs of hospital treatment of bleeding and perforated ulcers in a university hospital, from data in discharge letters and the hospital management information system. METHODS: Eligible patients had been treated in the VU University Medical Center between January 1997 and August 2000 for an ulcer bleed or perforation (International Classification of Diseases code 531-4). Resource use comprised hospitalization days and diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Insurance claim prices determined the costs from the payers' perspective. In a secondary analysis we excluded resource use that was clearly related to the treatment of comorbid illness. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients with a bleeding (n = 35) or perforated ulcer (n = 15) or both (n = 3) were studied, including 14 with comorbidity; 22 complications occurred in the stomach, 29 in the duodenum, one in both stomach and duodenum, and one after partial gastrectomy. A simultaneous bleed and perforation was most expensive (26,000 euro), followed by perforation (19,000 euro) and bleeding (12,000 euro). A bleed in the duodenum was more expensive than in the stomach (13,000 euro vs 10,000 euro), while the opposite was seen for perforations (13,000 euro vs 21,000 euro). Comorbidity increased costs substantially: even after correction for procedures unrelated to the ulcer complication, comorbidity more than doubled the costs of treatment. CONCLUSION: Treatment of complicated ulcers is expensive, especially in patients with comorbid conditions.

Adult↗

Can duodenal ulcer perforation be linked to herpes simplex virus infection?

BACKGROUND: Both Herpes simplex infection and duodenal ulcer recur frequently, tend to remain localized, and show remissions and exacerbations. Published data on a link between the two are contradictory, and there are no data on the association of Herpes simplex infection with perforated duodenal ulcer. METHODS: 187 patients in four groups were studied: group I--controls (n = 35), group II--non-ulcer dyspepsia (n = 35), group III--chronic non-perforated duodenal ulcer (n = 35), and group IV--perforated duodenal ulcer (n = 82). Titers of IgG antibodies against HSV-1 and HSV-2 were determined using enzyme immunoassays. RESULTS: The seropositivity rate for both HSV-1 (80%) and HSV-2 (77%) was high in the control population. Among patients with perforated duodenal ulcer, antibodies against HSV-1 (94%) but not those against HSV-2 (83%), were found more frequently than in groups I and III. HSV-1 seropositivity was significantly higher in patients with a short duration of preperforation symptoms. Absolute titers for both anti-HSV-1 and anti-HSV-2 were higher in patients with perforated duodenal ulcer than in controls and those with chronic non-perforated duodenal ulcer. CONCLUSION: Herpes simplexvirus, especially HSV-1, may have a role in the causation of perforated duodenal ulcers.

Duodenal Ulcer↗

Perforated duodenal ulcer at seven years after heart-renal transplantation: a case report.

We experienced a rare case of perforated duodenal ulcer that occurred at seven years after heart-kidney transplantation. This patient is reported here together with a discussion of the etiology, the selection of treatment, and perioperative management. The patient was a 46-year-old man who presented with precordial pain. In 1995, he had undergone simultaneous heart and kidney transplantation in the United States and had been on long-term immunosuppressive and corticosteroid therapy. His precordial pain started from May 24, 2002. He was examined at our hospital on May 27 and underwent emergency surgery with a diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal perforation. A 4-mm perforation was observed on the anterior wall of the duodenal bulb and panperitonitis was also present. Patch closure of the perforation was performed by pulling the omentum over the defect. Perioperative management consisted of his usual immunosuppressants together with antacid therapy. The postoperative course was good and he was discharged on hospital day 15. In this patient, the mechanism of perforation was assumed to involve sudden irritation combined with poor circulation in the duodenum and tissue ischemia, as well as a decrease of mucosal protective factors based on long-term corticosteroid therapy. Perforated duodenal ulcer is a rare problem after heart transplantation. Because the time that elapses after perforation is an important determinant of the prognosis, early diagnosis and appropriate surgical repair are essential.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

[Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer: early postoperative results and risk factors].

BACKGROUND: Clear patient selection criteria and indications for laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers are still of relevance. The purpose of our paper is to describe the early outcome results after this operation and to define the risk factors influencing the genesis of postoperative morbidity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients were operated on laparoscopically between October 1996 and October 2003 for perforated peptic ulcers. Out of them, 47 patients with perforated duodenal ulcers entered the final retrospective analysis. Twenty variables were identified, including the duration of acute symptoms before the operation, shock, underlying medical illness, ulcer size, age, Boey score and the predictive value of these variables for morbidity, conversion rates and hospital stay. The univariate data analysis was originally done using the Fisher exact test, t test, Mann Whitney, ANOVA and F tests. The data was reevaluated using multifactorial analysis with logistic and linear regression tests. RESULTS: Patient's age was 32.0+/-12.4 years. Duration of perforation was 8.0+/-10.8 hours. Shock was diagnosed in one patient (2.1%). High surgical risk according to ASA (III-IV) was estimated in 2 patients (4.3%). Laparoscopic duodenography was completed in 36 patients (76.6%). The other 11 patients (23.4%) underwent a conversion to open repair. Seven patients (19.4%) had postoperative complications. Suture leakage was confirmed in 4 patients (11.1%), and other abdominal complications were observed in 3 patients (8.3%). Pneumonia and pneumothorax were diagnosed in 3 patients. Hospital stay was 7.9+/-5.8 (4-45) days. There was no mortality. Ulcer perforation size >4-10 mm is the only significant risk factor influencing the conversion rate. An increase in the suture leakage rate was most significant with delayed presentation of >or=10 hours (p<0.0001). This risk factor influences both the postoperative pneumonia rate (>or=10 hrs., p=0.026) and hospital stay (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Size of duodenal ulcer perforation and duration of ulcer perforation symptoms were found to be risk factors influencing the rates of conversion to open repair and genesis of postoperative morbidity.

Adolescent↗

Role of Spiral and Multislice Computed Tomography in the evaluation of traumatic and spontaneous oesophageal perforation. Our experience.

PURPOSE: To assess the role CT in the evaluation of traumatic and spontaneous oesophageal perforation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2001 to May 2003, we studied 12 patients (7 males and 5 females; age range: 25-66 years, mean age: 43.5 years) with suspected oesophageal perforation due to motor-vehicle accidents (4 cases), stab wound (one case), post-intubation (2 cases), foreign body ingestion (2 cases) and spontaneous (3 cases). Five patients underwent standard chest and cervical radiography; two patients with suspected foreign body ingestion also underwent a gastrografin swallow study; all of the 12 patients underwent CT of the neck, chest and abdomen before and after intravenous, and in four cases oral, administration of contrast material. RESULTS: In 5 patients with cervical, thoracic and abdominal trauma, the CT examination showed the presence of pleuroparenchymal injury (pneumothorax, pleural effusion and subcutaneous emphysema) as well as findings suggestive of oesophageal perforation: peri-oesophageal air (5 cases), peri-oesophageal fluid (4 cases), oesophageal wall thickening (3 cases), oesophageal wall laceration (2 cases) with abnormal course of the nasogastric tube in one of them and extraluminal extravasation of oral contrast material (2 cases). In 2 patients with post-intubation complications, CT showed the presence of a small peri-oesophageal fluid collection containing small gas bubbles in one case, and a gross perioesophageal abscess-like collection in the second case. In the 2 patients with foreign body ingestion, the plain radiography associated with CT showed the presence of a thin metal object in the cervical region (fragment of a dental plate) and a small extraluminal extravasation of gastrografin in one case, whereas in the other case CT showed the presence of a foreign body (chicken bone) in the hypopharynx with oesophageal wall thickening and peri-oesophageal oedema. In the remaining three patients with suspected spontaneous oesophageal perforation, CT showed the presence of a intramural haematoma in one case, oesophageal fluid distension with gas and a small peri-oesophageal fluid effusion (Mallory-Weiss syndrome) in another, and oesophageal rupture (Boerhaave syndrome) in the last case. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that in patients with suspected traumatic and spontaneous oesophageal perforation, standard cervical and chest radiography may suggest a suspected oesophageal perforation in only a small proportion of cases, whereas oral contrast oesophagography has a higher sensitivity. Through the careful analysis of suggestive and specific signs of oesophageal perforation, a correct CT examination enables an accurate and timely diagnosis which significantly affects prognosis and provides valuable indications for treatment.

Accidents, Traffic↗

Surgical management of perforated duodenal ulcer: the changing scene.

To determine the management of perforated duodenal ulcer at the University Hospital of the West Indies (UHWI) in this era of Helicobacter pylori, the medical records of all patients seen at the UHWI during the period July 1997 to June 2002 with an intra-operative diagnosis of perforated peptic ulcer were reviewed The records were analyzed for the following: age, gender, duration of symptoms, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, smoking status, operative repair duration of hospitalization, Helicobacter pylori status and medical therapy, peri-operative complications, mortality and recurrence. Ninety per cent of the cases were males. All females in whom perforation occurred were age 50 years and older compared to males where 58% of cases presented before age 50 years. Perforations in acute ulcers occurred in 80% of cases. The majority of patients were male smokers. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use was also an important risk factor in elderly females. Simple surgical closure and standard triple therapy antibiotics to eradicate Helicobacter pylori was the most common treatment offered. Mortality was one per cent and follow-up poor but 11% of patients had documented recurrent peptic ulceration. In this study population, perforated duodenal ulcer occured overwhelmingly in males less than 50 years of age. There is a trend towards exclusive simple surgical closure and H pylori eradication at the UHWI for patients with perforated duodenal ulcer but this needs to be supported by documentation of H pylori prevalence in the population of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers.

Adolescent↗

[Roles of epidermal growth factor and its receptor on the chronic tympanic membrane perforations].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the possible roles of epidermal growth factor(EGF) and its receptor (EGFR) on the chronic tympanic membrane perforations. METHODS: A phosphate buffer saline of EGFR was administered to a Gelfoam pledget placed over chronic tympanic membrane perforations in guinea pigs. The EGFR of 10 specimens from the acquired middle ear cholesteatoma of the adjacent skin around perforation was examined by immunohistochemical SP method and computer image analysis. Results Complete closure of the tympanic membrane perforations was observed in 82.6% of EGF-treated ears, but only 33.3% in the controls(P < 0. 01). No case was led to middle ear cholesteatoma in the experiment group (0/23). The positive expression in the adjacent skin around perforation was (39.3 -/+ 7.4)%; and the normal external ear skin was (25.4 +/- 3.7)%; There were distinctly significant differences between the adjacent skin around perforation and the normal external ear skin (P < 0. 01). CONCLUSIONS: EGF is effective on closing chronic tympanic membrane perforations in the guinea pigs. Present data suggests that EGF-treated may induce the occurrence of middle ear cholesteatoma.

Animals↗

Balancing the normal appendectomy rate with the perforated appendicitis rate: implications for quality assurance.

Debate continues as to what should be the appropriate "negative" appendectomy rate for patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. The controversy centers around balancing the complications of appendectomy for a normal appendix with those for a perforated appendix. By using a decision analysis approach to the probable outcomes of appendectomy for a normal appendix, acute appendicitis, and perforated appendicitis, this study provides one answer to this question. These outcomes are based on a review of the results of over 10,000 appendectomies. There is an inverse relationship between the normal appendectomy rate and perforated appendicitis rate. The overall complication rate in patients suspected of having appendicitis improved when the rate of perforated appendicitis was lowered, even if this meant raising the negative appendectomy rate. The perforation rate seemed to level off at approximately 10 per cent. The quality of surgical care delivered to a given population should not be judged solely on the normal appendectomy rate, but this rate should be interpreted in the light of the perforated appendicitis rate. Quality assurance assessments should focus first on perforated appendicitis and only later on normal appendectomy.

Appendectomy↗

[Surgical treatment of iatrogenic perforations of the distal third of the esophagus. Personal experience].

AIM: The esophageal perforations are associated with a high mortality and morbidity when they are not diagnosed and treated quickly. The aim of our study is to analyze the treatment and prognosis of the distal iatrogenic esophageal perforations on the basis of time of onset, concomitant disease and size of perforations. METHODS: The retrospective review was performed on 10 patients treated for distal iatrogenic esophageal perforations at our Institution from 1994 to 2003. The cause of perforations was: pneumatic dilation (7 patients) and esophageal endoprosthesis placing (3 patients). Seven patients presented within 24 h (Group A), and 3 patients presented after 24 h (Group B). In Group A, 4 patients underwent primary repair, 2 patients required esophagectomy and 1 patient was treated conservatively. In Group B, 2 patients were treated conservatively and 1 patient required an esophagectomy. RESULTS: Hospital morbidity was 20% and mortality was 30%. In Group A no patients died. In Group B hospital mortality was 100%. The most common cause of death was multiorgan failure resulting from sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis for esophageal perforations is influenced by the time elapsed between diagnosis and treatment. Esophagectomy is indicated for patients with extensive perforation and necrosis of the esophagus when primary repair cannot be carried out. It is indicated also as treatment for the concomitant disease.

Adult↗

Decision for surgical management of perforation following endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Duodenal perforation resulting from endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) is a serious complication with a high mortality. Diagnosis is often problematic and the optimum treatment is controversial. Eight proven perforations occurred following 441 ES at University of Colorado Hospital, a rate of 1.8 per cent. Physical and laboratory findings were of little diagnostic value, whereas plain abdominal radiographs showed evidence of perforation in 86 per cent. All patients were operated on promptly after diagnosis of perforation. Delay in diagnosis of perforation beyond 24 hours in six patients was associated with a high morbidity and two deaths. Analysis of published series confirmed that delay in diagnosis and delay in operation after perforation were associated with a higher mortality rate than early diagnosis with or without operation. We recommend operative intervention in all patients with clinical evidence of perforation following ES.

Adult↗

[The treatment of perforated gastro-duodenal ulcer].

Seventy-four patients, admitted in emergency for acute perforation of a duodenal or gastric ulcer were reviewed retrospectively: 40 patients with one or several risk factor such as shock, old perforation, severe chronic illness or advanced age and 34 other patients without any risk factor. In this selected population, the surgical treatment, initially performed in 44 cases, consisted of suturing the perforation and draining the peritoneal cavity in all cases but four in which it was associated with a vagotomy (2 cases) or a distal gastrectomy (2 cases). Thirty younger patients admitted without shock, within 6 hours following the onset of the perforation were initially treated by digestive aspiration alone: this medical treatment was successful in 15 patients but required a subsequent laparotomy in the other cases. The overall postoperative mortality is 18% but is zero in the group of patients in whom a medical therapy was initially performed. Long-term follow-up shows that 70% of the patients with a perforated duodenal ulcer and without any anti-inflammatory drug past history at the time of the perforation are free from any symptom. A strategy for the management of perforated duodenal and gastric ulcers, applicable to a non-selected population, is proposed in reference to the surgical literature.

Adult↗

Weber-Christian disease associated with multiple perforations of the ileum and colon.

Panperitonitis developed in a 57-yr-old Japanese man during the course of Weber-Christian disease (WCD). Emergent operation disclosed three perforations of the ascending colon and two of the distal ileum. Histological study of the surgical specimen showed that all perforations were located at the centers of acute subserosal panniculitic foci. No vasculitis was discerned. In the previously reported three cases of WCD with intestinal perforation, perforation was solitary and seen in the small intestine. The cause of perforation was considered to be vasculitis in two cases. In the remaining one, panniculitis around the perforation was in chronic granulomatous stage. This was the first case of WCD in which acute subserosal panniculitis caused multiple ileocolonic perforations.

Acute Disease↗

Unsuspected perforation in bleeding duodenal ulcers.

A combination of bleeding and perforation rarely occurs simultaneously in peptic ulcer disease. The charts of 127 patients undergoing surgery for either complication were reviewed (bleeding, 91; perforation, 36). Nine of 91 (9.9%) patients in the bleeding group were found at operation to have a unsuspected perforated duodenal ulcer. The operative mortality in the patients with the combined complications (44%, 4/9) was significantly higher than that in patients with bleeding alone (8/82, 9.8, P less than 0.001) or those with perforation alone (4/36, 11.00, P less than 0.025). The mean age of nonsurvivors was significantly higher than that of the survivors (74 +/- 8.01 vs 50.4 +/- 5.65 years, P less than 0.005). The duration of symptoms until operation was longer in patients who died (63 +/- 12.7 hours) than in survivors (40.2 +/- 6.02 hours, P = NS). All patients who died, and three of five survivors, had preoperative fever (greater than 99.0 F), leukocytosis (greater than 12,000/mm3), and persistent tachycardia despite adequate hydration and blood replacement. Perforation in bleeding peptic ulcers is not an uncommon finding, and was present in 9.9 per cent of patients. The presenting symptom of bleeding may obscure signs of perforation, delay surgery, and contribute to the higher mortality rate. The presence of fever, leukocytosis, and tachycardia despite adequate fluid and blood replacement warrants a suspicion of perforation in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer.

Adult↗

Appendicitis: the perforation rate when reviewed by decades in a general hospital.

Acute appendicitis at this medical center for 1984 was reviewed and compared with previous studies reporting 1944 and 1964. In 1984, the perforation rate was strikingly higher than the earlier years. It was zero in 1944, rose to 13.6 per cent in 1964, and to 31.4 per cent in 1984. One quarter of perforations in 1984 occurred during the first decade of life. In 1984, 14 per cent (10/70) of all patients with appendicitis were examined by a physician prior to eventual hospitalization; nine had perforated the appendix, representing 41 per cent of all perforations. Major factors responsible for the increase in perforations included (1) an increase in patients less than ten years old (a group at high risk for perforation), and (2) physician or patient delay in hospitalization. We suggest that physician and public education, which has proven effective in the past, should be reinstituted. Critical review of appendicitis should be carried out at individual institutions to identify, and thus, modify trends in this disease. Perforation increases morbidity and cost, yet is easily avoidable.

Adolescent↗

Free perforation in Crohn's disease: a report of 33 cases and review of literature.

Thirty-three patients with free perforation in Crohn's disease are described. There are 14 males and 19 females in this series with ages ranging from 14 to 79 years. The sites of perforation were 22 of the ileum, nine colonic, one jejunal, and one gastroduodenal. Toxic megacolon coexisted in two. Reperforation occurred in three. Free perforation was the presenting sign of the disease in three. Steroid therapy coexisted in 16 patients but in five was administered for less than 10 days before perforation. Obstruction coexisted in only three patients. There were two deaths. Twenty-two patients were treated with resection and diversion, nine patients with resection and drainage, and two with plication only. No relationship between steroid therapy, duration of disease, toxic dilatation, or obstruction with perforation could be established. Resection of the perforated disease segment is necessary when possible. In contradistinction to previous literature, free perforation in Crohn's disease is not as unusual as heretofore believed.

Adolescent↗

Free perforation in Crohn's disease: I. A survey of 99 cases.

A review of more than 181 reported cases of free perforation in Crohn's disease yielded 84 cases that fulfilled rigorous criteria for classification as spontaneous free perforation with generalized peritonitis. An additional 15 cases from The Mount Sinai Hospital, derived from a population of 1010 patients with Crohn's disease, bring the total number to 99. Separately tabulated are 116 other cases either occurring in bypassed segments, developing after surgery, presenting with ruptured abscesses, or not definitively documented. Most reported perforations in the literature occurred in the distal small bowel. Among the Crohn's disease patients in our hospital, however, the incidence of colonic and small bowel perforation were 1.6 and 0.7%, respectively, with the highest frequency actually occurring in diseased segments of jejunum (2/50 = 4%). Free perforation was the presenting manifestation of the disease in 25 of the 84 reported cases. In our 15 patients, although perforation was never the presenting manifestation, it tended to occur early in the course of the disease (mean 3.5 years from onset of symptoms). Ninety-six of the 99 cases were operated on. The three patients treated without surgery all died. Mortality was most frequent following simple suture in the earliest reported case (39%), but considerably less frequent after resection and anastomosis (3.7%). All 18 patients treated by resection and diversion survived. Immediate surgery with resection and/or diversion therefore appears to be appropriate treatment for free perforation in Crohn's disease.

Adolescent↗

Perforation of the gastrointestinal tract and peritonitis in the neonate.

A review of 60 neonates with perforation of the gastrointestinal tract and peritonitis was undertaken to evaluate efficacy of current treatment. Perforation was most frequently associated with necrotizing enterocolitis, spontaneous gastric perforation, intestinal obstruction and feeding tube perforation of the duodenum. Primary closure of proximal gastrointestinal tract perforations and resections with diversion for distal perforations were the commonly used operative procedures. Mortality was 33 per cent, with most deaths (80 per cent) a result of sepsis or its complications. Increased risk of mortality was associated with lower birth weight and lower weight for gestational age, males, initial serum pH less than 7.30, delay in surgical treatment and feeding tube perforation. Peritoneal cultures were dominated by aerobic and facultative organisms with only 21 per cent yielding mixed aerobic-anaerobic cultures. No anaerobes were retrieved from post-operative wound infections or abscesses, and only one of 22 positive blood cultures yielded an anaerobe. Antibiotic therapy included combinations of aminoglycoside beta-lactam antibiotics and clindamycin. Improving survival in this population, particularly in infants less than 1 kilogram birth weight, was demonstrated.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Increased risk of gastrointestinal perforations in neonates mechanically ventilated with either face mask or nasal prongs.

Twenty cases of gastrointestinal perforations not associated with necrotizing enterocolitis or a bowel obstruction (GPNN) were reviewed. Fifteen infants suffered perforations during cycle ventilation. Perforations were localized in the stomach, duodenum, ileum, and jejunum. To determine if the type of mechanical ventilation used (ie, face mask, nasal prongs, or endotracheal tube) was associated with GPNN, a matched case-control analysis was performed. Case and control infants were matched by means of Apgar scores, gestational age, and length of time on ventilatory support. The Mantel-Haenszel estimate for estimating odds-ratios was used to determine that infants ventilated with nasal prongs or face mask were more likely to develop a gastrointestinal perforation than control infants ventilated with endotracheal tubes (odds-ratio greater than or equal to 29.6). This risk was associated with both upper gastrointestinal perforations (odds-ratio greater than or equal to 21.0) and lower gastrointestinal perforations (odds-ratio greater than or equal to 15.3). Routine use of mechanical ventilation with either nasal prongs or face mask appears to be associated with an unacceptable risk of gastrointestinal perforations in sick neonates.

Duodenal Diseases↗