Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Insurance, Disability”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 685 records · Page 38Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

An investigation of the effects of a healthcare provider network on costs and lost time in workers' compensation.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the number of lost time days and cost of workers' compensation claims at a median claim duration (maturity) of 25 months for individuals injured between August 1, 2003, and July 31, 2004, who chose a statewide (Louisiana) network (Omnet Gold) of healthcare providers not subject to utilization review. METHODS: We identified and contrasted 176 lost time claims (143 closed) managed by Omnet Gold (OG) healthcare providers and 1464 lost time claims managed by healthcare providers not participating in OG. RESULTS: The average frequency of lost workdays for a closed OG claim was 53 days versus 99 days for a closed non-OG claim and the average cost of a closed OG claim was 12,554 dollars, whereas the average cost of a closed non-OG claim was 20,400 dollars. Both days lost from work and costs were significantly lower among claims managed by OG healthcare providers. This outcome was consistent with the findings of a previous study performed on the same claims in which a significant difference was demonstrated analyzing primarily open (unresolved) claims with a median claim duration of 6 months. The ability of OG healthcare providers to return a higher proportion of injured workers to work early and shorten claims durations were the major factors influencing these outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In a state where claimants are permitted choice of medical provider, a network of healthcare providers can achieve superior lost time and cost outcomes than out of network healthcare providers.

Disability Evaluation↗
PubMed1995

Disablement resulting from motorcycle crashes.

This retrospective study describes the nature and severity of disablement resulting from motorcycle crashes (both traffic and non-traffic). Two hundred and fifty motorcycle crash victims were randomly selected from the total population of motorcycle crash victims (n = 1510) who had received compensation for disablement in the year ending 31 March 1990. Information on the nature and extent of disablement was obtained from official accident compensation files and coded according to the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. Extremity injuries predominated, especially to the lower limb. The majority of these were fractures. Most commonly impairments occurred in the areas of 'skeletal', 'disfiguring' and 'generalized' impairment. Mechanical impairment of a limb was reported in 68% of cases, often with associated disfigurement. Disability mostly involved problems with locomotion and problems coping with physical stresses at work. Occupational handicap was the most common handicap reported, with mobility handicap the next most common. The shortcomings of this study included its retrospective design and the variable quality of the information on disablement. It was most likely, though, that these factors contributed to an underestimation of disablement in the study group.

Accidents, Traffic↗
PubMed2000

Extension of expiration date for the respiratory body system listings. Social Security Administration (SSA). Final rule.

We adjudicate claims at the third step of our sequential evaluation process for evaluating disability using the Listing of Impairments (the Listings) under the Social Security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) programs. This final rule extends until July 2, 2002, the date on which the respiratory body system listings will no longer be effective. We have made no revisions to the medical criteria in these listings; they remain the same as they now appear in the Code of Federal Regulations. This extension will ensure that we continue to have medical evaluation criteria in the listings to adjudicate claims for disability based on impairments in the respiratory body system at step three of our sequential evaluation process.

Disability Evaluation↗
PubMed2006

Rules for helping blind and disabled individuals achieve self-support. Final rules.

We are amending our regulations to implement section 203 of the Social Security Independence and Program Improvements Act of 1994. Section 203 of this law amended section 1633 of the Social Security Act to require us to establish by regulations criteria for time limits and other criteria related to plans to achieve self-support (PASS). The law requires that we establish criteria for a PASS and that when we set time limits for your PASS, we take into account the length of time that you need to achieve your employment goal, within a reasonable period. A PASS allows some persons who receive or are eligible for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) disability benefits to set aside part of their income and/or resources to meet an employment goal. The income and/or resources you set aside under a PASS will not be counted in determining the amount of your SSI payment or eligibility.

Blindness↗