Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Insurance”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 685 records · Page 38Linked to original sources

Variations in risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rates according to race and health insurance.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between race and insurance and Cesarean delivery rates after adjusting for clinical risk factors that increase the likelihood of cesarean delivery. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study in 21 hospitals in northeast Ohio. SUBJECTS: 25,697 women without prior cesarean deliveries admitted for labor and delivery January 1993 through June 1995. METHODS: Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from patients' medical records. The risk of cesarean delivery was adjusted for 39 maternal and neonatal risk factors that were included in a previously developed risk-adjustment model using nested logistic regression analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds ratios for cesarean delivery in nonwhite patients relative to whites and for patients with government insurance or who were uninsured relative to patients with commercial insurance. RESULTS: The overall rate of cesarean delivery was similar in white and nonwhite patients (15.8% and 16.1%, respectively), but rates varied (P < 0.001) according to insurance (17.0%, 14.2%, 10.7% in patients with commercial insurance, government insurance, and without insurance, respectively). However, after adjusting for clinical factors, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of cesarean delivery was higher in nonwhite patients (OR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.14-1.57; P < 0.001), but similar for patients with government insurance (OR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.90-1.14; P = 0.84) and lower for uninsured patients (OR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.41, 1.03; P = 0.067), albeit not statistically significant. In analyses stratified according to quintiles of predicted risk of cesarean delivery, racial differences were largely limited to patients in the lower risk quintiles. However, differences in odds ratios for uninsured patients were seen across the risk quintiles, although odds ratios were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: After adjusting for clinical factors, race and insurance status may independently influence the use of cesarean delivery. The higher rates in nonwhites and lower rates in the uninsured may reflect differences in patient preferences or expectations, differences in physician practice, or unmeasured risk factors. The lower odds of cesarean delivery in uninsured women, particularly women at high risk, may raise the issue of underutilization of services and warrants further study.

Adolescent↗

The effect of insurance coverage changes on drug utilization in HIV disease.

BACKGROUND: Insurance coverage facilitates access to life-saving medications for many patients with HIV disease. Thus, the effects of insurance coverage changes, such as the gain or loss of coverage, may be important in explaining patient access and adherence to the medications used in the treatment of HIV disease. OBJECTIVES: The study's objective was to examine whether changes in health insurance coverage affect rates of prescription drug use by patients with HIV disease. METHODS: Data were ascertained from adults participating in a series of up to six interviews as part of the AIDS Costs and Services Utilization Survey (ACSUS). ACSUS was an 18-month panel survey of patients in care for HIV/AIDS at 26 sites located in 10 U.S. cities. Poisson regression analyses with generalized estimating equations were conducted to determine the effects of demographic and socioeconomic variables on the acquisition rate of antiretrovirals, antipneumocystics, and antidepressants. The analytic sample consisted of 1566 respondents who provided 6518 interviews. RESULTS: Although changes in insurance coverage were common, complete loss of insurance was reported in only 1.5% of the interviews whereas gaining insurance was reported in 3.3% of interviews. Having no coverage was associated with significantly lower rates of antiretroviral (rate ratio [RR], 0.73), antipneumocystic (RR, 0.58) and antidepressant use (RR, 0.31). Gaining insurance coverage was associated with lower antiretroviral (RR, 0.75) and antipneumocystic (RR, 0.70) use whereas losing insurance was associated with lower antiretroviral use (RR, 0.58). In multivariate analyses, these associations remained. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in health insurance coverage are associated with lower rates of drug use for some medications used by patients with HIV disease.

Adult↗

The State Children's Health Insurance Program.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The State Children's Health Insurance Program expanded public health insurance to children who are ineligible for Medicaid yet unable to afford private health insurance. The program was a natural experiment, offering the opportunity to study the effects of expanding health insurance to a large population of children who would otherwise be uninsured. The State Children's Health Insurance Program is reviewed in the context of program goals, evaluation dimensions, past and current findings, and future directions. The studies and findings fall into five dimensions: (1) outreach/enrollment/uptake and profile of enrollees, (2) impact on insurance coverage and uninsured rates, (3) coverage dynamics, (4) impact on outcomes, and (5) costs. RECENT FINDINGS: Older studies focused on outreach, enrollment, characteristics of enrollees, disenrollment, and coverage dynamics. Current studies report the impact of the program on outcomes--including access to care, quality, satisfaction, unmet need, and health outcomes--for the overall population of children and for vulnerable subgroups, including racial and ethnic minorities and children with chronic illness. A smaller number of studies address costs. SUMMARY: The State Children's Health Insurance Program is evolving with demonstrated successes and areas for improvement. This information can enhance practicing pediatricians' understanding of barriers that face low-income children and families in seeking care for their children, can offer insight into what health insurance can and cannot do in terms of ameliorating those barriers, can provide insight into the prior experiences and current medical needs that a new enrollee in the program might have at the first visit to a practitioner, and can illuminate the challenges that low-income children and families may face in obtaining and maintaining health insurance coverage.

Child↗

Racial and ethnic disparities in the purchase of nongroup health insurance: the roles of community and family-level factors.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of community- and family-level factors on racial/ethnic disparities in the uptake of nongroup (individual) health insurance. DATA SOURCES: Responses to the 1996-1997 Community Tracking Study Household Survey plus community-level descriptors from several sources including census data, the Area Resource File, and community and migrant health center Medicare cost reports. STUDY DESIGN: Logistic regression was used to compare families in which at least one person had nongroup health insurance to families without nongroup insurance in which at least one person was uninsured. Sequential models were constructed examining family- and community-level factors. RESULTS: Twenty-three percent of families with otherwise-uninsured persons purchased nongroup insurance, ranging from 11% to 41% among the 60 communities sampled. Disadvantaged minority group members, especially Spanish-speaking Hispanics, had half or less the odds of whites of purchasing nongroup insurance. Education had a weaker association with purchasing nongroup insurance among minority group members than among whites. Community-level factors had minimal effect on disparities in uptake, although greater housing segregation was associated with lower uptake among blacks. CONCLUSIONS: Minority group members are much less likely to purchase nongroup insurance than whites. Family income and community factors do not explain this gap. Programs aimed at stimulating voluntary insurance purchase will continue to underenroll disadvantaged minorities if nonfinancial barriers to acquiring insurance coverage, including the interplay between race/ethnicity and education, are not better understood and addressed.

Black or African American↗

The association between health insurance coverage and diabetes care; data from the 2000 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the association between type of health insurance coverage and the quality of care provided to individuals with diabetes in the United States. DATA SOURCE: The 2000 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. STUDY DESIGN: Our study cohort included individuals who reported a diagnosis of diabetes (n=11,647). We performed bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses by age greater or less than 65 years to examine the association of health insurance coverage with diabetes-specific quality of care measures, controlling for the effects of race/ethnicity, annual income, gender, education, and insulin use. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Most individuals with diabetes are covered by private insurance (39 percent) or Medicare (44 percent). Among persons under the age of 65 years, 11 percent were uninsured. The uninsured were more likely to be African American or Hispanic and report low incomes. The uninsured were less likely to report annual dilated eye exams, foot examinations, or hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) tests and less likely to perform daily blood glucose monitoring than those with private health insurance. We found few differences in quality indicators between Medicare, Medicaid, or the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) as compared with private insurance coverage. Persons who received care through the VA were more likely to report taking a diabetes education class and HbA1c testing than those covered by private insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Uninsured adults with diabetes are predominantly minority and low income and receive fewer preventive services than individuals with health insurance. Among the insured, different types of health insurance coverage appear to provide similar levels of care, except for higher rates of diabetes education and HbA1c testing at the VA.

Adult↗

Health insurance and health at age 65: implications for medical care spending on new Medicare beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the consequences of endogeneity bias on the estimated effect of having health insurance on health at age 63 or 64, just before most people qualify for Medicare, and to simulate the implications for total and public insurance (Medicare and Medicaid) spending on newly enrolled beneficiaries in their first years of Medicare coverage. DATA: The longitudinal Health and Retirement Survey of people who were 55-61 years old in 1992, followed through biannual surveys to age 63-64 or until 2000 (whichever came first), and those who were 66-70 years olds from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Surveys, 1992-1998. STUDY DESIGN: Instrumental variable (IV) estimation of a simultaneous equation model of insurance choice and health at age 63-64 as a function of baseline health and sociodemographic characteristics in 1992 and endogenous insurance coverage over the observation period. FINDINGS: Continuous insurance coverage is associated with significantly fewer deaths prior to age 65 and, among those who survive, a significant upward shift in the distribution of health states from fair and poor health with disabilities to good to excellent health. Treating insurance coverage as endogenous increases the magnitude of the estimated effect of having insurance on improved health prior to age 65. The medical spending simulations suggest that if the near-elderly had continuous insurance coverage, average annual medical spending per capita for new Medicare beneficiaries in their first few years of coverage would be slightly lower because of the improvement in health status. In addition, total Medicare and Medicaid spending for new beneficiaries over their first few years of coverage would be about the same or slightly lower, even though more people survive to age 65. CONCLUSIONS: Extending insurance coverage to all Americans between the ages of 55 and 64 would improve health (increase survival and shift people from good-fair-poor health to excellent-very good health) at age 65, and possibly reduce total short-term spending by Medicare and Medicaid for newly eligible Medicare beneficiaries, even though more people would enter the program because of increased survival.

Aged↗

Simulation of a health insurance market with adverse selection.

A health insurance market is examined in which individuals with a history of high utilization of health care services tend to select fee-for-service (FFS) insurance when offered a choice between FFS and health maintenance organizations (HMOs). In addition, HMOs are assumed to practice community rating of employee groups. Based on these observations and health plan enrollment and premium data from Minneapolis-St. Paul, a deterministic simulation model is constructed to predict equilibrium market shares and premiums for HMO and FFS insurers within a firm. Despite the fact that favorable selection enhances their ability to compete with FFS insurers, the model predicts that HMOs maximize profits at less than 100% market share, and at a lower share than they could conceivably capture. That is, HMOs would not find it to their advantage to drive FFS insurers from the market even if they could. In all cases, however, the profit-maximizing HMO premium is greater than the experience-rated premium and, thus, the average health insurance premium per employee in firms offering both HMOs and FFS insurance is predicted to be greater than in firms offering one experience-rated plan. The model may be used to simulate the effects of varying the employer's method of contributing to health insurance premiums. Several contribution methods are compared. Employers who offer FFS and HMO insurance and pay the full cost of the lowest-cost plan are predicted to have lower average total premiums (employer plus employee contributions) than employers who pay any level percent of the cost of each plan.

Actuarial Analysis↗

Unworried parents of well children: a look at uninsured children who reportedly do not need health insurance.

OBJECTIVES: We examined the characteristics of uninsured children from low-income households whose parents reported that health insurance coverage was not needed. METHODS: With data from the 2001 National Survey of Children With Special Health Care Needs, we used logistic-regression analyses to investigate the odds of reporting that uninsured children do not need insurance for various sociodemographic groups and children of varying health status. We also explored the odds of health care use, awareness of Medicaid and the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), and desire to enroll according to the reported need for insurance. RESULTS: Parents of 6.8% of uninsured children from low-income households reported that their children did not need insurance. Rates were highest for American Indian/Alaska Native children (15.2%) and children whose parents completed the interview in a non-English language (10.6%). Rates were lowest for children with special health care needs (2.8%) and children with > or =7 school absences attributable to illness or injury in the past year (2.6%). Relative to children with another reason for lacking insurance, children who reportedly did not need insurance were less likely to have needed (adjusted odds ratio: 0.49) or used (adjusted odds ratio: 0.45) health care services in the past year and their parents were less likely to have heard of Medicaid or SCHIP (adjusted odds ratio: 0.58) or to have a desire to enroll their children if their children were eligible for Medicaid or SCHIP (adjusted odds ratio: 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing participation among uninsured children whose parents do not perceive a need for insurance coverage may require more than simply increasing knowledge about the availability of public insurance programs.

Adolescent↗

Health insurance and subjective health status: data from the 1987 National Medical Expenditure survey.

OBJECTIVES: The relationship between health insurance and subjective health status was investigated. It was hypothesized that persons without health insurance would have lower levels of subjective health status than those with health insurance and that this relationship would hold for both poor and nonpoor persons. METHODS: Data from the 1987 National Medical Expenditure Survey were analyzed to examine the relationship between health insurance and self-reported health status. The analysis controlled for sociodemographic and attitudinal variables and medical conditions. RESULTS: Persons without health insurance had significantly lower levels of subjective health status than did persons with insurance. This adverse effect persisted after adjustments were made for the effects of age, sex, race, income, attitude toward the value of medical care and health insurance, and medical conditions. The detrimental effect of lacking health insurance on subjective health status was present for persons at all income levels and was greater than the effect on subjective health status found for 2 of the 11 reported medical conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Lacking health insurance is associated with clinically significant lower levels of subjective health status in both poor and non-poor persons.

Adult↗

Health insurance coverage among persons with AIDS: results from a multistate surveillance project.

To determine factors associated with health insurance coverage among persons with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), we interviewed 1958 persons 18 years of age or older who were reported to have AIDS in 11 states and cities. Overall, 25% had no insurance, 55% had public insurance, and 20% had private insurance. Factors associated with lack of insurance varied by current employment status. Employed persons with an annual household income of less than $10,000 were 3.6 times more likely to lack insurance than employed persons with a higher income. Unemployed persons diagnosed with AIDS for less than 1 year were two times more likely to lack health insurance than unemployed persons diagnosed for a longer time. Making insurance available to persons identified as most likely to lack insurance should improve access to care for persons with AIDS.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

Portability of health insurance: COBRA expansions and small group market reform.

Proposals are currently being put forth to change the health care system incrementally. One area of proposed legislation addresses portability, which allows an individual to change insurers without being subjected to a new waiting period for preexisting conditions. These proposals, discussed in this Issue Brief, contain provisions to limit preexisting condition exclusions, guarantee access to health insurance, guarantee renewal of health insurance, allow individuals to contribute to medical savings accounts on a pretax basis, and change the current law under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA). The proposals would affect insurers, employers, and insured individuals by potentially increasing the cost of providing and purchasing health insurance. Concern about the portability of health insurance primarily arises in situations where an individual is leaving, or would like to leave, a job. If health insurance is not offered by a prospective employer, if the worker must satisfy a waiting period before becoming eligible for coverage, if the benefits package offered through the prospective employer is less generous, or if the employee (or a dependent) has a medical condition that is considered a preexisting condition and would not be covered by the new plan, the employee may opt to remain with his or her current employer--a situation known as job lock. Expansions of COBRA may not have any effect on portability. Employers can charge up to 102 percent of the premium for COBRA coverage, making it unaffordable for many workers. Because cost is a major factor, if there is no reduction in cost (or health care cost inflation) there could be little or no increase in coverage. According to one survey, in 1994 average COBRA costs were $5,301 per COBRA covered worker, compared with $3,420 for active employees. Any expansion of COBRA would almost certainly increase employer cost for health insurance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Budgets↗

Theory of health insurance.

The conventional explanation for purchasing insurance is to transfer risk. Psychologists, however, have shown that this explanation does not match actual behavior. They find that people generally prefer the risk of no loss at all to the certainty of a smaller actuarially equivalent loss, a situation exactly opposite to the one represented by the purchase of insurance. Nevertheless, people do purchase insurance, so there must be an explanation other than risk transfer for purchasing it. Of the explanations so far advanced, however, none have yet developed a wide acceptance. Regardless of risk issues, people will be more likely to purchase insurance when the premium is low compared to the value of the coverage to the consumer. Moral hazard raises the premium, as does adverse selection. The presence of either makes the purchase of insurance less likely. With health insurance, the tax subsidy can reduce the effective premium to less than the actuarially fair cost of insurance. This would increase the likelihood that health insurance is purchased. Finally, because of the value we place on our health, we desire access to a full range of health care. Health insurance is often the only affordable way of gaining access to this care, given the high costs of many of these procedures.

Actuarial Analysis↗

Health insurance system in the Republic of Macedonia.

The current health insurance system of the Republic of Macedonia was introduced by the Health Protection Law, which was adopted in 1991 and modified and supplemented by the amendments in 1993 and 1995. According to this Law, health insurance was established as an obligatory, supplementary obligatory, and voluntary insurance for certain kinds of health care. This report gives an insight into the specificities and practice of all three types of insurance in the Republic of Macedonia. A person can become an insured to the Health Insurance Fund on the basis of 23 modalities. More than 80% of the citizens are eligible to the obligatory health insurance, which provides a broad scope of basic health care rights. Payroll contributions are equal to 8.6% of gross earned wages and more than 70% of health sector revenues are derived from them. Besides some other basic resources and contributions for health financing, co-payments for health care expenses by users were introduced in 1993. Health financing and reform of the health insurance system are of high importance within the ongoing health care reform in the Republic of Macedonia. It is expected that the new Law on health insurance will strengthen the mechanisms for collecting revenues and introduce new methods of co-payment and risk-adjusted reallocation of the funds related to age structure and health status of the population.

Cost Sharing↗

Impact of insurance coverage type on laboratory test ordering behaviour of general practitioners.

BACKGROUND: There exists much variation between GP's in the use of laboratory tests. Although the requesting pattern of GPs has been extensively described in the literature, little is still known of the factors which influence the GP's test ordering behaviour. AIM: This study aimed to determine whether the payment scheme according to which general practitioners are reimbursed influences the laboratory test ordering behaviour. METHOD: The laboratory test ordering behaviour of the general practitioners of Tilburg, a town with 180,000 citizens in the south of The Netherlands, was studied during a four month period, in relation to the type of insurance coverage of the patients. Two types of insurance were considered: voluntary and compulsory. The data were collected from the laboratory administration and coupled with information obtained from two, interview rounds. RESULTS: Two findings support the hypothesis that the type of insurance coverage of the patient, has an impact on the test ordering behaviour of the physician: The ratio between laboratory requests for sickness fund patients and patients with a private health insurance was found to depend on the fraction of persons with a private health insurance within the family practice. This was tested with multiple linear regression analysis. General practices were divided into two subgroups, those with many > 29%) and few (< 29%), voluntarily insured patients. Where a patient was privately insured it was found that relatively more tests were ordered. In case of general practices with many voluntarily insured patients this distinction disappears. The relative proportion of voluntarily insured patients was found to be an important variable in explaining the test ordering behaviour of general practice physicians in Tilburg.

Aged↗

Health insurance coverage and physician use among children with disabilities: findings from probability samples in five metropolitan areas.

The effect of insurance coverage on physician use for children in the United States who have been identified as disabled by their schools under the provisions of the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (PL 94-142) is examined. The research is based on identically drawn stratified random samples of children from the elementary school special education populations of five large metropolitan school systems. It was found that health insurance coverage was a predictor of whether a disabled child had seen a doctor in the past year even after adjustment for site, family background characteristics, type and severity of childhood disability, and structural access factors (adjusted odds ratio, 1.76, P less than .05); Hispanic children with disabilities were more likely than white children to be without any health insurance (adjusted odds ratio, 3.63; P less than .001), but there was no similar statistically significant difference between blacks and whites; and wide variations persist in scope of insurance payment for care, such that parents of publicly insured children paid out of pocket for only 5% of all physician visits as compared to 30% of visits for the privately insured. Even for children with various low-prevalence disabilities, when privately insured, parents paid out of pocket for 23% of all physician visits. These data help clarify the extent of health insurance coverage among children with disabilities and indicate that insurance remains an important predictor of physician use even though it continues to pay for only certain elements of care.

Child↗

Prostate-specific antigen levels in African-Americans correlate with insurance status as an indicator of socioeconomic status.

PURPOSE: African-Americans have a higher age-adjusted incidence and a higher disease-specific mortality than whites. Two potential causes are differences in biology or socioeconomic status, the latter leading to differences in access, delivery, or utilization of health care. In this study, we compare serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels for comparable stage and grade-disease, as well as individual insurance status. PSA is a demonstrated indicator of the size and virulence of tumor and is correlated with prognosis. Insurance status has been linked with income and education and is an indicator of access to medical care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients were referred to the University of Chicago Center for Radiation Therapy (UCCRT) with stages A-C (T1-4) prostate cancer. They were seen in four different facilities, designated A through D, and were evaluated and staged by the faculty of UCCRT using the same criteria. Hospitals A and B are large teaching hospitals located within the city of Chicago; C and D are suburban and urban community hospitals, respectively. A total of 341 patients seen between May 1987 to November 1992 are included in this study. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, PSA levels were significantly associated with stage, grade, and race. Higher mean PSA levels were seen with increasing clinical stage and grade. African-Americans had higher mean values than whites. Private insurance and managed care patients had lower values than Medicare-only patients. Within each race, the above results were reproduced, except for insurance status, which was significant only in African-Americans. In multivariate analysis, stage, grade, and insurance status were significant in African-Americans, whereas only stage and grade were significant in whites. Within comparable insurance status, stage, and grade, no racial differences were found, except among Medicare-only patients, with African-Americans who had stage B or grade 2 disease having higher mean PSA levels than whites. Racial differences were seen at hospital B, but not at hospital A. No racial comparisons could be made at hospitals C or D due to an insufficient number of African-American patients. At hospital A, whites and African-Americans had comparable private plus HMO insurance distributions (81.1% and 86.9%, respectively); at hospital B, the distribution was quite different--only 4.4% of whites had Medicare-only insurance while 31.8% African-Americans had no supplementary insurance. For all patients in the multivariate analysis, racial difference was seen only among Medicare-only patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that socioeconomic differences are responsible for the racial differences noted in prostate cancer. Our findings of higher PSA levels in African-American Medicare-only patients may result from the many African-Americans disproportionately uninsured throughout their lives compared with whites and thus using services at later stages of disease. A second possible explanation is cultural or ethnic differences in care-seeking behavior, with poorer African-Americans less likely to pursue care for disease until it has progressed. Our findings can explain the dichotomy of poorer overall outcome among African-Americans with prostate cancer, but comparable stage-adjusted outcome with comparable treatments between African-Americans and whites.

Aged↗

The role of government in health insurance markets with adverse selection.

This paper analyzes the welfare economics of three arrangements for purchasing health insurance: competitive markets in which consumers are free to choose among options with different levels of coverage and prices; systems with compulsory partial pooling which permit private firms to sell supplementary coverage; and government-run pools that purchase comprehensive coverage at a single price for all consumers. Competitive insurance markets are assumed to face the problem of 'adverse selection'. This refers to a situation in which the insurer cannot observe characteristics of individuals that affect the cost of insurance and that are known to the individuals. Competitive markets with adverse selection are not efficient because low risks cannot purchase comprehensive insurance coverage. However, government-run pools with comprehensive coverage are an inefficient solution to the problem of adverse selection. Compulsory partial coverage may represent an attractive alternative to both competitive markets and comprehensive pools. We discover two situations when government intervention of this type will succeed: when there are not many high risks in the population, and when the risk types are similar. We discuss the implications of these results for health insurance programs in several countries. Our results also have implications for the allocation of public funds for disease-prevention projects. A project targeted at high risks will produce external benefits for low risks, even though they are not directly affected by the program. However, a successful project might eliminate the market for private insurance; in this case the government should consider mandating partial insurance coverage.

Canada↗

Health insurance access to young adult survivors of childhood cancer in North Carolina.

Historically, there has been evidence to support the hypothesis that survivors of childhood cancer have been discriminated against in the private health insurance market in some areas of the United States. Results of previous studies have been inconsistent and have generally focused on a limited number of outcome variables. A retrospective cohort study of young adult survivors of childhood cancer and their siblings was performed to determine the risk of health insurance access problems of childhood cancer survivors in North Carolina. Mailed questionnaires were completed by 182 cancer survivors from three institutions who were diagnosed between 1976 and 1988, and by 101 of their siblings for a response of 62.1%. Using logistic regression in SAS, cancer survivors were found to be more likely to be denied health insurance than their siblings, with an adjusted odds ratio of 15.1. Childhood cancer survivors also had health insurance policies that excluded care for pre-existing medical conditions more often than their siblings (OR = 5.5). In addition, cancer survivors reported problems obtaining health insurance coverage more frequently than their siblings with an adjusted odds ratio of 22.8. In general, survivors of childhood cancer who were diagnosed in North Carolina have had decreased access to health insurance coverage when compared to their siblings of similar age. North Carolina health insurance regulations permit health insurance firms to discriminate against cancer survivors because of their history of illness, often decreasing their access to needed follow-up care.

Adult↗