SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Ganglionic Blockers”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 685 records · Page 38Linked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

Assessment of QT interval and QT dispersion following stellate ganglion block using computerized measurements.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Prolongation of QT interval and QT dispersion (QTD) may be associated with an increased risk of arrhythmias. This study was designed to investigate the effects of right or left stellate ganglion block (SGB) on RR interval, QT interval, the rate-corrected QT (QTc) interval, QTD and the rate-corrected QTD (QTcD) using computerized measurements. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers underwent both right and left SGBs using 7 mL 1% mepivacaine with a 7-day interval between the 2 blocks. The measurement from the 12-lead electrocardiogram was performed for 60 minutes after SGB. RESULTS: Right SGB induced a significant decrease of RR interval immediately after the block, and significant increases of QT interval, QTc interval, QTD, and QTcD from immediately through 50 minutes after the block (P <.01). Left SGB induced a significant decrease of RR interval, and significant increases of QTc interval and QTD immediately after the block (P <.01). Left SGB also produced a significant decrease of QT interval from 20 through 50 minutes after the block, and a significant decrease of QTc interval from 30 through 50 minutes after the block (P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: Right SGB induces increases of the QT interval, QTc interval, QTD, and QTcD, and left SGB induces decreases of the QT interval and QTc interval.

Adult↗

PubMed1963

Indications for treatment and present-day drug therapy in essential hypertension.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Diet, Sodium-Restricted↗

PubMed1998

Analysis of peak magnitude and duration of analgesia produced by local anesthetics injected into sympathetic ganglia of complex regional pain syndrome patients.

OBJECTIVE: Pain-relieving effects of lidocaine/bupivicaine local anesthetic (LA) and saline (S) block of sympathetic ganglia (stellate block, 4 patients; lumbar sympathetic block, 3 patients) were compared in 7 complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) patients on a double-blind crossover basis to evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutic value of local anesthetic sympathetic blocks. DESIGN: Patients rated their pain on a visual analog scale before and after blocks and were tested for mechanical allodynia one-half hour after blocks. Thereafter, they rated their pain intensity in diaries four times a day for 7 days. Each patient received two blocks, S and LA, and served as his own control. RESULTS: Both S and LA injections of sympathetic ganglia produced large reductions in pain intensity in 6 of 7 patients 30 minutes after block. These large reductions were accompanied by the reversal of mechanical allodynia in both S and LA. The mean difference between initial peak reduction in pain intensity produced by saline (68.7%) and active local anesthetic (74.4%) did not approach statistical significance. In striking contrast, the mean duration of pain relief was reliably longer in the case of LA (3 days, 18 hours) as compared with S ( 19.9 hours), a difference that occurred in all 7 patients. In a larger sample of 41 CRPS patients, signs of sympathetic efferent blockade, including Homer' s syndrome or skin surface temperature change, were not predictive of initial peak magnitude of pain relief from sympathetic blockade but were predictive of duration of pain reduction. CONCLUSION: The combination of these results provides evidence that duration of pain relief is affected by injection of local anesthetics into sympathetic ganglia. These results indicate that both magnitude and duration of pain reduction should be closely monitored to provide optimal efficacy in procedures that use local anesthetics to treat CRPS.

Adult↗

PubMed1962