Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Capitalism”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 685 records · Page 38Linked to original sources

Alternative method of funding hospital capital expenditures.

This article presents a model that demonstrates how a hospital can form a strategic partnership with a vendor to use the vendor's previous knowledge, experience, and strategic alliances to fund capital expenditures and implement cost savings programs for the hospital, with no capital outlay or risk to the hospital. The vendor assumes full financial risk for the success of the program. In exchange for the vendor's full risk, the hospital shares in the savings with the vendor.

Capital Expenditures↗

Assessing healthcare market trends and capital needs: 1996-2000.

An analysis of recent data suggests several significant trends for the next five years, including a continuation of market-based reform, increases in managed care penetration, growth of Medicare and Medicaid health maintenance organizations, and erosion of hospital profits. A common response to these trends is to create integrated delivery systems, which can require significant capital investment. The wisest capital investment strategy may be to avoid asset-based integration in favor of "virtual integration," which emphasizes coordination through patient-management agreements, provider incentives, and information systems, rather than investment in large number of facilities.

Capital Expenditures↗

Capital management balances charitable, financial goals.

Effective capital management allows not-for-profit healthcare organizations to make investment decisions that fulfill their missions and meet financial goals. The process involves identifying components of the hospital's value and creating policies aimed at maximizing it; determining the hospital's ability to produce financial capital; and developing a process for allocating this financial capability among the components of value. Once this is completed, hospitals should determine criteria that balance charitable and financial goals, enabling them to pursue sound investments.

Capital Expenditures↗

Managing the transition to capitation.

Although most experts believe that capitation and financial risk-sharing among providers will become key components of the U.S. healthcare system, providers may not feel the full effect of this shift for several years. In the interim, providers must operate under an activity-based payment system that rewards them for the volume of patients seen, while preparing for the transition to a fixed, per-capita payment system that will reward them for the efficiency with which services are provided. Preparation for the move to capitation will involve implementation of the systems necessary to negotiate managed care contracts, enhance quality and efficiency, and take responsibility for the health of a defined population.

Capital Expenditures↗

Establishing reserves for capitation contracts.

Capitation introduces a number of significant considerations to financial reporting that normally are associated with insurance. These considerations arise for two reasons: (1) because providers receive revenue before services are rendered and (2) because providers assume the risk that the expenses they incur in delivering contracted services may exceed revenue. Both factors should be accounted for on financial statements by creating reserves representing actual and potential liabilities associated with capitation contracts as of the statement date. Continuous review of these reserves is necessary to ensure they remain adequate and are allocated appropriately.

Accounting↗

Are HMOs ready for new risk-based capital rules?

Are HMOs ready for risk-based capital requirements? A startling 22% of those responding to the NAIC's test run of the formula reported insufficient capital to avoid triggering corrective action.

Actuarial Analysis↗

Capital allocation. Three cases of financing the future.

In hospitals and health systems, numerous worthwhile capital projects are competing for limited capital. Hospitals face demands for technology upgrades, facility renovations, and new services. Some projects cannot be delayed, even though they do not bring a direct financial return. Certain services are not themselves profitable but serve as patient gateways to more profitable services.

Capital Expenditures↗

Capital access.

To maintain their viability, hospitals are being compelled to invest in big capital projects such as information technology and renovation and construction. This gatefold examines the trends in credit and capital, and how they affect hospitals' access to money.

Capital Expenditures↗

Capital budgeting and cost reimbursement in investor-owned and not-for-profit hospitals.

Net present value estimates cannot be made in health care finance without the appropriate cost reimbursement adjustments. The results of new regulations could radically alter the effects of reimbursement on capital budgeting. Debates on the effects of cost reimbursement on decision making in hospitals will continue as long as reimbursement exists in a manner that affects operating cash flows or the cost of capital.

Budgets↗

Capital decisions. Where is the smart money being invested?

Health care executives are faced with a welter of priorities when it comes to allocating their increasingly scarce capital: they need to build information systems, organize primary care physicians, and expand outpatient services. But what are the defining issues? We asked five executives to explain how their strategies are changing as a result of managed care growth and integration. What emerges is a snapshot of the new capital allocation reality.

Capital Expenditures↗

Pediatric carve outs. The use of disease-specific conditions as risk adjusters in capitated payment systems.

OBJECTIVE: To address the issue of adverse selection in capitated payment systems by developing a list of disease-specific pediatric conditions (i.e., "carve outs") to be considered for separate reimbursement. DESIGN: A descriptive study using a large Medicaid database. INTERVENTION: With the use of fiscal year 1993 Washington State Medicaid cost data for 302,240 pediatric patients, a list of disease-specific carve outs was developed to meet the following criteria: high cost, low variability in cost, and association with a large proportion of medical spending. RESULTS: Six-hundred seventy-three patients (0.2%) in the database had annual costs totaling $25,000 or more. Ten percent of the cases accounted for approximately two thirds of spending, while the least expensive 70% of cases made up only 15% of the expenditures. Prematurity and complications of prematurity, neoplasms, congenital heart disease, organ transplantations, congenital anomalies, and respiratory problems were general categories of disease that met our criteria for a carve out. The association of a major surgical procedure with a diagnosis increased the predictive accuracy for high cost. CONCLUSION: Lists of disease-specific carve outs such as this one can be used by Medicaid plans and other insurers who are concerned about risk selection to identify conditions for separate reimbursement in capitated payment systems.

Adolescent↗

Home investment in husband's human capital and the wife's decision to work.

"This paper explores the importance of husbands' career demands and assortative mating patterns for market-specific human capital on the decision of married women to work or not....[It] has three goals: (1) to derive, within the framework of a standard model of home production, a testable hypothesis concerning the effect of home investment in husband's human capital on a wife's decision to work; (2) to reconcile the theory with the existing empirical evidence by noting that issues of joint husband and wife decision-making cannot be viewed without considering the role of the marriage sorting market; and (3) to provide new empirical evidence that isolates the home investment effect from the sorting effect." Data are from 281 married couples in the United States.

Americas↗

Capital accumulation, inertia of consumption and norms of reproduction.

"A model of capital accumulation is built in relation with fertility and consumption. Avoiding [the imposition of] a direct analytical relationship between these three variables, the author studies the set of possible evolutions under the constraints imposed by the inertia of habit change. The conflict between the necessity to avoid impoverishment, the desire to increase consumption when possible and the reproduction intensity delineate the set of viable solutions and the set of attitudes leading to capital extinction. This qualitative view of change of behaviors provides an alternative explanation to historical fertility fluctuations outside the usual Easterlin framework." The geographical focus is on Western developed countries, with particular reference to Sweden.

Behavior↗

On marriage-specific human capital: its role as a determinant of remarriage.

"This paper focuses on the determinants of the likelihood and timing of remarriage for women: which characteristics of women and their first unions are conducive to quick remarriage and which are associated with low remarriage probabilities?... By analyzing the role of transferable marriage-specific capital as an asset, the present paper suggests a reinterpretation of past results and shows that such human capital constitutes an important component of women's gains from remarriage....[It] studies the determinants of remarriage separately for white and black women. The effects of the duration of first union and the presence of children from that union on remarriage probabilities are found to differ by race, results which can be interpreted within the context of the model developed here." Data from the 1982 U.S. National Survey of Family Growth are used to test the model.

Black or African American↗

Physician participation in capital punishment: a question of professional integrity.

The death penalty is legal in 36 states, and physicians are expected to attend and participate in executions. Yet, every major medical and health-related organization opposes physician participation in capital punishment. This article argues that it is unethical for physicians within the role as medical professional to participate in capital punishment, and that such acts erode the foundation of trust at the heart of medical practice. We believe that it is important for professional groups and medical societies to impose sanctions on members who choose to participate in executions.

Capital Punishment↗

Predictions of future dangerousness in capital murder trials: is it time to "disinvent the wheel"?

Although recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions regarding the death penalty (e.g., Atkins v. Virginia, 2002) have renewed interest in mental health issues, one topic that has not received much attention recently is the ongoing use of expert testimony to support claims that defendants represent a "continuing threat to society." In this article, we (a) review prior research relevant to determining the accuracy of clinical predictions that capital defendants will commit future acts of criminal violence; (b) summarize new data from current and former death row inmates in Texas that bolster the claim that such predictions are gross overestimates of risk; and (c) review extant research addressing the potential utility of various risk assessment instruments that increasingly are being used to reinforce clinical predictions in capital trials. Despite significant recent advances in the field of risk assessment, clinical assertions that a defendant is likely to commit future violent acts appear to be highly inaccurate and ethically questionable at best. Moreover, available research offers little support for the claim that the accuracy of these predictions will be appreciably improved by relying on more structured risk assessment measures that have some demonstrated predictive validity in other contexts.

Adolescent↗

Cost/benefit analysis and capital investment decisions in nuclear cardiology.

This paper demonstrates an application of Cost-Benefit Analysis as an aid in capital investment medical decision making. Specifically, a cost-benefit analysis is used to compare three nuclear cardiology instruments (i.e. Nuclear Stethoscope, Mobile Camera/Computer and Fixed Cardiac Computer). The study examined both non-quantitative and quantitative comparative factors. Results of the study show: (1) Conversion of the non-quantitative factors into a numerical system (via medical opinion) greatly delineates the relative merits of each instrument. (2) Simulating the stochastic economic and equipment utilization factors reveals instrument selection to be a function of patient flow and amortization procedures. (3) Adjusting the quantitative assessment of each instrument by the non-quantitative assessment (via the numerical system) aids in the capital investment decision.

Capital Expenditures↗

Long-range hospital capital requirements planning: the state of the art, a proposal for change.

A Hospital Capital Requirements Planning System is proposed to channel competition through the use of a regional planning model. This model would help to reduce the social deadweight loss arising from competition-induced uncertainty. The system would increase the internal long-range planning capacity of hospitals and improve the quality of the applications presented for Certificate of Need review. Both health systems planners and investment bankers should have better information with which to evaluate hospital capital investment proposals.

Capital Expenditures↗