SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Incidental appendectomy at the time of surgery for ectopic pregnancy can be performed safely in the appropriately selected patient. The added procedure does not place the patient at increased operative risk and spares her from the possible subsequent development of acute appendicitis.
Two hundred seventeen patients were admitted to a randomized and prospective trial of the use of topical hydrogen peroxide prophylactically against wound infection after appendectomy through a gridiron incision. One hundred nine patients received topical hydrogen peroxide and 108 patients were in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference in the wound infection rates in the two groups. Risk factors found to be associated with a significantly higher wound infection rate were (1) age greater than 40 years, (2) duration of symptoms of over 36 hours, (3) generalized guarding, tenderness or rebound, (4) state of the appendix at operation, (5) serous or purulent peritoneal effusion, (6) subjective difficulty of operation as assessed by the surgeons, and (7) positive bacterial culture from the appendicular fossa.
The finding of a normal appendix on appendectomy should occur in no more than 15 percent of patients, and in half of these some other cause of the abdominal pain will probably be found, most often gynecologic in origin. In order to achieve this rate, surgeons will have to exercise more restraint, develop greater discrimination in evaluating abdominal findings and probably spend more time palpating abdomens. This must be done while maintaining the incidence of perforation at or below 15 percent. A needless operation to remove a normal appendix is not an innocuous procedure and cannot be rationalized as such, but against this must be weighed the risks of delayed surgery when the history, physical findings and laboratory data are unequivocal. Future statistical reviews will tell how well surgeons are applying their skills in the evaluation of the troublesome vermiform appendix, and if there are any differences in the Health Maintenance Organization setting compared with the fee-for-service hospital.
Laparotomy with a preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis disclosed a normal appendix in 105 children (22.1 percent). In less than half of these, another condition was found or later identified, which explained the symptoms leading to operation. Ovarian lesions, acute ileocolitis, and serositis were the most frequently identified abnormalities. Twelve patients (11 percent) underwent definitive procedures in addition to appendectomy. Among patients in whom no abnormality was identified at laparotomy, peritoneal cultures yielded a broad range of organisms in 42 percent of those who had cultures. This may represent a mild form of acute primary peritonitis and may explain the symptoms which were confused with acute appendicitis.
Abdominal muscular contractions may have a protective influence against the development of indirect inguinal hernia. A portion of the transversus abdominus muscles acts on the internal inguinal rings and produces a closure mechanism during voluntary abdominal muscular activity. It follows, therefore, that injury or inactivation of this mechanism may be an etiologic factor in the development of indirect inguinal hernia. One cause of injury to this mechanism is denervation and regional muscle paralysis occurring during a surgical procedure. Electromyographic findings support the hypothesis that paralysis of inferior fibers of the transversus abdominus muscle occurred after appendectomy, and may have been important in the development of an inguinal hernia.
Five cases of bilateral ureteral obstruction after appendicectomy are presented. All five patients were boys (age range, 9 to 15 years). All of them had had severe appendicitis. Based on the urethrocystoscopy findings, edema of the posterior bladder wall appeared to be the cause of obstruction of both distal ureters. This is confirmed by the immediate recovery of renal function after installation of bilateral uretercatheters. It is known that contamination of the peritoneal cavity can occur by organisms leaking from a gangrenous or perforated appendix. This can cause localized inflammatory edema of the posterior bladder wall. It is remarkable that through ultrasound investigation, only mild to moderate dilatation of the urinary tract was observed. An explanation can be obtained from animal models, wherein acute obstruction of the ureter leads only to a transient increase in ureteral pressure, followed by a decline toward the preobstruction level. It is important to be aware that this complication can occur after appendectomy; bilateral uretercatheters can be installed, and irreversible renal damage can be avoided.
BACKGROUND: Anecdotal evidence suggests that schizophrenia patients who require surgery have a high rate of adverse outcomes. We searched the Department of Veterans Affairs national datasets to determine the clinical course of schizophrenia patients with appendicitis who underwent appendectomy. METHODS: The Patient Treatment File (the nationwide inpatient database for the Department of Veterans Affairs) and the Beneficiary Identification and Records Location System were searched to identify all patients with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnostic codes for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder diagnosed with appendicitis during fiscal years 1995 to 1999. Computer-based information was supplemented with chart-based data. We sought data on six common preoperative risk factors and 25 specific adverse outcomes, including death. RESULTS: There were 55 patients identified. The mean age was 49, and 96% were men. The median time from symptom onset to diagnosis of appendicitis was 3 days. A history of substance abuse was obtained in 16 (29%). Disruptive behavior was documented in 16 (29%). Restraints were used in 9 (9%). The appendix was perforated in 36 (66%) and gangrenous in 9 (16%). Thirty-one (56%) had > or = 1 complication; there were 2 in-hospital deaths (4%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report on this topic in the medical literature. Appendicitis is typically diagnosed late in schizophrenic patients. Adverse patient behaviors are frequent. The complication and death rates are high.
Negative-pressure pulmonary edema after endotracheal intubation is an uncommon and potentially serious complication of patients undergoing general anesthesia for different surgical procedures. We report a case of a healthy 20-year-old male patient with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The patient was submitted to appendectomy under general anesthesia and developed negative-pressure pulmonary edema immediately after extubation. The present paper reports this potentially serious complication illustrating the main radiological findings consistent with alveolar hemorrhage in this setting and the treatment performed.
AIM OF THE STUDY: The benefits of laparoscopic appendectomy remain controversial. The aim of the study was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of this technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four hundred and forty-eight patients operated on for suspected appendicitis during a 5-year period were analysed in a retrospective study. The preoperative diagnosis was corrected in 21.4% of the cases (8.1% for males and 28.7% for females) and the conversion rate was 9.7%. There were 17 patients with generalized peritonitis and 28 with localized peritonitis. During the past year, this surgical method was introduced in another hospital and a prospective study included 92 consecutive patients operated on for appendicitis. The operating time was 53 minutes and the conversion rate was 7.6%. There were five patients with generalized peritonitis and eight with localized peritonitis. RESULTS: There were no postoperative deaths. In the first period, the morbidity rate was 2.3% in the laparoscopic group without conversion. After pathological examination, there was a 14.2% rate of normal appendix. The mean hospital stay was 4.3 days. In the second period, there were only three minor complications and the mean hospital stay was 4.19 days. CONCLUSION: The choice of laparoscopic approach is associated with some advantages: corrections of the diagnosis (mainly in young women) and simplification of the postoperative course, provided that the surgeon has sufficient experience.
Morphea is a sclerosing skin disease that may be clinically confused with a carcinoma when it involves the breast. It has been described in association with earlier radiotherapy and with silicone breast implants. We describe the case of a woman with morphea of the breast who developed necrobiosis lipoidica over the scar of an appendectomy performed 38 years earlier. Necrobiosis lipoidica over surgical scars is infrequently found in the literature. We review the published cases and discuss the association of necrobiosis lipoidica with morphea.
A retrospective review of 2,216 patients surgically treated for a clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis was performed. In 80% of cases, histologic acute appendicitis was found; 57% of these patients were male. The rate of normal appendectomy was 16%, and females comprised 68% of that group. The remaining 102 cases (4%) were designated as the alternate diagnosis group. Apart from histologic diagnoses that could be considered variants of normal (57) or acute inflammation (20), the alternate diagnosis group included such entities as neoplasm, parasitic infection, mucocele, and diverticulitis.
Sulbactam is a beta-lactamase inhibitor, which when administered with ampicillin, increases the latter agents antibacterial activity against beta-lactamase producing organisms. One hundred children between the ages of 5 and 14 undergoing emergency appendectomy were entered into a prospective randomized trial comparing sulbactam and ampicillin (SA) with metronidazole and cefotaxime (MC) as prophylaxis against postoperative wound infection. Patients in whom the appendix was perforated or gangrenous received a 72-hour course of antibiotics, others received a single dose only. The overall wound infection rate was 8% (14% in patients with perforation or gangrene and 4% in those without). There was no difference in infection rate between the two antibiotic groups; there were three wound infections and one subphrenic abscess in patients receiving SA and four wound infections in patients receiving MC. SA, therefore, appears to be a suitable antibiotic combination for use as prophylaxis in appendicitis in children.
A laparoscopic approach to patients with possible appendicitis has increased in popularity. In this article it is compared to the traditional open appendectomy, and the management of frequently found gynecologic pathology masquerading as appendicitis is described.
Employers' increased sensitivity to health care costs has forced insurers to seek ways to lower costs through effective bargaining with providers. What factors determine the prices negotiated between hospitals and insurers? The hospital-insurer interaction is captured in the context of a bargaining model, in which the gains from bargaining are explicitly defined. Appendectomy was chosen because it is a well-defined procedure with little clinical variation. Our results show that certain hospital institutional arrangements (e.g. hospital affiliations), HMO penetration, and greater hospital concentration improve hospitals' bargaining position. Furthermore, hospitals' bargaining effectiveness has diminished over time and varies across states.
This study was undertaken to describe the causes and consequences of delayed diagnosis and intervention in cases of appendicitis. The hospital records of adult patients undergoing appendectomy during a 4-year period (November 1989 to November 1993) were reviewed, with concentration on 40 patients who had a delay of 72 hours or more from initial symptoms to operation. The initial medical contact points for patients were walk-in clinics and community emergency departments. Definitive care was provided in a general hospital. Patients were adults with appendicitis who underwent an operation for definitive management 72 or more hours after the onset of symptoms. Length of hospital stay, reasons for delay in diagnosis, incidence of perforation, and complications were recorded. Delay in diagnosis and treatment was attributed to factors controlled by the patient in 15 cases (27.5%) and by the physician in 25 cases (62.5%). Perforation, postoperative complications, and hospital length of stay were related to the delay in diagnosis; with delay, the mean hospital length of stay was 9 days, the incidence of perforation was 90%, and major complications were recorded in 60% of the patients. Early diagnosis and surgical management for appendicitis remains an important and, at times, elusive goal. Delays of 72 hours or more have serious consequences. Patient education and the experience, intuitiveness, and persistence of the physician are important elements to improving these findings.
INTRODUCTION: The current practice of further exploration for other intra-abdominal pathology only when a normal appendix is found may leave other organic causes of acute abdomen undetected if the surgeon's on-table diagnostic accuracy is low. METHODS: In this retrospective study in 518 patients who underwent surgery for acute appendicitis, the on-table operative diagnosis of surgeons was correlated with the histological diagnosis of pathologists. RESULTS: Surgeons were unable to make an accurate on-table diagnosis in 14.3% of cases. The sensitivity for diagnosing normal appendices was also low at 51.3%, suggesting that almost half of normal appendices were misdiagnosed as acute appendicitis and there was no further exploration for other pathology. It was also found that surgeon's experience, patient gender and patient age had no significant effect on diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, it seems that the on-table diagnostic accuracy in open appendectomies is low and surgeons' on-table diagnosis should not be the determining factor for whether further exploration is necessary. Exploration for other intra-abdominal pathology should be routine irrespective of the on-table diagnosis, the surgeon's experience and patient gender and age. An alternative is minimal-access surgery in which inspection of other intra-abdominal organs can be performed more easily.
AIMS: Helicobacter pylori has been found in the upper gastrointestinal tract; it is incriminated as aetiological factor in various pathological conditions. This prospective study assesses the presence of this microorganism in the appendix flora and the possible role of its infection in the pathogenesis of acute appendicitis. METHODS: H. pylori was investigated in 46 consecutive patients undergoing emergent appendectomy for presumed acute appendicitis. Blood sample for serological test of H. pylori infection was drawn before operation. The removed appendix specimen was stained for H. pylori; confirmation was made by PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) analysis. The intensity of inflammation was determined pathologically grading from no inflammation to gangrenous appendicitis. Statistical analysis was made using the chi-square test. RESULTS: Seropositivity for H. pylori infection was found in 18 patients (39%), but the microbe was detected in just two appendix specimens (4%). In all seropositive patients acute appendicitis was confirmed by the pathology study; serous (33%) and purulent or gangrenous (67%). The latter incidence in the seronegative patients was 50%. There were found eight specimens (17%) negative for inflammation dealing all with seronegative patients. CONCLUSIONS: It seems that H. pylori colonizes the appendix in small proportion and is unlikely to be associated in direct correlation with acute appendicitis. However, seropositive patients with acute inflammation are likely to suffer from purulent or gangrenous form.
We report a boy who developed a vertebral stroke immediately after an appendectomy. Basilar impression was diagnosed eight years after this event when skull roentgenograms revealed basilar impression with high standing tip of the odontoid. We speculate that muscle relaxation and cervical hyperextension during intubation in the presence of basilar impression resulted in vertebral artery dissection and stroke. We suggest that patients with vertebral stroke and no obvious risk factors should be evaluated for the presence of malformations of the craniovertebral junction to be able to take precautions against excessive neck movement during intubation.