Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Resectable”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 667 records · Page 37Linked to original sources
PubMed2007

Radio(chemo)therapy plus resection versus radio(chemo)therapy alone for the treatment of stage III esophageal cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare radio(chemo)therapy with 41.4-50.4 Gy (moderate dose, MD-RCT) plus resection versus radio(chemo)therapy with 59.4-66.6 Gy (higher dose, HD-RCT) alone for outcome in stage III esophageal cancer, and to investigate potential prognostic factors including preradiotherapy (pre-RT) hemoglobin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 148 patients with stage III esophageal cancer, treated with MD-RCT plus resection (n = 41) or HD-RCT alone (n = 107), were retrospectively evaluated for age, gender, performance status, tumor location, tumor length, stage, histology, grading, number of chemotherapy courses, pre-RT hemoglobin, resection, overall survival (OS), metastases-free survival (MFS), and locoregional control (LC). RESULTS: On univariate analysis, MD-RCT plus resection resulted in better 2-year OS (57% vs. 25%; p = 0.049), 2-year MFS (71% vs. 39%; p = 0.041), and 2-year LC (76% vs. 39%; p = 0.003). On multivariate analysis, results maintained significance for LC (p = 0.021). According to multivariate analysis, pre-RT hemoglobin was associated with OS (p = 0.003), MFS (p = 0.043), and LC (p = 0.041), tumor length with OS (p = 0.002) and MFS (p = 0.017), and the number of chemotherapy courses with OS (p = 0.008). Complications were more frequent in the MD-RCT-plus-surgery group (p < 0.001). Acute (p = 0.47) and late toxicity (p = 0.86) were similar in both groups. In patients receiving surgery, R0 resection was superior to R1/2 resection for OS (p < 0.001), MFS (p = 0.030), and LC (p < 0.001). MD-RCT plus R0 resection was also superior to HD-RCT alone. CONCLUSION: MD-RCT plus resection resulted in better LC than HD-RCT alone. If R0 resection is possible, MD-RCT plus resection appears preferable, as it results in better outcome. If only R1/2 resection can be performed, HD-RCT alone appears preferable regarding outcome and the greater morbidity associated with resection.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2005

Intraoperative MRI to guide the resection of primary supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme--a quantitative radiological analysis.

Patients with supratentorial high-grade glioma underwent surgery within a vertically open 0.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) system to evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative MR guidance in achieving gross-total resection. For 31 patients, preoperative clinical data and MR findings were consistent with the putative diagnosis of a high-grade glioma, in 23 cases in eloquent regions. Tumor resections were carried out within a 0.5-T MR SIGNA SP/i (GE Medical Systems, USA). The resection of the lesion was carried out using fully MR compatible neurosurgical equipment and was stopped at the point when the operation was considered complete by the surgeon viewing the operation field with the microscope. We repeated imaging to determine the residual tumor volume only visible with MRI. Areas of tissue that were abnormal on these images were localized in the bed of resection by using interactive MR guidance. The procedure of resection, imaging control and interactive image guidance was repeated where necessary. Almost all tissue with abnormal characteristics was resected, with the exception of tissue localized in eloquent brain areas. The diagnosis of glioblastoma was confirmed in all 31 cases. When comparing the tumor volume before resection and at the point where the neurosurgeon would otherwise have terminated surgery ("first control"), residual tumor tissue was detectable in 29/31 patients; the mean residual tumor volume was 30.7 +/- 24%. After repeated resections under interactive image guidance the mean residual tumor volume was 15.1%. At this step we found tumor remnants only in 20/31 patients. The perioperative morbidity (12.9%) was low. Twenty-seven patients underwent sufficient postoperative radiotherapy. We found a significant difference (log(rank)p = 0.0037) in the mean survival times of the two groups with complete resection (n = 10, median survival time 537 days) and incomplete resection (n = 17, median survival time 237 days). The resection of primary glioblastoma multiforme under intraoperative MR guidance as demonstrated is a possibility to achieve a more complete removal of the tumor than with conventional techniques. In our small but homogeneous patient group we found an increase in the median survival time in patients with MRI for complete tumor resection, and the overall surgical morbidity was low.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Hepatic resection in the elderly.

From 1986 to 1995 a total of 97 patients > 65 years of age underwent hepatic resections at the Department of General Surgery, Hospital Lainz, Vienna, Austria. The population consisted of 39 men and 58 women with a mean age of 74.0 +/- 5.5 years. Primary neoplasia of the liver was the cause of resection in 35 patients, gallbladder cancer in 16 patients, and metastatic disease to the liver (due to colorectal cancer in 70%) in 40 patients. The rate of major resections (> or = 3 liver segments) was 96% for primary neoplasia of the liver, 70% for metastatic disease to the liver, and 50% for gallbladder cancer; the associated mortality rates were 23%, 2.5%, and 25%, respectively. The magnitude of the resection had a significant influence on survival for gallbladder cancer (p = 0.02) and for primary neoplasia of the liver (p = 0.002) but not for metastatic disease to the liver. This reflects the high rate of cirrhosis in hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinoma (88%) and gallbladder cancer (37.5%). Both pre- and postoperative severe liver dysfunction had a significantly higher risk for postoperative mortality and morbidity, which showed an incremental risk with age. Another organ system able to predict outcome at the beginning of treatment by its moderate severe dysfunction were the lungs. Overall, only right and extended right lobectomies carried a significantly higher risk for postoperative mortality and morbidity. Postoperative complications were recorded in 43% of our patients, with infection the most frequent problem in nearly all of these patients (95%). Pneumonia was the leading complication associated patient survival. All patients who developed pneumonia as a late complication during a complicated postoperative course died postoperatively. The postoperative Goris score of the patients who died was 6.9 +/- 2.9 (range 3-11), whereas the surviving patients' score averaged 2.2 +/- 1.9 (range 0-9), which was significantly different (p = 0.0003). None of the 54 patients with a GORIS score < or = 2 died postoperatively, whereas 5 of 6 patients with a score > or = 9 died (p = 0.0001). Severe liver dysfunction rather than the extent of resection influences clinical mortality. Patients > 80 years of age with a preoperative severe liver dysfunction showed a postoperative mortality of 57%, and all of these patients developed postoperative complications. Therefore resection cannot be recommended for those patients. Cirrhosis led to an unacceptable mortality of 44% after hepatic resection of > or = 5 liver segments for primary neoplasia of the liver. Major resections cannot be recommended in the aged with gallbladder cancer because 50% of the patients died after such operations. Overall, only resection of > or = 5 liver segments with segments I to III or less remaining were found to pose a major risk for clinical mortality and morbidity, but the cause of death was preexisting liver dysfunction and cirrhosis in all of these patients. Major resections of large neoplasia of the liver can be recommended even in the aged, but a preoperative preselection of patients with respect to liver function and pulmonary function preoperatively may help lower the postoperative morbidity and mortality, especially in patients who will undergo resection of > or = 5 liver segments. Major hepatic resection for metastatic disease to the liver in the elderly carries no additional survival risk. Patients > 65 years of age and especially those > 80 years of age are more liable to succumb to postoperative organ failure and complications, especially infections.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients.

BACKGROUND: Controversy continues to surround laparoscopic rectal resection for malignancy. A longer follow-up period is required to evaluate the long-term efficacy of the procedure and its impact on survival. Furthermore, no data from ongoing randomized controlled trials are yet available. The aims of this study were to compare long-term outcomes for unselected patients undergoing either laparoscopic or open rectal resection for cancer. METHODS: A series of 124 unselected consecutive patients with rectal cancer, who underwent surgery by the same surgical team, have been included in this study. Patients with T1N0 tumors underwent local excision, and emergency cases were excluded from the study. Written consent was submitted by each patient, and inclusion in either group (laparoscopic or open) was left to the patient's choice. The laparoscopic approach was chosen by 81 patients, and 43 patients chose open surgery. All the patients underwent preoperative radiotherapy (5,040 cGy), performed in selected cases with chemotherapy (for patients younger than 70 years). The following parameters were compared between the two groups: length of the surgical specimen, clearance of the margins of the specimen, number of lymph nodes identified, local recurrence rate, incidence of distant metastases, and survival probability analysis. The mean follow-up period for both groups was 43.8 months (range, l-9 years). RESULTS: We performed 60 laparoscopic and 27 open anterior resections, as well as 21 laparoscopic and 16 open abdomino perineal resections, respectively. No mortality occurred in either group. The mean length of the resected specimens was 24.3 cm in the laparoscopic group and 23.8 cm in the open group ( p = 0.47). The mean tumor-free margin was 3.0 cm in the laparoscopic group and 2.8 cm in the open group ( p = 0.57), and the mean number of lymph nodes identified was 10.3 in the laparoscopic group and 9.8 in the open group ( p = 0.63). Of the 124 patients, 86 (52 laparoscopic and 34 open) were included in out study. We excluded patients who underwent a palliative resection (6 laparoscopic and 6 open patients) or conversion to open surgery ( n = 10) and patients who had undergone surgery in the past year ( n = 16). One laparoscopic patient was lost to follow-up evaluation, whereas three laparoscopic patients and one open patient died of causes not related to cancer. No wound recurrence was observed. The local recurrence rate after laparoscopic resection was 20.8%, as compared with 16.6% after open resection ( p = 0.687). Distant metastases occurred in 18.2% of the patients in the laparoscopic group, as compared with 21.2% in the open group ( p = 0.528). Cumulative survival probability was 0.709 after laparoscopic resection after LR and 0.606 after open resection ( p = 0.162), whereas for Dukes' stages A, B, and C in the laparoscopic group versus the open group, it was 0.875 vs 0.889 ( p = 0.392), 0.722 vs 0.584 ( p = 0.199), and 0.500 vs 0.417 ( p = 0.320), respectively. At this writing 20 laparoscopic patients (62.5%) and 20 open patients (60.6%) are disease free ( p = 0.623). CONCLUSIONS: Oncologic surgical principles were respected. Long-term outcome after laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer was comparable with that after conventional resection. We should wait to draw conclusive scientific statements until the completion of ongoing international randomized controlled trials.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to examine the outcome of cancer of the lower rectum, particularly the rates of local recurrence and survival for tumors located in this area that have been treated by anterior or abdominoperineal resections. METHODS: A prospective, observational, national, cohort study which is part of the Norwegian Rectal Cancer Project. The present cohort includes all patients undergoing total mesorectal excision in 47 hospitals during the period November 1993 to December 1999. A total of 2,136 patients with rectal cancer within 12 cm of the anal verge were analyzed; there were 1,315 (62 percent) anterior resections and 821 (38 percent) abdominoperineal resections. The lower edge of the tumor was located 0 to 5 cm from the anal verge in 791 patients, 6 to 8 cm in 558 patients, and 9 to 12 cm in 787 patients. According to the TNM classification, there were 33 percent Stage I, 35 percent Stage II, and 32 percent Stage III. RESULTS: Univariate analyses: The five-year local recurrence rate was 15 percent in the lower level, 13 percent in the intermediate level, and 9 percent in the upper level (P=0.014). It was 10 percent local recurrence after anterior resection and 15 percent after abdominoperineal resection (P=0.008). The five-year survival rate was 59 percent in the lower level, 62 percent in the intermediate level, and 69 percent in the upper level (P<0.001), respectively, and it was 68 percent in the anterior-resection group and 55 percent in the abdominoperineal-resection group (P<0.001). Multivariate analyses: The level of the tumor influenced the risk of local recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1-2.3), but the operative procedure, anterior resection vs. abdominoperineal resection, did not (hazard ratio, 1.2; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.7-1.8). On the contrary, operative procedure influenced survival (hazard ratio, 1.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 1-1.6), but tumor level did not (hazard ratio, 1.1; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.9-1.5). In addition to patient and tumor characteristics (T4 tumors), intraoperative bowel perforation and tumor involvement of the circumferential margin were identified as significant prognostic factors, which were more common in the lower rectum, explaining the inferior prognosis for tumors in this region. CONCLUSIONS: T4 tumors, R1 resections, and/or intraoperative perforation of the tumor or bowel wall are main features of low rectal cancers, causing inferior oncologic outcomes for tumors in this area. If surgery is optimized, preventing intraoperative perforation and involvement of the circumferential resection margin, the prognosis for cancers of the lower rectum seems not to be inherently different from that for tumors at higher levels. In that case, the level of the tumor or the type of resection will not be indicators for selecting patients for radiotherapy.

Abdomen↗
PubMed2006

Evaluation of the risk of a nonrestorative resection for the treatment of diverticular disease: the Cleveland Clinic diverticular disease propensity score.

PURPOSE: The choice of operation for diverticular disease is a contentious issue, particularly in patients with acute symptoms. This study compares early outcomes between primary resection and anastomosis and Hartmann's resection and describes a propensity score for the selection of patients for nonrestorative procedures. METHODS: Data were collected from 731 patients undergoing primary resection and anastomosis (Group 1) and 123 patients undergoing primary Hartmann's resection (Group 2) for diverticular disease in a single tertiary referral center from January 1981 to May 2003. Multifactorial logistic regression was used to develop a propensity score for estimating the likelihood of performing a nonrestorative procedure. RESULTS: Operative 30-day mortality and surgical or medical complications were 0.7 percent, 26.0 percent, and 4.8 percent for primary resection and anastomosis and 12 percent, 43.9 percent, and 14.6 percent for Hartmann's resection, respectively (P < 0.001). There was no difference in the readmission rates between primary resection and anastomosis and Hartmann's resection (7.6 percent vs. 9.9 percent, P = 0.428). Laparoscopy was used for 32.7 percent of primary resection and anastomosis vs. 1.6 percent for Hartmann's resection (P < 0.001). Independent predictors in favor for Hartmann's resection were body mass index > or = 30 kg/m2 (odd's ratio = 2.32), Mannheim peritonitis index >10 (odd's ratio = 6.75), operative urgency (emergency, urgent vs. elective surgery, odd's ratio = 16.08 vs. 13.32), and Hinchey stage > II (odd's ratio = 27.82). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the choice of operative procedure was 93.9 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Although Hartmann's resection was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative adverse events, the choice of operation was dependent on the patient presentation and intra-abdominal contamination, which can be quantified in the preoperative setting by the Cleveland Clinic diverticulitis propensity score.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗
PubMed2006

Laparoscopic and open anterior resection for upper and mid rectal cancer: an evaluation of outcomes.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic anterior resection with open operation for mid and upper rectal cancer. METHODS: A total of 265 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic or open anterior resection for cancer of the mid and upper rectum from June 2000 to December 2004 were included. Data about the patients' demographics, operative details, postoperative outcome, and disease status were collected prospectively. Comparison of the outcome between laparoscopic and open resection was performed. RESULTS: The median age of the 265 patients was 69 (range, 27-91) years, and laparoscopic anterior resection was performed in 98 patients (37 percent). There was no difference in the age, gender, comorbidities, and level of tumor between the two groups. The operating time was longer in the laparoscopic group (200 vs. 127 minutes; P < 0.01), but the blood loss was less (200 vs. 250 ml; P = 0.027). The overall operative mortality was 1.8 percent, and the complication rate was 27.9 percent. Significantly more patients with early diseases (Stage I and Stage II) were operated with laparoscopic approach. There was no difference in the mortality or morbidity between the two groups. Anastomotic leakage occurred in five patients with open resection and one with laparoscopic resection (P = 0.418). Patients with laparoscopic resection had an earlier return of bowel function and earlier resumption of diet as well as a shorter median hospital stay (7 vs. 8 days; P < 0.001). With the median follow-up of the surviving patients for 21.2 months, the three-year local recurrence rates for those with open and laparoscopic resection were 4.9 and 3.3 percent, respectively (P = 0.513). In patients with Stage I and Stage II disease, the three-year cancer-specific survivals for open and laparoscopic resection were 89.8 and 88.6 percent, respectively (P = 0.882), whereas those of patients with Stage III disease were 65.6 and 55.5 percent, respectively (P = 0.911). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic anterior resection for mid and proximal rectal cancer is a safe option with short-term advantages compared with open operation. The oncologic outcomes of patients who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection were not compromised, with similar local recurrence rate and the cancer-specific survival rate as patients who underwent open resection.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Extended resection of pulmonary metastases: is the risk justified?

Extended resection of pulmonary metastases by pneumonectomy or by pulmonary resection en bloc with chest wall or other thoracic structures (diaphragm, pericardium, superior vena cava) is infrequently performed as survival benefit is presumed low. Between 1981 and 1992, 38 patients underwent extended resection for pulmonary metastases (24 men, 14 women; average age, 48 years) from various primary neoplasms. Thirty-three patients (33/38, 87%) had complete resection. Five-year actuarial survival was 25.4%. Mortality was 5.3% (2/38) and occurred in patients undergoing pneumonectomy (2/19, 10.5%). Nineteen patients underwent pneumonectomy, and 19 patients had other assorted resections: pulmonary resection en bloc with chest wall in 11 and pulmonary resection en bloc with other thoracic structures in 8. Actuarial median survival (median, 27 months) did not differ between patients having pneumonectomy and those having pulmonary resection en bloc with chest wall or other thoracic structures. Initial disease-free interval (median) was no different between those patients undergoing pneumonectomy (32 months) or other type resection (35 months; p = 0.16). Median survival for extended resection as the initial operation for pulmonary metastases was 28 months compared with 14 months for all others (p = 0.095). Pneumonectomy for pulmonary metastases may be performed with operative risk equivalent to pneumonectomy for primary bronchogenic carcinoma. Patients may safely undergo extended resection of pulmonary metastases by pneumonectomy or in continuity with chest wall or other thoracic structures. Despite advanced localized metastatic disease, some patients achieve long-term survival after pneumonectomy and extended resection for pulmonary metastases.

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed2006

[Locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Chemoradiotherapy, reevaluation and secondary resection].

UNLABELLED: Induction chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may downstage locally advanced pancreatic tumors but secondary resections are unfrequent. However some responders' patients may benefit of a R0 resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report 18 resections among 29 locally advanced pancreatic cancers; 15 patients were treated with neoadjuvant 5-FU-cisplatin based (13) or taxotere based (2 patients) chemoradiotherapy (45 Gy), and 3 patients without histologically proven adenocarcinoma were resected without any preoperative treatment. RESULTS: The morbidity rate was 28% and the mortality rate was 7%; one patient died after resection (5.5%) and one died after exploration (9%). The R0 resection rate was 50%. The median survival for the resected patients was not reached and the actuarial survival at 3 years was 59%. Two specimens showed no residual tumor and the two patients were alive at 15 and 46 months without recurrence; one specimen showed less than 10% viable tumoral cells and the patient was alive at 36 months without recurrence. A mesenteric infarction was the cause of a late death at 3 years in a disease free patient (radiation induced injury of the superior mesenteric artery). The median survival of the 11 non-resected patients was 21 months and the actuarial survival at 2 years was 0%. When the number of the resected patients (18) was reported to the entire cohort of the patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated during the same period in our institution, the secondary resectability rate was 9%. CONCLUSION: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy identifies poor surgical candidates through observation and may enhance the margin status of patients undergoing secondary resection for locally advanced tumors. However it remains difficult to evaluate the results in the literature because of the variations in the definitions of resectability. The best therapeutic strategy remains to be defined, because the majority of patients ultimately succumb with distant metastatic disease.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2006

Combined hepatic and inferior vena cava resection for colorectal metastases.

Surgical resection continues to offer the only hope for cure of colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver. Tumor involvement of the vena cava is often viewed as a contraindication to surgical resection. Whereas proven technically feasible, the survival advantages of en bloc liver and vena cava resection remain unclear. We reviewed all patients at a tertiary care center who had resection of colorectal liver metastases, including those with vena cava resections. Eleven patients had en bloc liver and vena cava resection between 1988 and 2002; during the same time period, 97 patients underwent isolated liver resection. There were no perioperative deaths in the 11 patients. All resections had negative histological margins. Mean follow-up was 33 months from the date of surgery. Median disease-free survival of the group having caval resections was 9 months, whereas median survival was 34 months. When compared to the cohort of isolated hepatic resections, the group undergoing caval resections experienced a significantly reduced disease-free survival of 18.6 vs. 9.1 months, respectively (P = 0.03); however, there was no difference in overall survival between the two groups at 55.2 vs. 34.3 months, respectively (P = 0.20). Colorectal liver metastases involving the vena cava should be considered for surgical resection.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Benefits of resection for metachronous lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The benefits of resection for metachronous lung cancer are not well described. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of surgical resection for metachronous lung cancers. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of all patients who underwent a second resection for a metachronous lung cancer from July 1, 1988, to December 31, 2002. Type of resection, operative morbidity, mortality, and survival by stage were analyzed. Survival was determined by using the Kaplan-Meier survival method. All patients were pathologically staged by using the 1997 American Joint Committee on Cancer standards. RESULTS: Pulmonary resections were performed in 69 patients who had undergone a previous resection. The mean interval between the first and second resection was 2.4 +/- 2.5 years. Seventy-three percent of patients presented with stage I cancers, 9% with stage II cancers, and 17% with stage III cancers. Lobectomy and wedge resection were performed with equal frequency (42% each) for the metachronous cancers. Operative mortality for the second resection was 5.8%. The mean follow-up after the second resection was 37 months. Overall 5-year actuarial survival for the entire group after the second resection was 33.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Operations for metachronous cancers provided survival that approximated the expected survival for lung cancer. Surgical intervention should be considered as a safe and effective treatment for resectable metachronous lung cancer in patients with adequate physiologic pulmonary reserve.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Radical sublobar resection for small-sized non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: At present, even when early-stage, small-sized non-small cell lung cancers are being increasingly detected, lesser resection has not become the treatment of choice. We sought to compare sublobar resection (segmentectomy or wedge resection) with lobar resection to test which one is the appropriate procedure for such lesions. METHODS: From 1992 to 2001, a nonrandomized study was performed in 3 institutes for patients with a peripheral cT1N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer of 2 cm or less who were able to tolerate a lobectomy. The results of the sublobar resection group enrolled preoperatively (n = 305) were compared with those of the lobar resection group (n = 262). RESULTS: Except for distribution of tumor location, there were no significant differences in any variable, patient characteristics, curability, pathologic stage, morbidity, or recurrence rate. Median follow-up was more than 5 years. Disease-free and overall survivals were similar in both groups with 5-year survivals of 85.9% and 89.6% for the sublobar resection group and 83.4% and 89.1% for the lobar resection group, respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the recurrence rate and prognosis associated with sublobar resection were not inferior to those obtained with lobar resection. Postoperative lung function was significantly better in patients who underwent sublobar resection. CONCLUSIONS: Sublobar resection should be considered as an alternative for stage IA non-small cell lung cancers 2 cm or less, even in low-risk patients. These results could lay the foundation for starting randomized controlled trials anew, which would bring great changes of lung cancer surgery in this era of early detection of lung cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Hepatic colorectal metastases: methods of improving resectability.

Surgery is the best treatment modality for colorectal liver metastases. When initially unresectable, hepatic resection of metastases after downstaging by chemotherapy can provide a hope of long-term survival similar to that of primarily resected patients. Definitions of resectability have evolved with the emerging principle that if metastases can be completely resected regardless of their size and number,resection should be performed as the sole mean of achieving long-term survival. Specific surgical techniques can be combined to improve resectability. If the tumor is considered unresectable, recent developments make possible to render some tumors surgically resectable. Depending on the tumor size, number and location, neoadjuvant treatments, mainly chemotherapy, can be used, followed by resection. Resection may be contraindicated if the residual volume of liver is inadequate to avoid liver failure. This may be changed either by PVE or two-stage hepatectomy, both of which use the natural regenerative capacity of the liver. Local destructive therapies such as cryosurgery and radio-frequency can also be used in conjunction with resection for patients in whom all metastases are not surgically resectable. The present use of these ablative techniques is improving the percentages of unresectable patients considered for surgery. All of the above-described methods can be combined to achieve a surgical strategy that is as curative as possible, increasing the number of patients primarily unresectable, with a long-term survival hope similar to that of primarily resectable patients. To achieve this objective, a close collaboration between oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons is mandatory, with routine re-evaluation of patients for an adequate timing of each treatment.

Chemoembolization, Therapeutic↗
PubMed2005

Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis: efficacy of T2 and T3 ganglion resection.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy has been considered an effective treatment for palmar hyperhidrosis. However, the extent of resection has not been determined in terms of efficacy and complications. We compared the efficacy and complications of 2-ganglion and single-ganglion resection in patients with palmar hyperhidrosis. METHODS: From 1995 to 2000, 75 patients underwent resection of thoracic ganglion T2 and T3. From 2000 to 2003, 67 patients underwent resection of only the T2 ganglion. Eighty of the 142 patients (56%) answered a detailed questionnaire, the results of which were analyzed. RESULTS: Gender, age, family history, and distribution of sweating were similar in both groups. Recurrence rates 1 and 2 years after endoscopic thoracic ganglionectomy were between 0% and 3% in T2 and T3 resection, and between 15% and 19% in T2 resection only. In the combined T2 and T3 resection group, 100% of patients noticed compensatory sweating; in T2 resection, 90% of patients noticed compensatory sweating. As for rates of satisfaction, T2 and T3 resection was superior to T2 resection. CONCLUSIONS: High recurrence rates of palmar hyperhidrosis after single-ganglion resection are reported in the present study. Two-ganglion resection is a superior surgical method to prevent recurrence of palmar hyperhidrosis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Comparison of limited and anatomic hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND: The long-term outcome after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma is influenced by factors related to the tumor and the underlying liver disease. The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma is worse in hepatitis C virus antibody-positive patients than in hepatitis B surface antigen-positive patients. In patients with hepatitis C virus infection and hepatocellular carcinoma, the optimum extent of operative resection, i.e., limited versus anatomic, remains controversial. METHODS: Among 247 patients with hepatitis C virus infection who underwent curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma between 1992 and 2003, 213 patients received limited resection and 34 patients had anatomic resection of at least two Couinaud subsegments with complete removal of the portal territory containing the tumor. The clinical characteristics, operative results, and long-term survival of these two groups were compared. RESULTS: Although the patients receiving limited resection had significantly worse preoperative liver function than the patients undergoing anatomic resection, the postoperative liver function of the limited resection group was significantly better. The mortality and morbidity rates were not significantly different after limited and anatomic resection. Disease-free survival and overall survival were similar after both types of resection, as were the incidence and pattern of intrahepatic tumor recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with hepatitis C virus infection and hepatocellular carcinoma, anatomic resection does not provide any significant benefit and should not be carried out unless it is technically necessary. In patients with a limited hepatic functional reserve, removal of the tumor with preservation of the liver parenchyma may take priority over wide resection.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Survival benefits of portal vein resection for pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of portal vein resection for pancreatic cancer is controversial. METHODS: Eighty-one consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing surgical resection were retrospectively analyzed. The clinicopathological findings and relationship between portal vein resection and survival were investigated. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients with pancreatic cancer underwent pancreatic resection with portal vein resection. Histological examination revealed that 17 patients had definite invasion to the portal vein (group 1) and 16 patients had no invasion (group 2). Forty-eight patients with pancreatic cancer underwent pancreatic resection without portal vein resection (group 3). There were no significant differences in survival rates (P = 0.437) between patients with portal vein resection and patients without portal vein resection. However, patients in group 1 had a significantly (P = 0.021) worse prognosis as compared with those in group 2. Despite aggressive surgical resection, the surgical margin was positive in 35% of patients in group 1 as compared with 13% of patients in group 2 and 21% of patients in group 3. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing portal vein resection for pancreatic cancer had a prognosis similar to patients without portal vein resection. Negative microscopic invasion to the portal vein was significantly associated with improved survival.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

Long-term outcome after endoscopic mucosal resection in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma invading the muscularis mucosae or deeper.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic mucosal resection is recommended for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus confined to the lamina propria. However, endoscopic mucosal resection is often performed in patients with tumors that invade the muscularis mucosa or upper submucosa to minimize surgical invasiveness, despite the increased risk of lymph node metastasis. This study prospectively evaluated long-term outcome in such patients. METHODS: Twenty-six consecutive patients with squamous cell esophageal carcinoma invading the muscularis mucosa or submucosa who underwent endoscopic mucosal resection from June 1992 through March 2000 (extended endoscopic mucosal resection group) were studied. As control group, 44 consecutive patients with esophageal carcinoma invading the muscularis mucosae or upper third of the submucosa and no preoperative evidence of lymph node metastasis who underwent esophagectomy during the same period (surgical resection group) were studied. RESULTS: Overall survival rates at 5 years in the extended endoscopic mucosal resection group and surgical resection group were, respectively, 77.4% and 84.5%. There was no significant difference between survival distributions. Cause-specific survival rates at 5 years in extended endoscopic mucosal resection and surgical resection groups were, respectively, 95.0% and 93.5%. Survival curves for the groups were similar. CONCLUSION: Although patients were not randomized to extended endoscopic mucosal resection or surgical resection in this study, the results suggest that endoscopic mucosal resection may be safe and effective for management of squamous cell esophageal carcinoma invading the muscularis mucosae or upper submucosa.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Wedge resection versus lobectomy for stage I (T1 N0 M0) non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The role of nonanatomic wedge resection in the management of stage I (T1 N0 M0) non-small-cell lung cancer continues to be debated against the present gold standard of care--anatomic lobectomy. METHODS: We analyzed the results of 219 consecutive patients with pathologic stage I (T1 N0 M0) non-small-cell lung cancer who underwent open wedge resection (n = 42), video-assisted wedge resection (n = 60), and lobectomy (n = 117) to assess morbidity, recurrence, and survival differences between these approaches. RESULTS: There were no differences among the three groups with regard to histologic tumor type. Analysis demonstrated the wedge resection groups to be significantly older and to have reduced pulmonary function despite a higher incidence of treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease when compared with patients having lobectomy. The mean hospital stay was significantly less in the wedge resection groups. There were no operative deaths among patients having wedge resection; however, a 3% operative mortality occurred among patients having lobectomy (p = 0.20). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were nearly identical at 1 year (open wedge resection, 94%; video-assisted wedge resection, 95%; lobectomy, 91%). At 5 years survival was 58% for patients having open wedge resection, 65% for those having video-assisted wedge resection, and 70% for those having lobectomy. Log rank testing demonstrated significant differences between the survival curves during the 5-year period of study (p = 0.02). This difference was a result of a significantly greater non-cancer-related death rate by 5 years among patients having wedge resection (38% vs 18% for those having lobectomy; p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Wedge resection, done by open thoracotomy or video-assisted techniques, appears to be a viable "compromise" surgical treatment of stage I (T1 N0 M0) non-small-cell lung cancer for patients with cardiopulmonary physiologic impairment. Because of the increased risk for local recurrence, anatomic lobectomy remains the surgical treatment of choice for patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer who have adequate physiologic reserve.

Aged↗