Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Repression domains”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 667 records · Page 37Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

CREB-binding protein and histone deacetylase regulate the transcriptional activity of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus open reading frame 50.

Kaposi's sarcoma (KS)-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) open reading frame 50 (ORF50) encodes a viral transcriptional activator, which binds to the KSHV promoter and stimulates the transcription of viral early and late genes, thus activating the lytic cycle of KSHV. We report here that KSHV ORF50 binds to the cellular proteins CREB-binding protein (CBP) and histone deacetylase (HDAC) and these binding events modulate ORF50-activated viral transcription. Binding of ORF50 to CBP and HDAC activates and represses, respectively, ORF50-mediated viral transcription. KSHV ORF50 was shown to bind to the C/H3 domain and the C-terminal transcriptional activation domain of CBP, while CBP bound to the amino-terminal basic domain and the carboxyl-terminal transactivation domain of ORF50. The LXXLL motif within the transcriptional activation domain of ORF50 is reminiscent of the CBP-binding sequence found in nuclear receptor proteins. The adenovirus E1A protein, which also binds to the C/H3 domain of CBP, repressed the transcriptional activation activity of ORF50. The cellular protein c-Jun, which binds to the kinase-induced activation domain of ORF50, stimulated ORF50-mediated viral transcription. The HDAC1-interacting domain of ORF50 was shown to be a central proline-rich sequence. Our data provide a framework for delineating the regulatory mechanisms used by KSHV to modulate its transcription and replication through interaction with both histone acetyltransferases and HDACs.

CREB-Binding Protein↗
PubMed2004

The RING domain of Mdm2 mediates histone ubiquitylation and transcriptional repression.

Histone modifications play a pivotal role in regulating transcription and other chromatin-associated processes. In yeast, histone H2B monoubiquitylation affects gene silencing. However, mammalian histone ubiquitylation remains poorly understood. We report that the Mdm2 oncoprotein, a RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligase known to ubiquitylate the p53 tumor suppressor protein, can interact directly with histones and promote in vitro monoubiquitylation of histones H2A and H2B. Moreover, Mdm2 induces H2B monoubiquitylation in vivo. Endogenous Mdm2 is tethered in vivo, presumably via p53, to chromatin comprising the p53-responsive p21(waf1) promoter, and Mdm2 overexpression enhances protein ubiquitylation in the vicinity of a p53 binding site within that promoter. Moreover, when recruited to a promoter in the absence of p53, Mdm2 can repress transcription dependently on its RING domain, suggesting that its E3 activity contributes to repression. Histone ubiquitylation may thus constitute a novel mechanism of transcriptional repression by Mdm2, possibly underlying some of its oncogenic activities.

Cell Line↗
PubMed2005

SUMO represses transcriptional activity of the Drosophila SoxNeuro and human Sox3 central nervous system-specific transcription factors.

Sry high mobility group (HMG) box (Sox) transcription factors are involved in the development of central nervous system (CNS) in all metazoans. Little is known on the molecular mechanisms that regulate their transcriptional activity. Covalent posttranslational modification by small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) regulates several nuclear events, including the transcriptional activity of transcription factors. Here, we demonstrate that SoxNeuro, an HMG box-containing transcription factor involved in neuroblast formation in Drosophila, is a substrate for SUMO modification. SUMOylation assays in HeLa cells and Drosophila S2 cells reveal that lysine 439 is the major SUMO acceptor site. The sequence in SoxNeuro targeted for SUMOylation, IKSE, is part of a small inhibitory domain, able to repress in cis the activity of two adjacent transcriptional activation domains. Our data show that SUMO modification represses SoxNeuro transcriptional activity in transfected cells. Overexpression in Drosophila embryos of a SoxN form that cannot be targeted for SUMOylation strongly impairs the development of the CNS, suggesting that SUMO modification of SoxN is crucial for regulating its activity in vivo. Finally, we present evidence that SUMO modification of group B1 Sox factors was conserved during evolution, because Sox3, the human counterpart of SoxN, is also negatively regulated through SUMO modification.

Amino Acid Motifs↗
PubMed2006

Differential recruitment of methylated CpG binding domains by the orphan receptor GCNF initiates the repression and silencing of Oct4 expression.

The pluripotent factor Oct4 is a key transcription factor that maintains embryonic stem (ES) cell self-renewal and is down-regulated upon the differentiation of ES cells and silenced in somatic cells. A combination of cis elements, transcription factors, and epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation, are involved in the regulation of Oct4 gene expression. Here we show that the orphan nuclear receptor GCNF initiates Oct4 repression and DNA methylation by the differential recruitment of MBD (methylated CpG binding domain) factors to the promoter. Compared with wild-type ES cells and gastrulating embryos, Oct4 repression is lost and its proximal promoter is significantly hypomethylated in RA-differentiated GCNF(-/-) ES cells. The Oct4 gene is reexpressed in some somatic cells of GCNF(-/-) embryos, showing that it has not been properly silenced coincident with reduced DNA methylation of its promoter. Efforts to characterize mediators of GCNF's repressive function and DNA methylation of the Oct4 promoter identified methyl-DNA binding proteins, MBD3 and MBD2, as GCNF-interacting factors. In P19 and ES cells, upon differentiation, endogenous GCNF binds to the Oct4 proximal promoter and differentially recruits MBD3 and MBD2. In differentiated GCNF(-/-) ES cells, recruitment of MBD3 and MBD2 to the Oct4 promoter is lost, and repression of Oct4 expression and DNA methylation fails to occur. RNA interference-mediated knockdown of MBD3 and/or MBD2 expression results in reduced Oct4 repression in differentiated P19 and ES cells. Repression of Oct4 expression and recruitment of MBD3 are maintained in de novo DNA methylation-deficient ES cells (Dnmt3A/3B-null cells), while MBD2 recruitment is lost. Thus, recruitment of MBD3 and MBD2 by GCNF links two events, gene-specific repression and DNA methylation, which occur differentially at the Oct4 promoter. GCNF initiates the repression and epigenetic modification of Oct4 gene during ES cell differentiation.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2000

Molecular characterization of the VIP receptor transcriptional repressor protein.

The rat type 1 VIP receptor transcriptional repressor protein (VIPR-RP) is a recently isolated novel transcription factor. In the study reported here, the functional domains of VIPR-RP were characterized. To map the DNA binding domain, various regions of VIPR-RP were either transcribed and translated in vitro or expressed in and purified from E. Coli as a glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion. The ability of the truncated proteins to bind to VIPR-RP specific binding sequence was tested by gel mobility shift assays. The results indicated that the amino acid sequences between 367 and 475 play an essential role for VIPR-RP DNA binding. To determine the amino acid sequences required for transcriptional repression, fusion proteins containing the GAL4 DNA binding domain and various parts of VIPR-RP were constructed, and their ability to repress transcription of the reporter gene containing GAL4 DNA binding sequences were tested in transiently transfected COS7 cells. The results showed that VIPR-RP contains two separate transcriptional repression domains located between amino acids 50 to 101 and 470 to 527.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

An NRSF/REST-like repressor downstream of Ebi/SMRTER/Su(H) regulates eye development in Drosophila.

The corepressor complex that includes Ebi and SMRTER is a target of epidermal growth factor (EGF) and Notch signaling pathways and regulates Delta (Dl)-mediated induction of support cells adjacent to photoreceptor neurons of the Drosophila eye. We describe a mechanism by which the Ebi/SMRTER corepressor complex maintains Dl expression. We identified a gene, charlatan (chn), which encodes a C2H2-type zinc-finger protein resembling human neuronal restricted silencing factor/repressor element RE-1 silencing transcription factor (NRSF/REST). The Ebi/SMRTER corepressor complex represses chn transcription by competing with the activation complex that includes the Notch intracellular domain (NICD). Chn represses Dl expression and is critical for the initiation of eye development. Thus, under EGF signaling, double negative regulation mediated by the Ebi/SMRTER corepressor complex and an NRSF/REST-like factor, Chn, maintains inductive activity in developing photoreceptor cells by promoting Dl expression.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1991

An "attenuator domain" is sandwiched by two distinct transactivation domains in the transcription factor C/EBP.

C/EBP is a rat liver DNA-binding protein which can act as a transcription factor. Its N-terminal portion contains three distinct domains. The first domain (amino acids 1 to 107) appears to be a highly potent transactivator. The second domain (amino acids 107 to 170) does not appear to exhibit either activation or repression activity. This domain is defined as an "attenuator domain" because its presence under four different sequence contexts reproducibly decreases the effect of transactivation of C/EBP. The third domain (amino acids 171 to 245) is a relatively weaker transactivator with a striking proline-rich motif. Deletional analysis of this third domain has shown that a 45-amino-acid region is sufficient for transactivation. This region (amino acids 171 to 215) contains 12 proline, 6 histidine, and mainly hydrophobic or noncharged amino acids. Further mutational analysis of a highly conserved proline-octamer region within this domain indicates that a specific proline content is not crucial for transactivation.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2002

Microarray deacetylation maps determine genome-wide functions for yeast histone deacetylases.

Yeast contains a family of five related histone deacetylases (HDACs) whose functions are known at few genes. Therefore, we used chromatin immunoprecipitation and intergenic microarrays to generate genome-wide HDAC enzyme activity maps. Rpd3 and Hda1 deacetylate mainly distinct promoters and gene classes where they are recruited largely by novel mechanisms. Hda1 also deacetylates subtelomeric domains containing normally repressed genes that are used instead for gluconeogenesis, growth on carbon sources other than glucose, and adverse growth conditions. These domains have certain features of heterochromatin but are distinct from subtelomeric heterochromatin repressed by the deacetylase Sir2. Finally, Hos1/Hos3 and Hos2 preferentially affect ribosomal DNA and ribosomal protein genes, respectively. Thus, acetylation microarrays uncover the "division of labor" for yeast histone deacetylases.

Carrier Proteins↗
PubMed1999

Oxygen-regulated and transactivating domains in endothelial PAS protein 1: comparison with hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha.

Endothelial PAS protein 1 (EPAS1) is a basic helix-loop-helix Per-AHR-ARNT-Sim transcription factor related to hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha (HIF-1alpha). To analyze EPAS1 domains responsible for transactivation and oxygen-regulated function, we constructed chimeric fusions of EPAS1 with a GAL4 DNA binding domain, plus or minus the VP16 activation domain. Two transactivation domains were defined in EPAS1; a C-terminal domain (amino acids 828-870), and a larger internal domain (amino acids 517-682). These activation domains were interspersed by functionally repressive sequences, several of which independently conveyed oxygen-regulated activity. Two types of activity were defined. Sequences lying N-terminal to and overlapping the internal transactivation domain conferred regulated repression on the VP16 transactivator. Sequences lying C-terminal to this internal domain conveyed repression and oxygen-regulated activity on the native EPAS1 C-terminal activation domain, but not the Gal/VP16 fusion. Fusions containing internal but not C-terminal regulatory domains manifested regulation of fusion protein level. Comparison of EPAS1 with HIF-1alpha demonstrated a similar organization for both proteins, and for the C terminus defined a conserved RLL motif critical for inducibility. Overall, EPAS1 sequences were less inducible than those of HIF-1alpha, and inducibility was strikingly reduced as their expression level was increased. Despite these quantitative differences, EPAS1 regulation appeared similar to HIF-1alpha, conforming to a model involving the modulation of both protein level and activity, through distinct internal and C-terminal domains.

Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Proteins↗
PubMed2001

An active role for a structured B-linker in effector control of the sigma54-dependent regulator DmpR.

The activities of many prokaryotic sigma54-dependent transcriptional activators are controlled by the N-terminal A-domain of the protein, which is linked to the central transcriptional activation domain via a short B-linker. It used to be thought that these B-linkers simply serve as flexible tethers. Here we show that the B-linker of the aromatic-responsive regulator DmpR and many other regulators of the family contain signature heptad repeats with regularly spaced hydrophobic amino acids. Mutant analysis of this region of DmpR demonstrates that B-linker function is dependent on the heptad repeats and is critical for activation of the protein by aromatic effectors. The phenotypes of DmpR mutants refute the existing model that the level of ATPase activity directly controls the level of transcription it promotes. The mutant analysis also shows that the B-linker is involved in repression of ATPase activity and that allosteric changes upon effector binding are transduced to alleviate both B-linker repression of ATP hydrolysis and A-domain repression of transcriptional activation. The mechanistic implications of these findings for DmpR and other family members are discussed.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed1996

Transcriptional repression by RING finger protein TIF1 beta that interacts with the KRAB repressor domain of KOX1.

Many of the vertebrate zinc finger factors of the Kruppel type (C2H2 zinc fingers) contain in their N-terminus a conserved sequence referred to as the KRAB (Kruppel-associated box) domain that, when tethered to DNA, efficiently represses transcription. Using the yeast two-hybrid system, we have isolated an 835 amino acid RING finger (C3HC4 zinc finger) protein, TIF1 beta (also named KAP-1), that specifically interacts with the KRAB domain of the human zinc finger factor KOX1/ZNF10. TIF1 beta, TIF1 alpha, PML and efp belong to a characteristic subgroup of RING finger proteins that contain one or two other Cys/His-rich clusters (B boxes) and a putative coiled-coil in addition to the classical C3HC4 RING finger motif (RBCC configuration). Like TIF1 alpha, TIF1 beta also contains an additional Cys/His cluster (PHD finger) and a bromo-related domain. When tethered to DNA, TIF1 beta can repress transcription in transiently transfected mammalian cells both from promoter-proximal and remote (enhancer) positions, similarly to the KRAB domain itself. We propose that TIF1 beta is a mediator of the transcriptional repression exerted by the KRAB domain.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2001

The E8 domain confers a novel long-distance transcriptional repression activity on the E8E2C protein of high-risk human papillomavirus type 31.

Infections with high-risk human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are the major risk factor for the development of anogenital cancers. Viral E2 proteins are involved in viral DNA replication and regulation of transcription. Repression of the viral P97 promoter by E2 proteins has been implicated in the modulation of the immortalization capacity and DNA replication properties of high-risk HPVs. Analysis of the cis and trans requirements for repression of the HPV type 31 (HPV31) P97 promoter, however, revealed striking differences between the full-length E2 and the E8E2C fusion protein which were due to conserved residues W6 and K7 of the E8 domain. In contrast to E2, E8E2C completely inhibited the P97 promoter from a single promoter-distal E2 binding site. This novel long-distance repression activity of the E8 domain also enabled E8E2C to inhibit the HPV6a P2 promoter and minimal-promoter constructs containing E2 binding sites. Thus, E8E2C may represent the master repressor of viral gene expression during a high-risk HPV infection, and changes in the activity of E8E2C might contribute to the progression of high-risk HPV-induced lesions.

Conserved Sequence↗
PubMed2000

Active repression of methylated genes by the chromosomal protein MBD1.

MBD1 belongs to a family of mammalian proteins that share a methyl-CpG binding domain. Previous work has shown that MBD1 binds to methylated sites in vivo and in vitro and can repress transcription from methylated templates in transcription extracts and in cultured cells. In the present study we established by several experimental criteria that, contrary to a previous report, MBD1 is not a component of the MeCP1 repressor complex. We identified a powerful transcriptional repression domain (TRD) at the C terminus of MBD1 that can actively repress transcription at a distance. Methylation-dependent repression in vivo depends on the presence of both the TRD and the methyl-CpG binding domain. The mechanism is likely to involve deacetylation, since the deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A can overcome MBD1-mediated repression. Accordingly, we found that endogenous MBD1 is particularly concentrated at sites of centromeric heterochromatin, where acetylated histone H4 is deficient. Unlike MBD2 and MeCP2, MBD1 is not depleted by antibodies to the histone deacetylase HDAC1. Thus, the deacetylase-dependent pathway by which MBD1 actively silences methylated genes is likely to be different from that utilized by the methylation-dependent repressors MeCP1 and MeCP2.

Acetylation↗
PubMed2001

Silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid hormone receptors and activating signal cointegrator-2 as transcriptional coregulators of the orphan nuclear receptor Nur77.

For the orphan nuclear receptor subfamily that includes Nur77 (NGFI-B), Nurr1, and NOR-1, no transcriptional coregulators have been identified thus far. In this report, we found that Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV enhances Nur77 transactivation in cotransfections either alone or in synergy with AF2dependent coactivator ASC-2, whereas corepressor silencing mediator for retinoid and thyroid hormone receptors (SMRT) is repressive. Interestingly, Nur77 interacted with SMRT but did not directly bind ASC-2, and accordingly, the putative AF2 core domain of Nur77 did not affect the Nur77 transactivation. SMRT harbors transferable repression domains that associate with various histone deacetylases. Surprisingly, histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A was unable to block the repressive effect of SMRT while dramatically stimulating the Nur77 transactivation. These results suggest that SMRT and ASC-2 are specific coregulators of Nur77 and that SMRT may dynamically compete with a putative adaptor molecule, which links ASC-2 to Nur77, for the identical binding sites within Nur77 in vivo.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

SUMO modification enhances p66-mediated transcriptional repression of the Mi-2/NuRD complex.

Human p66alpha and p66beta are two potent transcriptional repressors that interact with the methyl-CpG-binding domain proteins MBD2 and MBD3. An analysis of the molecular mechanisms mediating repression resulted in the identification of two major repression domains in p66alpha and one in p66beta. Both p66alpha and p66beta are SUMO-modified in vivo: p66alpha at two sites (Lys-30 and Lys-487) and p66beta at one site (Lys-33). Expression of SUMO1 enhanced the transcriptional repression activity of Gal-p66alpha and Gal-p66beta. Mutation of the SUMO modification sites or using a SUMO1 mutant or a dominant negative Ubc9 ligase resulted in a significant decrease of the transcriptional repression of p66alpha and p66beta. The Mi-2/NuRD components MBD3, RbAp46, RbAp48, and HDAC1 were found to bind to both p66alpha and p66beta in vivo. Most of the interactions were not affected by the SUMO site mutations in p66alpha or p66beta, with two exceptions. HDAC1 binding to p66alpha was lost in the case of a p66alphaK30R mutant, and RbAp46 binding was reduced in the case of a p66betaK33R mutant. These results suggest that interactions within the Mi-2/NuRD complex as well as optimal repression are mediated by SUMOylation.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

DSF nuclear receptor acts as a repressor in culture and in vivo.

Loss-of-function mutations affecting the dissatisfaction (DSF) nuclear receptor alter both sexual behavior and the sex-specific nervous system in Drosophila. As a step toward understanding the way DSF controls development and function of the nervous system, we have analyzed the regulatory activities of the DSF protein. DSF prefers an atypical DNA half site, AAGTCA. Wild-type DSF, but not the point mutant DSF(7), monomerically binds and represses reporter constructs bearing this site. DSF also contains an atypically long, 356-amino-acid hinge separating its DNA-binding domain (DBD) and ligand-binding domain (LBD). The hinge contains at least two functions: a region that drastically lowers DNA-binding efficiency in vitro, and an amino-terminal repressive domain. The DBD and LBD of DSF, along with major portions of the hinge, are highly conserved in other insects. Ectopic expression of DSF in Drosophila imaginal discs results in developmental disruptions in disc-derived tissues, disruptions which are largely suppressed when DSF is fused to the VP16 activation domain, consistent with a repressive role for DSF. Finally, when tethered to DNA, DSF's hinge and LBD regions act as strong transcriptional repressors in multiple larval and pupal tissues, including many DSF-expressing tissues. These results suggest DSF can repress transcription in vivo, that repression is largely responsible for its ectopic expression phenotypes, and that repression may be a key component of normal DSF function.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2002

Mutations in RRM4 uncouple the splicing repression and RNA-binding activities of polypyrimidine tract binding protein.

The polypyrimidine tract binding protein (PTB, or hnRNP I) contains four RNA-binding domains of the ribonucleoprotein fold type (RRMs 1, 2, 3, and 4), and mediates the negative regulation of alternative splicing through sequence-specific binding to intronic splicing repressor elements. To assess the roles of individual RRM domains in splicing repression, a neural-specific splicing extract was used to screen for loss-of-function mutations that fail to switch splicing from the neural to nonneural pathway. These results show that three RRMs are sufficient for wild-type RNA binding and splicing repression activity, provided that RRM4 is intact. Surprisingly, the deletion of RRM4, or as few as 12 RRM4 residues, effectively uncouples these functions. Such an uncoupling phenotype is unique to RRM4, and suggests a possible regulatory role for this domain either in mediating specific RNA contacts, and/or contacts with putative splicing corepressors. Evidence of a role for RRM4 in anchoring PTB binding adjacent to the branch site is shown by mobility shift and RNA footprinting assays.

Alternative Splicing↗
PubMed2005

Vinexin beta interacts with the non-phosphorylated AF-1 domain of retinoid receptor gamma (RARgamma) and represses RARgamma-mediated transcription.

Nuclear retinoic acid receptors (RARs) are ligand-dependent transcription factors that regulate the expression of retinoic acid target genes. Although the importance of RAR phosphorylation in their N-terminal domain is clearly established, the underlying mechanism for the phosphorylation-dependent transcriptional activity of the receptors had not been elucidated yet. Here, using a yeast two-hybrid system, we report the isolation of vinexin beta as a new cofactor that interacts with the N-terminal A/B domain of the RARgamma isotype. Vinexin beta is a multiple SH3 motif-containing protein associated with the cytoskeleton and also present in the nucleus. We demonstrate that vinexin beta colocalizes with RARgamma in the nucleus and interacts with the non-phosphorylated form of the AF-1 domain of RARgamma. We also show that this interaction is prevented upon phosphorylation of the AF-1 domain. Using F9 cells stably overexpressing vinexin beta or vinexin knockdown by RNA interference, we demonstrate that vinexin beta is an inhibitor of RARgamma-mediated transcription. We propose a model in which phosphorylation of the AF-1 domain controls RARgamma-mediated transcription through triggering the dissociation of vinexin beta.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗