Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “REFRIGERATION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 667 records · Page 37Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

The effect of refrigeration and mixing on detection of endotoxin in parenteral drugs using the Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) test.

Prior to testing for the presence of bacterial endotoxin, parenteral products are handled and stored in a variety of ways. Two incidents, detected by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, revealed that differences in product handling and storage may have played a role in causing analytical discrepancies in the testing of identical samples. The testing procedure was the USP Bacterial Endotoxin test using Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) reagent. Consequently, an evaluation was made at the two principal factors that contributed to the suspected analytical anomaly. The factors were sample storage and the degree of agitation prior to sample analysis. Additional variables such as bacterial growth medium and adsorption potential of endotoxin by rubber stoppers were also evaluated. It was found that neither the medium employed to grow the E. coli endotoxin nor the storage temperature of the spiked solutions were problematic. However, it was shown that 20-40% of the spiked endotoxin was lost due to non-agitation of solution in vials in which the solution was in contact with the rubber stoppers. A suggested remedy for this problem is to store intact product containers in an upright position and to establish a uniform mixing procedure prior to endotoxin assay.

Endotoxins↗