Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PRESBYOPIA”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 667 records · Page 37Linked to original sources

Does the presbyopic visual system adapt to contact lenses?

We studied whether task performance improves during the initial wearing period of selected presbyopic contact lens corrections. In three previous studies significant decreases in performance on three selected tasks were measured before and after initial wearing periods to monovision contact lenses (N = 18, 8 weeks of wear), concentric bifocal lenses (N = 32, 8 weeks), and diffractive and monovision lenses (N = 20, 3 weeks). In each study, the control condition was distance contact lenses with reading spectacles. The decreases in performance speed ranged from 2 to 15% compared to control. In this study, we retrospectively analyze the data to determine whether the task performance decreases relative to control were significantly different after the initial wearing period than at the time of dispensing--i.e., did measures of task performance show an adaptation to the presbyopic contact lens correction? Performance adaptation on each task and for each study was analyzed statistically using the Wilcoxon matched pair signed rank test of each subject's mean performance differences (test vs. control condition) at dispensing compared to the performance at the end of the wearing period. There was no improvement in task performance with monovision or diffractive bifocal lenses. However, we found significant improvements in task performance with concentric bifocal lenses (p < 0.05). Measures of visual acuity and stereoacuity did not improve with these lenses during the studied wearing period. Thus, these basic visual skills did not adapt. The ability of patients to learn how to use reduced visual acuity to perform complex tasks is a possible explanation for the improved task performance with concentric bifocal lenses compared to control.

Adaptation, Ocular↗

Infrared pupillometry in presbyopes fitted with soft contact lenses.

The influence of pupil size, lens centration, and translation on multifocal contact lens performance suggests that these parameters should be accounted for in the optical design of presbyopic contact lenses. The purpose of the present article is to complete the existing experimental data with clinical measurements of pupil diameter and lens position relative to the pupil in a group of presbyopes, with controlled target luminance, stimulus distance, gaze angle, and convergence. The experiments involve an infrared video-pupillometer and ring-marked contact lenses. Results on pupil aperture show that the effect of changing target distance is comparable in magnitude to that of varying luminance within the photopic range. The measured data on lens position confirm that soft contact lenses are generally decentered from the pupillary axis, usually in inferior temporal direction, and that their average translation between primary and downward gaze is very small. It is also found that the average relative position between lens and pupil centers is slightly modified by changes of luminance in far vision. All these results provide characteristic values which are helpful for the optical modelling of presbyopic contact lenses.

Adult↗

Relationship between contour plots and the limits of "clear and comfortable" vision in the near zone of progressive addition lenses.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine the relationship between the magnitude of surface astigmatism and subjective estimates of unacceptable blur flanking the near zone of progressive addition lenses (PALs). METHODS: Eleven presbyopic subjects observed a row of capital letters at a distance of 40 cm looking left and right within the near zone of six 2.00 D add PAL designs, stopping when they reached the limits of "clear and comfortable" vision. Eye rotations were measured by video-based pupil and corneal reflection tracking. RESULTS: There is a good correspondence between the 1.00 D astigmatic contour and the limits of clear and comfortable vision in the near zone of the six 2.00 D and PALs used in this experiment. CONCLUSIONS: Although the 1.00 D astigmatic contour indicates the boundary of clear vision, there are a number of caveats associated with the 1.00 D metric including the influence of laterally declining add power on perceived blur.

Eyeglasses↗

Simulated in situ optical performance of bifocal contact lenses.

A model of the presbyopic eye in various viewing conditions is derived as a combination of average clinical data with a monochromatic eye model. The modulation transfer function (MTF), obtained through Fourier optics calculations, is used to define new metrics, which help to predict the visual performance of multifocal contact lenses. The model is applied to the optimization of concentric bifocal contact lenses (BCLs): the optimal center optimal zone diameter (COZD) is determined as a function of the lens addition and decentration, in order to achieve similar average performance in distance and near vision. Calculations predict a decrease of the overall visual performance of optimized bifocal lenses with increasing addition. They also show that a lens shift relative to the pupil has opposite effects on the performance of center near (CN) and center distance (CD) designs. The comparison between these two types of bifocals suggests that better overall performance is obtained when the near correction is supported by the center optical zone. These theoretical predictions are found to be compatible with anterior clinical results obtained with BCLs.

Contact Lenses↗

Visual and nonvisual variables implicated in monovision wear.

BACKGROUND: Although both psychological and visual factors have been suggested to influence successful monovision contact lens wear, there has not been any documentation to support the relationship between psychological factors and the outcome of monovision wear. In our study, the relative importance of various visual and psychological factors were investigated in an attempt to provide a profile of a successful monovision wearer. METHODS: Participants, who had never worn monovision lenses were fitted with distance contact lenses for an adaptation period of 2 weeks; thereafter, 67 participants wore monovision lenses for 2 weeks. RESULTS: Of the participants, 67% stated that based on their visual experience they would continue monovision wear. Discriminant analysis indicated that one of the personality factors in Cattell's 16 Personality Factor (16 PF) test, "superego strength," could be used, in conjunction with the difference between binocular and monovision stereopsis scores, in predicting the success of monovision in 68% of the cases. The variables of age, gender, pupil size, immediate reaction to monovision, motivation, self-efficacy distance, and near refractive error could not be used to predict successful monovision wear. CONCLUSIONS: These result demonstrate that psychological factors are indeed important in monovision wear.

Adaptation, Ocular↗

Change in refractive anisometropia in presbyopic adults wearing monovision contact lens correction.

BACKGROUND: Researchers studying the refractive development of infant monkeys suggest that monocular refractive error changes in response to induced ametropia; specifically, slightly blurring one eye may cause a difference to develop between each eye's correction (anisometropia) when none existed before wearing the correction. The important question of whether similar changes occur in humans has not been addressed. METHODS: We compared premonovision correction and the correction after at least 12 months of monovision soft contact lens wear (artificially induced anisometropia prescribed to focus one eye for near and the other for distance so that bifocal glasses are not needed) for 62 healthy predominantly female soft contact lens wearers and (a) 62 age- and sex-matched spectacle wearers and (b) 62 age- and generally sex-matched contact lens wearers. Control patients wore corrections of like power and had similar follow-up periods. RESULTS: Development of anisometropia occurred significantly more frequently among monovision wearers than among spectacle (p = 0.043) or contact lens wearing controls (p = 0.025). Changes in anisometropia greater than or equal to 0.50 D, with amounts up to 1.25 D, occurred in 29% of monovision wearers. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in refractive correction occur for adults who have monocular blur intentionally induced with monovision contact lenses. Similar changes may also occur after refractive surgery if one eye is corrected for a different distance than the other. Care should be taken when counseling presbyopic patients so that they are aware of the possibility of inducing refractive changes after monovision correction.

Adult↗

Loss of visual acuity is the main reason why reading addition increases after the age of sixty.

PURPOSE: To determine why the reading addition increases after the age of 55 to 60 years when accommodation is zero. METHODS: Distance and near visual acuities, arm length, habitual near working distance, reading addition, and pupil diameter were measured in 44 subjects aged >60 years (mean, 72.9 +/- 5.7). Reading addition values were attained using three techniques: least-plus addition using both N-notation text and MN-READ text and the cross-cylinder technique. RESULTS: The mean dioptric working distance was 2.75 +/- 0.40 D. The reading addition found using N-notation text (+2.21 +/- 0.38 D) was significantly lower than that measured using MN-READ text (+2.48 +/- 0.49 D) or the cross-cylinder method (+2.53 +/- 0.44 D). The reading addition was positively correlated with the dioptric working distance (r = 0.47, p < 0.01), and decreasing habitual working distance was associated with poorer visual acuity (r = -0.42, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that decreases in near visual acuity after 60 years of age lead to a reduction in habitual working distance, which increases text angular subtense. In turn, the reduced working distance requires a greater reading addition. Increases in depth of field associated with both suprathreshold text (N-notation) and lower visual acuity lead to reading additions being less than the dioptric working distance.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

Theoretical analysis of accommodation amplitude and ametropia correction by varying refractive index in Phaco-Ersatz.

Phaco-Ersatz is a surgical procedure for restoring accommodation in which the presbyopic crystalline lens is replaced by a flexible polymer gel in the lens capsule. We assessed the feasibility of simultaneously correcting ametropia while restoring accommodation using Phaco-Ersatz by utilizing polymer gel of the appropriate refractive index. Computation results using paraxial equations and ray tracing on two model eyes indicate that although this approach might be feasible for the hypermetrope, its usefulness for correcting myopia is limited, principally due to significant reductions in the resultant amplitude of accommodation.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

The effects of six months of contact lens wear on the tear film, ocular surfaces, and symptoms of presbyopes.

PURPOSE: To assess the tear film, ocular surfaces, and symptoms of ocular discomfort in a presbyopic population before and after contact lens wear. METHODS: A total of 150 presbyopes (49% were previous soft contact lens wearers) participated in a clinical trial in which they wore either monovision (single vision Acuvue lenses) or Acuvue Bifocal contact lenses. Clinical measurements of tear film, biomicroscopy, and corneal sensitivity as well as subjective ratings using the Dry Eye Questionnaire were collected at the initial visit and repeated after 6 months. Comparisons were made between age groups (40 to 51 years and 52 to 71 years) and genders before and after contact lens wear. Associations between objective and subjective tests were sought. RESULTS: After 6 months of contact lens wear, clinical signs had worsened by less than one-half of a grade, and tear break up time (TBUT) worsened by 3 s. Only TBUT was lower for the older age group. Females had less bulbar hyperemia, more sensitive eyes, more lissamine green staining, and lower TBUT and phenol red thread measurements (all p < 0.04). Twenty-eight percent experienced dryness before contact lens wear, but this figure increased to 68% when wearing contact lenses. There were no age differences, but almost twice as many females as males reported dryness. Reporting symptoms of dryness was associated with gender, corneal sensitivity, and type of corneal staining. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide a representation of the ocular surface condition and symptoms of ocular discomfort in the middle-aged population and seem similar to reports of younger populations. Wearing contact lenses seems to influence dry eye symptoms more than age or gender. Therefore, presbyopes should not be excluded from consideration for contact lens fitting.

Adult↗

Monovision: a review of the scientific literature.

We reviewed the scientific literature on monovision to compare the visual performance of monovision patients with that of others wearing more traditional prescriptions. We found that visual performance of monovision patients was comparable to that of control patients wearing a balanced binocular correction, provided that reading adds were not greater than about +2.5 D, that illumination was photopic, and that stimuli were presented at supra-threshold levels. Under these conditions, monovision patients were satisfied with their perceptual experience and performed within 2 to 6% of balanced binocular control patients on a range of occupational tasks. It is noteworthy that monovision patients had relatively more difficulty with acuity-based tasks than with tasks demanding good depth perception. With reading adds over +2.5 D, at low levels of illumination, or with near-threshold level stimuli, visual performance of monovision patients was reduced compared with controls. Subjectively, under low levels of illumination, monovision patients experienced problems with glare and halos around point sources of light.

Contact Lenses↗

Assessing visual performance with progressive addition lenses.

PURPOSE: As a result of lens design limitations, progressive addition lenses (PAL's) present a limited field of view for tasks at intermediate distances, such as with computers. To assess whether this limitation results in diminished visual performance, PAL's were compared with single-vision lenses in four different types of reading tasks in a computer workplace environment. METHODS: Adult subjects performed four computer-based reading tasks using both single-vision lenses and PAL's at an intermediate distance of 64 cm. RESULTS: Single-vision lenses performed significantly better than PAL's in one task, with a trend for better performance in another task. There was no difference in performance for the remaining two tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Visual performance tests that involved stimuli subtending the widest visual angles and demanded more fixational shifts were more sensitive in discerning performance differences between the lens designs. In general, PAL's showed marginally diminished performance compared with single-vision lenses, presumably due to their restricted intermediate channel.

Adult↗

Predicting and assessing visual performance with multizone bifocal contact lenses.

PURPOSE: To investigate how bifocal contact lenses, when combined with the aberrations of the eye, will affect visual performance. Also, to investigate the relationship between the patient's predicted and actual visual benefit with bifocal contact lenses. METHODS: The monochromatic aberrations of 16 subjects were measured and used to simulate visual quality with three bifocal contact lens designs. Actual and computed visual benefit was compared for an Acuvue bifocal contact lens in 5 of the 16 subjects. RESULTS: Subjects were predicted to have either a bifocal response or an increase in depth of focus for all lens designs. Our subjects were predicted to have a decrease in visual benefit for distance viewing and a gain in visual benefit at near compared with not wearing a contact lens. We found a statistically significant association between our subjects' predicted and actual visual benefit with the Acuvue Bifocal contact lens (r = 0.685, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Bifocal contact lens designs, when combined with the aberrations of the eye, will not always provide bifocal vision. Visual quality with a bifocal contact lens can be predicted based on a patient's ocular aberrations.

Adult↗

Contact lenses and collagen shields.

Contact lenses may change the topography of the eye of asymptomatic patients. Complications continue to occur requiring extreme attention to be paid to fitting techniques, care instructions, and follow-up. All physicians must be alert to complications. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential. The pediatric aphakic patient and the presbyopic contact lens wearer present a challenge. The contact lens fitter must understand the way these lenses function to fit patients more successfully. Collagen shields may be of some benefit in cataract surgery and symblepharon, but may exacerbate the effects of alkali burns on the eye.

Collagen↗

Accommodative intraocular lenses: current status.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The possibility of using a monofocal IOL with accommodative ability allows refractive cataract surgery with a clearly decreased potential of photic phenomena. Three IOLs of different designs and materials have demonstrated accommodative ability, but the degree of accommodative amplitude has been reported to different extents and variabilities. The plate-haptic CrystaLens has a hinged design that might permit forward movement of the optic as a result of pressure changes in the vitreous cavity. The 1CU has modified haptics that bend in the bag as the lens capsule contracts, which are supposed to cause anterior displacement of the lens optic. With the dual-optic one-piece Synchrony, springlike haptics separate a high-plus anterior lens from a posterior minus lens. With accommodative effort, the capsular bag expands and the springs express kinetic energy, which might allow the optics to separate as the anterior lens moves forward. RECENT FINDINGS: This article seeks to clarify and distinguish the concepts of true accommodation and pseudo accommodation. Current designs of accommodative IOLs are supposed to work by the focus-shift principle to allow true pseudophakic accommodation. Studies that biometrically assessed optic shift found no or only low amplitudes of forward movement. The amount of forward movement, if present, was highly variable between patients. To date, most studies present psychophysical data for the proof of concept, which alone seems insufficient. Capsule bag performance and posterior capsule opacification with accommodative IOLs seem worse than those with standard intraocular lenses. SUMMARY: The potential clinical benefits of accommodative IOL technology for both cataract patients and refractive patients may place accommodative IOLs in a competitive position with multifocal IOL technology.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

Objective assessment of aberrations induced by multifocal contact lenses in vivo.

PURPOSE: This study examined the effects of a soft multifocal progressive contact lens on individual Zernike coefficients describing the aberrations of the eye. METHODS: Ocular wavefront aberrations (OWA) of 10 subjects not wearing contact lenses were quantified using a Shack-Hartmann aberrometer and were repeated after lens insertion (two lenses,+2 diopters [D], and -2D distance power, order of insertion was randomized). All data were captured and stored on computer. Each coefficient of the Zernike polynomials representing, coma, spherical aberration (SA), and the fifth-order aberrations were evaluated for each OWA. Pupil size was monitored using an infrared device. RESULTS: After subjecting the data to various permutations, the following relationships and chief findings were detected: (1) Comparing coefficients with and without lenses, significant correlations for coma (Z(1)3 [rho,theta], P=0.0056; -2D and P=0.0399, +2D); SA (Z(0)4 [rho,theta], P=0.0006; -2D; and P=0.0061,+2D). Fifth-order aberration (Z(-1)5 [rho,theta], P= 0.0029,+2D). (2) With the -2D lens, the average root-mean-square (RMS) value for the SA coefficient Z(4)4 (rho,theta) and fifth-order Z(-3)5 (rho,theta) increased (P=0.045 and 0.0392, respectively). (3) With the +2D lens, the average RMS value for fifth-order coefficient Z(1)5(rho,theta) increased (P=0.0278). (4) Coma (Z(1)3 [rho,theta] coefficient) correlated with pupil size (P<0.05). Initial mean (+/-SD) pupil size (mm) was 3.05 (0.499), and this did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Z(1)3(rho,theta) and Z(0)4(rho,theta) coefficients may be useful objective markers of success or failure for such contact lenses. The -2D lens had a more predictable effect on SA compared with the +2D lens design. The opposite occurs when considering the effects on the higher fifth-order order aberrations.

Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic↗

Surgical monovision and monovision reversal in LASIK.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the success of surgical monovision in presbyopic patients. METHODS: A university refractive surgery center retrospective chart review of 82 patients who elected to undergo surgical monovision with laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) between January 2000 and January 2003 was conducted. Specific factors included for analysis included preoperative and postoperative defocus spherical equivalent, whether the patient underwent enhancements, whether the patient underwent a preoperative monovision trial with contact lens, and whether the patient underwent monovision reversal. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients who underwent LASIK for monovision were analyzed. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent in the distance-corrected eye was -4.07 (standard deviation (SD), 2.49); for the eye corrected for near vision, mean preoperative spherical equivalent was -4.10 (SD, 2.56). Postoperative spherical equivalent in the distance eyes was -0.01 (SD, 0.38) and in the near eyes -1.24 (SD, 0.91). There were 6 enhancements in the near eyes (7%) and 17 enhancements in the distance vision eyes (21%). This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.007). Thirty patients underwent a contact lens trial of monovision before LASIK, and none of those patients elected monovision reversal. There were 52 patients who did not undergo a contact lens monovision trial before LASIK monovision, and 2 of these patients underwent monovision reversal. Monovision success in this population was 97.6%. CONCLUSION: Surgical monovision can help presbyopic patients achieve their goal of reduced dependence on spectacles. A trial of monovision contact lenses or spectacles may be important in helping surgeons select patients for successful surgical monovision.

Adult↗

A light adjustable lens with injectable optics.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Technology exists today that could permit refractive precision unheard of at the present time plus the correction of higher-order aberrations and restoration of accommodation in presbyopic adults. RECENT FINDINGS: With the light adjustable lens, after surgery, the shape of the lens can be customized to treat spherical, cylindrical and other higher-order aberrations. The posterior surface of the lens can be adjusted to create both refractive multifocality and diffractive bifocality. It can be made out of a variety of materials, some of which can be injected into the capsule, filling it, thus replicating the original shape of a crystalline lens. While the current technique of bag filling does permit the less viscous materials to leak out of the bag this is a solvable problem. For example, a disc can fill an ordinary-sized capsulorrhexis opening, allowing removal of the cataract using standard techniques and filling behind this disc. Also the material, once injected, could be polymerized. Posterior capsule opacification is also potentially solvable with devices that completely destroy lens epithelial cells or through a polymerization process of the new lens material in which the reaction destroys the capsular cells and actually binds to the capsule. SUMMARY: It is apparent that light adjustable lenses plus injectable technology, and multifocality can produce precise refractive correction and, hopefully, the type of accommodative range that we take for granted when we are young. Combining these technologies with a lens material that behaves like a crystalline lens of a 25 year old could precisely return near and distance vision to older adults.

Accommodation, Ocular↗