SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Laparoscopes”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 667 records · Page 37Linked to original sources

PubMed2003

Comparison of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy in a pediatric series.

PURPOSE: Recent advances in laparoscopic surgery as well as increasing experience with these techniques have led to the selection of laparoscopic surgery for many urological procedures. A lesser number of pediatric laparoscopic surgical studies have been reported. Few pediatric comparative laparoscopic versus open surgical procedure studies have been published. We compared 2 groups of similar pediatric patients who underwent partial nephrectomy via the laparoscopic or open technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 22 consecutive partial nephrectomies were performed in pediatric patients 3 months to 15 years old. Of these procedures 11 chosen according to surgeon preference were performed laparoscopically and 11 were done by the open technique. Clinical data were obtained by chart review and compared retrospectively in the 2 groups. Demographic data, operative time and blood loss, the perioperative complication rate, hospital stay and costs, postoperative analgesic use and followup findings were compared. RESULTS: Mean operative time in the laparoscopic and open groups was 200.4 and 113.5 minutes, respectively (p <0.0005). Blood loss was less than 50 cc in all patients. In the laparoscopic and open groups mean hospital stay was 25.5 and 32.6 hours (p = 0.068), and mean cost was $6,125 and $4,244 (p = 0.016), respectively. Patients in the laparoscopic group required fewer doses of analgesics than those who underwent open surgery (mean 10.9 versus 21, p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that increased operative time and costs are disadvantages of pediatric laparoscopic nephrectomy compared with open techniques. Conversely decreased hospital stay, lower analgesic requirements and cosmesis support the use of laparoscopy for pediatric partial nephrectomy. These differences must be considered when deciding which technique is best for overall patient care.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Clinical skills acquisition for hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: The learning curve associated with laparoscopic surgery may be associated with higher patient risk, and in the setting of kidney donation such risk may be unacceptable. We characterize the learning curve for hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in the context of a urology training program, and establish a case volume threshold after which improvements in laparoscopic skill can be demonstrated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 245 consecutive laparoscopic cases, including 111 donor nephrectomies, performed in 2 (1/2) years to characterize various measures of experience. Documentation of resident involvement in each case was made by a single surgeon and collected prospectively. Outcomes assessed included operative time, blood loss and intraoperative complications. RESULTS: Of the 111 hand-assisted donor nephrectomies the resident was surgeon in 47%. Operative time proved a reliable and sensitive measure of surgeon experience. Increasing laparoscopic experience, as measured by several parameters, was associated with decreasing operative time (each p <0.02). Measurable improvements in laparoscopic skill were realized after participating in 13 (p = 0.007) or serving as surgeon in as few as 6 (p = 0.02) hand-assisted donor nephrectomies. Conversion (2%) and intraoperative complication rates (3%) were low. CONCLUSIONS: Skills for hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy can be safely taught in the context of a urology training program independent of resident training level. We documented measurable improvements in laparoscopic skill as gauged by operative time. Our findings provide a basis by which expectations can be set for laparoscopic skill acquisition in the context of a residency program and for the laparoscopically naïve surgeon.

Clinical Competence↗

PubMed2006

Three-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze long-term weight loss, changes in comorbidities and quality of life, and late complications after laparoscopic and open gastric bypass. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Early results from our prospective randomized trial comparing the outcome of laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass demonstrated less postoperative pain, shorter length of hospital stay, fewer wound-related complications, and faster convalescence for patients who underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass. METHODS: Between May 1999 and March 2001, 155 morbidly obese patients were enrolled in this prospective trial, in which 79 patients were randomized to laparoscopic gastric bypass and 76 to open gastric bypass. Two patients in the laparoscopic group required conversion to open surgery; their data were analyzed within the laparoscopic group on an intention-to-treat basis. The 2 groups were well matched for body mass index, age, and gender. Outcome evaluation included weight loss, changes in comorbidities and quality of life, and late complications. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 39+/-8 months. There were no significant differences in the percent of excess body weight loss between the 2 groups at the 3-year follow-up (77% for laparoscopic versus 67% for open). The rate of improvement or resolution of comorbidities was similar between groups. Improvement in quality of life, measured by the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire, was observed in both groups without significant differences between groups. Late complications were similar between groups except for the rate of incisional hernia, which was significantly greater after open gastric bypass (39% versus 5%, P<0.01), and the rate of cholecystectomy, which was greater after laparoscopic gastric bypass (28% versus 5%, P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized trial with a 3-year follow-up, we found that laparoscopic gastric bypass was equally effective as open gastric bypass with respect to weight loss and improvement in comorbidities and quality of life. A major advantage at long-term follow-up for patients who underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass was the reduction in the rate of incisional hernia.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Comparative experience of a simple technique for laparoscopic chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheter placement.

BACKGROUND: Chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is now an established technique for renal dialysis. Patients with renal failure cope poorly with major surgery and it is vital that the dialysis catheter tip is sited accurately in the pelvis if long-term catheter function is to be achieved. Laparoscopic placement of CAPD catheters may have potential advantages for renal patients by avoiding the morbidity of a laparotomy. METHODS: A retrospective audit was performed of all CAPD catheters inserted at the John Hunter Hospital over a 2-year period. Results of laparoscopically inserted catheters and those placed at laparotomy were compared. RESULTS: Sixty catheters were inserted, 30 laparoscopically and 30 at laparotomy. The mean operative time was 41 min in the laparoscopic patients and 57 min in the laparotomy patients (P = 0.0001). The mean total dose of narcotic administered postoperatively was significantly less in the laparoscopic group (5 mg vs 65 mg, P = 0.00002). There were three minor peri-operative complications in the laparoscopic group and seven peri-operative complications in the laparotomy group, three required reoperation and one resulted in the patient's death. There were no significant differences in the incidence of exit-site infection, catheter blockage, peritonitis, and overall catheter survival, although the laparoscopically placed catheters had been followed up for a shorter period (10 vs 16 months). CONCLUSIONS: This laparoscopic technique is safe and effective. Postoperative pain was less than for open placement. Laparoscopically placed catheters had a low incidence of peri-operative complications. Medium-term patency is similar to conventionally placed catheters. This procedure requires no additional equipment to that available for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and takes less time than the open operation.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Laparoscopic colopexy in horses.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a technique for laparoscopic colopexy in horses. STUDY DESIGN: Description of a technique to perform laparoscopic colopexy in horses. ANIMALS: Six healthy adult horses between 3 and 23 years of age and weighing between 440 and 636 kg. METHODS: Horses were positioned in dorsal recumbency, and the abdomen was insufflated to an intraabdominal pressure of 15 mm Hg. A laparoscope portal was placed at the umbilicus, and instrument portals were placed cranial to the laparoscope and lateral to midline. The lateral taenia of the left ventral colon was laparoscopically identified and retracted with Babcock forceps to the peritoneal surface and sutured with two strands of size 2 monofilament nylon in a continuous pattern via laparoscopic observation. All horses were euthanatized 90 days after surgery, and the colopexy adhesion was examined histologically. RESULTS: Laparoscopic colopexy was successful in all six horses. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Initial abdominal insufflation to 15 mm Hg required an average of 38 L (range 32 to 46 L) of carbon dioxide and 9.8 minutes (range 9 to 11 minutes) to be completed. A total of 132 L of carbon dioxide (range 64 to 196 L) was needed for the entire procedure. The laparoscopic colopexy procedure required 95 minutes (range 60 to 142 minutes) to perform. Laparoscopic colopexy resulted in a firm, fibrous adhesion of the colon to the abdominal tunic. Microscopically the colopexy adhesion was mature fibrous tissue with no evidence of inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic colopexy can be successfully performed in horses with minimal abdominal invasion.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Current status of laparoscopic biliary bypass in the management of non-resectable peri-ampullary cancer.

BACKGROUND: In patients with non-resectable peri-ampullary cancer, optimization of quality of life is an important goal. Although endoscopic palliation is widely used, the proponents of laparoscopic biliary bypass claim that this procedure alters management towards surgery. However, the evidence base for selection of laparoscopic bypass is limited and the aim of this report is to scrutinize the available evidence in order to assess the current role of this procedure. METHODS: A computerised literature search was made of the Medline database for the period from January 1966 to December 2004. Searches identified 12 reports of laparoscopic palliation for peri-ampullary cancer. These reports were retrieved and data analysed in the following categories: type of bypass; combination with other procedures; complication and outcome. RESULTS: Laparoscopic cholecystoenterostomy is the commonest form of laparoscopic biliary bypass practiced. Of the 52 reported cases undergoing laparoscopic biliary bypass, 40 underwent laparoscopic cholecystojejunostomy, 6 laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy and 6 underwent laparoscopic hepaticoje- junostomy. CONCLUSION: Current evidence does not justify the incorporation of laparoscopic biliary bypass techniques into contemporary evidence-based management algorithms for patients with non-resectable periampullary cancer.

Ampulla of Vater↗

PubMed2005

Efficacy of novel robotic camera vs a standard laparoscopic camera.

To improve visualization during minimal access surgery, a novel robotic camera has been developed. The prototype camera is totally insertable, has 5 degrees of freedom, and is remotely controlled. This study compared the performance of laparoscopic surgeons using both a laparoscope and the robotic camera. The MISTELS (McGill Inanimate System for the Training and Evaluation of Laparoscopic Skill) tasks were used to test six laparoscopic fellows and attending surgeons. Half the surgeons used the laparoscope first and half used the robotic camera first. Total scores from the MISTELS sessions in which the laparoscope was used were compared with the sessions in which the robotic camera was used and then analyzed with a paired t test (P < .05 was considered significant). All six surgeons tested showed no significant difference in their MISTELS task performance on the robotic camera compared with the standard laparoscopic camera. The mean MISTELS score of 963 for all subjects who used a laparoscope and camera was not significantly different than the mean score of 904 for the robotic camera (P = .17). This new robotic camera prototype allows for equivalent performance on a validated laparoscopic assessment tool when compared with performance using a standard laparoscope.

Equipment Design↗

PubMed2001

Laparoscopic and open surgery for pheochromocytoma.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is a promising alternative to open surgery although concerns exist in regard to laparoscopic treatment of pheocromocytoma. This report compares the outcome of laparoscopic and conventional (open) resection for pheocromocytoma particular in regard to intraoperative hemodynamic stability and postoperative patient comfort. METHODS: Seven patients laparoscopically treated (1997-2000) and nine patients treated by open resection (1990-1996) at the National Hospital (Rikshospitalet), Oslo. Peroperative hemodynamic stability including need of vasoactive drugs was studied. Postoperative analgesic medication, complications and hospital stay were recorded. RESULTS: No laparoscopic resections were converted to open procedure. Patients laparoscopically treated had fewer hypertensive episodes (median 1 vs. 2) and less need of vasoactive drugs peroperatively than patients conventionally operated. There was no difference in operative time between the two groups (median 110 min vs. 125 min for adrenal pheochromocytoma and 235 vs. 210 min for paraganglioma). Postoperative need of analgesic medication (1 vs. 9 patients) and hospital stay (median 3 vs. 6 days) were significantly reduced in patients laparoscopically operated compared to patients treated by the open technique. CONCLUSION: Surgery for pheochromocytoma can be performed laparoscopically with a safety comparable to open resection. However, improved hemodynamic stability peroperatively and less need of postoperative analgesics favour the laparoscopic approach. In experienced hands the laparoscopic technique is concluded to be the method of choice also for pheocromocytoma.

Adrenal Gland Neoplasms↗

PubMed2003

Comparative evaluation of immune response after laparoscopical and open total mesorectal excisions with anal sphincter preservation in patients with rectal cancer.

AIM: The study of immune response of open versus laparoscopical total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation in patients with rectal cancer has not been reported yet. The dissected retroperitoneal area that contacts directly with carbon dioxide is extensive in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation surgery. It is important to clarify whether the immune response of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation (LTME with ASP) in patients with rectal cancer is suppressed more severely than that of open surgery (OTME with ASP). This study was designed to compare the immune functions after laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for rectal cancer. METHODS: This study involved 45 patients undergoing laparoscopic (n=20) and open (n=25) total mesorectal excisions with anal sphincter preservation for rectal cancer. Serum interleukin-2 (IL-2), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) were assayed preoperatively and on days 1 and 5 postoperatively. CD3+ and CD56+ T lymphocyte count, CD3- and CD56+ natural killer cell (NK) count and immunoglobulin (IgG/IgM/IgA) were assayed preoperatively and on day 5 postoperatively. The numbers of CD3+ and CD56+ T lymphocytes and CD3- and CD56+ NK cells were counted using flow cytometry. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used for IL-2, IL-6 and TNFalpha determination. And IgG, IgM, and IgA were assayed using immunonephelometry. RESULTS: The demographic data of the two groups had no difference. The preoperative levels of CD3+ and CD56+ T lymphocyte count, CD3- and CD56+ NK count, serum IgG, IgM, IgA, IL-2, IL-6 and TNFalpha also had no significant difference in the two groups (P>0.05). The CD3+ and CD56+ T lymphocyte counts had no obvious changes after surgery in laparoscopic (d=-0.79 +/- 3.83%) and open (d=0.42 +/- 2.09%) groups. The CD3- and CD56+ NK counts were decreased postoperatively in both laparoscopic (d=-7.23 +/- 11.33%) and open (d=-9.21 +/- 13.93%) groups. The differences of the determined values of serum IgG, IgM and IgA on the fifth day after operation subtracted those before operation were -2.56 +/- 2.14 g/L, -252.35 +/- 392.94 mg/L, -506.15 +/- 912.24 mg/L in laparoscopic group, and -1.81 +/- 2.10 g/L, -282.72 +/- 356.75 mg/L, -252.20 +/- 396.28 mg/L in open group, respectively. The levels of IL-2 were decreased after operation in both groups. However, the levels of IL-6 were decreased after laparoscopic surgery (d1=-23.14 +/- 263.97 ng/L and d5=-40.08 +/- 272.03 ng/L), and increased after open surgery (d1=27.38 +/- 129.14 ng/L and d5=21.67 +/- 234.31 ng/L). The TNFalpha levels were not elevated after surgery in both groups. There were no significant differences in the numbers of CD3+ and CD56+ T lymphocytes and CD3- and CD56+ NK cells, the levels of IgG, IgM, IgA, IL-2, IL-6 and TNFalpha between the two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: There are no differences in immune responses between the patients having laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation and those undergone open surgery for rectal cancer.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Reintegration of health services in the Danube area of the Croatian health care system: introduction of laparoscopic surgery in the Vukovar General Hospital].

After six years of occupation, in the second half of 1997 started the reintegration of the Danube region in the Croatian health care system. Introducing of the laparoscopic surgery in Vukovar General Hospital has been presented in this article. A part of the laparoscopic equipment and reusable instruments was a gift of the Croatian Institute for Health Insurance, and some equipment and instruments were bought. Until now, 170,000 HRK has been spent for laparoscopic surgery. The first laparoscopic operations--laparoscopic cholecystectomies in our hospital were performed on June 25, 1998. From October 1, 1998, laparoscopic operations have been regularly done. Until December 24, 1998, laparoscopic cholecystectomies, hernioplasties, appendectomies and diagnostic laparoscopies were performed. The total number of laparoscopically operated patients is 23. We did not have serious intra or postoperative complications. On November 20-21, the 10th postgraduate course on laparoscopic cholecystectomy was organized in our hospital. In a relatively short time and specific circumstances, laparoscopic surgery has become a standard surgical method in Vukovar General Hospital.

Croatia↗

PubMed2000

Prospective, case matched comparison of hand assisted laparoscopic and open surgical live donor nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: The technical difficulty of standard laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has limited its application. Hand assistance, which takes advantage of the incision necessary for organ removal, facilitates laparoscopy without significant impact on patient recovery. We prospectively compared open surgical and hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our first 10 laparoscopic live donor nephrectomies were matched with 40 open donor nephrectomies by gender, age and body mass index. Data were obtained by pain scales, SF-12 survey instruments, questionnaires and chart abstraction. RESULTS: Operative time was longer for the laparoscopic approach (mean 95 versus 215 minutes). However, laparoscopic group patients had a shorter hospital stay compared to those undergoing open surgery (mean 2.9 versus 1.8 days), returned sooner to nonstrenuous activity (mean 19.0 versus 9.9 days) and reported less pain 6 weeks postoperatively (mean 2.3 versus 0.6) (p </=0.03 for all). There were no differences between groups in terms of donor complications, allograft function and ureteral complications. Mean hospital cost was 23% greater in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.005) but global cost, which accounted for estimated loss of income from work during the recovery period, was only 15% greater (p = 0.10). Mean operative time was significantly improved for our second compared to our first 5 laparoscopic group patients (177 versus 254 minutes). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy appears to be a safe and effective alternative to open donor nephrectomy. Indexes of patient recovery suggest patient morbidity similar to that reported following standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and significantly less than after open nephrectomy. Improvement in operative time in the first 10 cases suggests that hand assistance "shortens" the learning curve, which might encourage more surgeons to offer laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[The rationale of laparoscopic treatment in acute appendiceal disease].

Notwithstanding its widely perceived advantages, laparoscopic appendectomy has not yet met with universal acceptance. The aim of the present work was to illustrate retrospectively the results of a case-control study of laparoscopic vs open appendectomy carried out at our institution. From Jan. 1993 to Dec. 1999 a total of 457 patients (M:F = 210:247; mean age 25.2 +/- 15 years) underwent emergency and/or urgent appendectomy. Among them, 254 (55.5%) were operated on laparoscopically, while 203 (44.5%) were treated by conventional surgery The choice of technique depended upon the availability or otherwise of a team expert in minimally invasive surgery. The laparoscopic technique conversion rate was 3.9% and was mainly due to the presence of dense intraabdominal adhesions. The major intraoperative complication rates were 0.39% and 0% in the laparoscopic and laparotomy groups, respectively (P = ns). Major postoperative complications occurred in 2 and 1%, respectively (P = ns). The postoperative mortality rates were 0.4% and 0.5% in the laparoscopy and laparotomy groups, respectively (P = ns). The reoperation rate was 1.1% in the laparoscopic group as against 0% in the open surgery group (P = ns). Minor postoperative complications were observed in 0.8% and 7.5% of patients in the laparoscopy and open surgery groups, respectively (P = 0.001) and consisted mainly of wound infections. Resumption of bowel function was significantly more rapid and the hospital stay significantly shorter in the laparoscopically treated patients. The greater diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopy allowed concurrent diseases to be diagnosed in 9% of laparoscopically treated patients with histologically proven appendicitis as against 1.5% of those treated by conventional surgery (P = 0.001). Similarly, among those patients with no evidence of gross and/or microscopic appendicitis, concurrent diseases were detected in 58.4% of the laparoscopic cases as against only 6% of the laparotomy cases (P = 0.0001). Despite the limitations of a retrospective investigation, on the basis of our experience we believe that laparoscopic appendectomy is as safe and effective as conventional surgery, presents a higher degree of diagnostic accuracy and makes for less trauma and a more rapid postoperative recovery. Such features make its use mandatory in female patients of child-bearing age referred for urgent abdominal and/or pelvic surgery.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2000

Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience.

PURPOSE: The laparoscopic approach for renal cell carcinoma is slowly evolving. We report our experience with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and compare it to a contemporary cohort of patients with renal cell carcinoma who underwent open radical nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1990 to 1999, 32 males and 28 females underwent 61 laparoscopic radical nephrectomies for suspicious renal cell carcinoma. Clinical data from a computerized database were reviewed and compared to a contemporary group of 33 patients who underwent open radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. RESULTS: Patients in the laparoscopic radical nephrectomy group had significantly reduced, estimated blood loss (172 versus 451 ml., p <0.001), hospital stay (3.4 versus 5.2 days, p <0.001), pain medication requirement (28.0 versus 78.3 mg., p <0.001) and quicker return to normal activity than patients in the open radical nephrectomy group (3.6 versus 8.1 weeks, p <0.001). The majority of laparoscopic specimens (65%) were morcellated. Operating time and cost were higher in the laparoscopic than the open nephrectomy group. Average followup was 25 months (range 3 to 73) for the laparoscopic and 27.5 months (range 7 to 90) for the open group. Renal cell carcinoma in 3 patients (8%) recurred in the laparoscopic group versus renal cell carcinoma in 3 (9%) in the open group. When stratified patients with tumors larger than 4 to 10 cm. experienced similar benefits and results as patients with tumors less than or equal to 4 cm. To date there have been no instances of trocar or intraperitoneal seeding in the laparoscopic radical nephrectomy group. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, although technically demanding, is a viable alternative for managing localized renal tumors up to 10 cm. It affords patients with renal tumors an improved postoperative course with less pain and a quicker recovery while providing similar efficacy at 2-year followup for patients with T1 and T2 tumors.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Hand-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with minilaparotomy for distal pancreatic cystadenoma.

Two patients with cystic tumors of the pancreas treated by laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy are presented. The first patient was a 34-year-old woman with a 6-cm cystadenoma of the tail of the pancreas treated with a complete laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. After mobilization of the distal pancreas and spleen, the pancreas was transected proximally together with the splenic artery and vein using an endoscopic linear stapler. The second patient was a 71-year-old woman with a 6-cm cystadenoma of the body of the pancreas, treated by hand-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with minilaparotomy because the tumor was adjacent to the portal vein and celiac axis. Using an upper median minilaparotomy, dissection of the gastrocolic ligament, division of the splenic artery, and transection and closure of the pancreas were performed. Division of the splenic vein and mobilization of the distal pancreas and spleen were performed via a hand-assisted laparoscopic approach. There were no postoperative complications (such as pancreatic fistulas) in either patient, and the postoperative courses were uneventful. The patients returned to normal activity within 1 week after the operation. Complete laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy are preferable to conventional open surgery for benign tumors of the pancreas because of their less-invasive nature. Additionally, in tumors of the body of the pancreas, hand-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy might have the advantages of laparotomy and laparoscopy in terms of handling the splenic artery and vein just below the minilaparotomy site, suggesting an easier and safer procedure than complete laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Therefore, hand-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy can be recommended as a useful alternative to complete laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for selected patients with benign tumors of the body and tail of the pancreas.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery has been used to perform nephrectomies. This report contrasts the efficacy, postoperative morbidity, length of stay, analgesic use, and time to recovery for hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy, to standard laparoscopic and open nephrectomy. The technique for hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy used at two institutions is described. The results from these two institutions are contrasted to results in the literature for standard laparoscopic and open nephrectomy. Standard and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy seem similar in terms of efficacy of surgery, time of surgery, estimated blood loss, length of stay, and time to full recovery. The two laparoscopic techniques seem to show advantage over open surgery in respect to shorter hospital stay, faster full recovery, and less analgesic use. The operative time for the laparoscopic surgeries is longer than the open surgery operating time. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery seems to be equivalent to standard laparoscopy. As urologists around the world are trained in hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy, a more refined look at these early results will be possible.

Humans↗

PubMed2001

The impact of intense laparoscopic skills training on the operative performance of urology residents.

PURPOSE: As laparoscopy has become more commonplace in urology, increased emphasis has been placed on laparoscopic education. We assessed the impact of laparoscopic skills training on the operative performance of urological surgeons inexperienced with laparoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urology residents were prospectively randomized to undergo laparoscopic skills training (6) or no training (6). Baseline assessment of operative performance (scale 0 to 35) during porcine laparoscopic nephrectomy was completed by all subjects. Cumulative time to complete laparoscopic tasks using an inanimate trainer was also recorded. The skills training group then practiced inanimate trainer tasks for 30 minutes daily for 10 days. The 2 groups then repeated the timed inanimate trainer tasks and underwent repeat assessment of the ability to perform porcine laparoscopic nephrectomy. RESULTS: At baseline no statistical difference was noted in laparoscopic experience, inanimate trainer time or overall operative assessment in the 2 groups. In the skills training group mean cumulative time to complete inanimate trainer tasks decreased from 341 to 176 seconds (p = 0.003), while in the control group it decreased from 365 to 301 (p = 0.15). Operative assessment improved from initial to repeat porcine laparoscopic nephrectomy regardless of the trained versus control randomization grouping (22.0 to 27.8, p = 0.0008 and 20.8 to 26.5, p = 0.00007, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In vivo experience enables urological surgeons inexperienced with laparoscopy to improve significantly in all aspects of complex laparoscopic procedures. In this pilot study the magnitude of improvement was independent of additional training in laparoscopic skills. Educational curriculum should include in vivo practice in addition to skills training.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Long-term followup after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy has been shown to be less morbid than traditional open radical nephrectomy. The long-term oncological effectiveness of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy remains to be established. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At 3 centers patients undergoing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy before November 1, 1996 with pathologically confirmed renal cell carcinoma were identified. A representative group of patients undergoing open radical nephrectomy for clinical T1, T2 lesions was also identified. Staging, operative details and postoperative course were reviewed. Followup consisted of review of clinical, laboratory and radiological records. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed. RESULTS: The study included 64 patients treated with laparoscopic and 69 treated with open radical nephrectomy with respective average ages of 60.6 and 61.3 years at surgery. On preoperative imaging open lesions were larger (6.2 cm., range 2.5 to 15) than laparoscopic radical nephrectomy lesions (4.3 cm., range 2 to 10, p <0.001). Pathology reports revealed no difference in specimen weight (425 and 495 gm., p = 0.146) or average Fuhrman grade (1.88 and 1.78, p = 0.476) between laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomy, respectively. Median followup was 54 months (range 0 to 94) for laparoscopic and 69 months (range 8 to 114) for open radical nephrectomy. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log rank comparison revealed 5-year recurrence-free survival of 92% and 91% for laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomy, respectively (p = 0.583). At 5 years cancer specific survival was 98% and 92% (p = 0.124), and nonspecific survival was 81% and 89% (p = 0.260) for laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy confers long-term oncological effectiveness equivalent to traditional open radical nephrectomy.

Carcinoma, Renal Cell↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Results of laparoscopic versus open resections for non-early rectal cancer in patients with a minimum follow-up of four years.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Laparoscopic rectal resection for malignancy is still debated. Concern has been expressed regarding the lack of significant data from larger patient series with longer periods of follow-up. The aims of this study were to compare long-term outcome with a minimum follow-up of four years in unselected patients undergoing either laparoscopic rectal resection or open rectal resection for cancer. METHODOLOGY: From May 1992 to August 1997 all electively admitted patients with rectal cancer were included in a prospective non-randomized study. Written information was submitted to each patient and the location in each group (laparoscopic or open) was related to the patient's choice. The inclusion protocol criteria excluded T1 tumors. All 68 T2-T4 patients underwent preoperative radiotherapy (5.040 cGy), completed with chemotherapy in selected cases (patients below 70 years of age). Long-term results were compared between the two groups. Follow-up time of both groups ranged between 48 and 96 months (mean, 49.4 months). RESULTS: Excluding patients who underwent a palliative resection or conversion to open surgery and deaths not related to cancer, 53 pts (29 laparoscopic rectal resection, 24 open rectal resection) out of 68 are available and are the object of this study. No patient was lost to follow-up. No wound recurrence was observed. The local recurrence rate after laparoscopic rectal resection was 24.1% vs. 25% after open rectal resection (P = 0.799). Distant metastases occurred in 20.7% of patients in the LLR group (laparoscopic rectal resection) vs. 25% in the ORR group (open rectal resection) (P = 0.980). Cumulative survival probability after laparoscopic rectal resection and open rectal resection was 0.690 and 0.625 (P = 0.492), respectively. Cumulative survival probability for Duke's stage A, B and C in the LRR group vs. the ORR group was 1.000 vs. 0.900 (P = 0.585), 0.667 vs. 0.636 (P = 0.496) and 0.429 vs. 0.445 (P = 0.501), respectively. Sixteen laparoscopic rectal resection patients (55.2%) and 12 open rectal resection patients (50%) are presently disease free (P = 0.979). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term results after laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer were comparable to those after conventional resection, with a trend in favor of the laparoscopic approach that does not reach a statistically significant difference, possibly due to the limited size of the sample.

Adult↗