Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Indinavir”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 667 records · Page 37Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Disorders of lipid metabolism in patients with HIV disease treated with antiretroviral agents: frequency, relationship with administered drugs, and role of hypolipidaemic therapy with bezafibrate.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the correlation between antiretroviral treatment and dyslipidaemia in HIV-infected patients, and the role of bezafibrate as a lipid-lowering agent. METHODS: We retrospectively compared serum lipid levels of five groups of 40 patients, each of them treated with either saquinavir hard gel, indinavir, or ritonavir (associated with two nucleoside analogues), or dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) with or without a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), or not treated with antiretrovirals, randomly selected from nearly 1000 HIV-infected patients followed-up for >or= 12 months, while on the relevant therapy. Hypertriglyceridaemia was defined by triglyceride levels >or= 172 mg/dl, and hypercholesterolaemia by cholesterol levels >or= 200 mg/dl. All patients with triglyceridaemia > 300 mg/dl and cholesterolaemia > 220 mg/dl for at least 6 months, and unresponsive to a >or= 3-month diet, started bezafibrate (400 mg/day), and were prospectively followed-up at a <or= 3-month interval, evaluating both efficacy and tolerability of the hypolipidaemic treatment, provided that they did not change their protease inhibitor treatment for reasons other than metabolic abnormalities. RESULTS: Hypertrygliceridaemia occurred in 75 patients out of 200 (37.5%), but was significantly more frequent and severe with ritonavir vs. indinavir (P<0.001), and in subjects given indinavir vs. all remaining patients (either treated or not) (P<0.001), while isolated saquinavir use was associated with higher tri glyceride levels than NRTI-NNRTI treatment alone, or no antiretroviral therapy (P<0.03). Hypercholesterolaemia was found in 27 subjects (13.5%), and a significantly higher frequency and severity was shown in patients treated with indinavir and ritonavir vs. saquinavir, NRTI-NNRTI, and no anti-HIV therapy (P<0.05 to P<0.001). No appreciable difference was found between patients undergoing NRTI-NNRTI and untreated controls, for all evaluated variables. Bezafibrate was administered once daily for 6-18 months to 49 patients with elevated and diet-resistant hyperlipidaemia due to ritonavir or indinavir (27 and 22 subjects, respectively), and reduced triglyceride and cholesterol levels by 35% and 25%, respectively over 6 months, without differences between the underlying protease inhibitor regimen. Thirty-three patients (67.3%) reached a normal triglyceridaemia after 6-9 months, and normal cholesterol levels were obtained in all subjects. Bezafibrate proved safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Careful monitoring of the serum lipid profile is needed during antiretroviral therapy, including protease inhibitors, to identify the need for a diet and/or an hypolipidaemic treatment, and to prevent clinical sequelae related to long-term dyslipidaemia. Specific guidelines for the management of disorders of lipid metabolism in HIV-infected patients are needed.

Bezafibrate↗
PubMed2000

The mechanism of insulin resistance caused by HIV protease inhibitor therapy.

Retroviral protease inhibitors used as therapy for HIV-1 infection have been causally associated with serious metabolic side effects, including peripheral lipodystrophy, hyperlipidemia, insulin resistance, and in some cases, overt type 2 diabetes. The etiology of this characteristic clinical syndrome remains unknown. We demonstrate that the HIV protease inhibitor, indinavir, dramatically inhibits insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in 3T3-L1 adipocytes in a dose-dependent manner (63% inhibition observed with 100 micrometer indinavir). Indinavir treatment did not affect early insulin signaling events or the translocation of intracellular Glut1 or Glut4 glucose transporters to the cell surface. To determine whether indinavir may be directly affecting the intrinsic transport activity of glucose transporters, the Glut1 and Glut4 isoforms were heterologously expressed and analyzed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Indinavir at 100 microm had no effect on Glut1 transport activity in Xenopus oocytes, whereas Glut4 activity was significantly inhibited (45% inhibition). Similar effects on glucose transport were observed for other HIV protease inhibitors. We conclude that HIV protease inhibitors as a class are capable of selectively inhibiting the transport function of Glut4 and that this effect may be responsible for a major iatrogenic complication frequently observed in HIV patients.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed2000

Dynamics of HIV-1 viral load rebound among patients with previous suppression of viral replication.

OBJECTIVE: To model the dynamics of HIV-1 rebound in patients receiving suboptimal therapy after suppression of plasma viremia to < 200 copies/ml by triple combination therapy. DESIGN: Mathematical modeling of data from 23 patients switched to indinavir maintenance therapy after viral replication was suppressed with a combination of indinavir, zidovudine and lamivudine. Modeling of HIV-1 rebound among 24 patients on zidovudine/lamivudine maintenance was also performed for comparison. METHODS: Evaluation of slopes of rebound and of their heterogeneity; calculation of the basic reproductive number (Ro, the number of newly infected cells arising from each productively infected cell); regression analyses for predictors of the slope of rebound. RESULTS: Rebound of plasma HIV RNA followed a sigmoid curve with an initial exponential phase. There was significant heterogeneity in the slopes of rebound for individual patients (P < 0.001). In the indinavir maintenance rebounds, the average initial slope was estimated to be 0.587/day (doubling time 1.2 days). The slopes of rebound in patients on zidovudine/lamivudine maintenance tended to be less steep on average (P = 0.025). Among patients taking indinavir maintenance, the average Ro for the initial rebound of viremia was 4.3; in multivariate regressions, the slope of rebound was steeper during early rebound and in patients with higher viral load at the start of triple therapy or a higher CD4 cell count when indinavir monotherapy was initiated. The slope was less steep in patients with a greater increase in the number of CD4 cells during triple therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of viral load increase among patients with viral rebound while receiving less than triple therapy are similar to those reported in patients interrupting therapy. Variability among patients may depend on viral fitness, target cell availability and extent of immune reconstitution.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Assessment of active transport of HIV protease inhibitors in various cell lines and the in vitro blood--brain barrier.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the involvement of P-glycoprotein (Pgp) and the multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) on the active transport of the HIV protease inhibitors amprenavir, ritonavir and indinavir. METHODS: The transport behaviour of ritonavir, indinavir and amprenavir in the presence and absence of Pgp modulators and probenecid was investigated in an in vitro blood--brain barrier (BBB) co-culture model and in monolayers of LLC-PK1, LLC-PK1:MDR1, LLC-PK1:MRP1 and Caco-2 cells. RESULTS: All three HIV protease inhibitors showed polarized transport in the BBB model, LLC-PK1:MDR1 and Caco-2 cell line. The Pgp modulators SDZ-PSC 833, verapamil and LY 335979 inhibited polarized transport, although their potency was dependent on both the cell model and the HIV protease inhibitor used. Ritonavir and indinavir also showed polarized transport in the LLC-PK1 and LLC-PK1:MRP1 cell line, which could be inhibited by probenecid. HIV protease inhibitors were not able to inhibit competitively polarized transport of other HIV protease inhibitors in the LLC-PK1:MDR1 cell line. CONCLUSIONS: Amprenavir, ritonavir and indinavir are mainly actively transported by Pgp, while MRP also plays a role in the transport of ritonavir and indinavir. This indicates that inhibition of Pgp could be useful therapeutically to increase HIV protease inhibitor concentrations in the brain and in other tissues and cells expressing Pgp. The HIV protease inhibitors were not able to inhibit Pgp-mediated efflux when given simultaneously, suggesting that simultaneous administration of these drugs will not increase the concentration of antiretroviral drugs in the brain.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗
PubMed2005

In vitro inhibition of UDP glucuronosyltransferases by atazanavir and other HIV protease inhibitors and the relationship of this property to in vivo bilirubin glucuronidation.

Several human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors, including atazanavir, indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir, were tested for their potential to inhibit uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) activity. Experiments were performed with human cDNA-expressed enzymes (UGT1A1, 1A3, 1A4, 1A6, 1A9, and 2B7) as well as human liver microsomes. All of the protease inhibitors tested were inhibitors of UGT1A1, UGT1A3, and UGT1A4 with IC(50) values that ranged from 2 to 87 microM. The IC50 values found for all compounds for UGT1A6, 1A9, and 2B7 were >100 microM. The inhibition (IC50) of UGT1A1 was similar when tested against the human cDNA-expressed enzyme or human liver microsomes for atazanavir, indinavir, and saquinavir (2.4, 87, and 7.3 microM versus 2.5, 68, and 5.0 microM, respectively). By analysis of the double-reciprocal plots of bilirubin glucuronidation activities at different bilirubin concentrations in the presence of fixed concentrations of inhibitors, the UGT1A1 inhibition by atazanavir and indinavir was demonstrated to follow a linear mixed-type inhibition mechanism (Ki = 1.9 and 47.9 microM, respectively). These results suggest that a direct inhibition of UGT1A1-mediated bilirubin glucuronidation may provide a mechanism for the reversible hyperbilirubinemia associated with administration of atazanavir as well as indinavir. In vitro-in vivo scaling with [I]/Ki predicts that atazanavir and indinavir are more likely to induce hyperbilirubinemia than other HIV protease inhibitors studied when a free Cmax drug concentration was used. Our current study provides a unique example of in vitro-in vivo correlation for an endogenous UGT-mediated metabolic pathway.

Atazanavir Sulfate↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Differences in the detection of three HIV-1 protease inhibitors in non-blood compartments: clinical correlations.

PURPOSE: To study the presence of three HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PIs) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), semen, and lymph nodes and to assess the correlations with residual viral replication in these compartments. METHOD: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of sanctuary samples from 41 HIV-infected patients on stable highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens containing indinavir, nelfinavir, or lopinavir combined with ritonavir (lopinavir/r) and a longitudinal analysis of PI levels and HIV-1 RNA in plasma and CSF of 6 additional patients on nelfinavir or lopinavir/r monotherapy (3 cases each). Plasma, CSF, semen, and a lymph node (LN) biopsy were taken on the same day. Samples were assayed for PI concentrations, HIV-1 RNA levels, and, when detectable, sequencing of the reverse transcriptase and protease genes on seminal viral RNA. RESULTS: In the cross-sectional analysis, the CSF/plasma ratio was 0.14 for indinavir. Nelfinavir and lopinavir/r were consistently undetectable in CSF. The semen/plasma ratio was 1.9 for indinavir, 0.07 for nelfinavir, and 0.07 for lopinavir. The LN/plasma ratio was 2.07 for indinavir, 0.58 for nelfinavir, 0.21 for lopinavir, and 0.64 for ritonavir. Plasma HIV-1 RNA was <50 copies/mL in 28 patients and was detectable in 13 patients. HIV-1 RNA was <50 copies/mL in CSF samples when plasma RNA was undetectable. Three semen samples taken from patients with viremia <50 copies/mL showed detectable HIV-1 RNA with resistance mutations. HIV-1 RNA was detectable in all LNs, with no differences in patients on indinavir compared with those on nelfinavir or lopinavir/r. In the longitudinal analysis, HIV-1 RNA decreased in the plasma of the 6 patients on nelfinavir or lopinavir/r monotherapy, although CSF HIV-1 RNA decreased only in patients on lopinavir/r. CONCLUSION: Major differences exist between PIs in terms of detection in non-blood compartments. An undetectable PI level in CSF does not rule out drug activity in the brain for lopinavir/r, although this is not the case for nelfinavir. Poor penetration of PIs in semen in some patients can lead to double nucleoside therapy in this compartment. The persistence of HIV-1 RNA in LNs does not seem to be related to PI levels in this tissue.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Extrapyramidal symptoms with ritonavir/indinavir plus risperidone.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of suspected extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) in a patient initiated on ritonavir and indinavir while taking risperidone for a tic disorder. CASE SUMMARY: A 35-year-old white man with AIDS received risperidone 2 mg twice daily for treatment of a Tourette's-like tic disorder. Ritonavir and indinavir were initiated, and 1 week later, he experienced significantly impaired swallowing, speaking, and breathing, and worsening of his existing tremors. Ritonavir and indinavir were discontinued. On the same day, the patient increased the risperidone dosage to 3 mg twice daily. Symptoms continued to worsen over the next 3 days. All investigations and laboratory parameters were unremarkable, and vital signs were stable. Risperidone was discontinued and clonazepam initiated. Three days later, the patient's symptoms were significantly improved. DISCUSSION: The symptoms described herein are consistent with neuroleptic-induced acute dystonia and potentially neuroleptic-induced parkinsonism. We believe this adverse effect occurred as a result of a drug interaction between ritonavir/indinavir and risperidone. Based on the pharmacokinetics of these medications, we hypothesize that inhibition of CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 by ritonavir and indinavir may have resulted in an accumulation of the active moiety of risperidone, which may explain the occurrence of EPS in this patient. CONCLUSIONS: This is the second published case report describing a suspected drug interaction with ritonavir, indinavir, and risperidone. Caution is warranted when risperidone is prescribed with ritonavir/indinavir, and possibly with other antiretrovirals that inhibit the same pathways.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed2003

[Observational study on the efficacy of the application of two classical regimens of triple antiretroviral therapy].

BACKGROUND: To compare the temporal evolution of viral load and CD4 parameters in two cohorts of HIV infected patients enrolled in classical triple antiretroviral regimens. METHODS: Retrospective, observational, descriptive study of the proportions of patients reaching undetectable levels of viral load (VL) as well as the time necessary to get it. The two cohorts were as follows: 91 HIV patients on triple therapy with zidovudine plus lamivudine and indinavir (cohort A) versus 80 HIV patients with Stavudine plus Didanosine and Indinavir (cohort B). RESULTS: The evolution of the patients in terms of percentages who reach undetectable VL was similar in the two therapeutic cohorts (75.8%for cohort A vs 73.8% for cohort B) along the duration of the study (four years). However, the mean time period needed to reach undetectable VL was different, 209 days (IC 95% 175-243 days) for patients in zidovudine plus lamivudine and indinavir and 330 days (IC 95% 263-396 days) for stavudine plus didanosine and indinavir regimen. The immunological status observed in the patients when reaching his first undetectable VL was significantly different. The proportion of patients with CD4 cells counts >200/mm3 in cohort A was 83.1% while for patients from cohort B was 65.4% (p=0.032). CONCLUSIONS: This observational study from clinical settings seems demonstrate similar efficacy to reach undetectable VL with both classical triple antiretroviral therapies evaluated but a shorter delay of time to reach that virological situation for zidovudine plus lamivudine and indinavir regimen is reported.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed1999

Analysis of HIV cross-resistance to protease inhibitors using a rapid single-cycle recombinant virus assay for patients failing on combination therapies.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the patterns of HIV phenotypic cross-resistance to protease inhibitors (PI) in patients experiencing viral load rebound on combination therapy including a PI. METHODS: Phenotypic analysis of sensitivity to indinavir, nelfinavir, saquinavir, ritonavir and amprenavir was carried out using a single-cycle recombinant virus assay. Viral protease was sequenced by automated dideoxynucleotide chain termination. RESULTS: Of the 108 patients studied, 68 had received indinavir, 50 ritonavir, 25 saquinavir and eight nelfinavir. The majority (71%) had received only one PI. The incidence of cross-resistance between indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir and saquinavir was high (60-90%). Cross-resistance to amprenavir was less frequent (37-40%). However there was some correlation between levels of sensitivity to amprenavir and indinavir (r2 = 0.34; P < 0.01). Conversely, the correlation between levels of sensitivity to indinavir and saquinavir was poor (r2 = 0.25), particularly for patients who had not received saquinavir. The degree of cross-resistance correlated with the level of resistance and with the total number of mutations in the protease gene (P < 0.05, chi square test) but could not be significantly correlated to any one particular mutation or combination of mutations. Mutation 184V was significantly associated with cross-resistance to amprenavir, with no mutations at codon 50 observed, while mutations associated with cross-resistance to saquinavir differed according to the treatment received. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that, although the total number of protease mutations correlates with the degree of cross-resistance, the specific mechanisms accounting for primary resistance and for cross-resistance may be different.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed2006

Antiretrovirals induce direct endothelial dysfunction in vivo.

HIV-associated cardiovascular diseases have been widely described, but clinical studies aimed at establishing cause-effect relationships between HIV-associated cardiovascular disease and either the HIV infection or antiretroviral therapy have been problematic. Endothelial dysfunction is a sensitive marker and early event in atherosclerosis, and many have suggested that protease inhibitors promote endothelial dysfunction indirectly by inducing elevations in circulating lipids. To determine whether nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and/or protease inhibitors induce endothelial dysfunction, and to test whether this effect is dependent upon drug-mediated alteration in plasma lipid concentrations, we treated male Sprague-Dawley rats with pharmacological doses of azidothymidine (AZT), indinavir, or AZT plus indinavir through their drinking water for 1 month and assessed endothelial function in aortic rings using an isometric force measurement. Circulating levels of plasma lipids and endothelin-1, a marker for endothelial injury and/or dysfunction, were also determined. We found that AZT and AZT plus indinavir treatments dramatically reduced endothelium-dependent vessel relaxation. However, AZT treatment did not significantly alter plasma levels of cholesterol or triglyceride. In addition, plasma endothelin-1 levels were elevated in rats treated with AZT plus indinavir. Indinavir treatment alone increased plasma cholesterol levels but had no effect on endothelial function. These findings suggest that in addition to modulating plasma lipid levels, antiretrovirals, particularly AZT and perhaps other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, may have direct effects on the vascular endothelium. Together with other increased risk factors for atherosclerosis in HIV patients, AZT-induced endothelial dysfunction may contribute to the cardiovascular diseases associated with HIV antiretroviral therapy.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Efavirenz: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in HIV infection.

Efavirenz is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) used in the treatment of patients with HIV infection. Both US and British treatment guidelines for HIV infection recommend NNRTI- or protease inhibitor-based combinations [i.e. with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs)] as first-line treatmentoptions in the management of HIV disease. Results of a pivotal randomised study (DMP 266-006) comparing efavirenz- versus indinavir-based triple combination therapy in patients with HIV infection (the majority of whom were antiretroviral therapy-naive) showed the efavirenz-based regimen was better tolerated and had greater success in achieving reductions in viral load below the limit of detection. These and other clinical data were incorporated into economic models in 2 analyses, one conducted in the US and the other in Canada. The US analysis examined long term clinical and economic outcomes predicted on the basis of response (viral load and CD4+ cell counts), tolerability and willingness to adhere to therapy. The efavirenz-based regimen was the dominant treatment strategy as it was predicted to improve survival and reduce direct medical costs in the US healthcare system. Compared with the indinavir-containing regimen, survival was increased by 11% (absolute difference) and cumulative costs were reduced by $US10,326 per patient (1998 discounted costs) at 5 years after starting treatment with efavirenz-based therapy. The Canadian analysis was conducted from the perspective of the Ontario healthcare system. This study did not consider differences in clinical efficacy between treatment groups, costs of study medication or outcomes beyond 1 year--all factors that would have favoured the efavirenz-based regimen. Of the 2 treatment options, the efavirenz-based regimen was associated with 7.4% lower average annual medical care costs, primarily because of greater costs associated with adverse clinical events with the indinavir-based regimen. In conclusion, current treatment guidelines for HIV infection recognise efavirenz-based combination regimens as a first-line treatment option. A pivotal comparative clinical trial (DMP 266-006) showed a significantly greater virological response to efavirenz- than indinavir-based triple combination therapy, and the efavirenz-based regimen was better tolerated. These clinical data are supported by pharmacoeconomic analyses conducted in the US and Canada, both of which showed lower medical care costs with the efavirenz-based regimen. The US analysis also predicted long term health benefits, such as improved survival, with efavirenz- versus indinavir-based triple combination therapy. These results must be weighed against the inherent difficulties of predicting long term treatment failure rates from short term data, and the limited number of pharmacoeconomic analyses conducted with efavirenz to date.

Alkynes↗
PubMed1998

Combination therapy for patients with HIV-1 infection: the use of dual nucleoside analogues with protease inhibitors and other agents.

This report reviews the design and preliminary results of ongoing and new studies that are evaluating novel antiretroviral drug combinations for the treatment of patients with HIV-1 infection. The studies reviewed in this report are: (1) Selection of Thymidine Analogue Regimen Therapy (START) I and II which compare three-drug combinations of stavudine (d4T), lamivudine (3TC), and indinavir, or d4T, didanosine (ddI), and indinavir versus zidovudine (ZDV), 3TC, and indinavir; (2) ATLANTIC, a study that compares d4T and didanosine (ddI) in combination with a third agent, either 3TC, nevirapine, or indinavir; and (3) the OZCOMBO studies: OZCOMBO 1, which compares two-drug combinations of d4T and 3TC, d4T and ddI, and ZDV and 3TC, all in combination with indinavir, and OZCOMBO 2, which compares two-drug combinations of d4T and ddI, ZDV and ddI, and ZDV and 3TC, all in combination with nevirapine. Preliminary results from these studies suggest that novel dual-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor pairs, d4T and 3TC, d4T and ddI, and ZDV and ddI, as part of three-drug combinations, achieve antiretroviral effects comparable to ZDV- and 3TC-based three-drug combination regimens.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed1998

Focal mycobacterial lymphadenitis following initiation of protease-inhibitor therapy in patients with advanced HIV-1 disease.

BACKGROUND: Inhibitors of HIV-1 protease produce a rapid decrease in plasma HIV-1 RNA, with concomitant increases in CD4 T-helper lymphocyte counts. The main side-effects of the protease inhibitors currently in use include gastrointestinal disturbances, paraesthesias, hyperbilirubinaemia, and nephrolithiasis. The increasing use of these agents in patients with advanced HIV-1 infection and CD4 counts of less than 50 cells/microL may be associated with unforeseen adverse effects not observed in earlier studies of patients with higher CD4 counts. METHODS: Five HIV-infected patients with baseline CD4 lymphocyte counts of less than 50 cells/mL were admitted to the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA, USA) with high fever (> 39 degrees C), leucocytosis, and evidence of lymph-node enlargement within 1-3 weeks of starting indinavir therapy. Informed consent was obtained for studies that entailed CD4 lymphocyte counts, immunophenotyping, isolator blood cultures, and radiological scans. Biopsy samples of cervical, paratracheal, or mesenteric lymph nodes were taken for culture and pathology in four patients. FINDINGS: Lymph-node biopsy samples showed that focal lymphadenitis after initiation of indinavir resulted from unsuspected local or disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection. The prominent inflammatory response to previously subclinical MAC infection was associated with leucocytosis in all patients and with an increase in the absolute lymphocyte counts in four patients. Three patients with follow-up CD4 counts showed two-fold to 19-fold increases after 1-3 weeks of indinavir therapy. Immunophenotyping after therapy in two patients showed that more than 90% of the CD4 cells were of the memory phenotype. INTERPRETATION: The initiation of indinavir therapy in patients with CD4 counts of less than 50 cells/mL and subclinical MAC infection may be associated with a severe illness, consisting of fever (> 39 degrees C), leucocytosis, and lymphadenitis (cervical, thoracic, or abdominal). The intense inflammatory reactions that make admission to hospital necessary may be secondary to significant numbers of functionally competent immune cells becoming available to respond to a heavy mycobacterial burden. Prophylaxis or screening for subclinical MAC infection, or both, should therefore be done before the beginning of protease-inhibitor therapy in patients with advanced HIV infection.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed1999

Dissimilar attenuation of Candida albicans virulence properties by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitors.

The secreted aspartyl proteinase (Sap) of Candida albicans, which is believed to represent an important virulence factor of this opportunistic yeast, and the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protease, which is obligatory for the production of infectious virions, both belong to the same family of aspartyl proteinases. We have previously shown that the HIV-1 protease inhibitor Indinavir directly inhibits secretion and proteinase activity of Sap in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, at very high concentrations, viability of C. albicans is markedly reduced by Indinavir, indicating that HIV-1 protease inhibitors may possess antifungal activity. We thus proposed that these drugs may add to the resolution of mucosal candidiasis in HIV-1 infected subjects. We have now compared three different HIV-1 protease inhibitors. The rank order of Sap inhibition, already significant at 0.1 mg/ml for all protease inhibitors, was Ritonavir > Indinavir > Saquinavir. However, the cross-reactivity of Ritonavir to pepsin was also more pronounced compared with the other two. Indinavir did not affect Candida viability at concentrations up to 1 mg/ml, in line with our previous study. In contrast, at this concentration Saquinavir was even fungicidal as assessed by three different viability assays (colony formation assay, MTT assay, propidium iodide staining) whereas Ritonavir significantly affected the mitochondrial activity only (MTT assay). No influence on Candida viability was observed for any of the three at concentrations of 0.1 mg/ml or lower. It remains to be examined whether HIV-1 protease inhibitors or derivatives thereof may be suitable for in vivo therapy of subjects suffering from mucosal candidiasis resistant to current antimycotics.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Drug resistance and predicted virologic responses to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitor therapy.

The extent to which human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 drug resistance compromises therapeutic efficacy is intimately tied to drug potency and exposure. Most HIV-1 protease inhibitors maintain in vivo trough levels above their human serum protein binding-corrected IC(95) values for wild-type HIV-1. However, these troughs are well below corrected IC(95) values for protease inhibitor-resistant viruses from patients experiencing virologic failure of indinavir and/or nelfinavir. This suggests that none of the single protease inhibitors would be effective after many cases of protease inhibitor failure. However, saquinavir, amprenavir, and indinavir blood levels are increased substantially when each is coadministered with ritonavir, with 12-h troughs exceeding corrected wild-type IC(95) by 2-, 7-, and 28-79-fold, respectively. These indinavir and amprenavir troughs exceed IC(95) for most protease inhibitor-resistant viruses tested. This suggests that twice-daily indinavir-ritonavir and, to a lesser extent, amprenavir-ritonavir may be effective for many patients with viruses resistant to protease inhibitors.

Carbamates↗
PubMed2001

Switching to nevirapine decreases insulin levels but does not improve subcutaneous adipocyte apoptosis in patients with highly active antiretroviral therapy-associated lipodystrophy.

Subcutaneous adipocyte apoptosis occurs in lipotrophic areas of patients with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)-associated lipodystrophy. Fourteen patients with HAART-associated lipodystrophy had 2 subcutaneous biopsies for evidence of adipocyte apoptosis, the second after a randomized change to nevirapine (n=8) or after remaining on a regimen of indinavir-based HAART (n=6). Apoptosis was assessed by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP-digoxigenin nick end-labeling method. Patients who were switched to nevirapine had a significant decrease in insulinemia and a significant increase in the glucose:insulin ratio. Overall, subcutaneous adipocyte apoptosis increased in 3 patients who were switched to nevirapine and in 3 who continued to receive indinavir but decreased in 2 patients switched to nevirapine and another 2 who continued to receive indinavir. Subcutaneous adipocyte apoptosis continues to occur in lipotrophic areas of patients with HAART-associated lipodystrophy despite switching from indinavir to nevirapine, suggesting that such a strategy will be useless for reversal of lipoatrophy.

Adipocytes↗
PubMed2003

Factors associated with maintenance of long-term plasma human immunodeficiency virus RNA suppression.

To analyze factors associated with long-term (>or=2 years) suppression of virus load (VL), we performed a nested case-control analysis of 1235 Human Immunodeficiency Virus Outpatient Study cohort participants who were well characterized by multiple VL and CD4(+) cell count determinations. Of these patients, 286 (23.1%) had maintained undetectable VLs (i.e., <400 copies/mm(3) or <50 copies/mm(3)) for >or=2 years. Being treatment naive at the start of antiretroviral therapy was associated with a greater likelihood of achieving long-term suppression of VL (odds ratio [OR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-2.0; P=.028). In multivariate models, abacavir, indinavir, efavirenz, and drug combinations that included both lamivudine and indinavir were the most effective treatments for achieving long-term suppression of VL (adjusted OR for each, >3.6; P value for each, <.01). Long-term suppression of VL is more likely in treatment-naive than in treatment-experienced patients, but there were several drugs--abacavir, efavirenz, indinavir, and drug combinations including lamivudine and indinavir--that appeared to be effective, whether they were part of a first or subsequent drug regimen.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Molecular mechanics analysis of drug-resistant mutants of HIV protease.

Drug-resistant mutants of HIV-1 protease limit the long-term effectiveness of current anti-viral therapy. In order to study drug resistance, the wild-type HIV-1 protease and the mutants R8Q, V32I, M46I, V82A, V82I, V82F, I84V, V32I/I84V and M46I/I84V were modeled with the inhibitors saquinavir and indinavir using the program AMMP. A new screen term was introduced to reproduce more correctly the electron distribution of atoms. The atomic partial charge was represented as a delocalized charge distribution instead of a point charge. The calculated protease-saquinavir interaction energies showed the highly significant correlation of 0.79 with free energy differences derived from the measured inhibition constants for all 10 models. Three different protonation states of indinavir were evaluated. The best indinavir model included a sulfate and gave a correlation coefficient of 0.68 between the calculated interaction energies and free energies from inhibition constants for nine models. The exception was R8Q with indinavir, probably due to differences in the solvation energy. No significant correlation was found using the standard molecular mechanics terms. The incorporation of the new screen correction resulted in better prediction of the effects of inhibitors on resistant protease variants and has potential for selecting more effective inhibitors for resistant virus.

Antiviral Agents↗