Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “General Practitioners”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 667 records · Page 37Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Is histological examination of tissue removed by general practitioners always necessary? Before and after comparison of detection rates of serious skin lesions.

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether histological examination of all tissue removed by general practitioners in minor surgery increases the rate of detection of clinically important skin lesions, and to assess the impact of such a policy on pathologists' workload. DESIGN: Before and after comparison. SETTING: Stratified random sample of 257 general practitioner partnerships from the catchment areas of 19 English pathology laboratories. SUBJECTS: Tissue removed in minor surgery by general practitioners during the control period (September 1992 to February 1993) and intervention period (September 1993 to February 1994). INTERVENTION: General practitioners referred to their local pathology laboratory all solid tissue removed in all minor surgery, irrespective of their previous policy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Numbers of specimens referred for histology by general practitioners during intervention and control periods; numbers of primary malignant melanomas, non-melanoma malignancies, premalignant lesions, and benign lesions. RESULTS: 257/330 partnerships participated (response rate 78%). During the intervention period 5723 specimens were sent, compared with 4430 during the control period. The referral rate increased by an estimated 1.34 specimens per 1000 patient years (95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.76, P < 0.0001). General practitioners sent 204 specimens that were malignant (including 16 malignant melanomas) in the control period and 188 that were malignant (including 15 malignant melanomas) during the intervention period (change in total number of malignancies, -1.0 per 100,000 patient years (-5.9 to 3.8, non-significant). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention was associated with a substantial increase in laboratory workload, all of which was accounted for by increases in non-serious lesions. This observation should be taken into account when considering the merits of a policy requiring histological examination in every case.

England↗
PubMed1989

General practitioners and their learning styles.

Continuing medical education sessions are often poorly attended by general practitioners. One reason may be that these traditionally consist of lectures by hospital consultants with a strong theoretical bias which may have little relevance to the learning needs of general practitioners. To compare the learning styles of teachers and learners in general practice, learning style questionnaires were administered to 50 hospital clinical tutors, 78 general practitioner trainers, 63 trainees and 47 non-trainer principals. The questionnaire covered four different learning preferences: activist, reflector, theorist and pragmatist. The findings showed that the learning styles of hospital tutors and general practitioner trainers were statistically significantly different to those of non-trainer principals and trainees. The tutors and trainers scored much higher on theorist styles and to a lesser extent on reflector and pragmatist styles. There were no significant differences on activist scores. Since teachers tend to teach in their preferred learning style, which may not match the style of the recipients, these findings have implications for continuing medical education in general practice. These implications are discussed.

Education, Medical, Continuing↗
PubMed2004

Prescribing indicators. Development and validation of guideline-based prescribing indicators as an instrument to measure the variation in the prescribing behaviour of general practitioners.

BACKGROUND: Differences in prescribing behaviour among general practitioners (GPs). AIM: To formulate and validate clinical prescribing indicators based on general practice guidelines. DESIGN: Validatory study. SETTING: Pharmacies and general practices in the Netherlands in 2003. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 379 pharmacies, 947 general practices and 3.8 million patients. METHODS: A total of 51 potential indicators were formulated, based on medicinal recommendations from the evidence-based guidelines of the Dutch College of General Practitioners and the corresponding recommendations from the Commission Pharmaceutical Help of the Health Care Insurance Board. These indicators were submitted to an expert panel to assess content validity. The panel assessment was analysed using the RAND-UCLA appropriateness method (RAM). Then, for the remaining indicators, it was assessed to what extent these could be used to determine the prescribing behaviour of GPs and the level to which this behaviour varies among GPs. This was done using a prescribing analyses and cost (PACT) database that was compiled from prescription databases from 379 pharmacies, with all prescriptions from 1,434 GPs over an entire year to 3.8 million patients. RESULTS: The panel considered 34 of the 51 potential indicators to be valid with respect to providing an adequate reflection of the central recommendations in the guideline and in terms of relevance with respect to health gain and/or efficiency. Of these 34 indicators, 20 revealed considerable differences in the prescribing behaviour of GPs. CONCLUSION: On the basis of existing general practice guidelines, 20 prescribing indicators could be formulated that were assessed by an expert panel to be sufficiently valid and which could also discriminate the prescribing behaviour of GPs as reflected in the prescription databases of pharmacies.

Databases, Factual↗
PubMed2001

[Herpes zoster: incidence study among "sentinel" general practitioners].

INTRODUCTION: Herpes zoster is a frequent disease but its incidence in France is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a postal survey among the general practitioners of the "Sentinel" network. The incidence of acute herpes zoster was extrapolated from the number of cases diagnosed during the year 1998, by the general practitioners who answered the questionnaire. The general practitioners were also surveyed on their prescriptions and attitude. RESULTS: Among the 1,368 "Sentinel" general practitioners, 744 (54.4 p. 100) participated in the survey. The incidence in 1998 was 3.2 cases for 1,000 inhabitants (95 p. 100 confidence interval: 3.0 - 3.4). For acute herpes zoster, 73 p. 100 of the patients have been given an oral antiviral drug, and 63 p. 100 an antalgic. Among the 605 reported herpes zoster cases, 111 (18.4 p. 100) subsequently had chronic pain. DISCUSSION: The estimated incidence is comparable to the incidence from others developed countries. To be interpreted, this estimation has to be discussed according to the sample of population that was studied and the representativity of the "Sentinelles" general practitioners who participated the survey.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

Role of the general practitioner in smoking cessation.

This paper reflects on the role of general practitioners in smoking cessation and suggests initiatives to enhance general practice as a setting for effective smoking cessation services. This paper is one of a series of reflections on key issues in smoking cessation. In this article we highlight the extent that general practitioners (GPs) have contact with the population, evidence for effectiveness of GP advice, barriers to greater involvement and suggested future directions. General practice has an extensive population reach, with the majority of smokers seeing a GP at least once per year. Although there is level 1 evidence of the effectiveness of smoking cessation advice from general practitioners, there are substantial barriers to this advice being incorporated routinely into primary care consultations. Initiatives to overcome these barriers are education in smoking cessation for GPs and other key practice staff; teaching of medical students about tobacco and cessation techniques, clinical practice guidelines; support for guideline implementation; access to pharmacotherapies; and development of referral models. We believe the way forward for the role of the GPs is to develop the practice as a primary care service for providing smoking cessation advice. This will require education relevant to the needs of a range of health professionals, provision of and support for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines, access for patients to smoking cessation pharmacotherapies and integration with other cessation services such as quitlines.

Curriculum↗
PubMed1995

Appropriate place of death for cancer patients: views of general practitioners and hospital doctors.

BACKGROUND: The majority of cancer patients in the United Kingdom die in a National Health Service hospital, a setting that is contrary to the wishes of those patients expressing a preference to die elsewhere, for example at home or in a hospice. AIM: A study was undertaken to determine clinicians' views of the appropriate place of death for cancer patients and to examine factors leading to patients being admitted to a hospital specialist services unit where they died. METHOD: A questionnaire was sent to all general practitioners and hospital doctors who had cared for cancer patients who had died between May 1991 and April 1992 in a single health district. The appropriateness of the place of death, whether the patient was terminally ill, reasons for hospital admission and effect on management had different resources been available were determined. RESULTS: A total of 1022 deaths attributable to cancer were recorded for patients registered with general practitioners in the study area. Questionnaires were returned by general practitioners for 951 of the deaths (93%); hospital doctors returned questionnaires for 216 out of 268 patients (81%) who had been admitted to hospital under the care of a consultant. For deaths which had occurred at home, in a community hospital, residential/nursing home or Marie Curie hospice, the place of death was considered appropriate by general practitioners in over 92% of cases. For deaths in the hospital specialist services unit the place of death was considered probably or definitely appropriate by general practitioners in 83% of the 212 cases, but not appropriate in 17% of cases (P < 0.001 compared with all other settings). Hospital doctors considered 27% of deaths in the unit inappropriate. Significantly fewer cases fulfilled the criteria for terminal illness (death expected and palliative treatment commenced) according to general practitioners among those dying in the specialist services unit compared with deaths elsewhere (P < 0.001). The most common main reasons for admission to the specialist services unit were for investigation, because of difficult symptom control (apart from pain) and for curative/active treatment. General practitioners reported that management of between a sixth and a quarter of patients admitted to the specialist services unit would have been affected by the availability of 24-hour home cover, community hospital beds and a city-based hospice. Among the group of patients fulfilling the study criteria for terminal illness, the effect of other services on patient management would have been considerably higher. CONCLUSION: A greater proportion of cases where patients died from cancer in settings other than a specialist services unit were considered appropriate by general practitioners compared with deaths in a specialist services unit. For a considerable minority of patients, death in a specialist services unit was not considered appropriate by the general practitioners or by the hospital doctors. Improvements in local hospice facilities, community hospitals and community support would mean that a substantial proportion of hospital admissions could be avoided and thus cancer patients could die in more appropriate settings.

Home Care Services↗
PubMed2004

[Burn out among French general practitioners].

OBJECTIVE: Assess the extent of burn out among the general practitioners of the Loire region (France). METHODS: A questionnaire in 3 parts was sent to 480 general practitioners: the first concerned the socio-demographical variables such as the age of the practitioners, their marital status, time when the installed their practice, type of practice and quantification of their professional activity; the second corresponded to the French version of the Maslach Burn out Inventory (MBI) and the third part foresaw the eventual consequences of burn out, such as the wish for retraining, use of psychotropics or suicidal thoughts. RESULTS: 306 practitioners replied (response rate 64%). Mean scores on the three dimensions of burn out (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, low personal accomplishment) were similar to those of other studies using the same instrument. Five per cent of the practitioners had high scores of burn out on the 3 subscales, but professional accomplishment remained high for a majority of physicians. More than 1 practitioner out of 2 had thought of retraining, 5.5% declared excessive drinking, 30% had taken psychotropics, and 13% have envisaged suicide. Emotional exhaustion was statistically associated with female sex, heavy workload, wish to retrain, drinking, psychotropics and suicidal ideation. The causes of burn out expressed by the practitioners were organizational and administrative (high workload, administrative demands, conflicts with social welfare organizations) but also relational (demands considered as excessive from their patients and families). DISCUSSION: Burn out among general practitioners is a reality. The quality of life of practitioners suffering from burn out appears significantly impaired, and published literature indicates that it may lead to deleterious consequences on the care provided to their patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

[Autopsies for general practitioners and for clinical specialists; analysis of indications].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reasons for autopsies requested by general practitioners, compared with autopsies requested by clinicians. DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive comparative study. SETTING: Department of Pathology, Free University Hospital, Amsterdam; Medical Centre Alkmaar; Regional Laboratory Twente, Enschede and Regional Pathology Laboratory, Blaricum. MATERIAL AND METHOD: In a series of 303 autopsies requested by general practitioners, the reasons for the autopsy were divided into the following categories: sudden unexpected death, short fatal course of disease, intrauterine and perinatal death, evaluation of a protracted course of disease, non-natural death, and others. Results were compared with two series of 2961 and 1747 autopsies performed for clinicians in a university hospital and a non-university hospital, respectively. RESULTS: General practitioners requested autopsy mainly in cases of sudden unexpected death (48.2%) and short fatal courses of disease (16.5%). For the autopsies requested by clinicians in the university hospital these figures were 6.1% and 15.5%, respectively, in the non-university hospital 9.1% and 18.2%. Owing to the autopsies requested the percentage of cases with unknown or uncertain cause of death was reduced from 67.1% to 14.4%. CONCLUSIONS: General practitioners mainly request autopsy when important questions of themselves or of the bereaved need to be answered. Thresholds for autopsy, including financial ones, need to be eliminated to enable general practitioners to request autopsies.

Academic Medical Centers↗
PubMed2003

Why do general practitioners prescribe antibiotics for sore throat? Grounded theory interview study.

OBJECTIVES: To understand why general practitioners prescribe antibiotics for some cases of sore throat and to explore the factors that influence their prescribing. DESIGN: Grounded theory interview study. SETTING: General practice. PARTICIPANTS: 40 general practitioners: 25 in the maximum variety sample and 15 in the theoretical sample. RESULTS: General practitioners are uncertain which patients will benefit from antibiotics but prescribe for sicker patients and for patients from socioeconomically deprived backgrounds because of concerns about complications. They are also more likely to prescribe in pressured clinical contexts. Doctors are mostly comfortable with their prescribing decisions and are not prescribing to maintain the doctor-patient relationship. CONCLUSIONS: General practitioners have reduced prescribing for sore throat in response to research and policy initiatives. Further interventions to reduce prescribing would need to improve identification of patients at risk of complications and be workable in busy clinical situations.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1999

Randomised controlled trial of effect of feedback on general practitioners' prescribing in Australia.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect on general practitioners' prescribing of feedback on their levels of prescribing. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: General practice in rural Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 2440 full time recognised general practitioners practising in non-urban areas. INTERVENTION: Two sets of graphical displays (6 months apart) of their prescribing rates for 2 years, relative to those of their peers, were posted to participants. Data were provided for five main drug groups and were accompanied by educational newsletters. The control group received no information on their prescribing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prescribing rates in the intervention and control groups for the five main drug groups, total prescribing and potential substitute prescribing and ordering before and after the interventions. RESULTS: The intervention and control groups had similar baseline characteristics (age, sex, patient mix, practices). Median prescribing rates for the two groups were almost identical before and after the interventions. Any changes in prescribing observed in the intervention group were also seen in the control group. There was no evidence that feedback reduced the variability in prescribing nor did it differentially affect the very high or very low prescribers. CONCLUSIONS: The form of feedback evaluated here-mailed, unsolicited, centralised, government sponsored, and based on aggregate data-had no impact on the prescribing levels of general practitioners.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

General practitioners' reported knowledge about depression and dementia in elderly patients.

Previous studies have shown that general practitioners often fail to detect dementia and depression in their elderly patients. The present study aimed to find out how much knowledge general practitioners have of these disorders. The knowledge of 36 general practitioners was assessed and it was found that they had a limited knowledge of the symptoms and signs of dementia and depression. Furthermore, almost 60% of the general practitioners did not know that Alzheimer's disease is the most common dementing disorder.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

How do General Practitioners learn of their patient's deaths?

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the methods by which General Practitioners learn, or do not learn, of their patients deaths, when the deaths occur in an institution in which the General Practitioner has no direct role in their care. DESIGN: Using a semi-structured telephone questionnaire the relevant General Practitioners were asked of the method, if any, by which they had learned of their patients deaths, and their views on this. SETTING: Sligo, Ireland. RESULTS: In 6 (16%) of the 37 cases, the GP was informed of the death within one working day by hospital staff. In 22 (59%) of the cases, the GP had learned of the death through other means. In 9 (26%) of the cases the GP had not learned of the death. In 28 (75%) of the cases, the GPs were dissatisfied with either the fact that they did not know of the death, or even if they did know, the method by which they learned of the patients death. CONCLUSION: General Practitioners, for a variety of reasons, wish to learn of their patient's deaths within a short length of time of such deaths occurring. When deaths occur in an institution in which the GP has no direct role in the care of their patients, the information is not forwarded to the GP within a reasonable length of time in the vast majority of cases. Such institutions need to realise the importance of this simple act, and to make it routine to forward the information.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1998

What do general practitioners do when patients present with symptoms indicative of urinary tract infections?

AIM: The primary aim of the study was to examine whether the results of laboratory investigations of midstream urine samples from patients with suspected urinary tract infection influenced management by general practitioners. METHOD: Eleven general practitioners in the Network participated in the study by recording treatment and outcomes for consecutive patients with symptoms of urinary tract infection. RESULTS: Data from 216 patients were included in the study. Dipsticks were used to test the urine of 98 patients (45%) and midstream urine samples were sent to the laboratory for 176 patients (82%). Antibiotics were prescribed for 176 patients (82%). Antibiotics were prescribed for 95% of patients with symptoms of dysuria, frequency and urgency. Where the laboratory results showed infection there was no change in treatment after the general practitioners received the results for 75 patients (85%). Among those patients where the laboratory reported no infection there was no change in treatment after the general practitioner received the results for 53 patients (87%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of laboratory investigation of midstream urine samples did not change the treatment provided for the majority of patients in the study.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Use of the consultation satisfaction questionnaire to examine patients' satisfaction with general practitioners and community nurses: reliability, replicability and discriminant validity.

BACKGROUND: Primary health care services are the most frequently used in the health care system. Consumer feedback on these services is important. Research in this area relates mainly to doctor-patient relationships which fails to reflect the multidisciplinary nature of primary health care. AIM: A pilot study aimed to examine the feasibility of using a patient satisfaction questionnaire designed for use with general practitioner consultations as an instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with community nurses. METHOD: The questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with general practitioner consultations was adapted for measuring satisfaction with contacts with a nurse practitioner, district nurses, practice nurses and health visitors. A total of 1575 patients in three practices consulting general practitioners or community nurses were invited to complete a questionnaire. Data were subjected to principal components analysis and the dimensions identified were tested for internal reliability and replicability. To establish discriminant validity, patients' mean satisfaction scores for consultations with general practitioners, the nurse practitioner, health visitors and nurses (district and practice nurses) were compared. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned relating to 400 general practitioner, 54 nurse practitioner, 191 district/practice nurse and 83 health visitor consultations (overall response rate 46%). Principal components analysis demonstrated a factor structure similar to that found in an earlier study of the consultation satisfaction questionnaire. Three dimensions of patient satisfaction were identified: professional care, depth of relationship and perceived time spent with the health professional. The dimensions were found to have acceptable levels of reliability. Factor structures obtained from data relating to general practitioner and community nurse consultations were found to correlate significantly. Comparison between health professionals showed that patients rated satisfaction with professional care significantly more highly for nurses than for general practitioners and health visitors. Patients' rating of satisfaction with the depth of relationships with health visitors was significantly lower than their ratings of this relationship with the other groups of health professionals. There were so significant differences between health professional groups regarding patients' ratings of satisfaction with the perceived amount of time spent with health professionals. CONCLUSION: The pilot study showed that it is possible to use the consultation satisfaction questionnaire for both general practitioners and community nurses. Comparison between health professional groups should be undertaken with caution as data were available for only a small number of consultations with some of the groups of health professionals studied.

Community Health Nursing↗
PubMed1993

Work patterns of general practitioners before and after the introduction of the 1990 contract.

A questionnaire survey was undertaken to examine the work patterns of general practitioners before and after the introduction of the 1990 contract. A total of 408 and 697 general practitioners responded to the questionnaire in 1989 and 1991, respectively (response rates of 47% and 82%). In 1991 general practitioners reported spending significantly more evenings on paperwork than in 1989 and significantly more reported being exhausted or stressed at the end of five or more working days. General practitioners were significantly less likely to work four or more sessions per week outside the practice in 1991 than in 1989. There was no difference between 1989 and 1991 in the number of surgeries carried out per week or the number of nights spent on call in a month. In 1991 there was no correlation between the Jarman index allocated to a practice principal and the numbers of surgeries per week, sessions worked outside the practice per week, nights on call per month, weekdays exhausted or stressed, or evenings each week spent on paperwork. Older doctors in 1991 were significantly more likely to work 12 or more nights on call per month, to spend more time doing paperwork in the evenings and more likely to report exhaustion than younger doctors. Women doctors in 1991 were significantly more likely to report doing 10 or more surgeries per week than their men colleagues. It has become more common for general practitioners to complete paperwork at home and report exhaustion or stress since the introduction of the 1990 contract.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

"What sort of health promotion are you talking about?": a discourse analysis of the talk of general practitioners.

In New Zealand, health promotion is now expected to be an integral part of the work of a general practitioner, and in the recently implemented New Zealand Primary Health Organisation structure, specific funding is available to undertake health promotion activities in primary care. Eighteen general practitioners recruited to take part in two focus groups discussing men's health, talked extensively about health promotion. This talk was analysed through a discourse analysis. This study of the 'talk' of general practitioners suggests that there are problems in transferring the concept, which must be recognised and addressed if health promotion is going to be taken up effectively within general practice. The meaning given to health promotion in the consultation is unclear and general practitioners were unsure about its value in 'health checks' and screening. Lack of time and lack of confidence in the evidence appeared to be barriers to undertaking health promotion within general practice consultations. In the current climate general practitioners are uncertain, to the point of ambivalence, about health promotion in their work. Further work will be required to ensure this ambivalence does not result in covert resistance.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

General practitioners' attitudes to child injury prevention in the UK: a national postal questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: To survey the level of interest and involvement in child injury prevention among general practitioners and their practice teams, and to identify factors associated with current interest. DESIGN: Postal survey of a random sample of United Kingdom (UK) medical practitioners. SETTING: Medical practices throughout the UK. SUBJECTS: 957 general practitioners (50% of the total sample) who responded to the survey questionnaire. OUTCOMES: Answer to questions about role in injury prevention. RESULTS: Despite a response rate of only 50%, this study is the largest to examine the role of general practitioners in child injury prevention. Seven hundred and twenty five (77%) of the respondents considered injury prevention to be part of the general practitioner's role, but only 260 (28%) felt that they did enough in this area. Time was cited as the most significant limiting factor. Women doctors, rural practitioners, members of the Royal College of General Practitioners, and doctors with previous personal experience of serious accidents all had more positive attitudes to injury prevention as a routine part of their activities (p < 0.05). Practices providing first aid training for staff were also associated with an interest in injury prevention. The most appropriate times for offering prevention advice were thought to be during child health surveillance clinics and during treatment of an accident. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness about injury prevention opportunities might be improved by emphasising the roles of individual team members and by better addressing the training needs of the whole team.

Adult↗