Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Digoxin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 667 records · Page 37Linked to original sources

Canrenoate reversal of inhibitory effects of digoxin on basal and furosemide-stimulated renin secretion.

Changes in plasma renin activity (PRA) were monitored in six mildly hypertensive men after intravenous doses, in seven separate experiments, of placebo, digoxin, potassium canrenoate, potassium canrenoate with digoxin, furosemide, furosemide with digoxin, and potassium canrenoate with furosemide and digoxin. Potassium canrenoate has been used as a rapid source of canrenone, which has been recently shown to be a competitive antagonist of ouabain at its Na-K-ATPase receptor site. Potassium canrenoate infusion reversed the hyporeninemic effect of digoxin. This result has been taken as evidence that: (1) antialdosteronic drugs can also reverse digoxin effects at extracardiac level and (2) the Na-K-ATPase system is involved in the renin secretory mechanism. A seemingly identical reversal of the hyporeninemic effect of digoxin was induced by furosemide, which, when given alone, stimulated renin secretion. The simultaneous administration of potassium canrenoate, digoxin, and furosemide induced an increase in PRA on the same order as that after furosemide alone. This result indicates that furosemide stimulates renin release by affecting a biochemical system other than that affected by digoxin.

Adult↗

Interactions between digoxin and potassium-sparing diuretics.

A kinetic and hemodynamic study of digoxin was performed in six healthy subjects and similar studies were performed during digoxin with spironolactone and with triamterene. Spironolactone reduced renal tubular secretion of digoxin and attenuated its positive inotropic effect (evaluated by systolic time intervals and echocardiography) and triamterene reduced the extrarenal elimination of digoxin, but induced no changes in digoxin-elicited inotrophy. It is suggested that the renal handling of digoxin is influenced by the intracellular potassium concentration in the renal tubular cell. The results indicate a drug-receptor interaction between spironolactone metabolites and digoxin at the hypothetical inotropic digitalis receptor. Amiloride has been reported to suppress digoxin inotropism, whereas spironolactone induces minor inhibition and triamterene does not affect digoxin inotropism.

Adult↗

Dose-dependence of the nifedipine-digoxin interaction?

The dose-dependence of the nifedipine-digoxin interaction was investigated in seven healthy subjects. After an adequate loading dose of digoxin for 2 weeks, 0.25 mg digoxin b.i.d. was given by mouth by itself. Afterwards, 0.25 mg digoxin was given twice a day for three 1-week periods in combination with capsules of nifedipine, 5, 10, or 20 mg, respectively, given on a thrice-daily basis. The study ended with a digoxin monotherapy phase lasting 7 days. All three doses of nifedipine significantly increased digoxin plasma concentrations and AUC compared with digoxin monotherapy. Thus, for example, the AUC was 10.16 +/- 0.88 ng/ml . hr (mean +/- SE) when digoxin was given alone and 12.33 +/- 1.59 ng/ml . hr with concurrent nifedipine, 5 mg t.i.d. (P less than 0.05). Nifedipine causes a slight but significant increase (15%) in digoxin plasma concentrations and AUC. This effect did not depend on the nifedipine dose given in the range studied.

Administration, Oral↗

Inhibitory effects of digoxin and digitoxin on corticosterone production in rat zona fasciculata-reticularis cells.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the direct effects and action mechanisms of digitalis on the production of corticosterone in rat adrenocortical cells. Male rats were challenged with digoxin (1 microg ml(-1) kg(-1)) in the presence or absence of adrenocorticotropin (ACTH, 5 microg ml(-1) kg(-1)) administered by intravenous injection to the right jugular vein. Blood samples were collected at 0, 30, 60, and 120 min following the challenge. The concentration of corticosterone in the rat plasma samples was measured by radioimmunoassay. Zona fasciculata-reticularis (ZFR) cells in male rats were prepared and then incubated with or without digoxin or digitoxin in the presence or absence of ACTH (10(-9) m), forskolin (10(-7) m), 8-bromo-cyclic 3' : 5'-adenosine monophosphate (10(-4) m), cyclopiazonic acid (CPA, 10(-5) m), trilostane (10(-6) m), 25-OH-cholesterol (10(-5) m), pregnenolone (10(-5) m), progesterone (10(-5) m), or deoxycorticosterone (10(-5) m) at 37 degrees C for 1 h before collection of the media. Corticosterone or pregnenolone levels were measured by radioimmunoassay. A single injection of digoxin did not alter the basal level of plasma corticosterone, but did inhibit the level of plasma corticosterone released in response to ACTH in vivo. Administration of digoxin or digitoxin decreased both spontaneous and ACTH-stimulated release of corticosterone in vitro. Digoxin (10(-7)-10(-5) m) and digitoxin (10(-7)-10(-5) m), but not ouabain (10(-7)-10(-5) m), dose-dependently inhibited corticosterone production in response to forskolin and 8-Br-cyclic AMP in rat ZFR cells. Both digoxin (10(-6)-10(-5) m) and digitoxin (10(-6)-10(-5) m) attenuated corticosterone production in response to CPA. Digoxin (10(-5) m) or digitoxin (10(-5) m) inhibited cytochrome P450 side-chain cleavage enzyme (cytochrome P450scc) activity (catalyses conversion of cholesterol to pregnenolone in the presence of trilostane) in rat ZFR cells. The enzyme activity of 11 beta-hydroxylase (catalyses conversion of deoxycorticosterone to corticosterone) in ZFR cells was also inhibited by the administration of digoxin (10(-5) m) or digitoxin (10(-5) m).10 These results together suggest that digoxin and digitoxin decrease the release of corticosterone by acting directly on ZFR cells via a Na+, K+-ATPase-independent mechanism involving the inhibition of the activities of adenylyl cyclase, cytochrome P450scc and 11 beta-hydroxylase, as well as the functioning of cyclic AMP and intracellular calcium.

Adenylyl Cyclases↗

Lack of interaction between valaciclovir, the L-valyl ester of aciclovir, and digoxin.

AIMS: Changes in both digoxin and aciclovir renal clearance following coadministration with some other renally eliminated drugs have been reported. The potential interaction of valaciclovir, with its antiherpetic metabolite aciclovir, and digoxin was investigated. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers (seven males, five females) participated in an open, randomized, four-period crossover study. Valaciclovir, 1000 mg, was given alone on one occasion, and on another, after the second of two 0.75 mg digoxin doses administered 12 h apart. Blood samples and all urine were collected up to 12 h following the valaciclovir dose for aciclovir radioimmunoassay. On a third occasion, digoxin was given alone and on a fourth, with 1000 mg valaciclovir three times/day for 8 days starting 12 h before the first digoxin dose. Blood samples were taken up to 168 h and all urine collected up to 24 h following the second dose for digoxin radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: There were no clinically significant differences in digoxin or aciclovir pharmacokinetic parameters when digoxin or valaciclovir was given alone or in combination. CONCLUSIONS: No dosage adjustment is required when valaciclovir and digoxin are coadministered.

Acyclovir↗

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions between digoxin and macrogol 4000, a laxative polymer, in healthy volunteers.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to examine the bioequivalence between a single oral dose of digoxin administered alone and with a coadministration of macrogol 4000 (a laxative polymer) in 18 healthy volunteers. METHODS: This was an open, randomised, two-way cross-over study, with a single dose oral administration of 0.5 mg digoxin administered alone or in combination with macrogol 4000, 20 g day-1 during 8 days. Pharmacokinetics of digoxin, heart rate and PR ECG interval at rest were assessed. RESULTS: Macrogol 4000 coadministration was associated with a 30% decrease of digoxin AUC and a 40% decrease in its Cmax (P<0.05). Digoxin tmax and t1/2,z were not significantly altered. Heart rate and PR interval did not differ during the two therapeutic sequences, digoxin alone and digoxin in combination. CONCLUSIONS: Macrogol 4000 coadministration interacts with single-dose digoxin pharmacokinetics. This is most likely due to a reduction of the intestinal absorption of digoxin. However, there was no consequence of this interaction on heart rate and AV conduction.

Adult↗

Population analysis for the optimization of digoxin treatment in Japanese paediatric patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Information about the pharmacokinetics of digoxin in paediatric patients is limited. We therefore aimed to investigate the effects of physiological factors on the digoxin clearance in Japanese paediatric patients. METHOD: We used routinely collected therapeutic drug monitoring data (n=544), derived from the steady-state serum concentrations of digoxin in 181 hospitalized paediatric patients. RESULTS: Of those physiological factors which have been examined in this study, age and total body weight were most closely correlated with digoxin clearance. Data on neonates within the first postnatal month indicated a tendency towards lower clearance for premature neonates than full-term neonates (P<0.01). Digoxin clearance was reduced by spironolactone in patients younger than 4 months (P<0.05). Patients with congestive heart failure showed a lower digoxin clearance than the others (P<0.001). Serum creatinine and gender did not have a statistically significant effect on digoxin clearance. CONCLUSION: Age and total body weight are important factors influencing digoxin clearance in children. Spironolactone affected digoxin clearance and needs to be considered when dosing paediatric subjects.

Age Factors↗

Digoxin- and monensin-induced changes of intracellular Ca2+ concentration in isolated guinea-pig ventricular myocyte.

This study was undertaken to determine the possible mechanisms of actions of monensin and digoxin by using isolated guinea-pig ventricular myocytes. Since Ca2+ is the major signal for triggering contraction of cardiac muscle, the objective of this study was to determine whether monensin and digoxin affect the [Ca2+]i of cardiac myocytes and if so is this effect due to an increase in [Na+]i. Three different concentrations of digoxin (0.3, 1 and 3 micromol/l) and three different concentrations of monensin (0.3, 1 and 3 micromol/l) were used. Each treatment was monitored for two hours by using computerized fluoroscopy. Both digoxin and monensin increased the [Ca2+]i and accelerated the onset time of [Ca2+]i increase in a dose-dependent manner. Normal myocytes (loaded with fura-2 for 30 min before the treatment) were also compared with 'weakened' myocytes (loaded with fura-2 for 3 h before the treatment to create a 'weakened' condition). It was found that although 0.3 micromol/l monensin and digoxin did not change the [Ca2+]i in normal myocytes, they increased the [Ca2 +]i in 'weakened' myocytes. Finally, a Na+-free medium was used to demonstrate the effect of [Na+]o on both monensin- and digoxin-induced increases in [Ca2+]i. It was found that digoxin did not increase the [Ca2+]i in the Na+-free medium. Although monensin increased the [Ca2+]i in the Na+-free solution, this increase was not as large as in the Na+-containing medium. The results of the study led to the conclusion that the positive inotropic effect of digoxin depends on [Na+]o. However, monensin increases [Ca2+]i in Na+-dependent and -independent ways. An addition conclusion was that 'weakened' myocytes are more sensitive to the monensin and digoxin treatment than normal myocytes.

Animals↗

Digoxin therapy and mortality after myocardial infarction. Experience in the MILIS Study.

Recent studies have led to controversy about whether long-term digoxin therapy after confirmed or suspected myocardial infarction increases mortality. We analyzed the mortality experience in 903 patients enrolled in the Multicenter Investigation of Limitation of Infarct Size (MILIS). As in previous studies, the decision to treat or not to treat with digoxin was made by the patient's personal physician on the basis of the usual clinical indications. Cumulative mortality was 28 percent for the 281 digoxin-treated patients as compared with 11 percent for the 622 patients who did not receive digoxin (P less than 0.001; follow-up interval, six days to 36 months; mean, 25.1 months). However, patients treated with digoxin had more base-line characteristics predictive of mortality than did their counterparts. Adjustment for these differences with two separate applications of the Cox method yielded P values of 0.14 and 0.34 for tests of difference in mortality, providing no evidence for a significant excess mortality associated with digoxin. Thus, the findings in the MILIS population do not support the assertion that digoxin therapy is excessively hazardous after infarction, but the existence of an undetected harmful effect can only be excluded with a randomized study. Until the results of such a study are available, we recommend careful consideration of whether any treatment of ventricular dysfunction is actually needed, consideration of alternatives to digoxin therapy, and restriction of digoxin use to the subgroup of patients (with severe chronic congestive failure and a dilated left ventricle) previously shown to have a beneficial clinical response.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Withdrawal of digoxin from patients with chronic heart failure treated with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors. RADIANCE Study.

BACKGROUND: Although digoxin is effective in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure who are receiving diuretic agents, it is not clear whether the drug has a role when patients are receiving angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors, as is often the case in current practice. METHODS: We studied 178 patients with New York Heart Association class II or III heart failure and left ventricular ejection fractions of 35 percent or less in normal sinus rhythm who were clinically stable while receiving digoxin, diuretics, and an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (captopril or enalapril). The patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion either to continue receiving digoxin (85 patients) or to be switched to placebo (93 patients) for 12 weeks. Otherwise, their medical therapy for heart failure was not changed. RESULTS: Worsening heart failure necessitating withdrawal from the study developed in 23 patients switched to placebo, but in only 4 patients who continued to receive digoxin (P < 0.001). The relative risk of worsening heart failure in the placebo group as compared with the digoxin group was 5.9 (95 percent confidence interval, 2.1 to 17.2). All measures of functional capacity deteriorated in the patients receiving placebo as compared with those continuing to receive digoxin (P = 0.033 for maximal exercise tolerance, P = 0.01 for submaximal exercise endurance, and P = 0.019 for New York Heart Association class). In addition, the patients switched from digoxin to placebo had lower quality-of-life scores (P = 0.04), decreased ejection fractions (P = 0.001), and increases in heart rate (P = 0.001) and body weight (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that the withdrawal of digoxin carries considerable risks for patients with chronic heart failure and impaired systolic function who have remained clinically stable while receiving digoxin and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors.

Captopril↗

The effect of digoxin on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: The role of cardiac glycosides in treating patients with chronic heart failure and normal sinus rhythm remains controversial. We studied the effect of digoxin on mortality and hospitalization in a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. METHODS: In the main trial, patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.45 or less were randomly assigned to digoxin (3397 patients) or placebo (3403 patients) in addition to diuretics and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (median dose of digoxin, 0.25 mg per day; average follow-up, 37 months). In an ancillary trial of patients with ejection fractions greater than 0.45, 492 patients were randomly assigned to digoxin and 496 to placebo. RESULTS: In the main trial, mortality was unaffected. There were 1181 deaths (34.8 percent) with digoxin and 1194 deaths (35.1 percent) with placebo (risk ratio when digoxin was compared with placebo, 0.99; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.91 to 1.07; P=0.80). In the digoxin group, there was a trend toward a decrease in the risk of death attributed to worsening heart failure (risk ratio, 0.88; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.77 to 1.01; P=0.06). There were 6 percent fewer hospitalizations overall in that group than in the placebo group, and fewer patients were hospitalized for worsening heart failure (26.8 percent vs. 34.7 percent; risk ratio, 0.72; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.66 to 0.79; P<0.001). In the ancillary trial, the findings regarding the primary combined outcome of death or hospitalization due to worsening heart failure were consistent with the results of the main trial. CONCLUSIONS: Digoxin did not reduce overall mortality, but it reduced the rate of hospitalization both overall and for worsening heart failure. These findings define more precisely the role of digoxin in the management of chronic heart failure.

Aged↗

Role of human MDR1 gene polymorphism in bioavailability and interaction of digoxin, a substrate of P-glycoprotein.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to quantitate the contribution of the genetic polymorphism of the human MDR1 gene to the bioavailability and interaction profiles of digoxin, a substrate of P-glycoprotein. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of digoxin was studied in 15 healthy volunteers, who were divided into 3 groups (n = 5 each) on the basis of genotyping for the MDR1 gene, in a 4-dose study after single doses of digoxin alone (0.5 mg orally and intravenously) and coadministered with clarithromycin (400 mg orally for 8 days). The dose of digoxin was reduced during the clarithromycin phase (0.25 mg orally and intravenously). RESULTS: The bioavailability of digoxin in G/G2677C/C3435, G/T2677C/T3435, and T/T2677T/T3435 subjects were 67.6% +/- 4.3%, 80.9% +/- 8.9%, and 87.1% +/- 8.4%, respectively, and the difference between G/G2677C/C3435 and T/T2677T/T3435 subjects was statistically significant (P <.05). The MDR1 variants were also associated with differences in disposition kinetics of digoxin, with the renal clearance being almost 32% lower in T/T2677T/T3435 subjects (1.9 +/- 0.1 mL/min per kilogram) than G/G2677C/C3435 subjects (2.8 +/- 0.3 mL/min per kilogram), and G/T2677C/T3435 subjects having an intermediate value (2.1 +/- 0.6 mL/min per kilogram). Coadministration of clarithromycin did not consistently affect digoxin clearance or renal clearance. However, a significant increase in digoxin bioavailability was observed in G/G2677C/C3435 subjects (67.6% +/- 4.3% versus 85.4% +/- 6.1%; P <.05) but not in the other 2 genotype groups. CONCLUSION: The allelic variants in the human MDR1 gene are likely to be associated with altered absorption and/or disposition profiles of digoxin and P-glycoprotein-mediated drug interaction

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗

Involvement of Cdk5/p25 in digoxin-triggered prostate cancer cell apoptosis.

Cardiac digitalis has been considered to be a treatment for breast cancer. Our previous study indicates that digoxin, one member in digitalis, decreases the proliferation of prostate cancer cells, but the mechanisms remain unclear. In the present study, Ca(2+) proved to be an important factor in digoxin-triggered prostate cancer cell death. Because cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk)5 and p35 cleavage (p25 formation) have been reported to be targets of intracellular Ca(2+), and subsequently correlated to apoptosis, we not only demonstrated first that Cdk5, p35, and p25 proteins were all expressed in prostate cancer cells (including lymph node carcinoma of the prostate (LNCaP) and DU-145 cells), but also showed where p25 formation and Cdk5 kinase activity were affected by treatment with digoxin. The inhibitor of p35 cleavage (calpeptin) was used to reduce p25 formation, and the result suggested that p25 accumulation might be the major cause of digoxin-triggered LNCaP cell death. Butyrolactone-I and roscovitine, two Cdk5 kinase inhibitors, were also found to prevent digoxin-triggered LNCaP cell death. In addition, treatment of siRNA-Cdk5 diminished digoxin-triggered cell death, as compared with the treatments of siRNA-Cdk1 or siRNA-Cdk2, which implies the specific involvement of Cdk5 in digoxin-triggered cell death. Caspase inhibitor set and terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling assay were used to demonstrate that digoxin-triggered LNCaP cell apoptosis through Cdk5 activation. These results suggest that Cdk5/p35 and p25 are novel players in digoxin-triggered prostate cancer cell apoptosis and, therefore, become potential therapeutic targets.

4-Butyrolactone↗

Central role of hypothalamic digoxin in conscious perception, neuroimmunoendocrine integration, and coordination of cellular function: relation to hemispheric dominance.

Alteration in the isoprenoid metabolites--digoxin, ubiquinone, and dolichol--have been reported in neuronal degeneration (Parkinson's disease), oncogenesis (central nervous system glioma), functional neuropsychiatric disorders (schizophrenia and epilepsy), and immune-mediated disorders (multiple sclerosis). The coexistence of these disorders has been documented in literature and a central dysfunction related to digoxin and the isoprenoid pathway may underlie all these disorders. A family with a high prevalence of Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, neoplasms, syndrome X, rheumatoid arthritis, and epilepsy has been described. The psychological behavioral patterns of the family were: creativity and high IQ, hypersexual behavior, reduced appetite and eating behavior, insomnia and reduced sleep patterns, increased tendency for spirituality, increased tendency for addiction, less bonding and affectionate behavior, and left handedness/right hemispheric dominance. Digoxin, an endogenous Na(+)-K+ ATPase inhibitor secreted by the hypothalamus, was found to be elevated and red blood cell (RBC) membrane Na(+)-K+ ATPase activity was found to be reduced in all the disorders and in the indexed family studied. Hypothalamic digoxin can modulate conscious perception and its dysfunction may lead to schizophrenia. Digoxin can also preferentially upregulate tryptophan transport over tyrosine, resulting in increased levels of depolarizng tryptophan catabolites, serotonin, quinolinic acid, strychnine, and nicotine, and decreased levels of hyperpolarizing tyrosine catabolites, dopamine, noradrenaline, and morphine, contributing to membrane Na(+)-K+ ATPase inhibition in all the above disorders and the indexed family. Digoxin-induced membrane Na(+)-K+ ATPase inhibition can result in increased intracellular Ca2+ and reduced Mg2+ levels, leading on to glutamate excitotoxicity, oncogene activation, and immune activation. Digoxin-induced altered Ca2+/Mg2+ ratios, reduced ubiquinone, and increased dolichol can affect glycoconjugate metabolism, membrane formation and structure, and mitochondrial function, leading to the diverse disorders described above, including those in the indexed family. The isoprenoid pathway and neurotransmitter patterns were compared in right-handed/LH dominant and left-handed/RH dominant individuals. The left-handed/RH dominant individuals compared to right-handed/LH dominant individuals had elevated hydroxymethylglutarylcoenzyme A reductase activity, with increased serum digoxin and dolichol levels. The serum ubiquinone, serum Mg2+ and RBC Na(+)-K+ ATPase activity were reduced in left-handed/RH dominant individuals. The left-handed/RH dominant individuals compared to right-handed/LH dominant individuals had elevated levels of serum tryptophan, quinolinic acid, serotonin, nicotine, and strychnine. The levels of tyrosine, dopamine, noradrenaline, and morphine were low in left-handed/RH dominant compared to right-handed/LH dominant individuals. The hyperdigoxinemic state indicates right hemispheric dominance. Hypothalamic digoxin can thus function as the master conductor of the neuroimmunoendocrine orchestra and coordinate the functions of various cellular organelles.

Brain Diseases↗

Is digoxin an independent risk factor for long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction?

The safety of treatment with digoxin in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) was investigated in 584 hospital survivors of MI. All patients were examined by radionuclide ventriculography, with determination of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), close to the time of discharge. Clinical data were collected on admission. All patients were followed up with regard to death (median 6.2 years, range 3.9-7.8 years). Patients treated with digoxin (N = 172 (29%) were older (median 66 vs 59 years; (P < 0.001), had a higher incidence of diabetes (13% vs 7%; P = 0.025), and a lower LVEF (0.33 vs 0.49; P < 0.001). As expected, clinical heart failure was more frequent among them (84% vs 14%; P < 0.001), than in patients not receiving digoxin. The 1- and 5-year mortality of patients treated with digoxin was 38% and 74% compared to 8% and 26% in patients not receiving digoxin (P < 0.001). The increased risk associated with digoxin therapy remained statistically significant when patients were stratified according to the presence or absence of heart failure or atrial fibrillation/flutter during hospitalization, or to LVEF above or below 0.45 at discharge. In a proportional hazard model including age, LVEF, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, atrial fibrillation or flutter, ventricular fibrillation, gender, dose of furosemide at discharge and calcium antagonists and digoxin treatment as covariates, digoxin was independently associated with an increased risk of death (relative risk 1.8 (95% confidence limit 1.2-2.5)). We conclude that administration of digoxin may be harmful in hospital survivors of MI.

Aged↗

Mechanism of the pulmonary vasoconstrictor action of digoxin in the dog.

The pulmonary vascular effects of a subarrhythmic dose of digoxin (60 micrograms/kg i.v.) were examined in the canine in situ perfused lung. Digoxin produced an increase in pulmonary vascular resistance (66.1%) and pulmonary arterial pressure (8.2 mm Hg) at 70 min after injection in the constant-flow, blood-perfused lung preparation. The digoxin-treated group exhibited higher plasma levels of norepinephrine compared with control dogs. The pulmonary vasoconstrictor response to digoxin was abolished by prior treatment with the alpha-adrenergic antagonists phenoxybenzamine and phentolamine. This vasoconstriction does not involve inhibition of synthesis or action of vasodilator prostaglandins by digoxin, as pretreatment with indomethacin did not attenuate, and even tended to increase, the pressor response to digoxin. The response was prevented by prior treatment with blockers of nonneuronal uptake of catecholamines normetanephrine and hydrocortisone, but not with cocaine, a blocker of neuronal uptake. In the lung preparation perfused with Krebs buffer solution, digoxin failed to produce vasoconstriction when administered intravenously (60 micrograms/kg) or in the perfusate at a concentration of 8 ng/ml, the blood level at the peak of the pressor response. Sodium-pump activity (ouabain-sensitive 86Rb+ uptake) of intralobular pulmonary arteries excised after 90 min of exposure to digoxin was the same as activity in arteries from control dogs. In conclusion, digoxin produces a pulmonary vasoconstriction through an alpha-adrenergic mechanism. Since the pressor response was observed only in the blood-perfused lung, blood-borne catecholamines are apparently involved.

Anesthesia↗

Analytic performance of two automated nonpretreatment digoxin immunoassays.

The analytic performance of two automated nonpretreatment digoxin methods, AxSYM Digoxin II and Vitros digoxin immunoassays, was assessed. Both assays had analytic sensitivities of less than 0.2 microg/L, were linear from digoxin concentrations of 0.5 to 4.0 microg/L, and showed acceptable precision, with a maximum total coefficient of variation (CV) of 8.9% and 6.4% for the AxSYM and Vitros, respectively. Comparison of the two methods using samples from patients receiving digoxin gave the following relationship: Vitros = 0.91 x AxSYM + 0.23 (r = 0.97, Sy,x = 0.12). Digoxinlike immunoreactive factor (DLIF) crossreactivity was examined in specimens from patients who had hepatic disease, renal insufficiency, had undergone cardiac surgery, and in neonatal cord blood samples. Minimal crossreactivity was observed for most samples and the average crossreactivity for each group of samples was comparable for the two methods. The recovery of digoxin added to samples from each group of DLIF was similar, except for that from cord blood samples, for which recovery was significantly lower with the AxSYM method. Titration of a digoxin-spiked serum pool with digoxin-immune Fab showed a similar decrease in the measured digoxin concentration for both methods. Overall, the analytic performance characteristics of these two methods were comparable.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗

Beta2-microglobulin adsorption column reduces digoxin trough level during hemodialysis: three case reports.

We have previously reported that a beta2-microglobulin adsorption column for the treatment of dialysis-related amyloidosis decreased serum digoxin concentration in renal failure patients. Because the distribution volume of digoxin is high, it is uncertain whether the repetitive use of this column influences the pharmacokinetics of digoxin in renal failure patients. We have observed 3 renal failure patients whose trough serum digoxin concentrations were significantly reduced by the repetitive use of tandem beta2-microglobulin adsorption columns for treatment of dialysis-related amyloidosis. These patients experienced symptomatic elevation of their heart rates in parallel with a significant reduction in serum digoxin concentrations. Termination of the use of the adsorption column improved the symptoms in 1 patient; however, severe arthritic pain caused by amyloidosis relapsed. Dosage of digoxin was increased in 2 other patients with continuous treatment by the column. Their digoxin concentrations increased, and their heart rates decreased without any deterioration of joint pain. We have demonstrated that the repetitive use of the beta2-microglobulin adsorption column in tandem with standard hemodialysis actually decreases trough digoxin concentration in renal failure patients. Careful monitoring and alteration of digoxin dosage regimens are needed under these circumstances.

Aged↗