Multiple scalp nodules in a patient after craniotomy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The placement of pointed cranial pins into the periosteum is a recognized acute noxious stimulation during intracranial surgery which can result in sudden increases in blood pressure and heart rate, causing increases in intracranial pressure. A skull block (blockade of the nerves that innervate the scalp, including the greater and lesser occipital nerves, the supraorbital and supratrochlear nerves, the auriculotemporal nerves, and the greater auricular nerves) may be effective in reducing hypertension and tachycardia. Twenty-one patients were allocated in a prospective, double-blind fashion to a control group or a bupivacaine group. After a standardized induction and 5 min prior to head pinning, a skull block was performed. Patients in the control group received a skull block of normal saline, while the bupivacaine group received a skull block with 0.5% bupivacaine. Systolic (SAP), diastolic (DAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and end-tidal isoflurane were recorded at the following times: 5 min after the induction of anesthesia, during performance of the skull block, during head pinning, and 5 min after head pinning. Significant increases in SAP of 40 +/- 6 mm Hg, DAP of 30 +/- 5 mm Hg, MAP of 32 +/- 6 mm Hg, and HR of 22 +/- 5 bpm occurred during head pinning in the control group, while remaining unchanged in the bupivacaine group. These results demonstrate that a skull block using 0.5% bupivacaine successfully blunts the hemodynamic response to head pinning.
This prospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of patient-controlled sedation (PCS) using propofol during awake seizure surgery performed under bupivacaine scalp blocks. Thirty-seven patients were randomized to receive either propofol PCS combined with a basal infusion of propofol (n = 20) or neurolept analgesia using an initial bolus dose of fentanyl and droperidol followed by a fentanyl infusion (n = 17). Both groups received supplemental fentanyl and dimenhydrinate for intraoperative pain and nausea, respectively. Comparisons were made between groups for sedation, memory, and cognitive function, patient satisfaction, and incidence of complications. Levels of intraoperative sedation and patient satisfaction were similar between groups. Memory and cognitive function were well preserved in both groups. The incidence of transient episodes of ventilatory rate depression (<8 bpm) was more frequent among the propofol patients (5 vs 0, P = 0.04), particularly after supplemental doses of opioid. Intraoperative seizures were more common among the neurolept patients (7 vs 0, P = 0.002). PCS using propofol represents an effective alternative to neurolept analgesia during awake seizure surgery performed in a monitored care environment.
We compared the efficacy of the combination of enalaprilat/labetalol with that of enalaprilat/nicardipine to prevent emergence postcraniotomy hypertension. A prospective, randomized open labeled clinical trial was designed to compare the incidence of breakthrough hypertension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] > 140 mm Hg) and adverse effects (hypotension, tachycardia, and bradycardia) between the two drug combinations. Secondarily, the effects of the drugs on SBP, mean blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure were evaluated over the course of the study. Forty-two patients received enalaprilat 1.25 mg IV at dural closure followed by either multidose nicardipine 2 mg IV or labetalol 5 mg IV to maintain the SBP below 140 mm Hg. SBP was similarly controlled in both groups. There was a marginally smaller incidence of failures and adverse effects with labetalol. Blood pressure profiles were similar for both groups.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
UNLABELLED: Mild hypothermia may be induced during neurosurgery for brain protection. However, its effect on propofol requirement has not been defined. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that 3 degrees C of core hypothermia decreases the propofol blood concentration at which patients respond to command (CP50-awake) in neurosurgical patients. Forty patients were anesthetized with alfentanil 50 microg/kg i.v., nitrous oxide, propofol target-controlled infusion, and rocuronium. The bispectral index (version 3.12) was monitored continuously. Patients were randomized to a core temperature of 34 degrees C or 37 degrees C. At the end of surgery, neuromuscular blockade was reversed, nitrous oxide was ceased, and propofol was infused to achieve a blood target determined by the previous patient's response. Responsiveness to command was assessed 15 min later. Results were analyzed with logistic regression models; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The CP50-awake of propofol was 3.05 microg/mL (95% confidence interval, 2.34-3.66). Propofol concentration, but not core temperature, predicted loss of response to command (odds ratio, 11.76; 95% confidence interval, 2.40-57.63; P < 0.01). Core temperature did not alter the relationship between bispectral index and response to command. Propofol infusion regimens may not require adjustment during mild hypothermia. IMPLICATIONS: Neurosurgical patients may be allowed to become mildly hypothermic during anesthesia in an effort to provide brain protection. Propofol maintenance infusion doses may not require adjustment in these patients.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.