Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Automobiles”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 667 records · Page 37Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Legionnaires' disease outbreak in an automobile engine manufacturing plant.

We investigated 4 cases of legionnaires' disease (LD) reported among workers at an Ohio automotive plant in March 2001. A "confirmed" case of LD was defined as x-ray-confirmed pneumonia and a confirmatory laboratory test. A "possible" case of LD was defined as elevated titers of antibody and respiratory symptoms. Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 (LP1) was isolated from 1 case patient. Legionella was isolated from 18 (9%) of 197 environmental samples; 3 isolates were LP1 but did not match the case isolate. We conducted a case-control study; 17 case patients with confirmed or possible LD and 86 control subjects (workers with low antibody titers and without symptoms) were enrolled. Visiting a specific cleaning line (odds ratio, [OR], 7.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.31-23.00) and working in the cleaning region of the plant (OR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.11-9.38) were associated with LD. LD can be transmitted in industrial settings in which aerosols are produced. Clinicians should consider LD when treating persons from these settings for pneumonia.

Aerosols↗
PubMed1991

Perceptual dysfunction in hemiplegia and automobile driving.

Sixteen post-stroke, hemiplegic patients, who requested that they be allowed to return to driving, were extensively evaluated by a physiatrist, psychologist, occupational therapist, and driver training specialist. After they completed a driver training program, the patients were divided into three groups based on their driving program success and follow-ups. Significant differences in the psychological test results were found between Group I (those who drove without any difficulty) and Groups II and III (those who drove limited distance or who failed driver training). Results suggest that patients with significant cognitive and perceptual problems who take training and limit their driving can be safe drivers when they return to driving.

Accidents, Traffic↗
PubMed2003

Fatigue, sleep restriction, and performance in automobile drivers: a controlled study in a natural environment.

OBJECTIVES: To test the neurobehavioral consequences of sleep restriction combined with fatigue from long-distance driving (1000 Km/600 miles). DESIGN: Counterbalanced study involving 3 experimental conditions: laboratory after controlled habitual sleep (8.5 hours), driving after controlled habitual sleep (8.5 hours) (Road 1), and driving after reduced sleep (2 hours) (Road 2). SETTING: Sleep laboratory and open French highway. PARTICIPANTS: 10 male participants (mean age 22 years, range 18-24 years, mean driving distance per year 15000 Km/9000 miles) free of sleep disorders. MEASUREMENTS: Simple reaction time, prospective self-assessment of performance, and instantaneous fatigue and sleepiness ratings measured at 2-hour intervals. RESULTS: A two-way repeated ANOVA with time of day and condition indicated a significant main effect for time of day (p < 0.05). The interaction between the two factors (condition * time of day) was also significant (p < 0.05). The effects of time of day were significant only in the condition of driving after sleep restriction, (p < 0.05). Under sleep restriction, some drivers presented an increase of 650 milliseconds compared to the laboratory condition, representing an increase of 23 meters in breaking distance at a speed of 75 miles per hour. Correlation analyses showed a significant linear correlation between self-assessment and reaction time in the laboratory condition (r = -0.58, p < 0.01) but not in the road conditions. Self-ratings during the breaks showed a significant increase in instantaneous self-rated fatigue and sleepiness between Road 1 and Road 2 conditions (Wilcoxon's test, Z = - 6.47, p < 0.0001 and Z = - 6.26, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Sleep restriction combined with fatigue significantly affects reaction time. The lack of correspondence between reaction time and prospective self-evaluation of performance suggests that self-monitoring in real conditions is poorly reliable.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Automobile driving performance of brain-injured patients with visual field defects.

The purpose of this study was to examine whether patients with visual field defects resulting from cerebral injury are handicapped in their driving ability, because visual field loss as assessed in standard perimetry is often the basis for withdrawal of a person's driving license. Driving performance was tested on a driving simulator to obtain standardized results and for safety reasons. The visual field was assessed both with standard automated perimetry and computer-based, high-resolution, qualitative perimetry. We investigated nine patients with purely cerebral field defects (mostly homonymous binocular defects) who had no further neuropsychological or ophthalmological deficits. Their performance (driving speed, reaction time, and driving error rate) was compared with that of a control group of ten subjects. We found no differences in any of the tested parameters between the visually impaired subjects and the normal participants. This suggests that individuals with visual field defects, including those who suffer from homonymous hemianopia, may perform as adequately as normal individuals in realistic driving scenarios. The perimetrically assessed visual field may, thus, be of limited value for the prediction of driving safety, and we conclude that patients who have field defects should not summarily be denied a driving license.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

How to save fuel and reduce injuries in automobiles.

Increased fuel economy and reduced injuries have been portrayed as incompatible goals, based on the false assumption that vehicle weight is the determining factor in both. Physics predicts that size and velocity, not weight, are the primary factors affecting crash forces, while increased weight or increased velocity consumes more fuel. Analysis of fatal injury rates, injury costs, and fuel use relation to vehicle weight, vehicle size, and engine horsepower confirms that weight is of minimal importance in injury severity compared to the other two factors. Fuel use is a function of weight and horsepower. Injuries and fuel use can be reduced by reducing vehicle horsepower without changing vehicle size.

Accidents, Traffic↗
PubMed1978

Night myopia at night automobile luminances: final report.

One-hundred seventy-five persons viewed test letters of 35 and 11% contrast at 0.1 and 0.01 fL chart luminance while lenses (+0.25 to -1.50 D in 0.25-D steps) were placed before their eyes (and glasses, if they wore them). With one or more of the minus lenses, only 9% of the subjects obtained improved acuity by one or more lines on the chart. The most common optimum lens power was -0.75 D.

Adult↗