Extraocular retinoblastoma.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
With the advent of more effective chemotherapy an increasing incidence of central nervous system involvement in acute lymphocyte (ALL) and myelocytic leukemias (AML) and chronic myelocytic leukemia (CML) in blast crisis has become evident. Meningeal involvement in the chronic phase of CML is rare. We report two children whose initial presentation of Ph1 CML was in the central nervous system as documented by cytocentrifugation. Aggressive combination chemotherapy and cranial irradiation has resulted in prolonged survival without blastic transformation or further meningeal disease. An approach to children with CML is suggested.
Hereditary retinoblastoma is an autosomal dominant disorder caused by mutations in the RB1 gene. Analysis of this rare condition has helped to elucidate the mechanisms underlying hereditary cancer predisposition in general. As identification of RB1 gene mutations has become a part of clinical management of patients with retinoblastoma, there is now a wealth of data. In this article, we summarize the current knowledge on the relations between the genotype and phenotypic expression. Moreover, detailed analysis of genotype-phenotype relations shows that hereditary retinoblastoma has features of a complex trait.
BACKGROUND: The current study was performed to evaluate two regimens of treatment and to describe clinical and epidemiologic characteristics in patients with extraocular retinoblastoma. METHODS: Eighty-three patients with extraocular retinoblastoma according to Childrens Cancer Group (CCG) classification were admitted to the Pediatric Department of the A. C. Camargo between 1987-2000. The age, gender, race, lag time, first clinical presentation, staging, laterality, and treatment regimen were analyzed. Treatment was comprised of cisplatin, teniposide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide during the first treatment period (1987-1991) or cisplatin and teniposide with alternating courses of ifosfamide and etoposide during the second treatment period (1992-2000). RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 32.9 months (range, 2-145 months). The mean lag time was 10.5 months. Forty-three patients were treated in the first period and 40 patients were treated in the second period. Locally advanced tumors (Class I-III) were present in 83.1% of the patients. There was a positive correlation between lag time and age for unilateral tumors (correlation coefficient [r] = 0.35; P = 0.006), whereas the correlation was negative for bilateral tumors (r = -0.12; P = 0.63). The 5-year overall survival was 55.1% in the first treatment period and 59.4% in the second treatment period (P = 0.69). No significant differences with regard to survival rates were noted for unilateral tumors between the two treatment periods (44.6 noted for unilateral tumors vs. 59.1 noted for unilateral tumors). CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, the addition of ifosfamide and etoposide to a treatment regimen comprised of cisplatin, teniposide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide did not appear to improve the survival of patients with extraocular retinoblastoma. Patients with dissemination to the central nervous system or metastatic disease remain incurable and die of progressive disease, despite the aggressive treatment. A multicenter trial should be considered to evaluate the best strategy for these situations.
Forty-nine primary retinoblastoma (Rb) tumors were analyzed by the use of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), and clinical/histological correlations were performed. Adverse histological factors were present in 13 patients. Chromosomal imbalance was a frequent phenomenon, seen in 96% of the tumors. Gain of 6p represented the most frequent event (69% of the tumors), whereas +1q was observed in 57%, confirming that these abnormalities are key secondary events in retinoblastoma tumor progression. Loss of 13q and 16 was significantly associated with tumors displaying adverse histo-prognostic factors, whereas -16q was significantly associated with tumors without adverse features. In three patients who developed an extra-ocular relapse, the tumors showed -13q and 2/3 had -5q, suggesting that these abnormalities may be associated with metastasis. Children >or= 36 months of age at enucleation tended to have more CGH abnormalities per tumor than children < 12 months (median numbers 11 vs. 3). In addition, +1q, +13q, -16, and -16q were more frequent in children with an older age at enucleation. Identical CGH changes were found in both tumors from one patient with bilateral tumors, suggesting a common origin. It is possible that tumors displaying loss of 13q and 5q indicate those patients who may suffer an adverse outcome and who would require alternative or more intensive therapy. CGH analysis on larger cohorts and in prospective clinical trials will be invaluable in determining whether a genetic classification of retinoblastoma represents a reliable measure of prognosis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
To identify gene(s) targeted by 6p22 genomic gain, present in more than 50% retinoblastoma tumors, we used real-time RT-PCR to quantify the expression of seven genes in normal human retina and retinoblastoma. Six genes are located in the quantitative multiplex PCR-defined 0.6 Mb minimal region of gain at 6p22 (DEK, AOF1, TPMT, NHLRC1, KIF13A, and NUP153), and E2F3 is 2 Mb away from the minimal region of gain on 6p22. E2F3, DEK, KIF13A, and NUP153 were most frequently overexpressed in retinoblastoma with 6p genomic gain, compared with the normal adult human retina. E2F3 and DEK mRNA levels were increased in all human tumors showing 6p22 gain, as well as in mouse retinoblastoma induced by SV40 large T antigen expression in developing retina, compared with the normal controls (adult human retina and 7-day-old mouse retina, respectively). Only DEK showed statistically significant correlation of expression and genomic copy number (P = 0.019). E2F3 and DEK, but not NUP153, showed developmental regulation. E2F3 and DEK mRNA overexpression was always associated with protein overexpression, determined by immunoblotting or immunofluorescent staining of primary tumors, relative to the adjacent normal retina. E2F3 was strongly expressed in actively proliferating cells, while DEK was overexpressed in all tumor cells. Taking into account the proliferation-promoting role of E2F3, implication of E2F3 in bladder and prostate cancer, and the translocation and overexpression of DEK in leukemia, we conclude that either DEK or E2F3 (or both) are targeted by the 6p22 gain in retinoblastoma.
Loss of both RB1 alleles is rate limiting for development of retinoblastoma (RB), but genomic copy number gain or loss may impact oncogene(s) and tumor suppressor genes, facilitating tumor progression. We used quantitative multiplex polymerase chain reaction to profile "hot spot" genomic copy number changes for gain at 1q32.1, 6p22, and MYCN, and loss at 16q22 in 87 primary RB and 7 cell lines. Loss at 16q22 (48%) negatively associated with MYCN gain (18%) (Fisher's exact P = 0.031), gain at 1q32.1 (62%) positively associated with 6p "hot spot" gain (43%) (P = 0.033), and there was a trend for positive association between 1q and MYCN gain (P = 0.095). Cell lines had a higher frequency of MYCN amplification than primary tumors (29% versus 3%; P = 0.043). Novel high-level amplification of 1q32.1 in one primary tumor, confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization, strongly supports the presence of oncogene(s) in this region, possibly the mitotic kinesin, KIF14. Gene-specific quantitative multiplex polymerase chain reaction of candidate oncogenes at 1q32.1 (KIF14), 6p22 (E2F3 and DEK), and tumor suppressor genes at 16q22 (CDH11) and 17q21 (NGFR) showed the most common gene gains in RB to be KIF14 in cell lines (80%) and E2F3 in primary tumors (70%). The patterns of gain/loss were qualitatively different in 25 RB compared with 12 primary hepatocellular carcinoma and 12 breast cancer cell lines. Gene specific analysis of one bone marrow metastasis of RB, prechemotherapy and postchemotherapy, showed the typical genomic changes of RB pretreatment, which normalized after chemotherapy.
Retinoblastoma (RB) is a neoplasm of retinal origin caused by mutations in RB1, the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor gene. To facilitate genetics counseling and patient management, we adopted a multistep molecular screening assay for detecting RB1 mutations. This assay included DNA sequencing to identify mutations within coding exons and immediate flanking intronic regions, Southern blot analysis to characterize genomic rearrangements, and transcript analysis to characterize potential splicing mutations buried within introns. In a pilot investigation of 180 patients from North America, we identified germline RB1 mutations in 77 out of 85 bilateral RB patients (91%), 7 out of 10 familial unilateral (70%), and 6 out of 85 unilateral patients with no family history of RB (7%). Mutations included 36 novel alterations spanning the entire RB1 gene. Seven of these novel changes were missense or silent mutations. Sequence analysis predicted that, in five out of seven cases, the changes can cause aberrant splicing. This was confirmed by transcript analysis in four out of five cases. In addition, four intronic point mutations within nonconsensus sites activated cryptic splice sites. Without the transcript analysis, the significance of these 11 mutations would have remained undefined. In a separate investigation of a subset of unilateral RB tumors, we identified somatic biallelic RB1 gene inactivation in 34 out of 56 cases (61%) cases. In 14 tumors, only one of the two RB1 mutations could be detected, and in eight tumors, no mutations were detected. The absence of detectable RB1 mutations in eight bilateral cases and eight unilateral tumors suggests that alternative genetic mechanisms may underlie the development of RB in certain individuals.
We studied 50 unrelated pedigrees with a family history of retinoblastoma (Rb) (165 carriers of a RB1 mutation) to delineate the spectrum of RB1 germline mutations in familial Rb and to identify genotype-phenotype correlations as well as putative modifiers. Patients were followed at Institut Curie and they were examined by an ophthalmologist, a pediatrician, and a geneticist. All cases of familial Rb were determined via genetic counseling. Clinical features included disease status, laterality, age at diagnosis, mutation type, follow-up, and disease-eye ratio (DER). To eliminate mosaic cases, first-generation carriers displaying low-penetrance (LP) Rb were excluded from the analysis. Complete penetrance was the rule for nonsense and frameshift mutations (25 families) and high penetrance was observed for large rearrangements (eight families). Promoter (two families) and missense (two families) mutations displayed heterogeneous phenotypes and LP. Variable penetrance was observed for splice abnormalities (13 families) and was explained by in/out of frame mutations or respect of functional domains. Surprisingly, two families with the LP g.45867G>T/IVS6+1G>T mutation presented data that conflicted with the data reported in previous publications, as unaffected carriers had paternally inherited mutant alleles. Moreover, RNA analyses suggested that the lack of penetrance in unaffected carriers could be explained by an increase in expression levels of the wild-type allele. This observation prompted us to define a new class "3" of LP alleles. We believe this is the first large-scale study of familial Rb with a high level of homogeneity in the clinical and genetic analysis of patients and their relatives, thereby allowing for reliable intrafamilial genotype-phenotype correlations. Our analysis suggests in some cases the influence of modifier factors probably involved in mRNA level regulation and/or pRB pathway regulation.
We investigated sequence alternation, promoter methylation, and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the RB1 gene as possible mechanisms of its inactivation in retinoblastoma. In 42 Chinese patients with sporadic retinoblastoma, the promoter and entire coding region of RB1 were examined for sequence changes. Status of methylation of the CpG-rich island at the 5'end was determined by methylation specific PCR assay. We detected 15 RB1 mutations in 38% (16/42) of the retinoblastoma patients, among them 19% (8/42) were germ-line mutations. A total of nine novel mutations were identified: E54X, S114X, I126S, g73779insG, D718N, IVS2+1G>C, IVS14+1G>C, IVS21+1G>C, and a complex alteration g78177G>T/g78176insTT leading to 543X. Most of them are likely to affect the RB1large pocket domain through the production of truncated gene products. None of the DNA samples showed methylation at the RB1promoter. In 15 cases where both normal and cancerous retinoblastoma tissue specimens were available, allelic loss according to microsatellite markers within or distal to the RB1 locus was analyzed and immunohistological staining for RB1 expression performed. Among them, frequency of LOH at 13q14 was found to be high at 60% (9/15) with no segregation with unilateral tumors. All these nine tumors did not express RB1 protein, showing an association of LOH at the RB1 locus with its loss of expression in retinoblastoma. Our results indicate that the RB1 gene in sporadic retinoblastoma is commonly inactivated because of loss-of-function mutations and loss of heterozygosity but not by the epigenetic phenomenon of promoter hypermethylation.
Hereditary predisposition to retinoblastoma is caused by germ line mutations in the RB1 gene. Genetic counseling of affected individuals and accurate risk prediction for their families requires identification of the disease causing mutation. Furthermore, the nature of a mutation can determine genetic penetrance, disease presentation and prognosis. We describe, and functionally characterize here, a novel mutant allele of RB1 present in the germ line of a patient with sporadic bilateral retinoblastoma. The mutation generates an operational splice acceptor site resulting in a predicted protein product with loss of 81 amino acids from its carboxy terminus. We demonstrate that the aberrantly spliced transcript is present in substantial amounts in peripheral blood of the patient and present evidence that the predicted protein product displays partial loss of activity reflecting in degree and presentation that of the partially penetrant RB1 missense mutant R661W. This infers that disease with reduced expressivity and incomplete penetrance may arise in individuals that carry the mutation and predicts such presentation for similar mutations with found in sporadic cases in the past.
Many retinoblastomas (Rbs) show genomic alterations in addition to mutational loss of both normal RB1 alleles. The most frequent of these changes are gains on chromosomes 1q and 6p and losses on 16q. To identify the genes targeted by gains on chromosome 1q, we used quantitative-multiplex PCR to determine DNA copy number changes in 76 primary tumors and 6 Rb cell lines. In addition, in 21 of these tumors, gene expression was analyzed by cDNA microarray hybridization. Increased copy numbers of loci on chromosome 1q were present in 34 (45%) primary tumors and in all 6 cell lines. Two regions of gain emerged, one in 1q32 and another in 1q21. Tumors with 1q gains showed higher RNA expression of several genes in these 2 regions. The clinical manifestation of tumors with and without gains was similar with regard to many aspects, including size, necrosis and calcification. However, the distribution of age at diagnosis was remarkably distinct, with earlier diagnosis in tumors without gains. This suggests that these tumors either are initiated earlier or grow faster than tumors with gains. This association with clinical manifestation indicates that gains on 1q are significant for the biology of Rb. The genes on 1q with copy number gains and overexpression are candidates that need to be tested for their individual contribution to the progression of Rb.
We studied the expression of pro-apoptotic neurotrophin receptor p75 (p75(NTR)) in human and murine retinoblastoma, compared to normal retina, and examined changes in p75(NTR) expression with the onset of apoptosis in the course of murine retinoblastoma progression, using immunohistochemistry and quantitative real-time RT-PCR. The murine retinoblastoma is induced by retinal specific expression of SV40 T-antigen (TAg), which blocks the function of the retinoblastoma protein (pRB) and related proteins, and is a well-studied model that closely simulates human retinoblastoma. The majority of human retinoblastoma either lacked or expressed decreased levels of p75(NTR) mRNA, compared to human retina. Moreover, p75(NTR) protein was not detected in any tumor studied, unlike normal retina. Like human retinoblastoma, advanced murine retinoblastoma did not express p75(NTR). However, before tumors emerged, small clusters of TAg-positive cells coexpressed p75(NTR) and activated caspase-3, a marker of apoptosis. Furthermore, in three rare human eyes containing retinoblastoma adjacent to regions resembling the benign retinal tumor retinoma, both normal retina and retinoma-like tissue expressed p75(NTR) protein, while the retinoblastoma did not. We suggest that p75(NTR) loss accompanies progression from retinoma to retinoblastoma.
BACKGROUND: Genetic testing for inherited predisposition to diverse cancers has recently become available as a clinical service. We conducted a follow-up study of the initial series of US families who underwent RB1 genetic testing to evaluate long-term effects of the service. PROCEDURE: We enrolled 52 of 71 eligible families who responded to a follow-up study questionnaire administered 3-10 years after receipt of their RB1 results. Each family had one proband with unilateral, non-familial retinoblastoma, which is associated with a 12% pre-test probability of hereditary retinoblastoma. RB1 testing identified germline RB1 mutations in five patients, lowered the carrier probability to 2% in 21 patients, and did not substantially modify the carrier probability in the remaining 26. RESULTS: Diverse medical specialists offered and arranged for RB1 testing, and their recommendation was the most influential factor in the decision to be tested. Pre-test counseling was provided by ophthalmologists (30), oncologists (11), and geneticists and genetic counselors (11). Most respondents, regardless of test result, were satisfied and perceived gains from their genetic testing. Based on small numbers, families with reduced likelihood of hereditary retinoblastoma reported more positive outcomes. Parents of RB1 carriers were more likely to seek medical services, worry, and decide against having more children. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of follow-up studies of families who had genetic testing. Results from our small series suggest that genetic information and counseling are important components of RB1 clinical genetic testing, and long-term adverse effects of testing are uncommon.
BACKGROUND: Orbital growth retardation, after enucleation and/or external beam radiation for retinoblastoma (RB), is a serious late effect. We measured orbital volumes of RB survivors treated at Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, between 1980-1998. PROCEDURE: Forty-five orbits of 28 children with RB (17 bilateral, 11 unilateral) were examined. Thirty-six orbits were irradiated, 19 enucleated, and 10 both enucleated and irradiated. The orbital volumes were calculated from a three-dimensional orbital CT reconstruction. The orbits of RB survivors were compared to age-matched controls. RESULTS: The mean age at diagnosis was 13 months, mean follow-up time was 56 months. The mean volume of RB orbits (14.4 cc) was statistically significantly smaller than control orbits (17.8 cc). There was no difference between the mean volume of orbits treated with enucleation, irradiation or both. The orbital volume of children treated before the age of 12 months was statistically significantly smaller than those treated later. There was no difference between mean volume of fellow orbits in unilateral RB and controls. The mean orbital asymmetry index in control children (2.6%) was statistically significantly smaller than in RB survivors (14%). CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant orbital growth retardation after enucleation and/or irradiation for RB. There was no difference between mean orbital volumes after enucleation, radiation or both. Orbital growth retardation was most prominent in children treated in the first year of life. Although small in number, our study suggests that deferring enucleation and/or irradiation until after the age of 12 months may reduce long-term complications.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.