Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Resectable”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 649 records · Page 36Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

[Estimation of hepatic resection volume in hepatocellular carcinoma by ICG(R15) and its relation with postoperative liver failure].

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: It is important to accurately estimate liver reserve function before hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to determine proper hepatic resection volume during operation, thus, to avoid postoperative liver failure. Recently, indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min (ICG(R15)) has been considered as a sensitive marker for liver reserve function. However, how to evaluate the maximal hepatic resection volume according to liver reserve function, especially ICG(R15), remains controversial. This study was to evaluate the influence of ICG(R15) and hepatic resection volume on postoperative liver failure. METHODS: Records of 225 HCC patients who underwent hepatectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative ICG(R15) value, intraoperative hepatic resection volume, and postoperative liver function were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 225 patients, 113 received resection of no more than 1 segment (group A), 76 received resection of 1-2 segments (group B), 36 received resection of more than 2 segments (group C). When ICG(R15) was below 10%, the incidences of postoperative ascites in groups A, B, and C were 21.2% (14/66), 14.3% (8/56), and 15.4% (4/26), respectively (P>0.05); the incidences of jaundice were 3.0% (2/66), 7.1% (4/56), and 15.4% (4/26), respectively (P>0.05). When ICG(R15) was 10%-20%, the incidences of ascites were 26.8% (11/41), 38.9%(7/18), and 50.0% (5/10), respectively (P>0.05); the incidence of jaundice was lower in group A than in group B, and group C [0 (0/41) vs. 27.8% (5/18), and 20.0% (2/10), P<0.01]; 2 patients, who had 2 or 3 segments resected, died of postoperative encephalopathy. When ICG(R15) was more than 20%, ascites occurred in 2 of 6 patients (33.3%) in group Au both of the 2 cases in group B developed postoperative ascites and jaundice, and 1 died. CONCLUSIONS: When ICG(R15) is below 10%, 2 or more segments can be resected safely when ICG(R15) is 10%-20%, 1 segment can be resected safely, 2 or more segments may be resected with great care when ICG(R15) is more than 20%, the patient's general condition and other liver function tests should be taken into consideration if 1 segment is resected, resection of 2 or more segments will cause high surgical risk.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

[Comparison of effects of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection on small hepatocellular carcinoma].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) and surgical resection as an initial treatment for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Between March 2000 and June 2003, 112 patients with small HCC (with single nodule less than 5 cm in diameter) were divided at random into two groups: resection group (n = 65) and PRFA group (n = 47) to undergo surgical resection or PRFA respectively. RESULTS: The 1-, 2- and 3-year recurrence rates were 10.7%, 18.4%, and 24.6% respectively in the 65 patients of the resection group and were 8.5%, 19.1%, and 23.4% respectively in the 47 patients of the PRFA group. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 93.18%, 85.69%, and 67.26% respectively in the 65 patients of the resection group and were 92.79%, 82.03%, and 64.46% respectively in the 47 patients of the PRFA group (P = 0.7534). The 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates of the patients with tumor less than 3 cm in diameter were slightly higher in the PRFA group than in the resection group, however, insignificantly (P = 0.1253). The 1-, 2- and 3- year survival rates of the patients with tumor 3.1 to 5 cm in diameter were higher in the resection group than in the PRFA group, however, insignificantly (P = 0.4617). The 1, 2, and 3-year survival rates of the patients at stage Ia were slightly higher in the PRFA group than in the resection group, however, insignificantly (P = 0.1253). The 1, 2, and 3-year survival rates of the patients at stage Ib were slightly higher in the resection group than in the PRFA group, however, insignificantly (P = 0.4617). CONCLUSION: PRFA treatment is a less invasive form of treatment for small HCC than surgical resection and is equally effective as the more invasive surgical resection. PRFA is superior to surgical resection when used in the treatment of patients with HCC less than 3 cm in diameter. PRFA can be used instead of surgical resection in proper situations.

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Factors associated with complications of open versus laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND: This study critically reviews sigmoid colon resection for diverticulitis comparing open and laparoscopic techniques. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all open and laparoscopic cases of diverticulitis between 1992 and 2001. Data analyzed included the following: indications for operation, postoperative complications, and incidence of laparoscopic conversion to laparotomy. Major and minor complications were analyzed in relation to patients' preoperative diagnosis, age, presence or absence of splenic flexure mobilization, length of stay, and laparoscopic sigmoid resection versus open sigmoid resection. RESULTS: Over a 10-year period, 166 resections for diverticulitis were performed including 126 open cases and 40 laparoscopic cases. No significant differences existed in patient characteristics between the groups. Major complications occurred in 14% of patients, and the laparoscopic conversion rate was 20%. The presence of abscess, fistula, or stricture preoperatively was associated with a higher complication rate only in patients > or =50 years old undergoing open sigmoid resection. The length of stay between patients undergoing laparoscopic resection was significantly less than in patients having open resection. CONCLUSION: Advanced laparoscopic sigmoid resection is an alternative to open sigmoid resection in patients with diverticulitis and its complications. Open sigmoid resection in patients >50 years may have a higher complication rate in complicated diverticulitis when compared with laparoscopic sigmoid resection (all patient ages) and open sigmoid resection (patients <50 years old). Regarding complications, no difference existed between the length of stay in patients with open vs. laparoscopic resection.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Carcinoma of the pancreas with portal vein involvement--our experience with a modified technique of resection.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Up to 40% of the patients with pancreatic carcinoma are not fit for curative resection due to the locally advanced nature of the disease in the form of vascular involvement. In recent years a more aggressive approach of vascular resection with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has resulted in the increase in resectability rate and survival in this group of patients. The most important determinant of survival in these patients is negative resection margins. The aim of the present study is to present our experience of vascular resection using a modified technique, in patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODOLOGY: This is a retrospective study of 48 patients who underwent portal vein/superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) resection along with PD using the modified technique of resection, during 1982-2004. The principle modification is the initial extensive retroperitoneal dissection for the assessment of the extent of tumor involvement of the superior mesenteric vessels and division of retroperitoneal margin before the division of the pancreas. All patients also underwent extended lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: The subtotal PD was done in 26 and total PD in 22 patients, with resection of the PV/SMV in all of them. The end-to-end anastomosis was possible after adequate mobilization of the PV and SMV in 40 patients. In 4 patients reconstruction was able to be done with the use of a graft. The portal vein occlusion time was 8-15 minutes. Histopathological examination showed negative margins in all the resected specimens. Postoperative complications occurred in 16.66% with reoperation rate of 8.33%, and mortality of 6.25%. After a mean follow-up of 110 months, mean survival was 40 months with the range of 18-250 months. The five-year and 10-year survival was 18% and 10% respectively. The venous patency rate was 100% at three years. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, PD with en bloc resection of the PV/SMV confluence can safely be done with morbidity and mortality similar to that of standard PD. The survival advantage is directly related to the attainment of negative resection margins. The modified technique is a useful way of doing vascular resection with the least amount of bowel congestion and securing negative resection margins.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Surgical resection of liver metastases from colo-rectal cancers.

Surgical resection is currently the only potentially curative treatment in some selected patients with colo-rectal liver metastases (LM). Unfortunately only a minority of patients are candidates for resection. Only solitary or unilobar LM that can be removed by partial liver resection, are considered to be resectable. The second condition for the resection of LM is that the primary cancer must be resected. The third condition for resection is that the patient must be able to undergo a major liver resection if it is necessary. Small metastases which do not exceed 5 cm, and appear on the surface of the liver can be removed by a simple wedge resection. If the tumor is larger than 5 cm, or if multiple unilobar nodules are discovered, a major liver resection becomes necessary. Hospital mortality does not exceed 5% in most published series. Five year survivals are very rare when histologically proven colo-rectal LM are left in place. After surgical resection of LM, five year survival rates are close to 25% and range from 18% to 52%. Surgical resection is of benefit to approximately one fourth of the patients, who survive five years or more, but three fourths of the patients have early recurrences. None of the studied criteria can predict which patients will benefit from surgical resection of LM. In order to try to reduce the rate of early recurrences adjuvant chemotherapy has been proposed. No positive data have yet been obtained.

Colonic Neoplasms↗
PubMed1985

[Resection with preservation of the lower limb in chondrosarcoma of the pelvis].

Twenty-seven chondrosarcomata of the pelvis were treated by local resection with preservation of the limb. Twenty-two were grade I or II, and 5 were grade III or IV. Attention is drawn to the importance of tomodensitometry in assessing the extent of the tumor before operation. An en bloc resection was well wide of the tumour in 16 cases, close to the tumour in 10 cases and involved the tumour in one case. Post-operative complications were varied. There were 6 nerve paralyses after iliac resection, 3 cases of sepsis after resection of the anterior part of the pelvic ring, and 3 cases of sepsis and 2 vascular complications after peri-acetabular resections. The average follow-up was 5 years. Three had metastases and three had local recurrences, one of whom died later from pulmonary metastases. No local recuRrence was seen in cases with wide resection. The functional results were satisfactory in 6 out of 7 partial resections of the ilium and in 4 out of 5 resections of the anterior part of the pelvic ring. They were only fair after peri-acetabular resections and complete resections of the ilium. After peri-acetabular resections, the results were about the same after ilio-femoral arthrodesis or Girdlestone operations. It is not appropriate to reconstruct the pelvic ring after resection limited to the anterior part of the pelvis but it is indicated after resections of the whole of the ilium, particularly in children to avoid shortening of the limb with pelvic shift.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Gastrectomy with combined resection of other organs for carcinoma of the stomach with invasion to adjacent organs: clinical efficacy in a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Carcinoma of the stomach invading one or more adjacent organs raises serious concerns over en bloc dissection because en bloc resection has an associated high risk and such advanced carcinoma is frequently associated with incurable factors. Thus, it is important to understand the efficacy of gastrectomy combined with other organ resection and to refine the indications for en bloc dissection. STUDY DESIGN: Seventy-seven patients with carcinoma of the stomach directly invading adjacent organs or structures were analyzed retrospectively to investigate the efficacy of en bloc resection. Forty-one patients underwent gastrectomy combined with resection of one or more invaded organs (combined resection group), while the other 36 patients underwent gastrectomy with palliative abrasion between the primary tumor and the invasion site (noncombined resection group). RESULTS: The five-year survival rate was 23 percent in the combined resection group and 0 percent in the noncombined resection group (p < .05). The 23 curative cases and 18 noncurative cases in the combined resection group had a survival rate of 41 percent and 0 percent, respectively (p < .05). The survival rate after a single organ resection was 29 percent, and after a multiple organ resection, 0 percent (p < .05). Cases of carcinoma invading either the pancreas or mesocolon had a slightly but not significantly better prognosis. In Borrmann type IV carcinoma there was no difference in survival between the curative and noncurative operation. Cases with P1 dissemination had a better prognosis than those of P2 and P3 dissemination. CONCLUSIONS: The best indication for an en bloc combined organ resection was an invasion limited to only one other organ, not more than N2, no incurable factor, and any type except Borrmann type IV. Additionally, an en bloc combined resection would be worth trying for any type of gastric carcinoma with not more than P1 dissemination and with no other incurable factor.

Carcinoma↗
PubMed1998

Anatomically based patellar resection criteria for total knee arthroplasty.

Thirty-six patellae were used to geometrically assess anatomically based patellar resection criteria for total knee arthroplasty. The plane of resection was defined in the coronal plane by three distinct anatomic landmarks on the undersurface of the patella: the medial and lateral edges of the quadriceps tendon insertion and the lateral edge of the patellar ligament insertion. The depth of the resection plane is defined by the anatomic landmark points approximately 1 mm posterior to the posterior aspect of the superior and inferior ligament insertions. Following resection, the resected patellae were geometrically characterized using two dimensional rectangular Cartesian coordinate system. The anatomically based patellar resection yielded a simple, consistent, and reliable method for patellar resection for total knee arthroplasty. The proportionate geometric characteristics of both the remaining anterior piece and the resected posterior piece were remarkably uniform. Following resection, the remaining patellar thickness was 65.6+/-5.3% (mean+/-SD) of the original thickness. The maximum width to height ratio of the resected surface was approximately 1:1. The thickness to diameter ratio of the resected portion of the patella was approximately 1:5. The apex of the patella was slightly off to the medial-distal quadrant from the geometric center of the resected surface. The results of this study indicate that anatomically based patellar resection criteria may help reduce the surgical variations associated with patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasties with dome-shaped prostheses.

Anthropometry↗
PubMed2003

Perioperative and long-term outcome of major hepatic resection for small solitary hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis.

HYPOTHESIS: Major hepatic resection is safe and provides favorable long-term survival for cirrhotic patients with a small solitary hepatocellular carcinoma. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: From January 1, 1989, to December 31, 2001, 218 cirrhotic patients with a solitary hepatocellular carcinoma 5 cm or less in diameter underwent either a major hepatic resection (n = 84) or a minor hepatic resection (n = 134). MAJOR OUTCOME MEASURES: Perioperative morbidity and mortality, and long-term survival rates. RESULTS: The major resection group had significantly larger tumors (median, 3.5 vs 2.5 cm; P<.001) and better liver function (median indocyanine green retention at 15 minutes, 9.3% vs 12.9%; P<.001) than the minor resection group. Postoperative morbidity (46.4% vs 39.6%) and mortality (8.3% vs 3.0%) were higher in the major resection group than in the minor resection group, but the differences did not reach statistical significance (P =.32 and P =.11, respectively). The median overall survival did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (102.0 vs 72.3 months; P =.25). However, the median disease-free survival in the major resection group was significantly better than that in the minor resection group (59.0 vs 29.5 months; P =.03). On further subgroup analysis, both disease-free and overall survival rates were significantly better in the major hepatic resection group for tumors of 3 to 5 cm. CONCLUSION: In well-selected cirrhotic patients with a small, solitary hepatocellular carcinoma, major hepatic resection is safe and may offer a better long-term survival over minor hepatic resection for patients with tumors of 3 to 5 cm.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Extended lymphadenectomy and vein resection for pancreatic head cancer: outcomes and implications for therapy.

HYPOTHESIS: An aggressive strategy that includes extended lymphadenectomy and vein resection may improve the results of surgical treatment of pancreatic head cancer. DESIGN: Nonrandomized control trial. SETTING: Tertiary care referral center. PATIENTS: The study included 149 consecutive patients undergoing macroscopically curative resection for periampullary adenocarcinoma from January 1, 1988, to December 31, 1998. INTERVENTIONS: A standard resection was performed in 122 cases; an extended lymphadenectomy in 37. Twenty-four patients underwent venous resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data on surgical mortality, morbidity, and postoperative outcome, pathological findings, and long-term survival were analyzed. RESULTS: In-hospital and 60-day operative mortality was 5.4%. Morbidity was 37.5%. Mortality, morbidity, and postoperative stay were nonsignificantly modified by extended lymphadenectomy or venous resection. Extended resection permitted the identification of a significantly higher percentage of nodal metastases beyond the peripancreatic node groups. In patients undergoing vein resection, a significantly higher rate of positive retroperitoneal margin was found. In the 100 patients with ductal adenocarcinoma, the median overall survival and the 5-year actuarial survival rate were 15 months and 8.4%, respectively. A trend toward a better survival was observed in the first 2 years after operation in the extended resection group compared with the standard resection group. Nodal status was the most powerful predictor of overall survival by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Extended lymphadenectomy and vein resection did not adversely affect postoperative mortality and morbidity. Patients who required a vein resection were less likely to receive a microscopically curative pancreatectomy. Extended resection permitted better pathological staging and was associated with an early advantage in survival, but long-term survival was possible only in patients with favorable prognostic factors.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1998

Resection of hepatic and pulmonary metastases in patients with colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection of hepatic or pulmonary metastases has been accepted as appropriate therapy. However, whether aggressive surgery of both hepatic and pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma is of value has not been verified in detail. METHODS: The authors identified 156 patients who had undergone hepatic resection for colorectal carcinoma metastases. This study reviewed six of these patients who underwent resection of both hepatic and pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma. RESULTS: Five of the patients included four who underwent pulmonary resection for pulmonary metastases after initial hepatic resection for hepatic metastases and one patient who underwent hepatic metastasis resection after initial pulmonary metastasis resection. One additional patient underwent a simultaneous resection of hepatic and pulmonary metastases. The median interval between the 2 resections was 23 months. The median follow-up was 32 months after the second resection. At the time of last follow-up, 4 patients were alive and free of recurrent disease at 6, 7, 38, and 64 months, respectively, after their second resection. The remaining 2 patients died of disease at 17 and 32 months, respectively, after the second surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study suggest that hepatic and pulmonary resection can result in long term survival in select patients with hepatic and pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma because surgery remains the only potentially curative treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Combined colon and hepatic resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The surgical strategy for the treatment of resectable synchronous hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer remains controversial. This study was performed to assess the outcome of combined resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases. METHODS: The perioperative data, morbidity, and survival of the patients who underwent combined colon and liver resections for synchronous colorectal liver metastases from 1988 to 1999 were compared to the parameters of the patients who underwent colon resection followed by resection of liver metastases in a staged setting. RESULTS: 198 hepatic resections were performed, of which 112 procedures in 103 patients were done for metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Twenty six patients (25%) had combined hepatic and colon resection and were compared to 86 patients with metachronous metastases who underwent colon and hepatic resection in the staging setting. Postoperative morbidity was 27 and 35%, respectively. There was no hospital mortality in the combined group vs. 2.3% in the staged group. Blood loss, intensive care unit (ICU) stay and length of postoperative stay (LOS) were similar in both groups. The 5 years cumulative survival of the group after combined surgery was 28% vs. 27% of the group after isolated hepatic resections (P = 0.21). CONCLUSION: Combined colon and hepatic resection is a safe and efficient procedure for the treatment of synchronous colorectal liver metastases. It can be performed with acceptable morbidity and no perioperative mortality. The survival after combined procedure is comparable to the one achieved after staged procedure of colon resection followed by liver resection.

Adult↗
PubMed2007

Chemotherapy for colorectal cancer prior to liver resection for colorectal cancer hepatic metastases does not adversely affect peri-operative outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Systemic chemotherapy is being used increasingly in patients with colorectal cancer. The effects of prior systemic adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy on morbidity following hepatic resection for metastases are not well defined. OBJECTIVES: To assess the peri-operative impact of systemic chemotherapy on liver resection for colorectal cancer hepatic metastases. METHODS: Ninety-six resections for colorectal cancer hepatic metastases performed from July 2001 to July 2003 (93% > or =2 segments) were reviewed. Pre-operative demographics, peri-operative features, and post-operative outcomes were collected prospectively. Type of chemotherapy and the temporal relationship of chemotherapy to the liver resection were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-three of 96 patients (55%) received a mean of 5.7 cycles (6.1 months) of systemic chemotherapy prior to hepatic resection, with a median interval of 12 months from end of chemotherapy to liver resection (range 1-75 months). Thirty-five received 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) alone, nine had irinotecan (CPT-11) in addition to 5-FU/LV, and nine were not specified. Pre-operative age, sex, co-morbidities, ASA score, biochemical and liver enzyme profiles, tumor number, and extent and technique of hepatic resection were the same in the chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy cohorts. Mean tumor size was smaller (4.5 cm vs. 5.8 cm) and synchronous metastases were half as common (25% vs. 49%) in the chemotherapy group. Liver resection operative time was equivalent (270 min) in the two groups. Higher estimated blood loss (EBL) (1,000 ml vs. 850 ml), but fewer transfusions (23% vs. 15%) were associated with the chemotherapy group. Although not statistically significant, post-operative liver enzyme peaks were higher in the chemotherapy group (AST = 402 U/L vs. 302 U/L, P = 0.09 and ALT = 433 U/L vs. 312 U/L, P = 0.1). Peak changes in INR and serum bilirubin did not differ. Complications and length of stay (LOS) did not differ between the groups. The only post-operative death was in the non-chemotherapy group. Interestingly, hepatic steatosis was present in 28% of the non-chemotherapy cases and 57% of the chemotherapy resection specimens (P = 0.005) and was marked (>30%) in 7% and 10%, respectively. Further analysis of the chemotherapy group based on the interval between completion of chemotherapy and the hepatic resection (<6 months, 7-12 months, 1-2 years, and >2 years) revealed a trend towards worse outcomes in most categories for those in the >2 years cohort. When comparing the 5-FU/LV alone, to the CPT-11 group there were no significant differences except higher intra-operative blood loss in the group receiving 5-FU/LV alone (1,295 ml vs. 756 ml, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Despite variations in biochemical function and hepatic steatosis, short-term clinical outcomes are not affected by the administration of chemotherapy prior to hepatic resection. Furthermore, there is no detrimental effect of close timing of chemotherapy prior to resection, and there are no appreciable differences between irinotecan containing regimes and more traditional 5-FU-only based therapies, although the subset sample sizes were small in this study.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1996

Effect of extent of resection on intestinal muscle adaptation.

The response of intestinal muscle to resection has received less attention than mucosal adaptation but may be important in relation to altered motility and improved intestinal absorption. Our aim was to determine the effect of extent of resection on intestinal muscle adaptation. Distal resections of 25% (n = 5), 50% (n = 5), and 75% (n = 5) of the intestine were performed. Transverse intestinal sections were taken at resection and 12 weeks later to evaluate changes in mucosa and circular and longitudinal muscle thickness. Muscle cell number and size and muscle length were also measured. Mucosal thickness increased (P < 0.05) after all resections, (1007 +/- 253 microns vs 1259 +/- 181 microns, 25%; 1019 +/- 191 microns vs 1366 +/- 293 microns, 50%; and 927 +/- 88 microns vs 1432 +/- 213 microns, 75%). Longitudinal muscle thickness (169 +/- 35 microns vs 254 +/- 45 microns, 50%; 207 +/- 71 microns vs 353 +/- 103 microns, 75%) and length (180 +/- 10 cm vs 203 +/- 16 cm, 50%; 90 +/- 16 cm vs 110 +/- 21 cm, 75%) increased (P < 0.05) following 50% and 75% resections but not after a 25% resection. Circular muscle length increased after 75% resection alone (4.4 +/- 0.2 cm vs 5.8 +/- 0.4 cm, P < 0.05). There was no significant change in circular muscle thickness after any resection. Muscle cell size and number per unit area were unchanged in all groups. We concluded that: (1) Intestinal muscle adapts after intestinal resection and this response is related to the extent of resection; in contrast, mucosal adaptation was evident following even the least extensive resection. (2) Increased thickness and length of the longitudinal muscle layer are the most prominent changes. (3) This increased muscle thickness results from hyperplasia rather than hypertrophy.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Resection of synchronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Whereas resection for metachronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer is considered to be a potentially curative approach, little is known about the prognosis after resection of synchronous liver metastases. In the past, these patients usually underwent only palliative therapy. Therefore, we have analyzed the data of 36 patients who underwent curative hepatic resection of synchronous liver metastases from colorectal carcinomas from 1977 to 1987 at the Department of Surgery, Hannover Medical School. In 19 patients, liver resection was combined with colonic resection; in the other 17 patients, hepatic resection was performed after a median interval of 2 months following resection of the primary tumor. No operative mortality was observed in either of the approaches. The median survival time was 28 months for all patients with a median recurrence-free interval of 13.5 months. Overall 5-year survival probability for all patients was 20%. There were no significant differences observed between immediate or delayed liver resection (median survival 18 months versus 31 months). Survival rates were not different after resection of solitary versus multiple liver metastases (26 versus 28 months). Twenty-one of the 36 patients had a recurrence of their liver metastases. In 7 of them, curative liver resection could be performed again. These 7 patients had a significantly improved survival (p less than 0.05) compared to the residual 14 patients. It is concluded that patients with synchronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer may profit from resection of the primary tumor and liver metastases. Timing of liver resection--immediate versus delayed--obviously has no impact on survival rates.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Pelvic resection of recurrent rectal cancer: technical considerations and outcomes.

PURPOSE: Pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer is an ominous event for the patient and a formidable challenge to the managing surgeon. We reviewed the results of abdominosacral resection to manage these patients and correlated outcome (survival and recurrence) with known prognostic factors. METHODS: An abdominosacral resection was performed on 61 patients with pelvic recurrence (53 with curative intent and 6 for palliation; 2 had extended pelvic resection). Of the 53 patients (32 males; average age, 59 years) previous resection included abdominoperineal resection in 27 patients, abdominoperineal resection plus hepatic lobectomy in 2 patients, low anterior resection in 19 patients, plus trisegmentectomy in 1 patient, and advanced primary cancers in 4 patients. Initial primary stage was Dukes B (64 percent) and Dukes C (36 percent). All had been irradiated (3,000-6,500 in 50 patients, 8,300 and 11,000 in 2 patients, and unknown dose in 3 patients). Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen was elevated (>5 ng/ml) in 54 percent. Extent of resection: high sacral resection S-1-S2 was done in 32 patients, midsacrum in 14 patients, and low S-4-S-5 in 6 patients. Twenty-eight patients (60 percent) required partial or complete bladder resection with or without adjacent viscera, and all had internal iliac and obturator node dissection. RESULTS: There were four postoperative (within 60 days) deaths, 8 percent in curative groups (5.4 percent overall). Major complications included prolonged intubation (20 percent), sepsis (34 percent), posterior wound infection or flap separation (38 percent). The survival rate in the curative group (49 postoperative survivors) was 31 percent at five years, with 13 patients surviving beyond five years. Seven of these patients survived from 5 to 21 years, whereas six patients recurred again and died within 5.5 to 7.5 years after abdominosacral resection. Disease-free survival rate at five years was 23 percent. Recent reconstruction with large composite myocutaneous gluteal flaps in 5 patients permitted complete sacral wound coverage, resulting in earlier ambulation and reduced hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominosacral resection permits removal of pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer that is fixed to the sacrum and is associated with long-term survival in 31 percent of patients. Recent technical advances have improved the short-term outcome and have made the procedure more feasible for surgical teams familiar with these techniques.

Abdomen↗
PubMed1998

Prospective multicenter study of the quality of oncologic resections in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer. The Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer is currently under discussion. Results of large, randomized studies will not be available for a number of years yet. This study analyses the results of such resections in consecutive patients operated on by unselected surgeons. METHODS: A prospective, observational, multicenter study was initiated on August 1, 1995, in the German-speaking countries of Europe. One year after initiation of the study, findings are presented with respect to the quality of oncologic resections. RESULTS: Of 500 operations, 231 (46 percent) were performed for cancer, 167 (33 percent) with a curative intent. The most common curative resections were as follows: 63 anterior rectum resections (38 percent), 51 sigmoid resections (30 percent), and 27 abdominoperineal resections (16 percent). Segmental resections were performed in 20 patients (12 percent). Intraoperative tumor spillage was reported in 2 percent. Mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 13 (confidence interval, 5-95 percent; range, 11.5-14.6) and positive lymph nodes harvested was 2.2 (confidence interval, 5-95 percent; range, 0.9-3.4). Significant differences were noted between participating centers in terms of number of lymph nodes resected (P < 0.0001). Distal and proximal resection margins were tumor-free in every case. Lateral margins were tumor free when examined. In the case of 63 curative anterior resections, the mean distal resection margin was 39 (confidence interval, 5-95 percent; range, 33-45) mm, and in 8 of these resections, it was less than 20 min. Mean blood loss was 344 (confidence interval, 5-95 percent; 292-396) ml, and 21 percent of patients received blood transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: These data document that the average quality of laparoscopic colorectal procedures for cancer is satisfactory but differs among surgeons.

Aged↗
PubMed1988

Resection of the liver for colorectal carcinoma metastases. A multi-institutional study of long-term survivors.

In this review of a collected series of patients undergoing hepatic resection for colorectal metastases, 100 patients were found to have survived greater than five years from the time of resection. Of these 100 long-term survivors, 71 remain disease-free through the last follow-up, 19 recurred prior to five years, and ten recurred after five years. Patient characteristics that may have contributed to survival were examined. Procedures performed included five trisegmentectomies, 32 lobectomies, 16 left lateral segmentectomies, and 45 wedge resections. The margin of resection was recorded in 27 patients, one of whom had a positive margin, nine of whom had a less than or equal to 1-cm margin, and 17 of whom had a greater than 1-cm margin. Eighty-one patients had a solitary metastasis to the liver, 11 patients had two metastases, one patient had three metastases, and four patients had four metastases. Thirty patients had Stage C primary carcinoma, 40 had Stage B primary carcinoma, and one had Stage A primary carcinoma. The disease-free interval from the time of colon resection to the time of liver resection was less than one year in 65 patients, and greater than one year in 34 patients. Three patients had bilobar metastases. Four of the patients had extrahepatic disease resected simultaneously with the liver resection. Though several contraindications to hepatic resection have been proposed in the past, five-year survival has been found in patients with extrahepatic disease resected simultaneously, patients with bilobar metastases, patients with multiple metastases, and patients with positive margins. Five-year disease-free survivors are also present in each of these subsets. It is concluded that five-year survival is possible in the presence of reported contraindications to resection, and therefore that the decision to resect the liver must be individualized.

Adult↗