Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “REPRESSION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 649 records · Page 36Linked to original sources

Repression of Teashirt marks the initiation of wing development.

The wing imaginal disc comprises the primordia of the adult wing and the dorsal thoracic body wall. During second larval instar, the wing disc is subdivided into distinct domains that correspond to the presumptive wing and body wall. Early activity of the signaling protein Wingless has been implicated in the specification of the wing primordium. Wingless mutants can produce animals in which the wing is replaced by a duplication of thoracic structures. Specification of wing fate has been visualized by expression of the POU-homeodomain protein Nubbin in the presumptive wing territory and by repression of the homeodomain protein Homothorax. We report that repression of the zinc-finger transcription factor Teashirt (Tsh) is the earliest event in wing specification. Repression of Tsh by the combined action of Wingless and Decapentaplegic is required for wing pouch formation and for subsequent repression of Hth. Thus, repression of Tsh defines the presumptive wing earlier in development than repression of Hth, which must therefore be considered a secondary event.

Animals↗

Changes in histone synthesis and modification at the beginning of mouse development correlate with the establishment of chromatin mediated repression of transcription.

The transition from a late 1-cell mouse embryo to a 4-cell embryo, the period when zygotic gene expression begins, is accompanied by an increasing ability to repress the activities of promoters and replication origins. Since this repression can be relieved by either butyrate or enhancers, it appears to be mediated through chromatin structure. Here we identify changes in the synthesis and modification of chromatin bound histones that are consistent with this hypothesis. Oocytes, which can repress promoter activity, synthesized a full complement of histones, and histone synthesis up to the early 2-cell stage originated from mRNA inherited from the oocyte. However, while histones H3 and H4 continued to be synthesized in early 1-cell embryos, synthesis of histones H2A, H2B and H1 (proteins required for chromatin condensation) was delayed until the late 1-cell stage, reaching their maximum rate in early 2-cell embryos. Moreover, histone H4 in both 1-cell and 2-cell embryos was predominantly diacetylated (a modification that facilitates transcription). Deacetylation towards the unacetylated and monoacetylated H4 population in fibroblasts began at the late 2-cell to 4-cell stage. Arresting development at the beginning of S-phase in 1-cell embryos prevented both the appearance of chromatin-mediated repression of transcription in paternal pronuclei and synthesis of new histones. These changes correlated with the establishment of chromatin-mediated repression during formation of a 2-cell embryo, and the increase in repression from the 2-cell to 4-cell stage as linker histone H1 accumulates and core histones are deacetylated.

Acetylation↗

Induction of repressible acid phosphatase by unsaturated fatty acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

We studied the induction of acid phosphatase (APase) by fatty acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. S. cerevisiae has two types of APase: constitutive and repressible enzymes. The synthesis of the latter APase is normally derepressed by depletion of inorganic phosphate (Pi) in the incubation medium. Of the saturated and unsaturated fatty acids tested, linoleic, linolenic and arachidonic acids induced the synthesis of APase even in the presence of a high concentration of Pi, whereas palmitic, stearic and oleic acids did not. De novo protein synthesis but not stimulation of secretion of the enzyme was required for the induction. Genetic analyses using plasmids carrying the genes, PHO5 and PHO3, that code for repressible APase and constitutive APase, respectively, showed that linolenic acid induced the formation of repressible APase. Linolenic acid inhibited the uptake of exogenous 32Pi and simultaneously lowered the intracellular level of Pi. These circumstances indicate that linolenic acid-induced derepression of repressible APase is primarily caused by a fall in the intracellular level of Pi. However, cells that had been preincubated in the presence of a high concentration of Pi produced APase shortly after the addition of linolenic acid. It is, therefore, suggested that, as well as a normal regulatory mechanism for derepression of repressible APase, a mechanism independent of the external level of Pi participates in the induction of repressible APase by linolenic acid.

Acid Phosphatase↗

Exon repression by polypyrimidine tract binding protein.

Polypyrimidine tract binding protein (PTB) is known to silence the splicing of many alternative exons. However, exons repressed by PTB are affected by other RNA regulatory elements and proteins. This makes it difficult to dissect the structure of the pre-mRNP complexes that silence splicing, and to understand the role of PTB in this process. We determined the minimal requirements for PTB-mediated splicing repression. We find that the minimal sequence for high affinity binding by PTB is relatively large, containing multiple polypyrimidine elements. Analytical ultracentrifugation and proteolysis mapping of RNA cross-links on the PTB protein indicate that most PTB exists as a monomer, and that a polypyrimidine element extends across multiple PTB domains. The high affinity site is bound initially by a PTB monomer and at higher concentrations by additional PTB molecules. Significantly, this site is not sufficient for splicing repression when placed in the 3' splice site of a strong test exon. Efficient repression requires a second binding site within the exon itself or downstream from it. This second site enhances formation of a multimeric PTB complex, even if it does not bind well to PTB on its own. These experiments show that PTB can be sufficient to repress splicing of an otherwise constitutive exon, without binding sites for additional regulatory proteins and without competing with U2AF binding. The minimal complex mediating splicing repression by PTB requires two binding sites bound by an oligomeric PTB complex.

Alternative Splicing↗

Catabolite repression of the xylanase gene (xynA) expression in Bacillus stearothermophilus no. 236 and B. subtilis.

Catabolite repression of the Bacillus stearothermophilus No. 236 xynA gene, encoding an extracellular xylanase, was investigated in this work. Expression of the xynA gene in the B. stearothermophilus strain was found to be subject to glucose catabolite repression, and the level of repression was about 50-fold when the relative amounts of xynA transcript synthesized on different carbon sources were analyzed. The experiments with the B. subtilis MW15 strains carrying plasmids containing the xynA::aprA fusion gene showed that the cloned xynA gene did not require any specific carbon source for its induction. Nevertheless, the expression of the cloned gene was repressed by the presence of glucose. From the nucleotide sequence of the cloned xynA gene, we found two potential catabolite responsive elements (cre) within its reading frame region (cre-1: nucleotides +160 to +173 and cre-2: +173 to +186). Furthermore, by using various deletion derivatives of the xynA::aprA fusion plasmid (pMGW23), we suggested that only the cre-2 element might play a role in the glucose catabolite repression. Repression level of the xynA gene expression in the recombinant B. subtilis strain was estimated to be about 3-fold by analysis of the amounts of xynA transcript.

Bacillus subtilis↗

Ubc9 interacts with chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor I and represses receptor-dependent transcription.

Chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factors (COUP-TFs) are orphan receptors involved in regulation of neurogenesis and organogenesis. COUP-TF family members are generally considered to be transcriptional repressors and several mechanisms have been proposed to underlie this activity. To explore novel transcriptional coregulators for COUP-TFs, we used the COUP-TFI as bait in a yeast two-hybrid screen of an adrenocortical adenoma cDNA library. We have identified Ubc9, a class E2 conjugating enzyme of small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO)-1 as a COUP-TFI corepressor. Ubc9 interacts with COUP-TFI in yeast and in glutathione S-transferase pulldown and coimmunoprecipitation assays. Fluorescence imaging studies show that both Ubc9 and COUP-TFI are colocalized in the nuclei of transfected COS-1 cells. The C-terminal region of Ubc9 encoding amino acids 59-158 interacts with the C-terminus of COUP-TFI encoding amino acids 383-403, in which transcriptional repression domains are located. Mammalian one-hybrid assays utilizing a variety of Ubc9 fragments fused to Gal4 DNA-binding domain show that a Ubc9 fragment encoding amino acids 1-89 contains autonomous transferrable repression domain. Transfection of Ubc9 into COS-1 cells markedly enhances transcriptional repression by Gal4 DNA-binding domain-fused to COUP-TFI(155-423), but not by Gal4-COUP-TFI(155-388) which lacks a repressor domain. Coexpression of a C-terminal deletion mutant of Ubc9(1-58), which fails to interact with COUP-TFI, but retains a transcriptional repression domain, has no effect on Gal4-COUP-TFI-mediated repression activity. These findings indicate that interaction of Ubc9 with COUP-TFI is crucial for the corepressor function of Ubc9. Overexpression of Ubc9 similarly enhances COUP-TFI-dependent repression of the promoter activity of the bovine CYP17 gene encoding steroid 17alpha-hydroxylase. In addition, the C93S mutant of Ubc9, which abrogates SUMO-1 conjugation activity, continues to function as a COUP-TFI corepressor. Our studies indicate that Ubc9 functions as a novel COUP-TFI corepressor, the function of which is distinct from its SUMO-1 conjugating enzyme activity.

Animals↗

Glucose-induced repression of PPARalpha gene expression in pancreatic beta-cells involves PP2A activation and AMPK inactivation.

Tight regulation of fatty acid metabolism in pancreatic beta-cells is important for beta-cell viability and function. Chronic exposure to elevated concentrations of fatty acid is associated with beta-cell lipotoxicity. Glucose is known to repress fatty acid oxidation and hence to augment the toxicity of fatty acids. The peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) is a key activator of genes involved in beta-cell fatty acid oxidation, and transcription of the PPARalpha gene has been shown to be repressed by increasing concentrations of glucose in beta-cells. However, the mechanism underlying this transcriptional repression by glucose remains unclear. Here we report that glucose-induced repression of PPARalpha gene expression in INS-1E cells is independent of beta-cell excitation and insulin secretion but requires activation of protein phosphatase 2A in a process involving inactivation of the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). Pharmacological activation of AMPK at high glucose concentrations interferes with glucose repression of PPARalpha and PPARalpha target genes in INS-1E cells as well as in rat islets. Specific knock-down of the catalytic AMPK-subunit AMPKalpha2 but not AMPKalpha1 using RNAi suppressed PPARalpha expression, thereby mimicking the effect of glucose. These results indicate that activation of protein phosphatase 2A and subsequent inactivation of AMPK is necessary for glucose repression of PPARalpha expression in pancreatic beta-cells.

AMP-Activated Protein Kinases↗

HoxA10 represses transcription of the gene encoding p67phox in phagocytic cells.

p67(phox) and gp91(phox) are components of the phagocyte-specific respiratory burst oxidase that are encoded by the NCF2 and CYBB genes, respectively. These genes are transcribed exclusively in myeloid cells that have differentiated beyond the promyelocyte stage. In mature phagocytes, NCF2 and CYBB transcription continues until cell death and further increases in response to IFN-gamma and other inflammatory mediators. Because p67(phox) and gp91(phox) expression profiles are similar, we hypothesize that common transcription factors interact with homologous cis elements in the CYBB and NCF2 genes to coordinate transcription. Previously, we identified a negative CYBB promoter cis element that is repressed by the homeodomain transcription factor HoxA10. We found that transcriptional repression requires HoxA10-dependent recruitment of histone deacetylase activity to the CYBB cis element. In response to IFN-gamma, phosphorylation of two tyrosine residues in the HoxA10 homeodomain decreases binding to CYBB promoter, thereby abrogating HoxA10-mediated repression. In the current studies, we investigate the possibility that HoxA10 similarly represses NCF2 transcription. We identify a sequence in the NCF2 promoter that is homologous to the HoxA10-binding CYBB cis element. We find that this NCF2 promoter sequence functions as a negative cis element that is repressed by HoxA10 in a tyrosine phosphorylation and histone deacetylase-dependent manner. Our results suggest that cytokine-stimulated pathways regulate HoxA10-mediated repression of the CYBB and NCF2 genes in differentiating myeloid cells and in mature phagocytes during the inflammatory response. Because p67(phox) and gp91(phox) are rate-limiting components for respiratory burst activity, our studies may identify rational therapeutic targets to modulate free radical generation in pathological conditions.

Animals↗

The dual specificity phosphatase Cdc25C is a direct target for transcriptional repression by the tumor suppressor p53.

The cdc25C gene has been shown to be a novel target for transcriptional downregulation by p53. Two independent mechanisms contribute to the p53-dependent repression of the cdc25C gene. First, an element in the cdc25C promoter consisting of a binding site for p53 plus an adjacent 8 base pairs confers p53-dependent repression. Mutation of either the p53 binding site or the adjacent 8 bp sequence abolishes this effect. The element conferring p53-dependent repression also contains a binding site for the transcription factor Sp1 and a mutant p53 protein that retains the ability to interact with the p53-binding site is defective in mediating repression. Second, a minimal promoter lacking the p53 binding site but containing a previously characterized CDE/CHR element is also repressed by p53. This repression is abrogated when a 5 bp mutation is introduced in the CHR sequence. These results support a model for p53 downregulating cdc25C expression, in part, by direct binding to a promoter element that is likely to require cooperation with an additional cellular factor.

Animals↗

Adenoviral expression of p53 represses telomerase activity through down-regulation of human telomerase reverse transcriptase transcription.

Telomerase activation is a critical step in cellular immortality and oncogenesis. The activity of telomerase is known to be correlated with cell proliferation, but its regulation by cell cycle regulators is not well understood. In the present study, we examined the effects of p53 on telomerase activity. Wild-type p53 was introduced into SiHa cells via a recombinant adenoviral vector, Ad5CMV-p53, and change in telomerase activity was examined by quantitative telomerase assay. Telomerase activity in the Ad5CMV-p53-infected cells was significantly repressed 36 h after infection following down-regulation of human telomerase catalytic subunit [human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT)] mRNA expression, whereas no change in telomerase activity was observed in the cells infected with control vector AdSCMV-beta-gal. Interestingly, repression of telomerase activity was an early event that preceded cell growth inhibition or apoptosis induced by p53 overexpression, suggesting that p53 directly regulates telomerase activity. Transient expression assays using hTERT-promoter reporter constructs revealed that overexpression of p53 significantly repressed promoter activity of hTERT. 5'-Truncation of the promoter sequences revealed that the proximal core promoter region containing multiple binding sites for transcription factor Spl was responsible for p53-mediated transcriptional repression. Mutations in these binding sites for Spl led to failure of p53 to repress transcription. These findings suggest that p53 repressed telomerase activity through down-regulation of hTERT transcription and that interaction of p53 with Sp1 or other transcription factors may be involved in this regulation.

Adenoviridae↗

A repressive cross-regulation between catalytic and promoter activities of the CYP1A1 and CYP2E1 genes: role of H(2)O(2).

Cytochrome P450 enzymes catalyze the first step of the metabolism and subsequent elimination of hydrophobic xenobiotics. However, the activity of some isoforms, among them CYP1A1 and CYP2E1, may result in cellular insults such as oxidative stress and activation of procarcinogen compounds into reactive metabolites. The regulation of the expression of these enzymes is therefore important. We have previously shown that the CYP1A1 gene promoter was repressed by oxidative stress. We show here that the CYP2E1 gene promoter is down-regulated by exogenous H(2)O(2) addition and glutathione depletion. It is also repressed by the transfection of a CYP2E1 expression vector, which elicits an intracellular H(2)O(2) generation. This autoregulation is limited by catalase (which catalyzes the catabolism of H(2)O(2)), thus implying H(2)O(2) as a mediator of the negative feedback mechanism. Furthermore, we observed that the activity of CYP1A1 resulting either from the stimulation of the endogenous gene by benzo[a]pyrene treatment or from the transfection of an expression vector, repressed the activity of the CYP2E1 gene promoter. Conversely, CYP2E1 overexpression repressed the activity of the CYP1A1 gene promoter. In both cases, catalase and a specific inhibitor of one enzyme prevented the repression of the other. This suggests that the generation of H(2)O(2) during the catalytic cycle of these enzymes is a mediator of the cross-regulatory mechanisms. These novel repressive mechanisms of autoregulation and cross-regulation using H(2)O(2) as a common mediator may limit the potential toxicity resulting from high cytochrome P450 activity within the cell.

Catalysis↗

AML-1/ETO fusion protein is a dominant negative inhibitor of transcriptional repression by the promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger protein.

The AML-1/ETO fusion protein, created by the (8;21) translocation in M2-type acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), is a dominant repressive form of AML-1. This effect is due to the ability of the ETO portion of the protein to recruit co-repressors to promoters of AML-1 target genes. The t(11;17)(q21;q23)-associated acute promyelocytic leukemia creates the promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger PLZFt/RAR alpha fusion protein and, in a similar manner, inhibits RAR alpha target gene expression and myeloid differentiation. PLZF is expressed in hematopoietic progenitors and functions as a growth suppressor by repressing cyclin A2 and other targets. ETO is a corepressor for PLZF and potentiates transcriptional repression by linking PLZF to a histone deacetylase-containing complex. In transiently transfected cells and in a cell line derived from a patient with t(8;21) leukemia, PLZF and AML-1/ETO formed a tight complex. In transient assays, AML-1/ETO blocked transcriptional repression by PLZF, even at substoichiometric levels relative to PLZF. This effect was dependent on the presence of the ETO zinc finger domain, which recruits corepressors, and could not be rescued by overexpression of co-repressors that normally enhance PLZF repression. AML-1/ETO also excluded PLZF from the nuclear matrix and reduced its ability to bind to its cognate DNA-binding site. Finally, ETO interacted with PLZF/RAR alpha and enhanced its ability to repress through the RARE. These data show a link in the transcriptional pathways of M2 and M3 leukemia. (Blood. 2000;96:3939-3947)

Binding Sites↗

A 250-nucleotide UA-rich element in the 3' untranslated region of Xenopus laevis Vg1 mRNA represses translation both in vivo and in vitro.

Xenopus laevis Vgl mRNA undergoes both localization and translational control during oogenesis. Vg1 protein does not appear until late stage IV, after localization is complete. To determine whether Vg1 translation is regulated by cytoplasmic polyadenylation, the RACE-PAT method was used. Vg1 mRNA has a constant poly(A) tail throughout oogenesis, precluding a role for cytoplasmic polyadenylation. To identify cis-acting elements involved in Vg1 translational control, the Vg1 3' UTR was inserted downstream of the luciferase ORF and in vitro transcribed, adenylated mRNA injected into stage III or stage VI oocytes. The Vg1 3' UTR repressed luciferase translation in both stages. Deletion analysis of the Vg1 3' UTR revealed that a 250-nt UA-rich fragment, the Vg1 translational element or VTE, which lies 118 nt downstream of the Vg1 localization element, could repress translation as well as the full-length Vg1 3' UTR. Poly(A)-dependent translation is not necessary for repression as nonadenylated mRNAs are also repressed, but cap-dependent translation is required as introduction of the classical swine fever virus IRES upstream of the luciferase coding region prevents repression by the VTE. Repression by the Vg1 3' UTR has been reproduced in Xenopus oocyte in vitro translation extracts, which show a 10-25-fold synergy between the cap and poly(A) tail. A number of proteins UV crosslink to the VTE including FRGY2 and proteins of 36, 42, 45, and 60 kDa. The abundance of p42, p45, and p60 is strikingly higher in stages I-III than in later stages, consistent with a possible role for these proteins in Vg1 translational control.

3' Untranslated Regions↗

Unbiased analysis of RB-mediated transcriptional repression identifies novel targets and distinctions from E2F action.

The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor, RB, is thought to inhibit cell cycle progression through transcriptional repression. E2F-regulated genes have been viewed as presumptive targets of RB-mediated repression. However, we found that specific E2F targets were not regulated in a consistent manner by the action of a RB allele that is refractory to cyclin-dependent kinase/cyclin-mediated phosphorylation (PSM-RB) when compared with E2F2 overproduction. Therefore, we used Affymetrix GeneChips as an unbiased approach to identify RB targets. We found that expression of PSM-RB significantly attenuates >200 targets, the majority of which are involved in cell cycle control (DNA replication or G2-M), DNA repair, or transcription/chromatin structure. The observed repression was due to the action of RB and not merely a manifestation of altered cell cycle distribution. Additionally, the majority of RB repression targets were confirmed through the blockade of endogenous RB phosphorylation via p16ink4a overexpression. Thus, these results have utility in assigning RB pathway activation in more complex systems of cell cycle inhibition (e.g., mitogen withdrawal, senescence, or DNA damage checkpoint). As expected, a significant fraction of RB-repressed genes have promoters that are bound/regulated by E2F family members. However, targets were identified that are distinct from genes known to be stimulated by overexpression of specific E2F proteins. Moreover, the relative action of RB versus E2F2 overexpression on specific genes demonstrates that a simple opposition model does not explain the relative contribution of RB to gene regulation. Thus, this study provides the first unbiased description of RB-repressed genes, thereby delineating new aspects of RB-mediated transcriptional control and novel targets involved in diverse cellular processes.

Animals↗

Repression of vascular endothelial growth factor A in glioblastoma cells using engineered zinc finger transcription factors.

Angiogenic factors are necessary for tumor proliferation and thus are attractive therapeutic targets. In this study, we have used engineered zinc finger protein (ZFP) transcription factors (TFs) to repress expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A in human cancer cell lines. We create potent transcriptional repressors by fusing a designed ZFP targeted to the VEGF-A promoter with either the ligand-binding domain of thyroid hormone receptor alpha or its viral relative, vErbA. Moreover, this ZFP-vErbA repressor binds its intended target site in vivo and mediates the specific deacetylation of histones H3 and H4 at the targeted promoter, a result that emulates the natural repression mechanism of these domains. The potential therapeutic relevance of ZFP-mediated VEGF-A repression was addressed using the highly tumorigenic glioblastoma cell line U87MG. Despite the aberrant overexpression of VEGF-A in this cell line, engineered ZFP TFs were able to repress the expression of VEGF-A by >20-fold. The VEGF-A levels observed after ZFP TF-mediated repression were comparable to those of a nonangiogenic cancer line (U251MG), suggesting that the degree of repression obtained with the ZFP TF would be sufficient to suppress tumor angiogenesis. Thus, engineered ZFP TFs are shown to be potent regulators of gene expression with therapeutic promise in the treatment of disease.

Cell Line, Tumor↗

[Some problems about incapability to work in direct connection to repression of people applied for relevant pension in accordance to the act from 24.01.1991].

In accordance to the act dated 24.01.1991 refeRring to combatants, victims of repression repressed in the years 1940-1956 apply for relevant pensions. There have been 6510 petitions for relevant pensions related to repression registered between 01.09.1997 to 31.12.2003 in the Social Insurance Department in Szczecin. It is very difficult to form an opinion of long lasting incapability to work related to repression ceasing over 50 years ago. During the medical examination most patents were 60 and over years old and have since retired. The actual system of relevant pensions in connection with repression made by Social Insurance Department is considered compensatory. It seems feasible to consider a new equal compensation system for all cases of repression.

Aged↗

Repression of enhancer activity by the adenovirus E1A tumor protein(s) is mediated through a novel HeLa cell nuclear factor.

We have examined the mechanism for the host cell-dependent repression of enhancer activity by the adenovirus early region 1A (E1A) proteins. The enhancer used in this study, from the human BK virus P2, functions efficiently in cis to activate expression from the adenovirus major late promoter in the human kidney cell line, 293, and in a monkey kidney cell line, MK2. In addition, enhancer activity can be stimulated by the E1A gene products in these cells. However, cis-enhancer activity is repressed in the HeLa cell line, and we demonstrate here that further repression can be induced by the E1A proteins. We show that the binding site for the negative regulatory factor involved in cis-repression, designated BK virus enhancer factor 1 (BEF-1), is also required for E1A-induced repression. Using gel mobility retardation assays, we demonstrated a 4-fold increase in active BEF-1 in nuclear extracts containing the E1A proteins. However, the E1A proteins did not change the binding pattern or the strength of binding of BEF-1 to its target sequence. BEF-1 was identified as a 98-kDa nuclear factor, and phosphorylation was shown to be important for DNA binding. Three potential nuclear factor 1 (NF-1) sites are present in the BEF-1-binding site. Using a known NF-1 site as competitor DNA in a gel mobility retardation assay, we provide evidence that BEF-1 may be a newly identified NF-1 family member. In addition, the sequence TGA present in the repressor-binding site was shown to be essential for high affinity binding of BEF-1. Overall, our data demonstrate that an enhancer can be repressed by the trans-activation of a negative regulatory factor.

Adenovirus Early Proteins↗

Isolation and characterization of carbon catabolite repression mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Two carbon catabolite repression mutants of S. cerevisiae were isolated and characterized. In spite of the selection procedure (red colonies after tetrazolium overlay at high glucose concentration) the mutants exhibited a respiration which was as repressed as that of the parental strain or even more repressed. When grown at high glucose concentration the mutants display hyper-repression of cytochrome aa3 and of certain mitochondrial enzymes (L- and D-lactate dehydrogenases) but not of others (malate dehydrogenase, succinate dehydrogenase), indicating the existence of separate control sites for the different genes involved in the mitochondrial biogenesis. The data obtained pointed out that the same mutation affects both repression and derepression. In addition, the mutation(s) give rise to the complete derepression of the cytoplasmic enzyme NAD-glutamate dehydrogenase at 10% glucose whereas the enzyme is normally repressed at 3% glucose. The results of the genetic analysis indicate the mitochondrial nature of the mutation(s).

Carbon↗