Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “OXYTOCICS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 649 records · Page 36Linked to original sources

Prophylactic syntometrine versus oxytocin for delivery of the placenta.

BACKGROUND: The routine prophylactic administration of an oxytocic agent is an integral part of active management of the third stage of labour. These agents help prevent postpartum haemorrhage. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of ergometrine-oxytocin (syntometrine) with oxytocin alone in reducing the risk of postpartum haemorrhage (blood loss of equal to or greater than 500 millilitres) and other maternal and neonatal outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register. SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials of oxytocic drugs (syntometrine or oxytocin) in women having the third stage of labour managed actively. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Eligibility, trial quality assessment and data extraction were done independently by three reviewers. Study authors were contacted for additional information. MAIN RESULTS: Six trials were included. Compared with oxytocin, ergometrine-oxytocin (syntometrine) was associated with a small reduction in the risk of postpartum haemorrhage (odds ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 0.85). This advantage was smaller but still significant when 10 international units of oxytocin was used. There was no difference seen between the groups using either five or 10 international units for blood loss equal to or greater than 1000 millilitres. Adverse effects of vomiting and hypertension were associated with the use of ergometrine-oxytocin. No significant differences were found in other maternal or neonatal outcomes. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The use of the combination preparation syntometrine (oxytocin and ergometrine) as part of the routine active management of the third stage of labour appears to be associated with a statistically significant reduction in the risk of postpartum haemorrhage when compared to oxytocin where blood loss is less than 1000ml. No difference was seen between the groups using either five or 10 international units for blood loss equal to or greater than 1000 millilitres. This needs to be weighed against the more common adverse effects associated with the use of syntometrine.

Ergonovine↗

Prophylactic use of oxytocin in the third stage of labour.

BACKGROUND: Many maternal deaths across the world result from complications of the third stage of labour (when the placenta is delivered). OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of oxytocin given prophylactically in the third stage of labour on maternal and neonatal outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: Relevant trials were identified in the Cochrane Collaboration Controlled Trials Register and the Pregnancy and Childbirth Review Group's Specialised Register of Controlled Trials. Date of last search: May 2001. SELECTION CRITERIA: All acceptably randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials including pregnant women anticipating a vaginal delivery where oxytocin was given prophylactically for the third stage of labour. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed studies for relevance and methodological quality, and extracted data. Analysis was by intention to treat. Subgroup analyses were based on extent of selection bias, oxytocin in the context of active or expectant management of the third stage, and timing of administration. Results are presented as relative risks, and weighted mean difference, both with 95% confidence intervals using a fixed effects model. MAIN RESULTS: In seven trials involving over 3000 women in hospital and/or developed country settings, prophylactic oxytocin showed benefits (reduced blood loss (relative risk (RR) for blood loss > 500 ml 0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43, 0.59) and need for therapeutic oxytocics (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.39, 0.64).) compared to no uterotonics, although there was a non-significant trend towards more manual removal of the placenta (RR 1.17; 95% CI 0.79, 1.73) which was most marked in the expectant management subgroup, and blood transfusions (RR 1.30; 95% CI 0.50, 3.39) in the trials with more manual removals of the placenta). In six trials involving over 2800 women, there was little evidence of differential effects for oxytocin versus ergot alkaloids, except ergot alkaloids are associated with more manual removals of the placenta (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.41, 0.79), and with the suggestion of more raised blood pressure (RR 0.53; 95% CI 0.19, 1.58) than with oxytocin. In five trials involving over 2800 women, there was little evidence of a synergistic effects of adding oxytocin to ergometrine versus ergometrine alone. For all other outcomes in the comparisons either there are no data or the number of adverse events is very small, and so definite conclusions cannot be drawn. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There are strong suggestions of benefit for oxytocin in terms of postpartum haemorrhage, and the need for therapeutic oxytocics, but without sufficient information about other outcomes and side-effects it is difficult to be confident about the trade-offs for these benefits, especially if the risk of manual removal of the placenta may be increased. There seems little evidence in favour of ergot alkaloids alone compared to either oxytocin alone, or to Syntometrine, but the data are sparse. More trials are needed in domiciliary deliveries in developing countries, which shoulder most of the burden of third stage complications.

Ergot Alkaloids↗

Risk factors for primary postpartum haemorrhage. A case control study.

The objective of the study was to determine which background factors predispose women to primary postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) at the Obafemi Awolowo University Hospital. The study consisted of 101 women who developed PPH after a normal vaginal delivery and 107 women with normal unassisted vaginal delivery without PPH Both cases and controls were investigated for sociodemographic risk factors, medical and obstetric histories, antenatal events and labour and delivery outcomes. Data were abstracted from the medical and delivery records and risks were estimated by multivariate logistic regression. The results of the univariate analysis revealed a number of potential risk factors for PPH but after adjustment by logistic regression three factors remained significant. These were prolonged second and third stages of labour and non-use of oxytocics after vaginal delivery. Previously hypothesised risk factors for PPH such as grand multiparity, primigravidity and previous episodes of PPH were not significantly associated with PPH. We conclude that primary PPH in this population is mostly associated with prolonged second and third stages of labour and non use of oxytocics. Efforts to reduce the incidence of PPH should not only be directed at proper management of labour but also training and retraining of primary health care workers and alternative health care providers in the early referral of patients with prolonged labour.

Adult↗

Management of the third stage of labour in women at low risk of postpartum haemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE: To compare active management with physiological management of the third stage of labour in women at low risk of postpartum haemorrhage. DESIGN: Randomised allocation of women in labour at low risk of postpartum haemorrhage to either physiological or active management of the third stage. SETTING: Labour ward in a district general hospital. PATIENTS: 193 Women with spontaneous vaginal delivery at term completed the study. Exclusion criteria were induction or augmentation of labour, antepartum or previous postpartum haemorrhage, premature rupture of membranes, previous caesarean section, raised blood pressure, cervical lacerations and third degree tears. INTERVENTIONS: Active management with syntometrine and controlled cord traction; or physiological management, where the cord was not clamped and the placenta was delivered by maternal effort. MEASUREMENTS: Blood loss was measured subjectively at delivery and estimated objectively by comparing the haemoglobin in labour with that on the third postpartum day. The duration of the third stage was also measured as was the incidence of retained placenta and blood transfusion. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the estimated blood loss or haemoglobin drop between the two groups (P > 0.5). In addition the duration of the third stage was significantly longer in the physiological group (P < 0.001). Out of 90 women having physiological management, 7 received oxytocics for presumed postpartum haemorrhage. Only one case in the active group required further oxytocics and one other case in this group required a manual removal of placenta. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study confirms that active management results in a reduction in the length of the third stage of labour. However, it suggests that active management does not reduce blood loss when compared to physiological management in the woman at low risk of postpartum haemorrhage.

Delivery, Obstetric↗

The role of oral (methyl)ergometrine in the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage.

Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is one of the most important causes of maternal mortality in developing countries. A consensus was reached on active management of the third stage of labour for all parturients especially for those for whom the access to hospital services is difficult or time-consuming. Oral (methyl)ergometrine was considered to be a possible alternative prophylactic oxytocic, that was easy to administer and suitable to be used in developing countries. A research project was set up to investigate its suitability to be used for active management of the third stage of labour. It was examined on its stability under tropical conditions; on its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and on its clinical effect on the amount of bloodloss after childbirth. Oral (methyl)ergometrine is unstable even when stored after refrigerated conditions. Its pharmacokinetic and dynamic properties are unpredictable and no clinical effect on reduction of bloodloss after childbirth has been shown. To ameliorate a product's stability seems unlogical, if the same product shows unfavourable pharmacokinetics. All the more so, since the tablets do not show the wanted clinical effects. Oral (methyl)ergometrine is not an alternative to parenteral prophylactic oxytocic drugs in the active management of the third stage of labour.

Administration, Oral↗

Sublingual misoprostol versus methylergometrine for active management of the third stage of labor.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and side effects of sublingual misoprostol and intravenous methylergometrine for active management of third stage of labor. METHOD: One hundred twenty low risk pregnant women at term with spontaneous onset of labor were included in the study. The women were randomized to receive either two tablets of misoprostol (200 microg/tablet) sublingually or 1 ml of methylergometrine (200 microg) intravenous injection, after the delivery of the anterior shoulder of the baby. The main outcome measures were: need for additional oxytocic drugs, blood loss >or=500 ml, change in hemoglobin levels and side effects. RESULTS: Postpartum hemorrhage as defined by hemorrhage >or=500 ml occurred in 3.1% of the women in the sublingual misoprostol group but none of the women in the methylergometrine group (P > 0.05). There was a need for additional oxytocic drugs in 5.0% and 8.3% after methylergometrine and misoprostol, respectively (P > 0.05). The change in hemoglobin levels at 24 h postpartum were 0.8 and 0.7 gm% in methylergometrine and misoprostol group, respectively(P > 0.05). In the misoprostol group, 6.6% women developed fever >or=38 degrees C and 21.6% had shivering while in methylergometrine group none experienced these side effects. However, the incidence of other side effects like nausea, vomiting, headache and giddiness were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Sublingual misoprostol appears to be as effective as intravenous methylergometrine in the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage. However, larger randomized studies are needed to advocate its routine use.

Administration, Sublingual↗

Oral misoprostol in the third stage of labor.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of intravenous ergometrine, intramuscular oxytocin, and oral misoprostol in the control of postpartum hemorrhage. METHODS: Mean blood loss, rates of blood loss between 500 and 1000 ml, hematocrit fall greater than 10%, and need for additional oxytocic agents and nature and rates of adverse effects were assessed in this prospective, randomized, controlled study. RESULTS: All outcomes were similar in the 3 groups. The main adverse effects in the misoprostol group were temperatures higher than 99 degrees F, which normalized within 2 h and shivering, which was mild and self-limiting. CONCLUSIONS: Oral misoprostol is as effective as conventional oxytocic agents in preventing postpartum hemorrhage and can be recommended for use in low-resource settings.

Administration, Oral↗

Misoprostol in preventing postpartum hemorrhage: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess misoprostol's ability to prevent postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) where no alternatives exist. Comparison to oxytocics demonstrates how similarly misoprostol achieves a level of effectiveness-obtainable only in hospitals-in remote locations around the world. METHOD: Using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects model and the DerSirmonian and Laird random-effects model, summary statistics indicated that misoprostol's excess risk of PPH was only 4% when compared to oxytocics. RESULT: This risk difference was well within the range of expected results for all uterotonic agents and does not warrant branding misoprostol as an inferior drug. CONCLUSION: Conventional uterotonic drugs should not be used to set the lowest-accepted level of effectiveness in settings where they are entirely unsuitable. Continuing to weigh the benefits of one effective drug against another only delays the distribution of misoprostol in countries where it is the only feasible choice and must be measured against no treatment at all.

Female↗

Sublingual misoprostol versus oxytocin infusion to reduce blood loss at cesarean section.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of sublingual misoprostol administered immediately after delivery of the neonate at cesarean section, with intravenous oxytocin infusion in prevention of uterine atony and thereby reducing blood loss at cesarean section. METHODS: One hundred women with singleton term pregnancy undergoing elective or emergency lower segment cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were included in this study. They were randomly allocated to receive either misoprostol 400 mug sublingually or intravenous infusion of 20 units of oxytocin soon after delivery of the neonate. The main outcome measures were blood loss at cesarean section, change in hemoglobin levels, need for additional oxytocics and drug related side effects. RESULTS: The mean blood loss estimated was significantly lower in misoprostol group compared to oxytocin group (819 ml versus 974 ml; p = 0.004). The number of women who had blood loss exceeding 500 ml and the change in hemoglobin, however, was comparable between the two groups. There was a need for additional oxytocic therapy in 16% and 18% after use of misoprostol and oxytocin respectively (p = 0.673). The incidence of side effects such as pyrexia, shivering and metallic taste was significantly higher in misoprostol group compared to oxytocin group. CONCLUSION: Sublingual misoprostol appears to be as effective as intravenous infusion of oxytocin in reducing blood loss at cesarean section. However, occurrence of transient side effects such as shivering and pyrexia were noted more frequently with the use of misoprostol.

Administration, Sublingual↗

The availability of life-saving obstetric services in developing countries: an in-depth look at the signal functions for emergency obstetric care.

OBJECTIVE: This paper examines the frequency with which a set of life-saving interventions or signal functions was performed to treat major obstetric complications. METHODS AND RESULTS: The basic signal functions include parenteral antibiotics, anticonvulsants and oxytocics, and the procedures of manual removal of the placenta, removal of retained uterine products, and assisted vaginal delivery. Comprehensive functions include the six basic functions, cesarean delivery, and blood transfusions. Data from 1906 health facilities in 13 countries indicate that the most likely functions to be reported are oxytocics and antibiotics. The basic function least likely to be reported is assisted vaginal delivery. Many of the facilities surveyed did not have the infrastructure to perform operations or provide blood transfusions. CONCLUSIONS: These data can help governments allocate their budgets appropriately, help policy makers and planners identify systemic bottlenecks and prioritize solutions. Monitoring the performance of the functions informs us of the capacity of the health system to provide key interventions when obstetric emergencies occur.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Sildenafil inhibits agonist-evoked rat uterine contractility: influence of guanylyl cyclase inhibition.

Sildenafil shows a potent relaxant effect on corpus cavernosum smooth muscles by prolonging cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) actions. We investigated whether this inhibitory effect of sildenafil was also displayed on the uterine musculature. Isolated uteri of non-pregnant rats were used to measure the possible sildenafil-induced inhibition of contractions evoked by various oxytocic agents, viz., prostaglandin E2, oxytocin and acetylcholine. The relation of these effects to sildenafil action on cGMP was also examined, using methylene blue as a guanylyl cyclase inhibitor. Sildenafil (30 and 100 nM) was found to shift to the right the non-cumulative concentration-response curves of the test agonists in a concentration-dependent manner. The shift was accompanied by a reduction in the maximal response of the tissue to all uterine stimulants selected. Sildenafil also elicited a marked concentration-dependent increase in EC25 of prostaglandin E2, oxytocin and acetylcholine, as compared to their respective control values. Preincubation of the uterine strip with methylene blue (10 microM) reduced the inhibitory effects of sildenafil on oxytocin- and acetylcholine-evoked contractions, at submaximal concentrations of each agonist. The results suggest that sildenafil inhibits the uterotonic potentials of various oxytocic agents and that this effect could be probably related to the drug's action on cGMP.

Acetylcholine↗

Active versus expectant management of third stage of labour: the Hinchingbrooke randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: This study tested the hypotheses that active management of the third stage of labour lowers the rates of primary postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) and longer-term consequences compared with expectant management, in a setting where both managements are commonly practised, and that this effect is not mediated by maternal posture. BACKGROUND: 1512 women judged to be at low risk of PPH (blood loss >500 mL) were randomly assigned active management of the third stage (prophylactic oxytocic within 2 min of baby's birth, immediate cutting and clamping of the cord, delivery of placenta by controlled cord traction or maternal effort) or expectant management (no prophylactic oxytocic, no cord clamping until pulsation ceased, delivery of placenta by maternal effort). Women were also randomly assigned upright or supine posture. Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: The rate of PPH was significantly lower with active than with expectant management (51 [6.8%] of 748 vs 126 [16.5%] of 764; relative risk 2.42 [95% CI 1.78-3.30], p<0.0001). Posture had no effect on this risk (upright 92 [12%] of 755 vs supine 85 [11%] of 757). Objective measures of blood loss confirmed the results. There was more vomiting in the active group but no other important differences were detected. INTERPRETATION: Active management of the third stage reduces the risk of PPH, whatever the woman's posture, even when midwives are familiar with both approaches. We recommend that clinical guidelines in hospital settings advocate active management (with oxytocin alone). However, decisions about individual care should take into account the weights placed by pregnant women and their caregivers on blood loss compared with an intervention-free third stage.

Constriction↗

Ascending dose tolerance study of intramuscular carbetocin administered after normal vaginal birth.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of carbetocin (a long-acting synthetic analogue of oxytocin), when administered immediately after vaginal delivery at term. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Carbetocin was given as an intramuscular injection immediately after the birth of the infant in 45 healthy women with normal singleton pregnancies who delivered vaginally at term. Dosage groups of 15, 30, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175 or 200 microg carbetocin were assigned to blocks of three women according to the continual reassessment method (CRM). RESULTS: All dosage groups consisted of three women, except those with 100 microg (n=6) and 200 microg (n=18). Recorded were dose-limiting adverse events: hyper- or hypotension (three), severe abdominal pain (0), vomiting (0) and retained placenta (four). Serious adverse events occurred in seven women: six cases with blood loss > or = 1000 ml, four cases of manual placenta removal, five cases of additional oxytocics administration and five cases of blood transfusion. Maximum blood loss was greatest at the upper and lower dose levels, and lowest in the 70-125 microg dose range. Four out of six cases with blood loss > or = 1000 ml occurred in the 200 microg group. The majority of additional administration of oxytocics (4/5) and blood transfusion (3/5) occurred in the dose groups of 200 microg. All retained placentae were found in the group of 200 microg. CONCLUSION: The MTD was calculated to be at 200 microg carbetocin.

Abdominal Pain↗

A randomized, controlled trial comparing effect of oral misoprostol and intravenous syntocinon on intra-operative blood loss during cesarean section.

BACKGROUND: Oxytocics are routinely used in an attempt to prevent excessive blood loss during cesarean section. Misoprostol, a potent uterotonic agent, has been reported to be useful in the prevention and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage by several investigators but its use during cesarean section has not been described. The objective of this study was to randomly compare the effectiveness of oral misoprostol with intravenous syntocinon on blood loss during elective cesarean sections under regional anesthesia. METHODS: Sixty pregnant women were randomized either to receive misoprostol 400 micrograms orally or syntocinon 10 IU intravenously during cesarean section. The primary outcome measure was intra-operative blood loss as estimated by physicians, and by values of preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin concentration and hematocrit. Demographic characteristics of the subjects and outcomes were compared using chi-square test for categorical and two-sample t-test for continuous data. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics in terms of age, body weight, parity, gestational age and indications for cesarean section were similar in both groups. The estimated blood loss was 545 ml (CI 476-614) in misoprostol group and 533 ml (CI 427-639) in syntocinon group (p = 0.85). Differences in preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit values were also similar in both groups. Two women in the misoprostol group and three in the syntocinon group (p=0.64) required additional oxytocics. One patient in each group required blood transfusion. No serious side effects were noted in either group. CONCLUSION: Oral misoprostol appears to be safe and as effective as intravenous syntocinon in reduction of intra-operative blood loss during elective cesarean section under regional anesthesia and merits further investigation.

Administration, Oral↗

Current strategies for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage in the third stage of labour.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite evidence that active management of the third stage of labour reduces the incidence of postpartum haemorrhage, expectant management is still widely practised. Factors accounting for this situation include the desire for a more natural experience of childbirth, the philosophy that active management is unnecessary in low-risk women, and avoidance of the adverse effects of conventional uterotonic agents. This review will evaluate the various strategies currently used for the prevention of primary postpartum haemorrhage. RECENT FINDINGS: Since publication of the first systematic review comparing active with expectant management in 1988, active management of the third stage using oxytocics has become increasingly adopted. Recent surveys, however, show that there are still wide variations in practice around the world. Recent interest has focused on the use of misoprostol for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage. Carbetocin, an oxytocin receptor agonist, shows promise but has not been evaluated for use after vaginal births. SUMMARY: Active management of the third stage of labour is superior to expectant management in terms of blood loss, postpartum haemorrhage and other serious complications, but is associated with unpleasant side effects and hypertension when ergometrine is included. Intramuscular oxytocin results in fewer side effects. Oral and rectal misoprostol has been extensively assessed and found to be less effective than conventional oxytocics with more side effects. Until alternative regimes of misoprostol are studied in large controlled trials, misoprostol is not recommended for routine use in the third stage of labour. Of the remaining uterotonic agents evaluated, intramuscular carbetocin appears the most promising.

Delivery, Obstetric↗

Use of oral misoprostol in the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of the oral prostaglandin E1 analogue, misoprostol in the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage. DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SETTING: A university teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and thirty-seven consecutive women undergoing vaginal delivery. METHODS: All the women were given 600 micrograms oral misoprostol just after delivery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of postpartum haemorrhage; need for therapeutic oxytocic drugs; retained placenta and length of the third stage of labour. RESULTS: Postpartum haemorrhage occurred in 6% of the women; the need for therapeutic oxytocics in 5%, retained placenta in 2% and the median length of the third stage was 5 min. Vomiting and diarrhoea in the first hour after delivery occurred in 8% and 3% respectively and shivering in 60%. CONCLUSIONS: Misoprostol may be effective in the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage, and has few side effects. A double blind randomised trial is required.

Administration, Oral↗

Misoprostol compared with methylergometrine for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage: a double-blind randomised trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and side effects of misoprostol, compared with methylergometrine, for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage. DESIGN: A double-blind, randomised clinical trial of 200 women with apparently normal pregnancies. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred women with apparently normal pregnancies. METHODS: After the baby had been born, all women received two capsules by mouth and the contents of an ampule by intravenous injection. Each woman only received one active product. The capsules contained either a total of 600 microg misoprostol or placebo, and the ampule 200 microg of methylergometrine or placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Need for further oxytocic drugs, blood pressure, the presence of side effects, mean haemoglobin and haematocrit three days after delivery. RESULTS: Two hundred women completed the study (100 received methylergometrine and 100 misoprostol). Postpartum haemorrhage occurred in 4.3% of the methylergometrine group and 8.3% of the misoprostol group (P = 0.57). The need for further oxytocic drugs was 4.4% and 12.8% after methylergometrine and misoprostol, respectively (P = 0.065). One hour after the birth of the baby there was no difference in the mean systolic blood pressure (117 +/- 12 mmHg versus 115 +/- 11 mmHg) (P = 0.26) or the mean diastolic blood pressure (72 +/- 10 mmHg versus 71 +/- 11 mmHg for the groups receiving methylergometrine or misoprostol, respectively) (P = 0.97). The mean temperature in the misoprostol group rose to 37.4 degrees C, compared with 37 degrees C in the methylergometrine group (P < 0.0001). In the misoprostol group 34% developed fever (> 38 degrees C) compared with 3% in the methylergometrine group (P < 0.0001). Shivering (visual analogue score > or = 8) also occurred more often after misoprostol (42%) than after methylergometrine (8.5%) (P < 0.0001). The haemoglobin level (g/dL) on the third postpartum day was similar for both groups ( 11.0 and 11.2 for methylergometrine and misoprostol, respectively) (P = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that although protection from postpartum haemorrhage using parenteral methylergometrine and oral misoprostol is nearly equal, misoprostol is associated with more side effects.

Administration, Oral↗

A randomised controlled trial of intramuscular syntometrine and intravenous oxytocin in the management of the third stage of labour.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous oxytocin with intramuscular syntometrine in the management of the third stage of labour. DESIGN: A prospective randomised trial. SETTING: A university teaching hospital. METHODS: A total of 991 women having a singleton pregnancy and vaginal delivery were randomised by a computer-generated number to receive either 1 ml syntometrine intramuscularly or 10 units of intravenous Syntocinon after delivery of the anterior shoulder of the fetus. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood loss during delivery, rate of postpartum haemorrhage, need for repeated oxytocics, haemoglobin level before and 24 hours after delivery, duration of third stage, need for manual removal of placenta and sides effects including hypertension, nausea, vomiting, headache and chest pain. RESULTS: The use of intravenous oxytocin was associated with a reduction in postpartum blood loss (P < 0.001) but there was no difference in the risk of postpartum haemorrhage in the need for repeated oxytocic injections and the drop in peripartum haemoglobin level between the two groups. There was also no difference in the risk of prolonged third stage, or in the need for manual removal of placenta. The use of syntometrine was associated with a higher risk of hypertension (RR 2.39, 95% CI 1.00-5.70). Other side effects were mild in nature with no differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: There are no important clinical differences in the effectiveness of intramuscular syntometrine and intravenous oxytocin for the prevention of postpartum blood loss. Intravenous oxytocin is less likely to cause hypertension.

Adult↗