Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “MASTECTOMY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 649 records · Page 36Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Early stage breast cancer: costs and quality of life one year after treatment by mastectomy or conservative surgery and radiation therapy.

This paper reports a descriptive study of the costs and quality of life (QoL) outcome of treatments for early stage breast cancer in a cohort of Australian women, one year after initial surgical treatment. Mastectomy without breast reconstruction is compared to breast conserving surgery and radiotherapy (breast conservation). Of the 397 women eligible for the study, costing data were collected for 81% and quality of life data for 73%. The cost differences between treatment groups were mainly accounted for by adjuvant therapies, the more expensive being radiotherapy. When compared to women treated by mastectomy, those treated by breast conservation reported better body image but worse physical function. The negative impact of breast cancer and its treatment was greater for younger women, across a number of dimensions of quality of life (regardless of treatment type). While this study shows that breast conservation is more expensive than mastectomy, the QoL results reinforce the importance of patient participation in treatment decisions.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2006

[Prophylactic mastectomy in women at high risk for breast and ovarian cancer: qualitative analysis of the decision making process and long-term satisfaction of two women carrying a BRCA1-mutation].

PURPOSE: Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy are currently the most effective prevention options for female carriers of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene. However, especially the mastectomy procedure is very invasive and is chosen rarely among high risk women in Germany. Little is known about how women cope with this surgery and their long-term satisfaction. METHODS: Face-to-face interviews were conducted with two BRCA1 mutation carriers, who had undergone prophylactic mastectomy in their twenties 9 and 16 years ago. The process of decision making and long-term satisfaction were analysed using Mayring's qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Both high risk women had a significant family history of breast and ovarian cancer. They were repeatedly confronted with uncontrollable courses of disease in their relatives who died of breast cancer between the age of 20 and 30 and left small children behind. Although both women experienced different decision making and peri- and post-operative complications, both were satisfied with the decision for prophylactic surgery and showed no regret. DISCUSSION: Deciding to obtain genetic testing pushed women towards further decision making concerning prophylactic surgery in case they carry a mutation. Information about carrier status reduced uncertainty even if the result was adverse. Both high risk women experienced a decrease in cancer related anxiety which may have heightened tolerance for quality of life related impairments. Implications for counseling are described.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

The use of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients undergoing skin sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative frozen section examination of the sentinel node in breast cancer patients is associated with a high number of incorrect negative results with the sentinel node becoming positive in the permanent examination and necessitating a secondary axillary lymph node dissection. A reoperation of the axilla following skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous tissue reconstruction may compromise the vascular pedicle of the flap and should be avoided. METHODS: Eighty breast cancer patients underwent skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate autologous reconstruction and sentinel node biopsy followed by axillary lymph node dissection irrespective of the result of the frozen section of the sentinel node. The goal of the study was to identify a subgroup of patients with incorrect negative sentinel node(s) in the frozen section who may forego a secondary axillary lymph node dissection due to a low risk of positive nonsentinel nodes. RESULTS: Frozen section examination of the sentinel node was negative in 58 patients and positive in 22 patients. Permanent histologic examination revealed tumor in 13 of 58 (22.4 percent) sentinel node(s) found negative in the frozen section. None of these 13 patients showed positive nodes in the axillary specimen, whereas nine of 22 patients with their metastases in the sentinel node found through intraoperative frozen section examination had additional positive nonsentinel node(s) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with incorrect negative sentinel node(s) found in the frozen section examination had a significantly decreased risk for additional positive nonsentinel node(s) compared with patients with sentinel node metastases found in the frozen section. However, to avoid a secondary axillary lymph node dissection, the authors suggest performing sentinel node biopsy before mastectomy under local anesthesia to have the permanent result of the sentinel node available before a planned reconstruction.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

[A case regarded as an occult breast cancer treated without mastectomy].

A 51-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with a chief complaint of left axillary tumors. No such tumors were detected in bilateral breasts by ultrasonic tomography, mammography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. The core needle biopsy from the left axillary lymph node was examined, and the specimen revealed an occult breast cancer, because the microscopic findings resembled the breast cancer organization and immunochemistry revealed positivity of the estrogen receptor. The radical left axillary dissection was operated. Tamoxifen and FEC 100 6 cycles were selected as adjuvant treatment. At one year after operation, she has no recurrence. Carcinoma cells had portedly been recognized in the mammary gland with 82.7% of the cases who had undergone mastectomy for occult breast cancer. However, in many cases, the patient's consent for mastectomy was not obtained like as in this case, and the choice of treatment is often difficult. We considered that the case's accumulation was necessary to verify the possibility of the mastectomy omission to an occult breast cancer, presented the case report.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed1996

Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

Skin-sparing mastectomy refers to a standard mastectomy aimed at minimizing unnecessary skin sacrifice of the breast when immediate breast reconstruction is planned. Preservation of breast skin unaffected by tumor provides an ideal color and texture match of the reconstructed breast with the opposite breast. The advantages of immediate breast reconstruction are its cost-effectiveness--only 1 anesthesia induction and hospitalization are required--and an improved cosmetic outcome that translates into a positive body image for the patient. Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction does not increase local or regional cancer recurrence or interfere with adjuvant radiation therapy or chemotherapy. The 2 techniques employed for creating a reconstructed breast mound are saline- or silicone-gel-filled implants and the use of autogenous tissue.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1992

Risk factors for failure of immediate breast reconstruction with prosthesis after total mastectomy for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) after mastectomy represents a clear improvement in the quality of life of patients with breast cancer, but prosthesis removal is relatively frequent. Therefore, it is important to identify risk factors related to this removal. METHODS: A series of 142 patients treated with mastectomy and IBR at the Institut Gustave-Roussy between January 1976 and December 1988 were studied. Forty-seven had an in situ carcinoma, 93 an infiltrating carcinoma, and 2 a fibrosarcoma. IBR failures were defined as removal of the prosthesis, and early failures as removal during the first 7 weeks after IBR. RESULTS: The early failure rate was significantly higher in patients with invasive carcinomas or fibrosarcomas than patients with in situ carcinomas (12% versus 0%, P = 0.04). The risk of late IBR failure was significantly higher in patients who had received postoperative radiation therapy than patients who did not (P = 0.0002). However, this increased risk applied only to women in whom the chest wall was exposed to radiation because of a high risk of recurrence. CONCLUSION: It might be preferable to postpone breast reconstruction for patients with infiltrating breast carcinoma because early complications are not infrequent and could delay adjuvant chemotherapy. Late complications associated with chest wall irradiation could be avoided with the use of alternative techniques such as the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap procedure.

Breast↗
PubMed2003

Impact of skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction and breast-sparing reconstruction with miniflaps on the outcomes of oncoplastic breast surgery.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with immediate myocutaneous flap reconstruction and partial mastectomy with latissimus dorsi miniflap reconstruction (LDMF) for breast cancer. METHODS: Some 106 disease-free patients (57 SSM, 49 LDMF) who had breast reconstruction between 1991 and 1999 participated in this retrospective review. The mean duration of follow-up was 42 (range 6-102) months. Measured outcomes included surgical complications, functional disability, cosmetic result and psychological morbidity. RESULTS: SSM outcomes were less favourable than LDMF outcomes with regard to postoperative complications (14 versus 8 per cent), further surgical interventions (79 versus 12 per cent), nipple sensory loss (98 versus 2 per cent), restricted activities (73 versus 54 per cent) and cosmetic outcome by panel assessment. Anxiety about residual cancer and ease of breast self-examination were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: LDMF was associated with fewer adverse surgical and physical sequelae than SSM, without compromising local control or cosmetic outcome. Both operations were associated with low psychological morbidity.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Lung carcinoma after radiation therapy in women treated with lumpectomy or mastectomy for primary breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have demonstrated that women who receive adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) after mastectomy for breast carcinoma have an increased risk of a second primary lung carcinoma after 10 years, but, to the authors' knowledge, the risk associated with adjuvant RT after breast-conserving surgery (lumpectomy) has yet to be determined. The purpose of the current study was to confirm and extend earlier findings of the effects of postmastectomy RT on second primary lung carcinoma and to investigate the impact of postlumpectomy RT on second primary lung carcinoma in the same population and to compare the results. METHODS: The authors used data from the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program of the U.S. National Cancer Institute, encompassing approximately 10% of the U.S. population, from 1973 to 1998. Of the women with nonmetastatic invasive breast carcinoma, 194,981 had been treated with mastectomy and 65,560 were treated with lumpectomy. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the relative risk (RR) of a second primary lung carcinoma among women treated with RT compared with those who received surgery alone as a function of time interval since treatment and laterality for both types of surgery. RESULTS: Although no statistically significant elevation in risk for second primary lung carcinoma prior to 10 years was observed, the authors estimated a RR of 2.06 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.53-2.78) and 2.09 (95% CI, 1.50-2.90) for ipsilateral lung carcinoma at 10-14 years and 15+ years after postmastectomy RT, respectively, whereas no increased risk was observed for the contralateral lung. The excess risk of ipsilateral lung carcinoma after postmastectomy RT was found for all three major histologic subtypes of lung carcinoma (adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and small cell carcinoma). No increased risk of lung carcinoma was observed at 10-14 years after postlumpectomy RT for either lung. CONCLUSIONS: Postmastectomy RT was found to provide a moderate increase in risk for ipsilateral lung carcinoma starting 10 years after exposure; this increased risk is reported to persist to at least 20 years. Postlumpectomy RT does not appear to incur an increased risk. These findings should be reassuring to women treated with either type of RT, but the excess risk in the postmastectomy group should be considered in the choice between treatment options.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Patient selection criteria for conservation surgery versus mastectomy: Memorial Hospital breast service experience.

Breast cancer remains the most common noncutaneous malignancy of women. Although the incidence of the disease continues to rise, most women now present with early (stage I or II) disease. Breast conservation has been demonstrated to be equal in efficacy to mastectomy in such patients in six modern-day randomized trials. The utilization of breast conservation has been slow throughout the United States. At Memorial Hospital the utilization of breast conservation almost equals that of modified mastectomy in the treatment of 950+ annual primary operable cancers. Excellent local-regional control can be obtained with a defined surgical approach to the primary tumor and axillary nodes, radiotherapy to the breast with a boost to the primary site, and finally patient selection.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2005

Psychosocial effect of mastectomy versus conservative surgery in patients with early breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare the quality-of-life (QoL) and psychosocial changes in a group of patients with early breast cancer who underwent conservative surgery (BCS) or modified radical mastectomy(MRM). METHODS: Self-administered questionnaire assessing body image perception, social habits, sexual attraction and self-consciousness with relatives/friends, was randomly assigned to 125 patients (61 BCS, 64 MRM; aged 53 +/- 8 and 50 + 9 years, respectively, p = NS). RESULTS: MRM patients reported a significantly higher frequency of changes in body image perception and other related social behaviour such as avoiding going to the beach or using low-cut clothes, and reticence with friends. Conversely, no differences were found regarding sexuality, denial of the disease by the husband/partner, or concealing the disease from family members. Also, no significant differences were found between patients above and below the age of 50 years, for all variables studied after adjustment for surgical procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Modified radical mastectomy has a negative effect on body image perception and in social behaviour patterns of patients and with a concomitant decrease in QoL. The sexuality of the patient is not significantly affected.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Preventing relapses of breast cancer with modified radical mastectomy.

Better prevention and early detection have improved the percentage of early cancers among all the treated breast tumors to about 40%. After the first demonstration in Milan in 1981 that even conservative surgery can effectively prevent tumor relapses, radical and modified radical mastectomy was compared in 136 and 127 women, respectively. The groups were well stratified as regards age, menopause, T- and N-status. No difference was found in 10-yr survival (58.8 and 59.8%, respectively) or local relapses (9.5 and 10%, respectively) or general relapses. The median disease-free survival was 10 yr in both groups. The results suggest that in T1-T2a, N0-N1b M0 unilateral breast cancer relapses are prevented as effectively with modified radical as with radical mastectomy.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Living with mastectomy and breast conservation treatment: who suffers more?

Sixty-five patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy were compared with 55 breast conservation patients, all of whom were in stage I, II or III of breast cancer and were under treatment at an oncology clinic in northern Israel. The main findings indicate no differences between the groups in physical, psychosocial, marital or medical interaction, according to the CARE scale. These findings reflect the results of similar comparative studies conducted during the 1980s and 1990s as documented in the literature. Sexual interaction showed statistical differences favoring the women who had undergone mastectomies.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Ten-year results of a randomized trial comparing a conservative treatment to mastectomy in early breast cancer.

A randomized trial was conducted at the Institut Gustave-Roussy (IGR) between 1972 and 1980 comparing tumorectomy and breast irradiation with modified radical mastectomy. One hundred and seventy-nine patients with an infiltrating breast carcinoma up to 20 mm in diameter at macroscopic examination were included: 88 had conservative management, and 91 a mastectomy. All patients had a low-axillary dissection with immediate histological examination. For the patients with positive axillary nodes, a complete axillary dissection was undertaken. Overall survival, distant metastasis, contralateral breast cancer and locoregional recurrence rates were not significantly different between the two treatment groups.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1989

Local-regional recurrence in breast cancer after mastectomy and adriamycin-based adjuvant chemotherapy: evaluation of the role of postoperative radiotherapy.

In an attempt to determine whether patients treated for breast cancer with radical or modified radical mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy benefit from postoperative radiotherapy, 400 women with Stages II-III breast cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy based on the combination of Adriamycin and Cytoxan were analyzed retrospectively. Prognostic features which predicted a high risk of isolated local-regional relapse were identified. Thirty-eight percent of these patients were also treated with postoperative radiation in addition to adjuvant chemotherapy and were compared to those patients treated only with adjuvant chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 60 months, 15% of the patients reviewed developed local-regional disease as the first site of relapse without concommitant systemic relapse. When examined univariately, stage of disease, tumor size, nodal status, and estrogen receptor status were strong prognostic variables. Age, cell type, location of tumor within the breast, menstrual status, radiation dose, and type of treatment were not significantly related to isolated local-regional relapse. However, patients who received postoperative radiation were significantly more advanced in their disease condition. When the factors were examined multivariately, the type of treatment along with stage of disease were found to be statistically significant prognostic indicators. About half of the patients were tested for estrogen receptor status. Multivariate analysis performed on this subset of patients showed that estrogen receptor status, type of treatment, and axillary nodal status were significant predictors of the risk of isolated local-regional relapse. This study suggests that patients treated with mastectomy and Adriamycin and Cytoxan-based adjuvant chemotherapy may benefit from postoperative radiation in reducing the risk of isolated local-regional recurrence.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1992

Significance of local recurrence after mastectomy for breast cancer.

In a retrospective study 678 patients who underwent (modified) radical mastectomy between 1970 and 1986 were analysed. By comparing the groups of patients who experienced local recurrence, regional recurrence or distant metastasis during follow-up with patients who remained free of disease, we have tried to gain some insight into the significance of local recurrence. By looking at the prognostic factors and the disease-free period there is hardly any difference between the patients with either a local, regional or distant recurrence. Actuarial survival of patients with local recurrence is slightly better than the survival of patients with distant metastasis (P = 0.009). From our results and from the literature we conclude that an isolated local recurrence after mastectomy for breast cancer is, in most cases, a first manifestation of metastatic disease. Probably only a minority of the local recurrences is caused by tumour cells left behind in the operation field.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Multiple re-excisions versus mastectomy in patients with persistent residual disease following breast conservation surgery.

BACKGROUND: Persistently involved margins following breast conservation surgery (BCS) create a diagnostic dilemma regarding the recommendation of further BCS or mastectomy. METHODS: A retrospective review of 276 breast cancer patients who underwent BCS and required additional surgical treatment between 1990-2002 was performed. RESULTS: For treatment of persistently involved margins, 63% of subjects underwent re-excision the first time, 49% the second time, and 37% the third time. The incidence of residual carcinoma increased linearly with the number of initially involved margins (P = .03). Ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) or infiltrating lobular carcinoma (IFLC) primary histology was associated with a higher rate of residual cancer compared to invasive ductal carcinoma (IFDC) (62% vs. 69% vs. 54%, respectively, P = .56). A trend towards an increased risk of residual cancer in primary tumors > or =2 cm versus tumors under 2 cm was also evident (63%% vs. 50%, respectively, P = .38). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of patients repeatedly selected BCS over mastectomy. It is important to realistically discuss the probability of definitive resection with patients who are undergoing breast conservation with re-excision.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1989

Psychosocial outcomes of breast cancer therapies: lumpectomy versus mastectomy.

The psychological status of 50 patients who had been treated for breast cancer was assessed an average of 21 months after treatment. The patients were grouped according to major treatment modalities: mastectomy with breast reconstruction, mastectomy without breast reconstruction, or lumpectomy. Lumpectomy patients had a significantly more intact body image (p less than .008) and a greater sense of sexual desirability (p less than .009) than patients in the other groups. The patients did not differ on frequency of sexual relations or on emotional symptomatology. The results of this study generally validate those found in comparable studies showing that lumpectomy promotes a more intact body image but that no surgical procedure either produces or inhibits psychological symptomatology.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Adjuvant radiotherapy after mastectomy for pT1-pT2 node negative (pN0) breast cancer: is it worth the effort?

PURPOSE: Postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for pT1-2 pN0 breast cancer was the standard treatment in our department. Since little data on the importance of RT in this subgroup are known, we reviewed the clinical records with regard to overall survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 1984 until 2000, 1789 files were submitted to retrospective analyses; 731 had a pT1 (n=427) or pT2 (n=304) pN0 lesion. They were treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) (n=343) or mastectomy (ME) (n=388), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and post-operative RT. The outcome was analyzed and compared with the patients included in the SEER-Data 1988-1997 (NCI-Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results, release 2000) that were treated according to the standard treatment: BCS+ALND+RT, or ME+ALND no RT. RESULTS: The actuarial overall survival (OS) at 5 and 10 years after BCS was 93.3% and 85.1% for pT1 and 88.3% and 75.4% for pT2 tumors. These results are comparable with the SEER (93.9%, 84.9% for pT1, and 87.3%, 76.7% for pT2, respectively). For our ME patients the OS was 91.8% and 79.9%, respectively (pT1 at 5 and 10 years, respectively), and 83.6% and 70.4% (pT2 at 5 and 10 years). In the SEER data the analyses resulted in 89.3% and 73.8% (pT1), and 81.1% and 63.5% (pT2), respectively. DISCUSSION: Although both databases are retrospective, the comparable survival in BCS patients pleads for the similarity of the two populations. The better OS observed in ME patients treated with RT compared to the SEER patients argues in favor of a benefit due to adjuvant radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy after mastectomy might improve survival in low-risk node negative patients. Our data shows an absolute benefit of between 2.5% and 6.9% OS in favor of post ME radiotherapy, compared to the SEER data.

Actuarial Analysis↗