Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “LexA Repressor Protein”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 649 records · Page 36Linked to original sources

Isolation and characterization of LexA mutant repressors with enhanced DNA binding affinity.

The LexA repressor from Escherichia coli is a sequence-specific DNA binding protein that shows no pronounced sequence homology with any of the known structural motifs involved in DNA binding. Since little is known about how this protein interacts with DNA, we have selected and characterized a great number of intragenic, second-site mutations which restored at least partially the activity of LexA mutant repressors deficient in DNA binding. In 47 cases, the suppressor effect of these mutations was due to an Ind- phenotype leading presumably to a stabilization of the mutant protein. With one exception, these second-site mutations are all found in a small cluster (amino acid residues 80 to 85) including the LexA cleavage site between amino acid residues 84 and 85 and include both already known Ind- mutations as well as new variants like GN80, GS80, VL82 and AV84. The remaining 26 independently isolated second-site suppressor mutations all mapped within the amino-terminal DNA binding domain of LexA, at positions 22 (situated in the turn between helix 1 and helix 2) and positions 57, 59, 62, 71 and 73. These latter amino acid residues are all found beyond helix 3, in a region where we have previously identified a cluster of LexA (Def) mutant repressors. In several cases the parental LexA (Def) mutation has been removed by subcloning or site-directed mutagenesis. With one exception, these LexA variants show tighter in vivo repression than the LexA wild-type repressor. The most strongly improved variant (LexA EK71, i.e. Glu71----Lys) that shows an about threefold increased repression rate in vivo, was purified and its binding to a short consensus operator DNA fragment studied using a modified nitrocellulose filter binding assay. As expected from the in vivo data, LexA EK71 interacts more tightly with both operator and (more dramatically) with non-operator DNA. A determination of the equilibrium association constants of LexA EK71 and LexA wild-type as a function of monovalent salt concentration suggests that LexA EK71 might form an additional ionic interaction with operator DNA as compared to the LexA wild-type repressor. A comparison of the binding of LexA to a non-operator DNA fragment further shows that LexA interacts with the consensus operator very selectively with a specificity factor of Ks/Kns of 1.4 x 10(6) under near-physiological salt conditions.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

The SOS regulatory system: control of its state by the level of RecA protease.

Our current understanding of the SOS regulatory system suggests that it can exist in two extreme states: in the repressed state, LexA protein is active, and it represses a particular set of genes called SOS genes. In the induced state, which results from various impairments to DNA replication, LexA repressor is cleaved by the specific protease activity of the RecA protein; in consequence, the SOS genes are derepressed and they express various functions that are believed to aid cell survival in induced cells. Since high levels of RecA protease activity turn on this system, it seems plausible that the level of protease activity will also control the transitions between the two states of the system. In order to assess the in vivo level of protease activity, antibody techniques were used to study the stability of LexA repressor during various phases of the SOS regulatory cycle. Repressor was reasonably stable in the repressed state, but it was degraded within a few minutes after an inducing treatment. Cleavage depended upon the RecA protease activity and resulted in the same products as seen in vitro. Cleavage preceded, and did not depend upon, derepression of any SOS gene. During the transition to the repressed state, LexA repressor became increasingly stable with time, suggesting that as DNA damage was repaired the level of protease declined. This decline depended upon derepression of the regulatory system, consistent with the belief that an inducing signal, resulting from DNA damage, reversibly activates the RecA protease and is removed by the action of one or more SOS functions. At low levels of DNA damage, a subinduced state was observed in which repressor level was reduced by a low level of cleavage. These data indicate that the level of RecA protease activity controls the state of the system and the transitions between its two states.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Activation of recA protein: the salt-induced structural transition.

Purified recA protein is induced by high salt concentrations to hydrolyse ATP even in the absence of DNA. By small angle neutron scattering we show that this salt activation results from a structural transition of the protein filament in the presence of ATP gamma S from the inactive, compact form (a helical polymer of pitch 70 A and cross-sectional radius of gyration Rc 40 A) to the open form (a helical filament of pitch 95 A and Rc 35 A, which are the same structural parameters as in the ATPase active complex with DNA and ATP), without detectable change in the degree of association. We conclude that activation of recA is due to the same structural change whether induced by the binding of DNA or by salt. Indeed, the other enzymatic activity of recA, the proteolytic cleavage of the lexA repressor, is found to be inducible by the same salt concentrations as those of the structural transition.

Acetates↗

SOS-inducible DNA repair proteins, RuvA and RuvB, of Escherichia coli: functional interactions between RuvA and RuvB for ATP hydrolysis and renaturation of the cruciform structure in supercoiled DNA.

The ruv operon is induced by treatments that damage DNA and is regulated by the LexA repressor. It encodes two proteins, RuvA and RuvB, that are involved in DNA repair, recombination in RecE and RecF pathways, and mutagenesis. RuvB protein was previously purified and has ATP-binding activity and weak ATPase activity. To study the biochemical properties of RuvA and its interaction with RuvB, we purified RuvA protein to near homogeneity from an over-producing strain. RuvA bound more efficiently to single-stranded DNA than to double-stranded DNA. RuvA bound to DNA greatly enhanced the ATPase activity of RuvB; the enhancing effect of various forms of DNA was in the order of supercoiled DNA greater than single-stranded DNA greater than linear double-stranded DNA. UV irradiation further enhanced the ATPase stimulatory effect of supercoiled DNA dose dependently. The RuvA-RuvB complex has an activity that renatures the cruciform structure in supercoiled DNA. From these experiments and previous work, we infer that the RuvA-RuvB complex may promote branch migration in recombination and may correct irregular structures in DNA, such as cruciforms and hairpins, to facilitate DNA repair using ATP as the energy source.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

Preferential interactions of the Escherichia coli LexA repressor with anions and protons are coupled to binding the recA operator.

The binding of Escherichia coli LexA repressor to the recA operator was examined as a function of the concentration of NaCl, KCl, NaF, and MgCl2 at pH 7.5, 21 degrees C. The effects of pH at 100 mM NaCl were also examined. Changes both in the qualitative appearance of the binding isotherms and in the magnitude of the apparent binding affinity with changes in solution conditions suggest that binding of anions and protons by LexA repressor is linked to oligomerization and/or operator binding. Binding of LexA repressor to the recA operator in the presence of NaCl ranging from 25 to 400 mM at picomolar DNA concentration showed a broad, apparently noncooperative, binding isotherm. Binding of LexA repressor in NaF at the same [DNA] yielded binding isotherms with a narrow transition, reflecting an apparently cooperative binding process. Also, the apparent binding affinity was weaker in NaF than in NaCl. Furthermore, the binding affinity and also the apparent binding mode, cooperative vs noncooperative, were pH dependent. The binding affinity of LexA repressor for operator was greatest near neutral pH. The apparent binding mode was noncooperative at pH 7-9 but was cooperative at pH 6 or 9.3. These observations suggest that the specific cation and anion composition and concentrations must be considered in understanding the details of regulation of the SOS system.

Anions↗

LexA repressor and iron uptake regulator from Escherichia coli: new members of the CAP-like DNA binding domain superfamily.

Comparison of structures can reveal surprising connections between protein families and provide new insights into the relationship between sequence, structure and function. The solution structure of LexA repressor from Escherichia coli reveals an unexpected structural similarity to a widespread class of prokaryotic and eukaryotic regulatory proteins, which is typified by catabolite gene activator protein (CAP). The use of combined sequence profiles allows the identification of two new prokaryotic members of the superfamily: listeriolysin regulatory protein (PrfA) and ferric uptake regulatory protein (Fur). LexA, PrfA and Fur are the first examples of prokaryotic regulatory proteins in which DNA recognition is mediated by a variant of the classical helix-turn-helix motif, with an insertion in the turn region.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Interaction of the repressors Nrg1 and Nrg2 with the Snf1 protein kinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The Snf1 protein kinase is essential for the transcription of glucose-repressed genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We identified Nrg2 as a protein that interacts with Snf1 in the two-hybrid system. Nrg2 is a C(2)H(2) zinc-finger protein that is homologous to Nrg1, a repressor of the glucose- and Snf1-regulated STA1 (glucoamylase) gene. Snf1 also interacts with Nrg1 in the two-hybrid system and co-immunoprecipitates with both Nrg1 and Nrg2 from cell extracts. A LexA fusion to Nrg2 represses transcription from a promoter containing LexA binding sites, indicating that Nrg2 also functions as a repressor. An Nrg1 fusion to green fluorescent protein is localized to the nucleus, and this localization is not regulated by carbon source. Finally, we show that VP16 fusions to Nrg1 and Nrg2 allow low-level expression of SUC2 in glucose-grown cells, and we present evidence that Nrg1 and Nrg2 contribute to glucose repression of the DOG2 gene. These results suggest that Nrg1 and Nrg2 are direct or indirect targets of the Snf1 kinase and function in glucose repression of a subset of Snf1-regulated genes.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Stimulation of RecA-mediated cleavage of phage phi 80 cI repressor by deoxydinucleotides.

The presence of either deoxyguanylyl-(3'----5')-deoxyguanosine (d(G-G] or deoxyadenylyl-(3'----5')-deoxyguanosine (d(A-G] greatly stimulates cleavage of the phage phi 80 cI repressor mediated by the Escherichia coli RecA protein in vitro. No other deoxydinucleoside monophosphate or riboguanylyl-(3'----5')-guanosine (r(G-G] affects the cleavage reaction. Neither the cleavage site of the phi 80 cI repressor nor the requirement for single-stranded DNA and ATP for cleavage is altered by d(G-G). Photoaffinity labeling experiments with 32P-labeled 5'-phosphoryl deoxyguanylyl deoxyguanosine (pd(G-G], which also stimulates cleavage, show that pd(G-G) bound to the repressor under the conditions in which the repressor is cleaved by RecA protein. The binding increases the affinity of the repressor for RecA protein and thus greatly stimulates repressor cleavage. The cleavage reactions of LexA and lambda cI repressors by RecA protein are not affected by d(G-G).

Bacterial Proteins↗

LexA represses CTXphi transcription by blocking access of the alpha C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase to promoter DNA.

CTXPhi is a Vibrio cholerae-specific temperate filamentous phage that encodes cholera toxin. CTXPhi lysogens can be induced with DNA damage-inducing agents such as UV light, leading to the release of CTXPhi virions and the rapid dissemination of cholera toxin genes to new V. cholerae hosts. This environmental regulation is directly mediated by LexA, the host-encoded global SOS transcription factor. LexA and a phage-encoded repressor, RstR, both repress transcription from P(rstA), the primary CTXPhi promoter. Because the LexA binding site is located upstream of the core P(rstA) promoter and overlaps with A-tract sequences, we speculated that LexA represses P(rstA) by occluding a promoter UP element, a binding site for the C-terminal domain of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase (RNAP) (alphaCTD). Using in vitro transcription assays, we have shown that the LexA binding site stimulates maximal rstA transcription in the absence of any added factors. The alphaCTD of RNAP is required for this stimulation, demonstrating that the LexA site contains, or overlaps with, a promoter UP element. LexA represses rstA transcription by normal RNAP but fails to repress rstA transcription catalyzed by RNAP lacking the alphaCTD. DNase I footprint analysis mapped the alphaCTD binding site to the upstream promoter region that includes the LexA binding site. The addition of free alpha subunits blocked the binding of LexA to rstA promoter DNA, indicating that LexA and the alphaCTD directly compete for binding to their respective sites. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a repressor blocking transcription initiation by occluding a promoter UP element.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Proteolytic activation of UmuD and MucA proteins for SOS mutagenesis.

SOS mutagenesis in Escherichia coli requires the functions of the umuD, C genes, or their functional analogues mucA, B derived from a plasmid pKM101, and the recA gene. However, mere derepression of these SOS genes does not increase the ability of the cell to perform mutagenesis. Activation of RecA protein to a form (RecA*) that mediates cleavage of the LexA repressor is required for mutagenesis. We present evidence that UmuD and MucA are proteolytically processed by RecA* and that the processed products are the active forms involved in mutagenesis.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Differential cleavage of LexA and UmuD mediated by recA Pro67 mutants: implications for common LexA and UmuD binding sites on RecA.

In Escherichia coli, RecA-mediated cleavage of LexA repressor is a key regulatory event required for expression of SOS genes involved in the repair of DNA damage. RecA also mediates the cleavage of UmuD protein to UmuD, a form active in SOS mutagenesis. To determine whether LexA and UmuD have common binding determinants on RecA, we have compared the ability of several recA mutants to function in the cleavage of LexA versus UmuD in vivo. The data reveal that while some recA mutations at Pro67 have a similar effect on LexA and UmuD cleavage, others have striking differential effects. For example, a Pro67-->Trp mutation results in a high level of constitutive cleavage of both proteins. However, Pro67-->Asp and Glu mutations promote constitutive cleavage of LexA and reduce induction of UmuD cleavage to just 5 to 10% of wild-type activity. In contrast, Pro67-->Arg prevents LexA cleavage while allowing nearly 50% of wild-type induction of UmuD cleavage. These results are consistent with the idea that Pro67 is located at a site in the nucleoprotein filament where both LexA and UmuD contact RecA.

Bacterial Proteins↗

LexA protein of Escherichia coli represses expression of the Tn5 transposase gene.

The LexA protein of Escherichia coli represses expression of a variety of genes that, by definition, constitute the SOS regulon. Genetic evidence suggests that Tn5 transposition is also regulated by the product of the lexA gene (C.-T. Kuan, S.-K. Liu, and I. Tessman, Genetics 128:45-57, 1991). We now show that the LexA protein represses expression of the tnp gene, located in the IS50R component of Tn5, which encodes a transposase, and that LexA does not repress expression of the IS50R inh gene, which encodes an inhibitor of transposition. Elimination of LexA resulted in increased expression of the tnp gene by a factor of 2.7 +/- 0.4, as indicated by the activity of a lacZ gene fused to the tnp gene. LexA protein retarded the electrophoretic movement of a 101-bp segment of IS50R DNA that contained a putative LexA protein-binding site in the tnp promoter; the interaction between the LexA repressor and the promoter region of the tnp gene appears to be relatively weak. These features show that the IS50R tnp gene is a member of the SOS regulon.

Bacterial Proteins↗

DNA sequence analysis of the recA genes from Proteus vulgaris, Erwinia carotovora, Shigella flexneri and Escherichia coli B/r.

The complete nucleotide sequences of the recA genes from Escherichia coli B/r, Shigella flexneri, Erwinia carotovora and Proteus vulgaris were determined. The DNA sequence of the coding region of the E. coli B/r gene contained a single nucleotide change compared with the E. coli K12 gene sequence whereas the S. flexneri gene differed at 7 residues. In both cases, the predicted proteins were identical in primary structure to the E. coli K12 RecA protein. The DNA sequences of the recA genes from E. carotovora and P. vulgaris were 80% and 74% homologous, respectively, to the E. coli K12 gene. The predicted amino acid sequences of the E. carotovora and P. vulgaris RecA proteins were 91% and 85% identical respectively, to that of E. coli K12. The RecA proteins from both P. vulgaris and E. carotovora diverged significantly in sequence in the last 50 residues whereas they showed striking conservation throughout the first 300 amino acids which include an ATP-binding region and a subunit interaction domain. A putative LexA repressor binding site was localized upstream of each of the heterologous genes.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

Duplication mutation as an SOS response in Escherichia coli: enhanced duplication formation by a constitutively activated RecA.

The SOS response in Escherichia coli involves the induction of a multioperon regulatory system, which copes with the presence of DNA lesions that interfere with DNA replication. Induction depends on activation of the RecA protein to cleave the LexA repressor of SOS operons. In addition to inducible DNA repair, the SOS system produces a large increase in the frequency of point mutations. To examine the possibility that other types of mutations are induced as part of the SOS response, we have studied the production of tandem duplications. To avoid the complications of indirect effects of the DNA lesions, we have activated the SOS response by a constitutive mutation in the recA gene, recA730. The introduction of the recA730 mutation results in an increase in duplications in the range of tenfold or greater, as judged by two different criteria. Based on its genetic requirements, the pathway for induced duplication formation is distinct from the point mutation pathway and also differs from the major normal recombination pathway. The induction of pathways for both duplications and point mutations shows that the SOS system produces a broad mutagenic response. We have suggested previously that many types of mutations might be induced by severe environmental stress, thereby enhancing genetic variation in an endangered population.

DNA Repair↗

A mutant LexA repressor harboring a cleavage motif cysteine-glycine remains inducible.

Using site-directed mutagenesis of the lexA gene we have changed the amino acid Ala-84 of the LexA repressor for a cysteine. The reason for this change was the striking homology between LexA and UmuD and the comparable size of the two amino acid side chains. Using an in vivo repression/induction assay it is shown that the LexA-Cys-84 mutant remains inducible by mitomycin C and UV irradiation essentially in the same way as the wild-type repressor.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Signal transduction and transcriptional regulation by glucocorticoid receptor-LexA fusion proteins.

The glucocorticoid receptor regulates transcriptional initiation upon binding to its cognate hormone. A series of fusion genes was constructed to examine the mechanism of hormone-regulated transcriptional enhancement. The DNA binding domain of the bacterial LexA repressor was fused to receptor derivatives lacking the region that is necessary and sufficient for specific DNA binding and transcriptional enhancement at glucocorticoid response elements (GRE's). The resultant hybrid proteins activated transcription from promoters linked to the lex operator. Enhancement still required hormone binding by the hybrid receptor regardless of the exact positioning of the LexA binding domain within the protein. Thus, the unliganded hormone binding domain of the receptor acts as a strong but reversible inhibitor of receptor activity in a manner that is independent of the means by which the receptor recognizes DNA. The results also show directly that the receptor contains at least one "enhancement domain" other than that overlapping the GRE binding region; the second domain, enh2, occupies a region near the receptor amino terminus.

Bacterial Proteins↗

RecA protein of Escherichia coli has a third essential role in SOS mutator activity.

The DNA damage-inducible SOS response of Escherichia coli includes an error-prone translesion DNA replication activity responsible for SOS mutagenesis. In certain recA mutant strains, in which the SOS response is expressed constitutively, SOS mutagenesis is manifested as a mutator activity. Like UV mutagenesis, SOS mutator activity requires the products of the umuDC operon and depends on RecA protein for at least two essential activities: facilitating cleavage of LexA repressor to derepress SOS genes and processing UmuD protein to produce a fragment (UmuD') that is active in mutagenesis. To determine whether RecA has an additional role in SOS mutator activity, spontaneous mutability (tryptophan dependence to independence) was measured in a family of nine lexA-defective strains, each having a different recA allele, transformed or not with a plasmid that overproduces either UmuD' alone or both UmuD' and UmuC. The magnitude of SOS mutator activity in these strains, which require neither of the two known roles of RecA protein, was strongly dependent on the particular recA allele that was present. We conclude that UmuD'C does not determine the mutation rate independently of RecA and that RecA has a third essential role in SOS mutator activity.

Alleles↗

The Tum protein of coliphage 186 is an antirepressor.

The tum gene of coliphage 186, encoded on a LexA controlled operon, is essential for UV induction of a 186 prophage. Primer extension analysis is used to confirm that Tum is the sole phage function required for prophage induction and that it acts against the maintenance repressor, CI, to relieve repression of the lytic promoters, pR and pB, and thereby bring about lytic development. In vitro experiments with purified proteins demonstrate that Tum prevents CI binding to its operator sites. Tum does not compete with CI for binding sites on DNA, and unlike RecA mediated induction of lambda prophage, the action of Tum on CI is reversible. Mechanisms by which Tum may act against CI are discussed.

Bacterial Proteins↗