Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cerebellar Cortex”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 649 records · Page 36Linked to original sources
PubMed1985

Human cerebellar cortex possesses high affinity binding sites for [3H]somatostatin.

Somatostatin binding sites have been identified in the human brain using [4-3H-(Phe6)]-somatostatin-14. In contrast to that of the rat, the human cerebellar cortex possesses a high density of somatostatin binding sites, comparable to that found in either the rat or human cerebral cortex. Autoradiographic localisation of somatostatin binding sites in the human cerebellum reveals that the highest density is associated with the granule cell layer.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

The importance of cerebellar cortex and facial nucleus in acquisition and retention of eyeblink/NM conditioning: evidence for critical unilateral regulation of the conditioned response.

Experiment 1 examined acquisition of the classically conditioned eyeblink response in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) during reversible cooling lesions of the cerebellar cortex (CX), facial nucleus (FN), or lateral parvocellular reticular formation (RF). Retention was then evaluated during periods of training during reversible cooling lesions and without cooling in rabbits that had acquired the conditioned response. We found that cooling the CX did not prevent acquisition, but did retard the acquisition rate. Cooling the FN during acquisition prevented the expression of the unconditioned and conditioned response, but did not prevent the acquisition when assessed during subsequent training without cooling. Cooling the RF had no effect on the acquisition or expression of the conditioned response. During subsequent retention testing, in well-trained animals, cooling the CX did not abolish the learned response. Cooling the FN abolished both the conditioned and the unconditioned response. The results from Experiment 1 indicate that the CX is more important for acquisition than retention of the conditioned response. The FN is not important for the acquisition of the conditioned response, but is essential for the expression of the conditioned and unconditioned response. Experiment 2 examined bilateral recordings from the cerebellum in well-trained rabbits, before and during interpositus or FN cooling. We found that cooling the interpositus abolished all learning related activity in the ipsilateral or contralateral cerebellum, but did not affect the stimulus evoked responses. Cooling the FN did not abolish stimulus evoked activity or learning related activity in the cerebellum. The results emphasize the critical importance of the ipsilateral cerebellum in classical eyeblink conditioning and suggest that the memory trace for this type of learning is mediated by unilateral circuitry.

Animals↗