Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cannabinoids”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 649 records · Page 36Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

The cannabinoid antagonist SR141716A facilitates memory acquisition and consolidation in the mouse elevated T-maze.

Delta9-THC and synthetic cannabinoids produce memory impairment in humans as well as in laboratory animals. The high concentration of cannabinoid CB1 receptors and the presence of endocannabinoids in the hippocampus suggest that a cannabinoid neurochemical system may play a role in learning and memory processes. Thus, the objective of the present work was to study the effect of the cannabinoid antagonist SR141716A (SR) on memory acquisition, consolidation and retrieval in a recently developed elevated T-maze (ETM) model of anxiety and memory. In addition, we investigated whether pre-training SR administration was capable of reversing scopolamine-induced memory impairment. Adult male mice were exposed to the closed arm as many times as necessary for the animals to reach the avoidance criterion of remaining in the closed arm for 300 s; they were then tested (exposed to the closed arm) 24 h and 7 days after the training. SR (0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 mg/kg) was administered i.p. 20 min before the training, immediately after training or 20 min before the test in the mice. The elevated plus-maze (EPM) was used to investigate a possible influence of SR on locomotion and on the anxiety-related behavior. SR provoked memory improvement, which was observed when the drug was administered before (effect on memory acquisition/consolidation) or immediately after the training (effect on memory consolidation), but not when the drug was administered before the test (effect on memory retrieval). Also, SR administration reversed scopolamine-induced amnesia. These effects were observed in the absence of changes in locomotion or anxiety levels. Our results demonstrate that the blockade of cannabinoid receptors may improve memory acquisition and consolidation in the ETM model.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Cannabinoids prevent the acute hyperthermia and partially protect against the 5-HT depleting effects of MDMA ("Ecstasy") in rats.

Cannabinoid-MDMA interactions were examined in male Wistar rats. MDMA (4 x 5 mg/kg or 2 x 10 mg/kg over 4 h on each of 2 days) was administered with or without Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (4 x 2.5 mg/kg), the synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist CP 55,940 (2 x 0.1 or 0.2 mg/kg) or the cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR 141716 (2 x 5 mg/kg). Co-administered Delta 9-THC and CP 55,940 but not SR 141716 prevented MDMA-induced hyperthermia, causing a powerful hypothermia. Co-administered Delta 9-THC, CP 55,940 and SR 141716 all tended to decrease MDMA-induced hyperactivity. Co-administered Delta 9-THC provided protection against the long-term increases in anxiety seen in the emergence test, but not the social interaction test, 6 weeks after MDMA treatment. Co-administered Delta 9-THC and CP 55,940, but not SR 141716, partly prevented the long-term 5-HT and 5-HIAA depletion caused by MDMA in various brain regions. SR 141716 administered with CP 55,940 and MDMA prevented the hypothermic response to the CP 55,940/MDMA combination but did not alter the CP 55,940 attenuation of MDMA-induced 5-HT depletion. These results suggest a partial protective effect of co-administered cannabinoid receptor agonists on MDMA-induced 5-HT depletion and long-term anxiety. This action appears to operate independently of cannabinoid CB1 receptors.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Hypothesis: cannabinoid therapy for the treatment of gliomas?

Gliomas, in particular glioblastoma multiforme or grade IV astrocytoma, are the most frequent class of malignant primary brain tumours and one of the most aggressive forms of cancer. Current therapeutic strategies for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme are usually ineffective or just palliative. During the last few years, several studies have shown that cannabinoids-the active components of the plant Cannabis sativa and their derivatives--slow the growth of different types of tumours, including gliomas, in laboratory animals. Cannabinoids induce apoptosis of glioma cells in culture via sustained ceramide accumulation, extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation and Akt inhibition. In addition, cannabinoid treatment inhibits angiogenesis of gliomas in vivo. Remarkably, cannabinoids kill glioma cells selectively and can protect non-transformed glial cells from death. These and other findings reviewed here might set the basis for a potential use of cannabinoids in the management of gliomas.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Delta(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol-induced desensitization of cannabinoid-mediated inhibition of synaptic transmission between hippocampal neurons in culture.

Prolonged exposure to cannabinoids results in desensitization of cannabinoid receptors. Here, we compared the desensitization produced by the partial agonist, Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) to that produced by the full agonist Win55,212-2 on cannabinoid-mediated inhibition of glutamatergic synaptic transmission. Synaptic activity between rat hippocampal neurons was determined from network-driven increases in the intracellular Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i) spikes). To assess the effects of prolonged treatment, cultures were incubated with cannabinoids, washed in 0.5% fatty-acid-free bovine serum albumin to ensure the removal of the lipophilic drug and then tested for inhibition of [Ca(2+)](i) spiking by Win55,212-2. In control experiments, 0.1 microM Win55,212-2 inhibited [Ca(2+)](i) spiking by 93 +/- 5%. Win55,212-2 produced significantly less inhibition of [Ca(2+)](i) spiking following 18-24h treatment with 1 microM THC (48 +/- 5%) or treatment with 1 microM Win55,212-2 (29 +/- 6%). Thus, THC produced significantly less functional desensitization than Win55,212-2. The desensitization produced by THC was maximal at 0.3 microM, remained stable between 1 and 7 days of preincubation and shifted the EC(50) of acute inhibition by Win55,212-2 from 27 to 251 nM. Differences in the long-term effects of cannabinoid receptor agonists on synaptic transmission may prove important for evaluating their therapeutic and abuse potential.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Antinociception and modulation of rostral ventromedial medulla neuronal activity by local microinfusion of a cannabinoid receptor agonist.

Systemic administration of a cannabinoid agonist produces antinociception through the activation of pain modulating neurons in the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM). The aim of the present study was to determine how a cannabinoid receptor agonist acting directly within the RVM affects neuronal activity to produce behaviorally measurable antinociception. In lightly anesthetized rats, two types of RVM neurons have been defined based on changes in tail flick-related activity. On-cells increase firing (on-cell burst), whereas off-cells cease firing (off-cell pause), just prior to a tail flick. The cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 was microinfused directly into the RVM while monitoring tail flick latencies and on- and off-cell activity. Microinfusion of WIN55,212-2 (2.0 microg/microl and 0.4 microg/microl) reduced the tail flick-related on-cell burst, decreased the duration of the off-cell pause, and increased off-cell ongoing activity. These changes were prevented by co-infusing the CB1 receptor antagonist, SR141716A (0.35 microg/microl), with WIN55,212-2 (0.4 microg/microl). Furthermore, 2.0 microg/microl WIN55,212-2 delayed the onset of the off-cell pause and increased tail flick latencies. Microinfusion of WIN55,212-2 to brain regions caudal or lateral to the RVM had no effect on RVM neuronal activity or tail flick latencies. These results indicate that cannabinoids act directly within the RVM to affect off-cell activity, providing one mechanism by which cannabinoids produce antinociception.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed2004

GABAA receptors modulate cannabinoid-evoked hypothermia.

Cannabinoids evoke hypothermia by stimulating central CB(1) receptors. GABA induces hypothermia via GABA(A) or GABA(B) receptor activation. CB(1) receptor activation increases GABA release in the hypothalamus, a central locus for thermoregulation, suggesting that cannabinoid and GABA systems may be functionally linked in body temperature regulation. We investigated whether GABA receptors modulate the hypothermic actions of [4,5-dihydro-2-methyl-4(4-morpholinylmethyl)-1-(1-naphthalenyl-carbonyl)-6H-pyrrolo[3,2,1ij]quinolin-6-one] (WIN 55212-2), a selective cannabinoid agonist, in male Sprague-Dawley rats. WIN 55212-2 (2.5 mg/kg im) produced a rapid hypothermia that peaked 45-90 min postinjection. The hypothermia was attenuated by bicuculline (2 mg/kg ip), a GABA(A) antagonist. However, SCH 50911 (1-10 mg/kg ip), a GABA(B) blocker, did not antagonize the hypothermia. Neither bicuculline (2 mg/kg) nor SCH 50911 (10 mg/kg) by itself altered body temperature. We also investigated a possible role for CB(1) receptors in GABA-generated hypothermia. Muscimol (2.5 mg/kg ip), a GABA(A) agonist, or baclofen (5 mg/kg ip), a GABA(B) agonist, evoked a significant hypothermia. Blockade of CB(1) receptors with SR141716A (2.5 mg/kg im) did not antagonize muscimol- or baclofen-induced hypothermia, indicating that GABA-evoked hypothermia does not contain a CB(1)-sensitive component. Our results implicate GABA(A) receptors in the hypothermic actions of cannabinoids and provide further evidence of a functional link between cannabinoid and GABA systems.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Molecular and cellular basis of cannabinoid and opioid interactions.

Cannabinoids and opioids have been shown to possess several similar pharmacological effects, including analgesia and stimulation of brain circuitry that are believed to underlie drug addiction and reward. In recent years, these phenomena have supported the possible existence of functional links in the mechanisms of action of both types of drugs. The present review addresses the recent advances in the study of biochemical and molecular mechanisms underlying opioid and cannabinoid interaction. Several hypothesis have been formulated to explain this cross-modulation including the release of opioid peptides by cannabinoids or endocannabinoids by opioids and interaction at the level of receptor and/or their signal transduction mechanisms. Moreover it is important to consider that the nature of cannabinoid and opioid interaction might differ in the brain circuits mediating reward and in those mediating other pharmacological properties, such as antinociception. While in vitro studies point to the presence of interaction at various steps along the signal transduction pathway, studies in intact animals are frequently contradictory pending on the used species and the adopted protocol. The presence of reciprocal alteration in receptor density and efficiency as well as the modification in opioid/cannabinoid endogenous systems often do not reflect the behavioral results. Further studies are needed since a better knowledge of the opioid-cannabinoid interaction may lead to exciting therapeutic possibilities.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Signaling pathways involved in the development of cannabinoid tolerance.

Considerable plasticity exists in the endogenous cannabinoid system, as evidenced by the high degree of tolerance that develops following repetitive exposure to exogenously administered cannabinoid receptor agonists. This tolerance development is accompanied by cannabinoid CB(1) receptor downregulation and attenuation of G-protein activation. The biological processes responsible for CB(1) receptor downregulation remain to be fully understood. However, recent evidence suggests that several protein kinases participate in the development of cannabinoid tolerance. These observations implicate a role for protein kinases in cannabinoid signaling pathways. It remains to be established whether these protein kinases are directly involved in CB(1) receptor regulation or whether they contribute to tolerance by modulating additional signaling pathways.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Behavioral suppression induced by cannabinoids is due to activation of the arachidonic acid cascade in rats.

Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the principle psychoactive ingredient of marijuana and produces various psychoactive effects through the brain cannabinoid (CB1) receptor. The CB1 receptor belongs to the seven-transmembrane domain family of G-protein-coupled receptors and is involved in the arachidonic acid cascade in the brain. Few reports have attempted to clarify the functional role of endogenous cannabinoid and the arachidonic acid cascade through the CB1 receptor using a behavioral paradigm. Therefore, in this study, we clarified the mechanism of cannabinoid-induced suppression of lever pressing in rats, focusing on the arachidonic acid cascade as a novel second messenger of CB1 receptor. Delta(8)-THC and the potent synthetic CB1 receptor agonist HU-210 dose-dependently inhibited lever-pressing performance. The Delta(8)-THC-induced suppression was significantly antagonized by the cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors diclofenac (32 mg/kg, i.p.), aspirin (10 mg/kg, i.p.) and indomethacin (10 mg/kg, i.p.). The suppressive effect of HU-210 was also significantly antagonized by 32 mg/kg diclofenac. Prostaglandin E(2) (3.2 microg/rat, i.c.v.), the final product of the arachidonic acid cascade, significantly inhibited lever pressing similar to Delta(8)-THC and HU-210. In conclusion, we found that suppression of lever-pressing behavior induced by cannabinoids was mediated through activation of the arachidonic acid cascade via the CB1 receptor. Therefore, it is possible that the psychoactive effects of cannabinoid are due to an increase in the formation of PGE(2) in the brain.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Cannabinoid-induced Fos expression within A10 dopaminergic neurons.

Mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic systems subserve cognitive processes, motivated behavior, the central stress response, and the reinforcing properties of drugs of abuse. Hyperdopaminergic states have been suggested to contribute to the psychotropic effects of the cannabinoids; however, the mechanisms by which cannabinoids activate mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic systems are not well understood. We have examined the role of noradrenergic neurotransmission in the mediation of cannabinoid-induced activation of A10 dopaminergic neurons using Fos as a marker of neuronal activation in mice. Administration of the CB(1) receptor agonist CP55940 differentially increased the number of Fos-like immunoreactive (Fos-li) A10 dopaminergic cells within three anatomically distinct regions (parabrachial pigmented, paranigral, and caudal linear nuclei) compared to vehicle-treated mice. Similar results were obtained using the CB(1) receptor agonist Win 55212-2; and pretreatment with the CB(1) receptor antagonist SR141716 significantly inhibited CP55940-induced Fos expression. Pretreatment with the alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor antagonist, prazosin, and the alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor agonist, clonidine, reduced the number of Fos-li dopaminergic neurons induced by CP55940 in a subregion-specific manner. CP55940 and Win 55212-2 increased the number of Fos-li neurons within the locus coeruleus. Finally, CB(1) receptor immunoreactivity was detected on fibers within the CL but not in either PBP or PN. Our data demonstrate that cannabinoids induce Fos expression within A10 dopaminergic neurons in a heterogeneous anatomical pattern, and suggest that enhanced noradrenergic neurotransmission contributes to cannabinoid-induced activation of A10 dopaminergic neurons in vivo.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗
PubMed2000

Role of the superior colliculus in the motor effects of cannabinoids and dopamine.

We studied the cellular distribution of CB1 cannabinoid receptors in the superior colliculus of the rat using an antibody raised against the N-terminal of the receptor. The effect of unilateral cannabinoid receptor stimulation in the intermediate layers of the superior colliculus on rotational behavior in rats was also explored. The antibody against CB1 receptors outlined the crossed descending system of the superior colliculus (predorsal bundle output system) as well as the collicular commisure. The potent cannabinoid agonist CP55,940 (5 microgram/0.25 microliter) induced strong contralateral turning when microinjected unilaterally into the lateral intermediate layers of the superior colliculus. The levels of turning obtained with the intracollicular administration of the cannabinoid were comparable to the highest levels obtained with dopamine agonists in the basal ganglia. The D(2) dopamine agonist quinpirole or the D(1) dopamine agonist SKF82958 reversed this contralateral rotation but failed to affect motor behavior on their own. A new motor pathway for cannabinoids is discussed.

Analgesics↗
PubMed2000

2-Arachidonoylglycerol and the cannabinoid receptors.

2-Arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) is a unique molecular species of monoacylglycerol isolated from rat brain and canine gut as an endogenous cannabinoid receptor ligand (Sugiura, T., Kondo, S., Sukagawa, A., Nakane, S., Shinoda, A., Itoh, K., Yamashita, A., Waku, K., 1995. 2-Arachidonoylglycerol: a possible endogenous cannabinoid receptor ligand in brain. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 215, 89-97; Mechoulam, R., Ben-Shabat, S., Hanus, L., Ligumsky, M., Kaminski, N. E., Schatz, A.R., Gopher, A., Almog, S., Martin, B.R., Compton, D.R., Pertwee, R.G., Giffin, G., Bayewitch, M., Brag, J., Vogel, Z., 1995. Identification of an endogenous 2-monoglyceride, present in canine gut, that binds to cannabinoid receptors. Biochem. Pharmacol. 50, 83-90). 2-AG binds to the cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2) and exhibits a variety of cannabimimetic activities in vitro and in vivo. Recently, we found that 2-AG induces Ca(2+) transients in NG108-15 cells, which express the CB1 receptor, and in HL-60 cells, which express the CB2 receptor, through a cannabinoid receptor- and Gi/Go-dependent mechanism. Based on the results of structure-activity relationship experiments, we concluded that 2-AG but not anandamide is the natural ligand for both the CB1 and the CB2 receptors and both receptors are primarily 2-AG receptors. Evidences are gradually accumulating that 2-AG is a physiologically essential molecule, although further detailed studies appear to be necessary to determine relative importance of 2-AG and anandamide in various animal tissues. In this review, we described mainly our previous and current experimental results, as well as those of others, concerning the tissue levels, bioactions and metabolism of 2-AG.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

CB(1) cannabinoid receptor-G protein association: a possible mechanism for differential signaling.

Effects of cannabinoid compounds on neurons are predominantly mediated by the CB(1) cannabinoid receptor. Onset of signaling cascades in response to cannabimimetic drugs is triggered by the interaction of the cannabinoid receptor with G(i/o) proteins. Much work has been done to delineate the cannabinoid agonist-induced downstream signaling events; however, it remains to define the molecular basis of cannabinoid receptor-G protein interactions that stimulate these signaling pathways. In this review, we discuss several signal transduction pathways, focusing on studies that demonstrate the efficacy of CB(1) receptor agonists through G protein mediated pathways.

Adenylyl Cyclases↗
PubMed2000

Inhibition of nitric oxide production in RAW264.7 macrophages by cannabinoids and palmitoylethanolamide.

We have investigated the inhibition of lipopolysaccharide stimulated nitric oxide production in RAW264.7 macrophages by the cannabinoids and the putative cannabinoid CB(2)-like receptor ligand, palmitoylethanolamide. (R)-(+)-[2, 3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl)pyrrolo-[1,2,3-de]-1, 4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-1-naphthalenylmethanone mesylate ((+)-WIN55212) and, to a lesser extent (-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1, 1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydroxy-propyl)cyclohexan++ +-1-ol (CP55940), significantly inhibited lipopolysaccharide stimulated nitric oxide production. The level of inhibition was found to be dependent on the concentration of lipopolysaccharide used to induce nitric oxide production. Palmitoylethanolamide significantly inhibited nitric oxide production induced by lipopolysaccharide. The inhibition of nitric oxide production by (+)-WIN55212 but not palmitoylethanolamide was significantly attenuated in the presence of the cannabinoid CB(2) receptor antagonist, N-[(1S)-endo-1,3, 3-trimethyl bicyclo [2.2.1] heptan-2-yl]-5-(4-chloro-3-methylphenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)-pyrazo le- 3-carboxamide (SR144528). (+)-WIN55212 produced a pertussis toxin-sensitive parallel rightward shift in the log concentration-response curve for lipopolysaccharide, causing a fivefold increase in the EC(50) value for lipopolysaccharide with no change in the E(max) value. (-)-WIN55212 had no effect on the log concentration-response curve for lipopolysaccharide. Palmitoylethanolamide did not produce a rightward shift in the lipopolysaccharide concentration-response curve. However, it did produce a pertussis toxin-insensitive reduction in the E(max) value. The results suggest that the inhibition of lipopolysaccharide mediated nitric oxide release by (+)-WIN55212 in murine macrophages is mediated by cannabinoid CB(2) receptors. In contrast, the inhibition by palmitoylethanolamide does not appear to be mediated by cannabinoid receptors.

Amides↗
PubMed2002

Modulation of the release of endogenous gamma-aminobutyric acid by cannabinoids in the guinea pig ileum.

Interactions between cannabinoid CB(1) and GABA receptors and ligands were investigated in the myenteric plexus-longitudinal muscle of the guinea pig ileum. Electrically evoked contractions of the myenteric plexus-longitudinal muscle were inhibited by the cannabinoid receptor agonist CP55,940 ((-)-cis-3-[2-Hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl) phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydroxypropyl) cyclohexanol), the GABA(B) receptor agonist, baclofen (4-amino-3-(chlorophenyl) butanoic acid), or exogenous GABA. Electrically evoked contractions of the myenteric plexus-longitudinal muscle were also inhibited by the addition of the GABA releasing agent ethylenediamine. CP55,940 (1 nM) or the endogenous cannabinoid anandamide (arachidonyl ethanolamide, 1 microM) reduced the inhibition produced by ethylenediamine, while in contrast, anandamide (10 microM) significantly increased the inhibition produced by ethylenediamine. The results suggest that while there is no interaction between cannabinoid CB(1) and GABA(B) receptors in the myenteric plexus-longitudinal muscle of the guinea pig, cannabinoid CB(1) receptor stimulation reduces the ethylenediamine-evoked GABA release. In addition, anandamide at higher concentrations also potentiates the inhibitory effect of ethylenediamine at least partly by stimulating vanilloid receptors.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Cannabinoid CB(1) receptor blockade enhances the protective effect of melanocortins in hemorrhagic shock in the rat.

Activation of peripheral cannabinoid CB(1) receptors contributes to hemorrhagic hypotension, and endocannabinoids produced by macrophages and platelets may be mediators of this effect. A number of studies have provided evidence that functional links exist in the mechanisms of action of cannabinoids and opioid peptides; and opioids too play an important role in the pathophysiology of hemorrhagic hypotension and shock. On the other hand, melanocortin peptides, which are the main endogenous functional antagonists of opioid peptides, have an antishock effect in animals and humans. Thus, we investigated whether an interaction exists between endocannabinoids and the endogenous opioid/antiopioid system also in a condition of hemorrhagic shock and, particularly, whether the blockade of cannabinoid CB(1) receptors potentiates the antishock effect of melanocortins. Urethane-anesthetized rats were stepwise bled until mean arterial pressure decreased to, and stabilized at, 21-23 mm Hg. In this model of hemorrhagic shock, which caused the death of all control rats within 30 min after vehicle (tween 80, 5% in saline) injection, the intravenous (i.v.) bolus injection of the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist N-piperidino-5-[4-chlorophenyl]-1-[2,4 dichlorophenyl]-4-methyl-3-pyrazolecarboxamide (SR141716A) increased mean arterial pressure, pulse pressure, respiratory rate and survival rate in a dose-related manner (0.1-3 mg/kg), an almost complete recovery of mean arterial pressure, pulse pressure and respiratory rate, and 100% survival at the end of the observation period (2 h), occurring with the dose of 3 mg/kg. The melanocortin ACTH-(1-24) (adrenocorticotropin) also produced in a dose-related manner (0.02-0.16 mg/kg i.v.) a restoration of cardiovascular and respiratory functions, and increased survival rate, an almost complete recovery and 100% survival at the end of the observation period (2 h) occurring with the dose of 0.16 mg/kg. When a subactive dose of SR141716A (0.2 mg/kg; 30% survival) was associated with a subactive dose of ACTH-(1-24) (0.02 mg/kg; 12% survival), a complete reversal of the shock condition was obtained with 100% survival at the end of the 2-h observation period. The present results show that the concurrent inhibition of both endogenous opioid and cannabinoid systems produces a reversal of hemorrhagic shock more effective than that produced by the inhibition of either of them. These data suggest that functional interactions between endocannabinoids and opioid/antiopioid are at work also in the pathophysiology of hemorrhagic shock.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Pre-exposure to the cannabinoid receptor agonist CP 55940 enhances morphine behavioral sensitization and alters morphine self-administration in Lewis rats.

Three experiments examined the influence of pre-exposure to the cannabinoid receptor agonist CP 55940 ((-)-cis-3-(2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl)-trans-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexanol) on the sensitization of morphine-induced locomotor hyperactivity and self-administration in Lewis rats. In Experiment 1, rats received daily injections of vehicle or CP 55940 (0.1 mg/kg for 7 days then 0.2 mg/kg for a further 7 days). Four weeks later, the locomotor response to morphine (10 mg/kg s.c.) was tested once per day over a 3-h period for 14 consecutive days. Rats given morphine showed hypoactivity during the first hour following morphine but hyperactivity during the second and third hours. A progressive increase in hyperactivity to morphine was seen over the 14 days of administration, which was significantly greater in rats pre-treated with CP 55940. In Experiment 2, rats were given morphine (10 mg/kg) once a day for 14 days in combination with either vehicle, CP 55940 (0.1 mg/kg) or the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist SR 141716 (N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride) (3 mg/kg). Both CP 55940 and SR 141716 initially inhibited the hyperactive response to morphine, but these effects gradually wore off and by the end of 14 days, hyperactivity was similar in all morphine-treated groups. When tested 3 weeks later for their response to morphine (10 mg/kg) given alone, rats previously given the morphine/CP 55940 combination, but not the SR 141716/morphine combination, showed a greater locomotor stimulation than those previously exposed to morphine only. In Experiment 3, rats were pre-exposed to CP 55940 or vehicle for 14 days and were subsequently trained to self-administer morphine intravenously (1 mg/kg per lever press) for 14 days. Rats pre-exposed to CP 55940 self-administered a significantly greater number of morphine infusions than vehicle pre-exposed rats. However, both active and inactive ('dummy') lever presses were increased by cannabinoid pre-treatment. Overall, these results suggest that cannabinoid pre-exposure can lead to an exaggeration of morphine-induced hyperactivity and may alter the reinforcing effects of morphine in Lewis rats. The implications for 'gateway' theories of cannabinoid effects in humans are discussed.

Analgesics↗
PubMed1999

Presence and functional regulation of cannabinoid receptors in immune cells.

In the last 30 years studies on drug-abusing humans and animals injected with cannabinoids, as well as in vitro models employing immune cell cultures, have demonstrated that marijuana and cannabinoids are immunomodulators. Both types of cannabinoid receptors, CB1 and CB2, have been found in immune cells, suggesting they are important in mediating the effects of cannabinoids on the immune system. This article reviews the data on the function and distribution of cannabinoid receptors in the immune system and their involvement in the immunomodulatory effect of these substances.

Animals↗