Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “CONTRACEPTIVES”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 649 records · Page 36Linked to original sources

Oral contraception and risk of a cerebral thromboembolic attack: results of a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of cerebral thromboembolism in women using low dose oral contraceptives. DESIGN: A retrospective case-control study. SETTING: All Danish medical, neurological, neurosurgical, and gynaecological departments. SUBJECTS: All 794 women in Denmark aged 15-44 who had suffered a cerebral thromboembolic attack during 1985-9 and 1588 age matched randomly selected controls. RESULTS: Of 692/1584 case/control questionnaires sent out, 590/1396 (85.3%/88.1%) were returned. Among the cases, 15 refused to participate, 69 had a revised or unreliable diagnosis, 40 had had thromboembolic disease previously, 13 were pregnant, and 152 had a disease predisposing to a cerebral thromboembolic attack. Of the 323 cases without a known predisposition, 320 reported use or non-use of oral contraception. Among the 1396 controls, eight refused to participate, were mentally retarded, or lived abroad; 18 returned an uncompleted questionnaire; 17 had had thromboembolic disease previously; 31 were pregnant; and 130 had a disease predisposing to a cerebral thromboembolic attack. Thus 1198 non-predisposed controls were available, among whom 1197 reported use or non-use of oral contraception. Among the 320 cases, 116 (36.3%) were oral contraceptive users at the time of the cerebral thromboembolic attack. By comparison there were 191 users (16.0%) among the 1197 controls, giving a crude odds ratio of 3.0. After multivariate analysis, including confounder control for age, smoking, years of schooling, and trend in use of different types of oral contraceptives during 1985-90, pills containing 50 micrograms oestrogen were associated with an odds ratio for cerebral thromboembolic attack of 2.9 (95% confidence interval 1.6 to 5.4), those containing 30-40 micrograms oestrogen an odds ratio of 1.8 (1.1 to 2.9), those containing progestogen only an odds ratio of 0.9 (0.4 to 2.4). The odds ratio did not change with increasing age or with duration of oral contraceptive use. A 50% increased risk of a cerebral thromboembolic attacks among cigarette smokers (after confounder control) was independent of oral contraception status and age. CONCLUSION: Low dose oral contraceptives are associated with an increased risk of cerebral thromboembolic attack. Combined or sequential pills containing 30-40 micrograms oestrogen are associated with a one third reduced risk compared with preparations containing 50 micrograms oestrogen. Progestogen only pills did not increase the risk of a cerebral thromboembolic attack.

Adolescent↗

Combined oral contraception with desogestrel/ethinyl estradiol: tolerability profile.

Since their introduction nearly 30 years ago, oral contraceptives have been widely researched regarding their contraceptive and noncontraceptive effects. With proper usage, oral contraceptives provide highly effective contraception. In addition, oral contraceptives confer significant noncontraceptive health benefits, including prevention of ovarian and endometrial cancer and reduction in the incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease, endometriosis, benign breast disease, and dysmenorrhea, among others. Today's low-dose oral contraceptives have an improved safety profile when contrasted with their early higher dose counterparts. Yet oral contraceptive use continues to be associated with a variety of minor side effects, which range from menstrual changes such as breakthrough bleeding, spotting, or amenorrhea, to androgenic effects, including weight gain and acne. These androgenic effects are important factors in patient discontinuation of oral contraceptives. Progestins with increased selectivity have the potential to cause fewer androgenic side effects while retaining appropriate progestin suppression of the endometrium and hypophyseal-pituitary-ovarian axis. A combination oral contraceptive (30 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol with 150 micrograms of desogestrel) has been evaluated extensively by European investigators. This literature suggests that a low-dose oral contraceptive formulated with the selective progestin desogestrel offers a favorable profile of reduced androgenic side effects while retaining the cycle control associated with low-dose oral contraceptives currently marketed in the United States.

Acne Vulgaris↗

Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: further results. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer.

The Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer has brought together and reanalysed the worldwide epidemiological evidence on breast cancer risk and use of hormonal contraceptives. Original data from 54 studies, representing about 90% of the information available on the topic, were collected, checked and analysed centrally. The 54 studies were performed in 26 countries and include a total of 53,297 women with breast cancer and 100,239 women without breast cancer. The studies were varied in their design, setting and timing. Most information came from case-control studies with controls chosen from the general population; most women resided in Europe or North America and most cancers were diagnosed during the 1980s. Overall 41% of the women with breast cancer and 40% of the women without breast cancer had used oral contraceptives at some time; the median age at first use was 26 years, the median duration of use was 3 years, the median year of first use was 1968, the median time since first use was 16 years, and the median time since last use was 9 years. The main findings, summarised elsewhere, are that there is a small increase in the risk of having breast cancer diagnosed in current users of combined oral contraceptives and in women who had stopped use in the past 10 years but that there is no evidence of an increase in the risk more than 10 years after stopping use. In addition, the cancers diagnosed in women who had used oral contraceptives tended to be less advanced clinically than the cancers diagnosed in women who had not used them. Despite the large number of possibilities investigated, few factors appeared to modify the main findings either in recent or in past users. For recent users who began use before age 20 the relative risks are higher than for recent users who began at older ages. For women whose use of oral contraceptives ceased more than 10 years before there was some suggestion of a reduction in breast cancer risk in certain subgroups, with a deficit of tumors that had spread beyond the breast, especially among women who had used preparations containing the highest doses of oestrogen and progestogen. These findings are unexpected and need to be confirmed. Although these data represent most of the epidemiological evidence on the topic to date, there is still insufficient information to comment reliably about the effects of specific types of oestrogen or of progestogen. What evidence there is suggests, however, no major differences in the effects for specific types of oestrogen or of progestogen and that the pattern of risk associated with use of hormonal contraceptives containing progestogens alone may be similar to that observed for preparations containing both oestrogens and progestogens. On the basis of these results, there is little difference between women who have and have not used combined oral contraceptives in terms of the estimated cumulative number of breast cancers diagnosed during the period from starting use up to 20 years after stopping. The cancers diagnosed in women who have used oral contraceptives are, however, less advanced clinically than the cancers diagnosed in never users. Further research is needed to establish whether the associations described here are due to earlier diagnosis of breast cancer in women who have used oral contraceptives, to the biological effects of the hormonal contraceptives or to a combination of both. Little information is as yet available about the effects on breast cancer risk of oral contraceptive use that ceased more than 20 years before and as such data accumulate it will be necessary to re-examine the worldwide evidence.

Adult↗

Oral contraceptives, thrombosis and haemostasis.

The use of oral contraceptives is a well-established acquired risk factor for venous thrombosis. In 1995, a number of epidemiological studies were published which suggested that women who use third generation oral contraceptives that contain desogestrel or gestodene as progestagen are exposed to a two- to threefold higher risk for venous thrombosis than women using second generation oral contraceptives which contain levonorgestrel. In this paper, the effects of oral contraceptives on the haemostatic system are discussed. It appears that plasma from oral contraceptive users is resistant to the anticoagulant action of activated protein C (APC). This phenomenon, called acquired APC resistance, is more pronounced in users of desogestrel or gestodene-containing oral contraceptives than in women who use oral contraceptive pills with levonorgestrel. On the basis of these observations, it was proposed that acquired APC resistance may be the mechanistic basis of the increased risk for venous thrombosis during oral contraceptive use and for the further increased thrombotic risk of third generation oral contraceptive users. Furthermore, the results of a recent cross-over study are discussed. This study indicated that a large number of other haemostatic parameters were changed during oral contraceptive use. Some of these changes were more pronounced on desogestrel-containing oral contraceptives. The cross-over study also showed that the increased fibrinolytic activity during OC use is counterbalanced by an enhanced activity of thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI), a protein that participates in the inhibition of fibrinolysis.

Activated Protein C Resistance↗

How contraceptive use patterns differ by pregnancy intention: implications for counseling.

To increase awareness of issues to include in contraceptive counseling-the objectives of this study were to evaluate: 1) how contraceptive use patterns (eg, non-use), level of effectiveness of contraceptive method, and sociodemographic characteristics may be associated with the occurrence of unintended pregnancy; 2) patterns of health care use for women with intended and unintended pregnancy; and 3) the association between contraceptive use patterns and sociodemographic characteristics. In-person interviews were conducted with 279 women enrolled in a Medicaid managed care health plan who had been pregnant in the last 5 years. Self-reported measures of pregnancy intention, contraceptive use, and health care use were collected. The relationships of pregnancy intention with contraceptive use patterns, level of effectiveness of contraceptive method used, and patterns of recent health care use were assessed. Differences in contraceptive use patterns by sociodemographic groups were assessed. Seventy-eight percent of women reported an unintended pregnancy. Non-use of birth control the month before conception was reported by 57% of women with unintended pregnancies and 84% of women with intended pregnancies. Use of birth control of low effectiveness was reported by 20% of women with unintended pregnancies and 8% of women with intended pregnancies. Non-use or use of contraceptive methods of low effectiveness did not differ for women in different sociodemographic groups regardless of pregnancy intention status. A majority of women reported recent health care use. Health care providers should be aware that women who have no intention for pregnancy may not be using an effective contraceptive method NOR have an effective pattern of contraceptive use.

Adolescent↗

Contraceptive counseling in managed care: preventing unintended pregnancy in adults.

This study examines contraceptive counseling received by adult women in their managed care plans and the relationship between counseling and women's contraceptive attitudes and practices. Telephone interviews were conducted with a random sample of 898 women ages 18 to 44 enrolled in a commercial health maintenance organization (HMO) or point-of-service (POS) health plan. Counseling received in the past 2 years was measured on three dimensions: exposure through any communication channel; content of information; and personalization of discussion. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine the determinants of counseling and the relationship between counseling and four outcomes: satisfaction with counseling received, self-efficacy for preventing unintended pregnancy, current use of contraception (if at risk of unintended pregnancy), and intent to contracept in the next year (if at risk). Overall, 60.5% of women were at risk of unintended pregnancy; among those at risk, 69% received any counseling in the past 2 years, compared with 38% among those not at risk. Receiving personalized counseling (as opposed to no counseling or only informational counseling) significantly increases the odds of satisfaction with counseling, current contraceptive use, and intent to contracept. Informational counseling alone (without personalization) significantly increases the odds of contraceptive use. Women ages 40-44 were less likely than younger women to receive counseling and to use contraception if at risk of unintended pregnancy. We conclude that receiving contraceptive counseling in managed care is associated with contraceptive attitudes and practices among adults and that there is substantial room for quality improvement in the provision of contraceptive counseling.

Adult↗

Oral contraceptives and the risk of myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: An association between the use of oral contraceptives and the risk of myocardial infarction has been found in some, but not all, studies. We investigated this association, according to the type of progestagen included in third-generation (i.e., desogestrel or gestodene) and second-generation (i.e., levonorgestrel) oral contraceptives, the dose of estrogen, and the presence or absence of prothrombotic mutations METHODS: In a nationwide, population-based, case-control study, we identified and enrolled 248 women 18 through 49 years of age who had had a first myocardial infarction between 1990 and 1995 and 925 control women who had not had a myocardial infarction and who were matched for age, calendar year of the index event, and area of residence. Subjects supplied information on oral-contraceptive use and major cardiovascular risk factors. An analysis for factor V Leiden and the G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene was conducted in 217 patients and 763 controls RESULTS: The odds ratio for myocardial infarction among women who used any type of combined oral contraceptive, as compared with nonusers, was 2.0 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.5 to 2.8). The adjusted odds ratio was 2.5 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.5 to 4.1) among women who used second-generation oral contraceptives and 1.3 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.7 to 2.5) among those who used third-generation oral contraceptives. Among women who used oral contraceptives, the odds ratio was 2.1 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.5 to 3.0) for those without a prothrombotic mutation and 1.9 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.6 to 5.5) for those with a mutation CONCLUSIONS: The risk of myocardial infarction was increased among women who used second-generation oral contraceptives. The results with respect to the use of third-generation oral contraceptives were inconclusive but suggested that the risk was lower than the risk associated with second-generation oral contraceptives. The risk of myocardial infarction was similar among women who used oral contraceptives whether or not they had a prothrombotic mutation.

Adolescent↗

Awareness and practices of contraception among Pakistani women attending a tertiary care hospital.

Pakistan is one of the most populous nations in the world, with an annual growth rate of 2.8 and high total fertility rate, even among developing nations. The Pakistan Reproductive Health and Family Planning Survey highlighted the wide gap between knowledge (97%) and use of contraceptives (28%) among currently married women. Our actual need is to enhance contraceptive practice in our country. This study was designed to investigate contraceptive knowledge and practice in Pakistani women attending a tertiary care hospital. This questionnaire-based study was conducted at the Gynaecology Unit II of Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Fatima Jinnah Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan. A total of 204 married women of reproductive age were interviewed by a registrar to record their age, occupation, educational status, number of children, knowledge about contraceptive methods, source of the knowledge, attitudes and practices of contraception. About 57% of women were between 26 and 35 years of age, while 52% of men were between 31 and 40 years. Educational status of the majority of females was below matriculation (33%), while 34% males were above matriculation; 88% of females were housewives and less than 1% of men were out of work. Regarding the social status of couples, 64% were living on income less than 5000 rupees /month (about 60 pound sterling). Of the women, 67% were para 2-5; 68% had some sort of awareness regarding contraception. The main source of information was television (26%) and relatives (24%). The majority knew about the pill (68%) and IUCD (55%). Only 47% were using some sort of contraception. The most common method chosen was the barrier method (15%), followed by IUCD (10%) and the pill (10%). The least common methods were sterilisation (2%) and the rhythm method (2%); 85% of the women and 74% of the men in the study group had a positive attitude toward contraception. In order to improve contraceptive use in Pakistan we need to use multiple media sources to educate couples and their parents regarding contraceptive services, strengthen the perceptions that religion not only allows but also recommends family planning and to create awareness among women to have their rights and opinions about the size of family. The concept of differentiation between sons and daughters should be discouraged. In addition government and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) should organise groups to provide counselling and promotion of contraceptive services at the doorstep. We must act as a team to control our growth rate for economic stabilisation of the country and to raise the living standards of our people.

Adult↗

Contraception: from accessibility to efficiency.

BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread use of medical contraception in France, the prevalence of abortion remains stable. A cross-sectional population-based survey was designed to study the characteristics of current contraceptive use in France, the different types of contraceptive failure, and the reasons reported for not using contraception. METHODS: A representative sample of 14 704 French households was randomly selected from the telephone directory. All women who in the last 5 years had had an abortion or whose last pregnancy was unintended were selected (n = 1034), whilst a fraction (n = 1829) of the other women were randomly selected. Altogether, 2863 women answered the questionnaire. RESULTS: Only 2.7% of the women aged 18-44 years who did not wish to conceive and were sexually active did not use any contraception. However, 33% of pregnancies were estimated to be unplanned, of which 50% ended in an abortion. A total of 65% of the reported unplanned pregnancies occurred among women using contraception (21% the pill, 9% IUD, 12% condoms, 23% other method). The main reasons given for these contraceptive failures were the misuse of the methods or the failure of the partner to withdraw. Reasons for not using any contraception go beyond a simple lack of information. CONCLUSIONS: The importance of-and the reasons mentioned for-contraceptive failure show a misadaptation between women's contraceptive needs and the method they use. Improving the training of family planning providers remains a major goal to ensure that women use a contraceptive method that fits their social and sexual lifestyle.

Abortion, Induced↗

Association between sex hormone-binding globulin levels and activated protein C resistance in explaining the risk of thrombosis in users of oral contraceptives containing different progestogens.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies have shown that both the estrogen dose and progestogen type of oral contraceptives contribute to the increased risk of thrombosis in oral contraceptive users. Thrombin generation-based activated protein C (APC) sensitivity is a global test for the net prothrombotic effect of oral contraceptives and predicts the thrombotic risk. Our objective was to test the usefulness of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) as a marker for the thrombotic risk of an oral contraceptive. METHODS: We measured SHBG and APC resistance in 156 healthy users of various types of oral contraceptives. RESULTS: Users of oral contraceptives with a moderately increased risk of thrombosis (gestodene and desogestrel pills) had higher SHBG levels than users of low-risk oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel. Similarly, for higher doses of estrogen in oral contraceptives we found higher SHBG levels. Women using oral contraceptives with the highest thrombotic risk (cyproterone acetate pills) rendered the highest SHBG levels. Users of oral contraceptives containing gestodene, desogestrel or cyproterone acetate were more resistant to APC than users of levonorgestrel pills. SHBG levels were positively associated with the increased APC resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the hypothesis that the effect of an oral contraceptive on SHBG levels might be a marker for the thrombotic risk.

Adolescent↗

Effects of two types of hormonal contraception--oral versus intravaginal--on the sexual life of women and their partners.

BACKGROUND: Data relating to the influence of hormonal contraception on sexual life are conflicting and mostly they refer to oral contraceptives. In this randomized, controlled, prospective study we compared the effect of an intravaginal hormonal contraceptive with the effect of a combined oral contraceptive on sexual function. METHODS: Fifty-one healthy women with a permanent partner and an active sexual life were randomly divided in two groups according to a computer-generated randomization list: 26 women (group A) used an intravaginal contraceptive releasing 120 microg/day of etonogestrel and 15 microg/day of ethinylestradiol (EE) and 25 women (group B) used an oral contraceptive containing 20 microg di EE and 150 microg of desogestrel. Twenty-five women participated in the study as control group (group C). A specific questionnaire was completed by the patients and their partners at the start of the study and after cycles 3 and 6 of contraceptive use. RESULTS: Within 3 months of contraceptive use, women from both groups A and B reported a global improvement in sexual function. A statistically significant increase in sexual fantasy was reported only by patients of group A. Whereas partners of the women in both groups A and B reported an improvement in sexual function after 3 months of contraceptive intake, only patients' partners of group A reported a significant increase in sexual interest, complicity and sexual fantasy. CONCLUSIONS: Both hormonal contraceptives tested were seen to have a positive effect on some aspects of sexual function. The intravaginal contraceptive ring seems to exert a further positive effect on the psychological aspect of both women and their partners, which is evident from an improved complicity and sexual satisfaction.

Administration, Intravaginal↗

A prospective study of pregravid oral contraceptive use in relation to fetal growth.

OBJECTIVE: Because oral contraceptives are so widely used, any health consequences may have substantial public health implications. Whether pregravid oral contraceptives could affect subsequent pregnancies has not been adequately studied. The study objectives were to examine whether pregravid oral contraceptive use affects fetal growth and pregnancy hormone levels. DESIGN: A prospective study of pregnant women followed through pregnancy. SETTING: A major teaching hospital in Boston, USA. POPULATION: Two hundred and sixty Caucasian pregnant women, with a mean age of 31, and a parity of no more than two. Seventy-nine percent of the women were pregravid oral contraceptive users. METHODS: Exposure and covariate data were collected through structured questionnaires. Blood was drawn for hormonal analysis during the 16th and 27th gestational week. Information on pregravid oral contraceptive use included duration and recency of use, and oral contraceptive formulation. Multivariate regression models were used to examine the effect of pregravid oral contraceptive use on birth outcomes and the studied pregnancy hormones. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Birthweight, placental weight, gestational age, pregnancy hormone levels of oestriol and progesterone at 16th and 27th gestational week. RESULTS: Adjusting for confounders, pregravid oral contraceptive use increased birthweight (mean difference =+207.3 g, 95% CI =+77.6 to +337.1) and placental weight (mean difference =+64.9 g, 95% CI =+13.0 to +116.9) compared with never use. Women with prior oral contraceptive use had higher levels of serum progesterone (P= 0.002) and oestriol (P= 0.12) at the 27th gestational week measurement. The effect on birthweight, placental weight and hormones was stronger among those using oral contraceptives in the previous year and those using a high progestin/high oestrogen potency preparation. CONCLUSIONS: Pregravid oral contraceptive use is positively associated with fetal growth, and this effect may be mediated through oestriol and progesterone.

Adolescent↗

Emergency contraception use and non-use in young women: the application of a contextual and dynamic model.

There have been many approaches to understanding contraception use including social cognition models which have been criticised for their individualistic approach and their static nature. The present quantitative study developed and refined a contextual and dynamic model of contraception use that was derived using qualitative research. This model conceptualizes the predictors of contraception use in terms of the meaning and importance of a range of social goals, perceptions of vulnerability, and constraints on or facilitators of contraception use each of which changes over time. The present study operationalized this model in relation to emergency contraception and explored differences between users and non-users and between episodes of use and non-use. In terms of users and non-users, the results showed that the users of emergency contraception showed a more positive view of an emergency contraception user, perceived greater support from their partner for emergency contraception use, rated themselves more at risk of pregnancy, and felt more confident about asking for emergency contraception. In terms of use and non-use, use was related to an increased belief about the risk of pregnancy, increased partner support, increased concern about health care professionals and the side-effects of the drug, and a more positive identity of an emergency contraception. The study has helped to develop and refine the model and has identified some key factors that are specifically relevant to emergency contraception use in a sample of women in education in and around London.

Adult↗

Provision of emergency contraception by nurses: a way forward to increased access.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were to assess the suitability of a service for provision of emergency hormonal contraception by nurses. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was carried out of data obtained from the case records of 500 consecutive women who attended ABACUS (a city center-based family planning clinic in Liverpool, UK) for emergency contraception during the 7th and 9th months of the first year (1994) of the service. Similar data were collected for 100 consecutive women during 1 month of the third year (June 1996). The number of women who received emergency hormonal contraception was noted. In particular, details pertaining to the reasons for referral to the doctor and the trend of referrals were noted. RESULTS: The results indicate that during the first year the nurses independently issued emergency hormonal contraception to 37% of the women. They referred the remaining 63% to the medical staff. One-third of referrals were for ongoing contraception, especially oral contraception. Another third of referrals appeared to be due to 'nurse anxiety', as no medical or other cause was found for these referrals. During the third year, nurses dispensed emergency hormonal contraception to 64% of women. Among the remaining 36% of women who were referred to the doctor, 19% needed hormonal contraception. Referral reflecting 'nurse anxiety' significantly declined (1%) compared to the first year of service. CONCLUSIONS: Ongoing contraception, particularly initiation of oral contraception, was one of the main reasons for referral during the first year. Referral due to 'nurse anxiety' significantly declined with continued experience and may have reflected initial anxiety and the learning curve. With increased experience over the first 2 years, the outcome of this service showed encouraging improvement. The nurses now dispense emergency hormonal contraception to a majority of women.

Adolescent↗

Cardiovascular risk of oral contraceptives. Low, and mainly in women at risk.

(1) The precise cardiovascular risk of oral contraceptives is poorly known because of a lack of reliable clinical studies and the numerous potential biases in epidemiological studies. (2) The absolute risk of coronary events is very low in women under 35 who are non smokers, have no history of coronary heart disease and have normal blood pressure. In women over 35, smoking over 10 cigarettes a day and arterial hypertension substantially increase the risk of coronary heart disease. (3) The absolute risk of stroke is low in young women who are not hypertensive and do not smoke. It is higher in the case of arterial hypertension. (4) The absolute risk of deep vein thrombosis is increased but remains moderate. Obesity, a family history of deep vein thrombosis, and hereditary clotting disorders are risk factors. (5) The cardiovascular risks linked to oral contraception seem to disappear after cessation. (6) The use of oral contraceptives with very low doses of oestrogen (less than 50 mug ethinylestradiol) reduces the associated risk of stroke. The risk of deep vein thrombosis is probably higher with combined contraceptives containing a third-generation progestagen (desogestrel or gestoden). (7) The coronary and cerebrovascular risks of progestagen-only contraceptives are poorly documented. Low-dose progestagen-only oral contraceptives have little effect on clotting factors or on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. There may be a risk of deep vein thrombosis, however, with this type of contraceptive. (8) History, physical examination and simple laboratory tests before prescribing or renewing oral contraceptives are sufficient to detect the main contraindications, i.e. arterial hypertension, a history of coronary or cerebrovascular conditions, deep vein thrombosis, hypercholesterolaemia exceeding 3 g/l, hypertriglyceridaemia exceeding 3 g/l, unusually severe headache on a combined oral contraceptive and prolonged immobilisation. However, a combined oral contraceptive can be considered for some women with cardiovascular risk factors such as moderate hypercholesterolaemia or hypertriglyceridaemia, well-controlled insulin-dependent diabetes, uncomplicated cardiac valve disease, migraine not worsened by a combined oral contraceptive, varicose veins or a family history of deep vein thrombosis. (9) Pharmacists should be aware of these risk factors so that they can advise patients to see a doctor if new health problems arise between visits.

Cerebrovascular Disorders↗

[Classification of oral contraceptives and its practical application to choice of prescriptions].

The authors have tried to classify the oral contraceptives at present in use throughout the world by their respective levels of oestrogenic and progestogenic components, taking into consideration also the relative strength of each product in use. They have based this classification on their personal experience of the several oral contraceptive products and on a profound study of the international literature. In this way it is possible to define a place for each oral contraceptive so that it can be chosen for the best possible use of a particular product for the hormonal background of the person using the contraceptive. It is true that changes have to be made to work out the oral contraceptives used for masses of people, but on the other hand in countries where there is sufficient medical personnel and education so that it is possible to think out and to prescribe for an individual, it seems to us useful that the doctor who is prescribing should try to adjust the oral contraceptive to the hormonal climate of the woman seeking it. This is true not only for the first time a prescription is made but in cases where by the accident of failure to tolerate the product something must be done to correct the troubles that are so often found in the first months after starting to use contraceptive products. This study includes a general picture of all oral contraceptives in which the products have been classified according to the total dose of oestrogens administered and according to the proportions of progesterone to oestrogens which make up the hormonal climate of the product. On the other hand this study also includes a list of the observations to make in order to adapt the oral contraceptive to the side-effects shown after the first prescription. The authors have come to the conclusion that by adapting the choice of a particular oral contraceptive to the woman who is to receive it interruptions in taking the contraceptive because of side-effects should be avoided. So unwanted pregnancies will be avoided and also the termination of these unwanted pregnancies.

Contraceptives, Oral↗

Unplanned pregnancies in Harare, Zimbabwe: what is the contraceptive history and awareness of the mothers?

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to estimate the proportion of unplanned pregnancies among mothers delivering at the referral Harare Hospital and to describe their levels of contraceptive use and awareness in relation to the planning of pregnancy. DESIGN: Systematic sample of mothers who had just delivered identified through maternity delivery, records. The study was analysed as a case-referent study where cases where mothers who had unintended pregnancies and those with intended or planned pregnancies served as referents. SETTING: Postnatal wards of Harare Maternity Hospital. SUBJECTS: 923 mothers following delivery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Socio-demographic characteristics, pregnancy planning, contraceptive history and contraceptive knowledge. RESULTS: Of the 923 deliveries studied, 377 (41%) were unintended (cases), of which 9% were unwanted. Mothers aged 19 years or below (Odds ratio [OR] = 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6 to 3.7) and those aged 35 years or above (OR = 3.2, 95% CI = 1.8 to 5.5) were significantly more likely to report the index pregnancy as having been unintended. Nulliparous (OR = 2.4) and parity five or more (OR = 8.2) mothers were at significantly increased risk of unintended pregnancy. Mothers presenting with unintended pregnancies were also significantly more likely to be single (OR = 7.8), divorced/separated or widowed (OR = 6.0). Contraceptive ever use was 53% and 58% in cases and referents, respectively. The combined oral contraceptive pill was the most commonly known and used method of contraception. Contraceptive failure was reported by 23% of mothers with unplanned pregnancies. Previous use of the progesterone only pill (OR = 2.2), the condom (OR = 2.3) or the IUCD (OR = 6.3) were significantly associated with the likelihood of reporting with unplanned pregnancy. Mothers in both groups were concerned about contraceptive method failure, irregular menstruation and perceived subsequent infertility with contraception. Failure to discuss family planning with the male partner (OR = 2.3) or partner refusing use of contraception (OR = 2.8) constituted risk factors for unplanned pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Results point to the need for wider contraceptive counselling and provisions which encourage and involve the male partner. Programmes for reproductive health services and education should target women in identified high risk circumstances.

Adolescent↗

Mainstreaming contraceptive services in managed care--five states' experiences.

CONTEXT: The ongoing, rapid national transition from a health care financing and delivery system dominated by traditional indemnity insurance to one dominated by managed care has enormous implications for the accessibility of contraceptive services. METHODS: In each of five areas with relatively mature managed care environments (all of Colorado, Massachusetts and Michigan, as well as selected counties in California and Florida), all managed care organizations serving commercial or Medicaid enrollees were asked about their coverage of contraceptive services and the procedures for obtaining that care. In addition, all publicly funded family planning agencies in these areas were queried about their involvement with managed care plans, and representative samples of reproductive-age women at risk of unintended pregnancy and enrolled in managed care plans were asked about their plan's coverage and their experiences in obtaining contraceptive services. RESULTS: Fifteen percent of health maintenance organizations and point-of-service plans did not cover all five of the most commonly used medical contraceptive methods, and another 6% covered none of the methods. Only half the plans informed enrollees--and even fewer informed enrollees insured indirectly as dependents--of whether they covered contraceptive services. One in four women in commercial plans were unsure whether their plan covered oral contraceptives, and two in three did not know if their plan covered the other medical methods. Only one in four commercial plans have brought community-based family planning providers into their networks, and more than half of all publicly funded family planning agencies reported having no contracts with managed care organizations. Finally, nearly one in three women in managed care plans reported difficulties in obtaining contraceptive services, with 13% of enrollees in commercial plans waiting at least four weeks for an appointment for contraceptive care. CONCLUSIONS: To adequately address the contraceptive needs of their employees, employers must ensure that the health insurance plans they purchase provide adequate coverage of contraceptive methods. For their part, managed care organizations and state Medicaid programs should examine their policies and procedures to ensure that services are easily accessible to women needing contraceptive care.

Adolescent↗