Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ARCHIVES”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 649 records · Page 36Linked to original sources

Anatomy of picture archiving and Communications systems: nuts and bolts--image acquisition: getting digital images from imaging modalities.

Digital acquisition of data from the various imaging modalities for input to a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) is discussed. Essential features for successful clinical implementation including Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) compliance, radiology information system (RIS)/hospital information system (HIS) interfacing, and workflow integration are detailed. Image acquisition from the inherently digital cross-sectional modalities are described, as well as digital acquisition of the conventional projection x-ray using computed radiography (CR), direct digital radiography (DDR), and film digitizers.

Diagnostic Imaging↗

Evaluating a picture archiving and communications system workstation.

An efficient environment for picture archiving and communications systems (PACS) in the radiology department and throughout a medical practice requires good hardware, good software, and integration of the information sources that exist in a radiology department and institution. This tutorial will describe some of the considerations in evaluating a PACS workstation, with a view to the hardware requirements, user interface designs, and integration with the information systems.

Computer Systems↗

The philosophy of benchmark testing a standards-based picture archiving and communications system.

The Department of Defense issued its requirements for a Digital Imaging Network-Picture Archiving and Communications System (DIN-PACS) in a Request for Proposals (RFP) to industry in January 1997, with subsequent contracts being awarded in November 1997 to the Agfa Division of Bayer and IBM Global Government Industry. The Government's technical evaluation process consisted of evaluating a written technical proposal as well as conducting a benchmark test of each proposed system at the vendor's test facility. The purpose of benchmark testing was to evaluate the performance of the fully integrated system in a simulated operational environment. The benchmark test procedures and test equipment were developed through a joint effort between the Government, academic institutions, and private consultants. Herein the authors discuss the resources required and the methods used to benchmark test a standards-based PACS.

Benchmarking↗

Quality-of-service improvements from coupling a digital chest unit with integrated speech recognition, information, and picture archiving and communications systems.

Speech recognition reporting for chest examinations was introduced and tightly integrated with a Radiology Information System (RIS) and a Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS). A feature of this integration was the unique one-to-one coupling of the workstation displayed case and the reporting via speech recognition for that and only that particular examination and patient. The utility of the resulting, wholly integrated electronic environment was then compared with that of the previous analog chest unit and dedicated wet processor, with reporting of hard copy examinations by direct dictation to a typist. Improvements in quality of service in comparison to the previous work environment include (1) immediate release of the patient, (2) decreased rate of repeat radiographs, (3) improved image quality, (4) decreased time for the examination to be available for interpretation, (5) automatic hanging of current and previous images, (6) ad-hoc availability of images, (7) capability of the radiologist to immediately review and correct the transcribed report, (8) decreased time for clinicians to view results, and (9) increased capacity of examinations per room.

Humans↗

Design and implementation of a picture archiving and communication system: the second time.

This report describes the authors' experience in the design and implementation of two large scale picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) during the past 10 years. The first system, which is in daily clinical operation was developed at University of California, Los Angeles from 1983 to 1992. The second system, which continues evolving, has been in development at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) since 1992. The report highlights the differences between the two systems and points out the gradual change in the PACS design concept during the past 10 years from a closed architecture to an open hospital-integrated system. Both systems focus on system reliability and data integrity, with 24-hour on-line service and no loss of images. The major difference between the two systems is that the UCSF PACS infrastructure design is a completely open architecture and the system implementation uses more advanced technologies in computer software, digital communication, system interface, and stable industry standards. Such a PACS can withstand future technology changes without rendering the system obsolete, an essential criterion in any PACS design.

Diagnostic Imaging↗

A design for a picture archiving communication system central storage facility.

A Picture Archive and Communication System (PACS) as it is to be used in a Hospital will consist of a number of workstations, data acquisition stations and output stations, connected to a central storage facility. In this paper the architecture of the central storage facility is studied, and an implementation is proposed. Simulation studies have been performed on the proposed implementations, showing their feasibility. The simulation studies show that the central storage facility can store over 500 sets on a daily basis, while simultaneously handling the review and output activity associated with such a production. On the average, each set is assumed to consist of 3 images of 4 Mbyte each. Simulation results are presented for a number of alternative systems. Special attention is given to the implications of prefetching on the protocols to be used in the PACS system. It is shown that prefetching, in particular in combination with a pipelined system, can yield significant performance benefits. We believe that prefetching of images is a prerequisite for good system performance. The implementation assumes that a high-speed communication protocol is used to interconnect the PACS components. The paper will not go into details on the network considerations. The central storage facility is designed using a general purpose System/370 machine, with the peripherals commonly used for such machines. This implies that it can be realized with currently available equipment. Several alternative implementations using interconnected workstation based systems are suggested.

Computer Systems↗

An improved phantom for quality control of laser scanner digitizers in picture archival and communications systems.

Various quality control (QC) procedures may be used to evaluate image quality for picture archival and communications (PACS) systems. A standard PACS QC protocol applied on a regular basis is desirable to ensure optimal diagnostic performance. We describe a QC phantom designed especially to test PACS systems that acquire images by digitizing x-ray films. The phantom is a sheet of x-ray film upon which a digital test pattern is printed. Multiple parameters of image quality are tested, including resolution, contrast, gray scale, geometric distortion, and noise. Individual test patterns are incorporated to detect specific artifacts of laser scanner digitizers. As part of a regular QC protocol, the phantom provides an objective measurement of change in digital image quality over time, as well as an objective means for comparison with other systems.

Lasers↗

Quality assurance of picture archiving communication systems with laser film digitizers.

A comprehensive quality assurance (QA) program should be implemented for all teleradiology and picture archival and communications (PACS) systems. In this report, we summarize our QA experience with a teleradiology system that includes a laser digitizer for x-ray film. A key component required for the evaluation of laser film scanners is an appropriate test pattern; digitizers should be evaluated with enhanced test patterns specifically designed for this purpose. The phantom pattern should measure high-contrast resolution, low-contrast discrimination, gray scale linearity, geometric distortion, and noise. In addition, a uniformly exposed sheet of film (approximately 0.3 optical density) serves as a good phantom for testing screen nonuniformities of viewing station monitors. It is also suggested that clinical images should be included in a QA program. Finally, it is recommended that any discrepancies in the interpretation of teleradiology images should be monitored and investigated.

Lasers↗

Tools to manage the enterprise-wide picture archiving and communications system environment.

The presentation will focus on the implementation and utilization of a central picture archiving and communications system (PACS) network-monitoring tool that allows for enterprise-wide operations management and support of the image distribution network. The MagicWatch (Siemens, Iselin, NJ) PACS/radiology information system (RIS) monitoring station from Siemens has allowed our organization to create a service support structure that has given us proactive control of our environment and has allowed us to meet the service level performance expectations of the users. The Radiology Help Desk has used the MagicWatch PACS monitoring station as an applications support tool that has allowed the group to monitor network activity and individual systems performance at each node. Fast and timely recognition of the effects of single events within the PACS/RIS environment has allowed the group to proactively recognize possible performance issues and resolve problems. The PACS/operations group performs network management control, image storage management, and software distribution management from a single, central point in the enterprise. The MagicWatch station allows for the complete automation of software distribution, installation, and configuration process across all the nodes in the system. The tool has allowed for the standardization of the workstations and provides a central configuration control for the establishment and maintenance of the system standards. This report will describe the PACS management and operation prior to the implementation of the MagicWatch PACS monitoring station and will highlight the operational benefits of a centralized network and system-monitoring tool.

Humans↗

An overview of a picture archiving and communications system procurement.

The implementation and integration of a picture archiving and communications system (PACS) wil be one of the most significant initiatives a healthcare enterprise will undertake. Developing processes that establish the needs of the users, support strategic initiatives, and address risk management is not trivial. The development of a plan that provides the PACS selection committees with a step-by-step roadmap to seek and procure the PACS best suited to their workflow is a valuable tool. This report is a high-level overview of steps to consider when establishing the process to procure PACS.

Humans↗

How many people does it take to operate a picture archiving and communication system?

The most frequently asked question without a correct answer is: "Just how many people does it take to operate a picture archiving and communication system (PACS)?" At Texas Children's Hospital, our consensus is that we do not yet know. As soon as we felt we had adequate staffing to provide timely response for routine services, we found that including the Intensive Care Units (ICUs) increased our demand for urgent response beyond our capacity. The addition of inpatient bedside imaging to PACS also increased the demand for round-the-clock and weekend PACS services. Our answer to the staffing question changes every year, in accordance with changes in the scope of services that our PACS is expected to provide. Our administration drew up a 5-year plan for PACS implementation, concentrating on purchase and installation of equipment, but neglected to estimate requirements for full-time equivalents (FTEs) for PACS. Our administration reasonably assumed that existing employees would be galvanized into PACS personnel. It is now clear that new FTEs need to be created strictly for the PACS service. Our 5-year plan also did not anticipate significant changes in the extent of our healthcare enterprise. Our PACS accommodates limited remote service: providing a PACS Analyst to travel to the site when a problem is not resolved remotely is another demand on staffing. Our PACS service was formed using staffing numbers based on assumptions about the minimum number of employees needed to perform routine duties, field trouble calls, conduct training, and work on special projects, such as adding new acquisition modalities or troubleshooting longstanding problems. This staffing was based on a single shift operation, with on-call coverage for second, third, and weekend shifts. The number of employees also considered absences for vacation, sick leave, and training. The service has administrative overhead that should be covered by a secretary. Someone is also needed to supervise the team. Once the number of personnel is determined, detailed definition of qualifications and responsibilities is required. Each job description must accurately reflect what is expected of the employee, but must be constructed in such a way to be graded appropriately by Human Resources, without excluding potentially desirable applicants. In addition to competitive pay, other factors play an important role in recruiting and retention. These include training that the hospital provides, opportunities for advancement, relief from menial duties, adequate working space and facilities, and opportunities for self-development. There is high turnover of personnel in computer services, and we are in a highly competitive market. The correct number of FTEs must consider that we will have to operate the PACS during periods when one or more positions are open or occupied by "greenhorns." In our case, where the vendor provides on-site service engineers, we are able to operate with fewer FTEs. The more distant and tenuous our vendor support, the more we would need to depend on hospital FTEs. While remote vendor maintenance is helpful, it is not useful in reducing the number of FTEs. Instead of adding PACS responsibilities to supervisors of imaging services, we are creating new PACS FTEs outside the PACS service. The idea is to give imaging supervisors the assets they need to perform the additional tasks involving PACS, such as first-line response to trouble, user training, and quality-control oversight. It also frees up PACS service personnel to deal with training and problems with customers outside the Radiology Department.

Humans↗

Developing policies and procedures for a picture archiving and communication system.

Policies and procedures (P&P) constitute the mechanism for planning, standardizing, and documenting the provision of clinical services. Upon approval by hospital management, the P&P is an official statement of hospital rules and regulations. Each P&P establishes organizational responsibility for providing services. P&P are a mechanism for communicating standard operating procedures to hospital and medical staff. P&P serve as a reference document for unusual events, as well as routine procedures. P&P are often reviewed by inspection teams from the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospital Organizations (JCAHO) to determine whether the hospital has documented systematic practices. A picture archival and communications system (PACS) provides a new vehicle for providing radiology services. P&P that were designed for conventional film-based imaging are often not appropriate for electronic imaging. Because PACS is new and not yet widespread, good examples of PACS P&P are not yet available. JCAHO has no official requirements for PACS: PACS is viewed only as a means for the hospital to accomplish its work. Successful P&P development is a team effort, drafted by personnel responsible for executing the procedure, assisted by staff proficient in PACS technology, and tested in the field. The P&P should be reviewed and approved by management personnel knowledgeable about hospital and imaging operations. P&P should be written in clear and concise language. Successful P&P development is an ongoing effort. P&P must be periodically reviewed and updated to reflect changes in PACS technology and changes in clinical operations. New P&P must be developed when a deficit is noted. PACS security is a good example of a topic worthy of P&P development, especially in the face of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) legislation of 1996. What are the provisions for access control? Does the system include a feature for automatic shut-off of the software? Are there "generic" passwords and log-ins shared by a community of users? How are passwords assigned and how frequently are they changed? What security measures are in place to assure passwords are given to the appropriate user? Who grants and denies access? Service calls are another topic for P&P. Who initiates a service call? What is the process for escalating a service call from the operator level to the vendor? What immediate actions are expected by the operator in order to restore PACS services? How are service events documented? Who is responsible for determining when "downtime" procedures should be initiated or suspended? When our hospital's total electrical system had to be shut down for an extended period, we found that a P&P was lacking for a task as mundane as shutting down and restarting our PACS components. What is the sequence for the shutdown? Who is responsible for shutting down and restarting? How long can the devices operate on uninteruptible power supplies (UPS)? What components are on emergency power? Should we expect the components to survive the switchover to generator power? Developing this P&P was worth the effort: it made the PACS more fault-tolerant and served as a reference document 3 years later when expansion of our physical plant required two more power outages.

Humans↗

Research and teaching access to a large clinical picture archiving and communication system.

PURPOSE: To identify practical issues surrounding delivering digital images from picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) for research and teaching purposes. The complexity of Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) access methods, security, patient confidentiality, PACS database integrity, portability, and scalability are discussed. A software prototype designed to resolve these issues is described. SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE: A six-component, three-tier, client server software application program supporting DICOM query/retrieve services was developed in the JAWA language. This software was interfaced to a large GE (Mt Prospect, IL) Medical Systems clinical PACS at Northwestern Memorial Hospital (NMH). CONCLUSION: Images can be delivered from a clinical PACS for research and teaching purposes. Concerns for security, patient confidentiality, integrity of the PACS database, and management of the transactions can be addressed. The described software is one such solution for achieving this goal.

Computer-Assisted Instruction↗

Automated examination notification of emergency department images in a picture archiving and communication system.

This study compares the timeliness of radiology interpretation of Emergency Department (ED) imaging examinations in a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) before and after implementation of an automated paging system for notification of image availability. An alphanumeric pager for each radiology subspecialty (chest, pediatrics, bone, neuroradiology, and body) was used to alert the responsible radiologist that an ED imaging examination is available to be viewed on the PACS. The paging system was programmed to trigger off of the PACS database when an image is received on the appropriate radiology display station. The pager message includes the radiology accession number and examination description (such as chest, two-view, or c-spine, etc). The PACS paging tool performance was assessed by calculating the time elapsed, for each ED imaging examination, from the Time Imaged to the Time of Interpretation, where the Time Imaged is the actual image completion time measured at the imaging modality, and the Time Interpreted is the time a radiology interpretation is rendered to the ED, and is measured from the Radiology-to-ED fax time stamp. These measures were analyzed pre- and post-paging system implementation to determine any impact of the automated notification tool on radiology service turnaround time. Results show an improved radiology response time from image completion to interpretation rendered to ED clinicians, down from hour(s) to minutes, with the automated paging examination notification system. Examinations are read by the appropriate radiology specialty section in a more timely fashion, and fewer cases go unread by radiology.

Emergency Service, Hospital↗

Picture archiving and communications systems (PACS) in private practice: St. Paul Radiology PACS project.

While much of diagnostic radiology is practiced in a private setting, many of the papers and presentations describing picture archiving and communications systems (PACS) implementation to date have been sponsored by university and government health facilities. We will present a 4-year retrospective review of a private practice PACS project. The challenges, benefits, and cost analysis of the PACS project will be presented.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

Trials and tribulations in deploying digital imaging network and picture archiving and communication system--film to filmless in 80 days.

The Naval Medical Center Portsmouth (NMCP) was constructed with the intention of deploying a picture archiving and communications system (PACS). All necessary infrastructures were installed and considerable planning was done during construction with the belief that this would make the deployment of the PACS much simpler. This was true during the early deployment; however, as time passed and the system was more heavily used, significant problems arose. User/operator-related and hardware/software-related problems were encountered. Although, most have been corrected, some have persisted and will require considerable manpower and/or fiscal resources to correct. The lesson learned is that no matter how much preparation is done for deploying PACS, many significant problems will surface as the system is used that will require the continued attention of the deployment project officer.

Computer Systems↗

The National Institutes of Health Clinical Center Digital Imaging Network, Picture Archival and Communication System, and Radiology Information System.

In this work, we describe the digital imaging network (DIN), picture archival and communication system (PACS), and radiology information system (RIS) currently being implemented at the Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health (NIH). These systems are presently in clinical operation. The DIN is a redundant meshed network designed to address gigabit density and expected high bandwidth requirements for image transfer and server aggregation. The PACS projected workload is 5.0 TB of new imaging data per year. Its architecture consists of a central, high-throughput Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) data repository and distributed redundant array of inexpensive disks (RAID) servers employing fiber-channel technology for immediate delivery of imaging data. On demand distribution of images and reports to clinicians and researchers is accomplished via a clustered web server. The RIS follows a client-server model and provides tools to order exams, schedule resources, retrieve and review results, and generate management reports. The RIS-hospital information system (HIS) interfaces include admissions, discharges, and transfers (ATDs)/demographics, orders, appointment notifications, doctors update, and results.

Hospital Information Systems↗