Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “VIRAL INTERFERENCE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 631 records · Page 35Linked to original sources

Inhibition of Marburg virus protein expression and viral release by RNA interference.

High mortality rates and lack of an available vaccine against Marburg haemorrhagic fever (MHF) highlight the need for a defensive therapy against MHF and greater knowledge of the causative agent, the Marburg virus (MARV). Here, RNA interference (RNAi) is employed to destroy MARV transcripts, disrupting replication and allowing analysis of various roles of MARV proteins. Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) homologous to three MARV transcripts (NP, VP35 and VP30) were co-transfected into cells with plasmids encoding the corresponding nucleocapsid proteins. The resulting decrease in MARV nucleocapsid-protein levels was shown to be specific, as siRNA that was not homologous to the MARV genome did not decrease the levels of viral nucleocapsid proteins. Additionally, transcript levels of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-sensor proteins, the dsRNA-activated protein kinase and 2',5'-oligoadenylate synthetase 1 remained unchanged, suggesting that the decrease in viral proteins was not a result of activation of the antiviral properties of the interferon system. Subsequently, siRNAs were shown to reduce intracellular viral proteins in MARV-infected cells and viral material released into the medium. Targeted reduction of VP30 downregulated the intracellular levels of all other viral proteins, suggesting that VP30 plays an essential role for transcription/replication. The efficient reduction of MARV replication also suggests that RNAi may provide an agent against MHF.

Animals↗

The 5'-terminal sequence of VSV(NJ) (Ogden): is the interaction of the NS protein with the NS binding site responsible for heterotypic interference activity?

The 5'-terminal sequence of VSV(NJ) (Ogden) and VSV(NJ) (Hazelhurst) was compared in an attempt to understand why the defective interfering particle, DI-LT, heterotypically interferes with VSV(NJ) (Ogden) but not with VSV(NJ) (Hazelhurst). The 5'-terminal sequence of VSV(NJ) (Ogden) genomic RNA was determined by direct RNA sequencing and by DNA sequencing of cDNA clones of the 3'-terminal sequence of VSV(NJ) (Ogden) DI particle genome. Primer extension analysis of the 5'-terminus of VSV(NJ) (Ogden) standard genomic RNA confirmed these data. Within the last 47 nucleotides, equivalent to the negative-strand leader RNA, the only nucleotide changes between VSV(NJ) (Ogden) and VSV(NJ) (Hazelhurst) occur between nucleotides 19 and 26, representing part of the putative NS binding region described by Isaac and Keene (J. Virol. 43, 241-249 (1982] for VSV(IND) DI particles. The spacer (S) region, located between the polyadenylation signal of the L gene and the 47th nucleotide of the leader RNA, contains more differences. The polyadenylation signal of the L gene is fully conserved, but the remainder of the L gene region (177 nucleotides) has highly diverged between VSV(NJ) (Ogden) and VSV(NJ) (Hazelhurst). The changes in the NS binding region of the negative-strand leader RNA provide further evidence for the divergent evolution of VSV(NJ) (Ogden) and VSV(NJ) (Hazelhurst). The NS binding region has been implicated as a crucial site for the initiation of RNA transcription and replication. The interaction of the NS protein with this site may determine the ability of DI particles to interfere heterotypically.

Base Sequence↗

System of double infection between vaccinia virus and mengovirus.

When L cells are simultaneously infected with vaccinia virus and mengovirus, double interference in the replication of both viruses is observed. Superinfection of vaccinia virus-infected cells by mengovirus during the first 5 hr of infection reduces vaccinia virus yields to between 1 and 3% of controls. The yields of mengovirus are reduced to between 1 and 16% of controls, depending upon the time of superinfection. The replication of vaccinia deoxyribonucleic acid is not inhibited by mengovirus; it is only delayed. On the other hand, vaccinia multiplication severely hinders the replication of mengovirus ribonucleic acid. The double-infected system, at early times, synthesizes proteins that resemble those synthesized in the vaccinia virus-infected cells. Later in infection, however, the pattern is switched to proteins synthesized by mengovirus-infected cells. Possible mechanisms for this double interference in multiplication are discussed.

Animals↗

Characterization of Marburg virus glycoprotein in viral entry.

One major determinant of host tropism for filoviruses is viral glycoprotein (GP), which is involved in receptor binding and viral entry. Compared to Ebola GP (EGP), Marburg GP (MGP) is less well characterized in viral entry. In this study, using a human immunodeficiency virus-based pseudotyped virus as a surrogate system, we have characterized the role of MGP in viral entry. We have shown that like EGP, the mucin-like region of MGP (289-501) is not essential for virus entry. We have developed a viral entry interference assay for filoviruses, and using this assay, we have demonstrated that transfection of EGP or MGP in target cells can interfere with EGP/HIV and MGP/HIV pseudotyped virus entry in a dose-dependent manner. These results are consistent with the notion that Ebola and Marburg viruses use the same or a related host molecule(s) for viral entry. Substitutions of the non-conserved residues in MGP1 did not impair MGP-mediated viral entry. Unlike that of EGP1, individual substitutions of many conserved residues of MGP1 exerted severe defects in MGP expression, incorporation to HIV virions, and thus its ability to mediate viral entry. These results indicate that MGP is more sensitive to substitutions of the conserved residues, suggesting that MGP may fold differently from EGP.

Amino Acid Sequence↗