Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Promegestone”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 631 records · Page 35Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

An androgen response element in a far upstream enhancer region is essential for high, androgen-regulated activity of the prostate-specific antigen promoter.

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is expressed at a high level in the luminal epithelial cells of the prostate and is absent or expressed at very low levels in other tissues. PSA expression can be regulated by androgens. Previously, two functional androgen-response elements were identified in the proximal promoter of the PSA gene. To detect additional, more distal control elements, DNasel-hypersensitive sites (DHSs) upstream of the PSA gene were mapped in chromatin from the prostate-derived cell line LNCaP grown in the presence and absence of the synthetic androgen R1881. In a region 4.8 to 3.8 kb upstream of the transcription start site of the PSA gene, a cluster of three DHSs was detected. The middle DNAseI-hypersensitive site (DHSII, at approximately -4.2 kb) showed strong androgen responsiveness in LNCaP cells and was absent in chromatin from HeLa cells. Further analysis of the region encompassing DHSII provided evidence for the presence of a complex, androgen-responsive and cell-specific enhancer. In transient transfected LNCaP cells, PSA promoter constructs containing this upstream enhancer region showed approximately 3000-fold higher activity in the presence than in the absence of R1881. The core region of the enhancer could be mapped within a 440-bp fragment. The enhancer showed synergistic cooperation with the proximal PSA promoter and was found to be composed of at least three separate regulatory regions. In the center, a functionally active, high-affinity androgen receptor binding site (GGAACATATTGTATC) could be identified. Mutation of this element almost completely abolished PSA promoter activity. Transfection experiments in prostate and nonprostate cell lines showed largely LNCaP cell specificity of the upstream enhancer region, although some activity was found in the T47D mammary tumor cell line.

Androgens↗
PubMed1998

Agonist and antagonists induce homodimerization and mixed ligand heterodimerization of human progesterone receptors in vivo by a mammalian two-hybrid assay.

This study utilizes the mammalian two-hybrid system to examine the role of ligand in the dimerization of human progesterone receptor (hPR). The GAL4 DNA-binding domain and the herpes simplex virus VP16 transactivation domain were fused to the amino terminus of full-length hPR (both the A and B isoforms) to produce chimeric proteins. PR dimerization was detected by the ability of cotransfected GAL4/PR and VP16/PR chimeras in COS cells to induce expression of a reporter gene under the control of GAL4-binding sites (pG5CAT). Hormone agonist-dependent interactions were observed between the two like isoforms of PR (A-A and B-B) and between PR-A and PR-B (A-B), indicating that hormone can stimulate the formation of the three possible dimeric forms of PR within cells. In contrast, neither type I (ZK98299) nor type II (RU486, ZK112993) progestin antagonists stimulated interaction between these same hybrid PR proteins. However, activation of the VP16/PR chimera by antagonists on a progesterone response element-controlled reporter gene (DHRE-E1b-CAT) was only a fraction (4-13%) of that stimulated by agonist R5020. One possibility for the failure to detect an induction in the two-hybrid assay is antagonist-induced repression of the activity of the VP16/PR fusion protein rather than a failure of antagonists to stimulate interaction between the hybrid proteins. To test this idea, an UP-1 carboxyl-terminal truncation mutant of PR was used to construct the two-hybrid proteins. PR-UP-1 selectively binds antagonists, but not agonists, and is fully activated in response to antagonists. Both types of progestin antagonists stimulated interactions between GAL4/PR(UP-1) and VP16/PR(UP-1) hybrid proteins, indicating that antagonists are capable of stimulating PR dimerization in cells and do not function by disrupting or preventing dimerization. To determine whether PR bound to an antagonist can dimerize in whole cells with PR bound to agonist, GAL4/PR(UP-1) was paired in the two-hybrid assay with a VP16/PR fusion protein harboring a point mutation in PR at amino acid 722 (Gly-Cys) that specifically binds progestin agonist but not antagonist. Neither R5020 nor RU486 alone stimulated interaction between these ligand-specific PR hybrid proteins. However, strong interaction was detected by addition of both agonist and antagonists, indicating the formation of mixed ligand heterodimers and that both PR partners require ligand for dimerization to occur. Based on electrophoretic gel mobility shift assays (EMSAs), these heterodimers appear to have substantially reduced DNA binding activity. Progestin antagonists inhibit agonist activation of PR at concentrations that are too low to be accounted for by a simple competition mechanism for binding to PR. We propose that antiprogestin inactivation of PR in trans by heterodimerization contributes to the biological potency of these compounds.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Synergistic enhancement of PRB-mediated RU486 and R5020 agonist activities through cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate represents a delayed primary response.

Activators of protein kinase A have been shown to affect the transactivation potential of progestins and antiprogestins. To analyze the mechanisms and factors involved, we have created HeLa and CV1 cell clones stably expressing isoform B of progesterone receptor. In the HeLa cell background, the progesterone antagonist RU486 significantly induces progesterone-regulatable reporter genes, and this agonistic effect is synergistically enhanced by elevating cAMP or through overexpression of protein kinase A catalytic subunit. In contrast, in CV1 cells containing functional progesterone receptors no agonist activity of RU486 could be detected, suggesting the involvement of cell specifically expressed factors. In a PR(B)-positive HeLa cell clone containing stably integrated copies of a thymidine kinase-luciferase reporter gene with two progesterone response elements, we observed a complete loss of RU486 antagonist potential upon cotreatment with cAMP for 25 h while partial antagonist potential was maintained in a 5-h experiment. This result shows that, particularly in the presence of protein kinase A activators, the duration of hormone treatment is a crucial parameter in the evaluation of antagonist properties of antiprogestins. A detailed analysis of the kinetics of the hormone effects on transcription revealed that the onset of cAMP/RU486 synergism is delayed relative to the responses induced by RU486 or R5020 alone. Moreover, partial inhibition of protein synthesis by cycloheximide completely abolished cAMP/RU486 synergism while R5020 and RU486 responses were not inhibited. Together, these data indicate that cAMP/RU486 synergism is a delayed primary response requiring the intermediate induction of an essential factor.

Chromosomes↗
PubMed1998

Extreme position dependence of a canonical hormone response element.

Hormone response elements (HREs) are considered enhancers, activating transcription in a relatively position- and orientation-independent fashion. Upon binding to an HRE, steroid receptors presumably contact coactivators and/or proteins associated with the transcription initiation complex. As a receptor target site is moved further from a fixed position such as the TATA box, not only will the spatial separation of the receptor with respect to its interaction partners change, so will the orientation due to the rotation of the DNA helix. Additional constraints may be imposed by the assembly of DNA into chromatin. Therefore, we have endeavored to test rigorously the assertion that HRE action is position independent. We have constructed a series of 42 chloramphenicol acetyltransferase expression vectors that contain a single progesterone/glucocorticoid receptor-binding site separated from a TATA box by 4 to 286 bp. The enhancer activity of the HRE was assessed after transient transfection of progesterone receptor-expressing fibroblasts. We find that the position of the HRE has a dramatic influence on induction by progestins. When closely juxtaposed to the TATA box, the HRE was unable to support a hormone response, perhaps due to direct steric hindrance with the transcription initiation complex. Full activity was gained by moving the HRE 10 bp further from the TATA sequence. As the HRE was moved incrementally further, activity remained near maximal over the next 26 bp. HRE activity then declined over the subsequent 26 bp and remained low for another 2.5 helical turns. Surprisingly, a narrow window of HRE activity occurred at an HRE-TATA box separation of 90-100 bp. Little or no hormone-induced transcriptional activity was observed when the HRE was positioned further from the TATA box. The addition of a second HRE or a basal (nuclear factor-1) element failed to relieve this constraint. A similar series of experiments was carried out in a mammary carcinoma cell line that expressed high levels of both glucocorticoid and progestin receptors. Data in these cells indicate that glucocorticoids and progestins supported a similar HRE position-activity profile, but this pattern of HRE activity was quite distinct from that seen in fibroblasts. This may be indicative of cell type-specific interactions between steroid receptors and adapter/coactivator proteins or cell type-specific activities such as acetylases or deacetylases participating in the steroid response.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1998

Calcium/calmodulin kinase inhibitors and immunosuppressant macrolides rapamycin and FK506 inhibit progestin- and glucocorticosteroid receptor-mediated transcription in human breast cancer T47D cells.

The effects of immunosuppressants and inhibitors of specific calcium/calmodulin kinase (CaMK) of types II and IV on progestin/glucocorticosteroid-induced transcription were studied in two human stably transfected breast cancer T47D cell lines. The lines contain the chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) gene under control either of the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter (T47D-MMTV-CAT), or the minimal promoter containing five glucocorticosteroid/progestin hormone response elements [T47D-(GRE)5-CAT]. Progestin- and triamcinolone acetonide (TA)-induced CAT gene expression was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner in both lines by preincubation with rapamycin (Rap) and, to a lesser extent, with FK506, but not with cyclosporin A. CaMK II and/or IV inhibitors KN62 and KN93 also inhibited progestin- and TA-stimulated transcription in both lines. None of these drugs had any effect on basal transcription. The antagonist RU486 inhibited all the effects of both progestin and TA, suggesting that progesterone receptor (PR)-, as well as glucocorticosteroid receptor (GR)- mediated transactivation are targets of immunosuppressants and CaMKs in T47D cells. Indeed, Northern analysis showed that Rap, KN62, and, to a lesser degree, FK506 inhibited progestin stimulation of Cyclin D1 mRNA levels, but not those of the non-steroid-regulated glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene. Addition of Rap or KN62 after exposure of cells to progesterone agonist Org 2058 had no effect on induction of CAT activity. Taken together, these data indicate that Rap and FK506, as well as CaMK inhibitors, inhibit steroid-induced activities of exogenous, as well as of some endogenous, steroid receptor-regulated genes by a mechanism preceding hormone-induced receptor activation. Rap appeared to stabilize a 9S form of [3H]Org 2058-PR complexes isolated from T47D (GRE)5CAT cell nuclei. By contrast, the progesterone receptor (PR) was isolated from cells treated with KN62 as a 5S entity, undistinguishable from the 5S PR species extracted from cells treated with progestin only. The nuclear 9S-[3H]Org2058-PR resulting from cells exposed to Rap, contained, in addition to the heat shock proteins of 90 kDa and 70 kDa (hsp90 and hsp70), the FK506-binding immunophilin FKBP52 but not FKBP51, although the latter was part of unliganded PR heterocomplex associated with hsp90. These results suggest that Rap and KN62 act upon the PR by distinct mechanisms, with only Rap impeding progestin-induced PR transformation. FKBP51 appeared to dissociate from the receptor heterocomplex, but not from hsp90, after hormone binding to PR in vitro and in vivo, whether in the presence or not of Rap and KN62. Immunoprecipitation experiments distinguished two PR- and glucocorticosteroid (GR)-associated molecular chaperone complexes, containing hsp90 and hsp70 and FKBP52 or FKBP51. Another complex identified in T47D cytosol contained hsp90 and the cyclosporin A-binding cyclophilin of 40 kDa, CYP40, but not hsp70, PR, or GR. These observations support the concept that FKBP51 and FKBP52 can act as regulators of Rap and FK506 activity upon PR and GR-mediated transcription, a mechanism that could be also regulated by type II and/or type IV CaMKs.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Differential localization and activity of the A- and B-forms of the human progesterone receptor using green fluorescent protein chimeras.

Subcellular localization and transcriptional activity of green fluorescent protein-progesterone receptor A and B chimeras (GFP-PRA and GFP-PRB) were examined in living mammalian cells. Both GFP-PRA and B chimeras were found to be similar in transcriptional activity compared with their non-GFP counterparts. GFP-PRA and PRA were both weakly active, while GFP-PRB and PRB gave a 20- to 40-fold induction using a reporter gene containing the full-length mouse mammary tumor virus long-terminal repeat linked to the luciferase gene (pLTRluc). Using fluorescence microscopy, nuclear/cytoplasmic distributions for the unliganded and hormone activated forms of GFP-PRA and GFP-PRB were characterized. The two forms of the receptor were found to have distinct intracellular distributions; GFP-PRA was found to be more nuclear than GFP-PRB in four cell lines examined. The causes for and implications of this differential localization of the A and B forms of the human PR are discussed.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Hormone-dependent interaction between the amino- and carboxyl-terminal domains of progesterone receptor in vitro and in vivo.

Full transcriptional activation by steroid hormone receptors requires functional synergy between two transcriptional activation domains (AF) located in the amino (AF-1) and carboxyl (AF-2) terminal regions. One possible mechanism for achieving this functional synergy is a physical intramolecular association between amino (N-) and carboxyl (C-) domains of the receptor. Human progesterone receptor (PR) is expressed in two forms that have distinct functional activities: full-length PR-B and the amino-terminally truncated PR-A. PR-B is generally a stronger activator than PR-A, whereas under certain conditions PR-A can act as a repressor in trans of other steroid receptors. We have analyzed whether separately expressed N- (PR-A and PR-B) and C-domains [hinge plus ligand-binding domain (hLBD)] of PR can functionally interact within cells by mammalian two-hybrid assay and whether this involves direct protein contact as determined in vitro with purified expressed domains of PR. A hormone agonist-dependent interaction between N-domains and the hLBD was observed functionally by mammalian two-hybrid assay and by direct protein-protein interaction assay in vitro. With both experimental approaches, N-C domain interactions were not induced by the progestin antagonist RU486. However, in the presence of the progestin agonist R5020, the N-domain of PR-B interacted more efficiently with the hLBD than the N-domain of PR-A. Coexpression of steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) and the CREB binding protein (CBP), enhanced functional interaction between N- and C-domains by mammalian two-hybrid assay. However, addition of SRC-1 and CBP in vitro had no influence on direct interaction between purified N- and C-domains. These results suggest that the interaction between N- and C-domains of PR is direct and requires a hormone agonist-induced conformational change in the LBD that is not allowed by antagonists. Additionally, coactivators are not required for physical association between the N- and C-domains but are capable of enhancing a functionally productive interaction. In addition, the more efficient interaction of the hLBD with the N-domain of PR-B, compared with that of PR-A, suggests that distinct interactions between N- and C-terminal regions contribute to functional differences between PR-A and PR-B.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Differential hormone-dependent phosphorylation of progesterone receptor A and B forms revealed by a phosphoserine site-specific monoclonal antibody.

Human progesterone receptor (PR) is phosphorylated on multiple serine residues (at least seven sites) in a manner that involves distinct groups of sites coordinately regulated by hormone and different kinases. Progress on defining a functional role for PR phosphorylation has been hampered both by the complexity of phosphorylation and the lack of simple, nonradioactive methods to detect the influence of ligands and other signaling pathways on specific PR phosphorylation sites in vivo. Toward this end, we have produced monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) that recognize specific phosphorylation sites within human PR including a basal site at Ser 190 (MAb P190) and a hormone-induced site at Ser 294 (MAb P294). Biochemical experiments showed the differential reactivity of the P190 and P294 MAbs for phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms of PR. Both MAbs recognize specific phosphorylated forms of PR under different experimental conditions including denatured PR protein by Western blots and PR in its native conformation in solution or complexed to specific target DNA. As detected by Western blot of T47D cells treated with hormone for different times, hormone-dependent down-regulation of total PR and the Ser 190 phosphorylation site occurred in parallel, whereas the Ser 294 phosphorylation site was down-regulated more rapidly. This difference in kinetics suggests that the Ser 294 site is more labile than basal sites and is acted upon by distinct phosphatases. A strong preferential hormone-dependent phosphorylation of Ser 294 was observed on PR-B as compared with the amino-terminal truncated A form of PR. This was unexpected because Ser 294 and flanking sequences are identical on both proteins, suggesting that a distinct conformation of the N-terminal domain of PR-A inhibits phosphorylation of this site. That Ser 294 lies within an inhibitory domain that mediates the unique repressive functions of PR-A raises the possibility that differential phosphorylation of Ser 294 is involved in the distinct functional properties of PR-A and PR-B.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2000

Characterization of transiently and constitutively expressed progesterone receptors: evidence for two functional states.

Activated steroid receptors induce chromatin remodeling events in the promoters of some target genes. We previously reported that transiently expressed progesterone receptor (PR) cannot activate mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter when it adopts the form of ordered chromatin. However, when expressed continuously, the PR acquires this ability. In this study we explored whether this gain of function occurs through alterations in nucleoprotein structure at the MMTV promoter or through changes in receptor status. We observed no major structural differences at the MMTV promoter in the presence of constitutively expressed PR and found its mechanism of activation to be very similar to that of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). However, a systematic comparison of the functional behavior of the transiently and constitutively expressed PR elucidated significant differences. The transiently expressed PR is activated in the absence of ligand by cAMP and by components in FBS and has significantly increased sensitivity to progestins. In contrast, the constitutively expressed PR is refractory to activation by cAMP and serum and has normal sensitivity to its ligand. In addition, while the PR is localized to the nucleus in both cases, a significant fraction of the transiently expressed PR is tightly bound to the nucleus even in the absence of ligand, while the majority of constitutively expressed PR is not. These results strongly suggest that the PR undergoes processing in the cell subsequent to its initial expression and that this processing is important for various aspects of its function, including its ability to productively interact with target genes that require chromatin remodeling for activation.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Residues in the ligand binding domain that confer progestin or glucocorticoid specificity and modulate the receptor transactivation capacity.

To localize regions conferring ligand binding specificity of the human glucocorticoid (hGR) and progesterone (hPR) receptors, we constructed chimeras comprising the DNA-binding domain of the yeast transcription factor GAL4, linked to the ligand binding domain of hGR or hPR. Replacement of a sequence of hGR encompassing helices H6 and H7 with the homologous sequence from hPR creates a chimeric protein GP3, which binds the progestin RU 27987 with high affinity, and results in a concomitant loss of glucocorticoid binding [dexamethasone (DEX), RU 43044]. Moreover, GP3 is not able to mediate RU 27987-induced transactivation. A detailed mutational analysis of this sequence and the study of the recently solved hPR crystal structure revealed five residues that confer progestin responsiveness to GR or modulate ligand binding and transcriptional activation. Notably, the simultaneous presence of residues Ser637 and Phe639 on GP3, lining the ligand binding pocket, is specifically involved in RU 27987 binding. The absence of residues Asp641, Gln642, and Leu647 on GP3 is accountable for the lack of glucocorticoids binding on GP3. Unlike residue 642, residues 641 and 647 are not in direct contact with the ligand and most likely act through steric-mediated interactions. The presence of Gln642 and Leu647 are determinant for transcriptional activation in response to DEX and RU 27987, respectively. DEX-dependent transactivation is further enhanced by the presence of Leu647.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2001

Stromal PRs mediate induction of 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 expression in human endometrial epithelium: a paracrine mechanism for inactivation of E2.

Progesterone stimulates the expression of 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD) type 2, which catalyzes the conversion of the potent estrogen, E2, to an inactive form, estrone, in epithelial cells of human endometrial tissue. Various effects of progesterone on uterine epithelium have recently been shown to be mediated by stromal PRs in mice. We describe herein a critical paracrine mechanism whereby progesterone induction of 17beta-HSD type 2 enzyme activity, transcript levels, and promoter activity in human endometrial epithelial cells are mediated primarily by PR in endometrial stromal cells. Medium conditioned with progestin-pretreated human endometrial stromal cells robustly increased 17beta-HSD type 2 enzyme activity (2-fold) and mRNA levels (13.2-fold) in Ishikawa malignant endometrial epithelial cells. In contrast, direct progestin treatment of Ishikawa epithelial cells gave rise to much smaller increases in enzyme activity (1.2-fold) and mRNA levels (4-fold). These results suggest that progesterone- dependent paracrine factors arising from stromal cells are primarily responsible for the induction of epithelial 17beta-HSD type 2 expression in the endometrium. We transfected serial deletion mutants of the -1,244 bp 5'-flanking region of the 17beta-HSD type 2 gene into Ishikawa cells. No progesterone response elements could be identified upstream of the 17beta-HSD type 2 promoter. Stromal PR-dependent induction of the 17beta-HSD type 2 promoter was mediated by a critical regulatory region mapped to the -200/-100 bp sequence. Direct treatment of Ishikawa cells with progestin gave rise to a maximal increase in the activity of -200 bp/Luciferase construct only by 1.2-fold, whereas medium conditioned by progestin-pretreated endometrial stromal cells increased promoter activity up to 2.4-fold in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. The stimulatory effect of medium conditioned by progestin-pretreated stromal cells was enhanced strikingly by increasing stromal cell PR levels with the addition of estrogen. This epithelial-stromal interaction was specific for endometrial epithelial cells, since 17beta-HSD type 2 could not be induced in malignant breast epithelial cells by media conditioned with progestin-treated breast or endometrial stromal cells. In conclusion, progesterone regulates the conversion of biologically active E2 to estrone by inducing the 17beta-HSD type 2 enzyme in human endometrial epithelium primarily via PR in stromal cells, which secrete factors that induce transcription mediated primarily by the -200/-100 bp 5'-regulatory region of the 17beta-HSD type 2 promoter.

17-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenases↗
PubMed2001

New antiprogestins with partial agonist activity: potential selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) and probes for receptor- and coregulator-induced changes in progesterone receptor induction properties.

A pharmacologically relevant property of steroid hormone-regulated gene induction is the partial agonist activity of antisteroid complexes. We now report that dexamethasone-mesylate (Dex-Mes) and dexamethasone-oxetanone (Dex-Ox), each a derivative of the glucocorticoid-selective steroid dexamethasone (Dex), are two new antiprogestins with significant amounts of agonist activity with both the A and B isoforms of progesterone receptor (PR), for different progesterone-responsive elements, and in several cell lines. These compounds continue to display activity under conditions where another partial antiprogestin (RTI-020) is inactive. These new antiprogestins were used to determine whether the partial agonist activity of PR complexes can be modified by changing concentrations of receptor or coregulator, as we have recently demonstrated for glucocorticoid receptors (GRs). Because GR and coregulator concentrations simultaneously altered the position of the physiologically relevant dose-response curve, and associated EC(50), of GR-agonist complexes, we also examined this phenomenon with PR. We find that elevated PR or transcriptional intermediary factor 2 (TIF2) concentrations increase the partial agonist activity of Dex-Mes and Dex-Ox, and the EC(50) of agonists, independently of changes in total gene transactivation. Furthermore, the corepressors SMRT (silencing mediator for retinoid and thyroid receptors) and NCoR (nuclear receptor corepressor) each suppresses gene induction but NCoR acts opposite to SMRT and, like the coactivator TIF2, reduces the EC(50) and increases the partial agonist activity of antiprogestins. These comparable responses of GR and PR suggest that variations in receptor and coregulator concentrations may be a general mechanism for altering the induction properties of other steroid receptors. Finally, the magnitude of coregulator effects on PR induction properties are often not identical for agonists and the new antagonists, suggesting subtle mechanistic differences. These properties of Dex-Mes and Dex-Ox, plus the sensitivity of their activity to cellular differences in PR and coregulator concentrations, make these steroids potential new SPRMs (selective progesterone receptor modulators) that should prove useful as probes of PR induction properties.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Effects of hormone and cellular modulators of protein phosphorylation on transcriptional activity, DNA binding, and phosphorylation of human progesterone receptors.

Human progesterone receptors (PR) in T47D breast cancer cells are synthesized as two different sized proteins, PR-A [94 kilodaltons (kDa)] and PR-B (120 kDa). Progestin addition to cells (in vivo) causes a 2-fold increase in total phosphorylation of PR and an increase in the apparent mol wt of both PR-A and PR-B on sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-gels. Time-course experiments showed that increased PR phosphorylation that results from hormone addition is a multistep process and involves a rapid increase into total 32P labeling that takes place before the more slowly occurring phosphorylation(s) responsible for the change in electrophoretic mobility of PR on SDS-gels. As an approach to test whether phosphorylation is involved in regulating PR activity, we have examined the effects of cellular modulators of protein phosphorylation on PR-mediated target gene transcription in vivo using a T47D cloned cell line containing a stably transfected mouse mammary tumor virus-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase construct. Treatment with 8-bromo-cAMP (activator of cAMP-dependent protein kinases) or okadaic acid (protein phosphatase-1 and -2A inhibitor) did not stimulate target gene expression in the absence of progestin. When added together with progestin, either compound augmented PR-mediated target gene transcription by 3- to 4-fold. The cyclic nucleotide-dependent protein kinase inhibitor H8 completely blocked target gene responsiveness to hormone. Neither 8-bromo-cAMP, okadaic acid, nor H8 altered the hormone- or DNA-binding activities of PR, as measured in vitro or affected cellular concentrations of PR. These agents, therefore, appeared to selectively modulate PR transcriptional activity. Moreover, none of these compounds altered expression from a control reporter gene, pSV2CAT, indicating that these agents affect PR-mediated processes directly and are not acting through a general effect on transcription. Effects on PR phosphorylation were assessed by measuring 32P labeling of PR in vivo. None of these treatments had a substantial effect on the extent of total 32P labeling of immune isolated PR or on the phosphorylation(s) responsible for PR up-shifts on SDS-gels. This suggests that these agents modulate PR transcriptional activity either through phosphorylation of another protein intimately involved in PR-mediated transcription or through modification of a key site(s) not measurable as a change in total PR phosphorylation or electrophoretic mobility on SDS gels.

8-Bromo Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate↗
PubMed1993

The constitution of a progesterone response element.

Progesterone receptors (PRs) recognize and bind to DNA in a sequence-specific manner. To define the sequence-specific determinants of PR binding to DNA, we employed a detailed series of target elements and analyzed both PR binding in vitro and PR-mediated activation of a reporter gene in vivo. These elements represent point substitution or insertion mutants of a progesterone response element derived from the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV). Substitution of a G for the first T in the 15-base pair (bp) MMTV progesterone response element core sequence, GTTACAAACTGTTCT, increases PR-DNA binding in vitro. All other tested mutations within this sequence either had no effect or decreased PR binding. From these analyses, we infer an optimal PR recognition sequence, -7RGNACANRNTGTNCY+7, composed of hexameric half-sites separated by precisely 3 bp and exhibiting dyad symmetry. Limited substitution of a suboptimal base for an optimal base, as in the wild type MMTV element, can be tolerated, but further suboptimal substitutions significantly decrease binding by PR. The identity of 1 bp within the hexameric half-site, position +/- 5, is unconstrained. Transition mutations, but not transversions, are permitted at position +/- 7. Here the hydrogen bond acceptor of the N-7 position of the purine ring may be involved in receptor recognition, since this feature is shared by the permitted substitutions. Insertion of a single base pair between the half-sites abolishes detectable binding, suggesting that the spatial orientation of the DNA binding domains of the monomeric receptor subunits are fixed by dimerization of the receptor. This pattern of sequence-specific recognition parallels that previously inferred for the glucocorticoid receptor, indicating that the two receptors may be unable to distinguish individual target sites. Each of the mutant response elements was also assessed for its ability to confer progestin responsiveness to a truncated MMTV promoter when introduced into a PR-containing cell line. Elements exhibiting strong receptor binding in vitro were fully inducible, whereas poorly inducible or uninducible elements displayed little or no recognition by receptor in vitro. However, some elements, though poorly bound in vitro, still activated transcription in vivo in response to hormone. In certain cases activation was as good as that seen with the wild type element. Further examination of in vitro receptor binding by this class of mutant elements using higher levels of baculovirus-expressed receptor revealed that many were indeed recognized by receptor, albeit with a lower affinity than the wild type sequence.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Baculoviridae↗
PubMed1994

The differential capacity of glucocorticoids and progestins to alter chromatin structure and induce gene expression in human breast cancer cells.

The T47D (A1-2) cell line is a human mammary carcinoma-derived cell line that has been engineered to constitutively express comparable levels of both glucocorticoid and progesterone receptors. In addition, these cells possess a stably integrated mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) luciferase reporter gene. Because the MMTV promoter is recognized similarly by both receptors, we have used this cell line to examine the transcriptional regulatory mechanisms employed by the two receptors. The stably integrated MMTV luciferase gene is highly inducible by glucocorticoids, whereas it is almost entirely refractory to induction by progestins. In contrast, a transiently transfected MMTV chloroamphenicol acetyl transferase reporter, while much more inducible by glucocorticoids, can be induced significantly by progestins. The differential inducibility of the stably integrated template is reflected in the superior ability of glucocorticoids to initiate alterations in the chromatin structure of the promoter. Concomitant with the changes in nuclease accessibility, glucocorticoids, unlike progestins, recruit transcription factors to the MMTV promoter. These results emphasize a central role for the modulation of the chromatin environment by steroid receptors in defining their capacity to regulate gene expression in vivo.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1995

Identification of a group of Ser-Pro motif hormone-inducible phosphorylation sites in the human progesterone receptor.

The human progesterone receptor (PR) is a member of the steroid/thyroid hormone superfamily of nuclear receptors. The receptor is expressed as two forms, PR-B and the shorter PR-A, which lacks the NH2-terminal 164 amino acids of PR-B; whereas PR-B seems to be predominantly a transcriptional activator, PR-A also functions as a repressor. Our previous studies of PR expressed in T47D breast cancer cells have shown that PR is a phosphoprotein whose phosphorylation is enhanced in response to hormone. There is an initial rapid (minutes) increase in phosphorylation followed by a slower, less substantial increase, which results in decreased mobility of the receptor on sodium dodecyl sulfate gels. We now report the identification of three phosphorylation sites, which are predominantly phosphorylated during the later phase of the response to hormone. These sites, Ser102, Ser294, and Ser345, are all found in Ser-Pro consensus sequences. Whereas Ser294 and Ser345 are common to PR-A and PR-B, Ser102 is unique to PR-B. Finally, we demonstrate that phosphorylation of Ser345 is associated with the altered mobility on sodium dodecyl sulfate gels.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1981

Specific estradiol binding in schwannomas, meningiomas, and neurofibromas.

The cytoplasmic fractions of schwannomas (acoustic neuromas), meningiomas, and neurofibromas were assayed for the presence of estrogen receptors. Specific estradiol binding was detected in 7 of 16 schwannomas, 7 of 10 meningiomas, and 1 of 6 neurofibromas. A nontumorous vestibular nerve was also studied and showed no estradiol binding. In the tumors, the concentration of the estradiol binding sites as estimated by saturation binding analysis covered a wide range of values (21 to 2430 fmol/g of tumor) but, overall, meningiomas contained the highest amount of estradiol binder. A Scatchard plot analysis of one of the schwannoma specimens demonstrated high affinity estradiol binding (Ka = 1.695 X 10(10) M-1). Although there were more females than males in each tumor category, the overall incidence of estradiol binding was similar in males (5 of 11, 45%) and in females (10 of 21, 48%). In 5 cases, progestin binding was also measured and was detected in two meningiomas (both from female patients); one meningioma and two neurofibromas showed no progestin binding. A discussion is presented of the possible role of estradiol in the pathogenesis or modulation of meningeal and Schwann cell tumors as well as in the genetic disorder neurofibromatosis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Antitumor effects of droloxifene, a new antiestrogen drug, against 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene-induced mammary tumors in rats.

The antitumor effects of droloxifene (DROL, (E)-alpha-[p-[2-(dimethylamino)ethoxy]-phenyl]-alpha-ethyl-3-stilbeno l), a new antiestrogen drug, on 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA)-induced estrogen-dependent mammary tumors in rats were studied and compared with those of tamoxifen (TAM). Mammary tumors appeared from about 2 months after p.o. administration of DMBA to female rats, and all of them were estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor positive. DROL and TAM (p.o.) inhibited the growth of the tumors. Both drugs inhibited the binding of 125I-estradiol-17 beta to ER in the cytosol of the tumor in vitro, and the effect of DROL was much stronger than that of TAM. When 3H-estradiol-17 beta (3H-E2) was given s.c. to rats with the mammary tumors, 3H-E2 accumulated in the tumors, uteri and vaginae in which the ER levels are known to be high, but was low in the heart, in which the ER levels are normally low. DROL and TAM decreased the levels of 3H-E2 in the tumors, uteri and vaginae, but had no effect in the hearts. When DROL or TAM was given p.o. to rats daily for 7 consecutive days after administration of DMBA, they inhibited the induction of mammary tumors by DMBA. From these results, DROL inhibits the growth and the initiation of DMBA-induced mammary tumors by inhibiting the binding of estrogen to its receptor.

9,10-Dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene↗