SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Notch”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 631 records · Page 35Linked to original sources

PubMed2005

Notch signaling coordinates the patterning of striatal compartments.

Numerous lines of evidence suggest that Notch signaling plays a pivotal role in controlling the production of neurons from progenitor cells. However, most experiments have relied on gain-of-function approaches because perturbation of Notch signaling results in death prior to the onset of neurogenesis. Here, we examine the requirement for Notch signaling in the development of the striatum through the analysis of different single and compound Notch1 conditional and Notch3 null mutants. We find that normal development of the striatum depends on the presence of appropriate Notch signals in progenitors during a critical window of embryonic development. Early removal of Notch1 prior to neurogenesis alters early-born patch neurons but not late-born matrix neurons in the striatum. We further show that the late-born striatal neurons in these mutants are spared as a result of functional compensation by Notch3. Notably, however, the removal of Notch signaling subsequent to cells leaving the germinal zone has no obvious effect on striatal organization and patterning. These results indicate that Notch signaling is required in neural progenitor cells to control cell fate in the striatum, but is dispensable during subsequent phases of neuronal migration and differentiation.

Animals↗

PubMed1991

A homolog of Drosophila Notch expressed during mammalian development.

Drosophila Notch and the related Caenorhabditis elegans proteins lin-12 and glp-1 function as mediators of local cell-cell interactions required for cell-fate decisions during invertebrate development. To investigate the possibility that similar proteins play determinative roles during mammalian development, we isolated cDNA clones encoding rat Notch. The deduced amino acid sequence of this protein contains 36 epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like repeats, and is remarkably similar in both its extracellular and cytoplasmic domains to the sequence of Xenopus Xotch and Drosophila Notch. In the developing central nervous system, in situ hybridisation analyses revealed that Notch transcripts were dramatically restricted to the ventricular proliferative zones of embryonic neuroepithelia. Notch was also strongly expressed during development of non-neural tissues, such as hair follicles and tooth buds, whose correct differentiation requires epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. These data support the hypothesis that Notch plays an essential role in mammalian development and pattern formation that closely parallels its role in the development of invertebrates.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1993

Altered epidermal growth factor-like sequences provide evidence for a role of Notch as a receptor in cell fate decisions.

In Drosophila each neural precursor is chosen from a group of cells through cell interactions mediated by Notch and Delta which may function as receptor and ligand (signal), respectively, in a lateral signalling pathway. The cells of a group are equipotential and express both Notch and Delta. Hyperactive mutant Notch molecules, (Abruptex), probably have an enhanced affinity for the ligand. When adjacent to wild-type cells, cells bearing the Abruptex proteins are unable to produce the signal. It is suggested that in addition to the binding of Notch molecules on one cell to the Delta molecules of opposing cells, the Notch and Delta proteins on the surface of the same cell may interact. Binding between a cell's own Notch and Delta molecules would alter the availability of these proteins to interact with their counterparts on adjacent cells.

Animals↗

PubMed1994

The formation of commissures in the Drosophila CNS depends on the midline cells and on the Notch gene.

The commissures of the Drosophila central nervous system (CNS) are formed in close relation to the ventral midline cells, a morphologically distinct set of cells located at the midline of the developing CNS. To analyze the function of these cells during commissure formation, we looked for mutations that result in the absence of commissures. One example of a gene that can give rise to such a phenotype is the neurogenic gene Notch. Here we show that mutant Notch embryos are devoid of commissural connections and have an abnormal midline. The midline cells of the embryonic Drosophila CNS are specified during the blastoderm stage about two hours before the first neuroblasts start to delaminate from the neurogenic region. To analyze Notch function for commissure development further, we took advantage of the Notchts1 allele. Temperature-shift experiments demonstrated that the lack of commissures in mutant Notch embryos results from defects in the analage of the CNS midline cells. Here maternal as well as zygotic Notch function are required for the correct activation of the gene single-minded, since mutant Notch embryos derived from germ-line clones lack most of the single-minded-positive midline cells.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

A dominant-negative form of Serrate acts as a general antagonist of Notch activation.

Specification of the dorsal-ventral compartment boundary in the developing Drosophila wing disc requires activation of NOTCH from its dorsal ligand SERRATE and its ventral ligand DELTA. Both NOTCH ligands are required in this process and one cannot be substituted for the other. In the wing disc, expression of a dominant-negative, truncated form of SERRATE called BD(G), is capable of inhibiting NOTCH activation in the ventral but not the dorsal compartments. We demonstrate that BD(G) can act as a general antagonist of both SERRATE and DELTA mediated NOTCH interactions, however, BD(G) retains the SERRATE protein domain targeted by FRINGE, hence its antagonistic effects are restricted in the dorsal wing disc. Our findings suggest a model in which ligand binding to NOTCH is a necessary but insufficient step toward NOTCH activation.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Cell proliferation control by Notch signaling in Drosophila development.

The Notch receptor mediates cell interactions controlling the developmental fate of a broad spectrum of undifferentiated cells. By modulating Notch signaling in specific precursor cells during Drosophila imaginal disc development, we demonstrate that Notch activity can influence cell proliferation. The activation of the Notch receptor in the wing disc induces the expression of the wing margin patterning genes vestigial and wingless, and strong mitotic activity. However, the effect of Notch signaling on cell proliferation is not the simple consequence of the upregulation of either vestigial or wingless. Vestigial and Wingless, on the contrary, display synergistic effects with Notch signaling, resulting in the stimulation of cell proliferation in imaginal discs.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

The Notch pathway helps to pattern the tips of the Drosophila tracheal branches by selecting cell fates.

The Drosophila tracheal system consists of a stereotyped network of epithelial tubes formed by several tracheal cell types. By the end of embryogenesis, when the general branching pattern is established, some specialised tracheal cells then mediate branch fusion while others extend fine terminal branches. Here evidence is presented that the Notch signalling pathway acts directly in the tracheal cells to distinguish individual fates within groups of equivalent cells. Notch helps to single out those tracheal cells that mediate branch fusion by blocking their neighbours from adopting the same fate. This function of Notch would require the restricted activation of the pathway in specific cells. In addition, and probably later, Notch also acts in the selection of those tracheal cells that extend the terminal branches. Both the localised expression and the mutant phenotypes of Delta, a known ligand for Notch, suggest that Delta may activate Notch to specify cell fates at the tips of the developing tracheal branches.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

A micromere induction signal is activated by beta-catenin and acts through notch to initiate specification of secondary mesenchyme cells in the sea urchin embryo.

At fourth cleavage of sea urchin embryos four micromeres at the vegetal pole separate from four macromeres just above them in an unequal cleavage. The micromeres have the capacity to induce a second axis if transplanted to the animal pole and the absence of micromeres at the vegetal pole results in the failure of macromere progeny to specify secondary mesenchyme cells (SMCs). This suggests that micromeres have the capacity to induce SMCs. We demonstrate that micromeres require nuclear beta-catenin to exhibit SMC induction activity. Transplantation studies show that much of the vegetal hemisphere is competent to receive the induction signal. The micromeres induce SMCs, most likely through direct contact with macromere progeny, or at most a cell diameter away. The induction is quantitative in that more SMCs are induced by four micromeres than by one. Temporal studies show that the induction signal is passed from the micromeres to macromere progeny between the eighth and tenth cleavage. If micromeres are removed from hosts at the fourth cleavage, SMC induction in hosts is rescued if they later receive transplanted micromeres between the eighth and tenth cleavage. After the tenth cleavage addition of induction-competent micromeres to micromereless embryos fails to specify SMCs. For macromere progeny to be competent to receive the micromere induction signal, beta-catenin must enter macromere nuclei. The macromere progeny receive the micromere induction signal through the Notch receptor. Signaling-competent micromeres fail to induce SMCs if macromeres express dominant-negative Notch. Expression of an activated Notch construct in macromeres rescues SMC specification in the absence of induction-competent micromeres. These data are consistent with a model whereby beta-catenin enters the nuclei of micromeres and, as a consequence, the micromeres produce an inductive ligand. Between the eighth and tenth cleavage micromeres induce SMCs through Notch. In order to be receptive to the micromere inductive signal the macromeres first must transport beta-catenin to their nuclei, and as one consequence the Notch pathway becomes competent to receive the micromere induction signal, and to transduce that signal. As Notch is maternally expressed in macromeres, additional components must be downstream of nuclear beta-catenin in macromeres for these cells to receive and transduce the micromere induction signal.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Notch signalling acts in postmitotic avian myogenic cells to control MyoD activation.

During Drosophila myogenesis, Notch signalling acts at multiple steps of the muscle differentiation process. In vertebrates, Notch activation has been shown to block MyoD activation and muscle differentiation in vitro, suggesting that this pathway may act to maintain the cells in an undifferentiated proliferative state. In this paper, we address the role of Notch signalling in vivo during chick myogenesis. We first demonstrate that the Notch1 receptor is expressed in postmitotic cells of the myotome and that the Notch ligands Delta1 and Serrate2 are detected in subsets of differentiating myogenic cells and are thus in position to signal to Notch1 during myogenic differentiation. We also reinvestigate the expression of MyoD and Myf5 during avian myogenesis, and observe that Myf5 is expressed earlier than MyoD, consistent with previous results in the mouse. We then show that forced expression of the Notch ligand, Delta1, during early myogenesis, using a retroviral system, has no effect on the expression of the early myogenic markers Pax3 and Myf5, but causes strong down-regulation of MyoD in infected somites. Although Delta1 overexpression results in the complete lack of differentiated muscles, detailed examination of the infected embryos shows that initial formation of a myotome is not prevented, indicating that exit from the cell cycle has not been blocked. These results suggest that Notch signalling acts in postmitotic myogenic cells to control a critical step of muscle differentiation.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Notch signaling represses the glial fate in fly PNS.

By using gain-of-function mutations it has been proposed that vertebrate Notch promotes the glial fate. We show in vivo that glial cells are produced at the expense of neurons in the peripheral nervous system of flies lacking Notch and that constitutively activated Notch produces the opposite phenotype. Notch acts as a genetic switch between neuronal and glial fates by negatively regulating glial cell deficient/glial cells missing, the gene required in the glial precursor to induce gliogenesis. Moreover, Notch represses neurogenesis or gliogenesis, depending on the sensory organ type. Numb, which is asymmetrically localized in the multipotent cell that produces the glial precursor, induces glial cells at the expense of neurons. Thus, a cell-autonomous mechanism inhibits Notch signaling.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Context-dependent utilization of Notch activity in Drosophila glial determination.

During Drosophila neurogenesis, glial differentiation depends on the expression of glial cells missing (gcm). Understanding how glial fate is achieved thus requires knowledge of the temporal and spatial control mechanisms directing gcm expression. A recent report showed that in the adult bristle lineage, gcm expression is negatively regulated by Notch signaling ( Van De Bor, V. and Giangrande, A. (2001). Development 128, 1381-1390). Here we show that the effect of Notch activation on gliogenesis is context-dependent. In the dorsal bipolar dendritic (dbd) sensory lineage in the embryonic peripheral nervous system (PNS), asymmetric cell division of the dbd precursor produces a neuron and a glial cell, where gcm expression is activated in the glial daughter. Within the dbd lineage, Notch is specifically activated in one of the daughter cells and is required for gcm expression and a glial fate. Thus Notch activity has opposite consequences on gcm expression in two PNS lineages. Ectopic Notch activation can direct gliogenesis in a subset of embryonic PNS lineages, suggesting that Notch-dependent gliogenesis is supported in certain developmental contexts. We present evidence that POU-domain protein Nubbin/PDM-1 is one of the factors that provide such context.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Modulation of the notch signaling by Mash1 and Dlx1/2 regulates sequential specification and differentiation of progenitor cell types in the subcortical telencephalon.

Notch signaling has a central role in cell fate specification and differentiation. We provide evidence that the Mash1 (bHLH) and Dlx1 and Dlx2 (homeobox) transcription factors have complementary roles in regulating Notch signaling, which in turn mediates the temporal control of subcortical telencephalic neurogenesis in mice. We defined progressively more mature subcortical progenitors (P1, P2 and P3) through their combinatorial expression of MASH1 and DLX2, as well as the expression of proliferative and postmitotic cell markers at E10.5-E11.5. In the absence of Mash1, Notch signaling is greatly reduced and 'early' VZ progenitors (P1 and P2) precociously acquire SVZ progenitor (P3) properties. Comparing the molecular phenotypes of the delta-like 1 and Mash1 mutants, suggests that Mash1 regulates early neurogenesis through Notch-and Delta-dependent and -independent mechanisms. While Mash1 is required for early neurogenesis (E10.5), Dlx1 and Dlx2 are required to downregulate Notch signaling during specification and differentiation steps of 'late' progenitors (P3). We suggest that alternate cell fate choices in the developing telencephalon are controlled by coordinated functions of bHLH and homeobox transcription factors through their differential affects on Notch signaling.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Notch is required for outgrowth of the Xenopus tail bud.

It has previously been shown that Notch, Delta and Lunatic Fringe are expressed together in the leading edge of the tail bud of the Xenopus embryo prior to outgrowth (Beck and Slack, 1998). It has also been shown that ectopic expression of a constitutive form of Notch, Notch-ICD, will provoke ectopic tail formation (Beck and Slack, 1999). Here we show that inhibition of Notch activity in vivo prevents outgrowth of the tail bud. This is achieved using inhibitors of the protease that carries out the ligand-induced intramembranous cleavage of Notch. Other protease inhibitors that do not inhibit Notch cleavage do not affect tail outgrowth.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Effects of Delta1 and Jagged1 on early human hematopoiesis: correlation with expression of notch signaling-related genes in CD34+ cells.

It has been shown that Notch signaling mediated by ligands of both Jagged and Delta families expands the hematopoietic stem cell compartment while blocking or delaying terminal myeloid differentiation. Here we show that Delta1- and Jagged1-expressing stromal cells have distinct effects on the clonogenic and differentiation capacities of human CD34(+) CD38(+) cells. Jagged1 increases the number of bipotent colony-forming unit-granulocyte macrophage (CFU-GM) and unipotent progenitors (CFU-granulocytes and CFU-macrophages), without quantitatively affecting terminal cell differentiation, whereas Delta1 reduces the number of CFU-GM and differentiated monocytic cells. Expression analysis of genes coding for Notch receptors, Notch targets, and Notch signaling modulators in supernatant CD34(+) cells arising upon contact with Jagged1 and Delta1 shows dynamic and differential gene expression profiles over time. At early time points, modest upregulation of Notch1, Notch3, and Hes1 was observed in Jagged1-CD34(+) cells, whereas those in contact with Delta1 strikingly upregulated Notch3 and Hes1. Later, myeloid progenitors with strong clonogenic potential emerging upon contact with Jagged1 upregulated Notch1 and Deltex and downregulated Notch signaling modulators, whereas T/NK progenitors originated by Delta1 strikingly upregulated Notch3 and Deltex and, to a lesser extent, Hes1, Lunatic Fringe, and Numb. Together, the data unravel previously unrecognized expression patterns of Notch signaling-related genes in CD34(+) CD38(+) cells as they develop in Jagged1- or Delta1-stromal cell environments, which appear to reflect sequential maturational stages of CD34(+) cells into distinct cell lineages.

Antigens, CD34↗

PubMed2006

Notch signaling is inactive but inducible in human embryonic stem cells.

The NOTCH signaling pathway performs a wide range of critical functions in a number of different cell types during development and differentiation. The role of NOTCH signals in human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) has not been tested. We measured the activity of canonical NOTCH signaling in undifferentiated embryonic stem (ES) cells and tested the requirement for NOTCH activity in hESC self-renewal or differentiation by growing hESCs in the presence of gamma-secretase inhibitors. Our results suggest that NOTCH signaling is not required for the propagation of undifferentiated human ES cells but instead is required for the maintenance of the differentiating cell types that accumulate in human ES cell cultures. Our studies suggest that NOTCH signaling is not required in human embryonic differentiation until the formation of extraembryonic, germ layer, or tissue-specific stem cells and progenitors.

Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases↗

PubMed2003

Notch signaling augments T cell responsiveness by enhancing CD25 expression.

Notch receptors signal through a highly conserved pathway to influence cell fate decisions. Notch1 is required for T lineage commitment; however, a role for Notch signaling has not been clearly defined for the peripheral T cell response. Notch gene expression is induced, and Notch1 is activated in primary CD4(+) T cells following specific peptide-Ag stimulation. Notch activity contributes to the peripheral T cell response, as inhibition of endogenous Notch activation decreases the proliferation of activated T cells in a manner associated with the diminished production of IL-2 and the expression of the high affinity IL-2R (CD25). Conversely, forced expression of a constitutively active Notch1 in primary T cells results in increased surface expression of CD25, and renders these cells more sensitive to both cognate Ag and IL-2, as measured by cell division. These data suggest an important role for Notch signaling during CD4(+) T cell responses, which operates through augmenting a positive feedback loop involving IL-2 and its high affinity receptor.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

PubMed2003

TCR-mediated Notch signaling regulates proliferation and IFN-gamma production in peripheral T cells.

Notch genes encode membrane receptors that regulate cell fate decisions in metazoa. Notch receptors and ligands are expressed in developing lymphoid tissue and mature lymphocytes and the role of Notch signaling in early T and B cell development has been studied extensively. However, its contribution to mature T cell function is unknown. TCR-mediated T cell activation is a fundamental process of the adaptive immune system that has been studied for decades; however, the details of this process are incompletely understood. In this study, we present evidence that Notch is required for TCR-mediated activation of peripheral T cells. Inhibition of Notch activation dramatically decreases T cell proliferation in both CD4 and CD8 cells and blocks both NF-kappaB activity and IFN-gamma production in peripheral T cells. Our data reveal a new, nondevelopmental function of Notch as a previously unknown key link in peripheral T cell activation and cytokine secretion.

Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases↗

PubMed2002

Cysteine-rich region of X-Serrate-1 is required for activation of Notch signaling in Xenopus primary neurogenesis.

The Notch family genes encode single-pass transmembrane proteins which function in a variety of cell fate specifications in invertebrates and vertebrates. In Xenopus primary neurogenesis, the Notch ligands, X-Delta-1 and X-Serrate-1, mediate Notch signaling and regulate cell differentiation. In the present study, we examined the role of the Serrate-specific cysteine-rich (CR) region in the primary neurogenesis of Xenopus embryos. The ligand constructs containing the DSL (Delta/Serrate/Lag-2) domain in the extracellular region caused a reduction in primary neurons, whereas the DSL-deleted form of X-Delta-1 resulted in the overproduction of primary neurons. However, the DSL-deleted form of X-Serrate-1 or the construct containing only the CR region in the extracellular domain (SerCR) reduced the number of primary neurons. In contrast, the CR-deleted form of X-Serrate-1 (SerACR) lost activity as a Notch ligand, regardless of the presence of the DSL domain within the extracellular domain. Overexpression of X-Delta-1 and X-Serrate-1 strongly induced the expression of Xenopus ESR-1 (XESR-1), a gene related to Drosophila Enhancer of split. SerCR alone also moderately induced the expression of XESR-1, but the SerACR form did not induce this expression. Co-injection of X-Notch-1deltaICD, which deletes the intracellular domain (ICD), with SerCR suppressed a neurogenic phenotype, although co-injection of X-Su(H)1DBM with SerCR did not, indicating that SerCR affects primary neurogenesis through the Notch/Su(H) pathway. These results suggestthatthe CR region of Xenopus Serrate is required for the activation of Notch signaling and cell fate specification in primary neurogenesis.

Animals↗