Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Motion”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 631 records · Page 35Linked to original sources
PubMed1994

Effects of motion sickness and antimotion sickness drugs on gastric function.

This study examined the effects of motion sickness and antimotion sickness drugs on gastric emptying (GE). Drugs were tested in normal and motion sick subjects. To induce motion sickness, subjects performed head movements while seated in a rotating chair. Gastric emptying of liquid (300 mL) was determined by nuclear medicine techniques, whereas gastric electrical activity, the electrogastrogram (EGG), was monitored from surface (cutaneous) electrodes positioned over the abdominal area. Gastric emptying was severely inhibited at the peak of motion sickness symptoms, but returned to normal 15 minutes later when symptoms abated. In normal (non-motion sick) subjects intramuscular (IM) scopolamine (0.1 mg) and IM promethazine (25 mg) inhibited GE, whereas erythromycin ethylsuccinate (EES) suspension (200 mg) given orally increased GE. When administered to motion sick subjects, IM scopolamine and IM promethazine added slightly, but not significantly, to the inhibition of GE already present. Oral EES did not significantly alter GE in motion sick subjects. Although EGG frequency remained within normal limits (approximately 2.5-3.5 cpm) after liquid ingestion in both normal and motion sick subjects, EGG amplitude was differentially affected in the two groups. Electrogastrogram amplitude increased twofold to fourfold after liquid ingestion in normal, but not in motion sick subjects. The results suggest that (1) maximal inhibition of GE is coincident with peak motion sickness symptoms, (2) both IM scopolamine and IM promethazine inhibit GE in normal subjects, but do not add significantly to the inhibition of GE already established during motion sickness, (3) orally administered erythromycin enhances GE in normal, but not in motion sickness subjects, and (4) the normal stimulatory effect of liquid ingestion on gastric motility does not occur in motion sick subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Visual and non-visual cues in the perception of linear self-motion.

Surprisingly little is known of the perceptual consequences of visual or vestibular stimulation in updating our perceived position in space as we move around. We assessed the roles of visual and vestibular cues in determining the perceived distance of passive, linear self motion. Subjects were given cues to constant-acceleration motion: either optic flow presented in a virtual reality display, physical motion in the dark or combinations of visual and physical motions. Subjects indicated when they perceived they had traversed a distance that had been previously given to them either visually or physically. The perceived distance of motion evoked by optic flow was accurate relative to a previously presented visual target but was perceptually equivalent to about half the physical motion. The perceived distance of physical motion in the dark was accurate relative to a previously presented physical motion but was perceptually equivalent to a much longer visually presented distance. The perceived distance of self motion when both visual and physical cues were present was more closely perceptually equivalent to the physical motion experienced rather than the simultaneous visual motion, even when the target was presented visually. We discuss this dominance of the physical cues in determining the perceived distance of self motion in terms of capture by non-visual cues. These findings are related to emerging studies that show the importance of vestibular input to neural mechanisms that process self motion.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1998

Motion detection and correction using multi-rotation 180 degrees single-photon emission tomography for thallium myocardial imaging.

Patient and organ motion is a potentially limiting factor in gamma camera single-photon emission tomography (SPET) imaging, as highlighted in stress thallium myocardial SPET, where the heart may exhibit a systematic axial motion (cardiac creep) following stress. Multi-rotation SPET has previously been described as a means of obtaining better raw data for motion detection and correction. This study describes the validation of a computerised motion detection algorithm applied to multi-rotation SPET, and reports measured motions in thallium myocardial stress SPET studies from a single-headed gamma camera. Forty-two patients underwent pharmacological stress (dipyridamole) with leg raising, with injection of 75 MBq thallium-201 and imaging after a 10-min delay to detect or evaluate coronary artery disease. Multi-rotation gamma camera SPET was performed with a single-headed gamma camera, with five sequential rapid (4.5 min) continuous SPET mode rotations over 180 degrees. A one-dimensional cross-correlation alignment technique was applied to the projection images to perform motion detection and correction in the axial direction prior to combining the five data sets for tomographic reconstruction. Validation of the cross-correlation alignment analysis was carried out by performing imaging with measured whole-body axial motions in nine subjects, and by reproducibility measurements on multi-rotation data sets. The effect of the applied motion correction was evaluated by calculating mean differences between image pairs before and after shifting, and the general reliability of the automatic motion detection was checked to within one pixel by visual assessment of 160 image pairs. Validation measurements of the cross-correlation technique gave a mean absolute error of 1.5+/-0.4 mm (0.24+/-0.06pixels) with a maximum error of 3.7 mm (0.6 pixels). In 40 subjects undergoing pharmacological stress 201Tl myocardial SPET imaging, the mean cardiac axial creep movement was calculated as 3.1+/-0.7 mm (0. 49+/-0.11 pixels), with 13 out of 40 (32%) having a calculated motion of 1 pixel (6.3 mm) or more. The automatic image shift was visually judged to be within 1 pixel in all 160 image pair analyses, and the mean pixel value difference between image pairs was reduced following image shifting. It is concluded that multi-rotation 180 degrees SPET imaging provides raw data which allow objective and accurate motion detection of cardiac motion in thallium stress myocardial imaging, whilst the one-dimensional cross-correlation technique demonstrates adequate accuracy and reliability to be applied as an automatic motion screening technique on these data.

Dipyridamole↗
PubMed1996

Measuring the attentional speed-up in the motion induction effect.

Motion induction is the illusory motion within an elongated stimulus, such as a bar or a line, when it is preceded by a priming stimulus next to one of its ends. Motion is away from this primer. The presentation of two priming spots at both ends of a stimulus bar results in motion away from both spots with a collision in the center of the bar. With a sufficiently long delay between the spots, motion will be seen only as away from the second spot. Similarly, in a bar with a luminance gradient an illusory motion is perceived as away from the high-luminance end, presumably due to the known dependence of neural processing speed on luminance. In the present study, these two illusory motions were made to oppose each other. The particular luminance gradient which would just cancel the motion induction effect when motion is seen optimally as away from the second spot (cancellation gradient) was determined, resulting again in a collision near the center of the bar. Furthermore, the luminance dependence of the reaction time to stimulus detection was measured in a separate experiment. Thus for each observer, the processing time difference associated with the cancellation gradient was established. This delta t then gives the amount of time by which processing is speeded up in motion induction due to the priming spot. In a simple model of motion processing it can also be identified as the built-in delay delta t of a typical Reichardt-type motion detector. With the present conditions, it varied between 14 and 19 msec for different observers for a bar length of 5.3 deg. In this way, we show not only that the priming effect in motion induction can be understood as a speed-up of neural processing, but also provide a way of measuring the times involved. In additional experiments, we examined the effect of bar length and luminance profile. These results allow us to estimate the gradients of the attentional fields.

Attention↗
PubMed1995

The perceived speed of second-order motion and its dependence on stimulus contrast.

Speed matches were obtained, using a spatial two-alternative forced-choice task, between a second-order motion stimulus and a first-order motion stimulus. The second-order motion stimulus was composed of contrast-modulated noise [produced by multiplying two-dimensional (2-d), static noise by a drifting, one-dimensional (1-d) sinusoid]. The first-order motion stimulus was composed of luminance-modulated noise (produced by summing, rather than multiplying, 2-d noise and a drifting sine grafting). In Expt 1, the relationship between the perceived speed of first- and second-order motion was examined. The motion stimuli had the same spatial frequency (1 or 3 c/deg) and were equated for visibility by presenting them at the same multiple of direction-identification threshold. Over a range of physical speeds, the perceived speeds of the first-order and second-order motion stimuli were identical when their physical speeds were the same. In Expt 2, the effect of varying stimulus "contrast" (contrast modulation depth) on the perceived speed of second-order motion was examined. The contrast of the first-order motion stimulus was fixed and speed matches were obtained for second-order motion stimuli at several contrast modulation depths. The motion stimuli had the same spatial (1 or 4 c/deg) and temporal (5 or 20 Hz) frequencies. It was found that the perceived speed of second-order motion was approximately linearly related to log modulation depth. In agreement with previous studies we also confirmed that the perceived speed of first-order motion is similarly dependent on stimulus contrast (luminance modulation depth).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMedDate not supplied

From 1D to 2D via 3D: dynamics of surface motion segmentation for ocular tracking in primates.

In primates, tracking eye movements help vision by stabilising onto the retinas the images of a moving object of interest. This sensorimotor transformation involves several stages of motion processing, from the local measurement of one-dimensional luminance changes up to the integration of first and higher-order local motion cues into a global two-dimensional motion immune to antagonistic motions arising from the surrounding. The dynamics of this surface motion segmentation is reflected into the various components of the tracking responses and its underlying neural mechanisms can be correlated with behaviour at both single-cell and population levels. I review a series of behavioural studies which demonstrate that the neural representation driving eye movements evolves over time from a fast vector average of the outputs of linear and non-linear spatio-temporal filtering to a progressive and slower accurate solution for global motion. Because of the sensitivity of earliest ocular following to binocular disparity, antagonistic visual motion from surfaces located at different depths are filtered out. Thus, global motion integration is restricted within the depth plane of the object to be tracked. Similar dynamics were found at the level of monkey extra-striate areas MT and MST and I suggest that several parallel pathways along the motion stream are involved albeit with different latencies to build-up this accurate surface motion representation. After 200-300 ms, most of the computational problems of early motion processing (aperture problem, motion integration, motion segmentation) are solved and the eye velocity matches the global object velocity to maintain a clear and steady retinal image.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Binocular correlation does not improve coherence detection for fronto-parallel motion.

We studied the low-level interactions between motion coherence detection and binocular correlation detection. It is well-established that e.g. depth information from motion parallax and from binocular disparities is effectively integrated. The question we aimed to answer is whether such interactions also exist at the very first correlation level that both mechanisms might have in common. First we quantitatively compared motion coherence detection and binocular correlation detection using similar stimuli (random pixels arrays, RPAs) and the same noise masking paradigm (luminance signal to noise ratio, LSNR). This showed that human observers are much more sensitive to motion than to binocular correlation. Adding noise therefore has a much stronger effect on binocular correlation than on motion detection. Next we manipulated the shape of the stimulus aperture to equalize LSNR thresholds for motion and binocular correlation. Motion sensitivity could be progressively reduced by shortening the length of the motion path, while keeping the aperture area constant. Changing the shape of the aperture did not affect binocular correlation sensitivity. A 'balanced' stimulus, one with equal strengths of motion and binocular correlation signals was then used to study the mutual interactions. In accordance with previous results, motion was found to greatly facilitate binocular correlation. Binocular correlation, however did not facilitate motion detection. We conclude that interactions are asymmetrical; fronto-parallel motion is primarily detected monocularly and this information can then be used to facilitate binocular correlation, but binocular correlation cannot improve motion sensitivity.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Attention modulates perception of transparent motion.

Human observers can extract a given motion direction from sets of random dots moving simultaneously in two or more directions in the same region of the visual field, a phenomenon referred to as motion transparency. As a necessary condition for separating transparent motion directions, low level encoding of local motion signals must generate frequency distributions of local directions with separable peaks corresponding to these directions--this process would be constrained by local stimulus attributes and the properties of local motion detectors. Furthermore, a representation of multiple directions is needed for simultaneous retrieval of several directions in a psychophysical task--this operation would be limited by higher level processes, such as attention selecting a particular direction to rise into awareness. Preliminary observations suggest that the number of directions that can be seen simultaneously is rather limited and the question arises whether this could be related to limitations of low-level encoding or higher level representations. To study specifically the effect of attention on transparent motion perception, observers were presented with sets of dots moving coherently in a variable number of directions, and were asked after the presentation whether one particular direction was present in the set. When the direction of motion was not known before stimulus onset (uncued condition), observers detected a particular motion direction among no more than 3 other directions. When direction of motion was indicated prior to stimulus onset (precued condition), however, this limit increased up to 6 directions. This attentional effect showed some inter-individual variability and appeared to benefit from spatiotemporal integration of the motion signals. A corresponding effect became apparent when observers were tested in the same paradigm whether they could separate two motion directions with variable angular difference between them. In the precued condition a typical minimum direction difference was about 60 degrees, whereas in the uncued condition this was about 120 degrees, suggesting that the performance in detecting one direction in a multiple direction stimulus might be limited by the ability to separate adjacent motion directions. This pattern of results suggests that attention can reliably improve transparent motion processing by affecting the separability of directional signals in low level encoding mechanisms.

Attention↗
PubMed2005

Global shape coding for motion-defined radial-frequency contours.

The visual system is highly skilled at recovering the shape of complex objects defined exclusively by motion cues. But while low-level and high-level mechanisms involved in shape-from-motion have been studied extensively, intermediate computational stages remain poorly understood. In the present study, we used motion-defined radial-frequency contours--or motion RFs--to probe intermediate stages involved in the computation of motion-defined shape. Motion RFs consisted of a virtual circle of Gabor elements whose carriers drifted at speeds determined by a sinusoidal function of polar angle. Motion RFs elicited vivid percepts of shape, and observers could detect and discriminate radial frequencies up to approximately five cycles. Randomizing Gabor speeds over a small contour segment impaired detection and discrimination performance significantly more than predicted by probability summation. Threshold comparisons between spatial-RF and motion-RF contours ruled out that motion-induced shifts in perceived position (i.e., the DeValois effect) determine shape perception in motion RFs. Together, results indicate that the shape of motion RFs is processed by synergistic mechanisms that perform a global analysis of motion cues over space. These results are integrated with data on perceptual interactions between motion RFs and spatial-RFs and are discussed in terms of cue-specific and cue-invariant representations of object shape in human vision.

Cues↗
PubMed2006

Bi-directional illusory position shifts toward the end point of apparent motion.

In this study, we examined the relation between motion induced position shifts and the position shifts caused by saccades. When a stimulus is flashed briefly around the time of a saccade, its perceived position is mislocalized toward the saccade target: if the flash is in front of the saccade the test flash appears shifted in the direction of eye movement; but a test flashed beyond the saccade target is displaced back toward the saccade target (bi-directional saccadic compression: Ross, J., Morrone, M. C., and Burr, D. C. (1997). Compression of visual space before saccades. Nature, 386, 598-601. Motion induced position shifts (in the absence of eye movements) have been demonstrated for a variety of stimuli but the illusory position shift is always found to be in the same direction as the motion. However, all previous studies presented the tests either along or beside the motion path, never beyond its end point. We now test this region beyond the motion path and find that the apparent location of a test in this region is shifted in the direction opposite to the motion, back toward the motion end point. In contrast, when the flash was presented between the beginning and end of the motion path, it is shifted in the direction of motion, again, toward the motion end point. These shifts together indicate a compression of perceived locations toward the end point of the apparent motion. Control experiments confirmed that this effect was neither due to the Fröhlich effect induced by apparent motion from the test flash to the second disc nor to foveal compression. The correspondence between compression toward the end point of apparent motion and saccadic compression toward the saccade target suggests that attentional shifts or planned eye movement signals may play a role in both.

Form Perception↗
PubMed2006

Dichoptic motion perception limited to depth of fixation?

When counterphase spatio-temporal flicker is presented to the left and right eye continuous directional motion can be perceived. Here, we investigate whether this type of dichoptic motion can be observed at different depth planes. Four observers indicated direction of motion for dichoptic motion stimuli, presented in a context containing crossed and uncrossed disparity information in different conditions. Our results show that despite the presence of disparity cues in the stimulus, discrimination of motion direction remained maximal at interocular phase offsets that correspond to binocular motion perception at zero disparity. This constraint brings into question perception of dichoptic motion as the result of an early binocular motion system. We compared our results with predictions of a computational stereo-motion model [Qian, N. (1994). Computing stereo disparity and motion with known binocular cell properties. Neural Computations, 6, 390-404; Qian, N., & Andersen, R. A. (1997). A physiological model for motion-stereo integration and a unified explanation of Pulfrich-like phenomena. Vision Research, 37, 1683-1698]. In contrast to our empirical results, simulations of cell activation in this hybrid energy model predict maximal activation at non-zero disparities. It is concluded that perception of dichoptic motion is a by-product of early interocular combination at low contrasts rather than the result of a dedicated stereo-motion system.

Computer Simulation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effects of superior colliculus inhibition on three-dimensional visual motion processing in the lateral suprasylvian visual area of the cat.

PURPOSE: To determine whether visual inputs from the tectothalamocortical pathway influence three-dimensional motion processing within the lateral suprasylvian (LS) area of the cat. METHODS: Tungsten microelectrodes were used for recording visual-evoked potentials (VEPs) from the LS area of 4 cats. Random dot stereograms were used as visual stimuli. Three-dimensional, motion-triggered VEPs were recorded from the LS area. Each motion sequence consisted of an abrupt onset of motion disparity with a 2 degrees amplitude followed by an abrupt offset and a stationary phase of 900 ms. The velocity of the motion disparity was varied in eight steps from 10 degrees to 400 degrees per second. The onset of motion disparity was used as the trigger for recording the VEPs. Single or multiple injections (two to three) of muscimol were made mainly into the rostral superior colliculus (SC). The amplitudes of the VEPs before and after the muscimol injection were compared. RESULTS: A large negative wave ( N1) with an implicit time of 92.7 +/- 13.5 ms (mean +/- SD, n = 98) was recorded consistently. The amplitude of N1 was significantly larger on stereovision of motion disparity than on either binocular vision of two-dimensional lateral motion or monocular vision, indicating that N1 contains neurons sensitive to motion disparity. The amplitude of N1 was not altered by muscimol injection into the SC at velocities < or =50 degrees/s. On the other hand, the amplitude of N1 was reduced to 66-71% of that observed before muscimol injection at velocities > or =75 degrees/s. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the LS area processes three-dimensional motion inputs via two parallel pathways, the geniculostriate pathway and the tectothalamocortical pathway, at velocities of motion disparity > or =75 degrees/s, while the three-dimensional motion inputs project to the LS area only via the geniculostriate pathway at velocities of motion disparity < or = 50 degrees/s.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Assessment of the functional method of hip joint center location subject to reduced range of hip motion.

Motion analysis of the lower extremities usually requires determination of the location of the hip joint center. The results of several recent studies have suggested that kinematic and kinetic variables calculated from motion analysis data are highly sensitive to errors in hip joint center location. "Functional" methods in which the location of the hip joint center is determined from the relative motion of the thigh and pelvis, rather than from the locations of bony landmarks, are promising but may be ineffective when motion is limited. The aims of the present study were to determine whether the accuracy of the functional method is compromised in young and elderly subjects when limitations on hip motion are imposed and to investigate the possibility of locating the hip joint center using data collected during commonly studied motions (walking, sit-to-stand, stair ascent, stair descent) rather than using data from an ad hoc trial in which varied hip motions are performed. The results of the study suggested that functional methods would result in worst-case hip joint center location errors of 26mm (comparable to the average errors previously reported for joint center location based on bony landmarks) when available hip motion is substantially limited. Much larger errors ( approximately 70mm worst-case), however, resulted when hip joint centers were located from data collected during commonly performed motions, perhaps because these motions are, for the most part, restricted to the sagittal plane. It appears that the functional method can be successfully implemented when range of motion is limited but still requires collection of a special motion trial in which hip motion in both the sagittal and frontal planes is recorded.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Motion distorts perceived depth.

Two important tasks that the visual system has to perform are determining the direction of motion and the spatial location of objects. It has recently been shown that the perceived location of an object moving in the frontal-plane is displaced along the direction of motion (e.g. Nature 397 (1999) 610; Vision Research 31 (1991) 1619). The aim of the present study is to examine the extent of this interaction between motion and perceived location. The observers' task was to indicate which of two vertically separated moving stimuli was closer. The two stimuli were presented at various relative disparity offsets. The stimuli consisted of moving dot patterns (optic-flow) that simulated either fronto-parallel motion (all the dots moved one direction) or motion in depth. Motion of the dots towards the centre of the stimulus simulated object motion away from the observer and motion of the dots away from the centre of the stimulus simulated object motion towards the observer. Results indicate that motion-in-depth information can bias perceived stereoscopic-based depth. Simulated motion towards the observer made the object appear closer to the observer than the depth signalled by the disparity information and simulated motion away from the observer made it seem further away. The results of this study, when combined with those of previous studies, show that motion can distort our entire three dimensional representation of space.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed1998

Temporal resolution of dichoptic and second-order motion mechanisms.

We addressed the question of whether low-level motion analysers can integrate signals binocularly. We compared the temporal sensitivity in motion discrimination tasks using monocular and dichoptic first-order motion and monocular and dichoptic second-order motion. Three human observers were required to discriminate the direction of motion of either sinusoidal gratings (1 c/deg), used as a stimulus for first-order motion analysers, or the envelopes of contrast-modulated stationary sinusoidal gratings (carrier frequency 5 c/deg, carrier contrast 0.1, modulation frequency 1 c/deg), used as a stimulus for second-order motion analysers. Contrast sensitivity was measured as a function of temporal frequency. The moving grating or envelope was generated by summing two non-moving sinusoidally flickering gratings or envelopes in spatiotemporal quadrature. These were either combined monocularly or presented dichoptically. Sensitivity to the moving envelope was highest at a temporal frequency between 0.5 and 2 Hz, depending on the observer, and declined rapidly at high temporal frequencies. None of the observers was able to discriminate the direction of motion of envelopes moving faster than 4 Hz. Dichoptic and monocular presentation produced very similar results. Sensitivity to a monocularly presented moving grating was fairly uniform between 1 and 8 Hz, and declined slightly at 16 Hz. In one of three observers sensitivity to the dichoptically presented grating was very close to that of the monocularly presented grating at all temporal frequencies tested (from 1 to 16 Hz). All observers could discriminate the direction of motion of the dichoptically presented grating at 8 Hz, but two of the three were unable to discriminate its direction of motion at 16 Hz. These results indicate that second-order motion analysers have very poor temporal resolution and that dichoptic motion analysers have very good resolution. We suggest that this implies that there are low-level motion analysers that are capable of integrating information binocularly.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1999

What motion distributions yield global transparency and spatial segmentation?

We have examined the ability of observers to parse bimodal local-motion distributions into two global motion surfaces, either overlapping (yielding transparent motion) or spatially segregated (yielding a motion boundary). The stimuli were random dot kinematograms in which the direction of motion of each dot was drawn from one of two rectangular probability distributions. A wide range of direction distribution widths and separations was tested. The ability to discriminate the direction of motion of one of the two motion surfaces from the direction of a comparison stimulus was used as an objective test of the perception of two discrete surfaces. Performance for both transparent and spatially segregated motion was remarkably good, being only slightly inferior to that achieved with a single global motion surface. Performance was consistently better for segregated motion than for transparency. Whereas transparent motion was only perceived with direction distributions which were separated by a significant gap, segregated motion could be seen with abutting or even partially overlapping direction distributions. For transparency, the critical gap increased with the range of directions in the distribution. This result does not support models in which transparency depends on detection of a minimum size of gap defining a bimodal direction distribution. We suggest, instead, that the operations which detect bimodality are scaled (in the direction domain) with the overall range of distribution. This yields a flexible, adaptive system that determines whether a gap in the direction distribution serves as a segmentation cue or is smoothed as part of a unitary computation of global motion.

Computer Graphics↗
PubMed2002

Neural correlates of perceptual priming of visual motion.

In two experiments, the temporal dynamics of neural activity underlying perceptual priming of visual motion was examined using event-related potentials (ERPs) during directional judgments of the apparent motion of two-dimensional sine-wave gratings. Compared to perceptually ambiguous motion, unambiguous left- or rightward motion was associated with enhanced ERP activity about 300 ms after the onset of apparent motion. In the second experiment, ERPs were recorded to two successive motion jumps in which an unambiguous motion jump served as a prime for a subsequent target motion that was ambiguous. The prime-target time interval was varied between 200, 400, and 1000 ms. In a control (motion reversal) condition, the two motion jumps were both unambiguous but in opposite directions. Compared to the motion reversal condition, motion priming was associated with an enhancement of ERP amplitudes at 100 ms and 350 ms following target stimulus onset. ERP enhancement was greatest at a short prime-target interval of 200 ms, which was also associated behaviorally with the strongest priming. The ERP enhancement and behavioral priming were both eliminated at the long 1000 ms prime-target interval. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from a subset of subjects supported the view that motion priming involves modulation of neural responses both in early visual cortex and in later stages of visual processing.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Spatial displacement limits for cyclopean (stereoscopic) apparent-motion perception.

The range of spatial displacements over which cyclopean (stereoscopic) apparent motion is perceived was investigated. The cyclopean stimuli were created from retinal disparity embedded in dynamic random-dot stereograms. In one experiment, the displacement range for crossed-disparity cyclopean motion was compared with that for luminance-domain motion. The results showed that cyclopean motion was perceived over spatial displacements that were about two to three times larger than the displacements over which luminance motion was perceived. In a second experiment, the displacement range for crossed-disparity cyclopean motion was compared with that for uncrossed-disparity cyclopean motion. The results revealed that the displacement range was restricted (motion quality was poor) for uncrossed motion relative to crossed motion. It is inferred that cyclopean motion from crossed disparity is represented at a coarse spatial scale, relative to luminance motion, and that cyclopean motion from uncrossed disparity is suppressed due to occlusion cues present when uncrossed stimuli are seen behind a textured background.

Female↗