Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “MMPI”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 631 records · Page 35Linked to original sources

The MMPI-168(L) and ADD in assessing psychopathology in individuals with mental retardation: between and within instrument associations.

An abbreviated version of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, the MMPI-168(L), modified for use with clients who have moderate or mild mental retardation, was administered to 58 clients, most of whom had co-existing dual psychiatric diagnoses. Another recently developed instrument, the Assessment of Dual Diagnosis (ADD), was administered by interviewing a knowledgeable care giver. Correlations were examined among the raw scores on the 13 ADD scales and T scores of the 13 MMPI-168(L) scales. Contrary to expectations few correlations were found between the scales of the two instruments including scales purported to assess similar psychological constructs. The major exception was the Mania scale of the MMPI-168(L), which correlated moderately well with the Schizophrenia and Dementia scales of the ADD. Client age correlated strongly and negatively with scores on the Conduct Disorder and Sexual Disorder scales of the ADD. Finally, intra-instrument scale correlations were surprisingly large and, from a clinical and diagnostic perspective, meaningful. However, the large number of intra-instrument correlations showed that the scales of both instruments possess considerable overlap, which could make differential diagnosis problematic. It is suggested that it might be necessary to administer both instruments, and carefully consider behavioral history, to accurately diagnose psychiatric disturbances or personality characteristics of individuals with mental retardation.

Adolescent↗

MMPI changes associated with therapeutic intervention: a migraine control study.

The investigation of personality traits of migraineurs with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) is important research, but so far has led to diverse conclusions. This study aimed to investigate the influences of treatment intervention on the personality of migraineurs. Twenty-three Chinese patients (5 men, 18 women) with migraine (2 with aura, 21 without aura) were given the Chinese edition of the MMPI, before and after treatment, and were compared with 30 nonheadache healthy control subjects (6 men, 24 women). Statistical analyses were made among the three groups. The results revealed that patients in the pretreatment group with migraine had significantly higher scores on subtests of neuroticism (hypochondriasis, depression, hysteria) and schizophrenia. After treatment, the scores on subtests of hysteria, psychasthenia, and schizophrenia were remarkably lower (P < .05); the MMPI profile of the posttreatment group was within the reference range, but the scores of the neurotic scales were still higher than those of the healthy control group (P < .01). These results suggest that after treatment, disturbances in thinking, sentiment, and behavior were eliminated, and anxiety symptoms remarkably reduced, but some "migraine personality" characteristics remained and could influence the long-term results of treatment to some extent. It is suggested that management of migraine should include psychological intervention.

Adolescent↗

MMPI-2 Normative Data for the F-K Index: Implications for Clinical, Neuropsychological, and Forensic Practice

The F-K index has long been used as a validity indicator with the MMPI to help identify subjects who may be over- or underreporting psychological problems. The revision of the MMPI necessitates the collection of new norms and development of cutoff scores for the F-K index due to changes in the test itself as well as changes in the way subjects respond to items since the time of the development of the original test. Continuation of the use of old cutoff scores and clinical lore may lead to erroneous conclusions and decisions in the clinical and forensic arenas in which the index is used. MMPI-2 norms for the F-K index are provided for the standardization sample, and additional data are presented for samples of psychiatric patients, head injured patients, individuals seeking disability benefits, job applicants for police and priest positions, and substance abusers. Implications for use of the tables for interpretation of F-K scores are discussed.

Journal Article↗

Concurrent and Discriminant Validity Between the Hand Test Pathology Score and the MMPI-2

Using an outpatient sample (N = 43), this study assessed the concurrent validity of the Hand Test pathology summary score (PATH) with an objective measure of psychopathology, the MMPI-2 clinical scales. The PATH score did exhibit several significant relations to the MMPI-2 clinical scales. In addition, there is support for divergent validity as none of the MMPI-2 validity scales (L, F, and K) were significantly related with PATH.

Journal Article↗

Comparing the diagnostic validity of an abbreviated and standard MMPI.

The diagnostic efficacy of the MMPI-168 and standard MMPI was compared with a sample of psychiatric inpatients. Using traditional psychiatric measures and projective testing as a basis for the criterion diagnoses, no significant differences were found between the two MMPI forms. Rationale for the methodology employed was discussed.

Journal Article↗

Construction and cross-validation of an MMPI Black-White scale.

A robust set of MMPI items, sensitive to the effect of race (Blacks versus Whites), was constructed by compiling the results of six prior studies. Thirty-two items comprised the MMPI B-W scale. The scale was cross-validated on psychiatric patients and police cadets. Statistically significant mean differences were found between races in both groups, with 83% and 60% correct racial classification, respectively. These findings suggested that when used as a clinical instrument, the MMPI might pick up nonpathology-related racial variance contributing to scale devotion biased against the black respondent, but the degree of nonpathology-related racial scale score covariance has yet to be determined. For future research, the B-W scale was proposed as a set of standard queries in studies assessing connotative meaning for Black-White contrast groups, and to index "functional" as opposed to "objective" race membership.

Journal Article↗

Use of local norms to improve high-point code-type concordance of two short forms of the MMPI.

Criticisms of short forms of the MMPI have been based on claims of unsatisfactory high-point code-type concordance rates. The use of local norms has been suggested as a possible solution for these low concordance rates. In this study local norms for three client populations were developed for the MMPI-168 and Faschingbauer's abbreviated MMPI. These local norms did not significantly increase high-point code-type concordance. Possible explanations for these findings are discussed and suggestions for future research offered.

Journal Article↗

Note on the relationship between nude figure drawings and the MMPI scales.

MMPI protocols of 40 asthmatic patients who produced nude DAPs were compared to a matched control group of equal number, Independent t tests computed for the validity and clinical scales of the MMPI between groups yielded not a single statistically significant difference. In contrast to the importance generally ascribed to global ratings of DAP figures, the global rating of nudity on DAP drawings did not differentiate any aspect of personality as measured by the MMPI.

Journal Article↗

A voice-operated method for administering the MMPI.

Paper/pencil psychological tests such as the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) are difficult to complete independently by patients with limited hand function. This paper describes a voice recognition system developed to allow patients with no hand function to take the MMPI independently. Profiles generated by this system are not statistically different from those generated by standard MMPI booklet format. Limitations and possible extensions of the system as it currently exists are discussed.

Journal Article↗

MMPI Scale Five: its meaning, or lack thereof.

As a widely used test of personality and psychopathology, the MMPI play an important part in making decisions that affect people's lives. The addition of "cookbooks" and, more recently, computer-generated output based on MMPI scale scores provide even the most unsophisticated user with what appear to be credible and valid interpretations of scale and profile variations. A comprehensive review of the literature on MMPI Scale Five (MJ) calls into question generalizations arising from scores on the scale. Empirical research provides no consistent meaning for any score level on the scale. Attempts to map the structure of the scale result in numerous factors and account for, at best, 30% of the variance. Discussion focuses on the shortcomings of the scale as well as the assumptions on which it was developed. Conclusions suggest that the concept of sex difference itself is inappropriately defined and establishes artificial boundaries.

Journal Article↗

Inconsistent responding to repeated MMPI items: is its major cause really carelessness?

Previous authors have recommended using the number of inconsistent responses given to repeated MMPI items as a measure of the carelessness with which an individual has responded to the test. Such a recommendation assumes that a respondent who reads the items carefully must necessarily give an identical response to both presentations of the same item. Contrary to this assumption of a single cause, three potential causes of inconsistency--maladjustment, carelessness, and indecision--were investigated among 202 normal undergraduates who responded to the whole MMPI twice. The results suggest that indecision may be a more important cause of inconsistency than carelessness, thereby calling into question the use of inconsistencies on repeated MMPI items as a "carelessness" scale. Implications regarding the processes involved in responding to personality items are discussed.

Journal Article↗

Assessing the person reliability of an individual MMPI protocol.

This study investigated various measures commonly employed to assess the person reliability of an individual Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPB protocol. Specifically, relationships among indices of person reliability and the standard MMPI validity scales were examined using the responses of 82 subjects who completed the MMPI on two occasions separated by 1 week. Person reliability indices were based on within-occasion responses to identical and to psychologically similar items, and on three across-occasion response consistency measures. The validity scales, namely, the L, F, K, and Cannot Say scales, showed higher test-retest stability than the within-occasion person reliability indices. Further, the validity scales and person reliability indices appeared to reflect multiple facets of dependable responding. Interestingly, an individual's tendency to change responses to MMPI items from the test to the retest was significantly predictable. Clinical implications of these findings were derived.

Journal Article↗

Comparability of computerized adaptive and conventional testing with the MMPI-2.

A computerized adaptive version and the standard version of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) were administered 1 week apart to a sample of 155 college students to assess the comparability of the two versions. The countdown method was used to adaptively administer Scales L, F, the I0 clinical scales, and the 15 new content scales. Profiles across administration modalities show a high degree of similarity, providing evidence for the comparability of computerized adaptive and conventional testing with the MMPI-2. Substantial item savings were found with the adaptive version. Future directions in the study of adaptive testing with the MMPI-2 are discussed.

Journal Article↗

Diagnosing personality disorders: an examination of the MMPI-2 and MCMI-II.

Personality disorders are highly prevalent in clinical populations and affect outcomes across all forms of intervention. This investigation examined the diagnostic efficiency of two widely used, self-report measures of personality disorder (MMPI-2; Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989; MCMI-II; Millon, 1987), as compared to a structured interview (SCID-II; Spitzer et al., 1987) diagnosis. The measures were administered to 150 residential and outpatient volunteer subjects. Persons with primary organic or psychotic-spectrum disorders were excluded from participation. Results were variable across disorders measured, with low to moderate levels of diagnostic agreement observed. The MCMI-II appears to be a more sensitive measure, whereas the MMPI-2 is more specific. The two self-report measures demonstrated greater convergence with each other than with the interview measure. Both the MMPI-2 and MCMI-II were more accurate at identifying the absence of a given disorder. Although overall diagnostic powers exist at acceptable levels. the results suggest that diagnoses generated by self-report versus interview are not interchangeable.

Journal Article↗

Validity of the MMPI subtle items.

This article presents a review and critique of research on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) subtle items in regard to their validity as measures of their scales' characteristics. The main categories of focus are their convergent and discriminative validity, the paradoxical effect, and the issue of whether removing these items would improve MMPI validity. Important problems in the methodologies are noted and discussed in some detail. These methodological concerns and the conflicting results across studies obscure firm conclusions on the validity of the subtle items, although strong support is lacking. However, more evidence is needed before deciding to remove these items from the MMPI; therefore, this article provides recommendations for future research.

Journal Article↗

Comparing three new MMPI-2 randomness indices in a novel procedure for random profile derivation.

This study compared three new validity indices; /F-Fb/, VRIN+/F-Fb/, and F+Fb+/F-Fb/; to the F, back-F, and VRIN according to their effectiveness in detecting degrees of profile randomness. Participants completed the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2; Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, and Kaemmer, 1989) according to standardized instructions. All profiles starting at Items 142, 284, or 426 were substituted with computer-generated random responses to produce 75%, 50%, and 25% random profiles, respectively. Twenty-five profiles were derived using 100% computer-generated items. Finally, one unaltered set of profiles was designated as 0% random. This generated five groups of MMPI-2 profiles, differing according to the degree of profile randomness (i.e., 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%). Results showed that the F and /F-Fb/ indices were unable to distinguish authentic from all degrees of randomness, whereas the F+Fb+F-Fb scale could reliably distinguish all levels of randomness. The actuarial analysis found back-F and F+Fb+/F-Fb/ misclassified the least number of profiles, suggesting the latter index should be included in the evaluation of MMPI-2 profile randomness.

Journal Article↗

Detection of faking on the MMPI-2: differentiation among faking-bad, denial, and claiming extreme virtue.

The purpose of this study was (a) to evaluate the ability of the existing validity indices of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2) in detecting faking. bad and faking-good profiles, (b) to differentiate between two strategies for faking-good (denial and claiming extreme virtue), (c) to determine the effectiveness of the new MMPI-2 validity scale, the S scale, in detecting people's tendency to present themselves in a superlative manner, and (d) to explore the response strategy under conditions in which individuals we known to be distorting their responses to the MMPI-2 Participants were 167 undergraduate, college students who were administered the test under different conditions, and 50 hospitalized, psychiatric patients. Mean profile configurations and optimal cutoff scores obtained in this study were similar to those reported in previous studies. Accurate identification of faked profiles was achieved. The new S scale and its subscales, especially S2 (Serenity), S3 (Contentment With Life), and S5 (Denial of Moral Flaws), showed particular promise in detecting faking-good (denial and claiming extreme virtue) profiles, Participant's debriefing provided valuable information about the participants' understanding of the instructions and their deception strategies. The attempts to differentiate between two strategies for faking-good, denial and claiming extreme virtue, were not successful, However, these results should not be taken to indicate that the particular strategies assessed in this study cannot be differentiated. Methodological issues reviewed suggest that further research might yield more understanding of the nature of any deception efforts made by respondents. In addition, future, research is needed to discover if the findings from this study generalize to other clinical settings and populations.

Journal Article↗

Exploring MMPI-Rorschach relationships.

Limitations exist in the current literature examining Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)-Rorschach interrelationships. In this article I attempt to identify several issues to be addressed by researchers in this area. These include restricting conclusions about MMPI-Rorschach relationships to research using the Comprehensive System; considering the relative reliability and validity of these tests; comparing the predictive power of the Rorschach and MMPI; examining the effects extreme outliers have on statistical analyses; and determining the appropriate level of analysis for research, the level of individual test scores, or psychological constructs. The implications of these issues for research design, statistical analysis, and applied clinical work are discussed.

Journal Article↗