Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “MAMMOGRAPHY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 631 records · Page 35Linked to original sources
PubMed1988

The technology of mammography. Misunderstood and underutilized.

This article reviews milestones in the technological development of mammography since 1970. Mammography is particularly underutilized as a screening procedure for breast cancer and the reasons for its continued inappropriate and under use are explored. Although there are some known barriers to increased utilization among the female adult population, the majority of barriers reside within the domain of referring physicians. Remedies to address the low referral rates for screening mammography are outlined for federal agencies, radiology groups, mammography equipment companies, medical schools, and philanthropic groups. Until the developers of technological procedures such as mammography appreciate that the application of a technology and its appropriate utilization by professionals and the public are important to consider when the technology is developed, utilization rates may not do justice to the technology's potential.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Mammography in New Hampshire: characteristics of the women and the exams they receive.

New Hampshire (NH) is one of two states that has developed a population-based mammography registry. The purpose of this paper is to describe what we have learned about mammography use in New Hampshire. After collecting data for 20 months, the database contains almost 110,000 mammographic encounters representing 101,679 NH women, who range in age from 18 to 97 with a mean of 56.7 years (SD=10.91). Education levels are high with 92% having a high school education and 59% with some college. Forty-six percent report their primary insurance is private, 29% report HMO/PPO coverage, and 25% receive federal health care assistance. Risk factors represented in the database include (categories not mutually exclusive) advancing age (60% over age 50), hormone replacement therapy use by menopausal women (40.6%), and a family history of breast cancer (29%). Penetration of mammography relative to the NH population is higher for younger age groups (40-48% for those aged 44-64) than older age groups (34-39% for those aged 65-84). The majority of mammographic encounters are routine screening exams (86%), often interpreted as negative or normal with benign findings (88%). Use of comparison films to interpret either diagnostic or screening mammography occurred in 86% of encounters. We have matched 3,877 breast pathology records to these mammographic encounters. The distribution of pathology outcomes for diagnostic exams was very similar to that for screening exams (approximately 65% benign, 17% invasive breast cancer, and 6% noninvasive breast cancer). Overall, we have designed a system that is well accepted by the NH community. Challenges include careful monitoring of data for coding errors, and a limitation of linking variables in mammography and pathology data. Data represented in this registry are a critical resource for research in mammographic screening and breast cancer early detection.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

The effect of patient reminders on the use of screening mammography in an urban health department primary care setting.

Mammography screening continues to be under-utilized, especially among women from lower socioeconomic groups. In order to determine whether having direct access to health care services has an effect on mammography use among low income women, we conducted a randomized trial of two alternative letter reminders among 1,717 women who were enrolled at two locations of a multi-site inner city health department in Detroit. All participants were 39(1/2) years of age and older and were due for a screening mammogram at randomization. A physician-directed reminder form was placed in each of the participant's medical records at the beginning of the study. In addition participants were randomized to receive either a letter directing them to visit their primary care physician, a letter directing them to contact the clinic directly to schedule a mammogram, or no letter. Study participants were predominantly African-American, two-thirds of whom were over age 50, and who had minimal health insurance coverage. During the intervention year, mammograms were completed by 179 out of 967 study women at site one (18.5%), and 90 out of 750 study women at site two (12%). A multivariate model controlling for the simultaneous effect of age, insurance type, visit history and past mammography use, showed no significant independent effect of either type of letter reminder on mammography completion during the study year. In conclusion, letters targeted at women due for screening mammograms did not have a beneficial effect on mammography utilization above and beyond that of a physician medical record reminder.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Predictors of adoption of mammography in women under age 50.

Women in the University of North Carolina Alumni Heart Study reported their knowledge of and attitudes toward mammography as well as their adoption of mammography by 1991. Personality measured in 1988-1989 at the age of 42 was associated with the pattern of adoption of mammography reported 2 years later. Adoption of regular mammograms was predicted by conscientiousness, extraversion, and lower depression but not by anxiety. After adjusting for 8 traditional predictors of mammography shown to be significant in this population, the previous personality factors did not maintain their significance. When the women were divided into those who reported breast problems and those who did not, the same set of adjustment factors reduced, but did not eliminate, the association of conscientiousness with adoption of mammography for women without breast problems.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Distress, personality, and mammography utilization among women with a family history of breast cancer.

The authors examined the impact of psychological distress and the personality construct of conscientiousness (as measured by the Neuroticism, Extraversion, and Openness-Five Factor Inventory) on mammography utilization among women who were at increased risk for breast cancer. Participants were 200 women who had at least 1 first degree relative with breast cancer. Overall, 80% of the participants had obtained a mammogram in the previous year. Analyses controlling for potential confounders (perceived risk, decisional balance, and physician recommendation for mammography), revealed that distress was negatively associated with mammography utilization among participants who were low in conscientiousness. Distress was not significantly related to mammography utilization among highly conscientious women. The results are discussed in terms of their implications regarding interventions designed to increase mammography utilization in this population.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Psychosocial variables, external barriers, and stage of mammography adoption.

Guided by H. Triandis's (1980) theory of behavior and the transtheoretical model, the study purpose was to examine differences in psychosocial variables and external conditions by stage of mammography adoption. Sampled from a statewide population, participants (N=509) were women aged 51-80. They had been contacted by telephone, screened for eligibility (e.g., no history of cancer or recent mammogram), and interviewed 3-6 months later. Higher utility beliefs, social influences, and practitioner interactions about mammography were associated with improved stage of adoption, as were lower negative affect and external barriers regarding mammography. Higher decisional balance scores, with and without negative affect toward mammography were associated with improved stage. Controlling for variables reflecting pros and cons, negative affect toward mammography further distinguished among stages. A richer set of pros and cons measures could explain screening more fully.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Microcalcifications of non-palpable breast lesions detected by ultrasonography: correlation with mammography and histopathology.

OBJECTIVES: Microcalcifications are generally not demonstrated well on ultrasonography. In this study, we attempted to demonstrate the usefulness of high-resolution ultrasonography in the detection of microcalcifications associated with non-palpable breast cancers. DESIGN: Fourteen patients with non-palpable breast lesions in whom microcalcifications were detected or suspected by ultrasonography and one patient in whom microcalcifications were detected on mammography only were included in the study. Mammography and analysis of biopsy specimens were performed in each patient and the findings were correlated with the ultrasonographic findings. Ultrasonography and mammography were performed independently by different physicians at different times. RESULTS: In three patients < or = 30 years of age, who were not at high risk of breast cancer and who had no evidence of cancer on palpation, high-resolution ultrasonography clearly showed microcalcifications but no mass. Two of these patients had ductal carcinoma in situ and one had small invasive carcinoma with extensive comedocarcinoma. Among the other 12 patients with non-palpable breast lesions, ultrasonography detected microcalcifications accurately in six and suggested possible microcalcifications in a further four. Microcalcifications in all of these ten patients were confirmed by mammography thereafter. Four of these ten patients had ductal carcinoma in situ, with or without invasive carcinoma. Of the remaining two patients, one demonstrated false-positive findings and one false-negative findings on ultrasound. On high-resolution ultrasonography, microcalcifications produced the appearance of twinkling stars (bright dots in different planes) in a dark sky (contrasted against ill-defined hypoechoic patches), corresponding on histopathology to groups of expanded ducts with increased cell density with or without necrosis. CONCLUSION: High-resolution ultrasonography may be used for detection of microcalcifications in non-palpable breast lesions. Ultrasonography is helpful in screening for early breast cancers, especially in young patients who are at risk for breast cancer and in whom mammography is not usually carried out.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Screening mammography for elderly women.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer is one of the most common and deadly cancers among elderly women, but there is little consensus in the literature about appropriate screening guidelines for the elderly. In this report, evidence-based studies addressing the efficacy and effectiveness of mammography screening programs for elderly women are analyzed and interpreted. OVERVIEW: Although there is little direct scientific evidence to support (or to disavow) the benefits of mammography screening for elderly women, a review of the relevant literature supports the benefits of screening mammography for this population. The authors believe that the current evidence supports the efficacy and effectiveness of mammography screening programs for women up to at least age 80 and also suggests that women older than age 80 who are in good general health will also benefit from screening. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Most individuals rely on their healthcare providers' recommendations to aid them in making decisions regarding their health. When healthcare professionals are equipped with evidence-supported guidelines, they can ensure that appropriate recommendations are being made for their patients. Healthcare professionals who treat the elderly should implement the authors' recommendations, supported by current evidence. The lack of direct evidence should not be interpreted as evidence against the use of screening mammography for the elderly but rather as a call for clinical research on preventive healthcare for senior citizens.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Survival from primary breast cancer after routine clinical use of mammography.

Clinical trials indicate that mammography provides a substantial breast cancer survival benefit; however, there is a need to demonstrate that this benefit extends to clinical practice and to determine the extent that current reductions in mortality are attributable to regular screening or adjuvant systemic therapy. Mammography was used routinely at our institution across a broad age range, in an era when most patients received no adjuvant systemic therapy. We examined breast cancer survival for a cohort of 678 stage I-III primary invasive breast cancer patients accrued from 1971 to 1990, and followed to 1996; 18% received adjuvant hormonal therapy and 15% received adjuvant chemotherapy. There were 61 women less than 40 years old; 136, 40-49 years; 341, 50-69 years; 140, > or =70 years. Factors available for multivariate investigations were age (years), tumor size (cm), nodal status (N-, Nx, N+), ER (fmol/mg protein), PgR (fmol/mg protein), adjuvant radiotherapy (no, yes), adjuvant hormonal therapy (no, yes), and adjuvant chemotherapy (no, yes). Forward stepwise multivariate regression with log-normal survival analysis was used to examine the effects of these factors on disease-specific survival. Ten-year survival by tumor size was adjusted for the effects of other significant factors. For women less than 40 years of age, 10-year survival at the T1a, T1b, T1c, and T2 cut-points for tumor size is, respectively, 0.77, 0.74, 0.67, 0.44; for 40-49 years it is 0.92, 0.90, 0.85, 0.62; for 50-69 years it is 0.81, 0.79, 0.75, 0.62; for > or =70 years it is 0.84, 0.81, 0.73, 0.44. With routine use of clinical mammography and up to 26 years of follow-up, we found breast cancer survival to be significantly better (p< or = 0.05) for all women with smaller tumors and that survival indicated a change in natural disease history with early detection. The Canadian National Breast Screening Study (NBSS) controls had significantly smaller tumors (p < 0.001) than our patients, which may indicate access to mammography outside of the NBSS that reduced the apparent survival benefit for clinical trial mammography.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

A clinic-based mammography intervention targeting inner-city women.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the effect of a clinic-based intervention program on mammography use by inner-city women. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial employing firm system methodology was conducted. SETTING: The study setting was a general internal medicine clinic in the university-affiliated county hospital serving metropolitan Seattle. PARTICIPANTS: Women aged 50 to 74 years with at least one routine clinic appointment (when they were due for mammography) during the study period were enrolled in the trial (n = 314). INTERVENTIONS: The intervention program emphasized nursing involvement and included physician education, provider prompts, use of audiovisual and printed patient education materials, transportation assistance in the form of bus passes, preappointment telephone or postcard reminders, and rescheduling assistance. Control firm women received usual care. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mammography completion within 8 weeks of clinic visits was significantly higher among intervention (49%) than control (22%) firm women (p < .001). These effects persisted after adjustment for potential confounding by age, race, medical insurance coverage, and previous mammography experience at the hospital (odds ratio 3.5; 95% confidence interval 1.9, 6.5). The intervention effect was modified by type of insurance coverage as well as prior mammography history. Process evaluation indicated that bus passes and rescheduling efforts did not contribute to the observed increases in screening participation. CONCLUSIONS: A clinic-based program incorporating physician education, provider prompts, patient education materials, and appointment reminders and emphasizing nursing involvement can facilitate adherence to breast cancer screening guidelines among inner-city women.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Factors affecting participation in a mammography screening program among members of an urban Detroit health maintenance organization.

Breast cancer mortality rates remain disproportionately high among black women despite recent improvements in mammography screening utilization. We conducted a telephone survey among a sample of women (N = 202) participating in a randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of a mammography reminder letter that was one component of a breast cancer control intervention strategy. The objectives of the survey were to ascertain the extent to which the letter reminder was received and acted upon, and to determine attitudes and breast cancer control practices in the target population. The study was conducted among members of a large health maintenance organization serving predominantly black women in Detroit, Michigan. Forty-eight percent of the participants completed a mammogram during the year after the letter was sent. While 72% of the women remembered receiving the letter reminder, only 5% responded to the recommendations in the letter. Important predictors of mammography completion included past mammogram utilization (OR: 2.49; 95% CI: 1.05-5.93), a prior physician recommendation for a mammogram (OR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.00-3.95) and subject's knowledge of her primary physician's name (OR: 2.05; 95% CI: 0.91-4.60). Letter reminders promoting primary care visits were relatively ineffective since few women reported being prompted by the letter recommendation. Strategies which target physician mammography referral behavior may have an important impact on mammography utilization among inner-city women.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Screening mammography: Is it suitably targeted to older women who are most likely to benefit?

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether screening mammography is suitably targeted to older women who are most likely to benefit. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: New Haven County, Connecticut. PARTICIPANTS: Eight hundred forty-four community-dwelling older women were interviewed as part of the 1990 New Haven Established Populations for the Epidemiologic Study of the Elderly (EPESE) program. MEASUREMENTS: Mammography use was ascertained from Medicare Part B claims data. A four-level prognostic mortality index was developed using items previously shown to be predictive of mortality. Mammography use and all-cause mortality were evaluated by prognostic stage over a 5-year period, January 1, 1991, to December 31, 1995. RESULTS: Five-year mortality increased steadily with each prognostic stage (12% to 68%, P = .001), whereas the 5-year mammography use rate declined (48% to 7%, P = .001). Over half the women (53%) in the most favorable prognostic group did not receive a mammogram, whereas 13% in the two worst prognostic groups received at least one mammogram. CONCLUSION: Screening mammography may be underutilized among older women who are the most likely to benefit and overutilized among those who are unlikely to benefit.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2000

[Full-field digital mammography].

Due to the extremely high image quality requirements in mammography, there has for a long time been no adequate digital alternative to conventional film-screen mammography. The longest experience so far exists with digital mammography on the basis of storage phosphor (CR) systems. However, at normal dose this technique has a relatively poor signal-to-noise ratio and has not found general acceptance. Recently three novel systems for digital mammography by the companies Fischer (slot-scan detector), Trex (CCD-array), and GE (amorphous silicon detector) have been introduced and are currently under clinical investigation. The main advantage of digital mammography is the linear relationship between dose and detector signal with the possibility of a tailored optimization of image contrast. Other advantages include digital image storage, telemammography, and computer-assisted diagnosis.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2001

[Malignant and benign diseases of the breast in 41 male patients: mammography, sonography and pathohistological correlations].

AIM: The goal of our study was to evaluate findings in mammography and sonography in male patients with pathohistologically proven diseases of the breast. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Mammographies and sonographies, which were obtained in 41 male patients in a 6-year period, were retrospectively evaluated in accordance with the BI-RADS(R) classification. RESULTS: Histologically 13 carcinomas, 21 gynecomastias, 3 pseudogynecomastias, 2 epithelial inclusion cysts and 2 other benign lesions were diagnosed. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of mammography in differentiation of benign versus malignant disease were 92 %, 89 %, 80 %, 96 % and 90 %, respectively. Additional sonography did not change these results. However, sonography increased diagnostic confidence in 18.2 % (2/11) of suspicious lesions. CONCLUSION: In our study the invasive ductal carcinoma of male patients was a predominantly lobulated, ill-defined lesion in mammography and sonography. The differentiation of carcinoma to pseudogynecomastia and diffuse or dendritic gynecomastia was securely feasible. However, we could not reliably distinguish between carcinoma and some benign mass lesions. In cases of mammographically diagnosed masses or unclear mammography, additional sonography should be performed to increase the diagnostic confidence.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Use of iodine-based contrast media in digital full-field mammography--initial experience.

AIM: To investigate the use of iodine-based contrast media in digital full-field mammography. METHODS: After performing initial phantom studies, seven patients underwent digital mammography (Senographe 2000D, GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, USA) using a specially filtered beam before as well as 60, 120, and 180 seconds after injection of 80 ml of iodine contrast medium (Ultravist 370, Schering AG, Germany). The precontrast mammograms were then subtracted from the postcontrast mammograms and the resulting images compared with a contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI study, performed on all women. RESULTS: Contrast medium accumulation within the tumors was visualized with a good quality in all cases. The conditions under which successful contrast-enhanced digital mammography can be performed were determined in phantom studies. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced digital mammography has a potential for improving the visualization of breast tumors in mammography using special beam filtering, adjusted x-ray parameters, proper timing, and suitable subtraction software.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2006

[Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].

PURPOSE: Calculation of the average glandular dose for mammography on a full-field digital mammography system using a selenium flat-panel detector. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mammographic examinations were carried out using the Selenia digital mammographic system from Lorad/Hologic. 1992 mammographies of 500 patients in cranio-caudal and medio-lateral projections were evaluated. Based on the recorded exposure conditions (tube voltage, tube loading, filtration, compressed breast thickness), the entrance surface air kerma was calculated by multiplying the tube loading by the measured tube output and was corrected according to the inverse square law. The average glandular dose was determined for each exposure by multiplying the entrance surface air kerma value by the relevant conversion factor for a breast composition of 50 % adipose tissue and 50 % glandular tissue by weight. RESULTS: The mean values for patient age and compressed breast thickness were 61 years and 58 mm, respectively. The average glandular dose was 1.57 mGy for a single view (1.46 mGy for cranio-caudal view images and 1.68 mGy for medio-lateral view images). CONCLUSION: Full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector requires a dose similar to that of units with a flat-panel detector based on amorphous silicon and a dose approximately 20 % lower than that of conventional screen/film mammography.

Body Burden↗
PubMed1996

[Ultrasound and mammography follow-up of findings after breast saving operation and adjuvant irradiation].

AIM: The aim of our controlled retrospective study was to assess the diagnostic value of sonography for detection and characterisation of changes compared to mammography and palpation. METHOD: In 80 patients sonographic and clinical follow-up examinations were performed every 3 to 6 months, mammography examinations were performed every 6 to 12 months during the first 2 years after breast-preserving therapy (BPT) and irradiation. Extension, echogenicity, and configuration of lesions in sonography, and semiquantitiative description of diffuse or circumscribed changes in mammography were the basis of comparative follow-up observation. RESULTS: Postoperative seromas and haematomas, initially presenting echo-free or as hypoechoic lesions, showed an increase in echogenicity within 18 months after irradiation. Fat necrosis occurred in 9.5% of patients, lymph cysts developed in 4%, granuloma in 3%, recurrence of neoplasma in 1.6%. The diffuse loss of transparency in mammography that was associated with radiation therapy, showed a peak 6-12 months after irradiation. CONCLUSION: Sonography and sonographic guided puncture are mandatory tools to characterise circumscribed unclear lesions after breast-conserving therapy and irradiation in specialised centers. We recommend a 6-month interval for combined sonography, palpation, and mammography within the first 2 years after BPT and irradiation, because shorter control intervals did not result in relevant diagnostic advantages.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

[Automated mammary sonography and mammography: the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions].

PURPOSE: A prospective study on the differentiation of breast lesions was carried out using experimental combination schemes of mammography and automatic sonography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: X-ray mammograms and a B image from automatic sonography of 39 malignant and 41 benign lesions as well as 40 cases without lesions were separately examined by four experienced diagnosticians. The observers differentiated the findings mammographically and by measurement in the B images. RESULTS: For two examiners the combination of mammography and automatic sonography gave with regard to the differentiation of breast lesions an improvement in sensitivity of 3 or 5% and in specificity of 31 and 18%, respectively, as compared to mammography alone while for the other two examiners an improved specificity of 21 and 36%, respectively, was accompanied by an 8 and 10% decrease in sensitivity as compared to mammography alone. CONCLUSIONS: The differentiating criteria from automatic sonography and mammography can, in principle, be used to evaluate the dignity of breast lesions. However, an optimization is necessary since the improvement in specificity does not compensate the loss in sensitivity.

Adult↗