PubMedDate not supplied
BACKGROUND: Approximately 40% of Hennepin County Medical Center's (HCMC's) ambulance runs are for minor medical conditions as defined by billing criteria ["ALS minor," i.e., no advanced life support (ALS) procedures done in the field]. Current metropolitan guidelines mandate that all such patients must be transported to a hospital unless they refuse this service. It has been proposed that some patients with minor medical conditions could be better served by treatment in the field by paramedics and referred to a clinic or hospital for early follow-up care. It is proposed that this approach would save costs and improve paramedic availability for patients with more serious conditions. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of implementing such a program by identifying high-volume, low-complexity groupings of cases. Such high-volume, low-complexity cases would serve as the topics for curriculum development for paramedic training in field treatment and referral. METHODS: Data were obtained from ambulance run sheets and emergency department (ED) records for all patients transported by the HCMC ambulance service in 1996 who were covered by the Metropolitan Health Plan (MHP) and who were categorized for billing purposes as "ALS minor" transports. The data included demographic information, vital signs, presenting problem, diagnoses in the ED, and procedures, laboratory studies, or x-rays done in the ED. Patients were classified as "potentially treatable" in the field if they were treated and discharged from the ED without undergoing any procedures or diagnostic studies. Patients who required more extensive evaluation in the ED, or who were admitted, were classified as likely too "complex" to be treated at the scene and then referred for early follow-up. The data were analyzed to find the most common presenting problems and the numbers, characteristics, and dispositions of "potentially treatable" and "complex" patients in each group. This information was used to determine what, if any, types of patients could potentially be treated safely and effectively according to this scheme. RESULTS: The study group comprised 1,103 patients, representing 127 different presenting medical problems. There were 523 (47%) "potentially treatable" patients and 580 (53%) "complex" patients. The 127 medical problems were grouped and the 15 most common presenting problem groups were identified. Within these groups there was no single medical problem with high volume. Each of these 15 most common problem groups contained a substantial proportion of "complex" patients, ranging from 24% to 100%. CONCLUSIONS: None of the 15 most frequently encountered problem groups consisted of a high enough proportion of "potentially treatable" cases to serve as a high-volume, low-complexity category for paramedic treatment in the field with early follow-up. Without any identified high-volume, low-complexity categories, a treatment and referral program as proposed in this article would require a substantial investment in development of appropriate criteria and in training paramedics to apply the criteria for numerous clinical entities. This would limit any cost saving, and require great care to avoid compromising patient safety accompanied by substantial professional liability exposure.