Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Estramustine”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 631 records · Page 35Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Combination of LHRH analog with somatostatin analog and dexamethasone versus chemotherapy in hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a randomized phase II study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate prospectively the combination of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog with a somatostatin analog and dexamethasone in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) in a randomized Phase II study. HRPC presents a challenging therapeutic problem. Salvage chemotherapy is the usual approach at this stage of the disease. The combination of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog with a somatostatin analog and dexamethasone has produced objective clinical responses in HRPC. METHODS: Forty patients with HRPC were randomized to receive one of two treatments. Group 1 underwent chemotherapy (estramustine 140 mg three times daily and etoposide 100 mg orally for 21 days) and group 2 the combination of a somatostatin analog (lanreotide 30 mg intramuscularly every 14 days) and dexamethasone (4 mg tapered to 1 mg), in addition to androgen ablation by orchiectomy or a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (triptorelin 3.75 mg intramuscularly every 28 days). The clinical and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, overall survival, time to progression, and toxicity were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The data of 20 patients in group 1 and 18 in group 2 were analyzed. The demographic and clinical data were similar in the two groups at study entry. A PSA response (decrease of greater than 50%) was observed in 45% of group 1 and 44% of group 2. The difference was not statistically significant. A partial clinical response was observed in 29% and 30% of groups 1 and 2, respectively. Again, the difference was not statistically significant. Changes in performance status and pain score during treatment were not significantly different in the two groups. Hematologic toxicity was more frequent in group 1 (80% of patients), and mild diabetes was more frequent in group 2 (22% of patients). The overall survival was 18.8 months in group 1 and 18 months in group 2 (not statistically significant). The time to progression was 6 versus 4 months and, in the PSA responder subgroup, it was 8 versus 7.7 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively (neither difference was statistically significant). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our randomized Phase II study indicated that the new combination treatment (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog, somatostatin analog, and dexamethasone) may be equally effective as salvage chemotherapy in patients with HRPC in terms of the clinical and PSA response, overall survival, and time to progression. A larger prospective Phase III trial is required to confirm our observations.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

The current role of chemotherapy in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Since the publication of the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) 99-16 and TAX 327 studies, which demonstrated a survival benefit for docetaxel-based therapy, clinicians for the first time have a therapy to offer men with metastatic prostate cancer that is not merely palliative in its effects. Phase 2 and phase 3 trials are now building on the findings of SWOG 99-16 and TAX 327 by evaluating the potential of combination taxane-based therapies, such as docetaxel plus high-dose calcitriol, docetaxel-estramustine-bevacizumab, and docetaxel-thalidomide. The optimal timing of docetaxel-based chemotherapy is still unknown, as there are no prospective clinical trial data to indicate whether earlier treatment (eg, at the time of prostate-specific antigen failure) is more or less effective than later treatment (eg, in metastatic and/or symptomatic disease).

Androgen Antagonists↗
PubMed1985

Treatment of prostatic cancer: effects on serum lipoproteins and the cardiovascular system.

We studied 32 patients with prostatic cancer before, and after 1 and 6 months of treatment with orchiectomy, estramustine phosphate or conventional estrogens (polyestradiol phosphate plus ethinyl estradiol). Lipid metabolism was evaluated by lipoprotein analysis and the intravenous fat tolerance test. Effects on the cardiovascular system were studied by exercise electrocardiography, blood volume estimation and thoracic electrical impedance measurement, a sensitive method to detect early signs of fluid retention. Present treatment programs for prostatic cancer seem to result in effects on lipoprotein metabolism that probably are of minor importance for the development of atherosclerotic manifestations. Measurement of thoracic impedance may be of value to detect fluid retention in individual patients.

Aged↗
PubMed1981

Systemic treatment of advanced prostatic cancer: development of a new system for defining response.

The low incidence of measurable or evaluable metastases in patients with prostatic cancer makes evaluation of response difficult. This is particularly true in patients with bone metastases only. With a digital model it is possible to measure quantitatively from the radioisotope bone scan the total area of skeletal involvement by metastatic tumor. Definitions of response in bone have been derived from this model. These response criteria have been compared to response in acid phosphatase determinations and clinical status in a study of 44 patients with advanced prostatic cancer treated with estramustine phosphate. Based on serial quantitative bone scans, serial measurements of acid phosphatase levels and repeat clinical evaluations a system is proposed for defining response to systemic therapy that is applicable to the majority of patients with metastatic prostatic cancer.

Acid Phosphatase↗
PubMed1993

Evaluation of the effect of oral clodronate on skeletal metastases with type 1 collagen metabolites. A controlled trial of the Finnish Prostate Cancer Group.

Clodronate relieves bone pain in patients with skeletal metastases. Since the pain relieving mechanism of clodronate may be associated with the antiosteoclastic activity, we have investigated whether the drug has simultaneous actions on bone resorption and pain. Although osteosclerotic metastases are characteristic of prostate carcinoma, bone resorption is also accelerated. The resorbing process can be investigated using a specific immunoassay for ICTP (cross-linked carboxyterminal telopeptide region of type I collagen) which allows the measurement of the degradation of type I collagen in serum samples. We have also determined serum concentration of PICP (carboxyterminal propeptide of type I procollagen) which reflects the synthesis of type I collagen (osteoid). Patients who have relapsed after first-line hormonal therapy, were randomised to receive estramustine phosphate (E) with or without clodronate (C) (E + C, n = 50; E, n = 49). The dose of E was 560 mg and that of C 3.2 g for the first month, thereafter 1.6 g. We saw elevated ICTP and PICP levels in the majority of the patients. A transient decrease in ICTP values occurred simultaneously with pain relief. The changes were more accentuated in the E + C than in the E group but the difference was not significant. In each group serum phosphate concentration decreased markedly (P = 0.001) whereas the activity of alkaline phosphatase remained increased, both indicating a development of osteomalacia during E therapy. The short-term antiosteoclastic effect of C may be explained by the dose reduction, hyperosteoidosis and osteomalacia which inhibit the binding of C on the crystal surfaces and by the late phase of disease.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2004

Is there a role for chemotherapy in prostate cancer?

There is evidence from randomised-controlled trials that patients with symptomatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer may experience palliative benefit from chemotherapy with mitoxantrone and prednisone. This treatment is well tolerated, even by elderly patients, although the cumulative dose of mitoxantrone is limited by cardiotoxicity. Treatment with docetaxel or paclitaxel, with or without estramustine, appears to convey higher rates of prostate-specific antigen response in phase II trials, but is more toxic. Large phase III trials comparing docetaxel with mitoxantrone have completed accrual. There is no role for chemotherapy in earlier stages of disease except in the context of a well-designed clinical trial.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2002

Chemotherapy for androgen-independent prostate cancer.

While men with metastatic prostate cancer frequently show a good initial response to androgen ablation, few options have been available for progressive hormone-refractory prostate cancer, and survival following chemotherapy has not exceeded 9 to 12 months. The combination of prednisone and mitoxantrone has significant palliative effects on bone pain but does not extend survival. The combination of estramustine phosphate (EMP) with the taxanes paclitaxel or docetaxel produces greater than additive cytotoxicity in vivo, and phase I and II studies of taxane-based therapy demonstrate improved survival in hormone-refractory prostate cancer compared to historical controls. Docetaxel appears to have relatively high activity as a single agent and in combination with EMP. Further studies are needed to clarify the optimum dose of EMP, taking into account potential cardiovascular toxicity. Phase III studies of its combination with docetaxel are in progress.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2002

Cytotoxic treatment of aggressive prostate tumors with or without neuroendocrine elements.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is an association between the presence of neuroendocrine elements in relapsed prostate cancer and sensitivity to estramustine/etoposide and carboplatin or cisplatin. Thirty patients with progressive metastatic castrate prostate cancer were selected on the basis of clinical criteria for treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy. The criteria included a tumor biopsy specimen taken during relapse showing neuroendocrine features based on morphology alone (carcinoid elements, small cell tumor) or by immunohistochemistry (detection of chromogranin A, neuron-specific enolase or synaptophysin). Patients were treated with cis- or carboplatin, estramustine (orally) and etoposide (orally or intravenously). Remission of radiographically visualized lesions, decline of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or death owing to any cause constituted (separately reported) the endpoints. Tumor remission was found in about half of the patients, determined either by changes in measurable lesions or by a 50% decline in serum PSA. Neuroendocrine elements--irrespective of how they were identified--were not predictive of tumor remission or survival. Regression of measurable lesions by > 50% was seen in 4/9 (44%) cases of small cell carcinoma, 6/13 (46%) of poorly differentiated carcinoma, 7/13 (54%) of tumors with one marker immunohistochemically detected and 3/7 (43%) of tumors without any staining. It is concluded that response to chemotherapy was not predicted solely on the basis of the presence or absence of neuroendocrine elements in a relapsed tumor specimen. The results support the use of cytotoxic drugs in the relapsed setting and definitive trials are ongoing to prove any benefit to survival.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Evaluation of combined (177)Lu-DOTA-8-AOC-BBN (7-14)NH(2) GRP receptor-targeted radiotherapy and chemotherapy in PC-3 human prostate tumor cell xenografted SCID mice.

The focus of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic benefit of combined gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) receptor-targeted radiotherapy (TRT) with chemotherapy, using the PC-3 xenograft severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mouse model. (177)Lu-DOTA-8-AOC-BBN(7-14)NH(2) is a radiotherapeutic peptide that specifically targets the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor overexpressed on primary and metastatic prostate cancer. The chemotherapeutic agents, docetaxel and estramustine, were administered as single agents or in combination with the receptor-targeted radiotherapeutic agent. Combination receptor TRT/chemotherapy studies were begun 21 days postxenografting and were conducted as multiple-dose trials. The GRP receptor TRT agent was administered every 14 days, and single and combination chemotherapy dose regimens were given weekly. Tumor size, body weight, and body condition score were evaluated twice-weekly and a hematology profile once-weekly. Therapy study tumor volumes were evaluated by way of a repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Tumor volume measurements at 12 days postdose administration demonstrated a statistically significant (two-tailed P-value <0.05) tumor growth suppression in all experimental groups receiving GRP receptor-targeted radiotherapy, when compared to the control group. The two combined GRP receptor TRT/chemotherapy treatment groups demonstrated the greatest tumor growth suppression of all treatment groups. In comparing the two combined GRP receptor TRT/chemotherapy groups to the GRP receptor TRT alone group, a statistically significant difference was demonstrated for the combined groups by day 30, postdose administration. These data demonstrate that GRP receptor-targeted radiation therapy, using (177)Lu-DOTA-8-AOC-BBN(7-14)NH(2), used either alone or in combination with conventional chemotherapy, can suppress the growth of androgen- independent prostate cancer (AIPC).

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Sequential mitoxantrone/prednisone followed by docetaxel/estramustine in patients with hormone refractory metastatic prostate cancer: results of a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Mitoxantrone/prednisone ameliorates symptoms in hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) but has no effect on survival. Docetaxel (Taxotere)/estramustine improves response but with significant toxicity. We reasoned that a sequential administration of the two regimens could be a viable alternative for delivering full doses of chemotherapy, avoiding overlapping toxicity and preserving dose intensity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty HRPC patients were treated with mitoxantrone 10 mg/m(2), day 1, every 3 weeks, plus prednisone 5 mg twice daily, for three cycles, followed by estramustine phosphate, 280 mg three times daily, days 1 to 5, plus docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), day 2, every 3 weeks for a maximum of 10 cycles. RESULTS: All patients were assessable for response and toxicity. After mitoxantrone/prednisone treatment, the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate was 23%, which increased to 63% after completion of sequential mitoxantrone/prednisone and docetaxel/estramustine treatment (12 partial and 7 complete responses). With a median follow-up of 18 months, median survival for all patients was 18 months, and median progression-free survival was 10 months. The mitoxantrone/prednisone regimen was well tolerated, and the only grade 3-4 toxicity was grade 3 neutropenia in four (13%) patients. Twenty-nine patients received a total of 173 cycles of docetaxel/estramustine (median, 6 cycles/patient). Six (20%) patients had grade 3-4 neutropenia and two (6%) patients had febrile neutropenia episodes. The most frequent non-hematological toxic effects were asthenia, nausea and vomiting, edemas and onycholysis. Two (6%) patients had deep venous thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Mitoxantrone/prednisone followed by docetaxel/estramustine is a well-tolerated and active regimen in HRPC. Sequential therapy is feasible and can be used to integrate novel, more active regimens.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy decreases the number of positive surgical margins in stage T2 prostate cancer: interim results of a prospective randomized trial. The Belgian Uro-Oncological Study Group.

PURPOSE: We investigated the effect of neoadjuvant treatment before radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 130 patients with stages T2b and T3 prostate cancer was randomized in a multicenter study: 62 underwent immediate radical prostatectomy and 65 received 560 mg. estramustine phosphate daily for 6 weeks preoperatively. RESULTS: For clinical stage T2b tumors the neoadjuvant treatment resulted in a significant decrease in positive surgical margins compared to the nonpretreated group. This difference was not found for clinical stage T3 tumors. The impact on progression and survival still must be analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant treatment can be beneficial for clinical stage T2 prostate cancer. Optimal treatment for stage T3 tumors remains controversial.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Synergistic inhibitory effect of high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with chemotherapy on Dunning adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic effect of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) combined with chemotherapy (paclitaxel + estramustine) on AT2 Dunning adenocarcinoma, as no satisfactory treatment for localized prostate cancer is available for patients with a poor prognosis, e.g. stage T3, a high Gleason score, or a prostate-specific antigen level of >15 ng/mL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one Dunning AT2 tumour-bearing Copenhagen rats were divided into four groups, i.e. control, chemotherapy, HIFU, and chemotherapy + HIFU (the last three treated for 1 week). The growth in tumour volume was recorded for 3 weeks, the point at which tumour volume was considered to have doubled (doubling time). The growth curves of each group were plotted and evaluated statistically. RESULTS: At 30 days of follow-up the distributions of tumour volume with treatment group were significantly different (P < 0.001); volumes were significantly greater in the control than in the chemotherapy-only or in the HIFU-only group (both P = 0.006). The greatest difference was between the chemotherapy + HIFU and the control group. The tumour doubling times were 13.2 days for HIFU-only, 31.2 days for chemotherapy + HIFU and 7.7 days for the controls. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that this combined therapy could be useful for treating patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1989

Association of acetylated microtubules, vimentin intermediate filaments, and MAP 2 during early neural differentiation in EC cell culture.

Pluripotent P19 embryonal carcinoma cell cultures can be induced to differentiate into neurons and glial cells by the addition of 10(-6) M retinoic acid. During early neural differentiation, a bundle of colchicine-stable, acetylated microtubules is formed. This acetylated microtubule array apparently extends to form neurites during neurogenesis. In this paper, we analyze changes in vimentin and MAP 2 distributions during neural differentiation with respect to the changes in the acetylated microtubule array. During a brief period early in differentiation, indirect immunofluorescence staining shows the colocalization of colchicine-stable acetylated microtubules, vimentin, and MAP 2. Using acrylamide to disrupt the organization of vimentin intermediate filaments and estramustine to disrupt the binding of MAP 2 to microtubules, we show that acetylated microtubules, MAP 2, and vimentin intermediate filaments are arranged in an interdependent cytoskeletal array. We suggest this array may serve to stabilize processes in neural stem cells, before the final decision to differentiate into neurons or glia is made.

Acetylation↗
PubMed1991

Effect of endocrine therapy on a brain metastatic lesion of prostatic carcinoma.

We describe a 62-year-old male with brain metastasis from prostatic carcinoma, which regressed with medical and surgical endocrine therapies. The patient's presenting complaints were left periocular and deep ocular pain and a defect of the left visual field. During treatment of the above symptoms, macrohematuria, dysuria and pollakiuria occurred. Pathological examination of a transrectal needle biopsy disclosed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Computerized tomographic scan (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a brain tumor at the frontal skull base and the region of the frontal lobe suspected to be a metastasis of the prostatic carcinoma. One week after a period of daily administration of estramustine phosphate sodium, the prostate was observed to be softened and slightly decreased in size. The visual field defect and disturbance of urination gradually improved. The prostate decreased to normal size and no tumor mass could be detected on the brain CT after 3 months of treatment.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1994

Reduction of serum prostate-specific antigen during endocrine or cytotoxic treatment of hormone-resistant cancer of the prostate. A preliminary report.

During the years 1988-1991 sequential serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) determinations were performed during systemic treatment of hormone-resistant prostate cancer. The following drugs were used: prednisone (5 mg 4 times per os daily, 8 patients); flutamide (250 mg 3 times per os daily, 13 patients); estramustine phosphate (280 mg 2-3 times per os daily, 12 patients), and epirubicin (100 mg/m2 i.v. every 3rd week, 18 patients). In 3, 3, 4 and 6 patients, respectively, a PSA reduction of > or = 50% was observed during treatment, which in 12 patients was combined with pain relief and improvement in the performance status. Though the exact mechanism of PSA reduction and its clinical significance are not completely understood, the findings suggest that hormone-resistant prostate cancer still contains hormone-sensitive tumor cells. The 4 drugs used in this study seem to be equally effective in achieving a PSA reduction of > or = 50%.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Treatment options in hormone-refractory metastatic prostate carcinoma.

Prostate cancer represents one of the most important health problems in industrialized countries. It is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Therapeutic options are different according to the stage of the disease at the diagnosis. Patients with localized disease may be treated with surgery or radiation, whereas the treatment for patients with a metastatic disease is purely palliative. Hormonal treatment represents the standard therapy for stage IV prostate cancer, but patients ultimately become unresponsive to androgen ablation and are classified as hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients. The molecular mechanisms involved in progression in hormone resistance are characterized by mutations, down and up-regulation in the androgen receptor gene, mutations in p53 and over-expression of Bcl2 and other alterations in genes and in gene expression. The important thing is that we understand these mechanisms to define potential therapeutic agents for the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients. Conventional options for patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer include secondary hormone therapy, radiotherapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy. The commonest antineoplastic agents are mitoxantrone, estramustine and taxanes. Despite an improvement in the palliative benefit, none of these agents has demonstrated a beneficial impact on the overall survival of patients. Therefore, there is no standard therapy for these patients, thus we need new approaches which should be studied in clinical trials. The evaluation and incorporation of new agents into current treatment regimens could have a role in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer, but their efficacy has not yet been demonstrated.

Androgen Antagonists↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Efficacy of total androgen blockade in metastatic prostatic carcinoma with transient hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: a case report.

A patient affected by metastatic prostatic carcinoma and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) was treated with flutamide 750 mg/day plus an LH-RH analog. After confirmation of basal castration during treatment, he continued with antiandrogens alone. Following the normalization of gonadic function and subjective mild bone flare-up, the patient resumed the initial treatment and obtained a partial response. When flutamide was interrupted because of liver toxicity, the patient showed progressive disease in the bone, which was unresponsive to both flutamide resumption and salvage hormone therapy (bicalutamide). The patient is currently receiving chemotherapy with VP16 and estramustine phosphate and is showing both serologic (PSA) and symptomatic response. The interest of this case lies in the incidental detection of HH during therapy and in the responsiveness to treatment.

Androgen Antagonists↗
PubMed1998

Change in serum prostate-specific antigen as a marker of response to cytotoxic therapy for hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been used as a marker of advanced prostate cancer but remains controversial. To evaluate PSA as a predictor of survival, we analyzed data from sequential phase II trials of estramustine and etoposide. METHODS: A landmark analysis that used data from 62 men with PSA levels at baseline and 8 weeks was conducted. The best PSA measure (of six evaluated) was incorporated into a multiple regression model with performance status (PS); relative change in PSA level; and pretreatment PSA, alkaline phosphatase, and hemoglobin values. RESULTS: A decrease in PSA of 50% or greater at 8 weeks was associated with a significantly increased survival (P=.0005, two-sided log-rank test). Median survival from the landmark was 91 weeks in patients with a 50% or greater decrease at 8 weeks versus 38 weeks in those without this decrease. Modeling showed that PS, pretreatment hemoglobin level, and relative change in PSA level were significant prognostic factors, with a significant interaction between PS and pretreatment hemoglobin level. In the final model, a relative change in PSA level at 8 weeks of less than 50% had an adjusted relative risk of 2.20 (95% confidence interval, 1.21 to 4.00). A decrease in PSA level of 50% or greater at any time during therapy was associated with a response in measurable disease (P=.0369, two-sided Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSION: The PSA value after 8 weeks of this cytotoxic regimen does predict survival. A decrease in PSA level is associated with both survival and response in soft tissue lesions and should be incorporated into the response criteria and reporting of trials of cytotoxic agents in prostate cancer.

Aged↗