Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Ear Protective Devices”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 631 records · Page 35Linked to original sources

In-flight measures of stress reduction due to wearing expandable foam earplugs.

Ten low-time pilots (less than 150 h) who did not normally use earplugs flew three flights each in Cessna-152 training planes. The flight routines were all the same, lasting about 45 minutes. Each pilot flew one flight while adapting to earplugs, another flight with earplugs, and a third flight without earplugs. Pilot's breathing rate was the measure of autonomic arousal. A baseline rate was measured before each flight and in-flight scores were expressed as changes from baseline. Half the pilots flew their flights in the order, with-with-without earplugs and half flew in the order without-with-with. Results showed a mean increase in breathing rate above preflight baseline of 30% without earplugs and an increase of only 21% with earplugs (data taken from second flight with earplugs) for a significant savings of 9% (p less than 0.025, Wilcoxsen matched-pairs signed-ranks test, one tailed).

Aerospace Medicine↗

The effect of ear protectors on word discrimination in subject with normal hearing and subjects with noise-induced hearing loss.

Two groups of subjects with normal hearing and three groups of subjects with noise-induced hearing loss were studied for the effect of ear protectors on word discrimination in two different speech-to-noise ratios. Various interactions in the analyses of variance were shown to be significant. The important demonstration in this study is that at high speech intensity, subjects with normal hearing should obtain higher word discrimination score with ear protectors than without if the signal-to-noise ratio is high. Albeit, the same is not true for a low signal-to-noise ratio, for a low speech intensity, or when subjects have hearing losses; the improvements in these conditions are not high enough to warrant the disuse of ear protectors. Results are discussed and compared with other studies.

Ear Protective Devices↗

Hearing in military personnel.

Impaired hearing is an occupational hazard prevalent not only in industry but also in the armed forces. A survey to establish its prevalence in the SAF land forces was conducted. A sample of 2,564 subjects obtained through multistage proportional sampling was studied of whom 1,521 "normal" subjects were finally analysed. 403 subjects i.e. 26.5%, showed evidence of impaired hearing. The highest incidence was in the Artillery. The frequency most commonly affected was 6,000 Hz and the commonest presenting symptom was tinnitus. A Hearing Conservation Programme is described. Comparisons with the situations in Singapore's industries are made.

Ear Protective Devices↗

Basic medical implications of scuba diving.

The rapid growth of scuba diving as a sport and the vast expansion of underwater exploration for energy has made it necessary for all physicians to become familiar with diving emergencies. The basic principles of scuba diving and related clinical implications are outlined to provide a more meaningful understanding of problems which may affect a diver.

Air Pressure↗