Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Contraceptive Usage”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 631 records · Page 35Linked to original sources
PubMed1991

Pooled analysis of 3 European case-control studies of epithelial ovarian cancer: III. Oral contraceptive use.

The relationship between use of oral contraceptives (OCs) and other contraceptive methods and the risk of ovarian cancer was examined in a combined analysis of 3 hospital-based case-control studies conducted in Italy, the United Kingdom, and Greece, for a total of 971 ovarian cancer cases and 2,258 controls under age 65. Compared with never-users, the combined multivariate relative risk (RR) for ever-users was 0.6 (95% confidence interval, CI = 0.4-0.8) and the estimates were consistent in the 3 datasets. The protection was also similar across strata of age and parity. Considering various measures of OC use, available in the Italian and British datasets only, the protection conveyed on ovarian cancer risk increased with the duration of use and persisted in the medium-long period: the RR in women reporting their last OC use greater than or equal to 15 years prior to diagnosis was 0.5 (95% CI = 0.2-1.0). The risks in ever-users were appreciably lower in those women who reported their first OC use before 25 years of age (RR = 0.3 for first use before age 25, 0.8 for first use at age 25-34 and 0.7 at 35 years or after). Such findings emerged similarly from Italian and British data. This combined analysis, besides offering further quantitative estimates of the protective effects of OCs on ovarian cancer risk in European populations, provides useful insights into the time pattern of the relationship between OC use and ovarian carcinogenesis, suggesting that the protection persists for 15 years or more after cessation of use and may be larger for use at younger age.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Use of levonorgestrel implants versus oral contraceptives in adolescence: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: We compared continuation rates, effectiveness, satisfaction with method, side effects, and condom practices among adolescents using levonorgestrel implants (Norplant, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Philadelphia) as compared with oral contraceptives. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a case-control study comparing 94 adolescents < or = 18 years old who received Norplant between March 1, 1992, and Nov. 1, 1993 (cases), with 94 age-matched controls who selected oral contraceptives during this same time period. By use of a structured questionnaire, information was obtained on pregnancy status, duration of use, patient satisfaction, side effects, and condom practices 6 months after initiation. Objective measures included weight on Norplant and oral contraceptive users and hematocrit on implant patients. RESULTS: Forty (43%) oral contraceptive patients compared with no Norplant patients discontinued their selected method before the 6-month interview (p = 0.00). Six patients prescribed oral contraceptives became pregnant. Ninety-three percent of Norplant users expressed overall satisfaction despite experiencing menstrual irregularity and cramping, amenorrhea, nervousness, abnormal hair growth or loss, rashes, and an increase in appetite more often than oral contraceptive users. Although Norplant patients also reported an increase in the duration of menstrual flow and number of days of spotting more often than oral contraceptive users, evaluation of hematocrits in these patients demonstrated a significant increase over the 6-month period (p = 0.00). Assessment of condom practices since initiation demonstrated that Norplant patients used condoms less often than oral contraceptive users (p = 0.00). CONCLUSION: Use of levonorgestrel implants may cause more side effects than oral contraceptives in the early months after initiation but provide superior protection against unintended pregnancy. We concluded that Norplant is a reasonable alternative for adolescents, especially when compliance is an issue.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1981

Response of unmarried adolescents to contraceptive advice and service in Nigeria.

The responses of a group of all unmarried, sexually active teenagers in a developing country to offers of contraceptive service were assessed in a prospective, 30-month study at a teaching hospital family planning center. Teenagers of this group constituted 7.2% of the clinic population. The default rate was very high (43.0%) and was most noticeable among users of oral contraceptives. The intrauterine device seemed more acceptable, as were injections of norethisterone enanthate. Possible reasons for this pattern of response are given, and the authors suggest giving new consideration to making the intrauterine device more suitable for and acceptable to teenagers of developing countries. The place of norethisterone enanthate in teenage contraception is also discussed.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Impact of contraception on gynecologic cancers.

In considering the appropriate contraceptive method for a particular woman, the potential effect of that method on her risk of developing cancer of the breast, cervix, endometrium, or ovary is crucial. Among the most closely studied of the risk factors for gynecologic neoplasm has been the potential role of contraceptives, especially oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, and injectable progestins. Physicians need to consider the potential impact of these agents on the disease process, therapy for the disease, future fertility, and the health of the fetus. Although much of the epidemiologic data is inconsistent and difficult to interpret, most studies find no association between oral contraceptive use and increased risk of breast cancer, except possibly in younger women (< 45 years of age) with prolonged use. Oral contraceptive use may also protect against benign breast disease. Data concerning oral contraceptive use and cervical neoplasm are confounded by several interacting variables, the most important of which is that oral contraceptive users tend to have more Papanicolaou smears than nonusers. Some studies have indicated an increased risk of two- to fourfold after 10 years of use. Oral contraceptive use provides clear protection against endometrial and ovarian cancer, an effect that persists for years after discontinuation. Less data have been collected regarding the relationship between intrauterine devices and injectable hormonal preparations and various types of cancer. No evidence suggests that the intrauterine device predisposes to the development of preneoplastic conditions of the cervix, nor to endometrial or ovarian cancer. A reliable form of contraception is indicated in women with cancer of any kind that may require chemotherapy or radiation, because these treatments can have adverse effects on the fetus, especially if given during the first trimester.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1987

A clinical trial of Neo Sampoon vaginal tablets and Emko foam in Alexandria, Egypt.

Results are reported for a comparative 12-month study of Neo Sampoon foaming vaginal tablets containing 60 mg of the spermicide, menfegol, and Emko vaginal foam containing an 8.0% concentration of the spermicide, nonoxynol-9. Conducted in cooperation with the Family Planning Association in Alexandria, Egypt, the trial included 349 women who were randomly allocated to use one of the two contraceptive products. The twelve-month cumulative life-table rate for accidental pregnancy (per 100 women) was 2.8 for Neo Sampoon tablet users and 2.1 for Emko foam users. The 12-month continuation rates were 77.6 and 77.2 per 100 women for the tablet and foam groups, respectively. In both groups, the majority of discontinuations from the study were for personal reasons, including lack of confidence in the method, messiness, partner's objection and a burning sensation. Few women reported a product-related complaint while using their assigned contraceptive method. The most commonly reported complaint for both methods was that use of the product led to an uncomfortable burning sensation for the woman and/or her partner. This complaint, however, was cited by less than 5% of the women in each group. Thus, a combination of low pregnancy rates, few complications and complaints and high continuation rates confirm the relative acceptability, effectiveness and short-term safety of these methods of contraception among this sample of Egyptian women.

Administration, Intravaginal↗
PubMed1999

Comparison of efficacy, cycle control, and tolerability of two low-dose oral contraceptives in a multicenter clinical study.

This study compares the contraceptive reliability, cycle control, and tolerability of two oral contraceptive preparations containing 20 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol combined with either 75 micrograms of gestodene (EE/GSD) or 150 micrograms of desogestrel (EE/DSG). Women received the trial preparations daily for 21 days, followed by a 7-day pill-free interval. Contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, and tolerability were evaluated over a period of 12 cycles. Efficacy data of 14,700 treatment cycles (EE/GSD: 7299; EE/DSG: 7401) were obtained from 1476 women (EE/GSD, n = 740; EE/DSG, n = 736). Both preparations provided effective contraception and good cycle control with a similarly low incidence of both spotting and breakthrough bleeding. The spotting rates in both treatment groups decreased from 35.1% (EE/GSD) and 37.5% (EE/DSG) in the first treatment cycle to approximately 10% in the fourth treatment cycle. The spotting incidence as percent of the total number of cycles was 12.7% for EE/GSD and 14.3% for EE/DSG. The breakthrough bleeding incidence was 5.2% of all cycles for EE/GSD and 6.0% of all cycles for EE/DSG. For 84.7% of the cycles in the gestodene group and for 82.5% of the cycles in the desogestrel group, neither spotting nor breakthrough bleeding were recorded. Overall, the spotting and breakthrough bleeding incidence tended to be lower with EE/GSD than with EE/DSG. However, the difference was not statistically significant. Amenorrhea was recorded in 2.7% of the cycles with EE/GSD and in 2.9% with EE/DSG. Both preparations were well tolerated and showed a similar pattern of adverse events. More than 83% of the women in both groups either did not gain weight or lost more than 2 kg. Both preparations had a beneficial effect on dysmenorrhea. Both regimens provided reliable contraception and good cycle control. The incidence of adverse events was relatively low and both preparations were well tolerated.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1983

Oral contraceptives and breast cancer: final report of an epidemiological study.

During 1968-1980, 1176 women aged 16-50 years with newly diagnosed breast cancer and a like number of matched controls were interviewed at 9 teaching hospitals in London and Oxford and asked about their use of oral contraceptives. The results were reassuring. A few statistically significant differences in oral contraceptive use were found between the breast cancer and control groups, but the data were subdivided in many ways so that some "significant" differences would have been expected through the play of chance alone. Certainly no patterns of risk emerged which would suggest that any of the associations were causal. It must be stressed, however, that the data are still sparse in some important subcategories--for example, only small numbers of both cases and controls had prolonged oral contraceptive use before their first term pregnancy. For this reason, it is important that information on the possible relationship between pill use and breast cancer should continue to be collected. Women who had never used oral contraceptives presented with appreciably more advanced tumours than those who had been using oral contraceptives during the year before detection of cancer, while past users were in an intermediate position. These differences in staging were reflected in the pattern of survival. Possible explanations for these observations include "surveillance bias" among oral contraceptive users leading to earlier diagnosis and a beneficial biological effect of oral contraceptives on tumour growth and spread. Women with breast cancer reported never having used any method of contraception and heavy cigarette smoking (greater than or equal to 15 per day) significantly less often than controls. We could find no obvious explanation for the former observation, but suspect that the latter reflects the unrepresentative smoking habits of our hospital controls rather than a protective effect of smoking against breast cancer.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

The interaction of phenytoin and carbamazepine with combined oral contraceptive steroids.

Patients taking oral contraceptive steroids (OCS) are known to suffer contraceptive failure while taking anticonvulsants such as phenobarbitone, phenytoin and carbamazepine. We have studied the single dose kinetics of ethinyloestradiol (EE2); 50 micrograms, and levonorgestrel (Ng); 250 micrograms in groups of women before and 8-12 weeks after starting therapy with phenytoin (n = 6) and carbamazepine (n = 4). The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was measured over a 24 h period for each steroid and significant reductions were seen with both anticonvulsants. Phenytoin reduced the AUC for EE2 from 806 +/- 50 (mean +/- s.d.) to 411 +/- 132 pg ml-1 h (P less than 0.05) and for Ng from 33.6 +/- 7.8 to 19.5 +/- 3.8 ng ml-1 h (P less than 0.05). Carbamazepine reduced the AUC for EE2 from 1163 +/- 466 to 672 +/- 211 pg ml-1 h (P less than 0.05) and for Ng from 22.9 +/- 9.4 to 13.8 +/- 5.8 ng ml-1 h (P less than 0.05). These changes are compatible with the known enzyme inducing effects of phenytoin and carbamazepine. Patients taking these anticonvulsants will need to be given increased doses of OCS (equivalent to 50-100 micrograms EE2 daily) to achieve adequate contraceptive effects.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

A longitudinal study of back pain and radiological changes in the lumbar spines of middle aged women. I. Clinical findings.

The natural history of low back pain was evaluated over a nine year period in two groups of middle aged Dutch women selected from the general population. One group had recurrent back pain (n = 236) and the other group had never experienced back pain (n = 241). At the onset of the study recurrent back pain was associated with smoking, previous use of the 'pill', pain in other joints, frequent headaches, and restricted lumbar spine movement. Nine years later 170 (72%) of the group with back pain had continuing pain and 58 (24%) of the group without previous back pain had incident pain. Pain in other joints, especially the hip and knee, was a predictor of continuing and incident pain but age, body mass index, and smoking were not.

Back Pain↗
PubMed1992

Existence of multiple peaks in plasma ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone after oral administration of a contraceptive pill.

Previous measurements of plasma ethinyl estradiol (EE2) and norethindrone (NE) over 24 h after oral administration of a contraceptive pill have demonstrated a single steroid peak occurring 1-2 h after pill ingestion, with a gradual decline over the next 22 h. In the present study plasma concentrations of EE2 and NE were measured 0, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 12, and 24 h after oral ingestion of a contraceptive pill containing 35 micrograms EE2 and 1 mg NE at 0, 3, 6, and 9 months of use in 58 normal healthy women. Contrary to previous reports, analysis of the 464 steroid curves (58 subjects x 4 time periods x 2 steroids) revealed the presence of multiple hormone peaks. Two peaks of EE2 were identified in 44.8% of women during the first pill cycle and in 75.9%, 55.2%, and 67.2% of women after 3, 6, and 9 months of pill use. Two hormone peaks of NE were observed in 29.3% of women during the first cycle and in 36.2%, 50%, and 44.8% at 3, 6, and 9 months, respectively. Existence of these multiple peaks at the frequency observed has not previously been reported. Further quantification of the frequency and magnitude of these peaks could be helpful in explaining differences in biological responses associated with pill use.

Adult↗