Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “CHOLECYSTECTOMY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 631 records · Page 35Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Immediate laparoscopic cholecystectomy as definitive therapy for acute cholecystitis.

The objective of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of immediate laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of acute calculous cholecystitis. A prospective data collection was performed on all patients admitted to one surgical service over a 2-year period. The patients were managed by a uniform protocol consisting of (1) preoperative ERCP when common duct stones were suspected; (2) operation within 24 h of diagnosis; and (3) selective operative cholangiography. Previous surgery was not a contraindication to inclusion. The setting was an urban teaching hospital. There were 52 patients, 34 females and 18 males. Nineteen had undergone previous abdominal surgery. Five patients had preoperative ERCP and five had intraoperative cholangiography. The patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy 0.8 +/- 0.4 days postadmission. Four (7.7%) were converted to open cholecystectomy. Fifty-eight percent had spillage of bile and/or stones. Patients went home 2.3 +/- 1.6 days postoperatively. There were no deaths and two complications: a subhepatic biloma and a superficial wound infection. Follow-up of all patients has revealed no late complications. We conclude: (1) Immediate laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and effective for acute cholecystitis even when complicated by previous surgery, inflammatory adhesions, and gangrene. (2) Intraoperative spillage of bile and stones does not lead to an increase in early complications. (3) Cholangiography is needed only when clinically indicated. (4) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be the treatment of choice for patients admitted for acute cholecystitis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a community setting, N = 762.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) can be introduced into a community with morbidity and mortality rates equal to that of open cholecystectomy. The entire general surgical community of Greensboro, NC, learned the technique of LC on animal models prior to offering this innovation to the community. Over the ensuing 12 months, they served as surgeons or assistant surgeons to each other on 762 LCs with morbidity and mortality rates comparable to open cholecystectomy. This retrospective study examined the first 1 year of experience beginning 8/13/90. This work represents all of the LCs performed in Greensboro, and all of the surgeons participated in this review. All of the surgeries were done with an electrocautery and utilized a 0 degree forward-viewing scope. Cases were performed at two hospitals with a surgeon as both operator and assistant, and no effort was made to exclude high-risk or elderly patients from this procedure. Patients averaged 50 years of age and ranged from 14 to 96 years. Static cholangiograms were performed in 27% of patients. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was seen in 4.8%. There were two cardiac deaths (0.26%) and significant complications were seen in 3.4%. Seven patients required reoperations. There were no major common bile duct injuries. This retrospective review indicates that this new procedure can be introduced into a community setting by novice laparoscopic surgeons acting both as operators and assistant with a morbidity and mortality rate comparable to that reported for open cholecystectomy.

Cholangiography↗
PubMed1992

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the anaesthetist's point of view.

Although the surgical advantages of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) have been reported, the anaesthetic problems associated with this new technique have not been well described. For the first 101 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at our institution, we prospectively documented intraoperative critical observations and adverse outcomes in the PACU (Post-Anaesthetic Care Unit). In order to put the magnitude of these problems into perspective, we compared, in an identical manner, the anaesthetic management and outcomes of two more familiar surgical groups, cholecystectomy by laparotomy (C), and laparoscopy for gynaecological examination (LG). For this new procedure LC, intraoperative hypotension (12.9%), and PACU hypothermia (31.4%), nausea and vomiting (12.9%) and desaturation (10.9%) were common but excessive pain (4.0%) was rare. Patients undergoing C, who were older and less healthy, tended to have fewer incidents of OR hypotension (3.4%) but in the PACU experienced more desaturation (25.9%) and excessive pain (12.9%) (P < or = 0.05). The younger and healthier LG group had fewer problems, less OR hypotension (0.4%), and less PACU nausea and vomiting (5.7%) and desaturation (1.3%) (P < or = 0.05). However, the LG group had a similar incidence of excessive pain (4.4%). We have documented considerable postoperative anaesthetic benefits for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with conventional cholecystectomy. However, there is still considerable perioperative morbidity compared with gynaecological laparoscopies. Now that specific problems have been identified, they may be amenable to specific anaesthetic interventions.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2006

Risk factors for conversion to open surgery in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard treatment for most gallbladder diseases. Conversion to open cholecystectomy is necessary in some patients for any of a number of factors. Identifying these factors will help the patient, the surgeon, and the hospital. METHODS: One thousand laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed from May 1998 to May 2004 in Changi General Hospital, Singapore; 103 patients (10.3%) required conversion to open cholecystectomy. All data were kept prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The patients who had conversion were mostly men (P < 0.0001), were heavier (P < 0.05), had acute cholecystitis (P < 0.0001), and had a history of upper abdominal surgery (P < 0.001). There were no differences in terms of race (P = 0.315) and presence of diabetes mellitus (P = 0.126). Diabetic patients who had conversion had a significantly higher glycosylated hemoglobin (Hba1c) (8.9% +/- 0.6%; P < 0.038). Patients who had conversion had a higher total white count (P < 0.05), but liver function tests were similar between the two groups. There was a higher conversion rate among the junior surgeons than the more experience surgeons (P < 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: The significant risk factors for conversion were male gender, advanced age (> 60 years), higher body weight > 65 kg, acute cholecystitis, previous upper abdominal surgery, junior surgeons, and diabetes associated with Hba1c > 6. Chronic liver disease was not found to be a risk factor (P = 0.345), and performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients is safe. Identifying risk factors will help the surgeon to plan and counsel the patient and introduce new policies to the unit. Some of the risk factors are similar to those reported from international centers, but others may be unique to our department.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Pulmonary function after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparotomy causes a significant reduction of pulmonary function, and atelectasis and pneumonia occur after open cholecystectomy. In this prospective, randomized study, we evaluated the hypothesis that pulmonary function is less restricted after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) than after open cholecystectomy (OC). METHODS: Sixty patients underwent laparoscopic (n = 30) or open (n = 30) cholecystectomy. The two groups did not differ significantly in age, sex, intraoperative findings, and preoperative pulmonary function. Pulmonary function tests, arterial blood-gas analysis, and chest radiographs were obtained in both groups before operation and on postoperative day 1. RESULTS: The forced expiratory volume in 1 s (mean +/- SD values; OC, 1.49 +/- 0.77 L/s; LC, 2.33 +/- 0.80 L/s; p > 0.0001) and the forced vital capacity (OC, 2.40 +/- 0.66 L; LC, 2.93 +/- 1.05 L; p > 0.01) were more suppressed in patients having OC than in those having LC. Similar results were found for the peak expiratory flow (OC, 3.51 +/- 1.35 L/s; LC, 4.27 +/- 1.66 L/s; p > 0.05), expiratory reserve volume (OC, 0.73 +/- 0.34 L; LC, 0.92 +/- 0.43 L; p > 0.05), and the midexpiratory phase of forced expiratory flow (FEF25-75) (OC, 1.45 +/- 0.54 L/s; LC, 1.60 +/- 0.73 L/s; NS). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was associated with a significantly lower incidence of (30 vs 70%) and less severe atelectasis and better oxygenation. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary function is better preserved after LC than after OC.

Cholecystectomy↗
PubMed2002

Comparison of long-term quality of life after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Although many studies have compared open and laparoscopic procedures, showing many advantages in favor of the laparoscopic technique during the early postoperative period, only a limited number of reports in the literature compare the two techniques during the later follow-up period with regard to quality of life. This study aimed to compare the effects of these two cholecystectomy techniques on the quality of life and clinical outcome of the patients during long-term follow-up evaluation. METHODS: This study evaluated 200 patients who underwent cholecystectomy operations with either technique between 1993 and 1999 in our department. There were 100 patients in each group. Both groups were similar with respect to age, gender, body mass indexes, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores, and indications for surgery. The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36 Health survey (SF-36), which includes 36 items, was used for evaluating the quality-of-life index. In addition to this, a system-specific instrument for gastrointestinal diseases was used to investigate clinical outcome. RESULTS: The mean administration time for the questionnaire was 46.8 +/- 18.7 months in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) group and 41.5 +/- 16 months in the open cholecystectomy (OC) group. Statistically significant differences were noted in the scores for all eight SF = 36 health status domains in favor of laparospopic surgery. No statistically significant difference was found for abdominal pain, location of the pain, referral to a doctor for the pain, accompanying symptoms, relieving factors for the pain, distention, and dyspeptic complaints, usage of antacid therapy, weight changes, changes in bowel habit, need for a special diet, or sexual functions between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The gastrointestinal clinical symptoms were similar in the two groups during the long-term follow-up evaluation, but laparoscopic cholecystectomy was found to be significantly superior to the open technique with respect to the quality of life over the long term.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed2006

Urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of acute cholecystitis: timing does not influence conversion rate.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of acute cholecystitis is urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Most reports suggest that a delay of 72 or 96 h from onset of symptoms leads to a higher conversion rate. This study assessed the conversion rate in relation to the timing of urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. METHODS: During a 12 month period, 112 patients received laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis at a tertiary care university hospital in central Taiwan. Data were collected prospectively. RESULTS: The overall conversion rate was 3.6% (4/112). Of 62 procedures performed within 72 h from onset of symptoms, 2 were converted, as compared with 2 of 50 procedures after 72 h. Of 76 procedures performed within 96 h from onset of symptoms, 3 were converted, as compared with 1 of 36 procedures after 96 h. There were no mortalities or common bile duct injuries. CONCLUSIONS: The conversion rate for urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy among patients with acute cholecystitis can be as low as 3.6%. The timing of urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy has no impact on the conversion rate.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

A comparative study of postoperative adhesion formation after laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: There is little evidence in the literature to support a lower incidence of adhesion formation following laparoscopic surgery rather than laparotomy. Adhesion formation after laparotomy has been well studied, but we believe that the decrease or absence of adhesions following laparoscopic surgery is underreported. Therefore, we set out to evaluate adhesion formation following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) compared with open cholecystectomy (OC). METHODS: Group A consisted of 18 patients who underwent a second laparoscopy due to various intraabdominal diseases after an LC had already been performed. Group B consisted of eight patients who underwent laparoscopy due to various intraabdominal diseases after an open cholecystectomy performed at an earlier date. In both groups, the frequency, extent, and thickness of adhesions were evaluated according to a standardized scoring system. RESULTS: Ten patients in group A (55.5%) had no adhesion formation either on the treated side of the previous LC or on the trocar entry sites. Three patients (16.6%) had minimal adhesions on the treated side of the previous LC, but no adhesions were observed at the trocar entry sites. Five patients (27.7%) had loose, easily separable adhesions on the treated site of the previous LC and at the trocar entry sites. All eight patients in group B (100%) had thick and extensive adhesions either on the treated side of the previous open cholecystectomy or the anterior abdominal wall below the surgical incision. CONCLUSION: This comparative clinical study suggests that LC results in less adhesion formation, either on the operative or at the trocar entry sites, than open cholecystectomy.

Abdomen↗
PubMed2001

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the new millennium.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the gold standard for the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis. Many authors-including investigators at our institution, who reported one of the initial experiences with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in July 1992-have documented a definite learning curve associated with this procedure. We present a follow-up study of our experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy and compare these data to an earlier study of the initial experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the Beth Israel Medical Center. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 300 consecutive patients from March 1998 through March 1999. The patient population was epidemiologically similar to that of the original study with regard to age, sex, and American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) classification. However, whereas the initial population included only patients with chronic disease, in our study 13.7% of the patients had been admitted through the emergency room with acute stone disease of the biliary tract. RESULTS: We found a 5.7% conversion rate, a 1% rate of major complication, and a 5.7% rate of minor complication rates, as compared to the initial study's rates of 12%, 4%, and 10%, respectively. Whereas none of the patients in the original study left the hospital on the day of surgery and only 49% were discharged within 1 day, in our group, 29 patients (10%) underwent ambulatory procedures and an additional 186 patients (62%) were discharged on the 1st post-operative day. The average duration of the operation was 90 min, which did not represent a statistical improvement over the time of 93 min reported in the earlier study. CONCLUSIONS: Since 1992, both the conversion rate and length of stay have declined at our hospital, but operative time has remained essentially the same. These findings probably reflect a bimodal learning curve, the increase in the number of cholangiograms and additional intraoperative procedures now performed, the greater severity of gallbladder disease currently treated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and increases in the number of attending physicians as well as the level of residents who perform this procedure.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Selection criteria for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an ambulatory care setting.

BACKGROUND: The ambulatory care center offers patient convenience and reduced costs after uneventful laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: A prospectively accumulated database of 1,750 cholecystectomies performed by one surgeon in a hospital setting was analyzed to test criteria for ambulatory cholecystectomy. Proposed criteria included age less than 65, absence of upper abdominal operations, and elective operations in healthy patients at low risk for common bile duct stones. RESULTS: Of 1,750 cholecystectomies, only 605 patients met all criteria for outpatient care. Discharge (from the in-hospital setting) was accomplished within 24 h of operation in 92% (first 3 years) and 98% (last 4 years) of selected cases. Only one patient (0.2%, 1/605) was converted to an open procedure; another was readmitted 30 h postoperatively with hemorrhage from the liver bed. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed safely in an ambulatory care setting, given careful selection and education of patients and documented experience of the surgical team.

Abdomen↗
PubMed1994

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in infants and children: modifications and cost analysis.

Between June 1990 and February 1993, 26 children underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Their ages ranged from 25 months to 19 years (mean, 12.3 years; median, 13 years). Only six of them had hemolytic diseases associated with gallstones. Five presented with acute cholecystitis. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed on these five, within 5 days of admission; the mean postoperative hospital stay was 2.5 days. The other 21 patients underwent elective cholecystectomy; their mean postoperative stay was 1 day. Several modifications have been made in our technique. Three 5-mm ports and one 10-mm umbilical port are used. In addition, direct incision of the umbilical fascia is performed with insertion of a blunt trocar and cannula rather than using the Veress needle for insufflation. The importance of positioning the epigastric cannula in the left upper quadrant in small children cannot be overemphasized. Cholangiography is now attempted in all patients and is easier with the Kumar cholangioclamp and sclerotherapy needle, under fluoroscopy. The total hospital charges for the patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy are compared retrospectively with those of seven children who had elective open cholecystectomy during the same period. In addition, a comparison is made between the two groups with respect to the costs of operating room equipment and postoperative pain control.

Child↗
PubMed1999

[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis].

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility, operative risk and patients' benefit of laparoscopy in emergency cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1991 to December 1998, 234 patients with acute calculous cholecystitis were operated on by emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There were 131 women and 103 men (mean age: 57 years), (Asa 2: 48%, Asa 3: 10%). In seven patients, choledocolithiasis was detected by endoscopic ultrasonography and preoperatively treated by endoscopic sphincterotomy. The mean delay between in-hospital admission and cholecystectomy was 20 hours (2-160). Cholecystectomy was performed with primary approach of Calot's triangle. Intraoperative cholangiography, selectively performed (n = 70), detected choledocolithiasis in three patients. RESULTS: The mean duration of surgery was 149 minutes (62-313). The conversion rate was 13% and decreased through the years. The postoperative complication rate was 18%. Eight patients (3.4%) had an abdominal complication. One patient (0.4%) died of bile peritonitis after intraoperative undetected main bile duct injury. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.04 days. It was 3.5 days only, very old patients and those with severe associated disease being excluded. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy appears to be a good approach for emergency cholecystectomy in patients with acute calculous cholecystitis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1994

The effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on resident training.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) on resident training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed our experience over an 11-year period, from academic years 1982 to 1992, with 3,046 patients who underwent elective open cholecystectomy (OC) and 640 patients who underwent LC. RESULTS: Prior to LC, junior residents performed 80% of all cholecystectomies, with a morbidity and mortality rate of 4% and 0.04%, respectively, compared with 11% and 0.3%, respectively, for senior residents who operated on higher-risk patients. Since the introduction of the technique, there has been a 25% increase in cholecystectomies per year, and a reduction in junior resident OC experience by 67%. Currently, 72% of all cholecystectomies are performed laparoscopically by senior residents. CONCLUSION: The replacement of OC by LC has produced a qualitative change in the operative experience of our junior residents and a delay in acquisition of operative skills. The reduction in OC experience by residents may jeopardize their ability to perform the difficult open cases.

Cholecystectomy↗
PubMed1993

Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: the Canadian experience. The McGill Gallstone Treatment Group.

Numerous uncontrolled trials have suggested that laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a major improvement over open cholecystectomy (OC). In an effort to objectively document the benefits of LC, two Canadian studies are reviewed. The first is a matched time series based on prospective data from a single surgeon's practice in which patients are closely matched for baseline characteristics. The groups consist of 121 patients from each of 3 time periods: 1989, prior to the introduction of LC; 1990, when LC was being introduced; and 1991, when LC had become the preferred method of cholecystectomy. The second study is a randomized trial, in which LC is compared with mini-cholecystectomy. In both studies, the superior efficacy of LC is demonstrated with respect to the duration of hospitalization and the duration of postoperative convalescence. The incidence of complications as well as their severity is also less in LC patients. Although quality of life improves after any type of cholecystectomy, LC patients improve faster and seem to accept the operation better. These studies support the widespread dispersion of LC in Canada, although comparative efficacy with nonsurgical alternatives has not been addressed.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Randomised, prospective, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: We report a prospective randomised comparison between laparoscopic and small-incision cholecystectomy in 200 patients which was designed to eliminate bias for or against either technique. METHODS: Patients were randomised in the operating theatre and anaesthetic technique and pain-control methods were standardised. Four experienced surgeons did both types of procedure. Identical wound dressings were applied in both groups so that carers could be kept blind to the type of operation. FINDINGS: There was no significant difference between the groups for age, sex, body mass index, and American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy took significantly longer than small-incision cholecystectomy (median 65 [range 27-140] min vs 40 [18-142] min, p<0.001). The operating time included operative cholangiography which was attempted in all patients. We found no significant difference between the groups for hospital stay (postoperative nights in hospital, median 3-0 [1-17] nights for laparoscopic vs 3-0 [1-14] nights for small-incision, p=0.74), time back to work for employed persons (median 5-0 weeks vs 4.0 weeks; p=0.39), and time to full activity (median 3-0 weeks vs 3.0 weeks; p=0.15). INTERPRETATION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy takes longer to do than small-incision cholecystectomy and does not have any significant advantages in terms of hospital stay or postoperative recovery.

Analgesia, Patient-Controlled↗
PubMed1993

[Postoperative respiratory function and cholecystectomy by laparoscopic approach].

Open cholecystectomy is associated with characteristic changes in pulmonary function showing a restrictive pattern. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without opening of the peritoneal cavity could be an alternative in reducing postoperative respiratory dysfunction. Having given their informed consent, 13 healthy ASA1 patients (age: 41 +/- 18 yrs) undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled in this study, in order to assess their postoperative pulmonary function tests (forced vital capacity [FRC], forced expiratory volume [FEV1], functional residual capacity [FRC]) before operation (T0) and 4 h (T4), 24 h (T24), 48 h (T48) after surgery. Anaesthesia technique was the same associating propofol-atracurium-fentanyl, 50% N2O/O2. Ventilation was adapted to maintain end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure up to 30-35 mmHg. Postoperative analgesic regimen consisted of paracetamol-ketoprofen. Mean length of surgery was 84 +/- 15 min; mean duration of anaesthesia was 110 +/- 24 min. An immediate and harmonious restrictive breathing pattern developed postoperatively. Postoperative FVC measured 65% (T4), 63% (T24), 72% (T48) of preoperative function (p < 0.025); postoperative FEV1 measured respectively 60, 66 and 75% of preoperative function (p > 0.001), without change in FEV1/CV and FRC; a significant hypoxia occurred (T0: 86 mmHg, T4: 80 mmHg, T24: 75 mmHg, T48: 81 mmHg [p < 0.05]). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy resulted in less postoperative respiratory dysfunction than conventional cholecystectomy, as previously reported; this restrictive pattern observed without changes in FRC was similar to that following lower abdominal surgery.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Reasons for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy: a 10-year review.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now considered the "gold standard" operation for patients with gallstone disease. A number of patients require conversion to an open cholecystectomy for the safe completion of the procedure. This study investigates how the etiology and incidence of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy has changed over time. All 5884 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy between March 1991 and June 2001 were prospectively collected in a database. A total of 310 patients (5.2%) had had their cholecystectomies converted to an open procedure. The mortality rate for these patients was 0.7%. Causes for conversion were inability to correctly identify anatomy (50%), "other" indications (16%), bleeding (14%), suspected choledocholithiasis (11%), and suspected bile duct injury (8%). After an initial learning curve in thin patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis, inclusion of patients with acute cholecystitis, morbid obesity, or a prior celiotomy resulted in a peak conversion rate of 11% by 1994. From 1994 to the first half of 2001, the conversion rate has declined significantly for all patients (10% to 1%), as well as for patients with acute cholecystitis (26% to 1%). Although unclear anatomy secondary to inflammation remains the most common reason for conversion, the impact of acute cholecystitis on the operative outcome has decreased with time.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1999

Diminished interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein responses to laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Cytokines and their inhibitors are thought to be involved in many of the pathophysiological changes associated with trauma and infection. The magnitude of the trauma and the degree of tissue damage have an impact on the trauma response. The purpose of the study was to examine cytokine and hormonal responses to elective cholecystectomy and the extent to which these responses are influenced by the surgical procedure employed. METHODS: Sixteen patients, ASA grades I and II, were studied: 8 of them underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy while the remaining 8 were operated on using the open technique. Systemic concentrations of tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), cortisol, epinephrine and norepinephrine were measured before and during the operation and subsequently for up to 48 h postoperatively. The degree of pain and fatigue were recorded during the study period. RESULTS: The preoperative levels of cytokines and hormones were all similar in the groups. Concentrations of TNF and IL-1 were detected only sporadically. The rise in plasma IL-6 was less marked following laparoscopic than after open cholecystectomy. However, the hormonal response was quite similar in the two groups. Pain and fatigue scores were lower (P < 0.05-0.01) in the laparoscopic group than in the open surgery group. CONCLUSION: In summary, cholecystectomy, irrespective of whether it was performed using the laparoscopic or open technique, was followed by a trauma response and increased pain and fatigue. However, the magnitude of stress, pain and fatigue was less pronounced in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. Concentrations of IL-6 seem to be more sensitive when it comes to delineating the trauma response than systemic norepinephrine and epinephrine levels.

Adult↗