Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Bone Marrow Purging”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 631 records · Page 35Linked to original sources
PubMed1987

Incubation of autologous bone marrow graft with ASTA Z 7557: comparative studies of hematological reconstitution after purged or nonpurged bone marrow transplantation.

Thirty-three patients with advanced solid tumors were treated by high-dose chemotherapy (combined high-dose melphalan), followed by cryopreserved autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT). Thirteen of them had bone marrow (BM) tumor involvement at diagnosis, and BM harvest was purged with 50 micrograms/ml ASTA Z 7557 before cryopreservation. Following incubation, in vitro growth of granulomonocytic colony-forming cells (GM-CFC) was regularly inhibited (greater than 99%). Hemopoietic reconstitution after purged and nonpurged ABMT was studied. All patients experienced engraftment. However, peripheral leukocyte and granulocyte recoveries were delayed significantly in patients receiving purged BM (mean 27 and 26 days) compared with those observed in patients receiving nonpurged BM (mean 18 and 18 days). These results confirm that purged BM, despite GM-CFC depletion after in vitro treatment, ensures engraftment after high-dose chemotherapy, but prolonged pancytopenia is observed and postgraft hemopoietic recovery is delayed. A clinical trial is necessary to evaluate the efficiency of the purging technique in eradicating residual tumor cells.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Future paradigm for autologous bone marrow transplantation: tumor purging and ex vivo production of normal stem and progenitor cells.

A major concern in autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) is the possible contamination of the graft with tumor cells. Transplantation of malignant cells, along with normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, may contribute to relapse of disease. Therefore, a growing strategy is to subject autologous marrow to some type of purging procedure to eliminate tumor cells selectively. Transplantation of purged marrow, however, often results in a delayed engraftment associated with (specific or nonspecific) loss of normal stem and progenitor cells during manipulations related to the purging process. A new and burgeoning field in the area of clinical bone marrow transplantation is the ex vivo production of stem and progenitor cells. Several advantages accrue to this strategy. First, this technology makes it possible to expand the stem and progenitor cell population of a small volume of bone marrow or mobilized peripheral blood (MPB), thus lessening the initial tumor burden to be purged. Secondly, ex vivo marrow or MPB expansion may overcome the significant problem of delayed engraftment by rebuilding the numbers of normal stem and progenitor cells necessary for both early and durable engraftment. To accomplish these and other objectives, an automated and closed, clinical-scale bioreactor system, based on continuous perfusion technology, is being developed and will soon enter clinical trials.

Bone Marrow Purging↗
PubMed1993

Amifostine-mediated protection of normal bone marrow from cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Amifostine (US Bioscience, West Conshohocken, PA; Ethyol, WR-2721), a phosphorylated thiol developed by the United States Army as a protective agent for military personnel in the event of nuclear warfare, has shown protection of normal tissues from the cytotoxic effects of therapeutic radiation and chemotherapy with preservation of cytotoxic effects on the tumor. The basis of this selective protection derives from the relatively rapid uptake and anabolism of Amifostine into normal tissues and minimal, slower uptake into tumor tissue. Preclinical investigations have demonstrated protection of bone marrow stem cells from the toxic effects of radiation and chemotherapy. Several controlled clinical trials demonstrated this hematoprotective effect. In patients given 1.5 g/m2 cyclophosphamide and month later given Amifostine (740 mg/m2) followed by the same dose of cyclophosphamide, the median nadir neutrophil count was significantly increased and duration of neutropenia was significantly reduced by pretreatment with Amifostine. In women with stage III/IV ovarian cancer treated with 1 g/m2 cyclophosphamide and 100 mg/m2 cisplatin +/- Amifostine 910 mg/m2, treatment with Amifostine before cyclophosphamide and cisplatin resulted in a significant decrease in both the incidence and duration of hospital stays for neutropenic fever compared to cyclophosphamide and cisplatin alone. There were equivalent rates of response and duration of survival in both groups. Other studies have shown Amifostine protects bone marrow purged in vitro with 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide before autologous bone marrow transplantation. This preservation of marrow stem cells resulted in a statistically significant decrease in time to marrow engraftment, need for platelet transfusions and antibiotics, and duration of hospital stay. Amifostine-mediated protection of normal bone marrow illustrated in preclinical experiments is also evident in clinical trials. Amifostine preserves trilineage stem cells (red blood cells, platelets, and white blood cells) in contrast to the lineage-specific effects of the colony-stimulating factors. Theoretically, Amifostine and the colony-stimulating factors should provide complementary benefits to bone marrow recovery and function after cytotoxic therapies. These observations offer the promise of using high doses of chemotherapy to exploit antitumor, dose-response relationships in clinical trials.

Amifostine↗
PubMed1999

Importance of marrow dose on posttransplant outcome in acute leukemia: models derived from patients autografted with mafosfamide-purged marrow at a single institution.

Several prospective randomized trials in acute myelocytic leukemia (AML) documented a lower relapse rate with autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) than with conventional chemotherapy. However, they also identified some transplant difficulties, such as failure to collect sufficient numbers of stem cells, slow kinetics of engraftment, and a high transplant-related mortality that diminished or negated positive impact on overall survival. Data for ABMT are inconclusive in acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) in adults. We retrospectively analyzed patients with acute leukemia autografted with marrow purged with mafosfamide after January 1983 in our institution. The population comprised 229 consecutive patients; 165 with AML [123 in first remission (CR1), 32 in second remission (CR2)]; 61 with ALL (46 in CR1, 4 in CR2); and 3 with undifferentiated acute leukemia. All patients were autografted with marrow purged with mafosfamide. Mafosfamide was given at a constant dose of 50 microg/mL in 103 and adjusted individually to produce a CFU-GM LD 95 (5% residual CFU-GM post purging) in 126. The outcome was analyzed for correlation with patient characteristics, the disease including cytogenetics, and the graft itself. Prognostic factors identified by multivariate analysis were used to derive a prognostic classification. Patients receiving higher doses of marrow submitted to purging (>5.46 x 10(4) CFU-GM/kg) experienced a lower treatment-related mortality (RR = 0.11, p = 0.005) and a higher leukemia-free (RR = 0.5, p = 0.005) and overall survival (RR = 0.4, p = 0.001). Patients receiving <0.004% CFU-GM of marrow actually infused post purging had a lower relapse rate (RR = 0.51, p = 0.003). Modeling of prognostic groups identified good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk categories. Patients receiving a stem cell dose evaluated before purging of >5.46 x 10(4) CFU-GM/kg and doses actually infused post purging of < or =0.02 x 10(4)/kg had a treatment-related mortality of only 2+/-2%, a leukemia-free survival of 70%, and an overall survival of 77+/-7% at 10 years. In this study of autotransplantation for acute leukemia using mafosfamide-purged marrow, the stem cell dose used for purging and the intensity of purging were the most important factors predicting outcome.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Photodynamic actinometry using microspheres: concept, development and responsivity.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) relies on three main ingredients, oxygen, light and photoactivating compounds, although the PDT response is definitively contingent on the site and level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. This study describes the development of a novel, fluorescent-based actinometer microsphere system as a means of discerning spatially resolved dosimetry of total fluence and ROS production. Providing a high resolution, localized, in situ measurement of fluence and ROS generation is critical for developing in vivo PDT protocols. Alginate-poly-L-lysine-alginate microspheres were produced using ionotropic gelation of sodium alginate droplets, ranging from 80 to 200 microm in diameter, incorporating two dyes, ADS680WS (ADS) and Rhodophyta-phycoerythrin (RPE), attached to the spheres' inside and outside layers, respectively. To test the responsivity and dynamic range of RPE for ROS detection, the production of ROS was initiated either chemically using increasing concentrations of potassium perchromate or photochemically using aluminum tetrasulphonated phthalocyanine. The generation of singlet oxygen was confirmed by phosphorescence at 1270 nm. The resulting photodegradation and decrease in fluorescence of RPE was found to correlate with increased perchromate or PDT treatment fluence, respectively. This effect was independent of pH (6.5-8) and could be inhibited using sodium azide. RPE was not susceptible to photobleaching with light alone (670 nm; 150 Jcm(-2)). ADS, which absorbs light between 600 and 750 nm, showed a direct correlation between radiant exposure (670 nm; 0-100 Jcm(-2)) and diminished fluorescence. Photobleaching was independent of irradiance (10-40 mW cm(-2)). We propose that actinometer microspheres may provide a means for obtaining high spatial resolution information regarding delivered PDT dose within model systems during investigational PDT development and dosimetric information for clinical extracorporeal PDT as in the case of ex vivo bone marrow purging.

Bone Marrow Purging↗