Use of frequency discrimination in the automatic electroencephalographic control of anesthesia (servo-anesthesia).
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Pneumothorax may be a medical emergency. Iatrogenic pneumothorax is more common than all other forms of spontaneous pneumothorax, and surgical procedures involving the breast are a frequent setting for this. A 32-year-old, 60 kg, woman without any significant medical history underwent a bilateral breast augmentation and rhinoplasty. She underwent a routine general endotracheal anesthetic. Prior to surgical incision, the surgeon infiltrated the breast with lidocaine with epinephrine. Six hours into the surgical procedure, the patient developed hemodynamic compromise and was diagnosed with tension pneumothorax, which was treated emergently with a 14-gauge angiocatheter placed intrapleurally. The patient immediately returned to hemodynamic stability. This case report discusses iatrogenic pneumothoraces as well their most likely causes; which in this specific case was the injection of local anesthetic. Suggestions for prevention and treatment of the unusual complication are discussed.
The data support but do not conclusively prove, that RA results in a superior recovery compared with GA. However, several questions need to be answered. Even though the patient may leave the hospital or surgicenter sooner after RA, how does the patient treat pain at home once the block has "worn off"? Since short-acting sedatives and opioids are so commonly used with RA, to what extent is recovery due to them and to what extent is recovery due to the RA alone? Many of the studies examining beneficial effects of RA have been poorly conducted, combining RA with GA and producing inconclusive results. Anesthetic techniques need to be carefully compared to determine whether they are equal in quality, efficiency, and cost. Finally, to determine whether RA is cost-effective, future studies involving ambulatory patients with a focus on outcome and well-being need to be conducted.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: It is known that smokers and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) experience a higher rate of pulmonary-related complications following abdominal surgery. The impact of anesthetic technique (regional [RA] versus general [GA] versus combination of both) on the complication rate has not been established. This study examined the outcomes of abdominal surgery performed using RA (epidural or continuous spinal) as the sole anesthetic technique in patients with severe pulmonary impairment (SPI). METHODS: We reviewed a series of 8 general surgery cases performed using RA alone (T4-T6 sensory level) in patients with SPI, as evidenced by an forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) less than 50% predicted and/or home oxygen requirement. One patient also received postoperative epidural analgesia. FEV(1) ranged from 0.3 to 1.84 L; 3 patients required home oxygen therapy, and 5 of the 8 were American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class 4. Operations included segmental colectomy (n = 2), open cholecystectomy (n = 1), incisional herniorrhaphy (n = 1), and laparoscopic herniorrhaphy (n = 4). RESULTS: Intraoperative conditions were adequate with RA alone for successful completion of the procedure in all cases. All patients recovered uneventfully except for 1 who developed postoperative pneumonia that resolved with standard therapy. Length of stay was less than 24 hours for 5 of 8 patients. Mortality was 0%. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal surgery can be safely performed using RA alone in selected high-risk patients, making this option an attractive alternative to GA for those with severe pulmonary impairment.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Attempts have been made to correlate the duration of the local anesthetic effect with the amount of the local anesthetic compound remaining at the injection site at different times after an injection. In addition to delaying the absorption of the local anesthetic, adrenaline but not a vasopressin-derivate decreased the minimal anesthetic concentration of the local anesthetic agent. It is assumed that the pH value of the tissues at the injection site was kept down through the metabolic effects of adrenaline, thereby transforming the local anesthetic agent into cations, which is the form in which the amide-type of local anesthetics mainly exerts their nerve blocking activity.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We report a case of pupilloplasty under peribulbar anaesthesia complicated by a brainstem anaesthesia requiring tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. Immediate outcome was good. We discuss the different mechanisms of this complication. The subarachnoidal (intrathecal) injection of local anaesthesic seems to be the most probable cause. The use of short needles should theoretically decrease the risk. Despite all these precautions, peribulbar anaesthesia should not be considered as an ordinary procedure.
In this review article the pro's and contra's of the use of either inhalational or intravenous anaesthetics for neurosurgical procedures are discussed. The objective is to stimulate thoughts concerning controversial subjects, rather than to resolve issues. It is much less complicated to approach the practice of neuroanaesthesia with a few straight forward "rules" based on laboratory measurements (such as intravenous drugs are good because they reduce CBF and ICP, whereas inhalational agents are bad because they increase CBF and ICP). It should also be noted that whereas statements about potential detrimental or beneficial effects of different anaesthetic agents are relatively common, there is a dearth of well-designed prospective studies of sufficient power to substantiate the outcome advantages or disadvantages. The choice of an anaesthetic should include more than just a consideration of the potential intracranial effects of a drug: it should also include experience with a drug and, more important a consideration of the patient as a whole.
A prospective study was carried out to compare the qualities of spinal block with those of combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia (CSEA). It included 63 patients, ranked ASA 1 or 2, aged between 35 and 75 years, scheduled for gynaecological surgery due to last more than 2 hours, and randomly allocated to two groups. In the first group (n = 34), spinal anaesthesia was carried out with the patients sitting, in the L3-4 interspace, using 15 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine with 0.4 mg of adrenaline. In the second group (n = 29), a catheter was inserted in the epidural space through the L2-3 interspace, and spinal anaesthesia carried out as in the first group, using bupivacaine without adrenaline. Once the highest level of analgesia had been reached, aliquots of 0.5% plain bupivacaine were injected through the epidural catheter, until anaesthesia of T5 was obtained. In the spinal group, general anaesthesia was required in 3 cases, as anaesthesia only reached the T12 level in 2 cases, and as surgery lasted longer than the spinal in the third one. In the CSEA group, excellent analgesia was obtained in all patients. Sensory blockade lasted 308 +/- 48 min at the T12 level, versus 162 +/- 51 min in the spinal group (p < 0.025), and 361 +/- 51 min at the L2 level, versus 210 < 44 min in the other group (p < 0.025). "Topping up" was possible with the epidural catheter only, thus raising the level of sensory blockade, making it deeper, and increasing its duration. It avoids the use of general anaesthesia in case of failed spinal blockade.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Sixteen ASA 1 or 2 patients scheduled for abdominal surgery were included in the study after they had given their informed consent. Thirty minutes after starting a low-thoracic epidural anaesthesia (median level of sensitivity loss: T5), the patients were randomly given an intravenous bolus injection of either thiopentone (4 mg.kg-1, n = 8) or etomidate (0.5 mg.-1, n = 8), associated with succinylcholine 1 mg.kg-1. One minute after induction of general anaesthesia, the patients were intubated and mechanically ventilated (V(T) 8 ml.kg-1, rate 12 c.min-1). Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) (oscillometric method), cardiac output (CO) (transthoracic bioimpedance) and heart rate were recorded semi-continuously. Total peripheral resistances (TPR) were calculated using the formula TPR = (MA/CO)*80. There were no differences between the groups in patient age, height, weight, and cardiovascular consequences of epidural anaesthesia. After anaesthetic induction and before endotracheal intubation, there was a slight decrease in CO in both groups, without any change in MAP. After intubation, MAP increased in both groups through peripheral vasoconstriction, whereas CO did not increase further. A significant tachycardia was occurred only seen in the thiopentone group, before and after tracheal intubation. This study showed that thiopentone and etomidate were suitable drugs for anaesthetic induction in a patient under epidural blockade. However, the absence of tachycardia following etomidate may be beneficial in cardiac patients. The monitoring of cardiac output determinants during thiopentone and etomidate anaesthesia require further invasive investigations.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Due to the cutaneous and mucosal fragility associated with epidermolysis bullosa, this disease is a source of various practical problems for the anaesthesiologist concerning the surgical posture, the monitoring of vital functions, the airways control and the vascular access, as all these procedures may worsen, sometimes dramatically, the lesions in these young patients, still in a precarious health state. Basing on published studies and their own experience, the authors have used in these patients a combined locoregional and general anaesthesia. The latter was obtained with isoflurane, administered in the non intubated and spontaneously breathing patient through a closed surgical isolation container (Vi-Drape), including the patient's head and ventilated with a ventilator generating a PEEP for long procedures. The results obtained during 9 procedures in 3 children are reported and discussed. For several shorter procedures (for example wound dressing), intramuscular ketamine was used.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.