PubMed1999
Minor bilateral or radial asymmetry of leaves or flowers, the frequency of phenodeviants, intraindividual variation in repeated characters, and fractal dimensions of morphology are considered to represent measures of developmental instability since deviations from regularity of the phenotype constitute a measure of the inability to maintain developmental precision during ontogeny. First, we review patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in plants and show that levels of asymmetry are considerably greater than in animals. While petal asymmetry tends to decrease with petal size within species, leaf asymmetry tends to increase with leaf size. Intraspecific correlations of petal asymmetry and leaf asymmetry are weakly positive. Second, a meta-analysis of the effects of environmental factors hypothesized to increase asymmetry in leaves and flowers, such as radiation, ultraviolet light, excess artificial fertilizer, pollutants, extreme saline conditions, herbivory, and competition, showed intermediate (i.e., explaining 10% of the variance) to large (i.e., explaining 25% of the variance) effects. Third, a meta-analysis of the effects of genetic factors hypothesized to contribute to increased asymmetry in plants, such as homozygosity, hybridization, mutation, and quantitative genetic differences among individuals, showed variable but usually significant effects, although the number of studies generally was small. Controlled experimental studies of environmental and genetic effects on developmental instability of plants may increase our understanding of the mechanisms causing developmental instability.