Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Vomiting”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 613 records · Page 34Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Preoperative oral granisetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after breast surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral granisetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after breast surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: University affiliated hospital, Japan. SUBJECTS: 100 women listed for partial or modified radical mastectomy with or without axillary dissection. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were given either placebo or granisetron in three different doses (1 mg, 2 mg, 4 mg) orally 1 hour preoperatively (n = 25 in each group). A standard general anaesthetic technique and postoperative analgesia were used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All episodes of nausea and vomiting during the first 24 hours after anaesthesia. RESULTS: Complete response, defined as no nausea and vomiting and no need for a "rescue" antiemetic, during the first 24 hours after anaesthesia was recorded in 13 (52%) with placebo, 14 (56%) with granisetron 1 mg, 22 (88%) with 2 mg, and 22 (88%) with 4 mg, respectively (p = 0.006, Fisher's exact test). No clinically serious adverse events were seen in any of the groups. CONCLUSION: Preoperative oral granisetron, in doses of more than 2 mg, is effective for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in women undergoing general anaesthesia for breast surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy with ramosetron: randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ramosetron (a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonist) for the prevention of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. DESIGN: Prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: University and university-affiliated hospitals, Japan. SUBJECTS: 100 patients, 65 women and 35 men, who had laparoscopic cholecystectomy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were given either placebo or ramosetron at 3 different doses (0.15 mg, 0.3 mg, 0.6 mg) intravenously at the completion of operation. The general anaesthetic technique and postoperative analgesia were standard. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Vomiting and safety were assessed for 0 to 24 hours and 24 to 48 hours after anaesthesia. RESULTS: The number of patients who had a complete response (no nausea, no retching, no vomiting) during 0 to 24 hours after anaesthesia was 15/25 with placebo, 17/25 with ramosetron 0.15 mg, 23/25 with ramosetron 0.3 mg, and 23/25 with ramosetron 0.6 mg; The corresponding numbers from 24 to 48 hours were 16, 17, 23, and 23. No serious adverse events were observed in any of the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ramosetron 0.3 mg was the minimum effective dose for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting during 0 to 48 hours after anaesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed2001

Cisplatin-induced vomiting depends on circadian timing.

We examined whether the clock time of cisplatin plus antiemetic and diuretic administration affects the amount of cisplatin-associated emesis and severity of renal toxicity. We treated 22 patients with urogenital cancer with two courses of chemotherapy containing 70 mg/m2 of cisplatin. Cisplatin together with furosemide was administered in the morning (05:00) or evening (17:00) during two courses 1 month apart in a crossover fashion. Ondansetron was given either before or after cisplatin to control nausea and vomiting. The number of vomiting episodes, serum creatinine, serum urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine clearance, and urinary beta-N-acetyl glucosamidase (NAG) concentration were evaluated before and after each treatment course. Regardless of the timing of ondansetron, morning compared to evening cisplatin was always associated with greater vomiting in the first treatment course. However, prophylactic administration of ondansetron markedly diminished the impact of the clock time of cisplatin administration. Serum creatinine transiently decreased rather than increased 14 days after cisplatin and furosemide administration, while NAG excretion increased 3 days after cisplatin and furosemide administration. In the first course, serum creatinine levels were similar regardless of the clock time of cisplatin and furosemide administration. However, in the second course, serum creatinine rose in patients given evening cisplatin and furosemide, while it remained unchanged in those given morning cisplatin and furosemide. Moreover, the first course morning cisplatin and furosemide treatment was associated with less change in NAG excretion (less kidney toxicity) than the first course of evening cisplatin and furosemide treatment. The second course evening cisplatin and furosemide treatment was associated with an increase in NAG excretion compared to the first course of treatment, while morning cisplatin and furosemide treatment in the second course showed less change in NAG excretion compared to the first course. The clock time of cisplatin administration had an impact on the frequency of emesis. Prophylactic ondansetron, however, diminished the time-of-day dependency of cisplatin-induced vomiting. Administration of cisplatin and furosemide in the morning rather than evening appears to cause less renal damage, and this damage may be further reduced with aggressive hydration and routine administration of furosemide.

Acetylglucosaminidase↗
PubMed2005

Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation versus ondansetron in the prevention of postoperative vomiting following pediatric tonsillectomy.

OBJECTIVES: Postoperative retching and vomiting is an important cause of morbidity that may lead to patient discomfort, distress, and complications. Stimulation of acupuncture points has been shown to be effective in the prevention as well as treatment of PONV. The current treatments of choice are the 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3-antagonists, such as ondansetron. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and side-effects of either transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) or Ondansetron compared to a control group receiving no treatment in the prevention of postoperative retching and vomiting. SUBJECT AND DESIGN: This randomized, controlled, prospective study was carried out in a group of 90 children (in three equal randomly assigned groups), aged between 4 and 12 who underwent tonsillectomy under general anesthesia. In the first group, electrical stimulation via surface electrodes on acupoints Neiguan and Shangwan was performed (20 Hz, 5 minutes). The second group received a single dose of Ondansetron (0.15 mg . kg(-1)). No treatment was given to the control group. OUTCOME MEASURES: The frequency of retching and vomiting attacks and side-effects were noted on the day of surgery in the postanesthesia care unit and the day surgery care unit, on the day of surgery after discharge, and on the first day after surgery. A satisfaction scale was completed by each family. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the treatment groups and the control group in the incidence of emetic episodes occurring in the day surgery care unit and on the day after discharge (p < 0.001). In the ondansetron group, side-effects were seen in more patients than in the other groups (p < 0.001). The satisfaction scores of the parents were greater in the treatment groups than in the control group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Application of TEAS on sedated children is an easy, painless, reliable and effective method for the prophylaxis of postoperative retching and vomiting in pediatric tonsillectomy.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed1993

Efficacy and tolerability of tropisetron and dexamethasone in the control of nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin.

A multicentre study was performed at four oncology centres in Sweden, in 160 chemotherapy-naive women, primarily with ovarian or endometrial carcinomas. Abdominal surgery preceded chemotherapy in 146 (91%) women, and another 39 (24%) women had a history of radiotherapy. The chemotherapy regimens contained cisplatin (50-100 mg/m2), in combination with a variety of other agents. In Course 1, all patients received tropisetron (5 mg i.v. Day 1; 5 mg p.o. Days 2-6) and 84% of patients achieved total or partial control of vomiting; 95% of patients achieved total or partial control of nausea during the first 24 hours. Vomiting was least successfully controlled on Day 2 (73% total or partial control) and Days 2-4 for the control of nausea (81, 83, 88% total or partial control, respectively). Patients with partial response in Course 1 (39% of patients) were randomized to addition of dexamethasone or placebo in Course 2. In Course 2, tropisetron plus dexamethasone (Group B2) prevented acute vomiting in 75% of patients, compared with 40% of patients receiving tropisetron plus placebo (Group B1). Over the entire 6 days, there was no vomiting at all in 54% and 20% of B2 and B1 patients, respectively. In Course 2, acute nausea was prevented in 75% of patients (receiving B1) and in 37% of patients (receiving B2). For nausea, over the complete 6 days, the figures were 64% and 3% (p < 0.001). This indicated that patients with incomplete control of emesis in Course 1 benefited from the addition of dexamethasone, provided that it was added for each of the 6 days studied.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Tropisetron in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: the Nordic experience.

An open, non-comparative, Nordic multicenter study was performed during 1991-1992 to evaluate the new 5-HT3 receptor antagonist tropisetron, as an antiemetic agent in various types of cancer chemotherapy. More than 600 patients were recruited from 16 cancer centers in Sweden, Finland and Denmark. In this report an interim analysis on 231 patients is presented. Gynecological cancers (61%), lung cancer (14%) and breast cancer (7%), were the main diagnoses. In 118 of 231 patients (51%) prior experience of chemotherapy was documented. In 91 patients (39%) cisplatin was part of the cytostatic regimen. Carboplatin (27%), doxorubicin (32%), epidoxorubicin (18%) were also frequently included. In all, 18 cytostatic agents were studied. The median number of courses studied was 3.3 (range 1-15). Overall 153 of 231 patients (67%) were completely protected from acute nausea and vomiting during the first course of chemotherapy. Delayed nausea and vomiting (Days 2-6) were completely controlled in 45%-72%. Treatment efficacy remained stable (57%-89%) over 10 consecutive courses of chemotherapy. For non-cisplatin regimens complete protection was achieved in 78% compared with 51% for cisplatin-regimens (p < 0.0001). Patients with no prior experience of chemotherapy had greater control of acute nausea and vomiting (73%) than patients treated before (61%) in the first course, but not in subsequent courses. There were no such differences in control of delayed nausea and vomiting between chemotherapy-naive and previously treated patients. Sex and age were significant prognostic factors with regard to antiemetic response. Adverse events were recorded in 19%-36% of the cases during long-term follow-up. Headache (16%) and constipation (5%) were most frequent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Single-dose i.v. granisetron in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

In this randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study, we have compared three doses (0.1 mg, 1.0 mg and 3.0 mg) of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, granisetron (Kytril), as prophylactic therapy for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. The aims were to determine the optimal dose of granisetron and to evaluate its safety profile. We studied 527 adult patients, undergoing elective open abdominal surgery or vaginal hysterectomy during general anaesthesia. Antiemetic prophylaxis with a single dose of granisetron 1.0 mg or 3.0 mg resulted in a significant reduction (P < 0.001 compared with placebo) in the numbers of patients experiencing postoperative vomiting, or nausea, or who achieved total control during the postoperative periods 0-6 h and 0-24 h. The two higher doses of granisetron (1.0 mg and 3.0 mg) provided effective prophylaxis against vomiting, with 78% and 77% of patients, respectively, being free from vomiting in the first 6 h after surgery, and 63% and 62% in the first 24 h. This compares with 50% and 34% at 0-6 h and 0-24 h, respectively, in the placebo group. Granisetron was well tolerated and the optimum dose was 1.0 mg.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Metoclopramide in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a quantitative systematic review of randomized, placebo-controlled studies.

Metoclopramide has been used for almost 40 yr to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). We have reviewed the efficacy and safety of metoclopramide for the prevention of PONV. A systematic search (MEDLINE, EMBASE, manufacturers' databases, hand searching, bibliographies, all languages, up to June 1998) was performed for full reports of randomized comparisons of metoclopramide with placebo in surgical patients. Relevant end-points were prevention of early PONV (within 6 h after operation), late PONV (48 h) and adverse effects. Combined data were analysed using relative benefit/risk and number-needed-to-treat/harm. In 66 studies, 3260 patients received 18 different regimens of metoclopramide, and 3006 controls received placebo or no treatment. There was no evidence of dose-responsiveness with oral, i.m., intranasal or i.v. metoclopramide in children and adults. In adults, the best documented regimen was 10 mg i.v. There was no significant anti-nausea effect. The numbers-needed-to-treat to prevent early and late vomiting were 9.1 (95% confidence intervals 5.5-27) and 10 (6-41), respectively. In children, the best documented regimen was 0.25 mg kg-1 i.v. The number-needed-to-treat to prevent early vomiting was 5.8 (3.9-11). There was no significant late anti-vomiting effect. Minor drug-related adverse effects (sedation, dizziness, drowsiness) were not significantly associated with metoclopramide. There was one adult who experienced extrapyramidal symptoms with metoclopramide.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Dexamethasone reduces nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

We have evaluated the antiemetic effect of i.v. dexamethasone compared with saline in the prevention of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We studied 90 patients requiring general anaesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The dexamethasone group (n = 45) received dexamethasone 8 mg i.v. and the saline group received saline 2 ml i.v. at induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia was maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. We found that 10% of patients in the dexamethasone group compared with 34% in the saline group reported vomiting (P < 0.05). Of note, the total incidence of nausea and vomiting was 23% in the dexamethasone group and 63% in the saline group (P < 0.001). We conclude that dexamethasone 8 mg significantly decreased the incidence of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Supplemental oxygen for prevention of nausea and vomiting after breast surgery.

BACKGROUND: Administration of supplemental oxygen 80% has been shown to halve the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). We tested the efficacy of supplemental oxygen 50% in decreasing the incidence of PONV after breast surgery. METHODS: One hundred patients receiving standardized sevoflurane anaesthesia were randomly assigned to two groups: oxygen 30% administration (Group 30); and oxygen 50% administration (Group 50). Oxygen was administered during surgery and for 2 h from the end of surgery. RESULTS: The incidence of PONV over 24 h after surgery showed no difference between the groups: 82% in Group 30 and 89% in Group 50. However, during the postoperative oxygen administration, eight patients vomited in Group 30, compared with none in Group 50 (P<0.05). After oxygen therapy ceased, there was no difference in the incidence of vomiting between the groups. Nausea and need for rescue antiemetics did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: The incidence of vomiting decreased during the short postoperative administration of supplemental oxygen 50%. However, perioperative oxygen 50% administration did not prevent PONV over the 24-h follow-up period in patients undergoing breast surgery performed under general anaesthesia.

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed2004

Effect of intraoperative intravenous crystalloid infusion on postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynaecological laparoscopy: comparison of 30 and 10 ml kg(-1).

BACKGROUND: I.V. fluid administration has been shown to reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). The optimum dose is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that administration of i.v. crystalloid of 30 ml kg(-1) would reduce the incidence of PONV compared with 10 ml kg(-1) of the same fluid. METHODS: A total of 141 ASA I female patients undergoing elective gynaecological laparoscopy were randomized, in double-blind fashion, to receive either 10 ml kg(-1) (n=71; CSL-10 group) or 30 ml kg(-1) (n=70; CSL-30 group) of i.v. compound sodium lactate (CSL). RESULTS: In the first 48 h after anaesthesia, the incidence of vomiting was lower in the CSL-30 group than in the CSL-10 group (8.6% vs 25.7%, P=0.01). Anti-emetic use was less in the CSL-30 group at 0.5 h (2.9% vs 14.3%, P=0.04). The incidence of severe nausea was significantly reduced in the treatment group at awakening (2.9% vs 15.7%, P=0.02), 2 h (0.0% vs 8.6%, P=0.04) and cumulatively (5.7% vs 27.1%, P=0.001). The numbers needed to treat to prevent vomiting, severe nausea and antiemetic use in the first 48 h were 6, 5 and 6, respectively. CONCLUSION: I.V. administration of CSL 30 ml kg(-1) to healthy women undergoing day-case gynaecological laparoscopy reduced the incidence of vomiting, nausea and anti-emetic use when compared with CSL 10 ml kg(-1).

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Tolerability of acute postoperative pain management: nausea, vomiting, sedation, pruritus, and urinary retention. Evidence from published data.

This review examines the evidence from published data concerning the tolerability (indicated by the incidence of nausea, vomiting, sedation, pruritus, and urinary retention), of three analgesic techniques after major surgery; intramuscular analgesia (i.m.), patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and epidural analgesia. A MEDLINE search of publications concerned with the management of postoperative pain and these indicators identified over 800 original papers and reviews. Of these, data were extracted from 183 studies relating to postoperative nausea and vomiting, 89 relating to sedation, 166 relating to pruritus, and 94 relating to urinary retention, giving pooled data which represent a total of more than 100,000 patients. The overall mean (95% CI) incidence of nausea was 25.2 (19.3-32.1)% and of emesis was 20.2 (17.5-23.2)% for all three analgesic techniques. PCA was associated with the highest incidence of nausea but the emesis was unaffected by analgesic technique. There was considerable variability in the criteria used for defining sedation. The overall mean for mild sedation was 23.9 (23-24.8)% and for excessive sedation was 2.6 (2.3-2.8)% for all three analgesic techniques (significantly lower with epidural analgesia). The overall mean incidence of pruritus was 14.7 (11.9-18.1)% for all three analgesic techniques (lowest with i.m. analgesia). Urinary retention occurred in 23.0 (17.3-29.9)% of patients (highest with epidural analgesia). The incidence of nausea and excessive sedation decreased over the period 1980-99, but the incidence of vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention did not. From these published data it is possible to set standards of care after major surgery for nausea 25%, vomiting 20%, minor sedation 24%, excessive sedation 2.6%, pruritus 14.7%, and urinary retention requiring catheterization 23%. Acute Pain Services should aim for incidences less than this standard of care.

Analgesia↗
PubMed2006

Inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8 compared with 0.4 does not further reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting in dolasetron-treated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of the most frequent complications after general anaesthesia. Single-dose antiemetic prophylaxis has limited efficacy in high-risk patients. Adding a simple potential antiemetic approach, such as increasing the inspired oxygen fraction, to the antiemetic portfolio would preserve pharmacological interventions for treatment of symptoms in the postoperative period. However, the antiemetic effect of a high inspired oxygen fraction is still discussed controversially. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether an inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8 decreases PONV in patients receiving the 5-HT3-antagonist dolasetron. METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial we studied 377 patients (ASA I-III) undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Induction of anaesthesia was standardized, including thiopental fentanyl and cis-atracurium. For all patients the individual risk for PONV was calculated using the Koivuranta score and all patients received 12.5 mg dolasetron i.v. before surgery. Patients were allocated randomly to one of three groups: Group A (n=125) received 80% oxygen in air, Group B (n=125) 40% oxygen in air and Group C (n=127) 40% oxygen in nitrous oxide. Postoperative nausea, postoperative vomiting (PV), or nausea, vomiting, or both (PONV) was assessed in the early (0-4 h) and overall postoperative period (0-24 h) by an anaesthesiologist unaware of patient allocation. RESULTS: There was a significantly lower incidence of PONV and PV in Groups A (PONV: 11.2%; PV: 3.2%) and B (PONV: 10.4%; PV: 3.2%) compared with Group C (PONV: 26.7%; PV: 13.3%), but there were no significant differences between Groups A and B. CONCLUSIONS: An inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8 does not further decrease PONV or vomiting in dolasetron-treated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The lower incidence of PONV in Groups A and B compared with Group C is most likely caused by the omission of nitrous oxide.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Navoban (tropisetron, ICS 205-930) and dexamethasone combination in the prevention of vomiting for patients receiving preconditioning high-dose chemotherapy before marrow transplantation.

The anti-emetic efficacy of a combination of tropisetron and dexamethasone was studied in 33 patients who underwent bone marrow transplantation. Another 50 patients receiving conventional anti-emetic therapies in bone marrow transplantation served as control. On the first and second days of preconditioning chemotherapy, 51% and 36% respectively of patients in the tropisetron and dexamethasone group did not experience vomiting, compared with only 12% and 10% of control group patients (P < 0.001). The mean number of episodes of vomiting in the tropisetron and dexamethasone group was also significantly lower than in the control group (0.97+/-1.65 vs 3.50+/-2.45 and 1.30+/-1.40 vs 4.44+/-2.91 respectively, both P < 0.001). Control of vomiting in the two groups was not significantly different during days 3-6. Analysis of patients receiving busulfan and cyclophosphamide as the preconditioning regimen still showed better anti-emetic control in the tropisetron and dexamethasone group than in the control group on the first two days of treatment (total control rate 33.3% vs 6.5% and 44.4% vs 12.9% respectively, P < 0.001). Patients given tropisetron and dexamethasone combination more frequently suffered from dizziness and burning sensation of the chest. However, diarrhea and extrapyramidal symptoms were the most frequent adverse effects seen after using conventional anti-emetic combination. The combination of tropisetron and dexamethasone was thus superior to conventional anti-emetic combinations in preventing vomiting during preconditioning period of bone marrow transplantation. The adverse effects of this combination were minimal and well tolerated by patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Intractable vomiting from glioblastoma metastatic to the fourth ventricle: three case studies.

Dissemination of malignant glioma to the fourth ventricle with metastatic deposits and intractable vomiting is rare. Leptomeningeal extension of malignant glioma is an uncommon condition that has been reported in patients with end-stage disease and is usually unresponsive to any treatment modality. We describe 3 patients with progressing recurrent glioblastoma multiforme in whom leptomeningeal invasion manifested itself as intractable vomiting due to tumor metastases in the floor of the fourth ventricle. All patients received additional radiation therapy focused to the posterior fossa, with complete resolution of vomiting occurring within 10 days after irradiation. The remission of symptoms in these patients persisted until their death 3-4 months after the repeat radiation therapy. These reports indicate that additional focused radiation should be considered because of its significant therapeutic effect in alleviating intractable nausea and vomiting in patients with glioma metastasized to the posterior fossa.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Oral ondansetron in the prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting induced by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in women with breast cancer. Results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The combination of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) is a widely used chemotherapy regimen in breast cancer patients. However, the control of nausea and vomiting induced by oral CMF is a rarely examined problem. Therefore we felt a randomized, placebo controlled study justified in order to improve currently available antiemetic therapy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In a randomised double-blind trial ondansetron given orally, 8 mg three times a day for 15 days, was compared with placebo in 82 breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with CMF (cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 orally days 1-14, methotrexate 40 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8 and 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8). The patients recorded nausea and the number of vomits and retches daily on diary cards. Forty-two patients received ondansetron and 40 received placebo. RESULTS: Significantly more patients who received ondansetron experienced neither vomiting nor retching (emesis) compared to those receiving placebo over a 15 day treatment period (60% vs. 35%, p = 0.027). The difference, with 95% confidence limits, was estimated at 25 (4.45%). Furthermore, there was a trend in favour of ondansetron in the control of nausea. Ondansetron was well tolerated, with 25 patients (59%) reporting at least 1 adverse event compared to 18 patients (45%) receiving placebo (p = 0.191). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that ondansetron given orally for 15 days is safe and effective in the control of emesis induced by CMF. It is however too early to recommend ondansetron as standard antiemetic therapy for oral CMF, as the treatment of nausea and vomiting in this setting has not been studied thoroughly enough.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1992

Variables contributing to anticipatory nausea and vomiting in cancer chemotherapy.

Forty cancer patients receiving parenteral chemotherapy were assessed for characteristics associated with the development of anticipatory nausea and vomiting (ANV). The patients who developed ANV were more likely to have increased pretreatment anxiety (p less than 0.05), greater posttreatment dizziness/lightheadedness (p less than 0.01), more severe postchemotherapy vomiting (p less than 0.01), and a delayed onset of postchemotherapy nausea and vomiting (PCNV) compared to the patients who developed neither ANV nor PCNV. However, when patients who did not develop PCNV were excluded from the analysis, the difference between the ANV and non-ANV patients remained significant only for postchemotherapy dizziness/lightheadedness (p less than 0.05). In an attempt to identify a group of variables that better predict the development of ANV, we analyzed the data for combinations of variables. Two indices were found to correctly classify ANV and non-ANV patients 71% of the time (p less than 0.05). Index A refers to the presence of at least two of the following variables, pretreatment anxiety, posttreatment dizziness/lightheadedness, and latency of PCNV. Index B refers to the presence of at least two of the following variables: pretreatment anxiety, severity of nausea, and severity of vomiting. The identification of characteristics associated with the development of ANV could lead to new intervention strategies.

Affect↗
PubMed1995

Clinical efficacy of lorazepam in prophylaxis of anticipatory, acute, and delayed nausea and vomiting induced by high doses of cisplatin. A prospective randomized trial.

Nausea and vomiting are extremely common and most distressing side effects of high-dose cisplatin therapy. Cisplatin induces anticipatory and acute, as well as, delayed emesis. High doses of metoclopramide can effectively decrease the intensity of these symptoms in up to 70% of cases. Several agents, including dexamethasone and antihistamines have been demonstrated to either increase the efficacy of metoclopramide or decrease the side effects. Lorazepam, a benzodiazepine, has both antiemetic and anxiolytic properties. It can be useful as an adjunct to metoclopramide-based therapy. We conducted a randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of lorazepam in managing anticipatory, acute, and delayed emesis induced by high doses of cisplatin. A total of 180 events involving cisplatin administration (100 mg/m2 as a 24-hour continuous infusion) were randomized to receive metoclopramide along with dexamethasone and clemastine with and without lorazepam. Categorical scales were utilized to document the incidence of nausea and vomiting and side effects related to antiemetic therapy. All episodes are evaluable. Lorazepam significantly reduced the incidence of anticipatory nausea and vomiting (P < .05) as well as acute emesis (P = .05) induced by cisplatin. Delayed emesis was also decreased; however, it was statistically significant on day 3 only (P < .05). Side effects were few except for mild sedation and amnesia, which were significantly more common in those receiving lorazepam (P < .001). We conclude that lorazepam increases the efficacy of metoclopramide against cisplatin-induced anticipatory, acute, and delayed nausea and vomiting. This four-drug regimen may offer one of the best combinations to be utilized in comparative trials against the newly introduced serotonin antagonists.

Adult↗