Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Trials”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 613 records · Page 34Linked to original sources

The Karonga Prevention Trial: a leprosy and tuberculosis vaccine trial in northern Malaŵi. I. Methods of the vaccination phase.

In this report the methods of the Karonga Prevention Trial, a double-blind leprosy and tuberculosis vaccine trial in Karonga District, Northern Malaŵi, are described in detail. During a total population house-to-house survey, which lasted from November 1985 until August 1989, 121,008 people (57,892 males and 63,116 females) were vaccinated. A further 5835 people refused vaccination and 5757 were ineligible for vaccination, 2652 of them because they had a history or signs of leprosy, or because they were suspected to have early leprosy. A total of 66,145 individuals, without evidence of prior BCG vaccination, received one of the following: BCG, BCG + 5 x 10(7) killed Mycobacterium leprae, or BCG + 6 x 10(8) killed M. leprae; 54,863 individuals found with a typical or a doubtful BCG scar received either placebo or BCG, or (from mid-1987 onwards) BCG + 6 x 10(8) killed M. leprae. Side-effects were not looked for systematically, but 4 individuals self-reported with glandular abscesses, 9 with large post-vaccination ulcers (> 25 mm in diameter) and 2 with ulcers which persisted for more than 1 year. BCG vials collected from paraffin refrigerators in the field showed satisfactory concentrations of viable BCG throughout the trial. Post-vaccination skin test (RT23 and M. leprae soluble antigen) results and post-vaccination ulcer rates indicate that few mistakes were made in the field when recording the vaccine codes.

Adolescent↗

Treatment of septic shock with human monoclonal antibody HA-1A. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. CHESS Trial Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of 100 mg of HA-1A and placebo in reducing the 14-day all-cause mortality rate in patients with septic shock and gram-negative bacteremia in the Centocor: HA-1A Efficacy in Septic Shock (CHESS) trial, and to assess the safety of 100 mg of HA-1A given to patients with septic shock who did not have gram-negative bacteremia. DESIGN: Large, simple, group-sequential, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: 603 investigators at 513 community and university-affiliated hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS: Within 6 hours before enrollment, the patients had been in shock with a systolic blood pressure of less than 90 mm Hg after adequate fluid challenge or had received vasopressors to maintain blood pressure. These episodes of shock began within 24 hours of enrollment. A presumptive clinical diagnosis of gram-negative infection as the cause of the shock episode and a commitment from the patients' physicians to provide full supportive care were required. MEASUREMENTS: Blood cultures were obtained within 48 hours of enrollment, and death at day 14 after treatment was recorded. Adverse events occurring within 14 days after enrollment were also tabulated. RESULTS: 2199 patients were enrolled; 621 (28.2%) met all enrollment criteria, received HA-1A or placebo, and had confirmed gram-negative bacteremia. Mortality rates in this group were as follows: placebo, 32% (95 and HA-1A, 33% (109 of 328) (P = 0.864, Fisher exact test, two-tailed; 95% CI for the difference, -6.2% to 8.6%). Mortality rates in the patients without gram-negative bacteremia were as follows: placebo, 37% (292 of 793) and HA-1A, 41% (318 of 785) (P = 0.073, Fisher exact test, one-tailed; CI, -0.8% to 8.8%). CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, HA-1A was not effective in reducing the 14-day mortality rate in patients with gram-negative bacteremia and septic shock. These data do not support using septic shock as an indication for HA-1A treatment. If HA-1A is effective in reducing the mortality rate in patients dying from endotoxemia, these patients must be identified using other treatment criteria.

Adult↗

Some random-effects models for the analysis of matched-cluster randomised trials: application to the Swedish two-county trial of breast-cancer screening.

BACKGROUND: In the Swedish two-county trial women aged 40-74 years from two counties in Sweden were randomised to invitation to mammographic screening for breast cancer. METHODS: This paper uses random effects logistic regression models to analyse recent data from the trial. The analysis accounts for the structure of the trial, where small geographical units are randomised within larger geographical strata (blocks of two or three small units that are socio-economically similar). RESULTS: Fixed effects and a variety of random effects models show a strong degree of agreement and yield a significant 29% or 30% reduction in breast-cancer mortality. DISCUSSION: Fixed effects and random effects models agree for this example, because heterogeneity both between strata and within strata between clusters is small and because the effect of treatment does not vary much in different strata.

Adult↗

National Institute of Mental Health Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE): Alzheimer disease trial methodology.

The authors describe the development of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) protocol for Alzheimer disease (AD), a trial developed in collaboration with the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), assessing the effectiveness of atypical antipsychotics for psychosis and agitation occurring in AD outpatients. They provide an overview of the methodology utilized in the trial as well as the clinical-outcomes and effectiveness measures that were implemented.

Aged↗

Baseline characteristics and the effect of selenium supplementation on cancer incidence in a randomized clinical trial: a summary report of the Nutritional Prevention of Cancer Trial.

The Nutritional Prevention of Cancer Trial was a randomized, clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of selenium as selenized yeast (200 microg daily) in preventing the recurrence of nonmelanoma skin cancer among 1312 residents of the Eastern United States. Original secondary analyses through December 31, 1993 showed striking inverse associations between treatment and the incidence of total [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.46-0.82], lung, prostate, and colorectal cancer and total cancer mortality. This report presents results through February 1, 1996, the end of blinded treatment. Effect modification by baseline characteristics is also evaluated. The effects of treatment overall and within subgroups of baseline age, gender, smoking status, and plasma selenium were examined using incidence rate ratios and Cox proportional hazards models. Selenium supplementation reduced total (HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.58-0.97) and prostate (HR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.28-0.80) cancer incidence but was not significantly associated with lung (HR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.44-1.24) and colorectal (HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.21-1.02) cancer incidence. The effects of treatment on other site-specific cancers are also described. The protective effect of selenium was confined to males (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.50-0.89) and was most pronounced in former smokers. Participants with baseline plasma selenium concentrations in the lowest two tertiles (<121.6 ng/ml) experienced reductions in total cancer incidence, whereas those in the highest tertile showed an elevated incidence (HR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.77-1.86). The Nutritional Prevention of Cancer trial continues to show a protective effect of selenium on cancer incidence, although not all site-specific cancers exhibited a reduction in incidence. This treatment effect was restricted to males and to those with lower baseline plasma selenium concentrations.

Age Distribution↗

Steroids in chronic B-hepatitis. A randomized, double-blind, multinational trial on the effect of low-dose, long-term treatment on survival. A trial group of the European Association for the Study of the Liver.

The effect of long-term, low-dose prednisolone treatment on the survival of patients with chronic B-hepatitis was studied in a randomized, double-blind multicentre trial. Twenty-two centres from 11 European countries included 99 patients in the trial. Survival analysis showed 2.9 (95% confidence limit 0.9-9) times greater mortality in the prednisolone than in the placebo group (P = 0.07). In a Cox regression analysis, correcting for the influence of other prognostic factors, the detrimental effect of prednisolone treatment was unchanged. Mortality increased significantly with age, and patients without piece-meal necrosis had 7 times higher mortality than those with this change on entry to the trial. It is concluded that long-term, low-dose prednisolone treatment is very unlikely to be beneficial, and should be considered harmful in chronic B-hepatitis, particularly in the most severe and advanced cases.

Adolescent↗

Foscarnet-Ganciclovir Cytomegalovirus Retinitis Trial. 4. Visual outcomes. Studies of Ocular Complications of AIDS Research Group in collaboration with the AIDS Clinical Trials Group.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis is the most common intraocular infection in patients with the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) and, untreated, is a blinding disorder. The Foscarnet-Ganciclovir Cytomegalovirus Retinitis Trial is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, unmasked, clinical trial that compared ganciclovir and foscarnet as treatments for CMV retinitis in patients with AIDS. METHODS: Patients with previously untreated CMV retinitis who enrolled in this trial were assigned randomly to treatment with either foscarnet or ganciclovir and followed at regular intervals for visual outcomes, including progression of the retinitis, visual acuity, and visual fields. In October 1991, the treatment protocol was suspended due to a greater mortality in the ganciclovir-assigned group. RESULTS: The efficacy of the two drugs in controlling the CMV retinitis as measured by the time to first progression was similar. The relative risk for progression of the retinitis was 0.97 (ganciclovir versus foscarnet; P = 0.833), and the median time to first progression was 53 days in the foscarnet-assigned patients compared with 47 days in the ganciclovir-assigned patients (P = 0.997), as determined by a masked reading at a central fundus photograph reading center. By 120 days after randomization, progression was observed in 85% of patients in each treatment group. Visual acuity outcomes were similar for both groups; at 6 months after randomization, 88% of the foscarnet-assigned patients and 93% of the ganciclovir-assigned patients had a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better in the better eye (P = 0.325). Visual field scores were similar in the two groups; in all eyes affected with CMV retinitis, there was a mean 29 degrees/month loss of visual field in foscarnet-assigned patients compared with a 31 degrees/month loss in ganciclovir-assigned patients (P = 0.674). CONCLUSION: Although foscarnet was associated with a longer survival than ganciclovir, the two drugs appear equivalent in controlling CMV retinitis and preserving vision.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗

Double-blind trial of intravenous methylprednisolone in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Guillain-Barré Syndrome Steroid Trial Group.

Steroids have been beneficial in the treatment of demyelinating diseases with features similar to those of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). However, steroid treatment of GBS has been disappointing; in an earlier trial oral prednisolone was ineffective, although the dose was low and the sample small. We assessed the benefit of a high-dose steroid regimen in a large sample of patients with GBS in a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial. 242 adult patients were randomised to receive intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) 500 mg (124 patients) or a placebo (118) daily for 5 days. Patients were diagnosed by standard clinical criteria and entered the trial within 15 days of onset of neurological symptoms. All patients were too weak to run. Some patients received plasma exchange depending on the practice of their centre. Disability was graded on a scale from 0 (healthy) to 6 (dead) at intervals for 48 weeks. There was no significant difference in any outcome variable between patients treated with IVMP and those given placebo. The most important outcome was the difference between the groups in disability grade 4 weeks after randomisation, which was only a 0.06 grade (95% Cl -0.23 to 0.36) greater improvement in the IVMP than the placebo group. The 39 patients in the IVMP group who required ventilation did so for a median of 18 days, 9 days fewer than the 44 patients who had a placebo and required ventilation (95% Cl -9.6 to 27.6). Median time to walk unaided was 38 days in the IVMP patients and 50 days in the placebo patients (difference 12 days, (95% Cl -21.3 to 45.3). A short course of high-dose IVMP given early in GBS is ineffective.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) on CD4+ lymphocyte decline in HIV-infected children in a clinical trial of IVIG infection prophylaxis. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Intravenous Immunoglobulin Clinical Trial Study Group.

Our objective was to evaluate the effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) on absolute CD4+ lymphocyte count (CD4+ count) trends in human immunodeficiency virus- (HIV) infected children enrolled in a trial of IVIG for infection prophylaxis. To that end, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, outpatient trial comparing subjects treated with 400 mg per kilogram of IVIG every 28 days with those given 0.1% albumin placebo. CD4+ counts were measured at entry and every 12 weeks. Twenty-eight clinical centers in mainland United States and Puerto Rico participated. Previous reports showed IVIG efficacy for infection prophylaxis in 313 patients with entry CD4+ counts of > or = 0.20 x 10(9)/L (> or = 200/mm3). Two hundred and seventy-seven (89%) of these 313 children had three or more CD4+ counts measured during the trial and were included in evaluation of CD4+ count trends. Rates of CD4+ count decline, as measured by regression slopes, were compared between IVIG and placebo groups using generalized linear models, comparing unadjusted, age-adjusted, and standardized age-adjusted data. Potential covariate effects were assessed by modeling change in CD4+ count in terms of log change between successive measurements. Age-adjusted slope analysis showed slowing of CD4+ count decline by 13.5 cells/mm3 per month in IVIG compared with placebo recipients (95% confidence interval, 3.1-23.9, p = 0.012). Modeling log change between measurements documented a beneficial effect of IVIG that was cumulative over time and independent of other therapies. Occurrence of serious bacterial infection in the interval before CD4+ count measurement or death was independently associated with more rapid CD4+ count decline (p = 0.01 and p = 0.008, respectively). Zidovudine therapy was associated with a transient increase in CD4+ count. Benefits of IVIG include slowing of CD4+ count decline as well as previously reported reductions in serious and minor bacterial and viral infections in subjects with entry CD4+ counts of > or = 0.20 x 10(9)/L. This finding provides corroboration for the hypothesis that immunologic mechanisms contribute to the pathogenesis of CD4+ decline in HIV infection.

Age Factors↗

Epidermoid anal cancer: results from the UKCCCR randomised trial of radiotherapy alone versus radiotherapy, 5-fluorouracil, and mitomycin. UKCCCR Anal Cancer Trial Working Party. UK Co-ordinating Committee on Cancer Research.

BACKGROUND: Non-surgical management of anal cancer by radiotherapy alone or combined with chemotherapy has, in uncontrolled studies, yielded similar local tumour control and survival rates to surgery. However, whether the addition of chemotherapy improves outcome without adding to morbidity is not known. Our trial was designed to compare combined modality therapy (CMT) with radiotherapy alone in patients with epidermoid anal cancer. METHODS: From 856 patients considered for entry to our multicentre trial, 585 patients were randomised to receive initially either 45 Gy radiotherapy in twenty or twenty-five fractions over 4-5 weeks (290 patients) or the same regimen of radiotherapy combined with 5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m2 for 4 days or 750 mg/m2 for 5 days) by continuous infusion during the first and the final weeks of radiotherapy and mitomycin (12 mg/m2) on day 1 of the first course (295 patients). We assessed clinical response 6 weeks after initial treatment: good responders were recommended for boost radiotherapy and poor responders for salvage surgery. The main endpoint was local-failure rate (> or = 6 weeks after initial treatment); secondary endpoints were overall and cause-specific survival. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. FINDINGS: In the radiotherapy and CMT arms, respectively, five and three were ineligible, and six and nine died 6 weeks after initial treatment. After a median follow-up of 42 months (interquartile range 28-62), 164 of 279 (59%) radiotherapy patients had a local failure compared with 101 of 283 (36%) CMT patients. This gave a 46% reduction in the risk of local failure in the patients receiving CMT (relative risk 0.54, 95% CI 0.42-0.69, p < 0.0001). The risk of death from anal cancer was also reduced in the CMT arm (0.71, 0.53-0.95, p = 0.02). There was no overall survival advantage (0.86, 0.67-1.11, p = 0.25). Early morbidity was significantly more frequent in the CMT arm (p = 0.03), but late morbidity occurred at similar rates. INTERPRETATION: Our trial shows that the standard treatment for most patients with epidermoid anal cancer should be a combination of radiotherapy and infused 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin, with surgery reserved for those who fall on this regimen.

Adult↗

Surgical aspects of a randomized trial of defibrillator implantation during coronary artery bypass surgery. The CABG Patch Trial.

BACKGROUND: Whether prophylactic insertion of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) improves the survival of high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is being assessed in the CABG Patch Trial. This report describes the surgical aspects of the study. METHODS AND RESULTS: As of February 28, 1995, 847 patients (1.6% of 54102 screened) were enrolled and eligible for randomization to CABG or CABG plus ICD. Intraoperatively, 56 were eliminated by postenrollment exclusions, 67 were judged too unstable for randomization, and 724 were randomized (80% of the goal of 900). The average preoperative ejection fraction was 0.27 +/- 0.06 (n = 724); left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic pressure averaged 22 +/- 12 mm Hg (n = 548) Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time averaged 108 minutes in control subjects, 126 minutes in the ICD group. After CPB, mechanical support was employed in 23% of patients and inotropic support in 73%; shock occurred in 8% and deep sternal wound infection in 1.3%. The surgical mortality was 6%; median length of stay was 8 days. Compared with randomized patients, patients whom surgeons judged too unstable to randomize were distinguished by statistically significant increases in mechanical support after CPB (51% versus 23%, P < .05) and postoperative shock (19% versus 8%, P < .05). Also, surgical mortality was greater (9% versus 6%) but was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The initial phases of the CABG Patch Trial have been conducted with acceptable surgical mortality, morbidity, and length of stay. Surgical exclusion of some patients from randomization has been corroborated by data indicating hemodynamic instability. This trial will provide information about the risks and outcome of CABG surgery in patients with impaired LV function.

Aged↗

Dose-ranging trial of enoxaparin for unstable angina: results of TIMI 11A. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 11A Trial Investigators.

OBJECTIVES: The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 11A trial compared the safety and tolerability of two weight-adjusted regimens of subcutaneous injections of enoxaparin, a low molecular weight heparin, in patients with unstable angina/non-Q wave myocardial infarction (NQMI). BACKGROUND: The optimal dose of enoxaparin in patients with arterial disorders has not been established. METHODS: Patients with unstable angina/NQMI were treated over a 14-day period in an open label dose-ranging trial. During the in-hospital phase, patients received either 1.25 mg/kg body weight (dose tier 1) or 1.0 mg/kg (dose tier 2) of enoxaparin subcutaneously every 12 h. A fixed dose of either 60 mg (body weight > or = 65 kg) or 40 mg (body weight < 65 kg) was administered subcutaneously every 12 h after hospital discharge. RESULTS: In an initial cohort of 321 patients (dose tier 1), the rate of major bleeding through 14 days was 6.5% and occurred predominantly at instrumented sites. In a second cohort of 309 patients (dose tier 2), the rate of major hemorrhage was reduced to 1.9%. In both dose tiers, only 3% to 5% of patients withdrew consent for subcutaneous injections during the home treatment phase. Through 14 days, the incidence of death, recurrent myocardial infarction or recurrent ischemia requiring revascularization was 5.6% in dose tier 1 and 5.2% in dose tier 2. CONCLUSIONS: An acute phase regimen of enoxaparin (1.0 mg/kg every 12 h) is associated with an acceptable rate of major hemorrhage during the in-hospital phase. There is a high rate of patient compliance during the home treatment phase. A Phase III trial is now underway to test the benefits of uninterrupted treatment with enoxaparin during both the in-hospital and outpatient treatment phases.

Aged↗

A cross sectional assessment of health status instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis participating in a clinical trial. Minocycline in Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial Group.

OBJECTIVE: To (1) validate the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) as a generic functional health status measure in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA); and (2) assess correlations between the SF-36 and other outcome measures used in the Minocycline in Rheumatoid Arthritis (MIRA) Trial. METHODS: We conducted a cross sectional analysis of the final visit outcome measures from the 48 week, multicenter, placebo controlled, double blind MIRA trial. Multitrait scaling analyses assessed convergent and discriminant validity and internal consistency reliability of the SF-36 in the study patients. Responses to comparable items on the SF-36 and modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (M-HAQ) regarding physical functioning were compared and questions from both instruments were also compared to other RA outcome measures. RESULTS: In patients with RA, the SF-36 had high internal consistency and reliability, high discriminant and high convergent validity. Moderate correlations were observed (r = -0.46 to -0.61, p < 0.01 in each case) for comparable items on the SF-36 and M-HAQ regarding dressing, walking, and bending. Joint tenderness score correlations with items on the M-HAQ and SF-36, and joint tenderness score correlations with the SF-36 scales were higher than for joint swelling scores. Physician and patient global assessments were most highly correlated (r = 0.58 and 0.66; p < 0.01, respectively) with the SF-36 bodily pain item. CONCLUSION: The SF-36 is a valid instrument for this RA population. The SF-36 correlates with the M-HAQ and the physician and patient global assessments. The usefulness of the SF-36 in measuring change in RA clinical trials requires testing in longitudinal studies.

Adult↗

Strategies for recruitment to a population-based lung cancer prevention trial: the CARET experience with heavy smokers. Beta-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial.

The Beta-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial tested the effect of the combination of beta-carotene (30 mg) and retinyl palmitate (25,000 units) daily on the incidence of lung cancer in high-risk individuals. In study centers located in Seattle, WA; Portland, OR; and Irvine, CA, we recruited current and recent ex-cigarette smokers, aged 50-69 years. Our primary method of recruitment was by mailing study information and eligibility questionnaires to age-selected health insurance subscribers. A total of 1,216,549 subscriber households were contacted, which resulted in 16,449 enrollments and 12,184 randomizations. Other methods of recruitment yielded 1421 enrollments and 1002 randomizations. Seventy-four % of those participants who enrolled in the 3-month placebo run-in were randomized. The major reasons for nonrandomization once subjects were enrolled were: becoming ineligible (13%), concern about or development of side effects attributed to the study vitamins (18%), loss of interest or being too busy (23%), and not showing up at the appointed time or not willing to come to the study center (23%). Here, we discuss the reasons for nonparticipation and for subjects leaving the trial prior to randomization and possible modifications of trial design and procedures to address these problems. This recruitment approach provided a constant flow of potentially eligible participants, screened out many ineligible and uninterested persons prior to the scheduling of a study center visit, and ensured randomization of committed participants. A major limitation of this study was that the pool of minorities that was reached was small.

Aged↗

An open design, multicentre, randomized trial of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus stenting, with a heparin-coated stent, of totally occluded coronary arteries: rationale, trial design and baseline patient characteristics. Total Occlusion Study of Canada (TOSCA) Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) of totally occluded coronary arteries is performed in a variety of clinical settings and for a variety of indications. Most commonly it is performed for relief of symptoms of myocardial ischemia. Studies have also suggested that PTCA of occluded arteries beyond the acute phase of myocardial infarction may improve left ventricular function even in the absence of objective evidence of ischemia. One of the major limitations of total occlusion PTCA is a high rate of reocclusion, reported to be as high as 40%. Recently, small studies have suggested that stenting may improve the long term outcome after PTCA of total coronary occlusions. OBJECTIVES: To determine in a prospective, randomized trial whether long term patency and clinical outcome following successful PTCA of a totally occluded coronary can be improved by the use of of a heparin-coated stent. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two strategies once the guide wire had crossed the occluded segment of the target artery: PTCA alone, or PTCA followed by insertion of Palmaz-Shatz heparin-coated stent(s). Randomization was stratified according to duration of the coronary occlusion: six weeks or less, and more than six weeks. The primary end-point is failure of sustained patency (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] flow grade less than 3) at six months. Secondary end-points are change in minimal luminal diameter, target vessel revascularization at one year, cardiovascular events at one year, and change in global and regional left ventricular function. BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS: All 410 patients have been randomly assigned to the PTCA alone (n = 208) or PTCA plus stent (n = 202) group. Mean age was 58 +/- 11 years and 18% were female. Prior myocardial infarction had been documented in 67% of patients. The duration of occlusion was six weeks or less in 40% and more than six weeks in 60% of patients. In 64% of patients TIMI flow was grade 0 and in 36% it was grade 1. STUDY IMPLICATIONS: The trial will demonstrate whether the use of a heparin-bonded stent can improve long term patency and clinical outcome in patients undergoing clinically indicated PTCA of totally occluded coronary arteries. If a significant reduction in reocclusion and clinical events is demonstrated, the Total Occlusion Study of Canada (TOSCA) would offer a more effective long term revascularization strategy in future trials testing the open artery hypothesis.

Aged↗

International randomised controlled trial of acetazolamide and furosemide in posthaemorrhagic ventricular dilatation in infancy. International PHVD Drug Trial Group.

BACKGROUND: Furosemide and acetazolamide are widely used in the treatment of posthaemorrhagic ventricular dilatation (PHVD) in the hope of avoiding the need for surgical management, but this approach has not been evaluated in a controlled trial. This multicentre randomised controlled trial tested the hypothesis that these drugs would reduce the rate of shunt placement and increase disability-free survival at 1 year of age. METHODS: Between 1992 and 1996, 177 infants aged less than 3 months past term, and with ventricular width more than 4 mm above 97th centile after intraventricular haemorrhage, were randomly assigned standard therapy alone or standard therapy plus treatment with acetazolamide (100 mg/kg daily) and furosemide (1 mg/kg daily). A minimisation algorithm ensured balance between groups with respect to both referral centre and the presence of a cerebral parenchymal lesion on cerebral ultrasonography at enrolment. The trial was stopped in September, 1996, because the data showed a clear advantage with standard therapy. FINDINGS: We report outcomes for 151 infants whose expected date of delivery was before the end of 1995, with complete information at 1 year for 129 infants. The median gestational age was 28 weeks, mean birthweight 1299 g, and mean postnatal age at enrolment 25 days. 44% had a parenchymal lesion at randomisation. Death or shunt placement occurred in 49 of 75 infants allocated drugs plus standard therapy, compared with 35 of 76 allocated to standard therapy alone. The relative risk was 1.42 (95% CI 1.06-1.90; p=0.026), which is equivalent to one extra death or shunt placement for every five infants allocated drug therapy. 84% (52/62) of infants assigned drug therapy had died or were disabled or impaired at 1 year, compared with 60% (40/67) of those assigned standard therapy (relative risk 1.40 [1.12-1.76]; p=0.012). INTERPRETATION: These preliminary results suggest that the use of acetazolamide and furosemide in preterm infants with PHVD is associated with a higher rate of shunt placement and increased neurological morbidity, and so cannot be recommended.

Acetazolamide↗

Trials and tribulations: current challenges in conducting clinical trials.

Randomized controlled trials are the gold standard for the evaluation of new therapies and surgical procedures and as such require strict attention to study design and statistical analysis. There are, however, multiple challenges in conducting a well-designed clinical trial. This article describes the difficulties encountered at a single institution participating in a multicenter drug study and reviews the challenges involved in developing a high-quality randomized controlled study.

Acetaminophen↗

The trial of infant response to diphenhydramine: the TIRED study--a randomized, controlled, patient-oriented trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if infants aged 6 to 15 months with frequent parent-reported nighttime awakenings require reduced parental aid during a week of diphenhydramine hydrochloride treatment and 2 and 4 weeks after its discontinuation. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial. SETTING: The study was conducted from May 1, 2004, through May 1, 2005; patients were recruited nationally. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-four participants aged 6 to 15 months. INTERVENTIONS: Placebo or diphenhydramine was administered in infants 30 minutes before anticipated bedtime. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was dichotomous: a parental report of improvement in the number of night awakenings requiring parental assistance during the intervention week, which ended on day 14. Secondary outcomes were improved sleep during the 2 weeks before days 29 and 43, parental overall happiness with sleep, and improved sleep latency. RESULTS: On June 6, 2005, the data safety monitoring board voted unanimously to stop the trial early because of lack of effectiveness of diphenhydramine over placebo. Only 1 of 22 children receiving diphenhydramine showed improvement compared with 3 of 22 receiving placebo. To reach the a priori determined sample size and have a positive outcome (ie, rejecting the null hypothesis), the trial would have needed to enroll 16 more participants in each arm, with 15 of the 16 in the diphenhydramine group and 0 of 16 in the placebo group improving. CONCLUSION: During 1 week of therapy and at follow-up 2 and 4 weeks later, diphenhydramine was no more effective than placebo in reducing nighttime awakening or improving overall parental happiness with sleep for infants.

Diphenhydramine↗