Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Multiple Trauma”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 613 records · Page 34Linked to original sources

On-line quality [corrected] assurance in the initial definitive management of multiple trauma: evaluating system potential.

The TraumAID system has been designed to provide on-line decision support throughout the initial definitive management of injured patients. Here we describe its retrospective evaluation and the use we subsequently made of judges comments on the validation data to evaluate TraumaTIQ, a new critiquing interface for TraumAID, investigating the question of whether, with timely recording of information, a system could produce commentary in line with that of human experts. Our results show that (1) comparable commentary can be produced, and (2) validation studies, which take great time and effort to conduct, can produce useful data beyond their original design goals.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗

Validating the Functional Capacity Index as a measure of outcome following blunt multiple trauma.

BACKGROUND: The validity of the Functional Capacity Index (FCI) is evaluated by examining its distributional characteristics, its correlation with other well-known measures of outcome and its ability to discriminate among persons with injuries of varying type and severity. METHODS: A telephone survey which included the FCI and the SF-36 was administered 1 year post-injury to 1240 blunt trauma patients discharged from 12 trauma centers. A subsample of 656 patients also completed the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) by mail. RESULTS: FCI scores correlated well with the physical health subscores of the SIP and SF-36. They also correlated well with self-reported change in health status and return to work. The FCI, when compared to either the SF-36 or the SIP, however, appears to discriminate better among patients according to the presence and severity of head trauma. CONCLUSIONS: While further testing of the FCI is needed, it holds promise as a preference based measure for assessing the physical impact of trauma.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Chest physical therapy to the patient with multiple trauma. Two case studies.

Chest physical therapy is the preferred treatment in the MIEMSS for both preventing and treating pulmonary complications caused by retained secretions. The beneficial results of chest physical therapy in our facility, including improvement in chest roentgenogram appearance, arterial blood gases, and lung compliance, have been documented. The cases presented illustrate the successful use of chest physical therapy despite the presence of severe trauma and possible contraindications. The potential benefits of chest physical therapy may outweigh the existing possible contraindications.

Adult↗

Multiple trauma and zinc metabolism in adult rats.

Zinc metabolism and turnover were studied after oral 65Zn given to 1-year-old rats before acute fracture trauma, after which calcium balance was decreased but still positive, while that of zinc was highly negative due to early increased intestinal excretion and late increased urinary excretion. Decreased serum calcium was related to increased urinary excretion while serum zinc initially seemed to be lowered by a metallothionein-mediated flux into the liver. The intestinal and late urinary losses of zinc would greatly affect the body stores of zinc. The specific activity of 65Zn and the zinc accretion rate were increased in intact rat skeletons. A similar but not so extensive reaction of intact control rats in this study indicates a liability in the homeostasis of zinc for adult rats.

Animals↗

An evaluation of multiple trauma severity indices created by different index development strategies.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of emergency trauma care systems is complicated by the need to adjust for the widely variable case mix found in trauma patient populations. Several strategies have been advanced to construct the severity indices that can control for these population differences. This article describes a validity and reliability comparison of trauma severity indices developed under three different approaches: 1) use of a multi-attribute utility (MAU) model; 2) an actuarial approach relying on empirical data bases; and 3) an "ad hoc" approach. Seven criteria were identified to serve as standards of comparison for four different indices. The study's findings indicate that the index developed using the MAU theory approach associates most closely with physician judgments of trauma severity. When correlated with a morbidity outcome measure, the MAU-based index shows higher levels of agreement than the other indices. The index development approach based on the principles of MAU theory has several advantages and it appears to be a powerful tool in the creation of effective severity indices.

Actuarial Analysis↗

Treatment of reactivated post-traumatic stress disorder. Imaginal exposure in an older adult with multiple traumas.

A single-case analysis was used to assess the effects of imaginal exposure in a 57-year-old woman suffering from current and reactivated post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following a transient ischemic attack. The client's responses to self-reported depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms were repeatedly recorded during four phases: (a) initial psychotherapy, (b) imaginal exposure, (c) skill generalization, and (d) fading of treatment. In addition to dramatic reduction in levels of depression and anxiety, results showed a significant improvement in PTSD symptoms relating to recent and remote traumatic experiences. Improvements were maintained approximately 16 months after imaginal exposure ended, despite ongoing external stressors.

Adolescent↗