Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “INDEXING”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 613 records · Page 34Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Pretreatment prognostic factors for survival in small-cell lung cancer: a new prognostic index and validation of three known prognostic indices on 341 patients.

AIMS: a) To identify which pretreatment clinical or blood parameters were predictive of patients survival in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in a retrospective analysis. b) To validate three known prognostic indices: Royal Marsden Model (index 1), London Group (index 2) and Manchester Score (index 3). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1981 to 1993, 341 SCLC patients were treated with chemotherapy with or without surgery or radiotherapy. Univariate and multiple regression analyses of survival were performed and the feasibility of these models was explored, index 1: Karnofsky index, albumin, sodium and alkaline phosphatase; index 2: ECOG performance status (PS), albumin and alanine transaminase; and index 3; lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), disease extent, sodium, Karnofsky index, alkaline phosphatase and bicarbonate. RESULTS: Significant prognostic factors for survival after univariate and multiple regression analysis were: disease extent, PS, creatine kinase, neutrophilia, LDH, hypoalbuminemia, hyperglycemia and bicarbonate. A new prognostic index was performed that included LDH, hypoalbuminemia, neutrophilia, disease extent and PS. It defined three prognostic groups (PG). Median survival and two-year survival for these PG were 12.3, 8 and 3.4 months and 16.5%, 2.3% and 0%, respectively. The following PG were identified after application of the three models proposed: Index 1 identified two PG with 0% and 16.6% two-year survival (P < 0.001); index 2 detected three PG with 0%, 5% and 15.7% two-year survival (P < 0.001) and index 3 detected three PG with 0%, 2.5% and 16.2% two-year survivals, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A new prognostic index is proposed allowing identification of three different PG. The feasibility of three known prognostic models was validated and demonstrated. Variables other than disease extent or PS (albumin or LDH) should be taken into account in designing future clinical trials.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

A comparison of the reliability and validity of 3 occlusal indexes of orthodontic treatment need.

Several occlusal indexes are currently used to ascertain eligibility for orthodontic treatment. A comparison of 3 indexes of orthodontic treatment need was made with the consensus opinion of a panel of 15 experienced orthodontists. Sets of study casts (170) representing the full spectrum of malocclusions were selected. An examiner, calibrated in the Dental Aesthetic Index, the Handicapping Labiolingual Deviation with the California Modification, and the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need, scored the casts. The panel of orthodontists individually rated the same casts for their degree of orthodontic treatment need. The mean rating of the panel on the need for treatment was used as the gold standard for evaluating the validity of the indexes. Intrarater and interrater reliability was high (kappa > 0.8). Overall accuracy of the indexes, as reflected in area under receiver-operating characteristic curves, was also high: Dental Aesthetic Index, 95%; Handicapping Labiolingual Deviation with the California Modification, 94%; and Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need, 98%. Cutoff points for the indexes that resulted in the closest agreement with the gold standard differed from the published cutoff points for the indexes. The indexes appear to be valid measures of treatment need as perceived by orthodontists. The published cutoff points for the indexes were more conservative in assigning patients for treatment than a panel of orthodontists. However, adjusting the cutoff points moved all 3 indexes into close agreement with the experts.

California↗
PubMed2004

Body mass index and blood pressure influences on left ventricular mass and geometry in African Americans: The Atherosclerotic Risk In Communities (ARIC) Study.

A unique interaction between the influences of body mass index and blood pressure on left ventricular mass index and geometry may contribute to the higher prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy in African Americans. This cross-sectional study assessed separate and joint influences of body mass index and blood pressure on left ventricular mass index and geometry in 1729 African American participants of the Atherosclerotic Risk in Communities Study. The association between both left ventricular mass index and relative wall thickness and body mass index in each blood pressure category and between these variables and blood pressure in each body mass index category was assessed adjusting for age, diabetes status, hypertension medication, and smoking status. We found that left ventricular hypertrophy and concentric geometry were highly prevalent and that body mass index and blood pressure were independently associated with left ventricular mass index. The adjusted association between blood pressure and left ventricular mass index was stronger with higher body mass index categories; however, there was no significant interaction suggesting merely an additive relationship (not synergistic/multiplicative as tested for in the interaction analysis). Although relative wall thickness was greater with higher categories of body mass index and blood pressure, the mean difference in relative wall thickness between body mass index and blood pressure categories was not statistically significant. The effect on left ventricular geometry as measured by relative wall thickness supports the theory that there is a pathophysiological component in the mechanism of hypertrophy.

Black or African American↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Improving the accuracy of severity indexes: exceptions to the rules.

This study explores the difference between additive and non-additive indexes in measuring the severity of myocardial infarction. It shows, as an example, the fallacy of adding severity scores in a straightforward manner. An additive severity index was constructed from the judgments of seven experts. The experts also identified several exceptions to the additive index. The study used the exceptions to modify the additive index and produce a non-additive severity index. The non-additive severity index explained 36% more of the variance in the severity judgments made by five physicians and two nurses on 50 hypothetical cases than the additive index did. In addition, the non-additive index was 3% more accurate in predicting in-hospital mortality of 7,500 patients with myocardial infarction. When the study reduced the noise in the data by ignoring 1,200 rare cases in which stable estimates of mortality rate were unavailable, the prediction of the non-additive index was 13% more accurate than that of the additive index. Statistical tests showed that the differences between the additive and the non-additive indexes were significant at an alpha level below 1%. The practical implications of non-additive severity indexes are discussed. Researchers and physicians who assess the severity of myocardial infarction should systematically explore exceptions that may improve the accuracy of prediction of an additive index.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗
PubMed2005

[Anthropometric indexes of obesity as an instrument of screening for high coronary risk in adults in the city of Salvador--Bahia].

OBJECTIVE: To compare some anthropometric indexes of obesity and identify among them which one best discriminates the high coronary risk (HCR). METHODS: A cross-section study, with sample consisting of 968 adults, between 30 and 74 years old, being 391 (40.4%) men. Many Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were obtained and compared to areas under them among the conicity index (C index), body mass index (BMI), waist-hip circumference ratio (WHCR), waist circumference (WC) and HCR. The sensitivity and specificity to identify and compare the best cut-off point among the many indexes of obesity to discriminate the HCR were also identified. A confidence interval of 95% was used. RESULTS: The largest area under ROC curve was found between the C index and the HCR, in individuals of male sex, 0.80 (0.74-0.85), significantly differing from the other indexes of obesity. In women, the largest area found under the ROC curve was 0.76 (0.71-0.81), being equal between C, WHCR and HCR indexes. CONCLUSION: Those results show that C and WHCR indexes are the best indexes of obesity to discriminate HCR. WC has intermediate discriminatory power and the BMI was the least suitable anthropometric index of obesity to discriminate HCR. Those data suggest that the indexes of abdominal obesity are better to discriminate HCR than the indexes of general obesity.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

[Comorbidity indexes: review of the literature and application to studies of elderly population].

BACKGROUND: Older patients often suffer concomitant chronic diseases in addition to various health disorders. When attempting to study one of these diseases, it is necessary to consider the complexity of the patient's health status. Comorbidity is a cause of confusion, especially for elderly patients with multiple diseases. Comorbidity indexes have been developed in order to measure this complexity. METHODS: We focused this article on a review of the literature in order to identify and examine the validity of comorbidity indexes applied to the elderly population. RESULTS: Five indexes have been used to measure comorbidity in patient populations with complex health situations: the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS), the Kaplan-Feinstein index, the Charlson index, the Index of Coexistent Disease (ICED), and the Total Illness Burden Index (TIBI). Each of these indexes included a series of domains which vary according to the authors'view of comorbidity. These indexes were validated under different conditions with similar targets. Their validation fields limited their use and extrapolation of results. Only the CIRS, the Charlson index, the Kaplan-Feinstein index and the ICED were validated and applied to old patients. However, the Charlson index was found to be limited in recording the entirety of the old patients'pathologies, and in patients with cognitive deficits, only CIRS appeared to be sufficiently trustworthy because it allows a comprehensive recording of all the comorbid disease from clinical examination and medical file data. CONCLUSION: When studying chronic disease states in frail elderly patients, it is essential to consider comorbidity using standard validated indexes in order to get a comprehensive assessment of the patient's situation and avoid neglecting diseases and handicaps. Further studies are necessary to develop and validate tools specifically adapted to the elderly population.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1997

A simple assessment of bone quality prior to hip arthroplasty: cortical index revisited.

OBJECTIVE: To determine from routine clinical radiographs the diversity of cortical bone structural quality, i.e. the cortical index, of the proximal femur in 117 hips prior to hip arthroplasty and to evaluate its variance associated with patient demographic variables (gender, age at the time of surgery, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), and preoperative diagnosis). DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted using preoperative anteroposterior radiographs of the hip from 110 consecutive patients with 117 hip arthroplasty procedures, in which the patients at the time of surgery had an average age of 69.9 years (range, 19 to 92 years). The primary diagnosis leading to hip surgery was either degenerative joint disease (68 hips) or femoral neck fracture (49 hips). The cortical index, as a measure of cortical bone structural quality, was determined by one experienced reader for the proximal femur of each hip from conventional preoperative anteroposterior radiographs. Correlation analysis was performed between the cortical index and patient demographic variables to assess factors associated with the cortical index. RESULTS: For the entire cohort the average femoral cortical index was 47.9% (range, 25.8% to 64.8%). The hips in female patients had a lower average cortical index than in male patients (mean value of 46.9% and 50.0% respectively). Statistical analysis demonstrated highest significant positive correlation between cortical index and BMI (r = +.441, p < 0.0001) and with body weight (r = +0.396, p < 0.0001). Significant negative correlation was also found between cortical index and age at the time of hip surgery (r = -0.423, p < 0.0001). Significant differences were found between the cortical index and preoperative diagnosis with lower values among the hips diagnosed with femoral neck fractures (mean value, 43.9%) compared to hips with degenerative joint disease (mean value, 50.9%). CONCLUSION: A simple radiogrammetric parameter obtained from routine radiographs, i.e. the femoral cortical index, was found to demonstrate diversity of cortical bone structural quality among patients prior to hip arthroplasty. The cortical index decreased with older patients and increased with heavier (weight) and obese (BMI) patients. It was significantly lower among the hips with femoral neck fractures in patients who were predominantly fragile older females with lower body mass index, which would corroborate published studies associating lower bone mass with risk of hip fracture.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

The des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin index is a new prognostic indicator for hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) has been reported to be an important prognostic factor in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently, a monoclonal antibody, 19B7, which recognizes the Gla domain of DCP, has been identified. The 19B7 antibody recognizes an epitope different from that recognized by MU-3, which is another antibody against DCP. In this study, the authors investigated the measurement of DCP using the antibodies MU-3 and 19B7, respectively, as a prognostic factor for patients with HCC who had solitary, small tumors and or Child Stage A HCC. METHODS: One hundred four patients with HCC who had solitary, small tumors or Child Stage A tumors were enrolled in the study between 1991 and 2001. All patients were treated and were followed for a mean of 3.2 years. The authors analyzed the correlation between the DCP Index (DCP measured by MU-3 and DCP measured by 19B7) and patient prognosis. The patients were classified into 3 groups based on their DCP Index: 1) DCP negative (DCP < 40 milli arbitrary unit (mAU)/mL)); 2) low DCP Index (DCP > or = 40 mAU/mL; MU-3:19B7 ratio, < 3.0; and 3) high DCP Index (DCP > or = 40 mAU/mL; MU-3:19B7 ratio, > or = 3.0). RESULTS: The survival rate for patients in the high DCP Index group was lower compared with the survival rate for patients in the DCP-negative group and was significantly lower compared with the survival rate for patients in the low DCP Index group. In a univariate Cox proportional hazards model, the positive factors were high DCP Index and low DCP Index. Among the positive predictive factors that were analyzed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model were age (hazard ratio, 3.27; P = 0.006), low DCP Index (hazard ratio, 2.87; P = 0.012), and high DCP Index (hazard ratio, 12.3; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of patients who had a high DCP Index score was poorer compared with patients who had a low DCP Index score and patients who were classified as DCP negative. The authors concluded that the DCP Index is a prognostic indicator for patients with HCC.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Tei-Index in coronary artery disease--validation in patients with overall cardiac and isolated diastolic dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: The index "isovolumic contraction time and isovolumic relaxation time divided by ejection time" ("Tei-Index") has been demonstrated to provide useful information about disease severity and prognosis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and cardiac amyloidosis. In patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), the diagnostic utility of this index is unclear. We attempted to validate the Tei-Index in CAD patients with overall cardiac or isolated diastolic dysfunction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty subjects were included who underwent left heart catheterization for invasive measurement of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP): 20 symptomatic CAD patients with overall cardiac dysfunction (defined by a LV ejection fraction (EF) < 45% (mean 27 +/- 8%) and a LVEDP > or = 16 mmHg, (mean 22 +/- 6 mmHg), NYHA class 2.7 +/- 0.4, OCD group), 29 symptomatic CAD patients with isolated diastolic dysfunction (defined by an EF > 45% (mean 55 +/- 8%), a normal end-diastolic diameter index (mean 2.8 +/- 0.4 cm/m2) and a LVEDP > or = 16 mmHg (mean 22 +/- 6 mmHg), NYHA class 2.3 +/- 0.4, IDD group) and 11 asymptomatic control subjects (EF 65 +/- 9%, LVEDP 11 +/- 4 mmHg, CON group). After conventional 2-D- and Doppler echocardiographic examination, the Tei-Index was obtained. The Tei-Index was easily and reproducibly measured in all study subjects. In the OCD group, isovolumic contraction time was prolonged and ejection time was shortened in comparison to the CON group, resulting in a significantly increased Tei-Index (0.71 +/- 0.28 vs 0.40 +/- 0.11, p < 0.01). In the IDD group, isovolumic relaxation time was prolonged and isovolumic contraction time was shortened in comparison to controls, resulting in a largely unchanged Tei-Index (0.45 +/- 0.14, p = ns). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for the Tei-Index yielded an area under the curve of 0.92 +/- 0.04 for separating patients with vs without OCD. Using a Tei-Index > 0.49 as a cut-off, OCD patients were identified with a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 86%. CONCLUSION: The Tei-Index is a valid and readily derived indicator of global cardiac dysfunction in CAD patients with impaired systolic and diastolic LV performance. The use of this index seems to be limited in CAD patients with primary diastolic dysfunction.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

The prognostic contribution of estrogen and progesterone receptor status to a modified version of the Nottingham Prognostic Index.

The aim of this study was to test the prognostic contribution of estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptor status to an index consisting of the number of positive lymph nodes, the mean nuclear area of the breast cancer cells (MNA), and tumour diameter. This index is compared with a Danish index, which includes the same factors but uses histological grade instead of MNA. The Danish index has been developed from the Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI). In the present study of 1629 breast cancer patients the Cox proportional hazard method is used to examine the time-dependency of the index, and to test for interaction between the index and the hormone receptors. The index sorts the patients into groups with low, intermediate, and high risk of dying. Logistic regression analysis is used to report the sensitivity and specificity of the index with and without ER and PgR. Our index gave information comparable to that of the Danish group. However, the information given by our index is time-dependent, its strength being weaker after 5-year of follow-up. PgR and ER add information to high risk patients, but only in the first 5-year period. High risk patients with positive hormone receptors have a prognosis similar to intermediate risk ones. PgR increases the ability of the index to predict breast cancer deaths correctly by 5 percent in high risk patients. In conclusion, PgR and ER act differently in groups of patients with different risk levels when time-dependency is considered. This indicates biological differences in subgroups as defined by the index.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗
PubMed2000

Validity and responsiveness of the rivermead mobility index in stroke patients.

The Rivermead Mobility Index is used to measure mobility in patients with head injury or stroke. The purpose of the study was to examine construct validity, predictive validity, and the responsiveness of the Rivermead Mobility Index in stroke patients. Thirty-eight stroke inpatients participated in the study. The Rivermead Mobility Index, the Barthel Index, and the Berg Balance Scale were administered at admission to the rehabilitation ward and at discharge. The results showed that the Rivermead Mobility Index fulfilled the Guttman scaling criteria (coefficients of reproducibility > 0.9, coefficients of scalability > 0.7). The Rivermead Mobility Index scores were highly correlated with the Barthel Index scores (Spearman rs > 0.6) and the Berg Balance Scale scores (Spearman rs > = 0.8, all ps < 0.001). The Rivermead Mobility Index score at admission was closely correlated with the Barthel Index score at discharge (Spearman r = 0.77, p < 0.001). About 76% (29) of the subjects improved by more than 3 Rivermead Mobility Index points (median = 5) during their stay. The relationship between the change in score of the Rivermead Mobility Index and the Barthel Index was fair (Spearman r = 0.6, p < 0.001). These results indicate that the Rivermead Mobility Index is valid and sensitive to change over time. It is therefore a useful scale for the assessment of mobility in stroke patients.

Disability Evaluation↗
PubMed2006

Correlation of the Tei index with left ventricular dilatation and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

The Tei index is an echocardiographic index of combined systolic and diastolic function, calculated as isovolumetric relaxation time plus isovolumetric contraction time divided by ejection time. The aim of this study was to define the correlation of the Tei index with left ventricular dilatation and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). A total of 77 patients (58 men, 19 women) with a mean age of 53 +/- 12 years, who had presented with an AMI in our clinic between June 2001 and February 2002 were compared with a control group of 88 healthy subjects (63 men, 25 women) with a mean age of 55 +/- 6 years. Echocardiographic evaluation was carried out within 24 hours and the third month of AMI, using a 3.5 MHz probe with pulse wave Doppler recordings by the adult cardiac mode of an Acuson C 256 echocardiograph. There were statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in all echocardiographic parameters, except mitral A wave. Thirteen patients died during the follow-up period of 3 months. The Tei index was significantly higher in the patients who died compared with those who survived (0.70 +/- 0.10 versus 0.61 +/- 0.10; P < 0.001). The patients who had heart failure after AMI had a mean Tei index value of 0.76 +/- 0.27, whereas the patients who did not have heart failure after AMI had a significantly lower Tei index value of 0.60 +/- 0.32 (P < 0.05). Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their Tei index. Patients with a > 0.60 Tei index had significantly higher end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes compared to patients with a < 0.60 Tei index (P < 0.001 for both) in the acute phase of AMI. Within 3 months, patients with a Tei index < 0.60 had a significant reduction in end-diastolic volumes (P < 0.01), whereas the end-diastolic volumes did not change significantly in patients with an index > 0.60 (P = 0.19). The Tei index is an important indicator of left ventricular dysfunction and death after AMI. A greater Tei index at the onset of AMI is associated with a higher incidence of subsequent cardiac death, CHF, and progressive LV remodeling.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Genetic evaluation of an index of birth weight and yearling weight to improve efficiency of beef production.

The CGC population is a stabilized composite of 1/2 Red Angus, 1/4 Charolais, and 1/4 Tarentaise germplasm. The objectives of this research were to estimate genetic parameters for weight traits of CGC and to evaluate genetic responses resulting from selection based on the following index: I = 365-d weight 3.2(birth weight). Phenotypes evaluated were birth weight (n = 5,083), 200-d weight (n = 4,902), 365-d weight (n = 4,626), and the index. In addition, there were 1,433 cows with at least one recorded weight, and 4,375 total observations of cow weight collected at the time their calves were weaned. In 1989, a randomly selected control line and a line selected for greater values of the index were established. Average generation intervals were 3.16 +/- 0.04 and 3.90 +/- 0.08 yr in the index and control lines, respectively. The index selection line (n = 950) accumulated approximately 212 kg more selection differential than the control line over three generations (n = 912). Heritability estimates for direct effects were 0.32 +/- 0.04, 0.49 +/- 0.05, 0.49 +/- 0.05, 0.30 +/- 0.04, and 0.70 +/- 0.04 for the index, birth weight, 365-d weight, 200-d weight, and cow weight, respectively. Heritability estimates for maternal effects were 0.05 +/- 0.02, 0.11 +/- 0.03, 0.04 +/- 0.02, and 0.19 +/- 0.04 for the index, birth weight, 365-d weight, and 200-d weight, respectively. In the control line, direct genetic changes for the index and its components were small. For the index selection line, direct genetic changes for the index, birth weight, 365-d weight, 200-d weight, and cow weight were 6.0 +/- 0.3, 0.45 +/- 0.09, 7.74 +/- 0.55, 3.42 +/- 0.25, and 6.3 +/- 0.9 kg/generation, respectively. Maternal genetic changes were generally small for both the control and index selection lines. Thus, selection for the index produced positive correlated responses for direct genetic effects on BW traits at all ages, with only minor effects on maternal genetic effects. Results demonstrate that despite a genetic antagonism that compromises selection response for decreased birth weight and increased postnatal growth, favorable genetic responses can be achieved with the selection index used in this study.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

["Index for rehabilitation eligibility" for screening social insurance workers].

The principle "priority of rehabilitation over early retirement" might be realised by a screening by which employees in need of rehabilitation are detected in time and rehabilitation measures are purposively started. With the "Index of Rehabilitation Need" we continued our efforts to develop an applicable screening tool on an epidemiological basis. To this end (1) longitudinal data were established by repeating an epidemiological survey of a population sample in the Nordenham/Brake region (T0 = 1975/76, T1 = 1992/93); (2) T0-variables were identified which correlated significantly with the events of early retirement and/or rehabilitation in the period of T0 to T1 (98 cases of early retirement/357 controls; 127 cases of rehabilitation/200 controls; 185 cases of early retirement of rehabilitation/270 controls) using bivariate and multivariate regression analysis; (3) significant T0-variables were used to construct a questionnaire index (based on self assessment of symptoms/complaints, consumption of medicaments, smoking, and work load--16 items), a medical examination index (based on clinical/laboratory findings and medical diagnoses--10 items), and an overall index (sum of both indices--26 items); (4) the index values were calculated for cases of early retirement of rehabilitation and controls of the cohort (185/270), for each index significant differences between cases and controls tested, and the screening characteristics of the overall index analysed; (5) possible reasons for incorrect classifications were examined using a subsample of cases and controls (n = 96/78), for which additional data on medical and work history, stressful life events, and attitudes towards rehabilitation had been collected. All indices showed significant differences between cases of early retirement or rehabilitation and controls. These differences proved to be stronger with the questionnaire and overall indices (p < .0000 each) than with the medical examination index (p < .0006). The overall index did not detect 18% of the cases in need of rehabilitation (false negatives). The proportion of the false positives was 14%; sensitivity and specificity amounted to 57% and 76%. The analysis of the subsample revealed only two possible and plausible reasons for incorrect classifications: the time span between the first survey and the year of early retirement as well as injuries. The index detected cases of early retirement or rehabilitation more easily where the time span between T0 and the year of early retirement was shorter. The index cannot detect cases of early retirement and rehabilitation caused by injuries between T0 and T1, since it is based on chronic disorders and stresses to be the reason for both events. With respect to the sensitivity and specificity of the index the relatively long prediction period needs to be taken into consideration--between T0 and the time of the events there could have been a period of up to 17 years. However, the objective of a screening is not to predict the long-term outcome but to preselect persons who are likely to need rehabilitation and should be invited to a socio-medical examination in order to clarify their rehabilitation need and to start appropriate rehabilitation measures. The chance to detect true positive candidates and to exclude false negative candidates is essentially higher when the measurement of the predictors and the examination are carried out at the same time as has been shown in a former study. With regard to further proceedings we suggest to apply the index in a screening and to investigate the cost effectiveness and other aspects of the screening in a demonstration project.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

[Assessment of severity of oral lichen planus using a new clinical index].

AIM: The goal of this study was to develop a clinical index to assess therapy of oral lichen planus (OLP) to be used in comparing the efficacy of two topical glucocorticoids. The clinical severity of non-gingival and gingival lichen planus and their severity from the patients' view were evaluated. DESCRIPTION OF THE INDEX: A clinical index for assessing the severity of oral lichen planus is described with which the clinical forms as well as all the varying combinations of forms can be addressed separately. The clinical classification of OLP into six variants according to Andreasen [1] is the basis of the index. The index provides information about the severity of the disease in single regions and in the patient as a whole. The index is subdivided into a basic index as well as supplementary indices, which are optional. The clinical forms and size of OLP are recorded using the basic index, while various form-specific features such as the intensity of whitish pattern or mucosal erythema can be assessed additionally using the supplementary indices. Non-gingival and gingival lichen planus are assigned with their own indices. An index of subjective symptoms consisting of a visual analogue scale and verbal scales is available for describing patient discomfort. There is also a short form of the index (study-region index/one-region index), whereby only a single selected region is assessed. CONCLUSION: The index presented here is available as a new method of assessing OLP severity, offering both basic and advanced information for use especially in scientific studies of oral lichen planus.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed2003

Evaluation of malignancy using Ki-67 labeling index for gastric stromal tumor.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of malignant potential in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is still problematic. The maximum tumor diameter and the mitotic index are generally used as an index of malignancy of GISTs. The Ki-67 labeling index has recently been used as an index of cell growth, and the prognosis of GISTs was reported to be significantly poor when the value of this index was 10% or higher. METHODS: Clinicopathological and immunohistological factors were analyzed in 15 patients who underwent surgical resection of gastric stromal tumors at our department between April 1997 and July 2002. The patients were divided into "metastasis/recurrence" and "benign" groups. Also, the relationship of changes in the Ki-67 labeling index to the degree of malignancy in recurrent lesions was assessed in an 84-year-old woman who underwent five reoperations because of recurrences in the peritoneum. RESULTS: Significant differences were noted between the metastasis/recurrence and benign groups in relation to the mean maximum tumor diameter (186.7 +/- 80.8 mm vs 41.3 +/- 22.9 mm), mitotic index (88.3 +/- 5.0/50 high-power fields [HPF] vs 3.0 +/- 2.9/50 HPF), and the Ki-67 labeling index (11.4 +/- 2.5% vs 0.01 +/- 0.51%). In the patient who had metastasis to the liver 3.5 years after initial operation and underwent five reoperations before death, the intervals until detection of recurrence tended to be shortened gradually. The Ki-67 labeling index varied with each operation, and tended to be higher at the time of reoperations than at the initial operation. CONCLUSION: The maximum tumor diameter, mitotic index, and Ki-67 labeling index were useful as an index of malignancy for gastric stromal tumor. The efficacy of surgical resection alone may be insufficient in patients with disseminated metastasis to the peritoneum.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Adapting the Charlson Comorbidity Index for use in patients with ESRD.

BACKGROUND: Accurate prediction of survival for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and multiple comorbid conditions is difficult. In nondialysis patients, the Charlson Comorbidity Index has been used to adjust for comorbidity. The purpose of this study is to assess the validity of the Charlson index in incident dialysis patients and modify the index for use specifically in this patient population. METHODS: Subjects included all incident hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients starting dialysis therapy between July 1, 1999, and November 30, 2000. These 237 patients formed a cohort from which new integer weights for Charlson comorbidities were derived using Cox proportional hazards modeling. Performance of the original Charlson index and the new ESRD comorbidity index were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, change in likelihood ratio, and the c statistic. RESULTS: After multivariate analysis and conversion of hazard ratios to index weights, only 6 of the original 18 Charlson variables were assigned the same weight and 6 variables were assigned a weight higher than in the original Charlson index. Using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, we found that both the original Charlson index and the new ESRD comorbidity index were associated with and able to describe a wide range of survival. However, the new study-specific index had better validated performance, indicated by a greater change in the likelihood ratio test and higher c statistic. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the original Charlson index is a valid tool to assess comorbidity and predict survival in patients with ESRD. However, our modified ESRD comorbidity index had slightly better performance characteristics in this population.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Prediction of mortality risk by different methods of indexation for left ventricular mass.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare the predictive value of echocardiographically determined left ventricular hypertrophy on death from all causes and cardiac mortality using various methods of indexation for left ventricular mass. BACKGROUND: Considerable controversy exists regarding the optimal method for indexing left ventricular mass to body size in the clinical setting. METHODS: The study included 988 consecutive patients who had both coronary angiograms and echocardiographic examinations in an inner-city public hospital in Chicago, Illinois. Patients were followed up for a mean of 7 years (range 2 to 11). RESULTS: Various left ventricular mass indexes (e.g., mass indexed for height, height2, height2.13, height2.7, body surface area and body surface area1.5 were highly correlated (r = 0.90 to 0.99). Used as a continuous measure, an increase in any left ventricular mass index was associated with similar risk of death from all causes and cardiac diseases. Although left ventricular hypertrophy assessed by mass indexed for body surface area using the published conventional partition values provided somewhat better prediction, the adjusted relative risk was in general not significantly different from hypertrophy based on other indexes. Patients with left ventricular hypertrophy defined concordantly by indexes based on both body surface area and height (or height2.7) had, by definition, the highest average mass indexes among all groups and experienced as much as a threefold greater risk of death than those without hypertrophy. A small proportion of patients (12%) who were classified into the hypertrophy group by height-based indexes alone, but not by body surface area, had a moderate increase in mass and showed no increase in risk, even though being overweight was extremely prevalent in this group. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the high correlation among various body size indexes, left ventricular hypertrophy, defined by different indexes for left ventricular mass, similarly confers increased risk of mortality in patients with or without coronary artery disease.

Body Constitution↗