Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Filgrastim”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 613 records · Page 34Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

The safety of full-dose chemotherapy with secondary prophylactic granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) following a prior cycle with febrile neutropenia.

Secondary prophylactic administration of recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) following an episode of febrile neutropenia is recommended if maintenance of dose-intensity is desired. This policy was adopted in our center in patients treated with an intent for cure or durable complete response. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of this policy. Patients in whom neutropenia was associated with a life-threatening infection and those who developed prolonged myelosuppression were excluded. Fifty-one patients who developed febrile neutropenia that required intravenous antibiotics following moderately myelotoxic chemotherapy were included. These patients received the next cycle of the same chemotherapy regime without dose modification but with the support of filgrastim (300 or 480 mg/d sc for at least 10 consecutive days). Diagnoses included lymphoma (n = 19), breast cancer (n = 15), germ cell tumor (n = 7), small-cell lung cancer (n = 5), and other solid tumors (n = 5). The incidence of febrile neutropenia during the first cycle given with filgrastim support (N1) was 8/51 (16%). Intravenous antibiotics were required for 3-7 d (median, 4.5 d). During the following cycle (N2), febrile neutropenia developed in 4/41 (10%) patients. Intravenous antibiotics were given for 2, 4, 5, and 7 d. Other dose-limiting toxicities developed in 1/51 patients who received N1 and in 1/41 patients who received N2. There was no drug-related death associated with either cycle. In conclusion, a policy of full-dose chemotherapy with secondary G-CSF support in patients who develop febrile neutropenia following moderately myelotoxic chemotherapy is relatively safe and feasible.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Lenograstim: an update of its pharmacological properties and use in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and related clinical settings.

UNLABELLED: Lenograstim is the glycosylated recombinant form of human granulocyte colony stimulating factor. The drug is used to reduce the risk of life-threatening infection in patients with neutropenia, particularly after cytotoxic chemotherapy. Lenograstim accelerates neutrophil recovery significantly after chemotherapy, with beneficial effects on clinical end-points such as incidence of laboratory-confirmed infection and length of hospital stay. Chemotherapy dose intensity has also been increased in patients receiving lenograstim, notably those with breast or small cell lung cancer, although improvements in tumour response and survival have not been demonstrated. Lenograstim also assists neutrophil recovery in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation, and stimulates the production of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) for autologous transfusion after aggressive chemotherapy. Lenograstim also mobilises CD34+ cells more efficiently in unit dose terms than filgrastim and has been used successfully to mobilise PBSCs from healthy donors for allogeneic transplantation. Randomised trials have shown increases in rates of disease remission after lenograstim therapy in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia, with no evidence of stimulation of malignant blasts. The drug has also shown potential in the mobilisation of nonmalignant PBSCs for autotransplantation in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. Other studies show efficacy of lenograstim in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, aplastic anaemia, in children with severe chronic neutropenia and in the reversal of neutropenia related to antiviral therapy in patients with AIDS, although data are not extensive. Cost analyses of lenograstim have been carried out from a hospital perspective, although results have been inconclusive. Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit data are lacking at present. Lenograstim is well tolerated, with bone pain and injection site reactions being reported most frequently in clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Lenograstim has been confirmed as a valuable adjunct to minimise the haematological toxicity of myelosuppressive chemotherapy in patients with malignant disease. The drug also enhances neutrophil recovery in patients undergoing stem cell rescue, and assists PBSC mobilisation. Data indicate clinical benefit with lenograstim in myeloid disorders, with no evidence of malignant blast cell proliferation. Further studies are required to assess more fully the pharmacoeconomic implications of the use of lenograstim and other recombinant growth factors, to provide more data on the efficacy of the drug in the management of disease-related neutropenia, and to clarify fully its position relative to filgrastim.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗
PubMed2000

Docetaxel in combination with platinum compounds for non small-cell lung cancer.

Assessing the combination of docetaxel with cisplatin or carboplatin was based on their activity as single agents, their nonoverlapping toxicity profiles, and their lack of cross-resistance. Phase I studies of docetaxel in combination with cisplatin established that 75 mg/m2 of each agent could be administered with reasonable safety and appeared to be active in non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated the docetaxel/cisplatin combination in patients with advanced NSCLC. The response rate was 32%, and the median survival was 11.5 months. Efficacy was comparable to that observed in the Australian and French trials with the same combination. This is now being evaluated further in two large randomized trials for patients with advanced NSCLC and has been incorporated into the combined modality programs for early-stage disease. Carboplatin, devoid of the nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity associated with the parent cis-platin, was then combined with docetaxel. The recommended dose of docetaxel for further evaluation in combination with carboplatin (AUC=6 mg/mL.min) was 90 mg/m2 with filgrastim support and 80 mg/m2 without filgrastim support. Our phase II trial of the combination of docetaxel and carboplatin in advanced NSCLC demonstrated an overall response rate of 36%; median survival was 13.9 months, and 1-year survival was 52%. Comparable activity has been seen by other investigators, and the regimen is being evaluated in two randomized trials. The combination of docetaxel with either of the two platinum agents has reasonable activity in NSCLC, though the carboplatin/docetaxel doublet appears to have a better therapeutic index.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2001

[Induction of psoriasis by human recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor in a patient with small cell lung cancer].

A 70-year-old man with small cell lung cancer was admitted to our hospital. He received chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin plus etoposide with concurrent chest irradiation. Because the patient had leukocytopenia after the first course of chemotherapy, he was treated subcutaneously with filgrastim (human recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor, G-CSF). Three days later, he developed psoriasiform skin eruptions mainly on the surface of the chest radiation field. When filgrastim was replaced with lenograstim (G-CSF), the skin lesions improved. But, after a second course of chemotherapy, lenograstim caused generalized psoriasiform eruptions. The patient had no previous history of psoriasis or any pre-existing skin disease. A skin biopsy revealed a Munro microabscess and spongiform pustules of Kogoj, which are the findings characteristic of the pathology of psoriasis. The MEDLINE report search has revealed, this is the first report of induction of psoriasis by G-CSF in a patient with small cell lung cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Sequencing topotecan and etoposide plus cisplatin to overcome topoisomerase I and II resistance: a pharmacodynamically based Phase I trial.

PURPOSE: Resistance to topoisomerase (TOP) 1 and 2 inhibitors is a potentially important reason for treatment failure, and may be related, in part, to a down-regulation of the specific TOP target. Investigators in our laboratories previously noted such a down-regulation of the target, along with a reciprocal up-regulation of the alternate TOP. Therefore, sequencing TOP inhibitors may provide a means for overcoming resistance to the TOP I and II inhibitors. Furthermore, point mutations in TOP I, which confer resistance to TOP I inhibitors, were associated with collateral sensitivity to cisplatin. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A dose escalating Phase I trial of topotecan (at doses of 0.75 to 1.0 mg/m(2)/day) on days 1 to 3 with etoposide (70-80 mg/m(2)/day) and cisplatin (20-25 mg/m(2)/day) on days 8 to 10. The timing of the drug sequence was based on the prior Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of camptothecin and etoposide, and the level of the TOP targets in peripheral blood monocytes. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (7 males and 8 females) received 40 courses of therapy across three dose levels. The median age was 56 (range, 39-77), and the median performance status was 1 (range, 0-2). The diagnoses included: non-small cell lung cancer (7), head and neck cancer (2), cancer of unknown primary (2), and 1 each of ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, gastric cancer, and renal cancer. Level 1 (topotecan 1.0 mg/m(2)/day; etoposide 80 mg/m(2)/day; and cisplatin 25 mg/m(2)/day) produced severe and prolonged febrile neutropenia in the first patient treated, and the subsequent patients were then entered onto a reduced dose level (cohort 2: topotecan 0.75 mg/m(2)/day; etoposide 70 mg/m(2)/day; and cisplatin 20 mg/m(2)/day). Three of 6 patients on cohort 2 experienced grade IV neutropenia >5 days, and a decision was then made to add filgrastim at 5 micro g/kg rather than additionally reduce the dosages (cohort 3). Eight patients were then treated on cohort 3, and 1 of the 8 patients experienced a grade 4 neutropenia. Thus, cohort level three was considered the recommended dose for Phase II studies. Twelve of the 15 patients had disease assessable for response to therapy. Seven achieved stable disease for >/==" BORDER="0">2 months, whereas 5 showed continued progression of their disease. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that sequencing TOP 1 and 2 inhibitors is feasible, and topotecan 0.75 mg/m(2)/day days 1-3; etoposide 70 mg/m(2)/day days 8-10; and cisplatin 20 mg/m(2)/day days 8-10 with filgrastim at 5 micro g/kg is an appropriate dose and schedule to test the concept of modulating TOP levels by sequencing the administration of the respective TOP inhibitors.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Gateways to clinical trials.

Gateways to Clinical Trials is a guide to the most recent clinical trials in current literature and congresses. The data in the following tables have been retrieved from the Clinical Trials Knowledge Area of Prous Science Integrity, the drug discovery and development portal, http://integrity.prous.com. This issue focuses on the following selection of drugs: Abiraterone acetate, acyline, adalimumab, adenosine triphosphate, AEE-788, AIDSVAX gp120 B/B, AK-602, alefacept, alemtuzumab, alendronic acid sodium salt, alicaforsen sodium, alprazolam, amdoxovir, AMG-162, aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride, aminolevulinic acid methyl ester, aminophylline hydrate, anakinra, anecortave acetate, anti-CTLA-4 MAb, APC-8015, aripiprazole, aspirin, atazanavir sulfate, atomoxetine hydrochloride, atorvastatin calcium, atrasentan, AVE-5883, AZD-2171; Betamethasone dipropionate, bevacizumab, bimatoprost, biphasic human insulin (prb), bortezomib, BR-A-657, BRL-55730, budesonide, busulfan; Calcipotriol, calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate, calcium folinate, capecitabine, capravirine, carmustine, caspofungin acetate, cefdinir, certolizumab pegol, CG-53135, chlorambucil, ciclesonide, ciclosporin, cisplatin, clofarabine, clopidogrel hydrogensulfate, clozapine, co-trimoxazole, CP-122721, creatine, CY-2301, cyclophosphamide, cypher, cytarabine, cytolin; D0401, darbepoetin alfa, darifenacin hydrobromide, DASB, desipramine hydrochloride, desloratadine, desvenlafaxine succinate, dexamethasone, didanosine, diquafosol tetrasodium, docetaxel, doxorubicin hydrochloride, drotrecogin alfa (activated), duloxetine hydrochloride, dutasteride; Ecallantide, efalizumab, efavirenz, eletriptan, emtricitabine, enfuvirtide, enoxaparin sodium, estramustine phosphate sodium, etanercept, ethinylestradiol, etonogestrel, etonogestrel/ethinylestradiol, etoposide, exenatide; Famciclovir, fampridine, febuxostat, filgrastim, fludarabine phosphate, fluocinolone acetonide, fluorouracil, fluticasone propionate, fluvastatin sodium, fondaparinux sodium; Gaboxadol, gamma-hydroxybutyrate sodium, gefitinib, gelclair, gemcitabine, gemfibrozil, glibenclamide, glyminox; Haloperidol, heparin sodium, HPV 16/HPV 18 vaccine, human insulin, human insulin; Icatibant, imatinib mesylate, indium 111 (111In) ibritumomab tiuxetan, infliximab, INKP-100, iodine (I131) tositumomab, IoGen, ipratropium bromide, ixabepilone; L-870810, lamivudine, lapatinib, laquinimod, latanoprost, levonorgestrel, licochalcone a, liposomal doxorubicin, lopinavir, lopinavir/ritonavir, lorazepam, lovastatin; Maraviroc, maribavir, matuzumab, MDL-100907, melphalan, methotrexate, methylprednisolone, mitomycin, mitoxantrone hydrochloride, MK-0431, MN-001, MRKAd5 HIV-1 gag/pol/nef, MRKAd5gag, MVA.HIVA, MVA-BN Nef, MVA-Muc1-IL-2, mycophenolate mofetil; Nelfinavir mesilate, nesiritide, NSC-330507; Olanzapine, olmesartan medoxomil, omalizumab, oral insulin, osanetant; PA-457, paclitaxel, paroxetine, paroxetine hydrochloride, PCK-3145, PEG-filgrastim, peginterferon alfa-2a, peginterferon alfa-2b, perillyl alcohol, pexelizumab, pimecrolimus, pitavastatin calcium, porfiromycin, prasterone, prasugrel, pravastatin sodium, prednisone, pregabalin, prinomastat, PRO-2000, propofol, prostate cancer vaccine; Rasagiline mesilate, rhBMP-2/ACS, rhBMP-2/BCP, rhC1, ribavirin, rilpivirine, ritonavir, rituximab, Ro-26-9228, rosuvastatin calcium, rosuvastatin sodium, rubitecan; Selodenoson, simvastatin, sirolimus, sitaxsentan sodium, sorafenib, SS(dsFv)-PE38, St. John's Wort extract, stavudine; Tacrolimus, tadalafil, tafenoquine succinate, talaglumetad, tanomastat, taxus, tegaserod maleate, telithromycin, tempol, tenofovir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, testosterone enanthate, TH-9507, thalidomide, tigecycline, timolol maleate, tiotropium bromide, tipifarnib, torcetrapib, trabectedin, travoprost, travoprost/timolol, treprostinil sodium; Valdecoxib, vardenafil hydrochloride hydrate, varenicline, VEGF-2 gene therapy, venlafaxine hydrochloride, vildagliptin, vincristine sulfate, voriconazole, VRX-496, VX-385; Warfarin sodium; Ximelagatran; Yttrium 90 (90Y) ibritumomab tiuxetan; Zanolimumab, zidovudine.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in second remission or relapse.

Most children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are successfully treated by chemotherapy. For those patients, who relapse on therapy, bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is considered most appropriate after a subsequent remission is achieved. Three boys with ALL aged from 9 to 13 years met these criteria and received BMT from their HLA-compatible sisters after marrow ablation with total body irradiation 12 Gy plus high dose cytosine arabinoside 3 gm/m2/12h x 12 doses and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with cyclosporine plus short course methotrexate from March 10, 1989 to May 23, 1992. Filgrastim (rhG-CSF) was used to hasten the recovery of granulocyte in one patient. All three patients got full engraftment and two had grade 1 acute GVHD. None of them developed chronic GVHD. Two patients have disease-free survival over 51 and 12 months respectively post BMT without further chemotherapy. One patient died of recurrent refractory leukemia 5 months after BMT. The toxicity of this conditioning regimen included photophobia, conjunctivitis and erythematous skin rashes. One patient who received filgrastim from day 1 to 21 developed severe bone pain. However, this patient had faster recovery of granulocyte count than the other two patients. The preliminary results of this work favors BMT for children with recurrent ALL whose ultimate survival is usually poor when treated with chemotherapy. Further efforts are necessary to investigate new methods for reducing leukemic relapse in ALL patients undergoing BMT.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

[High-dose chemotherapy with four drugs and peripheral blood progenitor cell autologous transplantation in disseminated breast cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy (in terms of overall survival [OS] and progression-free survival [PFS]) of a high-dose chemotherapy protocol including four drugs and peripheral stem cell rescue (PSCR) plus posttransplant G-CSF (filgrastim) in disseminated breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-three metastatic breast cancer patients were treated with a four-drug program of high-dose chemotherapy including cyclophosphamide (6 g/m2), thiotepa (500 mg/m2), carboplatin (800-1,600 mg/m2) and mitoxantrone (20-60 mg/m2) with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell support followed by filgrastim. Most cases (92%) had previously received conventional induction chemotherapy with anthracycline-containing combinations. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 27 months (range 12-43 months) from transplant, the median survival of the overall group was 25 months, with an OS projected at 43 months of 31%. Patients in complete remission after induction chemotherapy or status NED (no evidence of disease: surgical resection of metastases) presented the best outcome, with a projected PFS of 50% at 43 months. Patients intensified without complete response had a poor outcome. The most important extramedullary toxicity was mucositis. Four patients (7.5%) died as a consequence of treatment (2 with sepsis-associated ARDS, one with venooclussive disease of the liver, one with congestive cardiac failure). CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of metastatic breast cancer patients in complete remission after induction chemotherapy or NED status seems to be good with our high-dose chemotherapy including four drug and PSCR. On the other hand, patients intensified without complete response presented a bad outcome and do not seem candidates for future trials with this therapeutic approach.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

HLA-identical sibling peripheral blood cell transplants. The Australian experience and preliminary results of a randomised study.

Twenty-seven patients undergoing matched sibling BMT were randomly assigned to be infused with bone marrow alone or bone marrow supplemented with allogeneic peripheral blood cells collected by apheresis after stimulation with filgrastim. Other transplant conditions were standard and identical for the two groups. There was no difference between the groups in survival or acute or chronic GVHD, however, the patients receiving blood cells had significantly more rapid neutrophil engraftment by a median of 2 days. We conclude that filgrastim-mobilised HLA-identical sibling allogeneic blood cells are biologically active and safe.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Isolated pleural effusion with hematopoietic cells of mixed lineage in a patient receiving granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor after high-dose chemotherapy.

A 43-yr-old woman with recently diagnosed breast carcinoma presented with a right pleural effusion after a cycle of adjuvant, high-dose chemotherapy supported by peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, Filgrastim). Cytologic examination of the pleural aspirate yielded highly cellular material composed predominantly of cells of myeloid and macrophage/monocytic lineages. Despite clinical concern of a malignant effusion, the combination of cytologic and immunophenotypic examination yielded the correct diagnosis of a nonneoplastic effusion related to underlying pleural inflammation and possibly the administration of G-CSF.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results of an open study to assess feasibility, safety, and efficacy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with severe, refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Fourteen patients (3 male, 11 female, mean age 43 years, mean disease duration 10 years) with active, destructive, refractory RA entered the study. Autologous hematopoietic stem cells were collected by leukapheresis after mobilization with a single infusion of cyclophosphamide (CYC; 4 gm/m2) and subcutaneous injections of filgrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor). Immunomagnetic selection of CD34+ cells from the leukapheresis products was performed to deplete potentially autoreactive lymphocytes. The conditioning regimen consisted of intravenous administration of high doses of CYC (cumulative dose 200 mg/kg), with subsequent reinfusion of the graft. Patients were monitored for disease activity, disability, adverse effects, and hematopoietic and immunologic reconstitution. RESULTS: All 14 patients completed the mobilization and leukapheresis procedures successfully, and 12 proceeded to receive conditioning and transplantation. Engraftment occurred in all of these patients, with rapid hematologic recovery. No major unexpected toxicity was observed. Marked improvement of disease activity was recorded in 8 of 12 patients at >50% of the visits, with a followup ranging from 7 months to 21 months. The clinical responders included 2 patients who had previously failed treatment with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocking agents. CONCLUSION: High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous HSCT is feasible and safe, and can result in long-term improvement of disease activity in patients whose condition previously did not respond to conventional antirheumatic drugs or TNF blocking agents. The persistence of active disease in some patients may reflect the heterogeneity of the underlying disease process.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Donor lymphocyte apheresis for adoptive immunotherapy compared with blood stem cell apheresis.

Donor lymphocyte transfusion has gained considerable interest as adoptive cellular immunotherapy for prevention or treatment of relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. This study was designed to compare the yield of CD3(+), CD3(+)4(+), CD3(+)8(+), CD19(+), CD3(-)56(+)16(+), and CD34(+) cells contained in apheresis products from 61 consecutive non-cytokine treated, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched donors for lymphocyte collection with the corresponding apheresis-derived cell yield from 112 consecutive, HLA-matched donors for blood stem cell collection who received recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (rhG-CSF, filgrastim) 6 microg/kg every 12 hours until cell collection was completed. Apheresis was started on day 4 or 5 of rhG-CSF treatment. The yield of lymphoid subsets was significantly different in the two sample groups, rhG-CSF treated product yields exceeding untreated product yields by a median of 2.1-fold (range: 1.3-2.6). However, the CD34(+) cell yield in rhG-CSF-treated apheresis products exceeded untreated products by 26-fold. A single untreated apheresis procedure was usually sufficient to collect a target dose of 1 x 10(8)/kg CD3(+) cells. Untreated apheresis products contained a median of 0.2 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells. A potential engraftment dose of > or =0.5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells per kg of recipient body weight was contained in 16% of 57 untreated apheresis products. One single apheresis performed in a normal, untreated donor provides a sufficient amount of CD3(+) cells for adoptive immunotherapy. Compared with that of an rhG-CSF stimulated apheresis product, the CD34(+) cell count is usually, but not always, below the engraftment dose range. RhG-CSF treatment has little effect on the yield of lymphoid subsets collected by apheresis but is highly selective of the release of CD34(+) cells. This report provides baseline data for studies that will show whether other cytokines such as granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and/or Flt-3 Ligand can immunomodulate allotransfusates in vivo to improve the graft-vs.-leukemia (GVL) effect after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, while lowering the incidence and severity of graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD).

Adult↗
PubMed2008

Mobilization of Ph chromosome-negative peripheral blood stem cells in a child with chronic myeloid leukemia after imatinib-induced complete molecular remission.

Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is rare in the pediatric population. Allogeneic stem cell transplant remains the only curative therapy; however, identifying a fully matched donor is not always possible. Imatinib mesylate has been shown to induce hematologic and cytogenetic response in adults and children with CML. We describe a child who achieved molecular remission with imatinib mesylate. BCR-ABL negative peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were successfully collected after mobilization with filgrastim.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1998

Repeated cycles of G-CSF-combined postremission chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia in a first complete remission: a pilot study.

The cure rate of acute myeloid leukemia might increase if G-CSF were given concurrently with repeated postremission chemotherapy. However, this therapy might cause severe complications, including depletion of normal hematopoietic progenitors as a long-term toxicity. Thus, we conducted a pilot study of this strategy. Twenty-six acute myeloid leukemia patients in a first complete remission (CR) were treated with two courses of consolidation chemotherapy (10-day BHAC-DMP, consisting of behenoyl cytosine arabinoside, daunorubicin, 6-mercaptopurine and prednisolone) and repeated maintenance-intensification therapy including eight cycles of six-day BHAC-DMP. G-CSF (filgrastim) was administered concurrently with these BHAC-DMP therapies. Toxicity during the therapeutic period was not significant in the study group compared with the historical control, treated with the same regimen without G-CSF. Neutrophil recovery after the consolidation therapy was more rapid in the study group than in the historical control (p = 0.066 and 0.024 for the first and second consolidation courses, respectively). Long-term toxicity, such as cytopenia, has not been seen in eight patients who have remained in CR for a long period (range: 39-58 months). At a median follow-up of 39 months, the predicted rate of 42-month CR duration for these 26 patients was 50% (95% confidence limits: 30% to 71%). We conclude that G-CSF-combined repeated BHAC-DMP postremission therapy is feasible. Full elucidation of the clinical benefit of this strategy will require further study.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1994

The clinical utility of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: early achievements and future promise.

Recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rHuG-CSF) is a hematopoietic growth factor that acts selectively on the neutrophil lineage, and has had a major impact on clinical practice. Two forms are in clinical use: filgrastim has been approved for use in more than 45 countries for the amelioration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and restoration of granulopoiesis following bone-marrow transplantation and lenograstim has been approved in Europe and Japan. In some countries, rHuG-CSF is also approved for various other indications, such as severe chronic neutropenia. Infection and neutropenia are a major cause of morbidity and mortality following cytotoxic chemotherapy, and there is a known correlation between neutropenia and the risk of infection. Hematopoietic growth factors have been used successfully in the prevention and treatment of neutropenia. There is evidence to suggest that use of rHuG-CSF before the onset of neutropenia allows patients to receive the maximum benefit; however, patients who do not receive rHuG-CSF prophylactically still benefit from the use of rHuG-CSF for the treatment of febrile neutropenia. These patients have an accelerated neutrophil recovery and a shorter duration of febrile neutropenia. These effects seem to translate into a significant reduction in the number of patients requiring prolonged hospitalization. This paper reviews the use of rHuG-CSF in the treatment of febrile neutropenia and describes how it is routinely used by hematologists and oncologists in non-clinical trial settings.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1997

Frequency of point mutations in the gene for the G-CSF receptor in patients with chronic neutropenia undergoing G-CSF therapy.

Point mutations in the gene for the G-CSF receptor have been reported previously in a subgroup of patients with severe congenital neutropenia. Here, we investigated the frequency of these specific G-CSF receptor mutations in patients with neutropenic disorders undergoing treatment with recombinant human (r-metHu)G-CSF (Filgrastim). Nucleotides 2306 to 2561, including the critical region (nucleotides 2384-2429) from the intracellular domain of the G-CSF receptor gene, were amplified by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, and DNA was sequenced directly and after transformation in E. coli. Four of 30 patients with severe congenital neutropenia displayed a point mutation in the tested cytoplasmic region of the G-CSF receptor gene. Two of the four patients with a mutated G-CSF receptor developed acute myeloid leukemia secondary to congenital neutropenia. G-CSF receptor analyses were performed in myeloid cells taken at different time points in the four patients with the mutated receptor, and no correlation between occurrence of the mutation and time or dose of r-metHuG-CSF treatment was found. No point mutations in the G-CSF receptor critical domain could be detected in cells from the other 26 congenital neutropenia patients. Additionally, no G-CSF receptor point mutations could be seen in neutrophils, blood and bone marrow mononuclear cells from patients with cyclic or idiopathic neutropenia, and bone marrow mononuclear cells from patients suffering from severe aplastic anemia. Similar results were obtained by Touw et al., demonstrating that five out of 25 patients with congenital neutropenia reveal G-CSF receptor mutations. These data show that the point mutations in the critical region of the intracellular part of the G-CSF receptor occur only in a subgroup of severe congenital neutropenia patients. Furthermore, our data suggest that the described G-CSF receptor point mutations are not correlated with the start, duration or doses of r-metHuG-CSF treatment, but might result from genetic instability in the G-CSF receptor gene in severe congenital neutropenia.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

The effect of recombinant human granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (rHu GM-CSF) and rHu G-CSF administration on neutrophil chemiluminescence assay in patients following cyclic chemotherapy.

Secondary infections related to neutropenia and functional defects of phagocytes are common consequences in patients treated for cancer. The hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors (CSF) have been introduced into clinical practice as additional supportive measures that can reduce the incidence of infectious complications in patients with cancer and neutropenia. The aim of this study was to determine the role of granuolcyte/macrophage(GM)-CSF and granulocyte(G)-CSF in enhancing in vivo human neutrophil function. A luminol-dependent chemiluminescence assay was developed to evaluate whether the repair in neutropenia accompanies the ability of neutrophils to function. A dose of 5 microg G-CSF kg(-1) day(-1) [recombinant human (rHu) G-CSF; filgrastim] or 250 microg GM-CSF m(-2) day(-1) (rHu GM-CSF; molgramostim) was administered subcutaneously once daily to 12 metastatic cancer patients being treated with different cytotoxic regimens. All injections of CSF were given after the initiation of neutropenia and continued until the occurrence of an absolute neutrophil recovery. rHu GM-CSF and rHu G-CSF, administered once daily at the 250 microg m(-2) day(-1) and 5 microg kg(-1) day(-1) level, were effective in increasing the absolute neutrophil count and neutrophil function, as measured by an automated chemiluminescence system.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

High-dose-intensity combination chemotherapy for advanced sarcomas: a pilot study.

A new polychemotherapy schedule involving high dose intensity and shortened intervals has been developed for patients with advanced sarcomas. Mesna at 2500 mg/m2 for 3 days, epidoxorubicin at 60 mg/m2 on day 1, ifosfamide at 2500 mg/m2 for 3 days, and dacarbazine at 450 mg/m2 for 2 days were given every 2 weeks to a consecutive series of 20 patients. All patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; Filgrastim) subcutaneously at 300 microg from day 5 to day 12 of each cycle. The treatment was feasible and toxicity was acceptable, with grade IV myelotoxicity being observed only in one case. In all, 6 of 14 evaluable patients had an objective response; the median survival was 12 months. Toxicity was milder than that observed for the classic combination MAID, and the planned dose intensity was maintained in the majority of cases.

Adult↗