Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Embryos”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 613 records · Page 34Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Cannulation of a resistant internal os with the malleable outer sheath of a coaxial soft embryo transfer catheter does not affect in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of cannulation of a resistant cervical os with the outer malleable sheath of a double-lumen, soft ET catheter on IVF-ET outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University-based IVF center. PATIENT(S): One hundred forty-two patients undergoing 142 ETs. INTERVENTION(S): Trial ultrasound-guided ET at all transfers, leaving the malleable outer sheath in situ when the soft inner catheter could not negotiate the internal os. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate. RESULT(S): In 102 ETs (71.8%), the soft inner sheath easily negotiated the internal os (group 1). Forty ETs (28.2%) required cannulation of resistant internal ora with the outer sheath of the trial catheter (group 2). Implantation rates (35% vs. 32% in groups 1 and 2, respectively) and clinical pregnancy rates (50% vs. 45%) were not significantly different between groups. Blood was present on the transfer catheter after ET more frequently in group 2 than in group 1 (55% vs. 15%); however, neither the implantation rate nor the clinical pregnancy rate were affected by the presence of blood. CONCLUSION(S): Cannulation of a resistant internal os by the malleable outer sheath and blood on the transfer catheter after ET do not have an adverse effect on implantation rate or clinical pregnancy rate.

Blood↗
PubMed2000

The choice of embryo transfer catheter affects embryo implantation after IVF.

OBJECTIVE: Comparison of two transfer catheters in an IVF program. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical study. SETTING: A private tertiary care center for ART. PATIENT(S): 66 patients < 38 years of age undergoing IVF and/or ICSI. INTERVENTION(S): Patients were randomly assigned to undergo ET using the Tomcat catheter (n = 32) or the TDT catheter (n = 34). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcome measures were implantation and pregnancy rates. Secondary outcome measures were contamination with blood and/or mucus on the tip of the catheter, cramping or patient discomfort, and time required to complete ET. RESULT(S): Use of the Tomcat catheter resulted in significantly higher implantation (25.2% vs. 8.4%) and clinical pregnancy rates (47% vs. 14.7%) compared with the TDT catheter. All secondary outcome measures were similar for both catheters. CONCLUSION(S): The choice of ET catheter may affect the success of IVF-ET cycles. Use of the Tomcat catheter compared with the TDT catheter seems to result in significantly better efficiency of the ET procedure and is more cost effective.

Adult↗